Add a Review

  • "The Young Philadelphians" begins on an odd note. A lady marries--only to have her new hubby say that he CAN'T consummate the marriage! I THINK this was implying he was a homosexual--but it was so vague you wonder if the man just didn't have a penis. All I know is that she stormed out--and later that night he killed himself. In the time between, she met with her old boyfriend (Brian Keith) and I THINK they implied they had sex. And, if we are to believe this odd build up, she became pregnant that night. The lady's brand-new mother-in-law wants to take the child and raise him herself--but the mother vows to do it without her dead husband's family's money. Years pass and the child is now a good looking college student (Paul Newman) who works for Keith (who you assume is his biological father). All this vagueness thanks to 1950s standards--which, in the case of this film, tended to weaken the narrative. I just wish they'd been a lot more explicit and this is by far the worst aspect of the film.

    As for the rest of the film, it's very, very good. It's all about Newman and his rise as a lawyer in Philadelphia--and his dealings with the city's elite families. Much of the film simply chronicles his life events--his first love, his attending law school, military service and his rise through the ranks in the legal field. Despite this sounding rather pedestrian, it isn't--Newman did a great job and the script is very well written and with excellent dialog.

    Later in the film, Newman has finally worked his way to being a very well-respected and successful lawyer. He has a chance to go into politics, marry a gorgeous women from the best of families and he has every reason to be happy. However, out of the blue, a new case comes along--one that could upset all of his plans. What's he to do? Overall, it's a film that is very, very good but with a small re-write it could have been a lot better. Either making the first portion tighter would have helped or simply eliminating this soap opera-like plot would have made the film stronger. But, looking past this, the film is still a very good and often overlooked Newman vehicle.

    By the way, a few final points. My daughter saw this film with me and said that the small portion that takes place at the University of Pennsylvania looks like it was filmed at the school--as she recognized some of the buildings. Although IMDb doesn't say it was filmed there, it does say that the filmmakers did a good job making it look right. Also, to my knowledge, it's the only film I've ever seen about a tax attorney--and I'll have to tell my friend, Terri (a tax lawyer) about it! Finally, although I sometimes have disliked Billie Burke in films as she sometimes dominated the film too much with her ditsy act, here her bit part was fantastic--and used very effectively. I loved her in the film.
  • The Young Philadelphians is a curious mixture of Ross Hunter like soap opera together with a Tennessee Williams like hero and surprisingly enough it works most of the time.

    Paul Newman is the hero whose very existence on the planet is a source of scandal. His mother Diane Brewster was disinherited by her husband's family when he killed himself on their wedding night. Newman's had to scrap for what's his in the world and isn't above using the bedroom to advance himself.

    He's got a friend in Robert Vaughn who's also a black sheep in his Philadelphia Main Line family who gets himself in a jackpot when he's arrested for murdering his uncle. Newman, who's a tax lawyer, gets some on the job training in a criminal case, in defending Vaughn.

    Like Katharine Hepburn in Suddenly Last Summer, characters like John Williams, Robert Douglas, and Frank Conroy seem above all to want to protect the family name. Hepburn was willing enough to have a lobotomy performed on Elizabeth Taylor and this crew seems ready willing and eager to send Vaughn to prison or the electric chair for the same reasons. Straight out of Tennessee Williams.

    Newman shows some of the flash in his courtroom scenes, especially in his examination of Richard Deacon that he later showed in his Oscar nominated The Verdict which is my personal Paul Newman favorite. He trips Deacon the witness up with a piece of legal wizardry worthy of Perry Mason.

    In the prologue of the film when the death of Adam West is shown on his wedding night to Diane Brewster the film is very discreet as to his reasons for doing what he did. It's explained this was a marriage arranged by his mother for the purpose of carrying on the family name even if it meant wedding a girl not from their crowd. He explains he has no interest in his wife and promptly goes out and dies in a speeding car crash. Today it would be far more explicit to say that maybe Adam West's character was gay. But we had the code in place back then and gay was invisible.

    Robert Vaughn got an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actor and his harrowing scenes with Newman in the drunk tank got him that. He lost to Hugh Griffith for Ben-Hur, but it was the first real notice he got and the start of a long career. Look for good performances by Alexis Smith as the older woman Newman woos, Billie Burke as the daffy dowager, and Barbara Rush whose on and off relationship with Newman guides most of the film.

    The Young Philadelphians is kind of old fashioned today, somewhat dated, but still is good entertainment and recommended here.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In Warners' "The Young Philadelphians," Newman plays a young lawyer who abandons all values in search of success… Directed by Vincent Sherman, who had made some of Joan Crawford's tough career-woman vehicles, this slick soap opera actually finds Newman in a Crawford role...

