Add a Review

  • jpdoherty16 August 2011
    Warning: Spoilers
    J. Arthur Rank's NORTH WEST FRONTIER is a classy British adventure yarn that can stand proudly beside the best efforts that Hollywood could offer. Also known as "Flame Over India" it was produced in 1959 by Marcel Heilman for the Rank organization and was directed with great gusto by the underrated J. Lee Thomson. No expense was spared on this colourful production. Filmed on actual Indian locations it was photographed in Cinemascope and glowing colour by the late great Geoffrey Unsworth and was adapted from a screenplay by Frank Nugent by Robin Estridge which derived from a story by Patrick Ford. Curiously there is a marked similarity with the narrative of NORTH WEST FRONTIER to that of John Ford's classic 1939 western "Stagecoach".Since Patrick Ford was the son of the great director that similarity is hardly surprising. Both stories concern an assorted group of travellers trying to safely reach their respective destinations and running the gauntlet of attacks by hordes of fierce horsemen intent on stopping them. With mostly British players the cast in NORTH WEST FRONTIER had an international mix led by Kenneth More. From Hollywood there's Lauren Bacall, from India I.S. Johar and the rest of the personnel was fleshed out with the cream of British character actors such as the brilliant Herbert Lom as a shady newspaperman, the delightfully fussy Wilfrid Hyde White as a diplomat, Ian Hunter as the British Governor, the lovely Ursula Jeans as the Governor's wife and Eugene Deckers as an arms dealer who detests firearms ("I've never had one of those things in my hands in my life").

    It is 1905 and the feud is raging in India's Northwest territories between Moslims and Hindus and their British masters. Six year old Hindu Prince Kishen's life is in grave danger. As heir to the Hindu throne the Moslims must annihilate him at all costs and it falls to the British to protect the little prince. After rescuing him from the palace British Captain Scott (Kenneth More) must now secretly sneak the boy, his governess (Lauren Bacall) plus a motley collection of escapees out of the British Embassy at Hasarbad and make a dash by train to Kolapur three hundred miles away in Delhi. Almost from the moment they begin their journey under the cover of darkness the action never lets up. From then on there are well executed action scenes throughout the picture particularly exciting is the siege of the British compound by Moslim forces with hundreds storming the ramparts. Such scenes are as good if not better than anything Hollywood could conjure up.

    Performances are excellent from all concerned. Kenneth More - always an appealing actor - gives another personable portrayal just like he did playing legless pilot Douglas Bader in "Reach Fot Sky" three years earlier. Lauren Bacall though seems a little out of place in a British movie but was obviously cast to give some appeal to the American market (She has top billing on the American prints and the publicity). But the standout performance comes from the great Herbert Lom whose real name - you wont believe - happens to be ......wait for it... Herbert Angelo Kuchacevich Ze Schluderpacherm. Ouch! How about that? Thankfully his name in the picture is simply Van Layden. Also of interest is the splendid music score by Russian composer Mischa Spoliansky which boasts some great action cues, a nice love theme for the pictures softer moments and to point up the British presence in India good use is made of the rousing "Eton Boating Song" which is interpolated into the score and in one scene is vocalized by Mr. More.

    NORTH WEST FRONTIER is the quintessential British adventure story. Its high production values puts it that bit above others of the genre. It's hard to go wrong when you have a well told story well directed beautifully photographed and well played out by a good cast.

    Yes indeed NORTH WEST FRONTIER is a jolly good show!
  • jagfx9 February 2000
    I taped this movie simply because it co-starred Lauren Bacall, and while I expected the movie to be good, it far exceeded my expectations. North West Frontier, is a terrifically paced, exciting adventure. Bacall co-stars as a governess who must escort a young heir to the Hindu throne through a cross country Indian battlefield. Helping her to do this is a British solider and a random assortment of civilians along for the ride. Herbert Lom is wonderfully creepy - but I won't say why. Definately a movie to check out.
  • I found it by accident on YouTube and what a pleasant surprise it turned out top be. An action film set in British India with a superb script. Lauren Bacall, Kenneth More and Herbert Lom lead the cast. A gripping train raid that never lets go. The director is J Lee Thompson and in my movie going life, J Lee Thompson is associated with many unexpected treats. "Tiger Bay" for instance, remember that one? With Hayley Mills and Horst Buchholz or the insane Shirley MacLaine comedy "What A Way To Go" Not to mention "The Guns Of Navarone" or the original "Cape Fear" . Here, Thompson excels. A suspenseful, thrilling tale told by a master. .
  • This film was screened last night on PBS. The title "Flame over India" caught my attention. Noting that the movie was made in 1959, I thought this would be one of the slow paced older movies. Surprise! The movie keeps you on the edge of your couch all the time. Some salient features:

