User Reviews (91)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    If you want two hours of enjoyment, forget about it. This is one of the most depressing films ever made. Every grim feature of post war North of England is piled on in black and white - chimneys, mean terraces, cooling towers, mucky fields, stunted ambition and rising damp. A contemporary view of the early 1960s, you're given all the warts and none of the glitter.

    But both performance and plot reek with power and there is a compulsive attraction to see a story through to a bitter end that you know has no trace of sentiment. The tight coldness of Margaret Hammond (Rachel Roberts), steadfastly refusing to let herself be happy for a second time in her life, grinds against the macho world that Frank Machin (Richard Harris) has climbed into.

    It is one of Harris's two great roles and came near the start of his career (the other being Bull McCabe in "The Field" which came near the end) and possibly came closest to the forces that drove him through his life. His skill at and love of rugby gives the sporting dimension of the film a realism that very few others can match. Much of the passion that he showed on the screen came from experiences on the playing field in a career that was cut short through illness before he could realise his full potential. Anger at that lost opportunity is seen better in this film than in any other he made.

    There are many other films in this genre when British cinema turned its back on elegance or heroism but none has captured the mood of resentment better than this. More than forty years on, it's still as raw as ever.
  • "This Sporting Life" is one of the most famous of the British "kitchen sink" dramas of the 1950s and 1960s ("kitchen sink" films were very gritty, social realist films which were very popular in Britain at one time).

    Frank Machin (Richard Harris) is a brutal, young miner in a city in northern England. Hoping for fame and fortune, he becomes a successful Rugby League football player. He uses his fame and fortune, along with physical violence, to try to force his widowed landlady (Rachel Roberts) to fall for him.

    Photographed in bleak black-and-white, the film's scenes of emotional and physical domestic violence are still shocking today. Also notable are the violent, stylishly-shot rugby matches.

    The cast are brilliant without exception, especially Richard Harris who manages to invest even his totally unsympathetic character with some degree of humanity.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's funny; the more this story went on, the more the two lead characters went 180 degrees in the other direction. "Frank Machin" went from a rough-but-quiet and considerate rugby player trying to befriend a single mother to a complete boor and a pig. "Margaret Hammond" was a rude, dour woman with a real attitude problem regarding life. It takes her a long time to crack a smile and show some twinges of happiness. It's nice to see, but it doesn't last.

    Margaret preferred to wallow in past pain. Except for her kids, which she doesn't dwell on anyway, she didn't want to have much to do with life. Even in the end, a doctor notes something about her will to live being weak. (You'd think having two nice kids would be motivation to live.) Anyway, she does slowly began smiling and opening up and being a nice person. However, Frank and Margaret are rarely on the same page. When they were, they made a nice couple.

    The film also went from a tight, action-drama in the first half hour to a straight drama the second half hour to a melodrama over the last hour. It had a tightness in the beginning, an edgy feel to it, whether it was Frank on the playing field or trying to make headway with Margaret and her two small kids. Then, it slowly got almost into a soap opera mindset but still kept my interest if only to find out what wound happen to this "couple."

    Kudso to Richard Harris and Rachel Roberts ("Margaret") for keeping it interesting because it's a fairly long film and there is a long segment where very little happens. Both Harris and Roberts were up for Academy Awards. I thought Harris was the standout here. It's hard to be a loutish rugby jock on one hand and a tender, caring guy at the same time, but Harris pulled it off. He made Machin a very believable character with that tough-soft combination. He even looked the part: a rough guy who could (and did in real life) muck it up with the best of 'em in a very physical sport. Harris was so good that one minute you really rooted for him; the next minute you'd think "the hell with this moron."

    Roberts evoked similar emotions. You wanted this bitter and angry woman to be happy, yet sometimes you thought she didn't deserve someone who seemed to care. As a man, I felt Frank's frustration in trying to get to this lady, who might have a lot to offer (besides sex) if she'd just let go of the past and her anger. She's also upset about being a "kept woman," something this generation doesn't understand. In Margaret's day, you didn't stay in the same house with a man unless you were married. The neighbors were talking, and she was shamed. Roberts, I am told, had many demons in her life and didn't have the career of her co-star, but she was a fine, fine actress.

