User Reviews (73)

Add a Review

  • My mom remembers seeing "Willard" when it first came out, and so she encouraged me to see it. It tells the story of Willard Stiles (Bruce Davison), an outcast who still lives with his mother Henrietta (Elsa Lanchester). But Willard discovers that their house has some other inhabitants: rats. He quickly befriends the critters, and then turns them into a sort of army who will obey all his commands. To add to this situation, Willard and his mother believed that his father died naturally, but it begins to look like Willard's boss Al Martin (Ernest Borgnine) may have been involved.

    The old, dark house, and the young man living with his mother might bring to mind "Psycho", but "Willard" seems to me to be more of a story of an outcast taking revenge on the world that rejected him.
  • The progenitor of the 'when-good-animals-go-bad' trend in '70s schlock films, "Willard" brings us the story of a boy and his rat, or eventually his rats, given the fecundity of rodents. The movie has the look of '70s TV and in places could be an extended episode of "The Night Stalker" or "Night Gallery" (especially the close-ups of busybody neighbour Charlotte (Jody Gilbert)). Bruce Davidson is quite good in the titular role, playing Willard as a normal looking nebbish, which makes his ascent to ratte-führer even more incongruous. His mother is played by the great Elsa Lanchester (one of the few actresses who could out-ham husband Charles Laughton) and Ernest Borgnine rounds out the main cast as Willard's lascivious dirt-bag of a boss. The story, script and direction are pretty simple, although there are some good jump-cuts to show people can be rats too (the best is the cut from the humans stuffing their faces at a particularly unappetizing buffet to the rats stuffing their snouts in Willard's basement). The rat wranglers earned their pay, as some scenes include hundreds of the rodents and Davidson seems completely at ease with the animals, which contributes to the film's verisimilitude. More fun than scary (unless you are musophobic) and not particularly gruesome, the movie appeals more to boomer nostalgia than to cinematic connoisseurship. Followed by a sequel "Ben", which contains the prettiest ode to a rat ever put on film.
  • dperky15 February 2020
    Bruce Davison plays Willard, a repressed 29 year old with no social life outside of his mother (Elsa Lanchester) and her loudmouthed friends who constantly nitpick everything about him and tell him why he's never amounted to anything. Even worse, his boss (Ernest Borgnine at his nastiest) stole the company from Willard's deceased father and seems intent on running it into the ground and never giving Willard a chance to take over. Everything changes when he befriends a few rats he finds in his home and he realizes that he has the power to force them to do his bidding. It looks like everyone who ever doubted or wished ill will of Willard is about to get what's coming to them.

    More psychological character study than outright horror film, Willard is blessed with a strong script with great characters and wonderful performances all around. If you're here for big shocks, jump scares, or buckets of blood, I'd suggest looking elsewhere, because this movie barely even earns its PG rating. What keeps it interesting are the characters and their human drama. If that sounds like something you might be interested in, then I highly recommend this movie.
  • A mousy, introverted young man befriends and teaches rats basic commands. Soon his home and life are preoccupied with this rodent infestation, coming particularly close to two rats, Ben and Socrates. Willard is played with great skill by Bruce Davison, communicating to the audience his despondency with family life as well as with his job. He has a love-hate relationship with his dotty, doting mother, played with the usual charm only Elsa Lanchester can exude. His relationship with his mother's friends is distant, and with his employer Martin, disastrous. Martin is played with relish by Ernest Borgnine, making the audience feel little sympathy for his fate. Naturally, Willard trains the rats to do "bad" things and this leads to a battle of wills between Willard and the main rat Ben(the lead character in the film's sequel BEN). Overall, the film is rather slowly paced, but well-acted and rewarding in the end.
  • Bruce Davison memorably portrays the title character in this entertaining animal-themed thriller that was a big hit back in its day. Willard Stiles is a wimpy, awkward doormat of a man, regularly chewed out by his demanding boss Martin (Ernest Borgnine) and harangued by his clingy, equally demanding mother Henrietta (Elsa Lanchester). He has zero friends in the world, until he decides to take pity on the scores of rats infesting his property. He even gives the two most dominant characters names: "Socrates" is a gentle white rat, "Ben" a more aggressive brown rat. Willard soon becomes able to get the rats to do his bidding, which comes in handy in such matters as revenge.

