User Reviews (14)

Add a Review

  • I bought Une Ravissante Idiote to get a chance to see Anthony Perkins speak French - while his accent sounds fairly Anglo-American, it's not too noticeable. Perkins is Harry Compton, a spy set out on a mission to steal some confidential papers from Sir Reginald Dumfrey. Harry's in love with Penelope Lightfeather, whom is coincidentally the seamstress for Dumfrey's wife. Penelope is the inspiration for the title The Ravishing Idiot, as she is not exactly bright. At all.

    Brigitte Bardot does a good job as Penelope, as she perfectly captures her aloofness and naiveté. However, she has this terribly strange laugh. That aside it's plain to see why Harry Compton is simply head over heels for Penelope, she's gorgeous and sweet - despite her lack of intelligence. He thinks to himself "She is an idiot, but you love her. You always wanted an English family. She is not English..."

    The humor in this film is odd, and just plain silly. But Anthony Perkins is absolutely delightful and charismatic, and the situations in this film are interesting. A nice film to see if you are fans of Bardot and Perkins who work well together (albeit not getting along off-screen), but otherwise I'm reluctant to recommend it to the latter.
  • This French film (English subtitles)is curiously lacking in depth, but I didn't hate it. Anthony Perkins is amusing, Brigitte Bardot is sweet and beautiful (as always) as the slightly simple-minded girl of Perkins' dreams.

    Strangely paced with varying acting styles, this mid-60's spy romp rolls along with no real purpose.

    A 5 out of 10. Best performance = Anthony Perkins. Even many of the words in the subtitles are spelled wrong. I haven't seen that too many times. Hard to REALLY recommend this, but if you're a BB fan or enjoy watching Perkins play a befuddled young man, you'll find something in this flick.
  • It was Tony Perkins 'second film with a French director :the first one was André Cayatte 's "le glaive et la balance"("two are guilty") , an unfairly trashed thriller;René Clément had previously directed him in 1958 ,but it was an American production in which he was dubbed for the French version;by 1964 ,his French had vastly improved ,he was fluent in Victor Hugo's language which he spoke with a very light accent .

    With the exception of "the matchmaker' it was also his first comedy : although anodyne ,it was certainly an act of self-renewal ,although the ghost of Norman Bates would follow him till his last breath (his last role " a demon in my view" is revealing)

    In the comedy field ,against all odds, Perkins reveals himself a very gifted actor ,and his perfect command of French helps .His pairing with France 's most famous sex symbol of all time proved successfull. BB was peerless when it came to playing naive bimbos, (apparently) dumb bubblehead girls (see also " Babette S'En Va-t-En Guerre" ,"Viva Maria" ) It's sometimes useful to pass for a ravishing idiot,particularly when your car carries a Russian spy dead body and you are subject to egregious gaffes.

    The screenplay is a spy thriller spoof ,with a far-fetched plot-though a warning reads :" this is based on a true story" ,before the cast and credits - ,it's sometimes hard to decipher the cock and bull screenplay (and the way BB sees it is riotously funny. As for Perkins,he is overtaken by events all the time ) .But I dare you to guess the final unexpected twist of this "avalanche project affair".

    Another stand-out is Helene Dieudonné's mamie, a granny who never loses her British upper lip -although ,like her granddaughter ,she's not British at all- even when her life is at stake !
  • "Une Ravissante Idiote" is the third comedy directed by Edouard Molinaro, who first directed shorts, then excellent Films Noirs. And for this comedy, Molinaro gets a great cast with Bardot and Perkins, it must have been a new experience, also shooting some scenes in London. Bardot and Perkins is nice couple, they work well together. But the script is not enough well written, some scenes are poor and some are brilliant, thanks to the speedy way of shooting by Molinaro, mostly in the slapstick scenes. It's a fine comedy, but should have been much better.
  • It needs to be said right off the bat that this is less than perfect, and while its faults are less prominent as the length draws on, they are the first facets of the picture to catch one's attention. Early exposition is rather inelegant, and I think the plot is genuinely more complicated than it needs to be; the extra layer of orchestration to the protagonist's mission makes the story a tad unwieldy. As if to emphasize the point, I read the premise for the film in a few different places and had a hard time making sense of what the contributor was trying to communicate, but it turns out it's not so much a problem with any user's literacy but a basic matter of trying to elucidate a needlessly overdone plot. Speaking of overdone, there's a lot of rather tawdry embellishment here at various points, be it footage that's sped up, cartoonish sound effects or music cues, exaggerated laughter (at least some instances of the latter being inserted in post-production), transitions or camerawork with an overly playful flourish, or a few gags that are absurd beyond the tone this otherwise carries itself with. This is a bit inconsistent generally where tone is concerned, adopting earnest, serious thriller airs at select times, significantly clashing with what is otherwise a frivolous, lighthearted romp. Setting aside the indelicacy of the outdated ableist language in the name of the feature, the character to whom that name refers is written a little inconsistently, too. And, dovetailing back into the construction of the narrative - even with all the cleverness that the movie can rightly claim through to the end, this feels longer than it is. Surely some of the writing could have been trimmed without meaningfully losing anything.

