User Reviews (16)

Add a Review

  • bkoganbing6 January 2011
    Warning: Spoilers
    In their only joint project Susan Hayward and Kirk Douglas do yeoman service in Top Secret Affair which was a project originally intended to reunite Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall as a screen team. It's interesting to view it and imagine Bogey and Bacall as the general and the publishing tycoon.

    The only other female publishing tycoon that comes to mind on the big screen is Angela Lansbury in State Of The Union. Later on the small screen we saw the patrician Nancy Marchand in Lou Grant. Hayward tends more to the Lansbury model.

    She's got a project in which the current administration which was headed in real life by a five star general named Eisenhower has messed up in her view. She wanted an industrialist friend of her late father appointed to the International Atomic Energy Agency and instead the administration appointed a two star general war hero in the person of Kirk Douglas. Hayward's not taking this lying down, she and her news magazine are going to do a number on Douglas if they can dig up the dirt or create some.

    Ironically enough Eisenhower never met a businessman he didn't like and he would just as soon have appointed an industrial tycoon instead of one of his military comrades in real life.

    But Kirk is one two star hunk of man and Hayward first relents. But when he turns her advances down she's on the warpath with more of a vengeance than ever. In a moment of indiscretion he had confessed a wartime affair with a spy and she spills the beans. It's the man in the White House himself who bails him out in the end.

    This was Kirk Douglas's second venture at comedy and his first since My Dear Secretary nine years earlier. As he was playing against his dynamic self, it worked to a large degree. Susan got to play a drunk scene in her second film in a row, having gotten an Oscar nomination for the far more serious I'll Cry Tomorrow. It's pretty funny when she tries to drink Douglas under the table at a nightclub which she considers her theater of war.

    Three supporting performances are worth noting. Roland Winters is great as a bottom feeding Senatorial inquisitor in the manner of Joe McCarthy. Paul Stewart has some of the best lines in the film as Hayward's managing editor and that woman did need some managing. But best of all is Jim Backus as the army publicity man straight from Madison Avenue with a bird Colonel's eagles on his shoulder. Not a combat veteran in the classic sense by any means.

    Top Secret Affair is not the best work that either of the stars did, but it should definitely satisfy their fans.
  • This movie starts out like the kind of romantic comedy that Hollywood often does well. Susan Hayward is a powerful publisher who wants to discredit an army general (Kirk Douglas) in her magazine. For the first part of the movie, while their relationship is more adversarial, the film moves along fine and is both amusing and enjoyable. However, as the relationship changes and the story gets more complicated, the movie starts to run out of steam. This is a strange phenomenon, as one can almost pinpoint the exact moment when the air starts to go out of the balloon.

    On the plus side, the film has two top-notch stars and a fine supporting cast including Paul Stewart and Jim Backus. But since, in my opinion, the film gets weaker instead of stronger as it goes along I can only give it a marginal recommendation.
  • With the powerful energy and sex appeal present in both Kirk Douglas and Susan Hayward, isn't it strange that when they finally made a movie together, it was a comedy? It's an oddball comedy, a supposed battle of the sexes that doesn't really hit the mark of any target, but if you want to see both their energies up on the silver screen together, you've got to rent it.

    Kirk is a war hero, a general up for a big promotion. Suzy is a journalist, in charge of a great deal of publicity (good or bad) in the country. She doesn't know him and doesn't like him, and she plans to turn a seemingly harmless interview into a damning reputation crusher. Kirk arrives at her house with his faithful sidekicks, Paul Stewart and Jim Backus, and his precise regime of eating, exercise, bedtime, and moral etiquette immediately irritate Suzy. What does she do when she realizes there's no legitimate dirt to find? She forgets she's a journalist and remembers she's a woman; in other words, she fights dirty.

