Add a Review

  • THE INTERNECINE PROJECT is an intriguing little thriller made as a collaboration between the UK and West Germany. It's one of those films that nobody mentions anymore, but which provides a few surprises and nice elements for film fans. The unusual plot itself is a highlight, as this is a film which explores the meaning of the word 'internecine' (mutually destructive, as it happens).

    James Coburn plays an anti-hero, a politician with more than a few skeletons in his closet. In order to tie off some loose ends, he sets a plot in action to kill off people who know a little too much about him. The thrills come from seeing said plot play out, and wondering whether he'll succeed or not.

    The spy elements of the storyline give this some decent, Cold War-era paranoia shudders. The cast is very well picked; even Lee Grant is an asset, although her character - a feminist journalist - is extraneous to the storyline, although she does have a jaw-dropping encounter with the chauvinistic Coburn. Harry Andrews continues to delight in his later years, Ian Hendry is memorably twitchy, and the likes of Julian Glover and Keenan Wynn prop up the cast. There's little to dislike and much to enjoy about this thought-provoking thriller.
  • This largely forgotten film from the darkest days of the British film industry probably deserves to be better known, if only for the fact that it manages to make a long sequence in which one man sits alone in a room waiting for the phone to ring quite suspenseful.

    James Coburn plays Robert Elliott, a former secret agent who must erase all evidence of his dirty past before taking a job as adviser to the US president. That past comes in the form of four former colleagues – nervy diabetic Ian Hendry, misogynistic cat-lover Harry Andrews, scientist Michael Jayston and call-girl Christiane Kruger. Eliot hits upon the ingenious idea of getting each of his intended victims to do the deed for him, leaving him completely unconnected to the murders. It's a fairly unique idea, and quite well-handled with some quirky characters thrown in (not of least of which is Harry 'A *woman*, Sir?' Andrews), and it is to writer Barry Levinson's credit that he manages to stretch what is a fairly thin plot over a reasonable running time without losing the viewer's interest.

    The ending belongs in a James Bond movie – although given the recent murder of a dissident Russian journalist, maybe that's not quite true – but it is a delicious pay-off and a fitting fate for an urbane character who is totally lacking in scruples.
  • I'm amazed that THE INTERNECINE PROJECT has received less than 100 votes . I saw it a couple of times in the early 1980s and despite not seeing it for almost 25 years it's still lodged in my mind as being a clever thriller . Perhaps I shall never watch it in case it's not as good as I remember . The plot centres around former secret agent Robert Elliot ( Played suavely by James Coburn in one of his best roles) gaining a White House promotion , just the first step in a long and successful political career . There's just one thing and that is there's several people who know about Elliot's past and Elliot can't allow his dirty secrets to be revealed by anyone

    I won't reveal the plot but it's smart and there's a twist at the end . But for me the best part of the movie is where Elliot visits the home of military veteran Albert Parsons played by Harry Andrews . Parsons and his collection of cats warmly greet Elliot , but it's obvious by his mannerism that Elliot has something on his mind :

    " We've got a problem "

    " A problem sir ? " asks Parsons

    " It's to do with a woman "

    Parsons is shocked " A WOMAN SIR ? "

    Elliot rubs his chin and studies Albert " She's a sort of high class whore "

    By now Parsons is having convulsions and spitting his hatred " THEY'RE ALL WHORES THE WHOLE LOT OF THEM , YOU CAN'T TRUST ANY THEM SIR , NOT ANY OF THEM "

    Hmmm I wonder if Albert Parsons is a repressed homosexual ?
  • Ingenious British-made corporate thriller with an impressive cast well-versed in this sort of thing – James Coburn, Keenan Wynn, Ian Hendry, Michael Jayston and Harry Andrews; Lee Grant provides both a feminist viewpoint and a romantic partner for Coburn. The plot involves Coburn’s rise in the political stakes, abetted by ruthless bigwig Wynn; however, he needs to put his shady past behind him and, to this end, organizes an intricate scheme by which his four former associates will eliminate one another on the same night!

    Those expecting action, comedy, sex and colorful scenery a' la Coburn’s “Flint” pictures will be sorely disappointed by this low-key, intelligent but humorless character-driven piece – filmed against drab European settings (albeit by the great Geoffrey Unsworth); composer Roy Budd, another genre fixture, delivers an appropriately moody score. Still, the murder sequences themselves (with Coburn bemusedly ticking away each carefully-timed step of his plan) – particularly Andrews’ vicious shower murder of the Christiane Kruger character and the hesitation at carrying out his part of the bargain by the typically angst-ridden Hendry – generate the requisite amount of suspense during the film’s second half.

