83
Metascore
22 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 100Chicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertChicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertRarely do movies affect us so deeply. The first time I saw Cries and Whispers, I found myself shrinking down in my seat, somehow trying to escape from the implications of Bergman’s story. The Exorcist also has that effect--but we’re not escaping from Friedkin’s implications, we’re shrinking back from the direct emotional experience he’s attacking us with. This movie doesn’t rest on the screen; it’s a frontal assault.
- 100Chicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonChicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonThis jolting tale of a 12-year-old girl possessed by the devil, her desperate movie actress mother and the two priests called in to exorcise the demon, actually seems a deeper movie now -- more intense, less formulaic or shallow. Yet it's also retained all its original hypnotic narrative grip. [2000 re-release]
- 100Rolling StonePeter TraversRolling StonePeter TraversThere's something elemental about The Exorcist, even with the new hopeful ending that betrays the bleak original. [2000 re-release]
- 91Entertainment WeeklyOwen GleibermanEntertainment WeeklyOwen GleibermanHere, in paranoid, bad acid trip form, is the real birth of girl power. [2000 re-release]
- 88New York PostLou LumenickNew York PostLou LumenickDirector William Friedkin, (“The French Connection” and this year’s “Rules of Engagement”) has always been a provocateur, a master of the shock. But his very lack of subtlety is both the strength and weakness of The Exorcist in the 21st century. [2000 re-release]
- 80VarietyRobert KoehlerVarietyRobert KoehlerJust as some of the footage deepens what is already there, additions in final reel, though closer to Blatty’s wishes, restate the obvious or add a feel-good patina which pushes the film closer to our own audience-pleasing period than the more daring early ’70s. [2000 re-release]
- 80Washington PostDesson ThomsonWashington PostDesson ThomsonA museum piece, something to be enjoyed for its historical value. [2000 re-release]
- 75New York Daily NewsJack MathewsNew York Daily NewsJack MathewsThe Exorcist is still shocking, but mostly because of its graphic, anti-religious language. [2000 re-release]
- 50Christian Science MonitorDavid SterrittChristian Science MonitorDavid SterrittIn both its original 1973 version and its expanded 2000 edition, this hugely popular horror yarn is less a cleverly spun story than a disjointed collection of shockeroos, surrounding a few ghoulishly effective moments with overcooked plot twists and in-your-face vulgarity. [2000 re-release]
- 40Washington PostStephen HunterWashington PostStephen Hunter11 minutes longer than the original, and 11 minutes worse. [2000 re-release]