Lolita (1962)

Not Rated   |    |  Crime, Drama, Romance


Lolita (1962) Poster

A middle-aged college professor becomes infatuated with a fourteen-year-old nymphet.


7.6/10
89,117

Videos


Photos

  • James Mason and Sue Lyon in Lolita (1962)
  • James Mason and Sue Lyon in Lolita (1962)
  • "Lolita" Premiere Sue Lyon 1962 MGM / **I.V.
  • James Mason and Sue Lyon in Lolita (1962)
  • Sue Lyon in Lolita (1962)
  • Sue Lyon in Lolita (1962)

See all photos

Get More From IMDb

For an enhanced browsing experience, get the IMDb app on your smartphone or tablet.

Get the IMDb app

Reviews & Commentary

Add a Review


User Reviews


16 March 2005 | camcmahon
7
| 'Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins.'
Having just read Vladmir Nabokov's 'Lolita' for Uni, I instantly wanted to see Stanley Kubrick's rendering of the story. Overall I was impressed by what he had done, but I felt some parts of the film didn't quite work. Firstly, although i think Sellers is a great actor and I love him in everything I've seen him in I just couldn't get comfortable with his role here. When reading the book I had a totally different vision of Quilty, so I found it hard to readjust to Seller's performance. Although his acting is great and hilarious as always, it just didn't fit into the plot for me.

I thought James Mason was good, and he played the gradual disintegration of Humbert Humbert with an intensity which i enjoyed. However, i felt that the film did not reveal as much of his character as the novel portrays. The name Humbert Humbert suggests two sides to his nature, and I felt that too much emphasis was placed on his suave and intelligent side, and not enough time was devoted to his burning desire and passion for Lolita. I particularly missed one of my favourite lines that was not used in film, 'Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul.' Although i haven't seen the film in a long time, I think Jeremy Irons from the 1997 version is a much better actor for the role.

Sue Lyon made a great Lolita, although she did tremble on the line between looking young enough for the role and looking too old for it. Still, there were times in the film where she looked so young the odious nature of Humbert's act really struck me. Speaking of this, I felt the film skipped past too much of what really went on between Humbert and Lolita. Although Nabokov similarly leaves this to the reader's imagination, I thought a little more could have been done to stress the nature of Humbert and Lolita's relationship.

Shelley Winters was brilliant, and her acting added so much to the character of Charlotte Haze. I thought she was wonderful; she really fleshed the character out.

Overall, I did enjoy watching this film despite the small niggles I had with it, but I view it as something separate to the novel. In this way it's a more enjoyable experience. I'm looking forward to seeing the 1997 version of the film again (I saw it once years ago!), as I think it is a movie that will benefit much more having been made in a time of a more permissive society, allowing more creative freedom in what can be shown.

Metacritic Reviews


Critic Reviews



More Like This

Barry Lyndon

Barry Lyndon

The Killing

The Killing

Spartacus

Spartacus

Eyes Wide Shut

Eyes Wide Shut

Killer's Kiss

Killer's Kiss

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

Paths of Glory

Paths of Glory

Lolita

Lolita

Fear and Desire

Fear and Desire

2001: A Space Odyssey

2001: A Space Odyssey

Full Metal Jacket

Full Metal Jacket

A Clockwork Orange

A Clockwork Orange

Storyline

Plot Summary


Synopsis (WARNING: Spoilers)


Genres

Crime | Drama | Romance

Everything That's New on Prime Video in May

Freshen up your watchlist with Prime Video’s latest roster of streaming movies and TV shows, featuring some great throwbacks and top-notch newcomers.

See the full list

Around The Web

 | 

Powered by ZergNet

More To Explore

Search on Amazon.com