User Reviews (273)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    Watching Silent Running for the second time, many years later, I was amazed how different it was from my recollection. I remembered a story with a slight environmental message, cute robots that talked and a totally sympathetic lead character played slightly woodenly by Bruce Dern.

    Seen again, the green message ISN'T subtle, the robots DON'T talk, and far from wholly sympathetic, Dern plays a man suffering a complete nervous breakdown. Not only that, but it has an incongruous, jarring soundtrack by Joan Baez.

    So, it was a different film to how I'd remembered, but perhaps someway the better. Dern is far from wooden, and gives the performance of a lifetime. Even though this performance was overlooked for an Oscar nomination, it is still remarkable that the film was made at all. Can you imagine pitching this film to a Hollywood exec of the 90's?

    "There's this guy who's in his late thirties who looks after a forest in space. There's no love interest, instead the guy is lonely, a little nerdy, socially inept, and kills all his friends in cold blood. The remainder of the film hangs not on tension but on whether or not his plants whither. Oh, and some robots help him out, but they might be psychotic, too".

    As a result, Silent Running is utterly unique, and even if not judged as the best sf film ever made, it is certainly one of the most important.
  • Bruce Dern plays Freeman Lowell, a botanist and astronaut assigned to a spaceship that has the last of Earth's forests in enclosed domes attached to its exteriors. When the order comes from Earth to destroy the domes, and return to Earth, Freeman's fellow crewmen are ecstatic, but he is enraged at the order, thinking it wrongheaded and stupid, so he sets out to ignore the order, and save the domes, even if that means he has to take extreme measures with his crew mates...

    Sobering, thoughtful, well acted and directed(by Douglas Trumbull) ecological science fiction tale is really an allegory about humanity's treatment of nature, and what would happen if it was taken to its logical outcome. Though the extreme situation presented here is unlikely(I sincerely hope!) this film works because of its absolute sincerity, with three robots named Huey, Dewey, and Louie, who will play a key role by the film's deeply moving ending, which may bring a tear(s) to the eye.
  • Sometime in the future all the forests on Earth have been destroyed. The last forests are transported in giant greenhouses aboard space ships near the planet Saturn. Freeman Lowell, crew member of the space vessel Valley Forge, is an outsider and the only one who cares about what is left of our planet's nature. When orders reach their vessel to destroy the forests, he goes mad. He kills off the other crew members and starts a lonely odyssey...

    There's something to be learnt in this movie. More than 30 years old now, it stands the test of time with its message, as mankind is still working on what possibly could end in a scenario like this. Bruce Dern may be overacting in some scenes, but his character is still much more likeable than his crew comrades. Scenery and music are beautiful, fitting well to the dark, moving and unique story. And this is the movie that made "Star Wars" possible. Director Douglas Trumbull and other SFX masters like John Dykstra and Richard Yuricich were chosen to work on "Star Wars" because of the state-of-the-arts special effects they did for "Silent Running". In 1971, they were ahead of their time. In fact, they are easily as good as today's CGI effects, but much more memorable for their time. Even the droids that help Lowell are predecessors of the ones in "Star Wars"... A must-see movie for SF fans and everybody interested in Hollywood classics.
  • This film doesn't hit you over the head with million-dollar special effects. It doesn't contain action scenes every two seconds for the easily distracted. It just rips your heart out, and makes you think long after the movie is over. It is about isolation, alienation, lost causes, and the inevitable future. In short, it is a genuine science fiction film, not a gunfight covered with techno-glitz and special effects calling itself science fiction. Star Wars is great science fantasy, but the essence of science fiction is about what could happen, and is happening, and by the end of the film we have the disturbing feeling that it is a prediction of the future that will happen without intervention.

    The feelings of sadness and hope this film evokes are inextricably linked in this film, right up until the end. If you rent this movie, you will be haunted by its images long after you have forgotten other films.

    Ten out of ten stars; from the writing, directing and acting, right down to the three robot drones (Huey, Dewey and Louie), there is nothing to fault with in this film.
  • This is a fictional tale with worthwhile message about a botanist named Lowel(Bruce Dern) and his fighting into futuristic space station to keep a giant greenhouse. The large aircraft contains the last surviving forests and remnants of Earth. He receives the order from Earth to destroy the vegetation, then he efforts to preserve those plants and trees . Lowel confront against the remainder crew(Ron Rifkin, Jesse Vint and Cliff Potts). He's only accompanied by three robots drones which help him to preserve the greenhouses.