    Both these man characters were simple and complex, at the same time. This is why I looked at this film as a character study of two people, instead of a depressing melodrama, which some have labeled it. Yeah, it's not "Mary Poppins" but I didn't find it that depressing. I also enjoyed William Hartnell as "Dad" Johnson. I wish his role had been bigger. He was a very intriguing guy. The rugby team's owners were portrayed - as many were back then - as nothing but exploitive.

    Another big part of the reason I basically enjoyed the film was the excellent direction and photography, and the fantastic DVD transfer given to us by Criterion. This is a pristine print: no spots, now flaws - just a fabulous picture. If you enjoy the cinematography of film noir, you'll like this. If you appreciate powerful human dramas, you'll find it worth your while.
  • This Sporting Life may be a touch overlong, but it is overall a truly brilliant movie and still hits hard after all these years. It has a very realistic story, and the characters are given so much depth and realism it is hard not to empathise. The cinematography is wonderful, the setting is truly evocative, the direction is superb and the screenplay truthful and honest. There are many superb scenes, particularly some truly remarkable scenes of confrontation that are honest to the point it verges on painful to listen. As for the acting, Richard Harris and Rachel Roberts really do give the roles of their live in This Sporting Life, and are both absolutely brilliant as the ruthless professional rugby player and repressed widowed landlady with whom he can only communicate with through violence, and they are finely supported by the likes of Alan Badel and William Hartnell. Overall, brilliant film with a great cast and a hard-hitting sense of realism. 9/10 Bethany Cox
  • Gripping, arresting and totally believable from the start, this is excitingly authentic. The terrible game of rugby league football is beautifully shot in all the horror of its violent thuggery and macho heroism. The streets, the houses, the shops, the pubs, the clubs and the children playing all evoke memories of that admittedly dreary but familiar visions. The living spaces, some cramped and dinged, like mine a that time, and others spacious and exuding that illusive smell of success (or upper class thuggery!) All this is fine and Richard Harris is fully believable as the film's angry young man. It is just that as the, rather overlong, film continues we get less of the 'sporting life' and the 'dead end streets' and more of the 'love' story and rather clumsy stabs at class warfare. In the end we are rather tiring of all the 'I love you', 'I hate you' cries and welcome the closing credit but it is still very much a worth seeing film that probably catches more of what it really felt like to be in Britain late 50s/early 60s than any other film I have seen.
  • Xstal7 February 2023
    There's a very angry lad by name of Frank, miner by day, weekends he's down the flank, quite a vile kind of guy, couldn't like him if you tried, if he had a chain you'd give it a good yank. He lodges with a lady Mrs. Hammond, he rants and raves, and issues her demands, of how to live her life, causing conflict, grief and strife, he's just desperate to ensnare, to trap, then bond. A chance to become pro, is signed and sealed, gives him money he can brandish, ply and wield, force landlady to his ways, bullies her until she lays, she's defenceless, has no cover, she has no shield.

    One of the most dislikeable characters you're likely to come across, brilliantly performed by Richard Harris, who only occasionally reminds us of his native brogue, while he destroys the life of his landlady, superbly performed by Rachel Roberts. It's just a shame that people like this still exist today.
  • Set in the working class environs of Northern England (Yorkshire), this is a stark and uncompromising film. Richard Harris gives a performance of a lifetime as a rugby player who, both on and off the field of play, seems able to express himself only through violence.

    Lindsay Anderson directs wonderfully, insisting on gritty realism, and stripping everything of any hint of cinematic glamour. Unlike the French "nouvelle vague", Anderson wasn't interested in technique for its own sake: he was more concerned with actual substance. Here, he explores the depths of the characters, and their relationships with each other; and, in particular, their emotions, which are volcanic. Never have such naked passions been portrayed on screen with such power. One feels somewhat drained by the end.

    Something was happening in the British cinema in the 60s. Where did it all disappear?
  • I saw this at a theater years ago. It had sunk into what appears to be obscurity -- highly undeservedly. Tonight I saw it on the small screen. And as powerful and, oddly, as shockingly intimate as it is, it doesn't work as well this way.