    Tony Lawrence is born into poverty, and his mother brings him up to believe that social position, good contacts and money are all that matter… At first he resists, but events harden him into a cynical opportunist, and he sets out on an amoral journey to the top of his law firm… He double-crosses, romances and ingratiates himself to success, but loses all his youthful idealism, and becomes unhappy with himself… Finally deciding that success isn't worth, the price, he chooses integrity, risking the enmity of a prominent family by defending an alcoholic friend…

    Tony, the ruthless opportunist, is superficially another Ben Quick ("The Long, Hot Summer"), but here the writing is superficially and Newman responds with an appropriately routine portrayal… He goes through the motions well, conveying the smiling, eager innocent at the beginning, and the intense, jaded conniver later on… But it's all on the surface, with no depth of feeling… Tony doesn't even have the underlying devilish charm, only an attractive face… And at crucial moments—when Tony's girl marries another man and when he finds out who his real father is—Newman falls back on heavy breathing, rapid blinking and feverish lip movements…

    Barbara Rush gives her best performance as the depressed, cynical, high society daughter of one of Philadelphia's most prominent attorney Gilbert Dickson (John Williams).

    Robert Vaughn is excellent as the alcoholic victim, cheated and inherited...

    Billia Burke is delightful as the old millionairess whom Tony wins her trust by persuading her to transfer the administration of her possessions to a firm that could save her 'some' taxes...

    "The Young Philadelphians" is Vincent Sherman's best film of the fifties, with excellent supporting cast specially by Alexis Smith as the dissatisfied wife of an aging lawyer collaborating in unifying the arguments of the dramatic action...

    With 3 Academy Award Nominations for Best Supporting Actor (Vaughn), Best Cinematography and Best Costume Design, the film is gleamingly done and acted with assurance...
  • Warning: Spoilers
    By 1959, Paul Newman's career was moving into high gear, with CAT ON A HOT TIN ROOF, THE LONG, HOT SUMMER, and SOMEBODY UP THERE LIKES ME all critical and commercial successes. Even his harshest critics grudgingly admitted he was far more than just a "Brando look-alike" (as he had been labeled in his first films), but his contract to Warner Bros. Forced him to also appear in potboilers (THE HELEN MORGAN STORY), and misguided comedies (RALLY 'ROUND THE FLAG, BOYS!), and Newman was chafing at the bit to be able to pick and choose his own projects.

    Vincent Sherman's THE YOUNG PHILADELPHIANS, the last film under Newman's WB contract, proved to be one of the best, and he showed the dazzling sexuality and near-arrogant confidence that would mark many of his films of the next decade. As Anthony Judson Lawrence, illegitimate son of Brian Keith (performed with a brogue and a wink, as Keith was, actually, less than 4 years older than Newman), and social climbing mother Diane Brewster, he carried the name of an 'upper crust' father (Adam West, as wooden as he would be in "Batman"), whose homosexuality had been carefully hidden and whose inability to 'perform' and suicidal death on his wedding night would result in a 'deal' between mother and in-laws; the boy could keep the name, but would not have access to the family fortune.

    Flashing ahead a few years, Lawrence is a strapping, 'blue collar' kind of guy, much to the chagrin of his mother, who hopes that his name will gain him inroads into Philadelphia 'society'. Working construction with his (yet unknown to him) birth father, between semesters at law school, he meets pretty socialite Joan Dickinson (Barbara Rush), who quickly falls for his sweaty, sexy charm. Lawrence's best friend, to his mother's relief, is alcoholic fellow student 'Chet' Gwynn (Robert Vaughn, in an Oscar-nominated role), heir of another elite family, who sees in Lawrence a personal courage he lacks. Vaughn's performance is a film highlight, quite similar to Lew Ayres' role in HOLIDAY, twenty years earlier, through the early part of the film.

    Young Lawrence is fighting his mother's battle for acceptance, and, in the first of several 'upwardly mobile' decisions, he postpones a quick marriage to Joan, in return for help in his law career. While he is convinced the delay would help the two of them, it costs him her love. Bitterly, he decides to 'play the game', using whatever means necessary to get ahead. With a brief interruption by the Korean War, his career flourishes, aided by a willingness to use 'inside' information to obtain a choice clerking appointment, while toying with a near-affair with the 'younger' wife of the aged lawyer he is studying with (Alexis Smith, gloriously beautiful at 38). When he achieves a spot in a prestigious law firm, he 'woos' a major client (Billie Burke) over to him. With unscrupulous ease, he reaches a pinnacle his mother had only dreamed of.

