Add a Review

  • "Take the Money and Run" is an absolutely hilarious Woody Allen film, done in a quasi-documentary style, about a career criminal, Virgil Starkwell, who has a very unsuccessful career. His prison breaks don't go as planned, his robberies are a disaster and usually coincide with someone else's robbery of the same place, and his planning of a job would be fine if only he weren't talking to an associate in a restaurant while the police are in the booth behind him. One nice perk of failure: while attempting to rob a young woman's purse, he falls in love with her (Janet Margolin). Virgil does admit at one point thinking of foregoing robbery and taking up a career in singing. He doesn't mention the cello, which gave him his start in music - and crime.

    This is one of those laugh out loud even when you're alone movies of which there are all too few. But this is one. Over a tough, FBI-type narration, we watch Virgil's futile attempts at making money through crime, see his parents (disguised) interviewed, as well as his wife and the various police and investigators he meets along the way.

    It's amazing to look at this film and then look at "Match Point" done 35 years later and see the evolution of this brilliant man. Woody Allen is capable of rock-solid comedy as well as provocative movie-making. Although he's had a few blips along the way, one wonders what he'll think of next.
  • TAKE THE MONEY AND RUN is Mel Brooks-like in structure and gags, but definitely Woody Allen at his comical best. Its not his greatest picture by any means, but perhaps the best of his early slapstick flicks (SLEEPER, BANANAS). "Virgil Starkwell" has a hard time stealing right from the start. When a criminal gets a gumball machine "stuck to his hand", you know he's in the wrong gig. Woody Allen is right at home with this innocent, documentary-style drip on the unintentional hilarity of 60's crime documentaries. Woody, or "Virgil", seems to be playing Woody as usual, something we all know runs through his entire body of work. This movie is very much like his innovative ZELIG of 1983, a black and white docu-spoof about a fictional chameleon.

    Jackson Beck's narration is PERFECT in making the outrageous material seem "serious". It no doubt inspired the short spoofs "Saturday Night Live" would go on to produce for years, investigative reporting seemingly important, yet ridiculous in content. "Virgil's" parents are in disguise (Groucho Marx nose and glasses) whenever they are "interviewed". The chain gang escape is one of the funniest sequences I have ever seen. Woody also moves into romantic territory with the beautiful Janet Margolin, who had a nice, fat purse for "Virgil" to steal, but also has a quick reaction to his inept robbery attempt and, of course, they fall in love. She is there for "Virgil" to live for during his always brief prison stays and to pick out his clothes for a robbery. There are some familiar elements here, most obviously the beautiful young girl falling for a middle-aged homely Woody.

    TAKE THE MONEY AND RUN is all about raw comedic filmmaking and mockery. It is not a situational film at all, just a bunch of perfectly cohesive episodes of this perfectly moronic bank robber, who spells gun G-U-B. Wouldn't that throw us all off if we were the bank tellers taking a note during a stick up ?
  • The clumsy Virgil Starkwell (Woody Allen) is bullied when he is a child. Then he decides to play cello, but without musical talent, the loser joins a street gang and ends in prison. When he escapes, he meets the laundry worker Louise (Janet Margolin) and lies to her, telling that he plays cello in the symphonic orchestra.

    He is arrested in a hold up and Louise finds him in prison. He breaks out and flees with Louise to another state. He tries to be honest but he is incapable to fit in any job. When he finally finds a job position suitable for his intellect, he is blackmailed by a colleague and returns to his criminal life. But his heists are disastrous and he always ends in prison.

    "Take the Money and Run" is the second film by Woody Allen in a documentary style the same way he does with "Zelig" in 1983, and tells the saga of a clumsy smalltime thief. The last time I had seen this film was on 22 August 1999 and this time I found it still enjoyable, but less than the last time.