    All this is the bad news, or at least those issues that place distinct upper limits on how enjoyable this might be. The good news is that more than not 'Une ravissante idiote,' also known as 'Agent 38-24-36,' is sufficiently smart and entertaining that its value well outweighs its disadvantages; it's imperfect, but ultimately I definitely like it. In fairness, those notable convolutions of the writing are intentional, somewhat spoofing spy flicks; that this goes a smidgen overboard, well, that's the risk of such material. Broadly speaking the story is fun and engaging, and sharp scene writing carries most of the weight not just in communicating that story but more importantly, in providing the comedy. There's no single stroke of brilliance here, and the end result is more lightly amusing than robustly funny, but still the sight gags, situational humor, and witty dialogue are more than suitable to give us a good time. The cast sure seem to be having a ball with the silliness of the scenario, not least Grégoire Aslan, Hélène Dieudonné, and chief star Anthony Perkins; given more license to ham it up on account of how Penelope is written, Brigitte Bardot stands out even more. Elsewhere, even if I disagree with the choices that were made or pointedly think they detract from the whole, everyone behind the scenes turned in good work. Édouard Molinaro deftly manages a film with so many moving parts in his direction; Andréas Winding's cinematography is more shrewd and mindful than not. The costume design, hair, makeup, and sets are pretty fantastic, and though more sparing in this instance, any stunts and effects come off well.

    That 'Une ravissante idiote' is saddled with so many troubles is unfortunate, because they do serve to diminish the viewing experience in some measure. Be that as it may, it only wants its audience to have enjoy themselves, and though flawed, this is more than strong enough to achieve that goal. The plot could have been simplified a bit and impulses reined in, yet even as we see it the picture is a minor delight, and plentifully satisfying. I don't think there's any need to go out of your way for it, but if you do have the opportunity to watch, it's a decent way to spend a couple hours.
  • A charming espionage story, Anthony Perkins and Brigitte Bardot, Gregoire Aslan and Helene Dieudonne and the breeze of Cold War. Difficult to understand the nuances for the new generations but , in french recipe for comedy rules, a great chain of confusions, short tension moments, masks and apparences, naivety and some fights.

    A good slice from a lost world and the irony as tool against pressure of politic.
  • There is not only an idiot in this film - I mean Penelope 'Penny' Lightfeather, the character played by Brigitte Bardot - there is also an idiot, Harry Compton, alias Nicolas Sergheevich Miloukin, the character played by Anthony Perkins, much more idiotic than Penelope. All the other characters, absolutely all of them, are idiots. The film itself is idiotic, hard to follow, because nothing else happens, everything is related to a file, "Avalanche", locked in a safe. It is neither a spy movie nor a comedy, it is just a failure of huge proportions. The only attractive thing in the film is Brigitte Bardot, who, at 30 years old, looks super sexy. All the other actors, especially Anthony Perkins, are embarrassing. Returning to the ravishing woman in the film, Brigitte Bardot, as beautiful as she was young, as unfortunate she was in the roles she had in her films, most of them idiotic, both, the roles and the films. That's probably why she retired from the film industry so early, while she was still young and beautiful. One star only, for her beauty.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I expected a bit more from a movie with Brigitte Bardot and Anthony Perkins. They're both okay, but they just don't have much to do. The script lets them down at every opportunity. The Ravishing Idiot (or Agent 38-24-36) is the story of a bumbling spy played by Perkins. He enlists the aid of a dipsy Bardot to help him steal some secret plans. The comedy is, for the most part, lame. There are moments I enjoyed, but these scenes were too few and too far between. Anytime you rely on speeding up the film so the actors will move fast as a basis for comedy, you're in trouble. And The Ravishing Idiot uses this type of trick far too often.

    The Ravishing Idiot isn't the total waste of time I've made it out to be. There are a few scenes that were quite funny. The bit where Bardot and Perkins lose the plans over and over at the party was actually quite good. Also, it's interesting to see Perkins doing a film in French. I'm no expert, but I thought he did a good job.
  • planktonrules30 September 2011
    The films of Brigitte Bardot are, for the most part, a study in what might have been. What I mean is that although she was a gorgeous woman, she rarely was given much in the way of material in her films. Mostly, her films were like a steady diet of meringue--very sweet but not very satisfying if this is all you have to eat! It's a real shame, as she had a magnetic screen presence. Perhaps her having been given so many fluff roles is why she chose to retire so young--at only 39--and still an incredibly beautiful woman.