    Why? The reason is the structure. The straightforward scenes are searing.. But there are hallucinations that have Richard Harris now in one situation, then in another, then lying back in the dentist's chair. Call me a Philistine but on a 20-inch screen this Resnais-like "Is it or isn't it?" is hard to follow.

    That said, it is a beautiful movie overall. The lead performances have rarely been equaled. Richard Harris, as a headstrong rugby player, is convincing 100%. Rachel Roberts plays the rather dour, confused and grieving widow from whom he lets a room and whom he loves. She was not conventionally beautiful but she had extraordinary screen presence. Their every scene together is chilling and poignant.

    The structure is there. The movie is finished and could never be properly well made. It is a sort of angry young man meets French New Wave. Anyone reading this who might be put off by my confession about finding it a bit rough to follow on a TV screen: Please do not be put off. This is a very serious, insightful movie, well performed all around. And you are unlikely to see Harris better in anything else and, sadly, unlikely to see Ms. Roberts in much else at all.
  • British New Wave auteur Lindsay Anderson's feature debut, a "kitchen sink" drama of the first order, stars Harris as Frank Machin, an aggressive coal-miner-turned-rugby-player in Wakefield, who lodges in with a widow Ms. Margaret Hammond (Roberts) and her two young children. He is a rough diamond type, an indomitable "ape" on the field, but constantly perturbed by dissatisfaction and loneliness, he is pining for being wanted, especially by Margaret, who always gives him cold shoulder over his benevolent advances.

    The film starts with intimate close-ups of the men-to-men action during an ongoing game, which echoes with its bleak ending, the same Frank in the field, doing the only thing he is really good at, to continue his life. After a sucker punch knocks him out in cold, he is taken to a dentist to fix his messed-up teeth, under the influence of anesthetic, the narrative begins to alternate between flashbacks and the current time-frame, a tactic sometimes can cause unnecessary confusion, for instance, I cannot ascertain the sequence where he punches a fellow player Len (Watson) happens in the flashback or after the dentist, also why does he do that?

    Soon we will know, Frank gets his start with the help of 'Dad' Johnson (Hartnell), an elderly scout for the local rugby league club owner Gerald Weaver (Badel), Anderson subtly implies there is a latent homo-eroticism among the rugby business, not just the graphic roughhousing among macho and burly players, also from 'Dad', whom Margaret observe from their first meeting that his ogling look at Frank means something more than just a friend; and the perpetually suave Mr. Weaver, once impulsively reveals his intention with a seemingly casual pinch on Frank's thigh, which Anderson particularly singles out in intimacy. Although this strand doesn't pan out because of Frank's crass manner and erratic behavior, it certainly validates Anderson's unorthodox perception.

    After all, the main selling point is between Frank and Margaret, Harris and Roberts (then still Ms. Rex Harrison, and who would sadly commit suicide in 1980 at the age of 53) both pull out all the stops to elicit possibly their career-best performances. They are both gravely flawed characters, deep inside Frank is solely a naive and insecure boy wanting love albeit his masculine aggression, and Margaret is a damaged good stranded in a traumatic tragedy and barely sustained by the intention to live, thus, his one-sided courtship in her eyes is merely to objectify her as a kept woman, and she eventually complies, but she doesn't love him, she is the one who is incapable of love, because as we audience can testify, Frank is not that bad as a person, yes, he is a volatile woman-beater, an insolent jackass, without too much education, but he has the sense of justice, and he is craving for a reciprocal feeling of being wanted. The only happy moment between them is an outing with two kids, Frank can be a good father figure, but Margaret will never let that happen, both are too obstinate to compromise, Frank can easily choose another object, but no, he will not take no as an answer.

    Richard Harris superbly brings about Frank's multifarious personae, he is a blunt force of nature, yet he can also be quietly implosive in haunting close-ups. Like his close friends Richard Burton and Peter O'Toole, he is another British thespian to whom Oscar owes a golden statue. Rachel Roberts, incredibly augments tensions and empathy against her around-the-clock sullen facade and dead inside, fairly enough, both are Oscar-nominated.