    1) The hero is more credible like the heroes and leaders you see in real-life - not huge and invincible like Arnold. Puts his own life at risk to save a young Hindu prince's life from Muslim rebels all the while knowing that the kid will be coerced to fight against him should the British not cease the occupation of India. Nevertheless, his actions are based on his duty as a soldier and as a compassionate human being.

    2) Effective portrayal of opposing views - the gullible British lady, Mrs. Wyndham commenting that peoples not under the British Empire were uncivilized and the extremely polarized view of the cynical Indian journalist who opposes killing in theory. The movie brings out the sentiments from both sides. Also well done was the scene of a train massacre in showing the courage of Ms Wyatt to walk among the slain and save a young child that was still alive.

    3) Several thrilling moments and some moments of suspense. The ambushes feel very real.

    4) The movie was shot in India and it gives a very realistic look - especially the trains and the rural stations. Contrary to what many in the Western Hemisphere believe, the movie shows that not all Indians in that time were illiterate (Gupta speaks reasonably good English).

    All in all a great movie. I would love to watch it again.
  • 1905 India , riots try to overthrow the Maharaja from Norhwest frontier on a rebel-held county . The film portrays a British group on a stronghold being besieged by Indian rebel tribes, banded together against the Brits and they're led by Muslim leaders. The English people are surrounded by Moslems army which spent time in the siege . The governor( Ian Hunter) assigns captain Scott (one of Kenneth More's best) as responsible of protection the young prince , undertaking a dangerous escape . Scott has to save the Maharaja's son , attempting to get the heir to safety and getaway by commandeering a steam train . Along the way they encounter bandits , attackers , treason and sabotage . The Brits contra-attack displaying on the train a machine-gun , making a brutal slaughter . Scott takes the action by aiding the passengers (Lauren Bacall, Herbert Lom, Ursula Jeans ,Deckers, Wilfred Hyde White) throughout four hundred miles of risked travel .

    This is a British attempt to match the US adventure's spectacles of the mid-sixties, containing derring-do, romance , old-fashioned action set mostly aboard a train, spectacular battles, gorgeous outdoors and resulting to be quite entertaining . It's a fiery early 20th-century adventure yarn with political connotations that some moments makes little sense but bulges with emotion that keeps coming at you, as action and adventures is maintained throughout . It's one of several adventures-action pictures made in Britain in the sixties that starred such Hollywood stars as Lauren Bacall and previously in the fifties as Victor Mature and Robert Taylor. There are strong performances from Herbert Lom as suspicious journalist and Wilfred Hyde White as feisty old man , who have made few bad films . Lauren Bacall as understanding governess, plays with some of sensitivity , and still successfully acting . Personable interpretation by I.S. Johar who steals the show as likable driver. Latterly, as very secondaries appear Ian Hunter , Alan Cuthbertson and Jack Gwillin, among others . But the main protagonist is the old machine called Empress of India Victoria . Luminous cinematography in rich Eastmancolor by Oscar-winning Geoffrey Unsworth, though with abuse of transparency . The movie was glamorously shot in Guadix , Granada , Andalucia , Spain and interior filmed in Pinewood studios. Emotive and atmospheric musical score by Spoliansky and conducted by the habitual Muir Matheson.

