Add a Review

  • Skyscrapers have long been the butt of jokes about what they symbolise, and this film even mentions the Eiffel Tower while omitting to mention what the dome of St. Paul's Cathedral obviously resembles. Rather than simply thumbing through a stack of back issues of 'Mayfair' for inspiration our hero instead finds it necessary to actually mate with a succession of obliging females until the eventual plot 'twist' that provides him with his muse and the film with a conclusion.

    Like so many actors in old British films, Derek Royle - who played Henry's boss Sir Bernard - already looked familiar to me; the penny finally dropping that he later played the ill-fated Mr Leeman, the guest found dead in bed in 'Fawlty Towers'.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I mainly watched this to see Roger Lloyd-Pack, Owen from Vicar of Dibley, in a 'sexy' movie. I can see why he never made it as a main actor and has largely worked in comedies and/or as a character actor, cos his performance here is more wooden than almost anything I've seen in actual pornographic movies (not that I admit to seeing any of course). His character is charmless and dull and he seems to reciting the script in the same manner a kidnap victim recites his captors message to a video camera.

    Along with a incredibly implausible story line not even worth mentioning we mainly get a dreary cavalcade of breasts and the occasional flash of bushy 1970s girly parts, as our hero, a sort of early Ron Jeremy minus any personality or wit, grudgingly ploughs through them apparently in alphabetical order or something. The climax (hah) has our bland lothario win the day by designing the most ludicrously inept and unprofessional architectural design, based on a womans breast, AND get married, a goal totally at issue with the tone of the rest of the movie but obviously the secret goal of all modern young sexually liberated post-hippy person, according to the writers.

    Not worth seeing unless a/ its free b/you are particularly perverse in your viewing habits and c/ in this modern age unable to find any better 'adult material' for your own perusal. Only if all 3 conditions are met should you watch this.
  • CONFESSIONS OF A SEX MANIAC is an odd little British sex comedy that feels very low budget and very half hearted. The title is an odd one too; it makes it sound like some horrible giallo when in fact it's a relatively genteel movie, although the producers of the CONFESSIONS... series weren't pleased and forced a name change to THE MAN WHO COULDN'T GET ENOUGH. The film stars the one and only Roger Lloyd Pack (yes, Trigger from ONLY FOOLS AND HORSES) as an aspiring young architect who unsurprisingly enough spends most of his time bedding agreeable young women. When his baldie boss tasks him with designing a new, super expensive building to add to the London skyline, Pack takes inspiration from the female body and decides to design one in the shape of the perfect breast.

    The rest of the film sees him hunting for such a thing, if it even exists. So it's an excuse to show a number of women topless, although of course there's plenty of romping between the sheets too as you end up seeing more of Pack than you ever really wanted to. He gives an odd, laconic, deadpan turn here, which I quite enjoyed given that I'm a big fan of the actor, although the rest of the unknown cast aren't up to much. Truth be told, there's no use proclaiming this film the 'worst ever' when there are so many bad entries in the genre to begin with (SHE'LL FOLLOW YOU ANYWHERE, anyone?). It comes as a relief that CONFESSIONS OF A SEX MANIAC is only slightly below average thanks to budgetary restraints. Oddly, it was directed by the one and only Alan Birkinshaw, of KILLER'S MOON and INVADERS OF THE LOST GOLD infamy; you can tell it's one of his as it has the same scuzzy atmosphere.
  • A prominent architect, Sir Bernard Storm (Derek Royle), has accepted a lecture tour in the USA when he receives an offer, from Australia, to design a new leisure center. Unable to do the work himself he leaves it in the hands of his slacker assistant Henry (Roger LLoyd-Pack), assisted by their efficient secretary Hilary (Vicki Hodge). Henry, having trouble coming up with an idea for the design, in a drunken stupor hits upon the idea of modeling the building on the shape of a woman's breast. Naturally he then has to search for the perfect female breast. This sets the stage for a series of scenes in which women show their beasts and, often, have sex with Henry, before he finally realizes that Hilary is "perfection".

    The ladies are attractive and the movie will probably satisfy "soft porn" fans in that regard. Nudity is generally topless, with some full frontal shots. Unfortunately that is the only attraction of this movie. The principal problem is the performance of Roger Lloyd- Pack in the central role of Henry. He is one dimensional, his facial expression and vocal inflections are unchanged through out the film. Another "actor" of the genre (i.e. Robin Askwith) would at least grin from ear-to-ear when getting the goodies. Vicki Hodge is adequate in an undemanding role. Derek Royle delivers an energetic performance and lifts the film when on screen.