    Virgil Starkwell is an incompetent loser obsessed with bank heists. The narrative and interviews in the documentary style of the 60's and 70's have hilarious moments and is closed by the funny interview of his neighbor that asks to the interviewer how an imbecile like Virgil could plan the heist of banks. My vote is seven.

    Title (Brazil): "Um Assaltante Bem Trapalhão" ("A Very Clumsy Thief")
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is Woody's first "real" movie and it's pretty good. Surprisingly so, in fact, when you consider the he began as a stand-up comic dealing out yoks that were by necessity strictly verbal. Some of the yoks here work -- "He told me was a gynecologist but he didn't speak no foreign languages" -- and some don't -- "The prisoners were served one hot meal a day, a bowl of steam." But the visual gags and Allen's physical performance more than make up for the jokes that flop. In fact the first joke in the movie is visual, and imaginative: Allen plays a cello in a marching band. Still, it's a first feature, and it shows. The camera is shakey and the photography not always first rate. He was to improve with practice. Here he has a scene in which he is having a private argument with his wife in the bedroom, but he's shackled to half a dozen escaped prisoners, who laugh at his entreaties and make wisecracks during the conversation. A similar scene in "Love and Death," with a promiscuous Diane Keaton holding the hand of her husband on his deathbed. The husband says something like, "I know you're pure and you've been faithful to me." The attending priests and doctors begin puffing and humming while trying to stifle their laughter. It isn't that the later scene is necessarily funnier, it simply takes it for granted that the audience can get in on the joke without being prompted.

    There are several discernible sources for the story. The most obvious is "I Was a Fugitive From a Chain Gang." Some of the scenes -- the breaking of ankle shackles with a heavy sledge hammer -- are repeated and played for laughs. I can't be sure that "Cool Hand Luke," which was released the year before, is an influence but it certainly seems so. There may be something of "Bonnie and Clyde" in it too.

    Woody hasn't got the great all-star cast that he was to assemble for his post-"Annie Hall" efforts, but what he has is pretty neat. The snarling James Anderson stands out as the Chain Gang Warden, in the Strother Martin role. What a face! Howard Storm as the hold-up victim/arresting officer is a familiar face and a welcome voice. Marcel Hilaire may not actually BE Fritz Lang but he ought to be! But aside from Allen, the most important role is that of Janet Margolin as his wife, Louise. Her talent as an actress was modest, although she could sometimes outdo herself, as, for instance, the sympathetic closet Jew in "Morituri," a dramatic part. Here she's no more than adequate, but she is so attractive that it hardly matters, and the role hardly calls for thespian fireworks. She was 26 when this was released. She was always pleasant, a strange, wistful combination of vulnerability and sex appeal, and some suggestion emanated from her performances that suggested she was that way offscreen as well. Her career and her life ended with a bad death at a relatively early age. Marvin Hamlisch's score is apt and easy to listen to.

    It's an amusing debut for Woody. You'll laugh out loud at it, unless you're a real sourpuss.
  • Now I'm rarely a man to agree with any 'consensus view' of particular films, yet I very much have to go along with the tide as regards 'Take the Money and Run' - only the second Allen film I have commented upon here, though I have seen many more.

    Basically, the film is enjoyable viewing throughout, but not an entirely consistent, successful comedy. Allen had yet to hone his skills in fashioning feature length films; I have reservations more so for 'Bananas', less so for 'Sleeper' and 'Love and Death'; the two films with which he really hits his stride. This is his first film as a director and thus maybe it is to be expected that we'll see a transitional film. One can tell Allen is trying to work out a formula to translate his largely verbal stand-up humour to film. He really does a pretty good job of this. There are plenty of very good jokes and a generally very lightweight, genial tone to this picture. It is seen through by this, yet is hamstrung by its very effervescence; the film is likeable and won me over, yet it is too scattershot in approach and delivery to really satisfy.

