User Reviews (18)

Add a Review

  • From the perspective of 2003, the saddest thing about this very downbeat picture is that it could never get made as a commercial production these days - certainly not with a middle-aged and far from beautiful character player in the lead. Although its structure relies on two large implausibilities, the story, characters and motivations are unashamedly adult and human: Zigzag takes life seriously, and when was the last mainstream picture you saw that did that?

    The versatile and sympathetic heavy George Kennedy (if I'm ever on a passenger plane that's in trouble, I'd want him at the controls) gives an honest, understated performance as a flawed family man who takes a desperate road to a strange kind of redemption. The way he does that would have made a terrific lower-depths 1940s noir for a second-division star like Dana Andrews or Edmond O'Brien, but Zigzag loses nothing from its setting in the less obviously cinematic milieu of respectable lower-middle-class life in an up-and-up America that was just beginning to turn Dayglo.

    I don't say it's a neglected classic - there's not the slightest touch of humour, the supporting cast aren't trying very hard, and the look of the film is reminiscent of an old episode of Kojak (so are most of the actors). Zigzag is just a solid piece of grown-up dramatic entertainment whose modest ambitions are positively Shakesperean compared to almost anything you could get insulted by at your local multiplex this weekend.
  • George Kennedy is an unusual actor for me. He is largely forgotten, yet has an Oscar to his name. He's in many of the films everyone remembers well, such as The Dirty Dozen, Airport and The Naked Gun, and yet he rarely catches the limelight as the leading man. He's also supremely talented, without ever appearing to be trying hard.

    In this superior thriller, he plays a man who discovers that he has a brain tumour. He arranges his own death, so that his wife can claim the insurance money. However, just as his plan is about to kick into action, he learns that he has been mis-diagnosed and that, in fact, he is not dying at all.

    This film stays one step ahead of the audience at all points. It is ingenious and interesting throughout, and has the added benefit of being a touch different to the majority of hard-boiled thrillers from this period. Perhaps it gets over-complex, and the downbeat ending is typical of the time. Nevertheless, this is a good film, and like some of the other user's who have reviewed it I am very baffled as to why it is unavailable on video.
  • George Kennedy plays what may well be his best performance as a man who frames himself for a crime he didn't commit so his wife can benefit from the reward money, and then becomes enmeshed in a complex and gripping spiral of events after he discovers he is not going to die after all. Anyone who enjoys thrillers will enjoy this film, and it is a mystery to me why it is not available in video.
  • This thriller had all but been forgotten until it was recently resurrected on Turner Classic Movies, where I finally got to watch it. It has a neat premise - a dying man decides to frame himself for a kidnapping/murder so that his wife will get the reward money... but complications happen. The movie is never boring, and George Kennedy and Eli Wallach both give solid performances. Also, there is an ending that you probably couldn't get away with in a Hollywood movie today. It's a good movie, though there are a few things holding it back from greatness. The direction and feel of the movie come across more like what you'd expect for a television show of the era. Also, the movie is a little slow. I am not demanding breakneck speed, but I think the movie could have been tightened a little. It's still worth seeing, and women may get some extra enjoyment out of it because Kennedy appears nude in one scene.
  • blanche-210 December 2011
    Warning: Spoilers
    "Zigzag" is a 1970 film that stars George Kennedy as Paul Kennedy, a dying man who frames himself for an unsolved murder/kidnapping so his family can benefit from the reward money. His doctor has suggested a risky operation, but Paul has refused. He comes up with an elaborate scheme to be accused of the murder and collect the reward money under another name.

    Just one problem - after he's arrested, he collapses and gets the surgery and is cured. Now in order to save himself from the chair, he actually has to solve the case.

    Anne Jackson plays Paul's loving wife, and Eli Wallach his lawyer. So it's a top cast that provides good acting performances all around. Kennedy is good as the quietly desperate Paul, and one really feels the love he has for his family.

    This is an okay film destroyed by the ending, which makes you feel like you've been sitting there watching it for NOTHING. The audience feels betrayed at the end.

