A middle-aged college professor becomes infatuated with a fourteen-year-old girl.A middle-aged college professor becomes infatuated with a fourteen-year-old girl.A middle-aged college professor becomes infatuated with a fourteen-year-old girl.
- Nominated for 1 Oscar
- 2 wins & 10 nominations total
Terry Kilburn
- Man
- (as Terence Kilburn)
- Director
- Writers
- Vladimir Nabokov(screenplay) (novel "Lolita")
- Stanley Kubrick(uncredited)
- James B. Harris(uncredited)
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaPeter Sellers modeled the voice of his character Clare Quilty on that of his director, Stanley Kubrick.
- GoofsDirector Stanley Kubrick walks out of the very first interior shot (center to right bottom) of Humbert entering Quilty's house.
- Quotes
Charlotte Haze: Do you believe in God?
Humbert Humbert: The question is does God believe in me?
- Crazy creditsThe credits are played over footage of Lolita's toenails being painted.
- Alternate versionsThe scene where Lolita first "seduces" Humbert as he lies in the cot is a good 10 seconds longer in the British cut of the film. In the U.S. cut, the shot fades as she whispers the details of the "game" she played with Charlie at camp. In the U.K. print, the shot continues as Humbert mumbles that he's not familiar with the game. She then bends down again to whisper more details. Kubrick then cuts to a closer shot of Lolita's head as she says "Well, allrighty then" and then fades as she begins to descend to Humbert on the cot. The British cut of the film was used for the Region 1 DVD release.
- ConnectionsEdited into Hai-Kubrick (1999)
Featured review
brilliant visual translation of the novel
It was very hard to get a hold of lolita. I couldn't rent it anywhere, 'till one day i stepped in the library and i went to their video section. And yes, they had it, Lolita. I was very happy to have found it, cause i had already read the novel by Vladimir Nabokov, which made a big impression on me, though sometimes i had to force myself to reading it. When i saw the movie, it was everything i hoped it would be when i read the novel. The images and environment that Kubrick put on film were exactly the same as the visual world that I created in my mind while I was reading the book. The actors were perfectly cast and the whole atmosphere, ambiance and tension, that Kubrick created in his film, felt exactly like they felt in the book.
The screenplay could not have been written better by the master himself. When someone has read the book they'll know what i mean when i say that it seems almost impossible to make a film of it. The book is so complex, psychological and plays at so many different levels, that on screen, people wouldn't be able to make sense out of it. But the screenplay that Nabokov wrote was a lot more accesible and could therefore reach a bigger audience.
The controversial novel was talked about a lot in its time and i think Stanley Kubrick, always controversial and provocative, was the perfect director to make a film out of it. And he did. The theme of sexual obsession is handled very subtle, but it IS being handled, and that gives the film the tension and controverse that we find in all of Kubrick's films.
The film made a big impression on me, as the book did, but even more, they made the same impression on me, which satisfied me a great deal.
Great film of a great book.
The screenplay could not have been written better by the master himself. When someone has read the book they'll know what i mean when i say that it seems almost impossible to make a film of it. The book is so complex, psychological and plays at so many different levels, that on screen, people wouldn't be able to make sense out of it. But the screenplay that Nabokov wrote was a lot more accesible and could therefore reach a bigger audience.
The controversial novel was talked about a lot in its time and i think Stanley Kubrick, always controversial and provocative, was the perfect director to make a film out of it. And he did. The theme of sexual obsession is handled very subtle, but it IS being handled, and that gives the film the tension and controverse that we find in all of Kubrick's films.
The film made a big impression on me, as the book did, but even more, they made the same impression on me, which satisfied me a great deal.
Great film of a great book.
helpful•71
- krullie
- Nov 1, 2001
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $2,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $4,631
- Runtime2 hours 33 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.66 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