    Anderson showcases his brilliant expertise of shooting scenes with rapid movements and indoors close-ups, the monochromatic palette effectively adds a layer of fatalism to a rather dispiriting melodrama anchored by two powerhouse performances, truly is one of the best of its time.
  • ...but if you've had a bellyful of that whole 'angry young working class man' era (1950s through to the 1970s) of film-making, replete with gritty depictions of how hard life - and the people living it - were (and this was true for the majority of Brits...for the majority of the 20th century!), you'll give this a miss, despite the excellent acting from acting luminaries such as the young Richard Harris and Rachel Roberts, etc (indeed, it's difficult to fault ANY of the performances in this film) and the then-cutting edge directing and relatively unusual theme of rugby in a working class area (generally known as the sport used to toughen up privileged middle-to-upper-class boys at private schools - no doubt it made for an excellent foreshadowing of the military, for which many of those boys were destined!). Personally, I found the whole thing compelling (due to the performances and the 'slice-of- history' aspect - before my time, but definitely well within the living memory of several of my English relatives) yet ultimately deeply depressing - and far two long/desperately in need of an edit; for one thing, the endless adaptations of 'real life' novels featuring working class animal-sexuality hero has been done to death in British cinema (pioneered of course by DH Lawrence, who was roughly 30 years ahead of his time and didn't live long enough to see the triumph of his 'type', though he, personally, paid a fairly high price for pioneering it); for another, the closed-down-emotions of various men and women/widows clearly suffering from various forms of unexplained post-traumatic stress syndrome (though it is never explained explicitly, it is clear that the leading lady's husband committed suicide because he was suffering from depression as a result of sustaining trauma during service in the war - something so many men struggled with; therefore, though she is attracted to the brash young (too young to have served) lodger who clearly wants her, he cannot relate to the extent of her own trauma of loss, grief and insecurity, which he clumsily attempts to 'snap her out of' in various mostly misfired ways, receiving absolutely no support or guidance from her or anyone else as to how to gain her trust and win her heart and hand!) - I just find watching this kind of mass misunderstanding and miscommunication and mangled affections and misread gestures of love and good intentions akin to watching a train wreck!!
  • To my mind, and to many others, This Sporting Life is the essential, character-driven British exponent of that 1960's realism, 'kitchen sink' drama.

    With its moody and stark black & white photography and a similarly moody and stark, career best (my opinion) performance by Richard Harris - and the settings are as they were in Northern England back then. Yes, you guessed it - moody and stark.

    Coal mining is, or was a tough job. For an ambitious man, that wasn't quite enough for Frank Machin (Harris) and so, when his way of showing off and 'getting the ladies', Saturday afternoon rugby league turns good, he milks it dry. This, goes to his head and becomes a weapon of oneupmanship, to lever his ego above those of his friends and work colleagues.

    But, for all the hard, realism on the field, it's the poignant but also often aggressive outcomes with the women who creep into his life. Especially for his landlady, who in some ways, remains the only relative constant in his topsy-turvy world. They're not the meek and demure ones that maybe he would emotionally feel comfortable with - and preferred - and their truths hurt him as much as the injuries he gets on the pitch.