    Even though this is far from a romantic comedy, some naughty bits made it through the censors and amused audiences. In order to be alone with him, Suzy says she gets "inhibited with more than one man in the bedroom," effectively sending Jim and Paul away. When she's particularly mad, Kirk reminds her she can't yet make good on her threat to kill him, because "generals die in bed," and in that scene they're nowhere near a bedroom. There were some funny moments, and some more dramatic moments, but all in all it felt like a waste of their talents. Since we all know they're capable of making better movies, have one of your favorites on hand for next weekend.
  • Solid performances by both Hayward and Douglas and a nice turn by Jim Backus in this battle-of-the-wills comedy. Hayward is head of a Time/Life-style empire that attempts to smear the record of war hero general Douglas. As worthy opponents the sparks are subtle and adult, especially for the time. It avoids politics in an obvious way while showcasing why Kirk Douglas had legions of female fans, and why Susan Hayward was the thinking man's movie fave. Not a knee-slapper, but fairly realistic as a smart comedy. Worth a watch and better than Leonard Maltin thinks it is.
  • Susan hayward is Dot Peale, publisher. Lady of means and power. when her own candidate doesn't make the grade for a certain job, Dot brings General Goodwin (Kirk Douglas) to her home to try to get the goods on him, catch him being "too military". You'll recognize advance man Colonel Gooch... Jim Backus (Mr. Howell!) keep an eye out for Charles Lane, right at the start; he held the record for the most roles under his belt for the longest time; maybe he still does. and of course, Dot and the General have both under-estimated each other. lots of talking. they both think they have the upper hand, but do they? what have they won? can they come to an understanding? it's good. pretty low key. lots of talking and arguing. directed by Hank Potter. no oscars, but directed some biggies, like Mr. Blandings. Novel by John Marquand.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Yes, I really found the plot to this film to be just plain dumb. It is contrived that the producers and writers should have sentenced to a firing squad. Powerful magazine owner (Susan Hayward) decides to fry a general Kirk Douglas) who is up for an influential position; he seems to be the perfect officer; they fall in love; they fall out of love (actually, more than once); will they end up together? I won't go into the details...too preposterous. It's a romantic comedy that makes you roll your eyes.

    But...it was still interest to watch the film...not for the plot...but to see Hayward and Douglas throwing everything into their acting. They were both always "strong" actors, and they demonstrate that here, and that's why I sat through 100 minutes of this. Douglas has never been a favorite actor of mine, but I like him. But I almost always loved films with Susan Hayward. I give them credit of not sinking in a froth of absurdity.

    Not recommended unless you are a big fan of one of them.
  • This project was previously designed for Bogie and Bacall, nevertheless the malignat disease is about to win the battle against a hard smoking Bogie, thus the couple decided quit, they were replaced by Susan Hayward & Kirk Douglas, intriguing that Kirk already paved a solid career, but somehow he was casting as second billed, should be Susan enough great than Kirk Douglas??

    The plot is engaging and pleasant to watch, with humor oriented through the funny character of the clumsy Col. Gouch (Jim Backus), a tycoon of high profile magazine Dorothy Peale (Susan Hayward) lobbied on backstage to nominee a civil person to Atomic Energy Committee, to her dismay the office went to war hero Major General Melville A. Goodwin (Kirk Douglas) a hard line soldier, over such defeat Dorothy has an insight, inviting Melville for an interview at her house in order to besmirch his reputation vis-à-vis to the public, the outcome is whatsoever foreseeable as Hollywood always did.

    Due the poorest votes and reviews this picture seemigly didn't had any impact at its release time, that I recollect never hear a thing over this picture, maybe for a lack of chemistry between them, Hayward seems so prudish, well dressed and behaved, it ain't Kirk's kind of woman, I expected something hot, peppery, sounds a family movie,more suitable to Rock Hudson & Cary Grant (those guys that used to kiss the chins of the actress, sorry sounds a bit offensive) also the storyline is far-fetched, whoever heard an interview which takes ten days to be done, apart these minors flaws it won't bother anyone!!

    Thanks for reading.

    Resume:

    First watch: 2021 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 7
  • For movie goers of the 1950s, "Top Secret Affair" was an entertaining film starring Kirk Douglas and Susan Hayward. As a comedy romance, it's about as far-fetched a plot as many such films are. And, that's where some of the enjoyment comes from. The comedy is fair with a screenplay that has a tough time swinging the leading lady back and forth as a villain, then lover, then villain, then lover.

    Susan Hayward's Dottie Peale is a publishing tycoon who first wants to torpedo Maj. Gen. Melville Goodwin (Kirk Douglas) as new head of the Joint Atomic International Commission. The best of the comedy comes in her various failed attempts to get him on tape and film in bad positions. After they have a night's romance, that doesn't last, to her dismay, she goes back to plan one. This happens a couple times

    The movie borrowed some from a 1951 novel, "Melville Goodwin," by John Marquand. But that was mostly the names with major revisions in the characters and story. It's mostly fluff, but enjoyable stuff for the stars and their supporting cast.
  • Hayward is a clichéd stereotype--the tough as nails lady who really just needs a man! Because of this, you KNOW where the film will eventually go. If you think about it, this is the sort of woman she ALSO played in "The Conquerer", "Where Love Has Gone", "David and Bathsheba" and countless other films.

