My School Chum (1960) User Reviews (3)

MY SCHOOL FRIEND (Robert Siodmak, 1960) **1/2

[Bunuel1976 · 6/10 · 18 September 2007]

I had never heard of this latter-day Siodmak effort prior to its showing up one afternoon on Italian TV. As it turned out, this was quite an interesting and unusual film – being a critique of the Nazi regime from the viewpoint of the Germans themselves. Even more surprising is the fact that the subject matter is treated here as black comedy – dealing with an ageing postal worker (a wonderful Heinz Ruhmann) who, fed up with the war, decides to write to his old school chum Hermann Goering; however, his letter is intercepted by the latter’s underlings and Ruhmann soon finds himself a political prisoner! Eventually, Goering (never actually seen) gets wind of his friend’s situation and orders a medical examination where he’s to be declared insane and thus not qualified for the death sentence – the trouble is that, with the war over, he can’t get his old job back because of this “condition”!!

So begins his 15-year odyssey to contact the people who could attest to his normal mental health – however, they’re either dead, behind bars or unwilling (a Nazi doctor, involved in the sterilization of patients and who was against the diagnosis, suffered the consequences for defying Goering’s instructions). Among the funny/absurdist bits are the fight between Goering’s lackeys for possession of the treasonous letter, Mario Adorf’s appearance as a fellow prisoner of Ruhmann’s (he killed a relative for snoring and, being a law student, is actually cross that it’s his cellmate who’s passed off as crazy rather than himself) and the party after the war during which a masked Ruhmann attempts to elicit a response from an ex-Nazi officer determined to keep a low profile.

Rühmann strikes again

[Horst_In_Translation · 6/10 · 21 June 2016]

"Mein Schulfreund" or "Der Schulfreund" or "My School Chum" is a German black-and-white film from 1960. If you read Heinz Rühmann is the lead actor and also see the title, you may think this is another comedy from him, but this is not really true. I have seen many of his movies and I must say that this 90-minute film from over 55 years ago has more depth than what he usually did, at least in his early career. His later years (he is almost 60 here) offer a memorable dramatic impact and this one here is no exception at all. The director is Robert Siodmak, one of the most impactful German filmmakers of his time and his films usually have politic references included. This one here is no exception. Even 15 years after the end of World War II, it was still all about coming to terms with what went wrong in Germany, so that things could turn out so badly as they actually did. This is a very personal story we have here. It was obvious throughout the entire film that Rühmann had a special connection to the years of Nazi Germany (last but not least due to his Jewish wife) and I felt in many many scenes that he had put all his heart and emotion in here. And it pays off a lot. The result is a dramatically relevant movie that is far from perfect, but carried strongly thanks to Rühmann's mesmerizing lead performance. Everybody who sees him only as a comedy actor needs to watch this as soon as possible and they will see him in a completely different light. On a side-note, the very young Mario Adorf is also in here. I recommend the watch, even more than half a century later. Thumbs up.

ONE OF THE BEST OF WEST GERMAN CINEMA IN THE 50'S

[J. Steed · 9/10 · 10 October 1999]

Based on a true event Robert Siodmak made a very good, tragi-comic (and underrated) satire on how during the 50's West Germany dealt with its Nazi-past. A postman shows civil courage in 1944 but still has to pay for the consequences after WW2. The postman wrote Goering to stop the war after which he was officially declared of unsound mind; it takes him 15 years to get rehabilitation.

This mix of comedy, satire and tragedy could have easily lead to an uneasy film. But Siodmak has a very tight directorial control thereby getting the right balance between the elements; there are some typical Siodmak trade marks too as the emphasis on the staircase.

Siodmak is supported by a very good and intelligent script in which the elements of Germany's Nazi-past, civil courage and cowardice (of most former Nazis) combined with the welfare of the West German Economic Miracle and simple bureaucracy are brought together in perfect unity, not forgetting to give the characters a good psychological foundation. Another good aspect of the script (one of the best Simmel ever was involved in) is that the life of the postman (and he is of course symbol for the "ordinary" people) is frequently interrupted by events he has no influence on, though the Rühmann character does say that his own cowardice made him (and with him all his colleagues) becoming a member of the NSDAP.

On face value funny, but really very sad is the scene in which Rühmann (he wants to talk to an ex-Nazi) has to enter a costumed party wearing a false nose: he must play the fool to fight for his rights, which in the end he indeed has to do. What the makers want to tell is clear: look how crazy our West German society is. That ex-Nazis kept their mouth shut is wonderfully symbolized by the medicinal band around the jaws of Robert Graf.

Another fine moment is the conversation between the jailed nazi-doctor (Hans Leibelt) and Rühmann: not the doctor is shown behind bars - he has fled into inner exile - but the Rühmann character. The film also tells something about the judicial system in West Germany of the 50's. In a first appeal the judge bases his decision on a document signed in 1944 by the nazi-doctor who at the time of the decision is already sentenced to 10 years imprisonment.

Heinz Rühmann is extraordinary as the postman, a part that is reminiscent of the captain in "Der Hauptmann von Köpenick". But where Rühmann as the captain overdid things, in this film he is kept perfectly under control by Siodmak and/or himself, which makes the building up to the final scene very convincing. Other very good parts are those of Hans Leibelt and Ernst Schröder.

There are some inside jokes too. The dialogue of the scene in which the Rühmann character has to proof that he is of unsound mind contains a quote from a poem by Bertold Brecht "Vom armen B.B." of 1921: Von dieser Städten wird bleiben: der durch sie hindurch ging: die Wind! (all that will remain of the cities is what once went through them: the wind). The other is the casting of Alexander Golling as Ortsgruppenleiter Krögelmeister; Golling was known to have been a devoted Nazi. In an interview Siodmak said that he never could find out why Golling accepted the part, but that he was good in it. Golling in his bombastic style of acting surely is.

Fine cinematography with beautiful lightning by Helmut Ashley. I consider this one of the best films by Siodmak and one of the best of the West German cinema of the late 50's and it deserves more than 1 viewing.