    It's not hard to see why "Willard" would have connected with audiences back in 1971. The relationship between the boy and his rodents is admittedly touching, and the head rats Socrates and Ben are very well trained (as well as rats can be trained). Now, granted, you don't always sympathize with Willard. Sometimes he comes off as a real jerk. But you feel bad for him often enough to enjoy his revenge. For example, getting the rats to ruin a backyard dinner party held by Martin. You also hope that his budding relationship with a lovely temp employee (the appealing Sondra Locke) will better his situation, or at least brighten him up a bit. For this viewer, it didn't matter so much that the film "lacked style"; it was still a reasonably entertaining story (based on the book "The Ratman's Notebooks" by Stephen Gilbert) told in capable enough fashion by screenwriter Gilbert Ralston and director Daniel Mann. The music score by Alex North is simply wonderful.

    Borgnine provides excellent support, obviously having fun with playing a mean, conniving boss who seems to take a perverse pleasure in humiliating Willard in front of others. Lanchester is just right during the amount of screen time that she gets. Michael Dante, Jody Gilbert, John Myhers, J. Pat O'Malley, and others comprise a fine supporting cast.

    The clear lesson to be learned from this one is simply this: if you have very few friends in this world, do NOT turn your back on them, no matter how small they may be.

    Followed by a sequel, "Ben", just one year later, and a second adaptation of the book in 2003 (with Crispin Glover as Willard, R. Lee Ermey as Martin, and Jackie Burroughs as Henrietta).

    Seven out of 10.
  • SnoopyStyle22 October 2017
    Willard Stiles (Bruce Davison) is an introvert. His mother is bedridden. Her friends throw him a surprise birthday party and berate him for losing his father's business to Al Martin (Ernest Borgnine) who hired Joan (Sondra Locke) to take over his work. He has no friends but finds friendship with the rats in the backyard. Soon, his friends are multitudes willing to do his bidding.

    The idea is there but this is shot in a flat, uninspired manner. The actors are either first rate or on their way. Borgnine is gloriously evil. Davison is a little green around the edges. This should be a lot more compelling. There should be more tension. It's got some creepiness but I would like more.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I remember seeing Willard as a kid - enjoyed the film then. Watching it all these years later I still find it a good film.

    It seems that Willard is a 27 year old man without many real friends. He stayed with his sick mother & his father passed away leaving the business to a colleague and Willard works for the man - this man wants Willard out of the office. After Willard's mother passes away there is a large mortgage left on the house and Willard's boss wants it as well. When at home, Willard spends most of his time with the rats he's raised and the two rats he's closest to are Ben and Socrates. Willard brings his rats to work with him, they get loose and his boss kills Socrates - that's when Willard becomes vengeful and Ben is willing to help.

    This is a pretty good character & story driven film. Worth watching if you like the older horror films.