    Woody himself is an instantly winning figure in his comic persona; that of a physically diminutive and verbally bumbling Jewish intellectual. With in this film the vocation of a bank robber; a displacement which results in much of the expected amusement. There's not yet any attempt to go very deep into this character of his, but this is a pure, light comedy. No real New York or indeed Bergman or Chekhov reference points yet.

    One is reminded in Allen of David Thomson's insightful comments on Chaplin and the persona he projected to audiences; trying to charm them and win them over by a certain vulnerability and status as 'underdog'. It is very true that in many of Allen's films, like Chaplin, he is right at the centre of the film, and the world outside is not portrayed with any sense of the mechanics of reality. Conflicts are never all that serious or convincing; he draws from a limited pool of character types, in socio-political terms. Allen has done films with other leads; though his usual concerns always find their way through. 'Take the Money and Run' is full of the Chaplin tendency to have bullish, physically imposing figures, or indeed perhaps a wider society, threatening the 'little man'. There is a wish-fulfilment woman in the languid person of Janet Margolin's Louise; as a character more a projection than of flesh and blood or shades of grey. She works well as a slightly wan, attractive comic foil for Allen, who doesn't mind getting her hands dirty, but she's really not Diane Keaton.

    This film is slight, no question about that... it fails under real scrutiny, yet it is largely very enticing stuff; an early glimpse of Allen getting his filmic technique in order. If you like what the man does - and surely most (wryly bespectacled) film cineastes such as I do! - then you are sure to enjoy this film. Just don't count on it being a triumph in the major key.

    Rating:- *** 1/2/*****
  • For those of you who think that all Woody Allen's movies are vapid stories of neurotic rich New Yorkers, you need to see his early movies. "Take the Money and Run" is a good example. Allen plays Virgil Starkwell, an inept criminal. No matter what sort of crime he tries to pull off, something always goes wrong. Probably the funniest scene is when he tries to escape from jail like John Dillinger did. Other scenes include the time when the authorities use him in an experiment, with a silly result.

    Anyway, Woody Allen's old movies were really funny. The thing was that he created a bunch of outlandish premises and infused his New York Jewish humor. This is what comedy is all about!
  • This slightly uneven, but often hilarious, Woody Allen outing delivers the goods. There are some memorable bits, which are significant of his comic style. The one involving the chain gang, I'm sure, will always be remembered. Of course, some of the bits are too far-fetched and cartoonish to be funny, but Woody's routines often work and I can't lie that this movie is extremely fresh and original. I just watched it recently, and was laughing my head off, so I know it's not one of those outdated comedies.

    I've seen funnier Woody Allen movies, but I would still recommend it for all those who are curious of his early work--like I am. And for something that was made when he was still an up-and-coming filmmaker, it was done extremely well.

    My score: 7 (out of 10)
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Years before THIS IS SPINAL TAP, Woody Allen exploded into movie theatres with his outright, groundbreaking, zany mockumentary TAKE THE MONEY AND RUN which in its brief run presented the story of one hapless Virgil Starkwell, one of Allen's many anti-heroes, who entered into a life of crime but even then was considered inept to the nth level. In one of the movie's most hilarious moments (which itself is a nod to the type of cerebral Surrealism and cinema of the absurd which Bunuel championed), Starkwell tries to rob a bank in the most polite of ways, but none of the clerks can make up their minds if the word he's written is "gub" or "gum". (It's actually "gun.") They do, however, stage a contest in which people may vote for whom they prefer rob this bank. Woody Allen was asked by his producers to change the ending for TAKE THE MONEY AND RUN because it was deemed too bloody (it was, in fact, purportedly close to that of BONNIE AND CLYDE); hence, the ending that survives today. As a whole the movie is a classic of Allen's early wacky comedy and features Janet Margolin as Starkwell's wife and then-partner Louise Lasser in a small role.
  • Woody Allen's first outing as director, writer, and actor turns out to be a hilarious quip of a film that almost always steadily throws the laughs at you.