    This thoughtful movie packs ecological message, passionate natural conscience, glittering images and is quite entertaining. Outstanding acting by Bruce Dern as the nature-loving and rare member of the Valley Forge space station. Glimmer and colorful cinematography by Charles Wheeler. Sensitive and emotive songs by Joan Baez . Interesting screenplay by Steven Bochco and Michael Cimino. Marked directorial debut of FX whizz Douglas Trumbull who he also lavishly produced along with Michael Gruskoff. Douglas is a legendary visual effects pioneer along with John Dykstra and Richard Yuricich. He achieved several Academy Award nominations and won Award for his extraordinary contribution in this field. Trumbull is currently involved in the evolution of FX utilizing electronic cinematography and digital sets. He was the main crew of the special photographic effects for '2001, Space Odyssey' and supervisor for 'Close encounters in third phase, Andromeda strain and Blade Runner' and director of 'Brainstorm'. The motion picture will like to Sci-Fi buffs and people looking for message about back to nature movement of the 1960s. Rating : Above average, well worth watching.
  • In a future where all flora is extinct on Earth, an astronaut (Bruce Dern) is given orders to destroy the last of Earth's plant life being kept in a greenhouse on board a spacecraft.

    The biggest problem with this film is the music provided by Joan Baez. Maybe in 1972 this was cool, but today (2013) it comes off as obnoxious, and it pushes the film over the boundary from "environmentalist" to "hippie", which may be a serious turn-off for many viewers.

    Beyond that, great film with Bruce Dern being his wacky self. I love his little robot pals and how he trains them to be (almost) human. The actors inside the robots deserve a lot more credit than they probably get.
  • Universal Studios funded several low-budget productions in the early seventies. By far the best to come out of this program was 'Silent Running', an ecologically-minded 'message film' that stands out today as one of the truly great films of the science-fiction genre.

    Bruce Dern stars as Freeman Lowell, a futuristic Park Ranger minding Earth's last forests, sealed in gigantic domes aboard an equally gigantic freighter in space. When ordered to destroy the domes and return home, Lowell is forced to choose between his crewmates and his beloved forests.

    The motif of a polluted, or simply, homogenized Earth, the ultimate triumph of human progress over nature and wilderness, is a standard theme of science fiction in the 20th century, and the film is not too different from many other films and episodic television programs seen since the postwar period. Rarely, however, has the theme been explored from the point of view of ecological ethics. The storyline is kept deliberately simple, and asks not the question 'How Would You Act In Such A Position', it merely shows how one particular man might. The characters are given seminal, yet subtle opportunities to flesh themselves out (comments made during meals and card games are particularly noteworthy), and even if the character of Lowell is ultimately dislikeable, he remains oddly sympathetic. Dern produces a remarkable performance here, as a tortured, perhaps even mentally-ill, loner. His work here is still fresh and understated and certainly not of the over-the-top calibre, despite the insistances of some.

    The film possesses truly amazing visual images, from the spacecraft itself (the decommissioned and soon-to-be-scrapped aircraft carrier Valley Forge) to the domes (an aircraft hanger at Van Nuys Airport) to the unforgettable Drones, uncanny little robots designed around the amputee-actors that give them life. Visual effects are excellent, the direct prototypes of even more fantastical films to come. The music, composed for the film by Peter Schickele (known internationally as P.D.Q. Bach), is by turns boldly triumphant, softly mournful, and is quite effective; some viewers may hate the vocal work of Joan Baez, but she is a logical choice for this production and time period.

    While many films have suffered since the release of 'Star Wars'(which is NOT, strictly speaking, science-fiction) due to dated visuals and obsolete effects technology, 'Silent Running' is still startlingly clean and visionary. A worthy film for all science-fiction fans to see.
  • ... of things to come. Perhaps most notable isn't the destruction of earth's natural resources, we lost the planet some time ago, but the development of robots with human characters that are nearly with us now - whether people are aware that's what they are is still debatable.
  • I remember first seeing this film on television I think in 1973 and being mesmerized by it. Even though I found the the premise to be absurd (more on that below), the story and movie triumphs regardless. This is flim making at its most brilliant. With the exception of Terrence Malick's "Badlands," I cannot think of a finer directorial debut. It is one of the tragedies of contemporary cinema, that Douglas Trumbull could not find any work as a director for years afterwards. What a loss! The studio completely blew it.

    The movie. Yes, the premise is incoherent and it has to be dealt with. Sometime in the early years of the next century what is left of America's forests are gathered up and put on space freighters and shipped to . . . Saturn. Why is most unclear. Putting the forest domes in orbit around earth would have made perfect sense. Moreover, the film goes to great lengths to show that the robots are fully capable of tending to them alone so the whole bit about the unhappy human crew is unnecessary. But off to Saturn we go (where the light for the plants -- surprise -- is really bad).

