User Reviews (73)

Add a Review

  • 1961 in England. Homosexuals were routinely jailed just because they were homosexuals. It was still the love that dare not speak its name.

    Blackmailers had a terrific open season on gays - extorting funds for silence. It is incredible that this movie was made - on two levels. One being the obvious, who would want to star in such a controversial film?

    Enter one Dirk Bogarde, putting both his reputation and his career on the line. He moved deliberately beyond his "Doctor in the House" series of light romantic leading men to make this benchmark film.

    It may seem dated today to some eyes, but it captures an authentic London of 1961 and is filmed on location in the streets for most of it. One can see the barriers, goofophiles, holding the passersby back from the location shooting! "Flower Drum Song" is featured on a marquee in one of the scenes.

    The suspense is carried along beautifully, you are never sure how it is all going to turn out, there are no easy solutions, there are some wonderful sub-plots, unexpected little surprises, like the childhood friend of a victim staunchly loyal against his wife's homophobic wishes.

    The husband and wife story is beautifully depicted and completely non-formulaic. I love the rush and buzz of London surrounding the taut, tense story. Groundbreaking film. 8 out 10.
  • From what I have read, this was the first British film ever to use the word "homosexual" in the dialogue. That may, or may not, be technically true. Regardless, in 1961, overt gay references were risky to filmmakers, at least in Britain and the United States. Thus, the most amazing thing about "Victim" is the simple fact that it was made.

    The film's theme is anything but subtle. Viewers in 1961 learn that government laws punish gays and encourage blackmailers, who function as predators to extort money from those whose instincts are out of sync with societal "norms". The film thus portrays gay men as prey, and tending to be secretive, scared, nervous, and sad. Dirk Bogarde gives an excellent performance as a powerful married barrister, secretly gay, who thinks he himself is on the verge of being blackmailed.

    But while the film thus has obvious educational benefits, it is also quite entertaining, thanks to the plot rationale, which revolves around trying to guess who the blackmailer is. It's a whodunit mystery. Well into the film, a rather strange looking young man appears on a motorcycle and proceeds to chastise a barber for trying to escape from impending blackmail payments. But is this young man the real blackmailer, or just an envoy?

    Adding to the entertaining plot line is the wonderfully off-kilter, noirish lighting from DP Otto Heller. The B&W cinematography conveys an appropriately moody, sometimes sinister, tone, consistent with the film's theme.

    Some films try to be educational but end up preachy. Other films succeed at being educational, but lack entertainment value. "Victim" succeeds both as education and as entertainment, owing to its daring and absorbing screen story, its excellent direction, its good performances, and its effective cinematography.
  • Set in 1950's Britain at a time when homosexuality is against the law, a top Barrister ( Dirk Bogarde) puts his career on the line to tackle the outrageous blackmail of London's homosexuals.

    Impressive cast and outstanding performance by Dirk Bogarde as the troubled barrister whose anguish and pain one can see in his face throughout the film. Watching this now in the 21st century, it seems unbelievable to think that homosexuality was illegal here forty years ago. This is not to say that homophobia is not a concern now, because it still is, however there have been large strides forward for the acceptance and tolerance of homosexuals in mainstream society.

    This film is an excellent historical snippet at a time of contentious laws as well as being a fine piece of art. Basil Dearden directs brilliantly and the script maintains a gripping interest throughout. In addition it was nice to see many parts of London as they were in the fifties before factories were knocked down and the hordes of yuppie apartments where built along the Thames.
  • It would be easy to view this movie as nothing more than a somewhat dated film. However, for it's time, this movie was ground-breaking, for any number of reasons, including its superb acting. Dirk Bogarde and Sylvia Syms, in particular, were perfect in their parts.

    What many don't realize is that this movie is credited with helping to decriminalize homosexuality in Britain. When "Victim" was released, it started a nationwide discussion about homosexuality and associated blackmail. At the time, approximately 90% of all blackmail cases involved homosexuals, and Bogarde's character was a classic example of a blackmail "victim". The point of the movie wasn't that all homosexuals were victims, but they could only be victims so long as the law permitted it. The blackmail wasn't merely because they were homosexual, but due to the harsh prison sentences a homosexual could (and often did) receive. How often does a movie get the opportunity to help create such a profound change in society?
  • claudecat25 November 2003
    Warning: Spoilers
    This drama is well acted and beautifully shot, with gorgeous, dramatic lighting and some interesting camera angles and movement. The story is cleverly written as a thriller, keeping the audience guessing, and building up sympathy for the characters before explaining their "abnormality" (probably a necessary tactic in 1961). Like other British movies of the time period, the film is not action-packed by today's standards, but the suspense is maintained, and I never found my attention wandering. Some of the dialogue is didactic, but is usually well-enough handled that it doesn't destroy the line of the story.