    But Lawrence's world is about to come crashing down, as Gwynn, his college friend, crippled in Korea, has been arrested for murder, and begs the lawyer to represent him. The trial promises to expose the seamy underbelly of Philadelphia society, revealing secrets that could destroy many lives, including his own.

    Lawrence faces a moral dilemma, whether to save his friend, or preserve the fiction of his own life...

    Entertaining and at times powerful, THE YOUNG PHILADELPHIANS is a fitting conclusion to the early stage of Paul Newman's career; ahead was EXODUS, and a decade of roles that would cement his position as a superstar!
  • This unbelievable (but no less enjoyable) legal soap opera comes complete with dark family secrets, coincidental encounters, tragic misunderstandings, and a courtroom finish Hitchcock might have loved, in which the fate of a man perhaps wrongly charged with murder waits to be decided by a butler's sense of smell. Paul Newman stars as a young lawyer rising through Philadelphia society using his wits, his charm, and a few unscrupulous tactics never taught in law school, and Barbara Rush is the hot-and-cold love interest. But Robert Vaughn steals the film playing an unfortunate friend who, in less than two hours of screen time, descends from an amiable barfly to a crippled war veteran to a skid row derelict facing the electric chair.
  • It has commonly been said that full-fledged soap opera can never be a real work of art, but this excellent film proves to be a glorious exception to that rule. Director Vincent Sherman's luminous film adaptation of author Richard Powell's best-seller THE PHILADELPHIANS manages to tell the story of at least two generations in a single picture without ever feeling cramped, forced, or haphazard. The film's story line that begins as a romance, evolves into an underdog business story, and ends as a courtroom drama, and Sherman impressively manages to take all of these various story threads and create a completely coherent motion picture that never feels disjointed or episodic. Sherman also keeps things movie at a remarkably brisk pace – the film never feels even half as long as it's 136-minute runtime.

    The entire cast turns in superlative work, with Newman being particular well-suited to his role as a good-natured-but-flawed lawyer (he would return to this type of role with even better results in the 1982 classic THE VERDICT). Barbara Rush, Brian Keith, Dianne Brewster, Billie Burke, and Robert Vaughn are all excellent, and Alexis Smith is particularly memorable as sexy socialite. Speaking of sex, the film retains a surprisingly sensual aura throughout, which helps to keep it from aging for modern audiences. Inexplicably forgotten by many classic film fans, THE YOUNG PHILADELPHIANS is a moving, compelling motion picture that holds up remarkably well nearly fifty years after it's original release.
  • Vincent Sherman directed this long but interesting drama that stars Paul Newman as Anthony Judson Lawrence, an ambitious young man in Philadelphia society who rises from construction foreman to law school student with a good offer of employment that is interrupted by the Korean War, which sees Tony distinguish himself even more. After his discharge, he resumes his successful career, finding love along the way. There is a sad development when old friend(and fellow war veteran) 'Chet'(played by Robert Vaughn) has fallen on hard times, now an alcoholic accused of murder, and wanting Anthony to defend him, despite his inexperience... Despite the potential simple soap opera story, this is a well acted and written film that is surprisingly interesting. Glossy but entertaining.
  • The Young Philadelpians which was made in 1959 is tame by today's standards; out-dated for sure. Yet, when it was made it was not only controversial, but very daring for it's time; dealing with homosexuality, child-birth out of wed-lock, mental illness, adultery, suicide and alcohol abuse.

    Paul Newman was out-standing in the role of Anthony Judson Lawrence, a career driven lawyer, whose mother is hiding a deep dark secret. Newman is at his physical prime; handsome and lean. Everyone in this classic black and white soap opera was great. Just a really entertaining rainy night movie.
  • "The Young Philadelphians" is like an entire thirty-year soap opera crammed into one two-hour movie.

    Paul Newman had my wife salivating as a young hotshot attorney who learns to balance his ambition with his morals. She couldn't decide if he was hotter as a sweaty construction worker in an early scene or as a dapper man about town in a tux later in the film. I think she would have thought he was hot if he had appeared wrapped in newspaper. But if fetching females are more your thing, no worries, as Barbara Rush is incredibly appealing as his love interest. They have sizzling chemistry in their first scenes together, which makes it a bit of a disappointment when Rush falls out of the film for long periods of time, and their contentious relationship is one of the movie's more tiresome story lines.

    Robert Vaughn received a Best Supporting Actor Academy Award nomination for playing Newman's dissolute friend who he ends up defending in a murder trial. Vaughn gets to play most of his scenes as an unshaven raving alcoholic, so no wonder he was nominated for an Oscar. The best actual performance in the movie, or at least the most memorable one, probably comes from Billie Burke in a small role as a goofy society lady who deftly steals the movie right out from under everybody just by making smoochy faces at her dog.