    7.5/10
  • billcr1225 March 2018
    I first saw this film in 1971 and just watched it again 47 years later. The only line I remembered was tear him up. I will not explain the line. A young man working in an office and living with his mother in a grand old California house is befriended by some rats who he feeds every day. Of course, he is treated badly by his boss and eventually gets revenge by using his rodent buddies. Ernest Borgnine is the bad guy and he is hilarious. The movie is quite campy and it is highly entertaining. This ain't high art but it is worth it for a few laughs.
  • DrSatan6 June 2000
    Warning: Spoilers
    WARNING: CONTAINS SPOILERS Willard is a very slow moving character study. It is not, as it is billed, a horror film, unless you have a phobia relating to rats. Yes, scenes with the rats can deliver a gross out, but that's about it. The only really horrifying thing in the film is the way the rest of the cast (excluding Sondra Locke's character) treat Willard. Basically what we have here is the story of a shy man, suppressed by his overbearing mother and without his father who is put upon by everyone. He withdraws so much that his only friends are rats. At various points in the movie he uses the rats to ruin his bosses party, steal money, and finally murder his boss. All of the acting is good, and Borgnine is excellent as Willard's creepy boss. But this can't save the film from its glacier pacing and inappropriate music. Ultimately the film is a let down because nothing really happens. I do not recommend this film unless you really like slow paced character sketches or are afraid of rats.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Here in NYC, the subway workers of the MTA who labor in the tunnels have a nickname for the rats that they frequently encounter: "track bunnies." It's a cute name that masks the fact that for most New Yorkers, the Rattus rattus is an animal that they feel should ONLY be seen down in the subway tracks, from the safe perspective of the subway platform. The sight of one of those grisly rodents anywhere else is guaranteed to engender disgust and an atavistic terror. And perhaps it was with this very knowledge that the producers of the 1971 film "Willard" felt confident that they would have a surefire hit on their hands, as did indeed prove the case. Based on the 1968 novel "The Ratman's Notebooks" by Stephen Gilbert, "Willard" was released some three years later, in June '71. I am old enough to remember how popular the film was way back when, but between this and that, was only able to catch up with it this past week...47 years later. To my great surprise, "Willard" turns out to be not nearly as grisly an experience as I had been led to believe, but still, one guaranteed to entertain; not nearly as frightening as another rat attack film that I recently watched, 1983's "Of Unknown Origin," but still fun.

    In the film, the viewer meets Willard Stiles--an awkward social misfit who lives with his mother in an enormous old mansion in what seems to be Beverly Hills, and played by Bruce Davison--on the occasion of his 27th birthday. His mother, Henrietta (the former Bride of Frankenstein herself, Elsa Lanchester, here in the midst of winding down her legendary career), has thrown a party for him, peopled by all her aged cronies; Willard, it seems, has no friends of his own. But that soon changes, when he notices some rats in the mansion's overgrown backyard. He ultimately trains them and brings them into the house, where they breed and multiply at a startling rate, until the entire cellar is crawling with the little beasties. Meanwhile, we get to see WIllard's work life, and it is a fairly miserable one, at that. Willard works in the iron foundry that his deceased father had started years ago, but which is now run by the man who stole that business, Martin (played by the great Ernest Borgnine in a performance that should have been nominated for a Best Supporting Actor award). Martin browbeats and torments Willard relentlessly, to Willard's increasing frustration. The viewer is tipped to Martin's miserable personality immediately by the sign that he proudly displays on his desk: "Do Unto Others Before They Do Unto You," his seeming credo in life. We also get to see Willard's clumsy interactions with the new, pretty temp in the office, Joan (played by Sondra Locke, here in her third film). Ultimately, though, after the death of his mother and after learning that Martin has designs on purchasing and tearing down his beloved home, Willard cracks, and decides to use his obedient rat army to take vengeance on Martin once and for all....