    I understand that Trumbull was thinking of an alien contact story initially -- I am certain to be going out on a limb on this one -- which seemed to bear some resemblence to the Poul Anderson novella "Southern Cross." The aliens were soon dumped, however. What remained turned out to be an utterly compelling psychological drama of a man alone in space that is unlike any SF movie I have seen (it does bear some similarity to a few Twilight Zone episodes, however).

    This is an astonishing technical achievement in movie making. Everything about this film works: music, effects, photography, sets, acting, editing, direction, you name it. Folks, this was done for all of one million dollars and is a hundred times more compelling than films that cost a hundred times as much. This is art. This is literature. Get the DVD. Just sit down an watch it. This is a lovely, timeless, piece of work.

    Then weep because they don't make 'em like this anymore. .
  • '2001 A Space Oddysey' in unforgettable in many, many ways, one of them is the tripped out acidness of the landing on Jupiter. 'Silent Running' directed by '2001's special effects man takes it all the way. Beautiful music by Joan Baez, evil commercial interests with no regards of anything but money and loving for mother nature.

    Effectswise its not completely on par with '2001', but its still darn good. I prefer this style over the expensive CGI of today. Or maybe rather its the set designs thats better on '2001', probably both.. but this is not about the 1968 movie which had more money on its hands anyway. The droids in this kicks ass! Its a very sad story and a very lonely journey. Highly recommended!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Let me preface this review by saying that I believe our planet's ecosystems are priceless, and their loss to human activity is a tragedy beyond measure. I appreciate that "Silent Running" attempts to convey that message. But that doesn't change the fact that it is an abysmal film on almost every level, poorly acted, poorly written, and downright insulting to the intelligence of any viewer who finished the second grade and who has even the most basic grasp of human motivation and interaction. The problems begin with the premise- the Earth's natural environment has been degraded to the point that plants can no longer grow, so the last remaining samples of forest have been put under domes for preservation. So far, so good. And then these domes are mounted on several spacecraft, and sent out into orbit of Saturn. WHY? It doesn't take any understanding of science AT ALL to realize that if you can grow trees in a dome in space, you can sure as hell grow them in a dome on Earth, and for a lot less money. And money is what the conflict in the film is supposedly about- the spacecraft are given orders to destroy the domes, after only 8 years, and the ostensible reason is that maintaining them is too expensive, and they need the ships to "return to commercial service." Moreover, they aren't simply ejecting the domes into space, which would have been sufficient to destroy them- they're detonating them with nuclear explosives that were brought along for that exact purpose (we know this since each dome is equipped with a receptacle to hold the explosive charge). We're expected to believe that a government that invested in spacecraft to preserve the last vestiges of forest planned ahead by putting nuclear weapons on the ships, just in case they ever decided to destroy those forests in the most pointlessly wasteful way possible.

    Besides the illogical plot, "Silent Running" isn't even particularly entertaining. For most of it's running time, nothing happens- Freeman Lowell (Bruce Dern), the conservator in charge of the forests aboard the spaceship "Valley Forge", is for the most part, alone. He tends his garden or talks to his robots, or sulks and cries. His performance lacks any subtlety, every emotion and expression is exaggerated into a caricature, making it impossible to empathize with Lowell. He's alternately irritating and morally reprehensible, but never identifiable.

    The soundtrack, while mostly unnoticeable, features a couple of original folk songs by Joan Baez that are the most sickly-sweet, stereotypical, tree-hugging hippy claptrap you will ever hear- and this is from someone who LIKES folk music. These songs clash completely with the tone of the film, and yank you right out of the experience.

    ---PLOT SPOILERS FROM HERE ON---

    Back to the plot. Everyone on board the "Valley Forge", with the exception of Lowell thinks that the entire enterprise is a waste of time, and wants nothing better than to ditch the forests and go home. They show the project and Lowell no respect, crushing his vegetable garden under their high speed cargo transport vehicles, which they race around the ship in like go-carts. Lowell himself is clearly unhinged from the beginning, ranting at his crewmates about the beauty of the trees and the flowers, and the apathy and destructiveness of man with a mad look in his eyes. That any supervisor would be stupid enough to put these people together in a confined space, in charge of an important mission, for an extended period of time is absolutely incredible.