    I didn't agree with another IMDB viewer that the movie portrayed homosexuality purely as "an affliction": my impression was that the writers were trying to show the common view of the time. Certainly most homosexuals in that era would have been affected by the general attitude and internalized the idea that they are abnormal and shameful, and the movie shows this. (Some of the dialogue may be difficult for gay people today to watch, since it is very insulting.) However, I wasn't convinced the authors fully agreed with the straight characters who were sympathetically condescending, partly because of the pains they took to create strong gay characters, and also because of the glimmers the film offers of a better future. [NEXT SENTENCES may contain slight SPOILERS] Listen to the trio of characters Bogarde confronts toward the end of the film: are they all filled with shame? What about the reaction of Bogarde's law assistant? The handling of a particular photo also supports this idea: it is hidden for most of the story, and then turns out to contain a more poetic and sympathetic image than we'd expected.

    Some viewers think "Victim" is no longer socially relevant, but I disagree: not only are many parts of the world still very anti-homosexual, but the idea that homosexuality is a choice is current in America, and this movie is one of the few I've seen that explores what happens when someone tries to force himself to lead a "normal" life. Is that character happy in his "choice"? Are the people in his family better off because he made that decision? The film presents a complex story and lets the viewer decide.

    One thing I did find outdated was the impression the authors give that homosexual men are more sensitive and fragile than straight men. However, this provides an opportunity for several scenes involving tears or held-back tears, which are well-acted. I can understand why some people thought the film had too many secondary characters, but I thought most of them were colorful and interesting, so I wouldn't have wanted to cut them out.

    All in all, an interesting movie for those who like to consider social issues.
  • This is probably the most mature film ever made about the realities of gay life in 1960s Europe (not just Britain). Bogard's unflinching portrayal of a gay lawyer's search for the truth about an attempted blackmail of his ex lover is masterful. Sadly, a lot of the particulars depicted here still hold true-gays in public life are still persecuted and subject to blackmail (since not all are "out" in the current sense of the word). There is none of the hideous sniggering anti gay attitude here that characterize many later films about homosexuals (ie, Cruising, and especially, Staircase-a truly awful film featuring two straight actors, Richard Burton and Rex Harrison, both engaged in a disparate attempt to prove they are 'not gay' I suppose). Beyond the subject matter, actually much too serious for a standard film noir, the film is photographed beautifully in moody early sixties black and white, perfect for a noirish crime drama such as this.
  • Straightforward, non-sensationalized British film, an original from screenwriters Janet Green and John McCormick, has a ring of blackmailers taking advantage of the laws prohibiting homosexuality in England and threatening to 'out' certain parties if they don't pay up; after one victim commits suicide, a former friend--and married lawyer--decides to play detective and expose the blackmailers, at the risk of ruining his own career and marriage. Dirk Bogarde is excellent in the lead; his grimace of both humility and humiliation is rather touching, and very human. The victims are the usual lot (an actor, a hairdresser, etc.), but the film is exceptionally engrossing and well-made, neatly camouflaging its plea for tolerance under the guise of a suspense drama (and the denouement is nicely staged). Director Basil Dearden includes a few intentionally sardonic visuals, and he isn't afraid to knock down walls (though any male-to-male intimacy stays off-screen). Still, a watermark for gay cinema. *** from ****
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Fortunately, it's unusual for any law to be responsible for creating more crime than it actually deters, but the legislation that criminalised homosexual acts between men came to be seen as the "blackmailer's charter" and caused an incredible amount of human misery before decriminalisation in 1967 eventually removed the intimidation and fear that so many British gay men had previously endured. Basil Dearden's remarkable movie "Victim", provides a priceless snapshot of how the lives of many gay men living in London were affected by this now discredited piece of legislation and in so doing, points to the need for more tolerance to be used in order to achieve a greater measure of justice for everyone.

    Although by 1961, public and police attitudes to homosexuality in Britain were becoming more relaxed, taking this kind of stand and addressing the issue so overtly in a mainstream movie was still extremely controversial and risky. "Victim" is widely credited as being the first movie in which the word "homosexual" was used and also includes words such as "invert" and "queer" which are no longer in common use.