    "Willard," to my surprise, maintains a comparatively light, almost humorous tone for its first 2/3, during which we see Willard use his pets to cause pandemonium at Martin's outdoor anniversary party, how he gets rid of a pet cat that Joan sweetly gives him, and how he uses his rats to steal needed money from a wealthy client. Matters turn decidedly more grim, however, in that final third, when Socrates--the white-furred rat who is one of Willard's favorites--is killed by Martin in the office, precipitating Willard's retaliation. The viewer waits patiently for Martin's comeuppance, and when it finally does come, it's pretty much a doozy. But the film withholds its grisliest section till the very end, when Willard and Ben--the black-furred rat who had been another especial favorite--turn on each other back at the mansion. Remarkably, the film manages the almost impossible feat of making rats--possibly one of the most detested of all creatures--appear cute...at least in the film's first hour. Notice that I am not saying "adorable," but only cute. (Several friends of mine have told me over the years what wonderful pets these critters can make, and I have only nodded my head and said, "Yeah, sure" in response.) Kudos should go out to rat wrangler and trainer Moe Di Sesso, who trained both Socrates and Ben for their work in this film. Director Daniel Mann, who had previously helmed such classic pictures as "The Rose Tattoo," "I'll Cry Tomorrow" and "BUtterfield 8," here directs his first horror film in a fairly pedestrian manner, but yet manages to inject suspense into those final scenes. In the lead, Davison gives a fine performance as the increasingly unhinged Willard, but for this viewer, it is Ernest Borgnine who steals the film, with his seemingly effortless portrayal of the coarse and slimy Martin. What a terrific actor he could be; no wonder he was in such demand at this stage of his lengthy career! (And indeed, "Willard" was just one of six films that Borgnine appeared in that year, including "Bunny O'Hare" and "Hannie Caulder.") Remarkably, "Willard" proved so popular that a sequel, "Ben," was released in 1972, and yes, I do hope to finally catch up with that one one day soon....
  • A few weeks ago I commented to a friend that Willard & Ben were fondly remembered movies from the 70s - he lent me a VHS copy of Willard which I foolishly watched. If you want to keep your fond memories it's best not to look to closely with older eyes.
  • poe42630 March 2002
    Made the mistake of reading the book before seeing the movie; the movie, as a consequence, couldn't possibly live up to my expectations. Nor did it. But that's not a put-down. While there were some things that irked me (the mother rat's humble "thanks" at one point, the rubber rats all too much in evidence at the birthday party, etc.), Bruce Davidson and Ernest Borgnine deliver solid performances that help keep one focused on the twisted relationships that are the core of this film. (Elsa Lanchester as Willard's mewling mother also deserves mention.) I don't know how this one would hold up today, but, back in 1971, it was a must-see.
  • This is a film whose sequel is better known . BEN is remembered by people of a certain age after being broadcast one night and everyone discussing it in class . Rats were a mainstay of horror helped no doubt by the notorious British horror writer James Herbert whose novels were a massive favourite of British schoolboys in the 1980s . WILLARD is a film I had no knowledge and as far as I know had never been shown on British network television or if it had no one I knew had ever seen it and I only knew of its existence by looking up BEN on IMDb to find that fondly remembered film was a sequel to this one . I also managed to confuse the name Bruce Davison with Bruce Dern and had visions of a bitter and twisted misanthrope plotting cruel revenge against a world who has rejected him . This as it transpires in not how WILLARD pans out

    There's a strange tone to this film . While up and coming film makers like George A Romero and Wes Craven were pushing the boat out as to what they could get away with WILLARD looks and feels exactly like a film that treats the Hats code as the word of God which was no longer in effect during its production . In fact much of it feels like it might be a romantic comedy or a Walt Disney film as a socially inept put upon young man trying to find some sort of target in life as destiny conspires against him