    The motion picture is well and blazingly directed by J. Lee Thompson, he's a skill and successfully craftsman . He has directed numerous films ,British comedies, drama , suspense but his most successful films are the fresh and diverting adventures . Lee Thompson directed good Western ( McKenna gold , White Buffalo) and all king of genres as Sci-Fi (Conquest and Battle of planet of apes), terror (reincarnation of Peter Proud, Eye of the devil), adventures (King of the sun, Taras Bulba, and Northwest frontier also titled Fire over India) and Warlike ( Guns of Navarone, Von Braun). J. Lee Thomson working from the 50s in England, finished his career making Chuck Norris (Firewalker) and Charles Bronson vehicles (Evil that men do, Messenger of death, Death Wish 4 : Crackdown, Caboblanco, St Ives) and a string of TV movies until his demise at 2002 . Watchable results for this good adventure movie .
  • Crimpo212 November 2005
    Warning: Spoilers
    As someone else said - they certainly don't make them like this any more! A strong script brought to life by some of the best character actors of the period. Full of excitement with strong moments of pathos and uncringeworthy moments of sentiment.

    I have to comment on those who feel this is an imperialist romp. It is far more intelligent than that. The British characters may express imperialist sentiments but Van Leyden is allowed to refute them. That Van Leyden is revealed as the villain does not negate his arguments - he is not presented as a fanatic, just as a man on the other side for every bit as good reasons as the British are on theirs. Remember that whatever its setting this film is very much POST-Raj. Scott is also made hopelessly sexist (as his character would be) while Bacall's character is allowed to refute him. Its a subtle script - and shouldn't be under-estimated! Several reviews have referred to I.S.Johar as Gupta. It is a very fine performance. His character may be 'cringing' but forelock-tugging hadn't got a colour bar at the time when this movie is set. When roused Gupta is quite ready to stand up to Scott or most anyone else! It is also perfectly apparent that without his skills all on the train are doomed - his comments on the massacre are poignant especially when one recalls that the actor was born in what is now Pakistan. Train massacres were a terrible feature of the partition period with all religious groups suffering terribly.

    Oh and what a cast. One expects top notch performances from the likes of More, Bacall, Lom and Hyde-White and we aren't let down. Eugene Deckers is very fine as the cynical arms merchant and Ursula Jeans (a child of the Raj herself) is a second strong female character to complement Bacall.

    Oh and it has a happy ending too...
  • Except for some unusually exciting moments, "Northwest Frontier" is a standard British Western (in this case Northwestern). This is a truly exciting tale of Nineteenth Century India with Kenneth More playing a British captain delivering a young Hindu prince to safety. Lauren Bacall co-stars as the young prince's English governess.

    This film is paced like a Saturday Matinee serial. More and his cohorts go from one hair-raising experience to another. They must dodge broken rails, an almost missing bridge over a yawning chasm, a spy and the usual hostile tribesman. The movie is worth watching for the scene in which the little party crosses an almost destroyed bridge. I knew how it would turn out and I still couldn't help cringing.

    More brings his usual British humor to his role as the captain charged with an impossible mission. The script is sparing on the dialogue, which contributes to the serial-like character of the film. Who needs dialogue when the characters are dodging one death-defying situation after another. Bacall plays a somewhat Anglophobic American woman who finds More interesting anyway. She and More make an excellent team, but their relationship would have been worth developing further. Veteran character Herbert Lom is on board for more than the train ride.

    Watch this one either under this title or "Flame Over India", which is the name under which it usually appears on the Late Show. You'll be glad you did.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I first saw North West Frontier when I was rather young and is one of those movies which you tend to never forget.

    Captain Scott is assigned to take a young Indian prince to safety across India to Kolapor. Having just missed the last refugee train, he manages to secure an ageing steam loco, Empress of India plus a coach and wagon for the coal. He was lucky there. Scott and the prince are joined by a motley collection of people for the dangerous journey including an American woman who would become Scott's lover, a reporter who wants the prince dead and a pair of upper class Britains and two soldiers. Plenty of dangers along the way: attacking tribes, blown up railway tracks, a blown up bridge and more attacking tribes. At the first station, we learn the refugee train was ambushed and everyone on board killed, apart from a baby which is rescued by the American woman, Catherine Wyatt. After crossing the bombed bridge and the reporter's attempts to kill the prince, they reach Kolapor safely, without the reporter, who was pushed off the train roof.