    I find the film riveting and memorable, but also hard work and some might say, it's a little melodramatic at times. But, that was the style back then and the character is certainly able to support it. I feel I should have given it ten stars, but then that would diminish (albeit very slightly) those few I do.
  • sol-15 April 2016
    Conscious during grueling dental surgery after an accident on the sports field, an egotistical rugby player recalls the highs and many lows of his sporting career in this stark British drama starring Richard Harris. Both Harris and co-star Rachel Roberts (playing a widowed landlady who he romances) received Oscar nominations for their roles, and both deliver fine turns, coming across as real human beings struggling to make it in a world where the odds seem stacked against them. The film's arguable best assets though are its dreamy flashback structure and Roberto Gerhard's terse and unsettling music score -- and neither of these elements is consistent throughout. The music is mostly limited to the first few scenes, while the flashback structure oddly vanishes partway in and the film does not quite have the same edge with events playing out in real time. Between his constant bitterness and elevated sense of self-importance, Harris has a totally dislikeable character and he is consequently most sympathetic when in the dentist chair and forced to reflect. That said, the film is still fairly powerful in the post-dental scenes as Harris has very down-to-earth things to say, realising that rugby is not a lifetime career and stating "I need something for good... something permanent". His scenes in the hospital towards the end are great too, and while quite brutal, the spider sequence truly seems to epitomise the culmination of negative emotions within him. This is quite an unhappy film and not the easiest one to watch, but it leaves an indelible impression for sure.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    If there's one thing wealthy English middle-class film directors like to do its patronise those unfortunates who are forced to live outside the area now bounded by the M25.Of course in 1963 it was strictly a notional boundary,as the world's biggest car park was just a gleam in some town planner's eye,but a boundary it was nonetheless. If such a director was to set his intrepid foot in the direction marked "North" on the compass,he would return home with his daily rushes as proud as Armand and Michaela Dennis with their exotic shots of life in Africa. Life in Yorkshire was as unfathomable to the Bryanston Mafia as tribal customs in Rwanda. The makers of "This sporting life" have failed to comprehend that in making a film highlighting the hypocrisy of middle class northerners exploiting the talent of their own working class they are looking into a mirror like Caliban.Either that or they are exercising an even greater hypocrisy of their own. Yorkshire in 1963 seemed hardly to have recovered from the depression,it was like one of those Eastern European countries under the Soviet yoke,with beer instead of vodka to keep the population manageable.The archetypal warm-hearted Northerner full of mother wit and good cheer had yet to be invented by the TV companies and the people seemed cold of eye and repressed.Then,as now,sport seemed to be the only conduit to wealth for poorly educated barely literate young men. Frank Machin,clearly a bear of very little brain,is good at rugby.Up North this is not a gentlemanly game with japes in the showers and a few rude songs in the bar afterwards,it is deadly serious.Then,Mr Machin is not exactly the life and soul of the party.He is the sort of bloke beloved of Guardianistas everywhere,the inarticulate working man,unable to express his feelings except through physical action,how utterly utterly unlike their own home life of course.They nod wisely when his frustrations explode,cooing with sympathy but making sure they are nowhere near him when it happens. However unlikely it may seem,Frank,fit young and virile sportsman that he is,fancies his landlady,an embittered,dried up widow with a mouth like a rattrap,and old enough to be his mother.Dark stuff this. The rest you can work out from "The film and TV scriptwriters' guide to stereotypical Northern drama". The film was ludicrously overpraised on its release and I saw it in an East London cinema that was 80% empty.A fair number of the remaining 20% voted with their feet long before the end.I sat it out because I had paid 3 shillings and ninepence(about 18p) for the privilege and I was only earning £9 per week so it constituted a sizeable proportion of my daily wage.Rugby League players in Yorkshire wouldn't have got out of bed for that.Especially their landladies' bed. "This sporting life" is too clever by far,a positive plethora of directors' tricks,flashy camera-work and nostalgie de la boue.Richard Harris overacts wildly with that grim determination to be true to life that ends up being nothing like real life at all.Rachel Roberts ,poor thing,spends most of the film looking dead before she actually does pass away.Many British thesps polish up their sort "a"s and nobody says"There's trooble at 't' mill" as far as I can remember,but much of the dialogue is at that level.Mr Anderson carried on in much the same vein for some years and gained the reputation as a sympathetic chronicler of the working class.Well,sympathetic he might have been - accurate he wasn't.With sympathy and £1.99 I can buy a Big Mac.
  • Frank Machin is an amateur rugby league player in Yorkshire. Ambitious within the sport, Frank pushes himself in front of the local scouts and soon is signed to one of the professional clubs and able to hold out for £1000 down to join. As he rises within his own world, Frank has more resources and more opportunity but a strained affair with his landlady Margaret and his inability to shake off his basic roots see him frustrated and pained with his journey.

    Like many others have said in relation to this film, British cinema did have something at one point. The "Free Cinema" movement of the 1950's gave a home to a slightly more realistic form of cinema and, although I do not like all within that "movement" that I have seen, I do think that Anderson's work with that paved the way for this. At times the film is too keen to revel in the depiction of working class England but this isn't too much and perhaps, if you think of the context of the period (where such views were not the norm) then you can perhaps understand why. However the power of the film is less in its depiction of the working class work (although this is indeed of value) but more in the convincing exploration of the character of Frank.

