Add a Review

  • This movie uses the poems of William McGonagall in form of theater and fantasies to tell the story of this most famous bad verse poet who completely left his day job to become a poet and perform for Queen Victoria.

    This movie is not for all tastes and definitely not a commercial type one, but if you can get into the subject and the style its hilarious!
  • Spike Milligan never got an even break. After he redefined comedy and pop culture on the radio with his scripts and performances on "The Goon Show," driving himself in the process to a nervous breakdown, he had to watch while his flabby "Goon Show" partner Peter Sellers became a film comedy superstar. By the time Milligan was well enough to try his own hand at film acting, it was already the 1970s and he had become passe.

    His biggest stab at cinematic glory, "The Great McGonagall," reveals he might have gotten out of the looney bin a little too early. Portraying a talentless Scottish poet, Milligan overacts his way through a punchy script he co-wrote with director Joseph McGrath. Sellers appears too, as Queen Victoria, and ironically the two former Goons - who used to play dozens of roles apiece each week on the radio - stick to single characters while other actors, including Victor Spinetti of "A Hard Day's Night" and "Help!," are given the task of performing multiple parts.

    It's a strange film that breaks down in the second half, much the way Milligan must have in real life. Still, the script offers hints of the great Goonish humor that launched a comedy revolution.

    "Knock, knock." Who says that? "A wee postman who canna reach the knocker," is the reply.

    There's strange bits of self-indulgence, too. Scenes are broken up by actors shoving pies in each other's faces, and at one point Milligan forgets his line, whereupon the cameras continue to run as the director and other actors coach him on what to say. It's very bizarre, and might even be fascinating, but for the fact that the story on screen is too slender to brook such diversions.

    Sellers, the one name actor in this film, is given little to do as Queen Victoria but perform reaction shots, and occasional witty lines like "Does anyone know a good solicitor" when her Prince Albert locks lips with a male messenger. The early 1970s were a dry period for Sellers, and "The Great McGonagall" was no exception. Albert wears a kilt but otherwise dresses like Hitler, a tiny joke which Milligan and the filmmakers beat into the ground. Valentine Dyall, a dead ringer for Ian McKellen, comes off best in a series of roles that include Alfred Lord Tennyson and a Zulu messenger.

    "The Great McGonagall" no doubt amused its makers, who thought it would be funny to send up a bad poet endlessly mocked by fate and society, but on screen it's no "Ed Wood" of poesy. Its too disjointed, too mean-spirited. It's the product of a man who has seemingly given up on life, and wants to hit his audience upside the head with its sordid futility. Milligan, a comic genius who never got his due on screen, had reason to be depressed, but you do not. Give this a miss.
  • Interesting in an history of British comedy sense. It has a Goon Show cast does Monty Python skit feel. Unfortunately, it takes a concept that would have been appropriate for a five minute skit and stretches it out an additional hour and a half. A fine supporting performance by Peter Sellers and sporadic gratuitous female nudity (while appreciated) are insufficient to save this from being an albeit quirky and unique but simultaneously mediocre and repetitive low budget comedy.

    As an aside, the video copy of this film that I purchased features a full cover picture of Peter Sellers and in the short synopsis on the reverse states that Sellers stars as The Great McGonagall. For the benefit of those of you who have yet to see the film, this is entirely incorrect. Peter Sellers plays the relatively small roll of Queen Victoria and Spike Milligan stars as McGonagall.
  • I don't like badmouthing films but this must be one of the worst I've ever seen, self-indulgent nonsense. Whilst I admire a lot of Spike Milligans work I cant help but feel that instead of giving us a straightforward telling of McGonagalls life (which certainly seems to have been entertaining enough) he decided to spoof it up to the point where it made no sense and as a viewer your sitting, wondering what on earth is going on and desperately looking for a storyline. It doesn't surprise me that the Director is the same guy who gave us the equally idiotic "The Magic Christian" but at least that had its moments and a top-notch cast, very amateurish, looks like its been filmed on a budget of £50 and on a cheap camcorder, what were they thinking! This is just a mess, only watch and indeed buy if your a completest and want to see all of Milligans/Sellers work. Simply not funny..
  • Spike Milligan was a beloved actor back in the day....and if you mention his name today, most Brits would recognize it. However, in the United States, Milligan never was especially well known. His radio and television antics were not brought to the States and no one would know he was a real institution in the 1950s-70s. As for me, I've seen him in a few skits from "The Goon Show" and as a guest star on "The Muppet Show"...and that's probably more than most Americans have seen. I didn't like what I saw, but to judge his talents only on my limited exposure would be unfair. He seemed to have a sense of humor that was an acquired taste...and I just didn't get to see enough of him to have much of an opinion. Sadly, in watching "The Great McGonagall", I still felt as if I must need to see him more, as I simply didn't enjoy his style of comedy and also had a bit of a hard time with understanding much of what he said (it really could have used closed captions). So, my advice is that if you are unfamiliar with his work, skip the film. It just isn't a very good introduction to his work due to the captions and that he and Peter Sellers only play one role in the movie--whereas what made both famous was their playing many different roles on TV and radio. It's just not a good introduction to his talents and I found the film to be tedious.