    North West Frontier has to be one of my favourite adventure movies and contains some good scenery. It also has some excellent background music, especially the Henley Regatta song, Swing, Swing Together.

    Now to the excellent cast: Kenneth More as Scott, Lauren Bacall as Catherine Wyatt, Herbert Lom as the reporter, Wilfred Hyde-White, I S Johar as the train driver Gupta and Ursula Jeans. Also, Eugene Deckers and Ian Hunter.

    North West Frontier is a must for all fans of this type of movie and will also appeal to railway enthusiasts too (like myself). Fantastic.

    Rating: 5 stars out of 5.
  • This must be one of the greatest underrated films in cinematic history. Most films of this type are overrated, but not this one. Aside from the obvious comparisons to Stagecoach, there are elements in the film that remind one of Wages of Fear, Lawrence of Arabia, and even Wait Until Dark. Herbert Lom plays a great heavy/hero (this depends on your political views). Lom played a Muslim nationalist who wanted to rid himself and future Pakistan (40 years later) of British colonial rule. This is quite a bit like rooting for the American Indians to be beaten by the European colonists of America. So who has the moral high ground? I really didn't care; I just cared about the film, which was beautifully photographed, wonderfully directed and the Rank Organization is to be commended for the the job they did. There was one suspenseful scene after another and full of action. You could not ask for more from a feature film. Highly Recommended.
  • We are in British India, Moslem rebels want to kill a young Hindu prince and thus killing his family blood line. The British army are charged with the task of ensuring the prince is safely escorted from the troubled provinces. The duty falls to one intrepid Captain Scott, the only chance to achieve the aim is by train, with his allies on board being a rather unique group of individuals, can Scott achieve the mission against the mounting odds?.

    North West Frontier has everything a great action adventure should have, whilst also adding in tension, drama and an array of wonderfully colourful characters. The opening to the film is pulsating, as Scott has to fight off the rebels whilst smuggling the prince and his governess out to safety. From then on we are on a train journey that is rich with enjoyment, the tension mounts among the passengers, not least because of the class and cultural differences, and perhaps allmotives are not in alignment? But they must club together if they are to survive this dangerous journey.

    Kenneth Moore, Lauren Bacall, Herbert Lom and Wilfrid Hyde-White (comedy gold when under attack) are all pulling together to make a cracking yarn. Directing duties falls to J. Lee Thompson, whose CV boasts "Ice Cold In Alex", "The Guns Of Navarone" and "Cape Fear", so this material was thankfully in very safe hands. The photography from Geoffrey Unsworth is top notch, barren and desolate landscapes beautifully realising the peril of the passengers' journey, whilst the music from Mischa Spoliansky leaves a lasting impression.

    This train may well be crammed full of genre stereotypes, and sure enough the patronising nature of the piece is dated at the edges, but this remains a gloriously enjoyable film that the whole family can readily digest. 9/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    NORTH WEST FRONTIER is a solidly enjoyable adventure story that might well be described as a British western. The setting is India at the turn of the 20th century, with Kenneth More and Lauren Bacall tasked with rescuing a six-year-old Hindu prince from a clutch of murderous Muslims who want to kill him and thus destroy his ruling family's bloodline.

    Much of the action is centred on a train, with More and a clutch of passengers doing their very best to escape from an overwhelming horde of gun-toting enemies. And the film has a real verve to it, near-constant well-shot intrigue and suspense courtesy of director J. Lee Thompson, who would keep on directing strong action for the next thirty years of his career. It helps that it hits the ground running, offering some electric action at the opening that Hollywood can only dream of.