    Technical credits are OK but the film coloring seems to be deteriorating. The jazzy music score is a bit repetitive but to be expected in a low budget production.

    No one expects strong plots from a "soft porn" sex comedy, its all about how often and how quickly you can get the girls' "kit" off. The film works at this level. However there is very limited "comedy" in this sex comedy. As noted above the performances are limiting, plot thin and dialog simply lacks any spark.
  • stevecannell10 September 2006
    the single most pitiful, yawn-inducing waste of time it has been my misfortune to sit through,and i've sat thru some rubbish.

    Even in the genre of British sex films, which are generally terrible this really has been scraped of the bottom of a very large barrel.

    Its even worse than 'the amorous milkman' and 'the ups and down of a handyman'(and there BAD) and its as bad as 'emmanuelle in Soho' which is absolutely dire.

    please watch this!!

    i don't want anyone to suffer but would really love someone to find any redeeming qualities in this turd.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Searching round on Amazon UK for titles that a friend could add to his basket due to being interested in getting free postage after ordering the UK TV show Hime,I was surprised to stumble upon a British Sex Comedy starring future Sit Com star Roger Lloyd Pack,which led to me getting ready to discover what acts Pack had to confess to.

    The plot:

    Waving good bye to his boss Sir Bernard Storm as Storm heads out to Australia to gain a new building contract,architect Henry Milligan finds himself being left to make all of the designs for the potential Australian investors by himself.Hitting a dead end,Henry decides to go to bed,where he suddenly gets a dream about designing a building on the most perfect women's breasts that he has ever seen.Waking up,Milligan decides that he must go on a search for the most perfect women's breasts,in order to find the inspiration for his greatest design.

    View on the film:

    Made on an ultra-low budget, (with the bedroom scenes being filmed in the director's own house,and Benny Hill girl Cherri Gilham having not one,but 2 roles) co-writer/ (along with Alan Paz) director Alan Birkinshaw gives the film a huge dose a charm by soaking it in Derek Warne's and John Shakespeare's Folk-Pop score,which Birkinshaw emphasises with smooth tinted lighting and an easy going pace.

    Avoiding the route that most British Sex Comedies were taking at the time,Birkinshaw and Paz keep away from including a truly evil/bullish character in the film,with the writers instead showing Milligan and the company's secretary gradually warming to each other.Whilst the ending was something that I predicted about 40 minutes into the title,Birkinshaw makes sure that the movie never becomes dull by surrounding the film with beautiful naked women,and a naked Lloyd Pack!.