    By the way, in this politically correct world, you should be aware that there are some black-face routines in the film.
  • Sadly neglected and forgotten gem of a movie showcasing the incredible and anarchic humour of legend Spike Milligan. Spike plays the eponymous hero of the movie, the Great Mcgonagall, the worlds worst poet who "gave up his job as an unemployed weaver to follow the muse." The gloriously inventive non-structure of the movie eschews any sense of order and usurps all accepted movie conventions. The action taking place, for the most part, in a rambling old theatre. Indeed, the whole production has a stagey feel and the viewer almost feels as if they are part of an insane scatter gun rehearsal filled with ad libbing and uncorrected mistakes. In one scene Spike and the wonderful Victor Spinetti, who appears in numerous roles, do several takes much to the annoyance of very real director Joseph McGrath.

    There's awful poetry, a cross dressing Peter Sellers as Queen Victoria (favourite quote, "shit, we are not amused!"), Prince Albert replete with Nazi uniform and Hitler Moustache, and gags galore. Spike's comedic genius was sadly neglected in cinema which is a travesty when one considers the hilarious calibre of original jokes here, delivered with a malicious and surreal glee. For further proof of Spike's incredible talent hunt down a copy of The Bed-sitting Room.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is one of those very odd films where you may find yourself looking at it then thinking "What was that?" when it's all over. British comic Spike Milligan plays the lead, the real life Scottish poet, going from one piece of so called performance art to another, accompanied by Peter Sellers as Queen Victoria. From what I could gather, Sellers seemingly is playing another performer portraying the queen, although synopses of the film don't seem to indicate that. I'm not about to research the film further to prove that. It was just far too weird to imagine him playing the real queen as his performance is far too burlesque to indicate otherwise.

    While I've seen other British films that had similar looks ("Yellowbeard" and the remake of "Baron Munchhausen" instantly come to mind), I can't say that out of these films that this theme really works, "Baron Munchhausen" being the exception. The film doesn't easily allow the viewer to realize what's fantasy or what's reality, and it's a crude look at the Victorian age, although fascinating in its crudeness infrequently. I definitely believe that this is not the type of film that everyone can enjoy, and it is very low on my list of Sellers' films, even though it's Milligan's vehicle, not his. I've enjoyed the real Monty Python films much more than this obvious take off that the creators of that British TV series and few films apparently found flattering. Just too weird for my tastes, although I can appreciate the attempts in trying a new style.
  • I came to THE GREAT MCGONAGALL first because I'm a big Peter Sellers fan, especially of his earlier b/w films. Secondly, I've been a fan of McGonagall's "poems" for decades - I've carried around his collected works for years and years. But this film is just a mess, not funny save for a moment or two. Now let me say I love British humor, and I also love absurdist/surreal films (THE BED SITTING ROOM and BEDAZZLED are excellent). I'll also admit I don't know much about Spike Milligan, other than he's a comedian. The film itself is basically a series of skits, many of which just don't come off for a US audience. Milligan's Scottish accent is difficult enough to understand, but most of the vocals sound like the actors are speaking in a tunnel (I know the film was shot on the cheap). And perhaps the print has not aged well, much of it was dark and hard to see at times. Sellers is barely here, although he's billed as one if not THE star. A better film would have been an actor simply onstage reciting the poems - they're hilariously bad.
  • This is the film that "Wind From the East" so desperately wanted to be. Deconstructs itself before your very eyes. Hilarious and mystifying. Spike Milligan and Joe McGrath were made for each other. And Peter Sellers is on board too. I find it hard to believe this classic of the Cinema of the Absurd is so little known. But then so is McGrath -- the Edgar G. Ulmer of British comedy. While Richard Lester is more associated with "The Goon Shpw" -- thanks to "The Running Jumping and Standing Still Film," it's McGrath who conveys the true Goonish sense of intellectual lunacy. The fact that the entire film is shot inside of a theater -- used to suggest the whole world -- is especially novel and fascinating.
  • This is an update on my June 2003 comments which I had I posted based on my recollections of the videotape that I'd hired in the early 80's - but which I hadn't seen anywhere since.

    So I was surprised to see the DVD listed for release in Australia in October (2004) and immediately ordered a copy. The text on the back of the DVD continues to mislead the viewer by referring to the film as "a high camp farce" and "cult British spoof". However it's clear after finding out more from the internet about McGonagall that the film is all based on the poet's autobiography - most of the circumstances are the same, they're just presented in a slightly absurd manner (but not much more absurd than the poetry itself). The poetry in the film is definitely the original McGonagall.

    It's still a very funny film, and even before I found out that McGonagall was a real poet I appreciated the tragedy and pathos of the character. I think it was Spike Milligan who said that someone, or something, suffers in every joke that's ever been funny.