    Davison occasionally over plays the eponymous title character , but you do feel genuine pity for him as he returns home from work on his 27th birthday and the guests of the party are all friends of his infirm mother . He has no social life and his life revolves around work where he is bullied by his heartless boss played expertly by Ernest Borgnine . As some people have picked up on - it's too obvious not to notice to be honest - WILLARD spends most of its running time as a character driven drama with an element of black comedy and even when it does throw its hand in and becomes an out and out horror revenge drama it's quite bloodless . Some people might think this a completely bland film for that very reason but it makes a nice change even in a film from 40 years ago where character is to the fore instead of gore
  • Nervous young lad, living in a dilapidated Los Angeles manor with his nagging mother, befriends the rat population in his backyard, which comes in handy when he needs help committing a robbery or scaring off his enemies. Daniel Mann, the director of "The Rose Tattoo" and "I'll Cry Tomorrow," couldn't have been very happy about directing this venture, yet the low-budget picture grossed over $19 million at the box-office (a huge haul in 1971). It's an unpretentious exercise, and Mann does attempt to bring out the character drama within Gilbert Ralston's screenplay--and nearly succeeds. Bruce Davison works hard at creating an original, eccentric anti-hero, and the tone of the film is surprisingly jaunty, not excessively ugly or downbeat. Mann sets a brisk pace but, despite all efforts, this is still a picture designed mainly to give a squeamish audience a few visual jabs, and there isn't much to contemplate at the finale. ** from ****
  • A little flick that blends elements of psycho-drama and animals-run-amuck, along with a hint of old-dark-house. Willard is a socially-maladjusted young man who lives in a gloomy, Victorian house with his co-dependant mother. Their relationship constitutes the weird part of the movie, nudge, nudge. Willard is tolerantly allowed employment at his late father's business, presided over by passive-agressive Ernest Borgnine. With no social life and no friends, Willard resorts to training rats with above-average intelligence. Of course, things take a dark turn when Willard's mother dies and Borgnine's bully tendencies come to the fore, prompting the put-upon Willard to use his rodent buddies to even the score. Also on hand is Sondra Locke as caring co-worker who tries to enter into Willard's world and may be his means of salvation. You find yourself rooting for her to win out. Spawned a more (in)famous sequel, BEN, remembered primarily for it's theme song, which provided Michael Jackson with one of his first solo hits. Very appropriate, in hindsight.
  • Although successful enough to rate a sequel and at the time of its release achieved the distinction of a parody of it's poster in 'Private Eye' depicting Harold Wilson as 'Wislard', the film plays more like a black comedy than the horror film suggested by the poster; an impression reinforced by Alex North's eccentric score.

    Sondra Locke looks decidedly out of place in such surroundings, while Elisa Lanchester as Willard's mother mother manages to be even crazier than Piper Laurie in 'Carrie'; and who hasn't wanted (SLIGHT SPOILER COMING:) their boss to suffer an undignified fate like Ernest Borgnine does?

    As for Willard's little friends themselves they actually seem rather cute (rats in reality are highly intelligent and make excellent pets) and the closeups of Ben are frequently worthy of Lassie.
  • BA_Harrison25 October 2018
    Warning: Spoilers
    Ever since the whole 'Black Death' thing, rats have had a bad rap, but I love the much-maligned rodents: I owned a pair of pink-eyed whites and they were adorable - inquisitive, intelligent and very cute. My affection for the animals made Willard a real treat, the bewhiskered critters putting in winning performances throughout as the obedient furry friends of social misfit Willard Stiles (Bruce Davison).

    Rat fans be warned though: it's not all cutesy fun. As Willard slowly loses control of his life following the death of his overbearing mother, and decides to exact revenge on his bullying boss Martin (Ernest Borgnine), the rat action gets more disturbing. Numerous rats are beaten by a chair when they crash Martin's dinner party, loveable white rat Socrates is poked to death in a stock cupboard, and, following the death of his boss (who leaps out of a window when he is attacked by the rodents), Willard is forced to dispose of his little accomplices by drowning them.

    Of course, those who find rats about as appealing as I do spiders (aaaargh!) might feel differently: they'll be squirming in their seats as the rats go about their business and cheering when they get killed. Either way - love 'em or loathe 'em - the rats make this film highly entertaining, although solid human support from Davison and Borgnine certainly helps. The film ends with large rat Ben, who escaped a watery death, taking revenge on Willard with the help of some furry pals, paving the way for the following year's sequel, Ben.