    Here is a man who has aspirations but seems unable to reconcile these goals to be "better" with the fact that he is from the working classes and doesn't fit with those above him. Likewise he needs affection, love and intimacy but his outward emotions are much cruder and he is quick to lose his temper and resort to violence as the simplest reaction. It is a well written script and it doesn't push the characters or emotions past where they would naturally go for the sake of the film; you can see this in the conclusion which is meaningful and ultimately quite downbeat. Anderson's direction is suitably gritty and natural for the material, but it was Harris that impressed me most.

    His performance can be mistaken for being a bit showy and loud and some viewers have made that call. However for me this was his character's boorishness, a quality that he sinks into with ease. However where Harris really does his best work is in the moments just before this happens, or immediately afterwards where, without words, we can often see this struggle, this conflict within himself. It is hard for me to describe here in words so think how difficult it must be to do as an actor but Harris pulls it off. He is well supported by Roberts and they share some excellent scenes. Smaller roles are also well filled with natural turns from the likes of Hartnell, Lowe, Blakely and others; but the film is Harris'.

    Not perfect and perhaps a little longer than it can sustain, this is an impressive film. The working class depiction does seem a bit heavy at times through modern eyes but in the emotion and development of the characters the film is hard to really question. Engaging, well written and well delivered – like others have said, where are the British classics like this now? Four Weddings? Do me a favour...
  • grantss1 August 2015
    Great movie.

    Ostensibly a sport-drama but the main plot of the movie is as a relationship / human drama. Very thoughtful and emotional plot.

    Great, gritty direction by Lindsay Anderson. The use of black-and- white photography helped the feeling of desolation, melancholy and emotional emptiness.

    Requires some patience though - starts slowly.

    Good performances by Richard Harris and Rachel Roberts, both of whom received Oscar nominations for their efforts.

    Worth watching.
  • This title mostly stays obscurely distant to the wider audience, which is utterly sad, almost as the movie itself. "This sporting life" marks era of the British New Wave, but it is somehow off the French mellow tracks. Frank Machin is rude and robust, just like the circumstances of time and place. After swift uplift of cinematic themes, which almost totally set WWII into background, 1960ies made Brits turn the mirror inwards. Medium of film was open for investigating and reflecting what hides in one's inner and where could it lead. In circle, surely, as well-tried French recipe of the era already settled the never-ending mental pattern.

    This is basically a love story, a tale of two fairly different people joined in their solitude. They glide through scenery of urban and mental squalor, wonderfully photographed by Denys N. Coop. Shades of the mind are so aptly blended with interiors and every feeling convincingly underlined by many (but never one too many) close-ups. By my account, the only moment which was superfluous happened in the fancy restaurant: Frank taking Margaret and her new fur-coat to dinner to a place that was never intended for them. Frank's rawness in the situation was a bit over the top, movie could have well done without it, or at least with having it toned down.

    Nevertheless, poetry is inevitable. Lindsay Anderson managed to draw tenuity out of time, places and persons who struggled against each other. Finale offered the only possible solution: For those who stayed – "after all…tomorrow is another day."
  • Other reviews will describe the grim imagery and relay the kitchen sink stuff, but for me THIS SPORTING LIFE has a visceral reality I can feel, from the cold mud, to the cold hearts. Richard Harris certainly is somewhere near the waterfront with Marlon on this one, and certainly Lindsay Anderson would have seen the film funded on the strength of making a British near equivalent of the 1954 Brando film. Harris is magnificent as the young bull willing to emotionally commit to a squeamish widow and her two kids. He lays his heart on the line for everyone in this film and his character takes leaps of loving willingness and faith only to be flung in the mud constantly. He begs for a family life and begs for a chance to be a husband. The peripheral characters of the football club are well realized and frank talk of desire from all genders, along with astonishing male nudity make this a film that still holds an audience. Only a few times does the story slip (the flophouse scene) but the brutal sexual reality of freezing grimy little houses with freezing cranky little souls is clear to see. A massive sad masterpiece of 1963 Brit film making. Harris a magnetic as the wounded gladiator seriously wanting love and family.
  • You know, the more I watch English movies from the 1960's, the more I fall in love with them, Films like I'm all Right Jack, Darling, Alfie, and now, This Sporting Edge, always feature the U.K. as this gritty place, where living is tough, and the people are tougher. Now, whether that's true to life I'm not sure (though I'd be interested to find out) but I sure get a kick out of these films, and I'm glad to add This Sporting Life to that list.