    Watch it for an exercise in frustration.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    ***SPOILERS*** Heart thumping thriller with innocent man wanting to be convicted for a kidnap murder that he didn't commit Paul Camron, George Kennedy, getting himself convicted. That so he can have his wife Jean, Ann Jackson, and daughter, Elizabeth Colla, collect the reward money-$250,000.00- that's to be deposited in a dummy bank account in him, by putting Jean's maiden name on the account, having her,or the name on the account, turn him into the police. This hair brained plot is concocted by Camron when he found out that he had no more then six month to live in him suffering from a malignant brain tumor. An on top of all that his life insurance policy doesn't cover brain tumors!

    Camron planned the whole thing out so meticulously that no one for a moment not even his attorney Mario Gambritti, Eli Wallach, realized that he was framing himself for the murder kidnapping even though he steadfastly proclaimed his innocence in the entire matter! What really screwed Camron up was after being convicted for murder-one he fell into a coma and miracle of miracle's his brain tumor was successfully operated on! Now with a new lease on life and facing either life behind bars or the San Quentin gas chamber Camron has to break out of prison and prove his innocence! Something that he did everything to disprove when he thought he didn't have that long to live!

    On the run from the law and trying to prove that he in fact wasn't responsible for the kidnap murder of Pam Pacific Inc. CEO John Raymond, Robert Patten, that he in fact framed himself for Camron gets some good news from his good friend and night club owner Morris Bronson, William Marshall. Benson tells Camron that at the time the Raymond was supposedly kidnapped was at least three hours later then at first reported. That was in a kidnap ransom note sent to Pam Pacific Inc.by the person or persons who actually murdered Raymond to cover up their tracks. It was in getting a hold of the bogus ransom note that Camron fabricated his well planned out scenario in his murder of John Raymond! As things turned out one of Bronson's employees singer Muriel, Abigail Shelton, was actually shacked up in Raymond's hotel room up until 9:00 PM! That's almost three hours after he was reported, in the ransom note, to have been kidnapped!

    ***SPOILERS*** With Camron now being able to prove his innocence if he can get Muriel to talk he goes all out to find the person who really murdered Raymond! that takes him straight to hot and sexy Elanine Mercer, Pamala Murphy, in who's car a dark Mercedes Raymond was last seen alive! The big surprised in all this is that what lead to Raymond's murder was his womanizing not any sleazy deals that was thought to have him rubbed out! It was his fooling around and then dumping Elaine that spelled Raymond's doom! And it was Cameron who was so certain that he finally tracked down Raymond's murderer who ends up getting the surprise of his life when he found out, in him thinking it was Elaine, whom Raymond's killer really was!
  • The premise is familiar -- guy learns he's going to die, tries to find a way to leave his family provided for -- but it's presented in an interesting manner here, with Kennedy an appealing if unlikely lead. All goes well until the ending, which is so outrageously wrong for the movie that it completely sinks the film. A surprise ending is generally something many thrillers try for, but it has to be a surprise ending that satisfies the audience on some level, not one that throws the whole story back in their faces.
  • mls41826 November 2020
    Implausible, unsuspenseful, and just plain boring. If not for George Kennedy's near-nude scenes, This could have been a below average TV movie. Apparently, the producers felt that showing his bare rear end would be incentive to pay to see this in theaters. It really didn't do a thing for me.
  • rayarpt24 February 2006
    Warning: Spoilers
    I caught this movie in the theater when it came out. It kept me on the edge of my seat the entire movie. At the end I jumped up yelling "No, No, it can't end like this". I was not alone at being dumbstruck at the ending. With all the junk on video/DVD this movie deserves to be available on VHS/DVD. The character played by George Kennedy was almost crazed in his desire to provide money for his family after he died. No matter what he had to do, up to capital punishment, was not outside his moves. When it became apparent that he wasn't dying from a brain tumor, and all he could hope for was the reward money and his execution, his actions to prove his innocence appeared to suggest failure and success. The ending will knock the viewer silly.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    As a Los Angeles insurance investigator with a brain tumor (but unwilling to undergo the necessary laser surgery), George Kennedy bustles through this far-fetched, hyperbolic criminal nonsense like an overage Boy Scout. He proceeds to implicate himself in a year-old unsolved murder, which would allow spouse Anne Jackson to collect on the reward money; of course, the surgery becomes imperative--thereby leaving Kennedy a healthy, innocent man convicted of first-degree murder! Despite variable camera-work, and a somewhat confusing past-and-present style, this is a well-made picture with a solid cast. Kennedy, actually, has some fine early scenes; but once the plot loops become entangled, he has nothing to rely on but his typical slow-burn. John T. Kelley's screenplay changes gears in the final third (becoming standard cops-and-robbers stuff), releasing all the pent-up hot air within this scenario. It not only leaves questions unanswered, it also makes the L.A. police force look bad and the criminal justice system appear inept (which may have been intentional). ** from ****
  • SnoopyStyle17 November 2020
    4/10
    lost
    Paul Cameron (George Kennedy) is a new arrival in prison. He has terminal brain cancer. It turns out that he had framed himself for a crime he didn't commit to collect the $250k reward money for his family. His problem starts when he gets cured. He has to escape from prison and solve his own case.