    Melville Farr (Dirk Bogarde) is a highly successful London barrister who repeatedly refuses to take telephone calls from a young man called Boy Barrett (Peter McEnery). Unknown to Farr, Barrett is desperately attempting to leave the country because he's being pursued by the police. Being broke and having failed in his attempts to get help from his friends, he's soon arrested and charged for stealing a large amount of money from his employers. When police checks establish that he has no expensive possessions and lives very modestly, Detective Inspector Harris (John Barrie) quickly recognises that this young man is obviously being blackmailed.

    Barrett refuses to say what he did with the stolen money or to provide the police with any information about the scrapbook clippings about Farr that was found in his possession at the time of his arrest. Harris then interviews Farr but he's unable to offer any meaningful assistance. The barrister then looks visibly shaken when Harris informs him that Barrett has committed suicide by hanging himself in his cell.

    Farr is happily married but has also had a couple of unconsummated gay relationships. One was with a fellow student at university and the second was with Barrett. His wife Laura (Sylvia Syms) knew all about his homosexuality before she married him but only learns about Barrett after his death. Feeling terribly guilty and upset about what happened to his friend, Farr bravely decides to track down the blackmailers even though doing so means risking his reputation, his marriage and his career. His investigation soon reveals that the blackmailers' victims include a wide range of men from different social classes and occupational groups.

    Dirk Bogarde was an enormously popular film star who was ambitious to advance from his "matinee idol" status to be regarded as a serious actor. He certainly achieved this by taking the role of Farr and his performance in this movie led to him being offered the more challenging types of roles that he became known for in the second stage of his career. His courage in risking his entire career in order to pursue his professional ambition was impressive but due to the prevailing attitudes, it still wasn't really possible for him to declare his own sexual orientation at that time.

    Melville Farr is one of the most honest characters imaginable as he's remarkably straightforward with everyone he encounters. Bogarde is perfect in his role and Sylvia Syms brings great dignity and intelligence to her portrayal of his wife who stays incredibly strong and loyal despite the emotional pain that she suffers.

    "Victim" is clearly a movie with a point to make and achieves what it set out to do very effectively. Commendably, however, nothing is sacrificed in terms of entertainment in order to get the message across as it's also an engrossing thriller which eventually leads to a surprise revelation near the end.
  • lucy-1930 January 2007
    Warning: Spoilers
    It's not just Dirk Bogarde's central performance but the noir photography, the location shooting, the suspense plot and the ensemble cast that make this a great film. I love films where a group of disparate characters band together to run down a criminal or right a wrong. Here barrister Farr gets together with a Cockney ticket clerk to track down the blackmailers who drove his "friend" boy Barrett to suicide. One by one others turn out to be connected, and the web runs from an elderly barber to an aging matinée idol to a sleek car salesman to the head of a photographic agency (his mews flat is just a little too tasteful). All are victims of the blackmailers. Hanging around the periphery are another camp couple ("I wish we could go home to Cheltenham, PH.") who turn out to be running another scam altogether. Bogarde wanted to escape his own matinée idol box and deliberately flouted filmic rules he felt were stifling him. He insisted on keeping in takes where he cleared his throat mid-sppech, and talking with his back to the camera - naturalistic tropes that now seem clichés, but were unusual for the time. It does mean, though, that characters spend a lot of time unburdening their hearts while leaning on mantelpieces.
  • harry-7628 March 1999
    When first released in 1961 "Victim" was considered a bold comment on a then hushed-up subject. Looking at the film today, the work is still a forceful, frank account of British societal mores, firmly backed up by laws. While attitudes and behaviors have changed regarding alternative lifestyles, this drama powerfully documents conditions as they existed for many years in England. Sir Dirk Bogarde, one of Britain's most distinguished actors, adorns this presentation with his unique charismatic presence and skill. Ably supported by a strong cast, Bogarde subtly delineates a respected lawyer risking both his professional standing and his marriage by confronting hard-line blackmailers. A taut screenplay and tight direction enhance this thriller.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Homosexual acts between consenting adults were first legalised in England and Wales by the Sexual Offences Act 1967. This Act is sometimes today wrongly regarded, largely by those who find it difficult to credit just how much social attitudes have changed in the last four or five decades, as a piece of legislative tidiness, the long-overdue repeal of long-obsolete and rarely enforced laws. In fact, in the fifties and early sixties the laws forbidding homosexuality were frequently enforced in Britain, and numerous gay men were sent to prison for breaching them. In 1957 the Wolfenden Committee, set up to review the law on sexual offences, recommended the repeal of the anti-homosexuality laws, but the Government proceeded to ignore that recommendation for the next ten years.