    When the order to destroy the domes comes in, Lowell's response is predictable- before they can finish, he murders his crewmates, trapping several of them in one of the forest domes and destroying it, going against his motivation. He pretends that the ship has suffered damage and alters it's course, trying to hide from the other ships in the shadow of Saturn. The captain of one of the other ships warns him that the Valley Forge's trajectory will carry it into Saturn's ring, which will probably destroy it, and gives him the time when this will occur. But Lowell doesn't even attempt to change course, risking the safety of the last forest which his ship is carrying. And he neglects to bring the ship's maintenance robots (to whom he is emotionally attached) inside before the ship before it hits the ring, resulting in one of them being destroyed.

    Despite being a professional conservator, Lowell fails to realize that plants NEEDS LIGHT TO SURVIVE, and that moving the ship into Saturn's shadow starts to kill the forest. When the plants start dying he examines the leaves under a microscope and exclaims "I just don't understand it. I've looked at everything, and I just don't understand it." When he realizes his error, he just sets up sun lamps to restore the trees to health- which makes his earlier oversight even more glaring, since there were already lights mounted inside the dome, they simply weren't enough without the sun.

    Depressed and desperate to prevent the other ships from capturing the last dome, Lowell reprograms one of the robots to maintain the forest, ejects the dome, and then destroys the Valley Forge. But if the forest dome could be maintained indefinitely with a few lights and a robot on board, then there was no reason for humans to be out there in the first place, costing the government money. Even if the humans did a better job, when funding ran out they could have simply left the domes with robot attendants rather than destroying them. The entire plot is pointless. In the end, the last forest is still doomed since no one knows it's there. Eventually the robot will break down, the lights will burn out, the power will fail, or a rock will puncture the dome. Ultimately, Lowell accomplishes nothing. Neither does the film.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I've referred to several classic science fiction films as "the thinking man's science fiction film", and while this is certainly one of those, it's also the quiet man's science fiction films. It's obvious that Bruce Dern here would not be a hero on earth, but the simple values that his character has over his love for nature is truly worth applauding him for. What's questionable is his fury over fellow astronauts who continuously defy him by driving around on little space vehicles, crushing the foliage and frightening the garden type animals who get to live among the flora and fauna, the flowers and leafy greens. It's a shocking turn of events from a seemingly peaceful man, but when he finds out that their huge space city (population four) is being sent back to a now plant free earth, he can't help but go ballistic.

    While Cliff Potts and the other two men only have limited screen time, it's anti-establishment hero Dern who dominates the film with long scenes of doing nothing but talking to either himself or the teeny tiny robots who parade around the ship. They would get off the path automatically if the other men were zooming down the spaceship roads, but with Dern, they seem to individually gain personalities. The destruction of one of them truly is sad. There really is nothing as far as special effects are concerned, even though director Douglas Trumball was the special effects man on "2001". The mixture of sweetness and cynicism is an interesting combination, and the songs by Joan Baez really thought provoking.
  • One of the streams I love most in cinema are Sci-Fi/horror stories from the 70s dealing with either ecological, dystopian or misanthropy themes. Or better yet, a combo of all three together! For this reason, "Silent Running" stood on my must-see list since many years, and I felt quite convinced I would adore it as much as other contemporary classics like "Soylent Green", "Z.P.G." or "Logan's Run". It is indeed a wondrously unique and powerful Sci-Fi fable, and particularly the first half hour I gazed at the screen with pure astonishment in all my facial expressions. The beginning is so incredibly good, with close-up and detailed images of simple nature footage (for example a snail crawling over a leaf) to the tunes of Joan Baez' mind-penetrating ecological protest music & lyrics. Only when the film's credits are finished, the camera zooms out and the viewer realizes all this beautiful fauna & flora is contained within the borders of a huge artificial dome, floating around in space. One man, with the help of a bizarrely cute miniature robot, is lovingly looking after the trees and plants, but suddenly the peaceful tableau is rudely interrupted by two other men childishly racing against each other with motorized go-karts and destroying the crops.

    With this, the tone for the film is set. Freeman Lowell, the calm and introvert horticulturist, is the good guy. The other astronauts (Cliff Potts, Jesse Vint, Ron Rifkin) are the ruthless minions that blindly follow the orders from an unseen government, speaking from an earth that is largely devastated by nuclear warfare and disasters. When the unthinkable command is given to destroy all the greenery that they looked after for 8 years, only Lowell revolts and undertakes extreme measure to safeguard the last remaining forest.