    I got lost in his case and I don't who are any of these characters. I could barely follow the murder case and it ends in a wacky slow motion action-rama. I do like the general premise but it's told in a confused manner. The flashbacks only add to the issue. I'm so lost that I missed his cancer cure. This doesn't engage me and I lose track of the plot. I'm still willing to follow George Kennedy mainly for the actor. I'm lost.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Would Hitchcock have made something of this strained premise?..

    One hopes he would have avoided some of the silly staging (Kennedy escaping from his hospital room in a black suit but no shirt (( would the suit have been left in the room of a recovering prisoner under guard????))Via a freight elevator that is FULL of hospital staff...including a morgue attendant...who ignore this huge half dressed blond band-aided (after brain surgery)giant AS IF HE IS NOT THERE?!?! I was prepared by this scene for a later "twist" which had the central murder victim (in a flashback)willingly getting into "a car he knew"...with the film then contradicting this by having the person who the victim was supposedly expecting to be in the car scream that the car was not even hers at the time of the killing...

    I wont reveal who was in the car ...(just suffice to say that it was someone who the victim would not have been expecting a lift from...and that their presence makes the whole crime as illogical and unlikely as much of the rest of this film.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It seems that none of the reviewers to date have realized that the "twist" ending was the cleverest and best denouement possible. By occurring as it did, his wife got all he originally wanted her to get, and much more!! If it had not happened, although he would have been entitled to the reward money for discovering who the real murderer was, the latter paying for his crime, he would still have ended up in jail for serious public mischief by causing a false accusation to be laid and an expensive police investigation and jury trial to occur. It makes no difference that it was self-directed or directed against anyone else as far as the difficulties he caused may be concerned. In addition, the court might have fined him in an amount equal to or even more than the needless cost to the state. This would have eaten up most, if not all, of the reward money.

    However, because of the unexpected ending, his wife would be entitled to collect both on the double indemnity provision in his insurance policy and, as his heir, the full reward money as belonging to his estate. That's more than he had schemed for her.

    Beautiful!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I had never heard of Zig Zag before I noticed that it popped up on TCM. Although it was a theatrical film release, it has all the trappings of an early 70s TV movie production. It almost feels like a docudrama in parts and is replete with a jazz-like score which adds little to the suspense.

    The protagonist is Paul Cameron, an Insurance Investigator played straightforwardly and with little emotion by George Kennedy. When he discovers he has a brain tumor, he opts not to get surgery fearing that he might end up paralyzed. Instead he learns through researching his company's records, of the murder of businessmen John Raymond, the victim of a botched kidnapping in which the ransom money of $250,000 was never paid out. Instead the full ransom account is still being offered as a reward for the arrest and conviction of the individual responsible for killing Raymond.

    Cameron concocts a scheme in which he frames himself for the murder so that his wife can be the beneficiary of the reward money by creating a surreptitious savings account using her maiden name. The lugubrious first half of the film merely chronicles, in a series of flashbacks, how he went about planting the phony evidence as well as his imprisonment (before the credits roll, we're forced to sit through agonizing minutes in which the intricacies of the prison system are on full display).