    "Victim", dating from 1961 is sometimes regarded as the film which helped to influence public opinion in favour of reform. It was quite deliberately made as a plea for a change in the law, and concentrates on something which perhaps frightened homosexuals even more than the threat of a police prosecution- the threat of blackmail. The main character is Melville Farr, a highly successful barrister. At the age of forty, Farr is about to become a Queen's Counsel and there is talk of his being appointed a judge. He is apparently happily married to his wife, Laura. Farr, however, has a hidden secret; he is bisexual, and has had an emotional but non-sexual relationship with a young man named Jack Barrett. Barrett has fallen victim to a gang of blackmailers who specialise in preying on homosexuals and who know of his relationship with Farr. Barrett is eventually driven to suicide, and when he discovers the truth of what happened to his friend, Farr decides to expose the blackmail ring, although he knows that the publicity of a court case could jeopardise not only his career but also his marriage.

    Dirk Bogarde, the star of this film, can be seen as a British Rock Hudson. Like Hudson he was handsome, highly popular with women, and secretly gay. As in Hudson's case rumours circulated about his sexuality, and the studio found it necessary to provide him with attractive female escorts in order to counter those rumours, although unlike Hudson he was never forced into a phony marriage. The role of Farr, therefore, must have had a deep personal significance for him, and he gives a particularly good performance here. Farr is not simply portrayed as a crusader in a noble cause; he is also driven by a sense of guilt arising out of Barrett's death. The younger man had approached Farr for help, only to be rebuffed because Farr wrongly suspected Barrett himself of being a blackmailer.

    Bogarde receives good support from Sylvia Syms as Laura, who is a complex character. She is neither the typical loyal, supportive wife beloved of film-makers around this period, nor the typical wronged, innocent party. Her relationship with her husband is an unusual one; Laura knew at the time of her marriage that Farr was bisexual and that he had previously had relationships with men. She did not, however, know about his friendship with Barrett, and when the truth came out saw this as a betrayal. the film leaves open the question of whether their relationship can survive this revelation.

    This film was a highly controversial one when it first came out; this was the first British film to deal openly with the subject of homosexuality, and the first English language film actually to use the word "homosexual". It was for a time banned in America, even though the American censors had not banned "The Children's Hour" which came out in the same year and which deals with the subject of lesbianism. Perhaps the difference was that "Victim" is a film which seeks sympathy and understanding for homosexuals, whereas "The Children's Hour", although it was daring in tackling a subject which had previously been taboo, nevertheless tended to approach that subject on the basis of the assumption (a common one in 1961) that same-sex love was both unnatural and immoral.

    Like a number of films which were ground-breaking in its day, "Victim" can seem dated today. From the vantage-point of 2009 it probably seems to anyone unaware of the historical background like just another routine sixties crime thriller. When we see it in the light of that background, however, we realise just what a brave film this was. 7/10
  • During his lifetime Dirk Bogarde never admitted to being gay and before his death he destroyed many of his private papers. Nevertheless, his sexuality has long been an open secret and Bogarde's desire to keep his private life private had to be respected. It was, therefore, an astonishingly brave decision to take on the role of Melville Farr, the closeted gay barrister who is willing to 'come out' in order to break a blackmailing ring in Basil Dearden's pioneering thriller "Victim".

    Bogarde says he chose the part because he wanted to break free of the matinée idol roles he had played up to that time but by doing so he risked alienating his fan-base. Of course, by playing Farr and subsequent roles in films like "The Servant" and "Death in Venice" it could be argued that he was vicariously acting out on screen what he was feeling in real life.

    That "Victim" was made at all is as astonishing as Bogarde's decision to take the lead. This was 1961 and homosexuality was still illegal in Britain. "Victim" broke new ground by making it the central theme and by making the gay characters sympathetic, the victims of the title, and by making the law, (at least in the form of John Barrie's investigating copper), sympathetic to their plight. This was a crusading work and is today largely credited with bring about the change in the law that decriminalized homosexual acts between consenting adults in Great Britain.

    Viewed today it is, of course, both melodramatic and didactic. At times it seems the characters aren't saying lines but making speeches. As a thriller it's reasonably exciting, (it's got sufficient red-herrings to keep us guessing), and Dearden admitted that without the thriller element the film might never have been made. (He did something similar with racism in the film "Sapphire").

