The story is a fairly absurd little farce that doesn't really go anywhere, but it's possible to enjoy this as just a goofy buddy comedy with some good, irreverent slapstick. Given the lack of subtitles on the copy I watched, you might want to brush up your French first; the dialogue is fast and idiomatic. I missed a good deal of it.
Add a Review
-
AndreiPavlov14 July 2008...But come on, it has Mr Funes in it. And as far as this comedian is engaged, it can't get wrong. I can't recall any movie with Mr Louis de Funes, which was not enjoyable. At least to my taste.
What is the place of this comedian in cinema? I am sure that he occupies a sky-rocketing place near Mr Charles Chaplin, Mr Buster Keaton, Mr Norman Wisdom, and Mr Benny Hill. He is the master of slapstick intelligent humour with a shade of theatrical quality.
Where am I? Oh yes, the film. It is a feast of stupidity. There are a few childish scenes involving "kick-boxing" and "judo". Mr Funes character is running about (as he usually does) for idiotic purposes. Some English-speaking guys are hunting a myth (i.e. a tattoo on human skin) and ready to pay huge amounts of dollars for that. The movie ends abruptly and incoherently. And did they have to throw the ministers into the ditch? But behind all that is the class of Mr Funes who never lets his character "go easy down the slope". He is electrifying and stylish. And that's what I like and respect him for.
Advice: take a good DVD copy (like me - with the original soundtrack and the subs in your native language) and if you like old-fashion slapstick you cannot be disappointed. There are better comedies with the comedian ("Fantomas" will perhaps be my all-time No.1) but this one is still good and very bright.
Turn off your brain and keep your eyes on Mr Funes and his grimaces - he is hilarious as ever.
7 out of 10. Thanks for attention. -
jéwé7 September 2015Le tatoué starts of with a lot of funny details and scenes but after about half an hour the pace drops. Lots of banter and outright crazy nonsense. Racist at times (it is hard to imagine this was considered bon ton in 1968), funny when De Funès is at his usual best. And the weird sensation at one moment when we clearly hear the soundtrack from the Pink Panther movies in the soundtrack. And the ending goes nowhere at all. It is difficult to imagine that 60s movie public was okay with this sort of plot less craziness that you expect 30 years earlier with Laurel and Hardy. A nice film for LdF fans, but when you are not: don't bother with it.
-
Charlot471 December 2012Enjoyable silly comedy about two obstreperous men who, after long battles full of verbal and physical humour, end up buddies.
In an artist's studio, rich Parisian art dealer Félicien Mézeray sees the old soldier Legrain, whose back has a tattoo by Modigliani. This he sells unseen to two American dealers and the rest of the film revolves around his frantic efforts to literally get the skin off the back of Legrain, who is in no hurry. The price Legrain wants is the renovation of his old family home in the country, which turns out to be the huge crumbling castle of Paluel in remote Périgord, while he turns out to be the last and extremely eccentric Count of Montignac.
Well photographed with an enjoyable score, the film is really about the interaction of the two stars. Mézeray is a greedy dealer, manic in his chase after this lucrative deal. Legrain/Montignac is cantankerous and erratic but wants his ancient pile restored.
The clowning could be enjoyed with the sound off but the dialogue needs some knowledge of contemporary French language and society. One little example which tickled me was when they are in bed together and Mézeray's wife answers him with "As you wish", naturally using the familiar "tu". He tells her she must stop using the familiar singular and must adopt the formal plural, because they are now a household of class. She replies "As you wish", using the formal "vous". -
ElMaruecan823 May 2017When a movie reunites the greatest and most iconic French actor: Jean Gabin and the funniest and most popular of the day: Louis de Funès, you expect fireworks of laughs resulting from the interactions between these two messieurs, but in the case of "The Tattoo", it's almost on the level of an armadillo's fart. There are a few funny moments popping up here and there, the film had a great visual look and a jazzy score, but its drought of gags makes it one of the least rewatchable De Funès movies again, there are some good scenes but hey, you can find them on Youtube and life is too precious to endure this, even for the sake of nostalgia.