    6.5 out of 10, rounded up to 7 for IMDb.
  • There's quite a few horror movies dealing with killer rats, but the story of good old Willard Stiles (based on the novel Ratman's Notebooks by Gilbert Ralston) is still very unique, because it mainly revolves on the communicative link between the vicious rodents and a human being. This is actually a predecessor to all the films centering on (young) people that use special powers to extract vengeance on all those that have wronged them, like "Jennifer", "Stanley" and even Stephen King/Brian De Palma's "Carrie". Hmm, how strange I only just notice now how all these film have the protagonists' names as a title. Anyway, the titular character here is an extremely introvert, nerdy and oppressed 27-year-old guy whose life is truly worthless. His domineering mother invites her own friends to Willard's birthday parties (also because he hasn't got any), he has an inferior job in the factory his own father founded and the boss Mr. Martin treats him like a slave. The only person in the world who respects Willard is his temp secretary, but he doesn't even notice that himself. Willard finally finds some happiness in life when he befriends a handful of rats in his backyard. As the number of rats rapidly increases, Willard learns how to correspond with them and even succeeds in controlling their actions. He keeps his two favorite rodents (a white one called Socrates and a big fat mean-spirited black one called Ben) with him at all times and uses the hundreds of others as a personal army of retribution. "Willard" is not a scary or gory film, but it does feature some admirably atmospheric sequences, dark & grim set pieces and a masterfully tense climax. The hectically crawling rats are eerie to behold, but still the film primarily relies on good old-fashioned human acting performances. Bruce Davison, Elsa Lanchester and Sandra Locke are great but it is – as always – Ernest Borgnine who steals the show. His character Mr. Martin is a sleazy, corrupt, greedy and preposterous SOB you simply love to hate. Borgnine depicted quite a few memorably villainous types in his long & terrific career (like the satanic cult-leader in "The Devil's Rain" and the uncanny Amish patriarch in "Deadly Blessing") and Mr. Martin definitely ranks high on top, too! In 2003, "Willard" received the widely feared remake treatment, but against all odd the new version, starring cult favorite Crispin Glover as Willard and R. Lee Ermey as Mr. Martin, turned out to be a genuine winner. There's also a direct sequel called "Ben", which is actually more of a spin-off with the evil rat as the anti-hero, but that film was too Disney for my likings and only worth seeing because a young Michael Jackson sung the title song.
  • wayno-612 August 2012
    Warning: Spoilers
    MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS

    Ah rats! No wait. That is the whole plot in 2 words.

    From "Marty" to Martin. My how Ernest Borgnine, fell from grace.

    How many of you knew, that Willard is the first name of Republican Presidential nominee, Willard Mitt Romney? Okay whoever named this kid is thankfully out of the gene pool. Who the hell names their kid after a baseball glove? What's next? A boy named shuffleboard?

    Okay anyway - the famous tag-line: "Where dreams end...Willard begins." That may apply to our poor baseball glove.

    No I could not begin to tell you how devastatingly challenged the contact lens acting, plot, dialogue, and scenery are. Nor could I tell you how dreadful the music is. While this is NOT as bad as Manos: The Hands of Fate, I am not too sure I'd ever watch this quality challenged cinematic blunder again. It is NOT even good fodder for Mystery Science Theatre.

    I think Alan Alda's quote: "There certainly is NO lack of slowness" sums it perfectly.
  • There is no shortage of films about young people who get angry and take revenge via some unethical means - Carrie, Evilspeak, Kiss of the Tarantula...the list goes on. But what makes Willard stand out from the rest of the crowd? Well, the answer to that has to be 'nothing really', though the film did come out before a lot of the similar films so I guess it deserves some credit for that fact. Willard is a fairly creepy little affair which features a handful of the 'classic' horror elements, those being rats, a creepy kid, a lonely old house etc and while the story comes together fairly well, Willard's main problem is that it's just not interesting enough. The plot focuses on Willard; a troubled young man who lives alone with his mother after the death of his father some years earlier. He's put under pressure by his mother his boss, who wants to force him out of the company because he wants Willard's house. Willard's only friends (aside from the girl at work) are his two pet rats, Ben and Socrates, but after a tragedy at work; Willard decides that enough is enough...