    "Victim" also featured a number of other gay actors in the cast, notably Dennis Price, superb as an ageing actor, and the actor/director Hilton Edwards. Whatever his motives for taking on the role, Bogarde is superb and he has at least one great scene when he finally admits his true nature to his wife, beautifully played by Sylvia Syms. There is certainly no doubt the film has dated and yet it remains one of the greatest of all gay movies.
  • Looking at this film from today's perspective it looks very tame, the story is a group of gay men from different social economic groups being blackmailed, but this film was made in 1961 6 years before the 1967 Sexual Offences Act which decriminalised sex acts between men over the age of 21 in private, the film was made during the period which became known as the British new wave when British films wanted to become more realistic and challenge the accepted view of society and the establishment but this was still a brave move at the time, the film treats the men sympathetically (who at the time would've been regarded as perverts and criminals) and argues (as much as it dares) for the law to be changed, Dirk Bogarde plays a successful barrister who decides to take on the blackmailers and let the chips fall where they may, knowing that that decision will destroy pretty much every aspect of his life, the film is well acted and very well made, i think because of its time and subject matter the film will always be very interesting as a period piece more so as time goes by, to think that less than 50 years ago there were laws like this and people were persecuted and prosecuted for their preferences is a disgrace and i think that's what most of todays audiences will think.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I know I'm alone (or maybe there's people who are too afraid to say what they really think about a film disagreeing with the invisible but at times appealing "common sense") but "Victim" is not that good, it is very dated and for an admirer of LGBT themed films this is very low even for an important subject matter that was treated as something so dark and twisted, with no chance of goodness.

    Might have been groundbreaking at the time of its release for using the word 'homosexual' for the first time on the screen and for changing British laws concerning homosexuality but now it is so depressing and awful that it has a worrying ability to show how England had unfair and misguided laws against homosexuals. In Basil Dearden's film, Dirk Bogarde is a respected lawyer that investigates a blackmailer who threatens several gay men (they are closeted persons since during the time it was a crime being a homosexual), and one of the victims was a young boy, affair of the lawyer, who killed himself after being arrested. Now he might have to risk his career, reputation and family to arrest this person.

    My objection to this story is the way the script dealt with it, very confusing in its character presentation, crossing everyone in a obtuse and complex way that was difficult to handle or accept it. When the storm of characters stop, comes the film noir style for a dramatic story that could be more emotional, less painful to watch and a little bit positive instead of a negative view of gays, negative view on all the British (yes, since if the characters are not gay they are homophobes, repressive, combative and blackmailers who take advantage of a ridiculous law).

    I don't know what was more concerning, the portrayal of the gays, played all as emotionless figures who simply have needs but don't know how to love (someone makes this remark in the film); the homophobe bar owner who happens to attend gays; or the people who blackmail making of these a pathetic and awful lifestyle.

    I haven't found the performances good or bad (but the cute boy, reason of all Bogarde's crusade, was interesting and had the best moments in the film, sad, he appears briefly), but the story wasn't as brilliant and educative than a similar film named "Anders als die Andern" ("Different from the Others")(1919), a German film that introduced the first gay character in film history, a movie elucidative and so ahead of its time in bringing to public the difficult of the homosexual condition treating as a case of normal behavior rather than something to be punished with imprisonment. But at least in "Victim" Dirk Bogarde risked his career just as much Conrad Veidt did in the 1919 film and that's something to be applauded.

    It made me angry because I expected more from a so well talked film, and it made me sad after so much pessimistic things presented in both sides of the matter. It might work for those who wants to comprehend the incomprehensible British laws against homosexuals that existed for a long time; you're gonna see a historical look on the subject but that's it. 3/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I though it was important to remind myself that Victim was made in 1961, when homosexuality was still a crime in many civilized countries. That's partly why I think Victim belongs in a class of its own. Basil Dearden, the director of The Blue Lamp is a personal favorite of mine and Dirk Bogarde, well Dirk Bogarde is an actor who also belongs in a class of his own. Courageous is the first word who comes to mind. He was a hugely popular actor in 1959's England. Beautiful to look at on top of that. A matinée idol who was also gay in real life. Imagine the courage it took to play a secret gay in this movie and he doesn't shy away from giving a face, his face to the truth of his tortured character. - Kudos also to Sylvia Syms who plays his wife. Sylvia Syms who also played the Queen Mother to Helen Mirren's The Queen in 2006 is a real standout and her reaction to her husband's revelation is worthy of study. Superb. Dirk Bogarde with a successful career behind him, started, with this film a new and spectacular career, starring in films directed by Luchino Visconti, Joseph Losey, Reiner Werner Fassbinder, Alain Resnais and others.
  • Five years before Parliament repealed the sodomy laws in Great Britain, unfortunately too late for the colonies they had already let go in the third world who still have vigorously enforced sodomy laws on the books, Basil Dearden directed this ground breaking film Victim about a group of gay men being blackmailed.