    The movie begins with a VERY one-dimensional lady publisher (Hayward) deciding to do a hatchet piece on a famous general. In other words, while she would pretend to be fair, she already decided to make the article very negative regardless of how their interviews go. So, she invites him over to her house to stay for a few days--and again and again, she tries to trip him up and get him to say something she could twist and take out of context. As for the General (Kirk Douglas), he's almost as one-dimensional--way too perfect, sexist and in control to be real. I am surprised after this inauspicious beginning that I actually continued watching the film--especially since I knew what would happen next. After all, the fact that the movie is called "Top Secret Affair" made this deduction pretty easy! Basically, she tries again and again and again (without luck) and in the process falls in love with the guy. Is there more to the film than this? Not really.

    Considering that at the time, Douglas and Hayward were top stars, it is surprising they'd be put into such a mediocre B-movie plot. Despite the budget, it's not a particularly good film and it's not surprising that the film isn't particularly famous. A must-see for die-hard fans of Douglas or Hayward but no one else.

    By the way, I read one time that Kirk Douglas didn't like folks knowing he was 5'9" (which, by the way, is a perfectly fine height). In many films, they either hired very short actors or put them in trenches to make him appear taller. In the film, he even says he's 6' tall!
  • In "Top Secret Affair" both Kirk Douglas and Susan Hayward were allowed to do the things that they did best. They were respectively cast as intense, inner directed, talented people in search of soul mates. their initial antagonism (primarily on Hayward's part with Douglas oblivious to it) is based on her misunderstanding of Douglas' true character and personal qualities. In reality both are highly patriotic , driven individuals with only the good of their country at heart. They are perfect partners with matching vitality and values. This is one instance where Hollywood started over from scratch, ignoring the contents of a good book but creating an original piece of light entertainment in the process.
  • rupie18 October 2017
    Imagine if an undertaker, or a Methodist parson, or the head of the local chapter of the DAR decided, on a whim, to sit down and write a comedy script. This movie would be something like what they would come up with. I cannot understand a 6.3 rating for a movie whose supposed humor is so forced, so wooden, so brittle. Comedies must have some credibility in their comic premises but everything here is so preposterous that one simply can't buy it. The head-spinning gyrations in the relationship between Douglas and Haywood's characters simply destroys the movie's comic premises. And since neither Douglas nor Haywood excelled at comedy, one wonders just who decided to cast them here. Both actors were sufficiently in demand that they could be choosy with their material, so one wonders what prompted to sign on to this dreck. Jim Backus excelled at comedy but even he can't do anything with what he is given here. I suffered through to the end just to see how it would turn out; because I suffered, you don't have to.
  • This was inspired by John P. Marquand's 1951 novel "Melville Goodwin: USA." The book was about an Army general's affair with a prominent woman, and it was one of Marquand's most entertaining. Unfortunately, the movie retains almost nothing of the original story except for the names of the two romantic leads. In the book, the general is already married, and making him a bachelor in the movie simply changes everything. The movie even eliminates the narrator of the book, who supplied much of its humor. Readers of the book can watch the movie with no sense of what will happen next. The two are that different, and the movie is undeniably inferior.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Susan Hayward has had a large following among a select audience, and while she has an Oscar, some definite classics and a cult following, for some reason, she is often forgotten when cinema historians talk about the best. She was definitely one of a kind with her bright red hair, Brooklyn accent and independent manner, and with a three film marathon of watching her do her thing, realized that she was a woman who might have loved men, but only those who allowed her to be true to herself and no man's hanger on. These three films all had those themes which allowed her to show her femininity but her assertiveness and the manner in which she deals with people who try to control her or put something over on her. In this film, she's quite a tough cookie, working as the head of a major magazine out to get a profile on tough Major Kirk Douglas. Here, the men work for her, and while she's tough, she's as commanding as Douglas is rather than demanding, and that makes her a very likable early female boss. Interviewing Douglas strikes up sparks between the two, and spending time interviewing him makes her feel somewhat guilty over the hidden photographer she has following her around on their dates in order to help her get more of "the scoop".