    Richard Harris just acts the hell out of his role as a Miner who finds his forte as a star Rugby player. Let's stop here. Why aren't there any more Rugby movies? Soccer and Boxing are always popular sports in movies, but Rugby seems to be sadly neglected. Perhaps they thought this was the definitive movie on this subject? Anyways, Richard Harris's character, Frank Machin, maybe is a brilliant rugby player, but sort of not so in life, but that doesn't stop him from trying to succeed with what he has. The rich people, who of course, have control over the teams, give him some opportunities to move up in the Rugby world.. Some which he's comfortable with, like dropping his Father like a hot potato, other conditions, he's left wondering how low he has to go to make it big. Oooh.

    So while Machin is trying to move up in the Rugby world, at home, he's trying to make the the move on his INCREDIBLY repressed landlady, played by Rachel Roberts. Who's that? I've never heard of her up to this movie, and seeing her in this makes me want to see more of her, because she's fabulous in this.

    All in all, a great view.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    A gritty kitchen sink drama from director Lindsay Anderson, THIS SPORTING LIFE is a character study of a man struggling with existential angst and the driving motivations of conquest and anger that are causing his life to spiral out of control. Richard Harris, unrecognisable in his youth, plays the burly rugby star attempting to woe the widow who just happens to be his own landlady; there's plenty of drama and conflict along the way, alongside the usual British character actors. It's engaging stuff, with more to say than the comparable likes of BILLY LIAR.
  • Watching Richard Harris' performance as Frank Machin in Lindsay Anderson's 1963 masterpiece "This Sporting Life" you might be reminded of Marlon Brando's work in "A Streetcar Named Desire" or indeed of Robert De Niro's Jake La Motta in Scorsese's later "Raging Bull", (Scorsese's film owes a great deal to "This Sporting Life" without ever quite measuring up). All three characters share the same animalistic intensity and an inability to communicate except in the most primordial level. This was the film that made Harris a star and it's his greatest performance; he was nominated for the Oscar and won the Best Actor prize at Cannes. His co-star is the great Rachel Roberts as the widowed landlady who takes Machin into her bed. Like Harris, she too was nominated and deservedly so; she's as fine here as she was in Karl Reisz's "Saturday Night and Sunday Morning", (Reisz produced this film while Anderson made his feature debut as a director). David Storey did the superb adaptation from his own novel and the brilliant supporting cast included Alan Badel, William Hartnell and Colin Blakely. Denys Coop was responsible for the cinematography and Peter Taylor was the editor. It's still one of the finest of all films that uses sport both as a backdrop and as a metaphor and is one of the greatest of all 'kitchen-sink' movies.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This was part of a semi-revolution in British cinema when it was released. Britain seemed to be emerging from its long, long post-war pulling together and putting a lot of effort into defining a new expressive culture. There were "the angry young men" of literature and drama, "Saturday Night and Sunday Morning," the Rockers and the Mods -- all sorts of dendritic feelers trying to find a new and stronger cultural pulse.

    "This Sporting Life" was pretty typical of the period. There's a framing story of poor Richard Harris, a pro football player who has had some dental damage that must be fixed, and most of the film consists of flashbacks to the development of Harris's character.

    It doesn't end happily but then the whole movie is relentlessly depressing. Harris himself rarely seems pleased and even more rarely expresses happiness. Well, sometimes he gets drunk or has a stroke of good luck, and then he smiles. He lives in a room he rents from Rachel Roberts, an embittered widow. The game itself is rough. The industrial slums are dismal.

    I found the despair smothering but I can understand why it was considered revolutionary. It's like an ethnography of a tribe that has been neglected by anthropologists. And this is nothing like the Hollywood sports stories of the 1950s: hero accidentally discovers a monstrous talent, rises through the ranks with the help of a few others, encounters demons, falls to the basement, rediscovers his inner strength and comes back to win the Big Prize. This isn't formulaic. It's more like John Huston's "Fat City," a study of the vernacular. It gets extra points for that.