    As soon as the other crew members are out of the picture, "Silent Running" admittedly becomes much less of a captivating Sci-Fi adventure. As much as I hate to confess it, there honestly isn't a lot happening here, apart from Lowell humanizing his androids (aptly baptizing them Huey, Dewey and - in memoriam - Louie) and philosophizing by himself. "Silent Running" somewhat bounces back and forth between John Carpenter's "Dark Star" and Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" (for which director Trumbull was the special effects supervisor). The former is ultra-low budgeted and heavily plays on parody, whereas the latter is massively expensive and exaggeratedly perfectionist. "Silent Running" is in the middle. Not as cheap as "Dark Star", but only one-tenth as expensive as "2001", and since Trumbull is an effects-wizard, it's plainly clear to see where most of the budget went. The director also tries to narrate the story straightforward and emotionlessly. In the end, you don't feel too much empathy for Lowell, but I don't think you were supposed to.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Abysmal. Not much in the way of intrigue, plot twists, conspiracy theories, or even a plot that makes any kind of rational sense. As another reviewer posted elsewhere, the movie has the pace of 2001 without the quality. I can see how they tried to make a socially conscious movie, but it failed. The Joan Baez music was horrendous however the visual effects were fairly good for being 1971.

    From the plot outline, Bruce Dern along with several other ships are told to nuke all the forests that are aboard ships in space. American Airlines and Dow chemical must have paid for a large portion of this movie as their logos are everywhere. The movie missed its message though. The message was lost in horrible acting and a storyline that has so many missing pieces that are necessary to the flow of the film. The movie is irrational, Bruce Dern performs a soliloquy for much of the movie (if you omit him talking to robots), Dern is filmed for much of the movie caring for bunnies and hawks that somehow don't kill the bunnies, and much more. Save your time and watch grass grow.

    ***SPOILER ALERT!!*** OK, as someone else posted as well, what botanist doesn't realize that the forest is dying because of a lack of sun? How in the name of the Flying Spaghetti Monster can the earth maintain any life with the entire planet at 75 degrees? Where are the animals on the planet that maintain the food chain if all the fields and forests are gone? There are a slew of others as well. The plot had almost no thought put into it other than conveying the one message: "Dont kill trees, we need trees!"
  • Recently someone asked me what was the best sci-fi movie I'd ever seen. "Best"? On what basis -- story, acting, special effects? Generally one would usually choose one of the high-tech, high-priced, superstar biggies.

    But I had to say "Silent Running." Oh, it has special effects all right, and I think they're good enough for the purpose; I certainly felt the cramped dimness of the station against the vast implacability of space. Maybe you'd say it doesn't have enough action, surprises, or gore. But maybe this story doesn't need them.

    Then why is it my nomination? Because when it was over, I had to turn off the TV -- couldn't let its mood and memory be violated by a late-nite commercial -- and just quietly weep for its poignancy. Anything less (or more) would have denied it the respect it deserved.

    If you must, watch it as just more fodder for your entertainment urge. But if your soul is deeper than that... if you can, as Bruce Dern does, put yourself in the place of a character who so cares about the earth and its place in the cosmos ... you'll appreciate the eloquent statement of this film and the way it's presented.

    A man, not a god. But if it were you, if you were there... would you, COULD YOU do what he did?
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is a worthy film in many ways, and it has a good message behind it. It carries more of an emotional impact that most science fiction films. The irony of the drones being better "human beings" than Freeman Lowell's crewmates is exquisite, and their interaction with Lowell when he is alone is fascinating. Adding songs to the film was a nice humanistic touch... I just wish someone other than Joan Baez had been chosen. Douglas Trumbull's decision to film the interiors in the decommissioned aircraft carrier Valley Forge adds an element of realism rarely seen.

    My understanding is that in "2001", the original plan was to send the astronauts to Saturn, but Trumbull's special effects team could not create a convincing Saturn with the time they had, so they went for Jupiter. I have heard that showing the world he could "do Saturn" was one motivation for making Silent Running. He did a great job... but...

    *** Spoiler starts here ***

    The science fiction fan in me has to ask: why were the ark ships in orbit around Saturn to begin with? Sending ships of that size to Saturn would be enormously expensive (trillions of dollars and decades for design/construction/testing and the voyage itself). It would make far more sense to keep them in Earth orbit. This ties in with the reason the forest is dying--it's too far away from the sun. (For a back-to-nature guy, it takes Bruce Dern a very long time to realize this.) But if the ark ships are in Earth orbit, you don't get to show off your Saturn special effects. And you can rotate the crews instead of stranding them two billion+ miles from Earth, which is a surefire recipe to make people crazy.

    I am sure my comments strike some folks as unnecessarily picky. But this movie was advertised as science fiction, and the science in a science fiction story has to make sense. (Note the triple appearance of the word "science" in the last sentence.) A good science fiction film, of which there are very few, should have an internally logical story--the special effects should enhance the story, not drive the plot. Trumbull would have been far better off enlisting the aid of his old boss's writing partner, Arthur C. Clarke, who co-created one of the great science fiction films.