    It is interesting here to note that these two powerful people both have dedicated workers, but only Douglas has what would be referred to as a "yes man" working under him, in this case, the very animated Jim Backus who seems to really be emulating his Mr. Magoo character in his characterization here. At times, it gets to be too much, especially with him in a military uniform, and a colonel to boot! Paul Stewart plays Hayward's right hand man who tells her what's what and doesn't step in to protect her when her schemes catch up on her. The delightfully irascible Charles Lane is amusing as another assistant of hers. But the film definitely belongs to Douglas and Hayward who get into mischief in all sorts of ways. Susan has several amusing drunk sequences, in one stirring with squinty eyes a very large bourbon glass. Like Jean Arthur's character in "Mr. Deeds Goes to Town", she pushes Douglas into several odd situations, one which results him singing a military fight song. She is definitely the more comical of the two on the outside, while Douglas gets his laughs from being extremely serious throughout the entire film. Even his confessions about his past and his growing feelings for her are done in a very calculated manner which adds to the subtle comedy of his performance. Over all, however, the film is very calculated as well, where you can see the buttons being pushed and know in spite of how much you enjoy it that the premise is absurd and the situations not at all realistic.
  • Susan Hayward was a contract player at Warners and di a fww brief shots in WB films. Beautiful Susie left WB and went to Paramount where she got some plum roles such as Gary Cooper's Beau Geste, Frederic March I Married A Witch and Loretta Young in And Now Tomorrow

    This film was set to be aBogey-Bacall film but the great Bogie developed cancer and both Bogie and Mrs Bogart aka Lauren Bacall droped out and Jack Warner asked Susan Hayward to return to WB where Susie was given a star Bungalow on the WB lot and her fave cinematographer Stanley Cortez (Cortez did the great train shot with Jennifer Jones and Robert Walker in Since You went Away), and her fave costume exec Charles LaMaire. Susan looks beautiful in this Carrolton Production her own production company named after her adopted town in Georgia (Susan married Floyd Eaton Chalkley a former FBI agent who was a strong Catholic and Susan converted to Catholicism and both Chalkley and Susan are interred in the Church graveyard.

    Kirk Douglas replaced Bogart in this beautifully filmed movie.
  • I first saw this picture on television around 1970, in the middle of the Vietnam War, and found it confusing to my early teen sensibilities. Here were Kirk Douglas and Susan Hayward playing everything straight, yet it was supposed to be a "comedy," and a romantic comedy at that -- instead the plot lurched back and forth, mostly built around the Hayward character's alternating hate-love-hate-love feelings toward ramrod straight two-star general Kirk Douglas (who was specifically depicted as no desk-jockey, but a highly decorated combat officer, now moving on to a prominent administrative post). There are some strained attempts at humor involving the two leads, but what humor there is comes mostly courtesy of Jim Backus as a put-upon colonel in public relations and Paul Stewart as Hayward's one almost co-equal confidante. And if that were all there were to this movie (which started out as a vehicle for Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall), if would be a mildly amusing feature. But woven into the story is an absolutely savage look at the nature of the post-war press corps -- and publishers who think they can influence presidents and Congress -- and a tacit widespread suspicion of (if not outright hatred for) the military, doubly so from the members of the US Senate who are depicted (principally a fatuous, headline-hunting committee chairman played by Roland Winters). It was all difficult for me to understand in 1970, and having seen it again in 2018, I still can't figure out what the writers and producers had in mind for "entertainment," or if they were onto something about our society, or they were just telling a story with no relationship to reality. And if this is an accurate portrayal of where we were in this country in the second half of the 1950s, then perhaps we almost deserved the rot that would set in during the 1960s.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Overlooked little gem of a comedy that features Kirk Douglas as a no-nonsense Army major general, who models himself on no less than General George S. Patton, and Susan Hayward as an obnoxious female publisher who sets out to destroy his chances of getting an important appointment. Hayward tries repeatedly to set traps for Douglas to make him look like a buffoon in public, all of which backfire.

    The scheme culminates at a nightclub where Hayward fires up the rowdy, drunken audience into demanding that Douglas get up on stage and sing the U.S. Army's Caisson Song ("Over hill, over dale, we will hit the dusty trail, as those caissons go rolling along"), hoping he'll make a fool of himself. Douglas reluctantly agrees, and much to Hayward's surprise, ends up singing several verses -- standing at ramrod attention -- very proper and correct. The crowd loves it, but Hayward begins to regret her actions, and Douglas, having seen through her scheme, angrily stalks out of the nightclub. Definite high-point of the movie, and by the way, Kirk Douglas does a pretty creditable job belting out the tune! In typical Hollywood fashion, Douglas and Hayward end up falling in love while many complications and plot-twists ensue. I first saw this movie as a small kid, and always remembered the Caisson Song scene. Definitely worth a look!