In the tension-filled post-Civil War years, a former Confederate General-turned-Texas rancher is desperate for the Army and the railroad to lay their tracks south to help his economically-bedraggled state, aided and abetted in his mission by old friend 'Wild Bill' Hickok, a sympathetic 'Buffalo Bill' Cody, and a whip-wiedling, flame-haired Calamity Jane. Universal western mixes outdoor locations and backlot scenes with stock shots and a multitude of close-ups (which often don't match the long-shots), not unlike the popular television westerns of the era. Too-modern overall, with laughable scenes such as when Cody advises Jane to wear some makeup once in a while to attract men (she's already sporting more makeup--including lipstick and false eyelashes--than most saloon girls). Brian Keith has to play the lead as both goodhearted family man and guerrilla fighter on horseback, which is an intriguing combination that the filmmakers just fritter away. *1/2 from ****
Add a Review
-
moonspinner555 February 2011
-
I recently saw this film for the first time on TV. It starts out OK but later turns into a joke.
The first part of the movie deals with the Brian Keith character's fight to help Texas recover following the Civil War. This includes battling with the carpet baggers and organizing the ranchers to move their cattle to the nearest railhead, which happens to be in Kansas. The drive fails so Keith decides to go to Kansas to persuade the railroad to run a line into Texas.
Fine up to this point, but then the picture turns ludicrous. Along comes Wild Bill Hickok (a woefully miscast Robert Culp), Young Buffalo Bill (Jim McMullen) and Calamity Jane (Judi Meredith). Why these characters were introduced into the story is beyond me. They add nothing and serve as not much more than comic relief. The Plainsman (1936) explored this concept much better.
The conflict between Keith and the army (led by an effective Albert Ryder), could have been developed without the aforementioned three characters. Good character actors like Warner Anderson, Harry Carey Jr., Richard Deacon and Trevor Bardette are wasted. Possibly some of their scenes were cut as the film only runs 75 minutes.
They should have built the story around the opening scenes. That would have resulted in a much better movie. -
boblipton30 July 2019Ex-Confederate Texan Brian Keith and some fellow ranchers, fed up with the low prices offered by carpetbaggers, drive their cattle up north to sell to the Army. They encounter a sympathetic Buffalo Bill Cody (Robert Culp) and Calamity Jane (Judi Meredith) and obstacles.
It's a theatrical movie, but it's lit and has a score like a TV western: bright colors like a 1960s Louis Lamour paperback, and intrusive music that tells you precisely how you're supposed to feel at any moment. The script by Gene L. Coon is sympathetic to the Texans; Coon is, of course, best remembered as one of the producers of the Original STAR TREK, which was pitched as "WAGON TRAIN in space"; Coon also wrote several episodes of the Western series.
Keith mumbles a lot of his line. He did that a lot. -
moewadle15 December 2013This appears to be a 1960s made for TV "special", perhaps with hopes of being a series. The credits say that Brian Keith is a guest star so this description means it was made for TV, not the movie theater. The running time is 75 minutes, which would likely have been a 90 min. TV "special" with commercials when made in 1963. While there are some prominent names in lead roles, as well as supporting cast (Robert Culp, Brian Keith, Harry Carey, Jr.) the story deteriorates rapidly and the production standards are ridiculous. Calamity Jane is one of the characters and, as pointed out elsewhere on this site, her costuming and make-up are so incredible that it borders on high camp. In summary, I am a 71 year-old western film fan and have a large collection of western films. On the one hand this makes me hard to please because westerns are one of my "specialties," but on the other hand I can sit through a somewhat poor western because I can enjoy the sets, costumes, characters,etc particular to that genre. However, in this case, when I found it on the Encore Western Channel, I watched it for 30 minutes and found it so boring that I could not finish. So, my behavior is my recommendation. Do not waste your time.
-
bkoganbing29 March 2015The Raiders was one of the last films you will see made taking what was standard historical interpretation at the time point of view that the Reconstruction period was when the sadistic and moneygrubbing carpetbag governments squeezed the last ounce of pride from the fallen Confederacy. The Civil Rights revolution put an end to all of that.
The Raiders starts out as a cut down version of The Texans or Red River with Brian Keith trying with his fellow cattlemen to get that big herd to Missouri. Only they have far less success than Randolph Scott or John Wayne in those other classics. Beaten and beat Keith and his comrades go to Fort Hays and see temporary commander Alfred Ryder and railroad man Addison Richard. They veto a southern route and Keith says no southern route, no railroad at all.