    This is an entertaining yarn of a movie, but don't expect to be too intellectually taxed.

    "The Young Philadelphians" was also nominated for Best Black & White Cinematography and Costume Design, back when it was common to nominate costume designers for creating attractive evening wear in contemporary movies.

    Grade: B+
  • Set in Philadelphia society in the 1940s/1950s. The two leads- Newman and Rush are excellent, but it is Vaughan as Newman's alcoholic buddy who gives the best performance- he was nominated for an Oscar. Billie Burke as the rich, eccentric little old lady is a delight. Alexis Smith as the attractive frustrated wife married to Newman's elderly boss gives a great performance. Several of the other supporting players- Keith, Picerni, John Williams as Rush's father, and Krueger as Newman's boss are excellent. I own the video and have watched the movie numerous times.
  • The Young Philadelphians had all the ingredients to become the most horrid American melodrama, in the worst 1950's style. Instead, it was cooked up to be one of the fine 1950's movies.

    William Lawrence III (Adam West) was not, indeed could not be, the father of young Tony (Paul Newman). After William kills himself in a horrible car crash (suicide?), his Mother wants Kate (Diane Brewster) to give up the family name for her and her baby boy. Because she could reveal the reason for this horrid condition (Gasp! Is it possible that the marriage was not consummated because William the third could only "do it" with boys?), Kate secures the Lawrence name, if not the Lawrence money, to give Anthony a chance in Philadelphia society. Can you see the most awful melodrama developing?

    Well, it turns out that further developments provide us with a balanced mix of humor, cynicism, drama, real emotions. This movie shows first rate acting and directing, and superb black and white photography. It gives us a glimpse of what appeared to be a pretty gruesome society scene. Apart from the unlikely happy end (I'm not giving too much away by saying this about an American movie of the 1950's), this is an interesting incursion in the period, with a healthy dose of social realism. As a bonus, we get to see Paul Newman out of his shirt in a steamy scene with a frustrated woman married with Newman's much older boss, a delightful Billy Burke in one of her last screen appearances, a tortured Adam West trying to deal with... (Oh! no, I can't say it), and a whole cast of believable, if not overly subtle, characters. We even get a bit of courtroom drama, à la Perry Mason.

    This is an excellent way to spend a lazy Sunday afternoon...
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Paul Newman at his best in this 1959 film dealing with a young lawyer's climb to the top and the woman who abandoned him for family considerations-he wasn't part of their social circle.

    After achieving social status, Newman discovers who his father really is, as he is becoming involved in defending a friend accused of murder.

    Barbara Rush is very good as the war widow who knew she made a mistake in spurning Paul and Robert Vaughn turned in an Oscar nominated supporting performance as the friend, who lost an arm in battle and came home as an alcoholic, accused of murder, he is being written off by this family. You feel Vaughn's torment, especially in the prison scenes. In a year that Hugh Griffith copped the coveted Oscar for "Ben-Hur," consideration certainly should have been given to Vaughn, if not Ed Wynn's memorable characterization in "The Diary of Anne Frank."

    Billie Burke, as the wealthy dowager looking to save on her taxes, was phenomenal here. With that high-pitched voice, I thought I was back with her 19 years before when she portrayed Glinda, the good witch, in "The Wizard of Oz."

    This film of love, social status and family intrigue, is quiet good.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Directed by Vincent Sherman, and written by James Gunn who adapted Richard Powell's intricate novel, it features (supporting actor) Robert Vaughn's only Academy Award nominated performance. Harry Stradling Sr.'s B&W Cinematography received a nomination as did Howard Shoup's Costume Design. The story begins with wedding night jitters (allusion to homosexuality) followed by an illegitimate birth, but its focus is on class distinctions, lawyering, and sex. It ends with Vaughn's character on trial for murder and a courtroom drama. The plot is compelling; its pace and intricacy make the film's 135 minute runtime fly by.

    Kate (Diane Brewster) marries William Lawrence III (Adam West) for his money in lieu of the working class 'stiff' she really loves, construction worker Mike Flanagan (Brian Keith). But after a brief disillusioning moment on her wedding night - her newlywed husband seems ill equipped to consummate their marriage, says he's been living a lie and runs out on her after a brief, forced kiss - she returns to Mike, who apparently has no problem finishing the job. When Kate wonders home to her mother at 4 AM, she learns that she's a young widow - her husband had been killed when his too-fast- traveling car crashed. Nine months later when Kate is recovering from childbirth, Mrs. Lawrence (Isobel Elsom) visits her, knowing all too well that the baby can't be her son's child. But instead of taking a payoff, Kate informs her ex-mother-in-law that she'll be keeping the family name and calling her son Anthony Judson Lawrence. Later, when Mike arrives to propose to her, class conscious Kate won't have him and insists that he not return; over the years, she uses the Lawrence name to serve on high society committees, and sacrifices to provide the best for her son.