    The ring starts to unravel when young Peter McEnery is caught embezzling funds from his construction firm. But this embezzler is hardly living it up considering the money he's taken. When the police investigate and try to get the truth out of him, McEnery hangs himself in his cell.

    What else back then could he have done he thought? He was guilty of breaking the law for an act of love that could have gotten him jail time. One of the people McEnery thinks of when he looks for money to quickly leave the United Kingdom was barrister Dirk Bogarde. But Bogarde refuses to see him.

    Bogarde was like so many gay men who even today still live in the closet because of pressure in the areas they do live and in the professions they are in. But back then being open could close a lot of career doors to one. But his back is up and he's figuring whoever is blackmailing McEnery will be knocking on his door shortly.

    Of course the hard part is telling wife Sylvia Sims of his predicament. He's married to her because convention expects it. He was in fact more open with her about his life than either Heath Ledger or Jake Gyllenhaal was in Brokeback Mountain, but he said to her he'd left all that behind when he took the marriage vows. I'm sure he tried also in his own way.

    And he's feeling guilty a bit about McEnery's death. It sends him on a quest to flush these bottom feeding slime balls out from under the rocks they were hiding under.

    Bogarde of course was a closeted gay man himself and never quite came out in his life. He was in a committed relationship for over 40 years and was at the time of Victim. Another closeted gay man was Dennis Price who has a small role as an actor and another of the blackmailer's victims. These two guys were taking daring steps for 1961.

    What I liked best about this film was the portrayal of the young blackmailer Derren Nesbitt. He hangs around the gay haunts of 1961 London at the time with his latest camera equipment just taking all kinds of candid shots for future use. There's a scene in his room where he's talking real tough on the phone to one of his victims. He gets up off his bed to leave the room and the camera takes in a picture on the wall of an anatomically correct Greek statue. This poor wretch of a human being was fighting his own feelings because of what society told him was wrong. Internalized homophobia can twist a soul like nothing else. That Basil Dearden was farsighted enough to pick up on that in people and use it in the film is commendable.

    Bogarde knows his career will be in the toilet but does it anyway. I'd like to think when those laws were repealed which they would be later in the Sixties, he could pick the pieces up. Many never could.

    Which brings to mind one of my claimants from my former job at New York State Crime Victims Board. A dear little man named Ernie who is probably not with us any longer. He was living in an SRO in New York City and was assaulted by a trick he picked up in the mid Eighties, Ernie was in his early sixties.

    When I got to know him, I found out that he had a degree in political science and had graduated before World War II from the Columbia University School of Far East Studies. He had hopes to enter the Foreign Service, but the McCarthy era discouraged that. Back then he was a 'security risk' because of his sexual orientation. So robbed of the career he could have had by homophobia he slid gradually down the societal scale until I met him. He made a living doing secretarial temp work when he wasn't abusing a lot of substance.

    As surely as Dirk Bogarde's career went, so did Ernie's in real life. And this review is dedicated to Ernie and all the others like him who could not realize their full potential because of some archaic mores.
  • Henri-George Clouzot's "le corbeau" (the raven,1943) always comes to mind when it comes to slanderous mail.The principal differences between the French movie and Dearden's one is that in the former,the raven was not a blackmailer,he was not in it for the money ,but out of pure wickedness,and he would "punish" not the gay-it was too soon- but the adulterer,the abortion and other little sins.

    Dearden's work is a bold move for the time.The movies dealing with homosexuality were very rare then.It was one of the first to fight against intolerance. Of course this topic was in Tennessee Williams' plays ,but it was not really militant .We can mention in the sixties the almost contemporary "children's hour" (Wyler,1963) "the fox "(Mark Rydell,1967) and "the staircase" (Donen,1969).

