User Reviews (14)

Add a Review

  • This film of Nelson Pereira dos Santos and another one called "Oz fuzis" or 'The guns' by Ruy Guerra are my favourite Brazilian movies. These films have mirrored the films of Mrinal Sen and Adoor Gopalakrishnan made in India at about the same time. The realism they offer and the rather unconventional use of the soundtrack affects the viewer, though seriously lacking in production quality. I know that most critics tend to classify these two Brazilian films as representative of the Cinema Nouvo, but I prefer to see the two as unusually impressive cinema, little affected by Hollywood. Vidas Secas in a way brings back memories of neo-realism in de Sica's "Bicycle Thief."

    The later work of dos Santos failed to impress me. He seems to have burned out--improving in technical qualities but losing out on artistic vision.
  • I rented this movie just because I had read the good book by Graciliano Ramos, back in 1992 in high school. When I played the video tape I really enjoyed what I saw. The slow rhythm is not an obstacle for us who want to have a great time watching a movie. It's the other way around, we just can't leave it once we realise "Vidas Secas" is an impressive narration of the difficulties poor people have when they try to move from their dying land in order to start a new life in the city. It's really time to press "play" and sit back.

    My rate 7/10
  • gaby0157522 August 2008
    An itinerant family's search for a better life seems to lead nowhere. The husband finds work as a cowhand, the wife wants nothing more than a leather bed to sleep in.

    The stark, black and white cinematography with which the sun-bleached, barren landscape was shot underscores the poverty the family is trying to escape. Kudos to the director who was able to coax an admirable performance from the family's dog. It's a totally engaging film w/ effectively subdued performances from the principals. Reminiscent of Italian Neo-Realist cinema, this makes for rewarding viewing, a cure for the summer blockbuster syndrome.
  • The illiterate migrants Fabiano (Átila Iório), his mate Sinhá Vitória (Maria Ribeiro), their two sons and their dog Baleia drift in the country of the Northeast of Brazil, fighting for their survival. They are hired by a farmer (Jofre Soares) in a slavery condition to take care of his kettle.

    "Vidas Secas" is a classic of the Brazilian Cinema and the first movie of the "Cinema Novo" ("New Cinema"), a movement of the Brazilian filmmakers in the 60's that proposed to make low-budget movies with social concerns and rooted in Brazilian culture, which had the following slogan: "A camera in the hands and an idea in the head".

    Nelson Pereira dos Santos made a masterpiece, certainly on of the best Brazilian movies ever. Based on a classic novel of the Brazilian literature of Graciliano Ramos, the reality and cruelty of the story is stunning. The black and white photography and the performances of the cast, including the dog, are very impressive, recalling the Italian Neo-Realism of Roberto Rossellini. This movie was made in 1963, the story happens in the 40's and presently the situation of the drought in the country of the Northeast of Brazil remains exactly the same, being one of our greatest national shames. My vote is ten.

    Title (Brazil): "Vidas Secas" ("Dry Lives")
  • Typical representative of the call "Cinema Novo" in Brazil, that film is beautiful. With picture in black and white, the history was based on a classic of the Brazilian literature and it rotates around a family it expels of your earth for the dry climate, with thirst and hunger, migrating for an inhospitable landscape in search of a better life. Even a character so difficult of representing, the female dog " Baleia ", it has an anthological interpretation.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    One of the defining films of Brazil's cinema novo, Pereira dos Santos' "Vidas Secas" revolves around an impoverished couple, their two small sons and the family dog, as they navigate a hellish landscape, struggling to survive without food, money or water.

    Skeletal trees, humans and animals are associated with one another, lifeless and on the verge of death, whilst Baleia, the family dog, remains the only figure of life and energy. As long as he is alive, the audience knows the family has hope. He protects them from extinction.

    Time and time again the family are saved from starvation, but things get worse when the family hire themselves out to a nasty land owner who refuses to pay and whips and jails their father for no offence. When he's released we expect the film to turn into a revolutionary tract, the peasants rising up against the land owners, but Santos doesn't believe in fairy tales.

    As the family edges closer to death, Baleia becomes sick. Father shoots the dog to ease its suffering. It dies, dooming the family and sealing their fate. They walk off into the desert, on the road again, without hope or destination. "Will we ever be human?" the son asks, as they fade away.