    The rest of the film is a nice mix of character work and suspense staples. I think the production could have had twenty minutes or even half an hour shaved off it quite easily, but it's still an above-average effort. More has a naturally likable screen presence and is one of my favourite stars of the era, and he's supported well by a spiky Bacall here. Inevitably one of the passengers is a traitor and there are no prizes for guessing who given that Herbert Lom is in the cast, but he gives a strong performance of depth and class. Wilfrid Hyde White and Ursula Jeans round out the cast, although the real scene-stealer is I.S. Johar as the lovable Gupta. Containing slightly controversial religious themes that feel just as relevant today (if not more so than in the 1950s), NORTH WEST FRONTIER is one to catch.
  • Just one heck of a fun film with a nice bit of writing in the script. The theme of the British being stuck between two fighting groups of people, Hindus and Islamic is so right for the times now (Feb 2003). Then give Miss Bacall a decent part, with Wilfred Hyde Write and Herbert Lom and the rest of a wonderful group of character actors made my train ride across the Northwest frontier a most moving experience.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I think I enjoyed this a bit more when I saw it years ago. Now that I'm so terribly sophisticated, I notice the clichés leaping out at me, fangs bared. Will the train make it, slowly creeping along the rickety bridge? Will the bus ("The Wayward Bus")? Will the car ("Murder by Death")? Will the explosive-laden truck ("Sorcerer II," "The Wages of Fear")? But, what the heck. This is a headlong adventure through the deserts and mountains of North West India in 1905. Everything shouts at you and ends in an exclamation point. The acting is outrageous. Even the fastidious Wilfred Hyde-White is outrageously fastidious. The principal heavy, Herbert Lom, sweats like a pig, an animal that he, as a Muslim, hates.

    There is an attempt on the part of the writers to inject some serious matters into the story. A boy of five is the surviving Prince of India, presumably a Hindu, while the villains are a radical Muslim sect. "Not all Muslims" support the bloody rebellion, as one character remarks. And the British colonials talk about how their presence is needed to "keep order" while all about them thousands of Indians are slaughtering each other. At the end, the young Prince gives a present to the hero, Kenneth More, but comment ruefully that someday he will have to fight the Brits. Largely because of Ghandi, the Brits, of course, eventually did leave India to its own devices. At the time, it didn't lead to an improvement since the Hindus and Moslems immediately went to war and finally split into two or three independent nations.

    This hardly matters to the colorful story of a handful of disparate men, women, and children trying to survive a three-hundred mile journey through a hostile land on a dilapidated train with one coal car and one coach. It's a generic "journey" movie that we've all seen before -- in "Stagecoach" and elsewhere, but it's a lot of fun. I love those old narrow-gauge Indian trains with their diminutive piping whistles.

    Do they get to the end of their journey successfully and (mostly) in one piece? Two old puff-puffs pulling my extremities in opposite directions couldn't get me to spill the beans.
  • Long it is and utterly dreary. A Prince has to be taken away to safety from rebels, and of course Kenneth More is on hand to do the job. Lauren Bacall joins him for no good real reason other than there had to be a female lead to balance More, and various well known actors of the time are in the train that has to get them out of danger. Bacall walks through the role and does not exactly shine, and the ' love ' gestures towards More are frankly embarrassing. The whole film is one of the late Fifties and Sixties films that had to be long, long , long and scenes are protracted beyond their needs. I class several David Lean films among these, and no doubt it was yet again an effort to get people away from their television screens. The film takes place in India, but I am not completely sure but it may have been Spain. Maybe some scenes were filmed in India as the cast apparently fell ill. If you want to kill unwanted time watch it.
  • The movie opens in a way Hollywood could never do, just more dramatic and colourful than Hollywood does. This movie gave more back than I expected. It is a breathtaking, breathholding, exciting little movie. You feel like you are really there in India, on the rickety old train. I love that they used old machinery instead of making it unrealistic the way Hollywood might.

    I was not expecting much from Lauren Bacall but she also gave back more than was required. Her scenes with the young Indian boy are touching. She obviously has a way with children in real life as well. The song Swing, Swing Together could make me weep, it's so wonderful. The movie is not well known but so well done. It's just a very well done one that everyone can enjoy. There are some questionable characters on the train, you are left wondering why this one is so twitchy, what is that one's secret?
  • J Lee Thompson was regarded as workmanlike director but this film along with The Guns of Navarone launched him to the big time.