    Dearden's work suffers from a certain inflation of secondary characters which weakens the drama.(Dennis Price's part does not seem much relevant.)Consequently,the best moments are to be found in the first twenty minutes:Peter MC Ennery (who would be Rasputin's assassin in "j'ai tué Raspoutine"(1967) ,and coincidence,this Yusupov was also a gay)'s escape ,recalling sometimes James Mason's in "odd man out" ,is breathtaking:alone in a world gone hostile and threatening,his phone calls remain unanswered,and everybody turns his back on him:his buddy's girlfriend's attitude is telling ,full of contempt and repulsion.The scenes between Dirk Bogarde -I do not need to add to the praise he has already received- and his wife are also great moments of true emotion.Had Dearden focused on the husband/wife/young man,his film would have gained in strength.Nevertheless,this courageous plea is still worth watching.
  • I consider this film to be the zenith of Dirk Bogarde's career. He was a fine British actor, who had been sexually repressed by archaic British rules, laws and customs about homosexuality in the fifties and sixties. His acting ability was Oscar-level in several of his films. This is the best of the lot. Despite all of these obstacles, Borgarde overcame these prejudices, and managed to have a very fine screen career. This story of a prominent British judicial member being blackmailed was symptomatic of countless similar cases both public and private in Britain during this time period. What a pity Borgarde did not live in a more enlightened time period. His talents will be sorely missed.
  • Theo Robertson26 September 2005
    Warning: Spoilers
    In 1950 Basil Dearden cast Dirk Bogarde in a groundbreaking film called THE BLUE LAMP , groundbreaking because it was the first film to use the word " bastard " . Eleven years later Dearden cast Bogarde in an even more groundbreaking film called VICTIM which was the first film to use the word " homosexual " . Not only does it use the word but the whole plot revolves around homosexual characters ! This must have shocked the world at the time

    !!!! MILD SPOILERS !!!!

    Looking upon it today it may not be so shocking but it certainly remains one of the most intelligent British movies from that period . Unlike a lot of screenwriters today Janet Green and John McCormick leave the audience to make up their own minds as to the rights and wrongs of whether homosexuality should remain illegal or not . There are a couple of very good points the screenplay makes

    1 ) Being gay is only a crime if it can be proved that you were committing homosexual acts . The victims are more guilty of living a lie than committing a crime . Their indiscretion rather than their sexuality is what got them into trouble

    2 ) The police aren't portrayed as being pro actively hunting down homosexuals like a bunch of Nazis . It's interesting to note that in an era like today where liberal values dominate the British police force have never been held in greater contempt by the public . If they're not hunting down people committing homosexual acts ( or smoking weed ) how come they're too busy to catch burglars ?

    As I said this is an amazingly intelligent script that lets the audience think for its self . One running subplot is two characters being constantly followed by a character who ( Bitterly ironic with hindsight ) looks like Jeremy Thorpe . All through the narrative I was certain that these two men were victims of blackmail while their stalker was the blackmailer . Get ready for a shock when it's revealed how these three men fit into the story

    The cast are very good , more so when you consider that most of the original choices turned the roles because of the movie's subject matter , but Dirk Bogarde is nothing less than superb and probably gives a career best performance as gay barrister Melville Farr though he does come across as perhaps a little too self righteous to be truly effective and perhaps if he came out to both his wife and firm earlier he could have saved himself a lot of grief . As I stated being gay wasn't the crime , you were only prosecuted for being indiscreet . But all in all very good film on a controversial topic ( Much more so in those days ) that never once becomes patronising or polemical
  • VICTIM is an atmospheric and highly suspenseful British crime film that's gone down in history for being the first film to explicitly tackle the subject of homosexuality. Even the word 'homosexual' hadn't been uttered in the cinema until this time. Of course, the theme of sexuality is only part of an otherwise traditional crime story, but it's the bit everyone remembers.

    The affable Dirk Bogarde expertly channels his own inner darkness for his central role as a lawyer investigating a blackmailing plot which has driven a man to suicide. Derren Nesbitt (BURKE & HARE) is suitably nasty as the guy who makes his living from exposing homosexuality - which, of course, carried a jail sentence in those days.

    VICTIM is blessed with strong direction from the veteran Basil Dearden who makes a compelling thriller with some starkly lit black and white photography. The supporting cast, which incorporates Sylvia Sims, Dennis Price, and Charles Lloyd Pack, is exemplary. Okay, this isn't the most entertaining film out there - aside from the extraordinary subject matter the story is relatively familiar - but it has gone down in history as a document of its time.
  • bandw11 February 2008
    This is the story of Melville Farr, a high-ranking English barrister who has just been offered an appointment to be a Queen's Counselor. But Farr is gay, and in investigating who has been blackmailing a friend he is exposed to being blackmailed himself. How Farr deals with this and the impact it has on his career and marriage makes for a quality drama.

    I was thinking that in order to appreciate this film you had to put yourself back in the time when homosexuality was against the law in England, since we have now come such a long way from that time to where some elected officials are now openly gay. On the other hand, the basic theme of this movie still plays. A closeted high-ranking lawyer with a reputation as an upstanding family man could still be open to blackmail. People are still "accused" or "suspicioned" of being gay and often feel the need to defend themselves against such charges, as if there were something inherently wrong with it. Acceptance of differences comes slowly.