    Aside from the holes in the story logic, I rated this film highly, because it does pose important questions, and aspires to be something more than the usual space opera.
  • Bruce Dern plays Freeman Lowell, one of four young botanists in the not too distant future, who has undertaken an assignment of caring for what's left of Earth's forests and vegetation. At a time where nothing grows on our home planet anymore and people no longer care about the trees, the plants, the birds and other wildlife, it's the job of Lowell and his cohorts to man a spaceship which contains several giant domed globes securing the world's last surviving forests, at least for the time being. This is a story of what happens when chief orders are issued for the astronauts to abandon their mission, return home to Earth, but to first blow up all of the forests. Dern is the only dedicated member of the crew who will do whatever it takes to defy his orders and save nature from man's destruction, no matter what the cost.

    This is a good science fiction tale with a message, and this is brought home by two Joan Baez environmental songs which she sings over the soundtrack. Bruce Dern is ideally cast as the well-meaning naturist who finds that his only true friends aboard his spacecraft are his three small assisting drones whom he affectionately christens Huey, Dewey, and Louie. These miniature robots were acted by real-life amputee actors without legs, who were placed inside the shells of these automatons, and who walked on their hands to bring them to life. Young first-time director Douglas Trumbull was also the special effects maestro who worked on Kubrick's classic 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, and he referred to SILENT RUNNING as "my first student project". It's a great testimony to his talent that this film turned out as well as it did, even though today it plays more like a simple yet high-spirited telefilm. *** out of ****
  • My title might sound like a joke, but the philosophy is provocative, puzzling and profoundly poignant. It's this Zen question that we explore in "Silent Running", a film that was way ahead of its time and still is, on many levels. Or as lead actor Bruce Dern said in a recent interview: "It'll continue to be relevant until somebody cleans this place up, and no one has done that yet."

    Plot summary: Some time in the "next millennium" (i.e. THIS millennium for those keeping time), humans have ruined the planet to the point that all of earth's forests, wildlife and cute bunnies are reduced to a handful of habitats kept alive in orbital biodomes, more of a curiosity--or as we learn, a nuisance--than anything else. Our hero "Lowell" (Bruce Dern) is among a team of glorified warehouse workers keeping the domes operational. Then one day the management announces without explanation that it's time to close shop, jettison Earth's last forests, nuke them, and terminate the mission. Everyone is selfishly overjoyed at ending their long shift in space, but Lowell decides to... shall we say... resist.

    It's a fabulous premise which is very lucidly and realistically presented, even though cynics may have dismissed it as a fantasy "eco-thriller" alongside other great 70s films like "The China Syndrome", "The Andromeda Strain", "Logan's Run" and even "Planet of the Apes". But for my money, "Silent Running" hits closest to home because the story is chillingly practical. It's a very minimalistic film, forsaking the heart pounding action of the aforementioned films for a quieter, more claustrophobic & personal story of 1 human engaged in silent running (the submarine practice of playing dead in order to throw pursuers off the trail). Here we get basically 90 minutes of Bruce Dern talking to himself and to inanimate objects in essentially 1 long, passionate monologue that will burn itself into your brain.

    32 DAYS, A SHOESTRING BUDGET & AN ABANDONED AIRCRAFT CARRIER

    is all it took. Well, that plus a load of creativity and a labor of love. Directed by Douglas Trumbull who did the special effects for "2001 A Space Odyssey", "Close Encounters" and "Blade Runner" but no film directing prior to this, this movie was part of a financial experiment by Universal Studios: give 5 young filmmakers a tiny amount of money each ($1 million - not even 1/10th the budget of Star Wars) and let them do whatever they wanted, without studio interference or oversight, as long as they stayed under budget. The 4 other films in this experimental group were George Lucas's "American Graffiti", Peter Fonda's "The Hired Hand", Dennis Hopper's "Last Movie", and Milos Forman's "Taking Off". Personally I think "Silent Running" was the best of the crop, certainly the most ambitious, and alongside the others it proved the experiment an artistic success (though a commercial meh).

    As you're watching this movie you'll be blown away by the enormous sets and staging, undoubtedly the most authentic spaceship interiors we've ever seen because guess what, it wasn't fake. The space station "Valley Forge" shown in the movie was actually the abandoned aircraft carrier "Valley Forge" which Trumbull rented for a paltry $2000/week. (Seriously! Imagine for the cost of renting a nice beach house you can vacation on a freakin aircraft carrier). And the whole thing was shot with just 1 or 2 takes for each scene to save on film, processing & time. That meant Bruce Dern had to get his acting right, the camera had to capture all the action, and the cinematography had to work like a charm which it apparently did because I couldn't find a single flaw. 32 days of shooting, with virtually zero post production is all it took. And last but not least we have the incredible "robotics" which you will never forget...