    The film is set in 1905, there is feuding between Muslims and Hindus as insinuated in the film, a divide and conquer philosophy promulgated by the British. Captain Scott (Kenneth More) is charged with the safety of a young Hindu Prince who he has to take to Delhi. They take off on a train but it will be an eventful ride.

    The film was made in 1959 yet the film is rather modern and cynical in the way it discusses colonialism, communal rivalries, even the arms trade. At the same time is also has views that probably resonated in the post war period in which it was made. The colonial superiority that some people have such as Ursula Jeans, the Governor's wife in the film. The British brought civilisation over with them, as if the Taj Mahal was built by magic.

    The film was shot in location is Spain, India and in the studio in England. The opening scenes were shot in the Amber Fort in Rajasthan and as we went there the fort did look familiar to us. Tension mounts as we then go to the claustrophobic atmosphere of the train as we find out more about the characters. Herbert Lom plays a cynical journalist, Lauren Bacall the prince's American governess with an enlightened attitude, Wilfrid Hyde White as a diplomat, Eugene Deckers as an arms dealer.

    We find contrasts in attitudes which drives the film along with the action as the rebels advance. Thompson directs with a sure touch in keeping the film thrilling. An enjoyable action yarn.
  • goldfinger2a-210 June 2002
    Yes this is British Cinema at it`s best, a rousing Northwest Frontier picture with all the right ingredients, lots of 'goodies', a real 'baddie', and a dashing hero, with a fiesty female lead in the form of Lauren Bacall.

    Things do pile up on the characters in the old train as it goes from place to place in an effort to save a young Prince, but things never go over the top, and the acting is first rate, as well as the direction.

    Do try and see the full version, some TV companies show a cut down version and you do loose important points.

    Kenneth More is as always top rate, also note worthy is I.S.Johor as the train driver, Wilfred Hyde White as the British Diplomat, and Herbert Lom as as bad a baddie as l have ever seen him....
  • Kingslaay18 October 2020
    It's quite a treat to watch a well made historical film. North West Frontier serves that purpose. We have some top performances by Ken More and Lauren Becall and a great historical setting. Suspense and drama is built up well and you're captured from start to finish. The ambush and attacks feel very real and being set in India gave it an authentic feel. Bonus points for some shocking scenes like the train massacre that brought this film to life and made it gritty. Overall a good watch. 7.5/10
  • In this age of remakes and plundering classics to create mega mall blockbusters, here is one film that not only deserves major adventure status all on it's exciting and superb own, it is ripe for a 're-imagining' as perhaps an Indiana Jones film. NORTHWEST FRONTIER is a train chase movie, something movie audiences love. Always a thrilling and spectacular way to offer a microcosm of a society and analyze it through the behavior of the characters as they weave their way through trouble. Read other comments for the story. With a stellar cast, a panavision location of the Indian desert and mountains, visually thrilling 'rattly old train in peril' stunts, some startling political dramas, ambush and shootouts, punch-ups on a speeding carriage and a truly terrifying upsetting 'walk' through the aftermath of a massacre...etc this is the one adventure film of the past 50 years that is both British to its bootstraps and a big screen audience pleaser. It is a crime that the DVD release is NOT in panavision (what is wrong with these DVD companies?) ...almost as much a social crime that NORTHWEST FRONTIER is not a famous classic of International cinema. If it is on TV anytime of the day or night, watch it and be as thrilled as anyone like me who champions it. Sometimes listed as FLAME OF India, it was directed by J Lee Thompson who later made the visually thrilling chase adventure BITE THE BULLET in 1975 (also with great train scenes) ...if NORTHWEST FRONTIER was made in 2006 exactly the same as it appears already, it would gross $100 million and be a big fat hit. If you ever get to see the wonderful Republic film from 1953 called FAIR WIND TO JAVA it too is a unappreciated adventure spectacular, also a source of 'Indiana Jones" antics and a seagoing companion piece to this great train chase.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I have often thought that, under different historical circumstances, the story of the Empire might have taken on the same significance to the British film industry as the story of the American West did to Hollywood. As things were, the imperial adventure story never achieved anything like the cinematic status of the Western, for a number of reasons. (Comparative lack of resources, post-imperial guilt and a lack of any suitable locations in Britain that could stand in for India or Africa in the same way that the Californian desert just outside Los Angeles could stand in for Texas, New Mexico or virtually any other Western state without too many people noticing).