    When Anthony (Paul Newman) is in his early twenties, he's a scholar at Princeton about to graduate and enter law school; he does construction work for Mike during summers. On the job one day he meets and helps Joan Dickinson (Barbara Rush), who'd just been in a fender bender. Later, attending a society party with his inebriated best friend 'Chet' Gwynn (Vaughn), he bumps into her again. She's dating Carter Henry (Fred Eisley), who's worth $20 million but has yet to propose to her. Joan and Anthony hit it off and begin dating while Carter's away for the summer. They fall in love and at the end of the summer, when Anthony's about to return to college, Jane meets with Chet to ask him how she could keep him. He advises her to use the old fashioned way (get pregnant). Jane then succeeds in getting Anthony interested enough to propose but, on their way to eloping, they're stopped by her father, one of the city's most celebrated lawyers Gilbert Dickinson (John Williams). Dickinson manipulates the situation by volunteering to be Anthony's preceptor and then offering him a to-die-for future that includes a position with his firm that should eventually lead to a partnership if he'll only wait until June (the end of the next school year) to marry his daughter. Anthony jumps at the offer but allows Mr. Dickinson to explain the arrangement to Jane which, of course, he presents in a different light, making her feel like she'd been being used by Anthony.

    By Christmastime, Anthony meets with Dickinson and learns that Jane, who'd stopped writing him, has married Carter after all. Naturally, he then goes to get drunk with his pal Chet. Later, however, he decides to get even. He hears from a fellow student, Louis Donetti (Paul Picerni) that John Marshall Wharton (Otto Kruger), a partner in a prestigious law firm, is working on a Sherman Anti-Trust brief, so he schemes to get the internship in part by charming the old lawyer's much younger wife Carol (Alexis Smith). But an affair between Anthony and Carol never really develops and, realizing his pupil's restraint, Wharton offers the young graduate a position, which proves to be fairly boring for him until Mrs. J. Arthur Allen (Billie Burke) walks in one day with her small dog, the following Christmas.

    Burke is a delight, playing a wealthy widow, who's still managing her husband's oil company fortune, the way she played so many dizzy but "wise" roles in those 1930's screwball classics. Mrs. Allen had been a client of Dickinson's firm, but Anthony coyly wins her business by saving her money on taxes, impressing (her) and ultimately reconciling and reuniting with Dickinson's daughter Jane, now the widowed Mrs. Henry. Ten years had passed and Anthony had served in the war with Chet, who'd lost an arm; Carter had been killed in the conflict after he'd volunteered to serve per problems at home.

    Now Chet, who'd always been a problem - a spoiled and neglected youth of affluent but now deceased parents whose estate is controlled by his disapproving uncle Morton Stearnes (Robert Douglas) and Doctor Stearnes (Frank Conroy), a purveyor of the "genes vs. environment" theory - is accused of murdering his uncle. Of course Chet wants his ill-suited corporate lawyer friend Anthony to represent him against District Attorney Donetti. Even though trying the case may hurt his reputation and position in society, like running for the city council which had been proposed by Mike and Donetti some time earlier, Anthony is loyal to a fault and decides to do so against everyone but Jane's wishes. But Doctor Stearnes, who'd been privy to certain information from Mrs. Lawrence, visits Kate and more or less threatens to reveal her son's questionable past if Anthony stains their family's name in court. Still, Anthony is able to discredit the state's star witness, Morton's butler George (Richard Deacon), during cross examination. He then introduces the possibility of suicide with Doctor Stearnes on the stand to ultimately win the day, saving his friend while living up to Jane's high expectations, bringing her to tears, and the melodrama to a satisfactory conclusion.
  • tedr011327 November 2006
    2/3 of this movie is very good. Nothing profound but enjoyable in much the same way as the also-Newman starring "From The Terrace". Especially enjoyable is the always enjoyable Billie Burke (if you haven't seen it, catch the marvelous "The Young In Heart"). Then...it devolves into a pedestrian court room drama. The ending is never in doubt and just getting there is a slow slog. This is no slight on Richard Deacon, who does well with his role as a fussy butler. There just isn't enough interest in what happens. The key plot point on whether Newman will do something to endanger his career is just diluted to the point of indifference. The movie simply needed a better ending. Otherwise, there's nothing offensive here and nothing to tax the brain. Amongst the cast, John Williams stands out in my eyes. Robert Vaughn got the Oscar nomination for one chew-the-scenery scene that left me unmoved. So, I'd skip this one and stick with "Terrace"
  • Absolutely agree about the high quality of Oscar-nominee Robert Vaughn's performance. It must be his finest movie moment. And Barbara Rush does herself proud, too. Film's reality holds up even 40 years later; one of the era's more credible dramatizations.
  • kenjha4 July 2010
    Rising young lawyer faces ethical and moral issues as he tries to defend a college buddy charged with murder. The movie wanders on too long, feeling like a season's worth of a soap opera condensed into a feature film. As soap opera, it's neither very absorbing nor deliciously trashy, but instead occupies the ho-hum middle ground. Newman is by turns earnest, ambitious, bitter, greedy, and noble. He heads a large cast featuring familiar faces, but the acting is uneven. With its episodic construction, the climactic courtroom scene is rather poorly executed and seems more like something that has been tacked on instead of something that the film builds towards.
  • ... by not marrying his father in the first place. Let me explain.