    The DVD quality is very good considering the low price - so I'm hoping that Spike Milligan's "The Bed Sitting Room" can be made available too. Spike Milligan and William McGonagall had a lot in common in regard to their ability to make people laugh - but that was exactly the reaction Spike wanted, whereas William struggled to be taken seriously as a dramatic performance poet.
  • jvframe22 June 2003
    McGonagall is presented as a believably bad poet - someone you could expect to outsell all other Scottish poets combined, simply because his work is so mind-bogglingly banal.

    This is an extremely charming, outrageously funny and also tragic film. There is no doubt that some will not be able to tolerate the amount of pathos generated by a good and simple man (like Nathan in Steve Martin's "The Jerk") who just wanted to follow his heart and do his best in life.

    McGonagall puts all his heart and soul into his renditions (each one beginning with blood-curdling moan) and yet he is mercilessly scoffed at by the cognoscenti.

    McGonagall's fictional poems will haunt you for life, and you'll never be able to see a simple object like a cow or a bridge without being tempted to burst into a long "Ooooooooooooooh!". Peter Sellers also makes a charming brief appearance as Queen Victoria.
  • Firstly I ought to say that apart from me its hard to see who this film will appeal to. To really enjoy it i think that you have to love the real poet Mcgonagall (otherwise you will miss the hilarious fact that all the poetry read in the film is quite real and written seriously) and have to appreciate the very surreal pythonesque humor (such as Prince Albert being dressed as Hitler from the waist up). If your one of the dozen people who fit into both of these categories you will adore the film as I did. However I must say that the best part of it was just listening to Spike Milligan (and Queen Victoria!) reading Mcgonagall's poetry. Surprisingly given the absolute madness of the film the ending is actually very touching.
  • This film is totally hilarious. The film is a loose adaptation of the life of William "Topaz" Mcgonagall, said to be the worst poet circa 1890. Milligan is excellent, playing the role with great determination. Spinetti is hilarious in at least 5 different roles. McGrath uses guerrilla filming tactics in his direction, sort of similar to his earlier film "The Magic Christian" also with Sellers, and Milligan. Peter Sellers pulls a sort of "Mouse that Roared" revival, this time playing the role of Queen Victoria. The VHS copy that I own is at least 25 years old. Hopefully Anchor Bay, Crtierion, or some other company will take note of the value of this film, and give it the release that it deserves.
  • There is a classic volume edited by Wyndham Lewis and another entitled "The Stuffed Owl: An Anthology of Bad Verse". The book illustrated the worst poets and poetry (in the opinion of the editors) in modern English literature (Shakespeare and his contemporaries, and Medieval masters like Chaucer, were not included). Incredibly the editors not only included poets who were deservedly forgotten (the bland and self-satisfied Martin Tupper, or Edward Foote, who footnoted his poems to verify what he meant, or Poet Laureates like Alfred Austin) some of the great poets slipped too. Wordsworth, Poe, Byron, Tennyson, Longfellow (for "Excelcior") were in the book. I recommend it for people who want to enjoy the pratfalls of poesy (which can be very odd indeed).

    Oddly enough William MacGonigal is not included in the collection. Yet he is generally chosen as the example of the worst poet of Victorian Britain. He was the only one who never realized it. He was a dreamer - one day he was in bed and suddenly realized he wanted to be a poet...a great poet. He then proceeded to write poetry, and would do so until he died. There was absolutely nothing anyone of his serious contemporaries ever saw in his work to grant it merit. He certainly was not in the same category of Tennyson or Wordsworth or Byron (despite their occasional lapses). Yet he actually tried to become poet laureate. Given that (after Tennyson died in 1892) Alfred Austin finally got chosen (Wilde, Kipling, and William Morris were not considered politically correct enough for different reasons - Austin was a good Tory policy propagandist), MacGonigal could have served that political occasion job. He would have enjoyed it.

    Today, actually, his poetry sells well (some say it sells better than Tennyson, Matthew Arnold, or Robert Browning). It has a beguiling beat, likened to calypso in rhythm. His fairly simple line of English vocabulary is quick to grasp among people struggling to learn our language. And (unlike Tennyson and most of the others) a movie was made about his life. Spike Milligan finally got the lead role in his career (remember "Postman's Knock" - I suppose not) that was worth remembering. Sellers was given an interesting cameo as Queen Victoria. Not a great film, but an interesting one.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    McGonagall was a great poet. Of this there is no doubt. His verse has been in print since the day of his death in 1902. It is memorable, quotable, and infinitely more pleasurable and entertaining to read than anything by Ezra Pound or William Carlos Williams, whose ridiculous works are forced on students by pernicious academics.

    This film fails to do McGonagall justice, but anything to do with McGonagall merits the highest possible marks. Although Milligan and the rest seem to be trying hard, it strikes me that they have just thrown this performance together at short notice, without giving their subject sufficient attention. Sellers is OK, but the rest really aren't. So what ? This isn't a recommendation, and I wouldn't watch it twice, except after a very long interval, but I feel obliged to advise you to watch it, if you haven't already. There's a highly rewarding snippet featuring a surprising dancing lady.

    Oh yes, McGonagall will be remembered for many a long day, and his style defeats those who attempt to compose poems in his unique and particular way. One thing on which I want to dwell, it is a shame he died too soon before he could be given a Nobel.