    8/10 - The influences of the Italian neo-realists and Satyajit Ray are all over this, and like most of these films, "Vidas Secas" is a bit too poetic, a bit to romantic in its portrayal of poverty (there is always an uneasy tension between cinemas renderings of poverty and the sophistication or expensiveness of the medium). Nevertheless, the film work well as a slice of political activism and in its own quiet way, is far more powerful than all of Oliver Stone's heavy handed preaching.
  • Vidas Secas had that same neorealist, slice of life feel that Bicycle Thieves and Pather Panchali have, but it didn't do quite as much for me thematically. The big focus was on how it's very difficult to survive and work in the barren Brazilian desert. The thing the film does best is establish a clear atmosphere - the slow long shots of the expansive desert and realistic, character driven story do a lot to emphasize how difficult it is to live there. It's not a film where I was emotionally drawn into the lives of the characters, the way I was in Bicycle Thieves, and I found the major messages of the movie to be muddled (aside from the main theme of how difficult it is to survive there). The repetition of the scene asking for work early in the film was really odd, and the random pivot to the older boy asking questions about hell and getting into that can be explained but came a bit out of nowhere for me, as up to that point the focus was on the father's attempt to work and the family struggles. In general, it just felt like a well shot but somewhat shallow slow, slice of life Brazilian film. Maybe I've just been spoiled by some of the great neorealist films we've watched though, and I'm sure there are some elements I didn't notice.
  • One of the 5 best brazilian movies of all times. That's the opinion of the brazilian critics, and became obvious for everyone who see the film. A precise recreation of the Graciliano Ramos masterpiece by the "father" of "Cinema Novo". Definitively, a classic.
  • guisreis19 September 2020
    As the great director Nelson Pereira dos Santos was, he delivered a consistent movie on the harsh life conditions of scarcity and hunger in Northeastern Brazilian hinterland, adapting to cinema a major classic of the country's literature by Graciliano Ramos. Cinematography is spectacular and certainly this paramount Cinema Novo film inspired a later classic of Brazilian cinema: Cinema, aspirins and vultures. The footage shot with animals in Barren Lives is particularly impressive. Baleia is a charismatic character, being decisive on how much moving the film may be.
  • lso-soares4 February 2022
    Warning: Spoilers
    Directed by Nelson Pereira dos Santos and starring Átila Iório (Fabiano) and Maria Ribeiro (Sinhá Vitória).

    A film from the first phase of Cinema Novo, it is part of the sertão trilogy, along with Os Fuzis, by Ruy Guerra, and Deus e o Diabo na Terra do Sol, by Glauber Rocha.

    Adapted from the book of Graciliano Ramos by Nelson Pereira dos Santos.

    Shot in black and white, with purposefully saturated lighting, it was filmed entirely away from the studios, in the Alagoas cities of Minador do Negrão and Palmeira dos Índios. The pollution of these cities is thanked in the opening credits of the film. The open plans give the dimension of the drought that devastated the sertão.

    The plot takes place between the years 1940 and 1942, when we follow Fabiano, Sinhá Vitória, their two small children and the dog Baleia wandering through the dry hinterland looking for food, a place to live and work. They find a wattle and daub house, where they settle, with Fabiano working for the farmer who owns the land, as a cowboy. The couple's misery is so great that Vitória's dream is to have a leather bed like her old boss's, as they sleep on a pallet made with tree trunks, without a mattress. Fabiano doesn't know how to read or write, he earns little and still spends this little on card games. When the drought hits, with no prospect of rain, the farmer takes the cattle to other places, dispensing with Fabiano's work. The saga of looking for a new place will be faced again by the family, leaving, on foot, in search of their dreams.

    It's impressive how the chauvinism of the time the film was shot, and even in the time the plot takes place, is portrayed in the story. One scene impressed me a lot in this regard: Vitória went to fetch water from a stream that was almost dry, filled a huge ceramic container with very muddy water, and carried it home on her head. Upon arriving, Fabiano has an argument with her about his gambling, ending up saying that he works to earn money and she doesn't. And what the woman does most is working in the house, taking care of the children, making food, fetching water, taking care of the bills. Another scene that demonstrates how society lived in country side of Brazil is when it shows the contrast between the regulars at the bar, all men, and at the church, women praying, while the men stood at the entrance door. It clearly marks the boundaries of each gender in society. Before anyone thinks, this is a statement, but by no means am I canceling the film. It is very important for Brazilian cinematography. I really like this movie.

    Finally, the performance of the dog Baleia should always be highlighted, a masterpiece, especially in a scene of pure emotion when her fate is sealed by Fabiano.