    Actually wait. I don't want to ruin it for you, so I won't tell you how they did the adorable robots Huey, Dewey and Louie. I'll just say the whole time I was watching the movie, I was bouncing between the powerfully sentimental charm of these characters vs utter confoundment at how they created such realistic mechanical lifeforms that look like television sets propped up on penguin flippers. Trumbull's vision of technology was not supposed to be sterile and lifeless, as with every robot in scifi history up to that point, but he wanted to create something instantly personable without looking anything like a human. He succeeded brilliantly, and the robots in this film directly inspired a new face of robotics in cinema such as R2D2 in Star Wars. I leave you with the mystery of how Trumbull & his crew pulled it off. Google the answer after the movie ends.

    Innovative designs and cinematic creativity aside, this story is just plan powerful. If you have kids, please show this to them immediately. Or if you're a grownup who still has the idealism of a child, then pop yourself a huge bowl of organic popcorn (avoid that synthetic butter sludge) and settle in for a life altering experience. This is the kind of film that keeps dreamers alive in our increasingly terrifying technological swamp. Whether you're a tree hugger or just someone who can appreciate the beauty of things that most people disregard, as well as the importance of fighting to preserve these things, "Silent Running" will leave you speechless.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    SILENT RUNNING is one of those 'lonely' sci-fi films made in the spirit of 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY where it's all about astronauts being isolated and becoming gradually unhinged in deep space. Bruce Dern stars as an interstellar gardener (!) tasked with caring for a greenhouse full of the Earth's last plant life.

    The film that gradually unfolds (at a slow and stately pace) is both watchable and slightly twee. There's a message about ecological conservation that's being shoved down the viewer's throat all the time which I didn't care much for, but Bruce Dern makes up for that by fully inhabiting his character's role. The best thing about the film? Those quirky robots, which are nothing like robots in real life but which add humour and a touch of pathos in any case.

    SILENT RUNNING is considered by some to be a masterpiece, but I don't buy it; there just isn't enough substance to go along with all the effects and the heavy-handed message. It is, however, a perfectly watchable movie, albeit one I'm in no hurry to revisit anytime soon.
  • "Silent Running" is an appealing, unusual sci-fi tale set in deep space. Bruce Dern plays astronaut Freeman Lowell, who's been working on a project for the past eight years: maintain the last of the flora and fauna scavenged from a devastated Planet Earth, inside huge geodesic domes. One day he gets the orders from his bosses to terminate the project and head home. Unfortunately, this idea doesn't appeal to Freeman, and he mutinies.

    The film is not subtle about its love-and-respect-for-Mother-Nature, "save the planet" mentality, but it's quite an affecting story no matter what. Lowell does some things one can't exactly condone, but you do understand the man. Thanks to a powerhouse performance by Mr. Dern, you can still sympathize with the man and be moved by his loneliness and social awkwardness. True enough that a story like this would seem like a pretty hard sell to studios, even 43 years ago, since there are no female characters and the main person isn't all that noble.

    Special effects veteran Douglas Trumbull, renowned for his work on "2001: A Space Odyssey", obviously has a real affinity for creating interesting environments and striking visuals. He uses these visuals just as much as any dialogue in telling the story, which is a pretty entertaining one; it was scripted by Deric Washburn, Michael Cimino, and Steven Bochko. The effects are nicely done, and those robot characters - referred to here as drones - do have some personality, and are highly endearing, if not as memorable as, say, R2-D2 from "Star Wars".

    The songs, by Joan Baez, and score, composed and conducted by Peter Schickele, are lovely.

    Cliff Potts, Ron Rifkin, and Jesse Vint are all fun as Lowells' younger, more carefree associates, but after a while only Dern remains as the sole human presence on screen. His performance has to rank as one of his all time best.

    Overall, watching this one is a fairly potent experience, and it does stick with you once it's over.

    Eight out of 10.
  • Yet another guilty pleasure from the Seventies, though when I view it today I am more inclined to recall the feelings I'd had in my in-theater introduction.

    Even then I'd recognized Doug Trumbull from "2001", so I very much looked forward to his directorial debut. From his caterpillar's-eye view behind the opening credits to the claustrophobic interiors to the closing very long pullback he did not disappoint. (The end credits should remind you of Close Encounters of the Third Kind, on which Trumbull also participated.)

    Later viewings and readings revealed the production design and FX were a triumph of innovation and plain hard work over accounting principles. They had a whole aircraft carrier to play on!