    Kate Judson (Diane Brewster) marries socialite Bill Lawrence (Adam West... yes THAT Adam West). Kate marries him because her mother wants the marriage into high society. But apparently, Bill is gay. The film comes as close to saying that as you could in 1959. He runs out of the honeymoon suite. Kate runs to the man she really loves, construction company owner Mike Flanagan (Brian Keith). When she returns home later that night she learns Bill has died in an accident. Nine months later a son is born. But the mother in law has PIs all over the place and tells Kate she knows this is not her grandson and offers to pay her off as long as she and the baby relinquish the Lawrence name. Kate refuses, because the Lawrence name will open doors for her son some day. She also refuses to marry the father whom she loves, because "people will talk" and possibly figure out his real parentage.

    So the son grows up to be Paul Newman, Mike Flanagan overpays him to work at his flourishing construction business, and as he grows into manhood he is now rubbing elbows with some of the most insufferable snobs ever committed to celluloid. They lie. They cheat. They steal. They mess with him professionally and romantically. He tries to keep his honor, but they don't make it easy for him.

    If Kate had married Mike in the beginning she would have had all of the money she ever needed because Mike was very successful, avoided both her and her son's suffering, and yes, those snobs would have had nothing to do with her family, but after watching this film that seems like a plus.

    Billie Burke as a widow worth a billion dollars in today's money is hilarious. She ventures out on Christmas just to make sure her dog is mentioned in her will. Robert Vaughn is a standout as a blue blood friend of Newman's character who drinks heavily to deal with the hypocrisy of his relatives.
  • We begin with a prologue. In 1924, poor lower-class Diane Brewster (as Kate Judson) marries wealthy upper-crust Adam West (as William "Bill" Lawrence). On their honeymoon, he says, "I can't love you, Kate, I can't love anyone!" Apparently, he can't have sex. She goes crying to working class Brian Keith (as Michael "Mike" Flanagan), who she previously rejected as too poor, and becomes impregnated by him, instead. Though Mr. Keith wants to marry widow Brewster, she wants her son to grow up with the advantages of the "Lawrence" name. It doesn't make a lot of sense, but that's the back-story...

    Jumping to the present, we find Princeton class of 1947 student Paul Newman (as Anthony "Tony" Lawrence) working for Keith's construction company, while studying to become a lawyer. One of Mr. Newman's co-workers has fender-bender with beautiful Barbara Rush (as Joan Dickinson). Newman sides with Ms. Rush, probably because she is prettier than "big ape" Leonard Bremen, and they fall in love. However, Rush's upper-crust father John Williams (as Gilbert Dickinson) doesn't approve of lower-class Newman. Yes, this is a soap opera, revolving around the protagonist's climb to the top...

    Watch for Newman's alcoholic roommate and best friend Robert Vaughn (as Chester "Chet" Gwynn) to steal the movie. Taking center stage for the film's last, and most engaging, story, Mr. Vaughn received "Best Supporting Actor" consideration for his performance. The delightful Billie Burke entertains as a millionaire avoiding taxes, attractive Alexis Smith offers Rush some competition, and Richard Deacon makes a strong impression as a booze-sniffing butler. This probably should have been titled "The Young Philadelphian" (singular) as it is mainly about the character played by Paul Newman.