That a film joining two monuments of cinema get so embarrassingly bad has at least one merit, it shows that a good premise doesn't make a good movie, success is never written in advance, and neither was the script actually, which I was surprised to learn was canceled because neither Gabin and De Funès liked it, so it was written on the job, with the shooting. Actually, it's almost a miracle that the film could be made, by the standards of its non-existing script, it is decent. It is even decent by the numbers, the film attracted more than three millions of viewers which is not the best score from Gabin or De Funès but it was still enough to belong to the Top 10 of 1968, it's like the top billing was already a guarantee of success.
So it's a case of empty-full glass, induced by a few guilty pleasures. As a matter of fact, the film gets slightly better near the end as you can feel the chemistry growing between the two characters and you enjoy the interactions rather than their importance to the plot, the restaurant scene doesn't add much but it happens to be the most memorable part along with the ice skating, but just when you end the film with the illusion that there was something between Gabin and De Funès, you learn that both didn't get along. Whatever it was, it might explain why this was their last collaboration, and why in the crucial scene where Gabin's character said he started to like De Funès', I couldn't buy it.
Gabin wasn't without a comical nature of his own and by overplaying the angry patriarch, he could even be a match for De Funès, but the actor who was known for his tantrums was actually the cooler one and it was difficult to see De Funès playing the supporting role, and it says a lot when his best scenes are without Gabin, one involving the two foreign businessmen and that inspired the IMDb picture of the actor, and a few interesting moments with his wife (who's not Claude Gensac anyway). The rest of the time, De Funès is begging Gabin to give him the tattoo and Gabin spends his time shouting and yelling and screaming, you could tell the pains the screenwriters had to fill the moments. There is a reason why this is not the first title to come to mind when you think of De Funes and Gabin's movies.
I'm just into a Gabin's phase and the more I appreciate the actor, the more I see how he and De Funès couldn't match, and I appreciate De Funès, too. They just have too larger-than-life personalities to share the screen in a complementary way, a "lite" version De Funès doesn't work, not when it's mixed with a red-bull version of Gabin. Other scenes are really awkward and according to director Denys de La Pattelière, it's only during the editing that they realized they weren't as good, some bizarre moments involving the African butler made me cringe because they were offensive without being funny, and even what could have been a funny little suspenseful moment was ruined by a rip-off of the Pink Panther theme, that was so outrageous, I hope it was meant as a homage.
There's no other thing to say, this is a film to watch on the basis that there are two great actors, for pure historical value, but that's all, both actors made better films, so don't waste your time with this one, the best scenes are on Youtube, and if the director, the writer, and the two main concerned ones didn't enjoy it, why should you? -
leplatypus29 December 2017I had this tape for a long time but delayed the review until the last moment as this FUFU movie is also a Gabin one. As much as Fufu is a true icon, I never liked Gabin and never understand why he sould be in French Pantheon: he is rustic, gruff, never smiling, one attitude fits all so well a real pain in the what you think. Maybe it's because the contrast is so huge that here Fufu really shines with his fallacious deals and really human defects. The movie also has Garvarentz as a music composer and his soundtrack is really swinging!
-
Kirpianuscus19 August 2017its virtue - the lead actors. the basic sin - the story. or, more exactly, the improvisation of a chaotic story who has the chance to ignore de Funes and Gabin for a sort of humor who is far to be the most inspired. but it remains a nice film for the small details, for the admirable effort of the actors, for the Exploration of a Jean Gabin who gives a not ordinary side of his art and for the genius of comedy of Louis de Funes .
-
udippel12 June 2020I do like both Gabin and Funès. Both together are pretty much a waste of time. Firstly, the plot is completely absurd, up to idiocy, at least with the two Americans. It still could be funny, would it not be the meet-up of two larger-than-life characters. They both work hard on keeping the other down. Just watched Funès 'Oscar' last night and was laughing with tears. The Tattoo has a bunch of funny scenes, but isn't funny throughout.
Just do something more worthwhile with your time.