    Allen plays Virgil Starkwell, outcast. He didn't really fit in as a child, so he turned to a life of crime. But, as we see him now in his adult years, he has yet to commit a sucessful crime. As he's trying to steal purses in the park, he meets Louise (Janet Margolin), and the fall in love. This time, the love seems true because he isn't 60 years old and falling in love with her. In documentary style film, we find out about more of his escapedes.

    The documentary style didn't do anything for me in Zelig, but it worked here because it was more of a mockumentary. It had more "acting" scenes and less interviews. A lot of times, there was no narration, just like a "real" movie, and that added to the movie some. Allen's comedic style is one I adore, and this is no exception. He is very funny and his comedy is genuine and original. There's been too many "crime is glorious" movies, but this one made you actually feel for the criminal. That's no easy task.

    I hadn't heard of Janet Margolin before this, but she was pretty good as Allen's lover. However, a couple times it seemed like she tried too hard in the "dramatic" parts, but I can overlook that. Speaking of dramatic parts, there were a few too many lulls in the comedy, especially during the romantic collages, but those too can be overlooked if just the comedy is anaylzed.

    Allen's gags are not outrageous, not controversial or anything like that. Most of them are simple one-liners, though there are a good number of sight gags, most involving his crimes. One particually funny scene is when Allen and his gang are about to rob a bank, when another gang comes in, also wanting to rob the bank. It's a fun 86 minutes that will leave you giggling from beginning to end.

    My rating: 7/10

    Rated PG for brief language and criminal overtones.
  • In an age of tee hee funny blockbuster comedies, this is a FUNNY knee- slapping side-splitting tear-producing pause-the-DVD-so-as-to-not-miss-a-line-movie. Hollywood just does not make movies like this. It's a love story between a crook and a beautiful woman. No, it's the story of a little red headed kid who went on to pull off the worst bank heist ever. No, it's the story of a cons escape from prison. It's all of these. Only Woody could have had Virgil fall madly in love with Louise, want to spend the rest of his life with her, then only later on, decide he doesn't want to steal her purse. Classic. Only Woody would have his bank robber pull off a bank job with a mis-spelled note then have him escape from a chain gang on foot running beside men on bikes. Fantastic movie and fun for all. Prepare to laugh.
  • Take the Money and Run (1969) was Woody Allen's motion picture debut (sans 'Tiger Lily). The film follows the life of a criminal loser, shot in a faux documentary style. Allen used the most out of his small budget and made an amusing film. This was the beginning of his slapstick/farce phase that would last until the early 70's. An interesting start for one of America's most unique film-makers of that era. The script by Mickey Rose and Woody Allen is deeply engraved with screwball humor from their childhood icons such as the Marx Brothers and Charles Chaplin. This film showed the promise of a brilliant director who would become a major player in Hollywood in the years to come. Highly recommended.

    A.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Take the Money and Run" was the first film to be directed by Woody Allen. (I don't count "What's Up, Tiger Lily", which was made by recutting and redubbing a film directed by someone else, although Allen awarded himself a director's credit). It is an early example of a comical pseudo-documentary, a genre which later became known as a "mockumentary". Some have claimed it as the first feature film made in the genre; Allen said that he made the film in this style because the documentary format had hitherto been seen as inherently serious, "so you were immediately operating in an area where any little thing you did upset the seriousness and was thereby funny".

    The film tells the life story of a fictitious criminal named Virgil Starkwell. The joke is that Starkwell is notoriously inept and that his planned robberies always go hopelessly wrong, generally because of incompetence on his part, leading to him ending up in jail. Despite this, his story is narrated in the sort of portentous, ultra-serious tones that would be more appropriate to a biography of major-league villains like Al Capone or Bonnie and Clyde. As in a real documentary, narrative scenes are intercut with talking-head interviews with Starkwell himself and other people who have featured in his life, such as his wife Louise and his parents. (In a running joke his parents always wear a Groucho Marx disguise when being interviewed because they do not want to be identified as the parents of a criminal). Louise is played by the lovely Janet Margolin, often regarded around this time as one of Hollywood's "brightest new starlets", but who never quite seemed to achieve full-blown stardom.