    ******* The Young Philadelphians (5/21/59) Vincent Sherman ~ Paul Newman, Barbara Rush, Robert Vaughn, Richard Deacon
  • Building a Hollywood resume as outstanding as he did, actor Paul Newman selected roles which in one way or another tapped his enormous talent. This movie is a prime example of that legendary persona. The Film is called " The Young Philadelphians " and is the story of Anthony Judson Lawrence (Paul Newman) who is born into an upper social class family. Although raised as an up and coming Laurence, his mother Kate (Diane Brewster) and father (Brian Keith) keep from him a dark family secret which involved his biological father (Adam West). Having graduated from a prestigious Ivy league school, believes he can contribute to his family name. However ambitious he is, there are several outside influences which seek to bar his success. There is a young lady (Joan Dickinson) whom he wishes to marry, but who's father (John Williams) is against it. Then there are the In-laws who believe Lawrence's mother is a disgrace by fathering an illegitimate child. In addition, there are faltering friends like Chester Gwynn (Robert Vaughn) who calls on him when charged with murder. Then there are influential millionaire friends like Mrs. J. Arthur Allen (Billie Burke) who is impressed with Lawrence's ability to succeed when put in real jeopardy. This happens when he is chosen as defense counsel for his friend Chester in a real life drama which endangers his family, his friends and himself if he should fail. All in all, this is one film not to be missed by fans of Paul Newman. The end result is another milestone and a definite Classic for his career. ****
  • In great form, Paul Newman plays a young lawyer doing what is needed to land a job with a big law firm. Another priority is to impress a woman blessed with beauty and money. Underhanded schemes are fair in love and law. A very interesting two hours of drama with excellent cast: Barbara Rush, Brian Keith, Alexis Smith and Robert Vaughn. Vincent Sherman directs.
  • Dated but entertaining drama with terrific cast. My only real criticism is that, as a native Philadelphian - they did not do their homework. South Philadelphia is South Philadelphia or South Philly. It has never been referred to as "South Side." We would have no clue what you are talking about!

    It is "The Main Line" - not (stand alone) "Main Line." We have police districts not precincts ( this is Philadelphia not New York). No one in this picture has a Philly accent (we're hard to miss).

    Finally, how does poor single mom who was cut out of the will and with no known income, afford a lovely townhouse while schmoozing the ladies of the Junior League, etc?? How could young Anthony afford an Ivy League college and Law School? Shouldn't he be supporting mom? Is she a "kept woman" or what?? Stretches credibility a bit!

    But it is a pleasant way to pass the time! Enjoy!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This movie came a year after Newman became a big name in movies. With 4 films in 1958 and Newman actually is one of the few stars who really got started more on live television broadcasts. This was really Paul first starring role. Like his live television, he carries this film very well.

    With Barbara Rush and Alexis Smith on for powerful female support, there are some really great moments. I especially like the moment when he turns down the advances of a married woman by telling her if they are to connect, she must divorce her older husband. This moment is played well in this movie.

    There are lots of good moments, with the only weakness being the ending. Richard Deacon is the key witness in the trial but the testimony being proof for a murder is especially weak. Robert Vaughn as the Defendant is excellent in a small role, but an important one.

    Newman fans should check this one out, as it does show how good an actor he was, and if they really want to see him at his best, try and get a hold of his live television roles on DVD. He is at his best live, I wish other than US Steel -Bang The Drum Slowly, I have never gotten to see anything live from Newman though I highly recommend that one which is on DVD.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's odd that a movie which received a great deal of publicity and controversy in its day is now virtually forgotten. The controversy centered on whether the original novel by Richard Pitts Powell had been justly treated in its screen adaptation. Most critics who had actually read the book agreed that the cinema version, despite its long running time, was but a pale, watered-down shadow which failed to come to grips with any of the social issues Powell had raised.

    However, I personally have never read the book (though I notice it is not one of these mammoth-sized epics, but has in its hardcover edition a modest 376 pages), so I can't comment on how far it's been corrupted in this slick screen version. However, expecting the worst, I was pleasantly surprised. All the principals bring a welcome charisma to their roles, whilst Sherman's direction is much more stylish than usual. Production values and technical credits are equally solid. And what's more important, the movie held my interest throughout.

    The director, Vincent Sherman, did receive a bit of attention from the auteur brigade, mainly because he replaced Robert Aldrich on The Garment Jungle (1957). A literate man whose best films were made for Warner Bros., Sherman managed to make his films sound much more exciting in retrospect than they actually were. His best films were those he made early in his career such as All Through the Night (1941), The Hard Way (1942), Old Acquaintance (1943), In Our Time (1944), Mr Skeffington (1945).
  • The Young Philadelphians is a typical Paul Newman movie. He's on the wrong side of the tracks trying to climb his way to the right side, has a chip on his shoulder because of issues with his father, and uses his bad boy charm to seduce a girl or two. You've seen these movies before, so if you don't like that formula, you won't like this one. Very little is changed. It's extremely similar to From the Terrace, so if it turns out you like it, you know which movie to rent next weekend.