    "Agent 38-24-36" is bad even by the standards of a lot of these fluff films. It makes little sense, has VERY broad acting and writing and makes the least of its talented stars. Although the film is clearly filmed in Paris, the film is supposed to be about British spies in the UK. So what British actors did they pick to play in this film? None. Instead, the main British leading man is...Anthony Perkins! He seems about as British as John Wayne or Nipsy Russell. And the rest of the 'Brits' are all French men and women!

    This silly casting, however, is not the major problem with this dopey spy farce. The writing is pretty awful and some scenes make you cringe at their dopiness. Try watching Perkins in slapstick scenes like when he's chasing the dog in the restaurant or chasing a runaway vacuum (uggh--it's bad)! Dreadful is the word for this.

    The plot, if you care, is about a British attempt to pass off fake secrets to the Russians. But, Perkins and his girlfriend (Bardot) are just too stupid to get that right. None of it is the least bit interesting or engaging and the director did nothing to make anything out of the material--using stupid gags like speeding up the film (ha, ha) and having the characters behave as if they'd recently been lobotomized. Dull and a complete waste of talents.
  • Imagine yourself back in the cold war-period of half a century ago. Add to it your liking of the dry, tongue-in-cheek English humor, a little slapstick, and 'Une ravissante idiote' will entertain you well.

    Its story is about a Soviet spy circle in London, trying to steal a file with valuable military information from a vault. A paper file, to be precise, as personal computers do not exist back in 1964. Anthony Perkins is the spy circle's main tool to obtain it, Brigitte Bardot acting as his more than willing helper .... sorry folks, don't get any ideas: there is no nudity involved in this movie.

    All in all, 'Une ravissante idiote' gives us a well-built, consistent story, and fine acting from everbody involved. Both Perkins and Bardot do well in this light comedy.
  • The unique teaming of Bardot and Perkins had great potential. But the two of them had no chemistry. That can't be faked. Perkins showed some comedic talent and spoke French, unusual for a Yank actor. Somehow, the end result was a tedious, unfunny bore. As for Bibi, she would have fared better in a more action oriented spy flick along the lines of Our Man in Instanbul (Horst Bulcholz/Sylva Koscina). Perkins and Sophia Loren had some chemistry in the noirish Ten Miles To Midnight.
  • Arguably the worst Tony Perkins' film that he did prior to the 1980s, this "comedy" in which he plays a bumbling spy trying to retrieve a file for the Russians concerning NATO military tactics, with the help of Bardot, is neither funny nor interesting. Don't bother with it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    WARNING - SPOILERS ABOUT THE ENDING FOLLOW

    I can think of a simple way to make "The Ravishing Idiot" better: have the final twist (Bardot is actually a secret agent herself - and a capable one at that!) occur much earlier in the movie. Don't limit her to playing (quite well, it's true) the lovable ditz until the last 3 minutes, turn her smart sooner. As it is, we spend nearly the entire running time watching Perkins (whose character is not the brightest bulb either) and Bardot trying, and failing, to accomplish a mission that we know is pointless; the film is too long and there aren't enough laughs in it, although some of the visual gags do work. Also, given that "The Ravishing Idiot" was made in the liberated mid-1960s and that Bardot herself was at the prime of her sensuousness, it seems rather coy about showing "too much" of her - I'm not saying she had to be naked, but she didn't have to be covered up from head to toe for about 80% of the movie, either! ** out of 4.

    And a warning about the Region 2 DVD: the subtitling seems to have been done by well-intentioned amateurs, so it has a number of spelling mistakes, and it sometimes disappears far too quickly from the screen.
  • Beanamir8214 September 2005
    Warning: Spoilers
    I actually watched this for a French class, so I was getting the original dialogue, and not a translated English version. On that note, I didn't even know Anthony Perkins spoke French, much less acted in French movies, until I caught the advert for the film on TV5's website. I think about half of my joy actually came out of that--that and the fact that it's a French movie set in London. The rest of my eight stars come from the incredibly stupid and cheesy dialogue (which I loved), especially the scene in which Harry-Perkins' character-tells Penelope-Bardot's character-that he is a spy, and another man is, too, and that he has lied to her. She responds, "I love spies: they're tall, and handsome, and smart, like you!" After watching the Maxwell Smart sort of demeanor that Perkins gives off, that line made me laugh like crazy. The ending makes it even better, in retrospect. The reason I've got a spoiler tag on this comment is because of the particular scene I absolutely have to mention. Harry is, at one point, absolutely sure that Penelope's grandmother has been murdered; he runs to her house, and runs to the grandmother's room. He stops short at the door, horrified, as he sees a pair of feet sticking out from behind a corner. At this point, we know the grandmother's got to live, because she's witty and fun, and let's face it, this isn't a real spy film. The only thing I could think of during this scene was Norman Bates parading around the basement of the Bates Motel, with a butcher knife, his mother's dress, and a wig, screaming at the cops. I had to stop the movie to get a hold of myself. Any fan of Maxwell Smart would enjoy this movie--get the French version with English subtitles, and it will be all the better.