    The title character is played by Bruce Davison, who if you ask me isn't really creepy enough. The whole rats thing adds to his creepiness, but on the face of it he looks like your average kid, and personally I think the film would have worked better with someone a bit more foreboding in the lead role. Davison gets excellent support from Ernest Borgnine as his unsympathetic boss, and Borgnine manages to steal the show every time he appears on screen. The plot does move rather slowly, however, and the film cant really described as a thriller. The whole thing about Willard and his rats doesn't come through well either; we see him holding them, stroking them and talking to them but there's never really too much of a bond formed and the film constantly feels like it can't portray what it is that it wants to portray. There is something enjoyable about Willard though, the way it plods along means that it's easy to get into and it never became boring enough to make me want to reach for the remote. I have to say that the ending was a bit of disappointment, but you could do worse than this film I suppose.
  • I'm as creeped out as the next person by rats, but they aren't what I'd call horror-movie material. If anything, this movie made them a lot cuddlier and likeable than I'd regard them in real life. Bruce Davison plays his character like some kind of idiot savante. His over-acted nervous ticks got on my nerves. Oddly enough, for a guy who sometimes hammed it up, Ernest Borgnine wastes a good performance. He's pretty much the only believable character in this whole mess. Sondra Locke looks good and manages to get through a movie without coming across as a screeching harpy, which is an achievement for her. If this was the undercard at the Friday drive-in let's hope it was paired with a good feature or the place would have emptied out early.
  • A truly memorable 1971 thriller that has became a bit of an underground classic.

    Handsom, shy Willard Stiles doesn't have an ideal life. He lives with his domineering widowed mother, is bullied by his boss, and doesn't have any friends. That is, until he befriends the rats in his garden and learns that he can make them do his bidding!

    Highlighted by a touching and sympathetic performance from Davison, Willard is a different kind of "nature-strikes-back" film. It's a rare occasion where the human characters, rather than the animals, drive the film to its intense climax. There's plenty of twists and turns to be had, as well as a few moments of skin-crawl, especially for those who aren't fond of rodents! The movie also has a bit of a darkly humorous side to it. It's a bit of a rare movie to find these days, but seek it out and hope for a much-needed DVD release of this B movie classic.

    Followed by a rather dark remake in 2003

    *** 1/2 out of ****
  • About 50 years ago, a small psychological horror movie came out based on Stephen Gilbert's short novel Ratman's Notebooks, entitled Willard. While not a critical darling upon its original release in early 1971, it did garnish enough audience revenue to warrant a semi-followup a year later. The main premise of the film, similar to the book, centers around a young man who relates a lot more to rats than other people, which is a fascinating character study on paper. As for how the film turned out, while not without its jumbled pacing, it is a fairly disturbing insight into a social misfit simply too old for his own good.

    Willard Stiles (played by a young Bruce Davison) is a pleasantly presented albeit lonely young man with little connection to other people, even his aging mother, Henrietta Stiles (Elsa Lanchaster). Living with his mother in a run-down mansion, Willard ends up raising a horde of rats whom he befriends, and ends up basing his whole life around them. From the start of the picture, Willard seems well intent and mannered, but he becomes more relatable upon fathering all of the rats in his house backyard. As unhealthy as it may seem to the average person, these rats are the only thing that Willard has any real affiliation with, which makes his normal day job all the more peculiar. Even though he works at his family owned business, he works for the conniving Al Martin (Ernest Borgnine), who took over the company and pretty much shuts Willard down at any chance in the most subtle of ways. As a result, the unpredictable and frightening presence of these otherwise dirty rodents are perfect for poor Willard to maintain his life, as they give him a good reason to live life in his own weird way.