    Holes in the premise and ongoing plot were (and remain) plentiful. They did not distract me but inspired me to fill them long after I was taken for the cinematic ride.

    The setting was further along the optimist's future than popularly inferred, what with artificial gravity without a centrifuge, no visible means of "space freighter" propulsion, semi-autonomous maintenance "drones" that I positively marveled at, skintight spacesuits, and a fleeting inference by the lead character of terrestrial climate (or damage?) control. (Then again, perhaps accounting principles DID sometimes prevail.)

    "Shooting the rapids" through a "quadrant of the outer rings" had to involve Saturn's upper atmosphere, for even then we were not quite sure what that planet's rings were truly made of. And I knew Trumbull had set his sights on Saturn because the gas giant was supposed to have been the spaceship Discovery's destination in "2001".

    The ecological/environmental theme was timely, likely because we were just coming around to realize the only people who would make a difference were us. And, no, for the record, I did not endorse Freeman Lowell's countermeasures though they certainly made me wonder what would happen next...

    Though the film score's songs were rendered "troppo vibrato" the sum of the music gently supported the film and enhanced some scenes. This was clearly not "space music". Years passed before I recognized the composer.

    And though the script couldn't have given Bruce Dern much guidance in his characterization of Lowell he gave everything he had, which showed in every frame. Lowell's equally fleeting reference to "Everything is the same, all the people are exactly the same" on Earth while trying to provoke some response from his shipmates also supplied plenty for me to privately ponder for awhile...

    This film may not age well but is to be forgiven its faults.
  • Look - Just because there is a message in this movie about mankind's inclination toward destroying the Earth, doesn't make this a good movie. This movie is awful. I can't stand fiction that tries to pawn itself off as Science Fiction with bad science. There are limits to suspension of disbelief. The whole premise of the movie is outrageously ridiculous. There is little if any plot. The movie climaxes in the first 20 minutes and there is little conflict, and what conflict there is, is implied. I love the Earth and the trees and fresh fruit just like everyone else. I consider myself a tree hugging nature guy. I thought I would relate to this nature loving main character after his first speech, however, I later found him repulsive. I cannot understand how this movie ended up on a top 10 list of sci-fi movies. The fact that the main character has to come to the realization that he did in regard to the forest at the end, proves that science was a second thought in this movie. (Any dim-witted scientist wanna-be would have seen the problem inside of 30 seconds.)

    If you are and your buddies are looking for a good laugh to go with your "wasted" night, you might get a chuckle out of this. Otherwise, stay away from this movie and don't say I didn't warn you.
  • Maybe one of the most moving things about this film is the fact that the drones (small droids) give such powerful performances without ever being able to utter a word. Maybe a "nod" in some ways to the days of the silent movie. The environmental message is as powerful today as it was in 1972.

    An extremely good yet brief film that I felt I had to comment upon it. Enjoyed the hippy theme tune as well just because it fitted right in. These types of film are rare but precious. I remember watching this as a child and it had an impact on me then so I thought I should revisit the piece 20 years later. Absolutely not disappointed.
  • First off, gotta say I thought the plot of this movie was Moon for the longest time. However once I figured it out I thought, hey why not watch it. The concept is good and it is done well, but I thought the "climax" was rushed, causing the last third of the film to feel slow. But, a must watch if you're a fan of films like 2001 A Space Odyssey.

    Also, there are drones in the movie, and they make this movie for me. They inject little bouts of comedy and fun into it.
  • Now, I am not someone who wandered out of his genre and happened to see this movie by accident. I love science fiction -- old, new, I think most of it has something to offer.

    This film would be the exception. Some films are fun because they're cheesy (Event Horizon), and some are great because they're thought-provoking (The Day the Earth Stood Still). Silent Running is an obnoxious portrayal of a hippie who should never have been allowed on a space ship to begin with.

    The premise here has a lot of promise; had the characters been more believable or the film itself less... well, there are a lot of statements that fit here. Politically skewed, weakly written, off-balance, utterly implausible (even for a sci-fi flick)... the list goes on.

    I had heard of this movie as some kind of milestone for science fiction. It is not, and should not be considered such; it's hard to even take this movie seriously, as it is obviously meant to be. It also fails as a campy popcorn flick, which it was definitely NOT meant to be, because the message is so overbearing that most of it is just painful to watch, regardless of whether you agree with it.

    I absolutely do not recommend this movie; it has no redeeming value -- not for ecologists, not for pacifists, not for anyone short of Greenpeace supporters on downers. Avoid this, for your own sake.
An error has occured. Please try again.