    Woody was to return to the mockumentary form in "Zelig" and "Sweet and Lowdown". I must admit that I have never see "Zelig", but "Sweet and Lowdown" is one of Woody's best films of the nineties. It is not a pure comedy, but also a psychological study of considerable depth, with its hero (or anti-hero), the jazz musician Emmet Ray, emerging as a much more complex character than Starkwell, and showing that the mockumentary can also be used for serious purposes.

    Starkwell may not be a complex character, but he is nevertheless one with whom we can identify. He may be a career criminal, but he is also a loveable schmuck, the eternal "little man", who shows his softer side in his relationship with his wife and child. We cannot help sympathising with a man who tries to break out of jail with the aid of a surprisingly convincing imitation gun, painstakingly carved out of a block of soap, only for his exploit to be foiled when it rains, reducing his weapon to a mass of soapsuds. We can somehow identify with the hapless optimism with a man who, sentenced to eight hundred years in jail, hopes that with good behaviour he can get his sentence cut in half. "Take the Money and Run" is never going to be rated as Woody's greatest film, not when compared with "Sweet and Lowdown", let alone masterpieces like "Annie Hall" or "Manhattan", but it was nevertheless an auspicious start to his directing career. 7/10.
  • Wow, when I was young and very much secularist back when this came out, and for a couple of decades later, I found this movie hilarious and nothing offended me. I can't say that anymore as Allen's bias against religion, which he has made public many times over the years, hit me right in the gut in a number of scenes here.....ruining the fun of watching this anymore. Allen is quick to insert in this story that the misguided couple (he and actress Janet Margolin) are screwed up because their parents "beat religion into them." In case you didn't get that message, Allen repeats it several times!

    Otherwise, it's a funny movie that reminded me of the more modern Christopher Guest "mockumentaries" in which the film is supposed to look a documentary of sorts but is all fiction. Since this is a one-joke movie, Allen was smart in keeping it short at 80-some minutes because it starts to wear by the end.
  • Very early Woody Allen winner has the all-time lovable loser trying to make ends meet with girlfriend and future wife Janet Margolin. Allen, obviously pretty unskilled in most everything, decides that he can do just what the title of the film says and achieve true happiness with his one true love. Documentary-styled footage makes the picture unfold in a quietly uproarious way as Allen uses corny techniques used by most news organizations to tell a story that would have looked very odd without his insight being involved. Allen's films only work because he makes them work usually and that is definitely the case with "Take the Money and Run". Once again he shows unlimited potential and would use this movie, more than any other, as a spring-board for much future success in the 1970s, 1980s and beyond. 4 stars out of 5.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Take The Money And Run" is pretty funny (funniest gag, IMO: Woody and the switchblade), but it has the misfortune of being sandwiched, in Woody Allen's filmography, between two funnier - and even crazier - films: "What's Up, Tiger Lily?" and "Bananas". Just my opinion, of course, but I don't think "Take The Money And Run" has a comedy sequence as classic as "Woody in the courtroom" in "Bananas". Some people will argue for the (first) failed bank robbery sequence, but wouldn't it be more likely for Woody to misspell "Gun" as "Gum" instead of "Gub"? The film is also too long, even if it's relatively short, and in the last 15 minutes or so it has run out of steam. From an artistic point of view, Allen's biggest leap forward in this movie is the pseudo-documentary format, which is VERY effectively and caringly done, perfectly complimented by Jackson Beck's flawlessly deadpan narration. And Janet Margolin is one of the loveliest women you'll ever see. **1/2 out of 4.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is the first truly "Woody Allen" movie--directed and starring Allen himself. He had previously lent his, at the time, good name to some horrible projects such as CASINO ROYALE, WHAT'S UP TIGER LILY? And WHAT'S NEW PUSSYCAT? While I will be one of the first ones to say that many of the jokes fall flat, the ones that do are so funny and unusual that it's easy to forgive the movie's many short-comings. One of the stupidest and funniest parts of the film was how it was done semi-documentary-style and this parents appeared with "Groucho Glasses" (with fake nose, mustache, etc. And, when mom says "he was a good boy" and dad interrupts by saying he was "always bad--I knew he'd never amount to anything" it was a riot and was so much the opposite of what you'd expect to see in such a documentary. Other great moments include his becoming, temporarily, a Hessidic rabbi, the escaped chain gang sequence and the abortive bank robbery. Rarely have I laughed so hard--it's so funny and it's a shame this spark of raw humor was so seldom evident in his later films.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I'm more a fan of Woody Allen's movies such as Manhattan, Manhattan Murder Mystery, Crimes and Misdemeanors, but I still liked Take the Money and Run.