    The few imperial epics that were made often owed much to the Western. The Tyrone Power vehicle "Untamed" was essentially the standard wagon-train plot transferred from the prairies to the South African veldt, with the Zulus playing the role normally played by the American Indians. "North West Frontier" similarly takes a Western plot and transfers it to British-ruled India in the late nineteenth or early twentieth century. The plot in question is that of "Stagecoach" or "Hombre"- a small group of dissimilar people forced by fate to travel together in a dangerous journey through hostile territory. (The director J Lee Thompson had the previous year made another film of this sort, the Second World War drama "Ice-Cold in Alex"). A Hindu ruler loyal to the British has been murdered by Muslim rebels who are also seeking to kill his young son. Captain Scott, a British army officer, has the task of escorting the boy to safety through rebel-held territory aboard the only conveyance available, a train pulled by an elderly locomotive. With them are a motley group of individuals, including the boy's American governess, a Dutch journalist, an arms trader and the Indian engine-driver. As is normal with films of this nature, the small group of passengers is quite deliberately used as a symbolic microcosm of society- as the journalist Van Leyden says "Our little train is like our little world, trundling through space." When the film was made in 1959, India and Pakistan had been independent for just over a decade, and there was much debate in Britain (and other European countries) about the rights and wrongs of decolonisation in Africa and other parts of the Empire. (The strife between Hindus and Muslims depicted in the film reflects similar events that had occurred at the time of the partition of India into two states in 1947). It is, therefore, not surprising that the film-makers took the opportunity to examine the ethics of imperialism. What is perhaps more surprising is that the film takes a relatively generous view of the British Empire. Scott defends imperialism on the grounds that strong British rule is needed to keep the peace in India. His main adversary is the journalist Van Leyden who criticises the British for their arrogance and supports the right of the Indian people to self-determination, but in the end it is Scott who proves to be the cool-headed hero and Van Leyden a villainous religious fanatic. I would agree with the reviewer who saw a similarity between Van Leyden and Otto Lutz, the outsider-figure in "Ice-Cold in Alex", even though Otto is a basically decent man who just happens to be fighting on the wrong side.

    Kenneth More had a limited range as an actor, and could be embarrassingly bad when he tried to go outside that range. (His Irish seaman in "Our Girl Friday" is a case in point). He could, however, be excellent in playing stiff-upper-lipped British gentlemen, especially officers in the armed forces, and he is very good here as Scott, a man determined to do his duty in trying circumstances. (Is the surname a reference to the fact that one of More's first starring roles was in "Scott of the Antarctic"?) Herbert Lom makes a suitably oily Van Leyden, allowing hints of his unpleasant nature to come through even when he seems to be in the right. I was less impressed with Lauren Bacall's governess. It has always struck me that her greatest role was as Mrs Humphrey Bogart and that, although she gave occasional good performances (such as Bond Rogers in "The Shootist") her star quality tended to decline from the mid-fifties onwards. The one character that I really disliked was the subservient Indian train driver, Gupta, who I thought came across as a patronising stereotype.