    The husband/wife team of Eli Wallach and Anne Jackson figure prominently in the narrative, with Wallach cast as Cameron's feisty attorney, Mario Gambretti and Jackson as Cameron's wife Jean, who suffers throughout her husband's self-inflicted ordeal. There's more long-winded information imparted in the trial scene which basically regurgitates Cameron's scheme.

    The outcome of the trial is that Cameron is convicted. It's at this point where there's a welcome twist: Cameron passes out and undergoes successful brain surgery. Now facing a possible death sentence, Cameron makes an unlikely escape from the hospital while in police custody.

    Cameron's only hope is solving Raymond's murder on his own. The offer of the reward money apparently was rescinded and Cameron's wife could not collect on his life insurance policy either since he's now probably headed for the gas chamber. Aided by a bar owner Morris Bronson (William Marshall), he learns of a woman who went out with Raymond the night he was murdered. Cameron learns from this woman, that Raymond went out with another woman afterward, Elaine Mercer (Pamela Murphy), the daughter of one of Raymond's business associates.

    In a rather downbeat climax, Cameron meets Elaine after pretending to blackmail her, knowing full well that her father Adam (Walter Brooke) will be following her. Cameron intentionally gets physically rough with Elaine in a public place, which causes her father to shoot and kill him. Adam then in turn is gunned down by the police.

    The big reveal at the end is that the kidnapping plot was just a cover for a regular murder. Adam Mercer killed Raymond as he was enraged that Raymond would have an affair with his young daughter. By coaxing Adam to kill him, Cameron solves the murder of Raymond for the police, who are witnesses to his own murder by Adam Mercer. By doing so, his wife will now collect on his regular life insurance policy as well as the reward for solving Raymond's murder.

    Despite the clever twist, it takes so long to get there, that it's hardly worth the wait. Everything in this film is drawn out to the point that the overall pacing suffers immensely. Also it's difficult following the plot, especially understanding the relationships between the antagonists and their associates. With some more judicious editing and a stronger score, Zig Zag might have earned a few extra points in its overall rating.
  • TeenVamp7 November 2020
    This is currently on TCM and I tried hard but could only make it 30 minutes in. The directing and photography are the WORST I've ever seen. Do you enjoy extreme close ups of every single thing imaginable? Then maybe this movie is for you. Yes as several have mentioned You see Kennedy's ass and its totally unneeded. I do enjoy George Kennedy but he's best as a 2nd or 3rd character. He just can't carry a movie as a leading man.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    U.K. release title: False Witness.

    SYNOPSIS: When he discovers he is dying from an incurable brain tumor, an insurance investigator decides to frame himself for an unsolved murder.

    COMMENT: Probably the most successful example of a TV style transferred to the cinema, Richard A. Colla's "Zigzag" is unrelentingly shot throughout in extreme close-ups, yet, because of its strong story- line and forceful performances (particularly by George Kennedy and Eli Wallach), it manages to come across with an impact that the use of wider long shots often dissipates. Admittedly, the plot is full of holes, but the method adopted by the screenwriter to expose the mystery is clever and ingenious enough to keep interest at a high pitch.

    Despite her billing, Anne Jackson has a small, unrewarding, unmemorable role — catalytic but peripheral. It's a wonder (and a cause for joy) that the writer wasn't asked to expand her part by adding a few tedious domestic scenes for her! As it is, the script rightly focuses on the Kennedy character.

    As might be expected, the budget is tight, but production values benefit from some on-location lensing.
  • False witness is an intricate thriller that keeps you guessing all the way through.

    The plot unfolds beautifully and out of sequence.

    I really don't understand all the negativity about this film for it really is a good watch.

    Production values are top notch, as are the performances of the leading characters.

    False witness aka zig zag is an excellent thriller. Don't believe the negative reviews.
  • uscmd14 November 2020
    Unique, in that I can't recall seeing it elsewhere. Once into it, you develop empathy for the main characters. And suspicions arise for peripheral players.

    There are hundreds of lesser efforts on tv each week. If you are stuck for an interesting, "who done it," onr rainy night.......give it a try.