    The beginning of the film is very intriguing. Diane Brewster and Brian Keith are in love, but faced with the reality of poverty, she marries wealthy Adam West instead. But when she bears Brian's child after Adam's scandalous death, she's cut off from high society. Brian wants to do the decent thing, but she forbids it. She wants her son to have Adam's name and connections, not a father who works in construction.

    When the boy grows up to be Paul Newman, Diane faces a great disappointment. He's as ambitious as she wanted him to be, but he has a love of construction and actually works under Brian. They're as close as father and son, without Paul knowing their actual relationship. Paul meets Barbara Rush, a socialite, and wants to marry her. Is it real love, though, or is it just ambition? In my favorite scene, Barbara's father pulls a "Pat Hingle". He pretends to support the young couple, but dangles a great financial opportunity above their heads instead. Remember Pat's fantastic talk with Warren Beatty in Splendor in the Grass?

    To find out the outcome of Paul and Barbara's budding romance, and to find out just how far Paul will go to achieve class and money, rent this drama. It doesn't really deviate from Paul's other film formulas, but if you like those, you won't be disappointed.
  • rmax30482328 February 2007
    Warning: Spoilers
    Richard Powell, on whose novel this movie is based, certainly knew his Philadelphia in the early 20th century. It was tradition bound in the sense that some coastlines are iron bound. And everything that deviated from that tradition was kept under cover because it was a quiet city. No scandals, no engaging corruption, no roguishness. You have to read E. Digby Baltzell's "Puritan Boston and Quaker Philadelphia" to understand the historical roots of this self-effacing character. Powell got the education part right too. The elite of Philadelphia send their sons to Princeton. If the kids go into a profession, like law, medicine, or finance, they revert to the University of Pennsylvania, which happens to have the best professional schools in the business. Those traditions seem to be dying now. The Main Line mansions that once housed people of class like Grace Kelly are now owned by basketball players and people of that ilk. Watching this movie is like looking into a time capsule.

    The film gets that part right, and that's about it. Otherwise it resembles any other sprawling trans-generational epic story in which people make mistakes then after many travails find themselves again. Family secrets, idealists turned cynics, bastardy, money, social class, love, rebellion, marrying the wrong person, multiple subplots, chicanery, other assorted familiar mishigas -- it's all here.

    I mentioned that the movie was like something that ought to be in a time capsule and that's true in more ways than one. Everything we see on the screen is old fashioned. The direction by Vincent Sherman has no pizazz whatever, not a nod in the direction of modernity. Staging is strictly functional in the sense that nobody gets in front of anybody else, and when a reaction shot is called for the editor lingers on the face for a few extra seconds to make sure we get the point. The photography is high key and has lots of fill and comes out flat. (In stark, and even welcome contrast to many of today's films in which even hospital operating rooms are in deep shadow except for the actors' faces and the hole they are bent over and peering into.) Everything seems to be shot indoors on a sound stage with perfunctory furniture and accessories. The makeup turns a pseudo-elderly Brian Keith Irishman into a caricature of Boss Tweed. The wardrobe completely lacks either realism or originality. (A butler appears on the witness stand -- dressed in his butler suit. Barbara Rush is decked out, in all seriousness, in a turban -- in 1959! I am anything but an expert on haute couture but turbans belong on Gale Sondergaard in a 1944 Sherlock Holmes movie.) Despite all the dialog about cash and custom, there is no sense of place. The story might have taken place in almost any big city and might have been shot at any time between 1935 and 1950.

    As for the performers, Paul Newman doesn't do a bad job but neither is there any Paul-Newmanness in his acting. He looks at the floor, hits his mark, speaks his piece, and is done. The people who come out of this the best are perhaps Otto Kruger, an old smoothie himself who has been through this sort of thing many times before, and Robert Vaughan in a juicy supporting role. John Williams, in his umpeenth role as a lawyer or investigator of some kind, also comes out ahead.

    There are a couple of scenes, though, that stick in the mind. Alexis Smith, no longer a spring lamb, looks yummy and when she is consumed by horniness and tries to crawl into Paul Newman's bed at night he weasels out of the complicated business in such a way as to leave her breathless with gratitude.

    Newman's explanations to the dotty Billie Burke about how she can easily avoid paying taxes on some stock she owns and some charitable contributions she makes was, I thought, quite instructive. If it left me saddened, and it did, it was only because I am so poor I don't pay any taxes and so those kinds of shenanigans were of no more than intellectual value to me.

    There's a short courtroom scene (only one witness: the snooty butler) that wraps everything up neatly and resolves all problems. It's hardly gripping, although the stakes are high. If you're in the mood for this kind of film, it ought to be satisfying enough, but I wound up with a sense of despair at all the opportunities that were simply thrown away because no one seemed to be paying attention.
An error has occured. Please try again.