    Showing more of himself then any fan of his amazing TV work could ever have expected,Roger Lloyd Pack gives a fun performance as Henry Milligan,with Pack showing Milligan to be rather wayward and unsure on what direction his life should take,as Milligan discovers what only fools and horses know.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    SPOILERS INCLUDED Few British movies have managed to convey such a torrid atmosphere than Alan Birkinshaw's Killer's Moon. A 1978 tale of LSD crazed maniacs terrorising choirgirls complete with sex, violence and dialogue like `if we ever get out this alive, maybe we'll both live to be wives and mothers'. Once seen never forgotten seems a fitting epitaph to a movie that itself includes a ridiculous epitaph to a three legged dog. Killer's Moon was one of the last explicit British movies from the 70's nether world of naked starlets, Kensington gore, rag-bag scripts, fly by night distributors with addresses in Soho, and where sex and horror films seemed interchangeable. Indeed Birkinshaw's previous movie was a low budget sex movie, produced under his Rothernorth banner in 1974. Apparently Birkinshaw toyed with the titles Design For Lust and The Man Who Couldn't Get Enough before settling on Confessions of a Sex Maniac, a title that although barely relevant to the plot, must have been the envy of Birkinshaw's competitors. Sex Maniac was released in 1975 by David Grant's daring Oppidan company. The Kingpin of London's sexploitation distributors, Grant is chiefly remembered for releasing foreign fare like Succubus and Pussytalk. The movie itself is a half way interesting ditty involving an architect (Roger Lloyd Pack) working against the clock for his slaphead boss. Reading an architecture book and a Men's magazine Pack imagines buildings and a pair of breasts are synonymous to each other. With this burst of inspiration he sets out to design a building in the form of a pair of breasts, much to the astonishment of his bosses secretary (Vicki Hodge-in the most dreadful blond wig ever seen in a movie). Like in Killer's Moon you are never sure if the dialogue was meant for laughs or as preposterously pretentious as it sounds `you foolish creature the line between madness and genius is but a fragment of shallow minds'. In his quest for a model to inspire his building Pack attempts to pick up a woman who feels closer to animals than humans, before taking the obligatory walk around Soho flesh-pots checking out Diary of a Half Virgin, Wife Swapping French Style, Sex of their Bodies, Love Hungry Girls, Love Makers and The Reluctant Virgin in that order. Pack decides to place an ad in `something trendy, slightly underground...that all sorts of different birds will read' (a funny moment at the expense of London listings magazine Time Out) which leads to a parade of dolly birds ready to drop ‘em, among their number Monica Ringwald- The Sexplorer Herself. Like Birkinshaw's Killer's Moon, Confessions of a Sex Maniac is Sohoian brass and vulgar through and through. Sex scenes have never been more seedily shot or put together with such little rhyme or reason. There is a good argument for the whole movie existing solely for the lengthy scene where Pack inspects girl's breasts with a microscope and painful looking measuring instruments. Mirroring Killer's Moon's failure to remember who's been killed and how, at several points Sex Maniac looks to have been re-written to accommodate yet another naked starlet, the presence of Ava Cadell a graduate of hard-core shorts adds to the loop nature of these encounters. The latter half all but abandons its bust search premise in favour of haphazard seductions of some British sex film perennials (the repressed housewife, the hippy girl) all of whom fall for a man dressed like a down on his luck end of pier comedian. In a startlingly obvious conclusion the secretary with the bad wig provides the final itching to Pack's creative scratching. Several of the same crew worked on both Sex Maniac and Killer's Moon, making the two quite familiar viewing experiences. Both benefit from John Shakespeare and Derek Warne's curiously driven jazz music and cues that seem at times more suited to the horror movie. The late Arthur Lavis's camerawork however is dreadful, subsequently the colour of both films is an underlit dark blue. In the opening half of the film Pack laments losing his most attractive girlfriend Susan, but given that their love games are shot so dark to pass as silhouettes this has to be taken on word of mouth. Lloyd Pack has gone on to better things, namely comical roles as hopelessly dopey individuals in sitcoms. Here its more of the same, but his stone faced deadpanning seems out of place, for a man who gets more than his fare share he goes through the motions with the joy of a funeral pall-bearer. While scenes of Pack walking around a market leering at women's chests or making phone calls along the lines of `you don't understand I need breasts, I need breasts for my work' rank him alongside David Dixon in Escort Girls as the screens most repellent Jack the Lad. If nothing else Confessions of a Sex Maniac is a fitting companion piece to Killer's Moon, neither are one for the sophisticates, but you can't help but admit that as exploitation films they hit their targets where it matters. Amazingly Sex Maniac's budget seems to have extended to a helicopter, but unfortunately not enough to depict Pack's final peek design. Instead Alan Birkinshaw and Confessions of a Sex Maniac end as they always mean to go on- another soft core groping.
  • This film has just been revived on a local TV channel. I first saw it almost 30 years ago as the first part of a double bill, and I remember reluctantly enduring sitting through it because I wanted to see the second feature. Apart from this, the film was forgotten half an hour after leaving the cinema and has not returned to mind for over quarter of a century. Although the title of this TV feature sounded familiar, the film I remembered was so ghastly that I could not believe it was being allowed to escape from the studio again, but I taped it (it was an early morning feature) to check. Unfortunately it was the same film, and it was even worse than I remembered. I am therefore writing these warning comments in case there is any possibility of it being re-released in DVD format. It is a pity that, by its nature, your data base has to remain comprehensive, and works as bad as this cannot be allowed to slip into well deserved oblivion, but at least your readers deserve to be forewarned.

    Perhaps on reflection these comments are unnecessarily cruel, the basic concept of an architect designing a building to look like a woman's breast could probably be exploited effectively on a film. I even know a minesite where two well shaped piles of slag have been named by the workers as the memorial to a well endowed young woman who used to work at the site. Given a new script, much better acting and direction, and above all better photography, a remake of this film might make a successful lightweight comedy for today's TV - however there would be little if anything left to remind the viewer of this terrible forerunner..