    The performances are good, particularly Bogard and Syms. Lovers of skillfully filmed high contrast black and white will appreciate this - it's an art form that has pretty much disappeared. The first half hour, before you really know what's going on, is particularly engrossing. It plays in the style of a film noir thriller.

    The one thing I found a bit bothersome was the apparent need for the characters to vocalize their plight, with statements like "Don't they understand that we are just like anyone else," and "Why are we singled out," and so forth. The plot makes these points well enough, what with a suicide, a heart attack, ruined careers, and multiple blackmails.

    However, it probably took a fair amount of courage at the time just to make this film, which was clearly a plea for legal reform. Reform that came six years later in 1967.
  • Dirk Bogarde,who was a matinee idol at the time,took a brave career risk by playing the married barrister who is being blackmailed over a homosexual affair. Although the film now looks rather dated the two central performances by Bogarde and Sylvia Syms as his wife are still powerful and moving.
  • "Victim" is probably the first mainstream film on either side of the Atlantic to feature a gay hero. Granted, Dirk Bogarde plays a married closet case who hasn't actually engaged in a homosexual act in many years. Nonetheless, it's fairly amazing that, given what we know about attitudes toward gay people in the 1950's that a film this affirming of gay rights could have been made in 1961. It's a movie that's much more about "gay" as an identity than it is about sexuality; it centers on a blackmail ring that includes our closeted hero, a star of the London theatre, a lonely old barber, a Rolls-Royce salesman, and others. As a group, the gay men are intermittently desperate, proud, accepting, self-loathing, and scared -- which said more to me about 1961 than it said about gay men. The title is interesting to me; it seems that the journey of Bogarde's character seems to be the road out of victimization and toward (if this isn't too corny) self-actualization. It's a mildly entertaining movie, but a fascinating historical artifact.
  • For its time, a brave, challenging early 60's British film which takes on the taboo subject of homosexuality (even more in society as a whole than just in movies - homosexuality was illegal, punishable by imprisonment until 1967).

    The film tries hard, within the understandable constraints of its own time, to posit as many views as possible including the abhorrent anti-gay lobby and if ultimately, the conclusion fudges the issue, it's still a thought-provoking movie.

    The plot is initially almost run-of-the-mill thriller, with an early urgency conveyed in the opening scenes where Peter McEnery's "Boy" character goes on the run from the pursuing police, but gradually as we learn about the underlying themes at play, the film then moves on to its major examination of contrasting characters.

    Peopled by a top-class cast, including Dirk Bogarde, Sylvia Sims and Denis Price and directed firmly and stylishly in the "kitchen-sink" monochromatic style of Early 60's British cinema, it's never less than watchable and often involving and indeed gripping.

    Perhaps there are too many characters on either side of the fence, perhaps the simplistic, almost Agatha Christie type blackmail plot doesn't properly serve its subject and I'm still trying to work out the significance of the voyeur-cum-extortionist pair who gather in the same pub as the gay set. The ending, naturally, has compromise written all over it (Bogarde will suppress his homosexuality for a platonic marriage to his forgiving wife), but the very fact that the film shows that not all gay people of the time were prepared to accept their alienation from society, even if it meant exposing themselves to career - damaging publicity is laudable.

    One hopes that a major movie like this played a small part in the abolition of a draconian and outdated law - it's hard to imagine it failing to do so and even though I can watch it today from the vantage point of a far more liberal society than 1961, one would think this would have been an even more explosive and controversial film in its own time.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Dirk Bogarde must be given a lot of credit for starring in a movie deemed quite controversial for its times.

    He plays a successful man about to become a judge and yet he is hiding a terrible secret. That is, he was friends with a young man being blackmailed who ultimately killed himself in jail. Seems that the young man was forced to steal money as the blackmailers knew of his homosexual relationship. It doesn't take long to guess that Bogarde was part of this relationship.

    Trouble with this film is that the 1:43 minutes that it takes to tell the story could have been done in 20 minutes.

    The big surprise here is the discovery who was part of the blackmailing conspiracy. When it comes out, our maiden reveals the nature of anti-homosexual hatred in society. Of course, the financial benefits for her were secondary. Right?

    The story could have been stretched to further detail the relationship's effect on his marriage. His wife seems willing to continue, but that was probably a story in itself.

    When you think of this situation, it's a very sad commentary on the bigoted view of society on this topic. It shows how such a relationship could destroy a career.
An error has occured. Please try again.