At this point the film switches to something like Cecil B. DeMille's The Plainsman where Robert Culp, James McMullan, and Judi Meredith play Wild Bill Hickok, Buffalo Bill Cody, and Calamity Jane Canary respectively. Culp takes the lead in trying to avoid some big trouble, but Keith is proud and angry and Ryder is a tin soldier martinet who carries a Texas Minie Ball in his leg from the late Civil War. In fact Ryder has the juiciest role in the film.
I'm guessing this was a pilot for a possible TV series that Culp, McMullan and Meredith would have starred in. The Civil Rights Revolution and changing attitudes would make this kind of film unacceptable. You rarely saw southern heroes after The Raiders came out.
As it is it's no different than a lot of what was on television because it was meant for television. It might worked in 1953 even, but not in the Sixties. -
As another reviewer has pointed out, "The Raiders" is a movie which takes what might be called a broadly neo-Confederate position about the years following the American Civil War. This position, which has been called the "Myth of the Lost Cause", holds that the Confederate cause during the Civil War was a just one, that the war had little if anything to do with slavery and was instead a "war of Northern aggression" which ended in the supposed injustices imposed on the defeated Southerners during the Reconstruction Era.
The main characters are a group of Texas ranchers, left financially destitute by the war. To avoid being exploited by corrupt Northern carpetbaggers, they attempt to drive their herds from Texas to the nearest rail-head in Kansas, but lose their cattle to attacks by bandits and hostile Indians. Despite having no cattle to sell, they ride on to Kansas where they demand that the Kansas and Pacific Railroad build a new railway line into Texas. When the railroad management refuse to comply with their demand, they (all seven of them!) form themselves into a guerrilla army to fight the railroad and prevent its westward expansion into Colorado. Despite the illegal nature of their activities, which today would probably be characterised as terrorism, the ranchers are presented as the heroes of the film, and the US Army officer (a Northerner, of course) who tries to stop them as the villain.
The film also features three legendary figures of the Old West- Wild Bill Hickok, Calamity Jane and Buffalo Bill Cody- shown as taking part in adventures very different from anything they did in real life. A similar device, using the same three characters, along with a fourth, General Custer, was used in Cecil B de Mille's "The Westerner". Hickok is here normally referred to as "Jim", probably to distinguish between himself and Buffalo Bill. (Hickok's real name was James, but he was normally known by his nickname Wild Bill). The real Calamity Jane would only have been a teenager at the time of the events shown here, but the character played by Judi Meredith, who would have been 27 in 1963, is rather older. She wears tight leather trousers, in a style more that of the 1960s and 1860s. The makers of Westerns occasionally tried to make them sexier by dressing attractive young female characters in twentieth-century fashions which no nineteenth-century woman would have worn. (Think of Marilyn Monroe's equally tight jeans in "River of No Return").
This is a film with little going for it, quite apart from its objectionable political stance. The acting and the script are undistinguished. The ranchers' demand- that a publicly funded railroad should, on their say-so, divert its finances into the construction of an unauthorised branch line several hundred miles long- is both unrealistic and unreasonable, something the film-makers blatantly overlook. They also overlook the ridiculous nature of the idea that seven, mostly elderly, men- the most unlikely guerrilla army since Citizen Smith's Tooting Popular Front- could present any sort of serious threat to American military power. A plot like this one could, just about, have served as the basis for a comedy spoof Western like "Blazing Saddles". That the film-makers used it as the basis of a supposedly serious movie defies belief. 3/10. -
gkhege19 July 2017As an avid western watcher for over 60 years. I recently watched , The Raiders,for the 15th time. It still remains one of the, should have and probably was, made with the television watching audience in mind type movies. Boring and predictable, it puts me to sleep every single time I attempt to watch it.
-
searchanddestroy-123 October 2022I hope you'll not get bored with this predictable and over used scheme of cattle owners and drivers fighting against cattle rustlers and Indians. It is boring, without any surprise, and the second part ridiculous at the most possible, with real Old West characters such as William Buffalo Bill Cody, Calamity Jane and Wild Bill Hickok. I don't know history that much, but I am not sure those characters met in real life, and all this mess spoils all the pleasure that I could take from this western. I know, there were plenty like this one, tons of them, but that's not a reason to make efforst to bear this. Directing is OK, from a TV episode maker, Brian Keith convincing but that's all. Robert Culp ridiculous as Wld Bill Hickock.