    Seen as political commentary or as a character study, the film is too simplistic to be convincing. As a straightforward adventure story, however, it is a very good one, generating a good deal of tension as the travellers desperately try and overcome all the hazards that stand between them and safety. The scene which particularly stood out for me was the one where they have to try and cross the damaged viaduct high above the valley. "North West Frontier" is not in the same class as "Stagecoach" or some of Thompson's other films such as "Ice-Cold in Alex" or "Tiger Bay", but it is nevertheless an enjoyable one. 7/10
  • I like this film not only for the excellent acting by its stars but for its robust, no-nonsense stance on sensitive issues like imperialism and religious conflict. Kenneth More plays the likeable, plucky brit whose stiff upper lip and business-like approach to solving problems is an example to us all. Lauren Bacall is her usual enchanting self, but my highest praise for character acting goes to I S Johar (Gupta). He brings copious helpings of humour to the film as an antidote to Lom's dark and sombre broodings. 10 out of 10.
  • A British adventure; A story set in 1905 in the North West province of British India, about a British officer who saves an Indian Hindu prince from an uprising with further obstacles in their way in Muslim territory. This is a dynamic and suspenseful film, stunningly photographed. The story reflects cultural attitudes from turn-of-the-century colonials to natives under occupation; the heroics are shared by all. Kenneth More handles his leading role with ease and aplomb. Lauren Bacall is personable and Herbert Lom is wonderfully shady. There is fine support from other supporting players, especially I. S. Johar as the jolly and reliable engine driver.
  • Over the years this movie, along with Shane, The Great Escape and Casablanca, has remained one of my favorites and never disappoints on repeated viewings. Kenneth More represents the quintessential decent Englishman determined to do his duty to king and country, a role in which he always excelled.

    All the cast are magnificent, including Lauren Bacall, Wilfred Hyde-White. Herbert Lom, and (stealing every scene he was in) the Indian actor I.S. Johar as Gupta.

    J Lee Thompson keeps the scenes moving at a galloping pace and provides a textbook example of how to keep viewers on the edges of their seats and get them involved in the lives and characters at the centerof the drama.

    I cannot understand why this movie is not among the top 250 IMDb movies of all time. It has few equals, and is far superior (in terms of story line, acting and directing) than "The Shawshank Redemption" (which, while absorbing and well acted, has a ridiculous storyline)
  • J. Lee Thompson's adventure (retitled FLAME OVER India) is a dramatic tale of an hazardous train journey to take Indian Prince Kishan (Govind Raja Ross) out of the clutch of Muslim rebels and into safety. The passengers comprise a diverse group - the brave soldier Captain Scott (Kenneth More), the feisty doctor's wife (Lauren Bacall), the impassive governor's spouse (Ursula Jeans), a British bureaucrat (Wilfrid Hyde White), an arms-dealer (Eugene Deckers) and a Dutch journalist (Herbert Lom) who turns out to be a saboteur in disguise.

    Thrillingly photographed by Geoffrey Unsworth in India, NORTH-WEST PASSAGE contains some spectacular sequences as the beaten-up old train plows across the Indian landscape under Gupta's (I. S. Johar's) control. Frequently attacked by Muslim rebels, who are seen galloping towards the train on horseback, the passengers manage to repel them with a combination of luck and sheer courage. The film does contain its fair share of stereotypes: Hyde-White's Bridie is suave yet naive; Jeans does a fair job of sustaining her stiff upper lip in the face of adversity; while Bacall shows a commendable disdain for British authority (as an American, she is accustomed to having her own way).

    Yet the film is a fascinating product of its time, as it tries to transmit a liberal message at a time when the British Empire was in the process of breaking up. More's Captain Scott is both brave yet fair (it is no coincidence that his name should recall that of the intrepid polar explorer, immortalized in SCOTT OF THE ANTARCTIC (1948)), and tries his best to look after the Prince. While Lom's Van Leyden possesses violent instincts, he continually castigates the British for their desire to divide and rule: what is evident from the Governor's wife's behavior, both towards the Prince and to a little Indian baby they find on the way, is that she is not interested in power, but rather trying to help people in distress. Likewise Bacall makes every effort to look after the Prince, as well as helping Scott out when all seems lost. Whereas the British are still in power - the action takes place in 1905, some forty-three years before India gained independence - they are more than willing to share it, and thereby ensure that everyone is entitled to equal treatment under the law. Such policies were also pursued at the end of the Fifties (when the film was released) as the British oversaw a series of peaceful transitions to independent government in both Africa and Asia.
  • Of course the british thought they ruled the world but herbert lom was once again out to prove them wrong ... i can't conceive why anyone would want lom in anything other than a comic book adventure but he was cast in this film as the protagonist ... by all good fortune he failed ... lauren bacall was superb as always ... kenneth more does his usual yeoman job, which isn't much ... the young lad that played the prince was the real hero
An error has occured. Please try again.