    Even with saturated lighting, the photograph of the film's final scene conveys sadness and beauty at the same time.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This Brazilian film appears in the book 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die, I couldn't find a proper written review by critics, but it did get a positive rating, I was hoping for something worthwhile. Basically in the Northeast of Brazil, an impoverished family: the father Fabiano (Átila Iório), the mother Sinhá Vitória (Maria Ribeiro), and their two children and a dog called Baleia, wander the dry barren land, in search of better place for food, work and a home. They struggle to earn a living when they take a job for a wealthy rancher (Joffre Soares) overseeing the livestock, then they find an abandoned house which they move into. Their fortunes do begin to take an upward turn, but the father is duped into a card game with a crooked local policeman, soon an argument breaks out, and he ends up being beaten up by the cop. Despite being the victim of this injustice, the man believes in law in order, and makes no protest about the incident. Drought and misery force the man and his family to move on from the ranch and find elsewhere to earn their living. The film is very slow paced and has very little dialogue, the most memorable sequences are the family walking in the dry landscapes, I can't see it as the kind of film I would watch a second time, but I can see reasons why it is considered mentionable, all in all it is a fairly interesting drama. Worth watching, at least once!
  • Arid land, poverty, suffering, this is the visit here. The story is about a poor family who eke a miserable life in a homestead in the Brazilian wilderness, but this isn't about a story, it's going through the motions of life, embodying, suffering the hardship.

    I like here how it conveys the meaninglesssness, the limits of a world that goes on forever but offers so little to do. Drag your feet under the sun from here to there, pick up firewood, stir a thankless meal, herd bony cattle for the town rancher; a leather bed is their dream, denied until the end.

    I'll have you imagine the film like sheets with patterns of life stitched on them that someone hung out in the sun and forgot, the sun has bleached the patterns, the wind and dust have battered them to a lean rough texture, the film is their aimless flapping in the wind.

    So overall there's a godforsaken purity here that feels stumbled on to. This poses a dilemma. I can't watch something like this as aesthetic token when it involves the suffering of people, it wholly defeats the purpose. The question for me is how far or close is real life? Of course every shot has been staged, I'm talking about the registered perception; how much truth has seeped in with the dust?

    With Bela Tarr, see, we know, reality is the canvas of place on which cosmogonic abstractions are drawn with history as the brush, time as ink. With Rossellini, it's the stage on which a play is enacted, often about the pursuit of a real fulfillment, a real self. Herzog is about this dissonance between staged and real (so much more effectively than Godard), with jumps of madness that blur and edge to purity.

    Here it has all been so effectively bleached of difference. So I'm swept. But to a world I can only parch in. It works, in the end I can't wait to leave the place just like the characters who drag their feet away from there. As they do, the question on the children's parched lips is when will they finally become 'real people'? Meaning, in the context of this, that real life is a life of possibility, that lets you envision and create, look beyond suffering.
  • morrison-dylan-fan1 September 2019
    Warning: Spoilers
    During a discussion about recent viewings with fellow IMDber manfromplanetx, I got told about a Brazilian New Wave title he had recently seen. With the only area of Brazilian cinema I've seen being the unique Coffin Joe,I decided to find out where the barren lives.

    View on the film:

    Treading on the same scorched earth ground the family walk on in the opening shot, writer/directing auteur Nelson Pereira dos Santos takes the fluidity of New Wave camera movements,and for the Cinema Novo pans it towards the stark, documentary-style rawness of Neorealism. Keeping the dialogue in adapting Graciliano Ramos novel minimal, Santos brilliantly speaks the plight of the family visually, trekking the dry grounds round the crumbling family home with their cute pet dog in highly stylised fractured whip-pans,reflecting the family never having the chance to settle down to a comfortable life.

    Gathering round the family table, Santos pairs the eye-catching whip-pans with a intimate, rustic atmosphere of long takes taking in the daily, challenging routines of the family, backed by the delicate sound design from Geraldo Jose keeping the sound of Leonardo Alencar's score minimal, in exchange for the buzz,howls and tweets of nature filling the silent wilderness. Worn down to breaking point, Atila Lorio and Maria Ribeiro give outstanding, expressive performances as Fabiano and Sinha Vitoria, with Riberiro's Vitoria attempting to keep (how ever rough) the supportive side of the family unit intact, whilst Lorio has Fabiano's hopes finally left shot by the barren lives.
  • The only thing barren about Barren Lives is me who watched this movie in the middle of the desert. I'm really thirsty. If anyone could send me some water, it would be much appreciated.