    However, director Daniel Mann and screenwriter Gilbert Ralston hint at how slowly Willard falls into stubbornness and selfishness in treating his house as something for his new family as opposed to his real one. Given how much pressure people keep putting on Willard to sell his mother's home, as well as so much hostility coming from Mr. Martin and other colleagues, the otherwise innocent man trains the rats to wreak havoc on the people by means of vengeance. It's clear that Willard does value his newer family of rodents, but the levels on which he abuses his ability and their own well being go further and further into misfortune. The only human Willard has any sort of care towards is his friend and assistant Joan, who while a fairly bland female companion, does feel like a much more genuine contrast compared to everyone else in the poor man's life. It becomes all the more heartbreaking that she has no idea of the hole her own colleague has continuously dug himself into. As the old saying goes, absolute power corrupts absolutely, such is the case with Willard and his rat family.

    Aside from Willard, the other character who practically steals the show from time to time is Ben, a black rat with behavioral problems. Although the rats in general give Willard a lot of trouble economically and mentally, Ben is the biggest problem child of them all due to his mischievous attitude and growing discomfort towards his own caretaker. Perhaps the one notable flaw of the movie is how it does take a while to really get going, as it does spend a lot of time showcasing Willard's miserable mother and her annoying companions to the point of disinterest. However, once Ben and other rats start to take over Willard's life, the film becomes a lot more intense, to the point where Alex North's initial brightfully cheerful score grows more and more sinister overtime. It's been said that the aforementioned director intended to start off the film as a dark comedy and then expose it as a full on horror flick with some blood and death here and there. In a way, by testing the patience of the viewers and allowing them to soak themselves into these rats, it made the payoff a lot more satisfying.

    Looking at Willard 50 years after its original appearance, there's a lot to admire about it, and not just from how much popularity it gave to rats. Knowing just how much some human beings connect with other animals over their own kind, seeing the demise of an innocent loner through his failed care taking of a murderous rat family has left quite the impact on people over the decades. I would definitely give this a recommendation if you're interested in killer animal flicks, because it also acts as a reminder to not take your own pets for granted. The more you delude yourself in your creations, the further you will fall, and they'll do it for you.
  • It's an ok movie, you have sympathy for Willard especially having been ruled over by his overpowering Mother and boss; the horror however is very mild. If you however, like my Mum, can't stand the sight of scurrying rodents, it's probably worse than the excorcist.

    What I found draining was the amount of times the name Willard is said by the other characters, especially his mother who could get 4 or 5 "Willards" into one sentence. Now I'm sure this was the intention, to show how henpecked and worn down he was but honestly, if I never hear the name Willard again I will be really happy.

    I did enjoy seeing old favourite, Ernest Borgnine playing a bully and, in the current work climate, soon to be ex boss for being very inappropriate with his staff.

    Worth a watch, if I watch it again I will update this with a "Willard" count for the whole movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    ~Spoiler~

    Before viewing the remake, I decided to take a look at the lost original. Willard is an unusual piece of horror from the early 70's. It portrays an interesting character study of Willard Stiles, a Momma's boy who seemingly can't even think for himself. As far as that goes, I think it's a brilliant film. Bruce Davison is fascinating in this role. His character actually grows during the course of the movie and he portrays Willard very well. Ernest Borgnine is at his usual best as well. He plays the villain, and he's good, I just find him too damn likable. Then again, I have never been more p*ssed in my life at someone killing a rat. My only problem with Willard is that it hasn't aged real well. It's unmistakably a film from the 70's and I think that takes away from it a little bit. The thing that surprised me the most was the low body count. This film is more about a young man coming out of his shell than it is about killer rats. That doesn't make it a bad movie, there's just not too much horror in it. I happened to really enjoy it and I'm looking forward to the remake as well. The ending may have been anti-climatic, but it was fitting. You don't turn your back on your friends, even if they are killer rats. Younger audiences will crave more bloodshed but the core story is still very solid and worth watching. Willard could certainly use a DVD transfer.
An error has occured. Please try again.