    I'd say that it has one of the funniest scenes in movie history! I really laughed out loud (before LOL was an internet invention) when Woody's character and his prison posse attempt an escape all shackled up. This is a masterpiece of acting, editing, and directing. This has to be screened to any acting masterclass. If drama is hard, then really comedy is harder. I wish they had more scenes like this in modern day movies.
  • Woody Allen hit gold with his second film, "Take the Money and Run", which is a basic film that works on so many levels and is memorable strictly for its charm and good wit.

    The story follows Allen's Virgil Starkwell, whose life is told in documentary fashion. We learn he had a strange childhood and turned to crime to fulfill his needs. We learn of his romance and sympathize with him as we engage in prison escapes and witness him put in a chain gang. The documentary style might prove to be a "gimmick" of sorts, but it works because had the story been told any other way it simply would not have worked.

    Also, "Take the Money" is an early token of what's to come and what the general audience will expect of Allen; smooth drama balanced by fast, witty monologues and lots of self-humiliation. To see this is to witness the early work of the director who ultimately brought us "Bananas", "Sleeper", "Manhattan", and the Oscar-winning "Annie Hall". And if anything, just track it for its over-the-top humor, not as in-your-face funny as "Sleeper" or as sexually hilarious as "Annie Hall", but it's warm and withdrawn, balanced all together by a very good ending (always one of the weaker parts in almost all of Allen's films).

    Highly recommended! ***+ (8.5/10)
  • faraaj-125 November 2006
    Take the Money and Run was Woody Allen's first film as star-writer-director and the start of a career pattern that saw classics like Manhattan, Hannah and Her Sisters, A Midsummer Nights Sex Comedy and Curse of the Jade Scorpion. Allen had partly written and had supporting roles in earlier comedies like What's New Pussycat? and the mess that was Casino Royale but this was his first complete film with him as director as well. He was initially skeptical about whether he could pull it off and suggested that Jerry Lewis direct him. In fact, you can see the influence of the more physical type of Jerry Lewis humor in this and much less of the Woody Allen dialog driven humor. There is almost no suggestion of the neurotic Jewish character that Allen later typecast himself in.

    Take the Money and Run is interesting viewing for all Woody Allen fans because this is where it all started. There are several funny gags as well. Woody Allens taste in women was good even at the start of his career. On the whole, the entire documentary style was an interesting approach, but there appear to be holes in the structure and in many ways this reminded me of one of Jerry Lewis's earliest films as a solo performer - The Bellboy. The similarity is in the concept of piecing together several funny skits, the whole being less than the sum of its parts.
  • I admire Woody Allen a lot. I admire his sense of humor and his way of telling stories. "Take the Money..." was made when Allen was in the beginning of his career as a filmmaker. This film is a comedy, but don't confuse it with an actual silly comedy (in other words: American Pie). This film is a good beginning for one of the greatest American filmmakers. Recently, I watched it with my sister. It wasn't boring, it wasn't stupid, it wasn't a fraud. I am one of the few Mexican's that knows Woody Allen (by disgrace), and I am happy when I watch one of his films. In my country, "Match Point" it's about to be at the cinemas, and I am anxious to watch it: Just three words for you, my dear Woody: keep on directing.
  • Take the Money and Run