    Actually, I realize that, though I had seen it years ago, I wasn't going to be able to sit through it a second time at a particular moment in the film. Harris has invited a doddering old friend into the sitting room and the old codger shovels a bit more fuel into the stove to warm the place up. Rachel Roberts, the landlady, enters and remarks, "You know we don't have enough coal for that." Clunk. As a viewer, I knew then how Harris's mouth felt after that initial injury.
  • Having seen the film several times I can relate to the lifestyle of the characters, I was a child in the sixties and my memories of life back then are reflected in the atmostsphere that the film generates.

    I have read various comments about the film looking dated, and yes it does, but it is a true reflection on life at that time.

    It is also a great historical piece as many of the towns and sports arena's used in the film have changed drastically or no longer exist.

    I particularly remember the MECCA social club in Wakefield and the various coffee bars that surrounded it, Belle Vue where the Rugby League scenes were shot has stayed remarkably unchanged over the years and I still enjoy the atmostsphere as I watch my favourite team Wakefield Trinity Wildcats.

    To see the massive cooling towers in the background stirs memories of being there on a Saturday afternoon with my late Father Norman.

    I have a real soft spot for this film and I'm sorry that I have concentrated on my memories rather than the films content.
  • jboothmillard7 September 2010
    Warning: Spoilers
    From director Lindsay Anderson (if...), I knew from the obvious title what the film involved and who the leading actor was, but it was seeing it I was most anxious about. Basically, set in 1960's Yorkshire, Wakefield, Northern England, lives coal miner Frank Machin (Oscar and BAFTA nominated Richard Harris) who has the ambition to become a star rugby player. He joins the league team run by Gerald Weaver (Alan Badel), and he lodges with widowed Mrs. Margaret Hammond (BAFTA winning, and Oscar and Golden Globe nominated Rachel Roberts), who had her husband die in an accident. Frank has a very bad attitude that stops him getting to the places he really wants to, and his situation with Mrs. Anne Weaver (Vanda Godsell) doesn't do him any favours. I'll be honest, the moment when Frank has his front teeth knocked out really confuses you the rest of the way through because they are back and forth, I was wondering if the plot was linear, so I just enjoyed Frank getting bad tempered. Also starring Doctor Who's William Hartnell as 'Dad' Johnson, Colin Blakely as Maurice Braithwaite, Dad's Army's Arthur Lowe as Charles Slomer and Anne Cunningham as Judith. Harris does very well in the moments when he goes over the top and lashes out, and Roberts is really good as the woman who takes it all, the sporty moments were okay, I just wish all of it made more sense and I could agree with the critics five star rating, but it is worth seeing. It was nominated the BAFTAs for Best British Film, Best British Screenplay and Best Film from any Source, and it was nominated the Golden Globe for the Samuel Goldwyn Award. It was number 46 on Film 4's 50 Films To See Before You Die. Good, in my opinion!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I'd love to go back in time and review it as to what I felt when I first saw it. That was probably over ten years ago and a hundred or more British kitchen dramas ago, and in seeing this again, I see why it's considered a masterpiece in most circles yet derided as a pretentious overlong bore by a much smaller number of others. It's certainly not a film that I'd watch again if I had the choice, even though I can call this one of the most important films ever made that I disliked with two of the best performances so worthy of acknowledgement. Quite a conflict.

    The stars, Richard Harris and Rachel Roberts, are tremendous actors, and for fans of the campy Delia Darrow from "Foul Play", this is the complete opposite of Roberts as an actress. Her widowed character is so miserable that the thought of happiness in her life makes her even more depressed, as if even a glimpse of joy makes her fear getting used to it, only for joy to be quickly ripped away from her.

    The showy performance of Richard Harris is aggressive and mean, reflecting the hopelessness of the lower classes during this time, and his determination to make it out of that doesn't stop his never growing because he can't. He could win every athletic award in Great Britain and remain down because that's all he sees.

    So as realistic this is, the film never manages to rise above that hopelessness, and the viewer begins to feel all that long before the 135 minute film is over. This is a film that you have to be in a certain mood for, and as part of my second viewing, I realized I wasn't. Not the fault of the script or the stars or director Lindsay Anderson, just bloody bad timing.
An error has occured. Please try again.