    This was my favorite Woody when I was a young fella. I guess the rapid succession of quick little gags appealed to me. Now I'm less amused by it (perhaps partly due to overexposure) but there are some great bits. The whole "gub" thing is really inspired, and the chain gang scene, and some of the small throwaway jokes like the "disguises" Virgil's parents wear. Others fall kinda flat, but there's nothing truly awful in the entire movie. Although not one of the greats, it's generally a fun time.

    Rating: 7/10
  • Woody Allen has some misfires in this film and the documentary style might not always be perfect in this for a comedy (then again, it is a Woody Allen finding his legs, with his short story and other writings being the most prominent kind of humor. But (and a big but), there are various gags with Allen that are definitely some of the funniest from his early films. One involving him having to play cello in a marching band, another with a gag in jail, and his best scene, the "gub: stick-up scene which ranks among the funniest scenes not just for a Woody Allen film but possibly in just any modern comedy in the lengths it stretches to. Images like his parents in the sunny glasses and nose get-up is silly, but hard not to at least giggle at. And the sprinklings of the awkward Allen of countless other romantic comedies is present here, in a kind of amusing, rough-sketch form. So that's the thing with Allen's first movie, as long as you don't take it too seriously, it is quite memorable in the bits that do hit you.
  • Woody Allen's first Imovie is a slapstick comedy with a brilliant series of gags about a failed cello player who takes up a life of crime. Virgil Starkwell is being hunted by the FBI and the movie is a newsreel account consisting of side-splitting skits: Virgil escaping from prison using a bar of soap; trying to rob a bank as tellers argue over the meaning of his notes; chain gangs on the loose as everyone overlooks the obvious clanging of the chains. The clichés are endless and exaggerated to the point of hysteria. Interviews with his parents (in Groucho Marx disguises) are part of the narrative. We can see the style of humor that at the time was reminiscent of Mel Brooks. Interesting to compare these with his mature movies such as those set in Manhattan in the 1980's and later on, Crimes and Misdeameanors and Manhattan Murder Mystery, where the word play and script were dominant. Yet the early Woody Allen was a budding genius and very funny.
  • Another Woody Allen farce. This time it details the life of a born loser who begins to lead a life of crime but can't seem to do anything right.

    His parents, while interviewed, wear masks since they're ashamed of his son. Allen and the entire cast should have taken their advice and worn them as well.

    This film is Woody at his stupidest. Scenes include bank personnel discussing among themselves the note that Allen (Virgil) has handed a teller in order to rob another bank.

    Even the scene with the chain gang is ridiculous at best. Here is where the movie could have taken off but fails to do so. Robbing a bank only to meet up with several other robbers at the same time is handled poorly. No one really knows what's going on and maybe they're the better for it.

    Janet Margolin, an attractive beauty, plays Virgil's wife. She wants to know what color shirt he is wearing to the bank robbery.

    Louise Lasser comes in at the very end and acts like she is still Mary Hartman.
  • Take the Money and Run ranked rather high on the AFI's list of the 100 Funniest movies, which surprised me. Although it's got some hilarious bits of comedy (the bank robbery, of course, is the funniest bit), the humor seems a bit dated, on par with What's New Pussycat or Casino Royale as opposed to Bananas and Sleeper (his two early comedy classics, in my opinion). Janet Margolin (RIP) was a talented actress, but I didn't find her particularly funny in this movie. She was better in a brief role as one of Woody's high-strung ex-wives in Annie Hall. Louise Lasser and Diane Keaton were worthier (and funnier) replacements. A good bet for rainy day laughs, but not one of the funniest movies of all time.
An error has occured. Please try again.