    While Grant’s reporter character seems an intrusion at first, her presence (or, rather, Coburn’s callous mistreatment of her) eventually threatens to jeopardize his ‘mission’ – on finally getting wise to his machinations, she’s willing to suppress her affections and expose him for what he is! The film, however, provides a delicious twist ending, which sees the over-confident Coburn getting his come-uppance – even if the audience is clearly rooting for him – at his moment of glory (by the person he least expected it from)!

    Regrettably, this is only available via a reportedly substandard pan-and-scan R2 DVD; then again, I did watch it in this aspect ratio myself – and dubbed in Italian to boot!
  • In one of his most eye-opening roles, James Coburn plays a US diplomat in England who gets hired to be one of the president's cabinet members. But several people know too much about his sordid past, so he decides to make sure that they don't reveal anything. So, he devises a plan to have each of them kill each other. But it turns out that they're ahead of him.

    "The Internecine Project" has a very '70s look, with the pre-digital secret technology (which, combined with London's dreary nocturnal environs, gives the movie a more mysterious feel). Seeing how this movie came out during the Watergate era, I wonder whether it was playing off of people's growing suspicion of the government. But even if it wasn't, it still comes out really well. It does more to show what a great actor James Coburn was. Lee Grant, Harry Andrews and Ian Hendry also star.
  • James Coburn is a slick white collar heavy in this twisty thriller, scripted by future directors Barry Levinson ("Rain Man"), who also produced, and Jonathan Lynn ("Clue"). Coburn again projects incredible cool as Robert Elliot, a "professor" who has a major opportunity for advancement in the government. The catch is, he can't afford to have anybody alive who's got knowledge of his past. There are four of these people, and Elliot arranges for all of them to kill each other over the course of a single night. Despite his intricate planning, things don't always go that smoothly.

    The excellent cast is the major draw of this film, capably directed by Ken Hughes ("Chitty Chitty Bang Bang"). It's very well paced and sometimes reasonably suspenseful, with a story that might not stand up to a lot of scrutiny, but does solidly entertain for its duration. Another asset is the eclectic soundtrack composed by Roy Budd ("Get Carter" '71).

    Coburn is fun to watch in the role of an anti-hero, a man who initially is taken aback at the idea of eliminating these skeletons in his closet, but quickly makes up his mind to be cold-blooded about the whole affair. Lee Grant is fine (and looks very nice, to boot) as the aggressive, feminist journalist with whom he was once involved. Ian Hendry is wonderfully antsy as the diabetic Alex, Christiane Kruger is delectably sexy as Christina, Julian Glover has a good, brief role as a TV host, and Keenan Wynn is endlessly amusing as usual as tycoon E.J. Farnsworth. But the shining star of the production is Harry Andrews as a masseur named Bert Parsons. The character is an angry misogynist, and the viewer may be intrigued and wonder just how this character came to be this way.

    Overall, good entertainment. Nothing special, but there are much worse ways to spend an hour and a half.

    Seven out of 10.
  • The Internecine Project is a devious plan in which the people who were part of a spy operation are now in the way and become unwitting participants in a plan where they kill each other. The idea is that if you took a 60's era Cold War spy and appointed him or her, in this case James Coburn who's now a suave professor of economics who is a guest on TV news interviews for his views, to a top government post in the 70's (or beyond for that matter), that person would face a thorough background investigation, prompting him or her to eliminate anyone with any damaging knowledge that would derail the appointment. It seems like an extreme solution to the problem, but good enough to make a movie about. One wonders how many political appointees today have had to think up there own internecine projects in order to assure their Senate confirmations. The movie is mostly about the contrived plot and seems trivial and weak, held together more by the locations and some nice background music. Before the ball gets rolling Coburn shares neat scenes with each person on his list that build up the characters. Lee Grant's part as an idealist reporter who's in love with Coburn but doesn't trust his methods, doesn't add much, but Keenan Wynne has a few good scenes as one of Coburn's ruthless business and political connections.
  • vostf24 October 2011
    I am going on with the ordeal of discovering all the bad movies Roy Budd scored. Here James Coburn has to cope with a much lower budget (and fewer talented people) than Michael Caine in The Marseille Contract or The Black Windmill. It shows, painfully.

    How would such a linear protracted flimsy story make it into a movie script in the first place? The premise, that is the whole movie, is in the title. A clumsy prologue and epilogue are tacked to the project's storyline which actually would have been OK as a tongue-in-cheek 50-minute Avengers episode. Instead they go for a dead serious 70s dark conspiracy flick with nothing mysterious or hidden in it. Nothing makes sense, so director Ken Hughes is at a loss for tension. Never mind suspense.

    The actors did OK though, quite a feat with such dull material.
  • When the fabulous Lee Grant tells James Coburn "You used to be such a nice guy" her memory obviously goes back a long since everybody in this film acts out of the worst of possible motives.

    Escapist fun set in a glamorous world of golf courses and suites at the Dorchester, Coburn's co-stars are a succulent bunch, presided over by Keenan Wynn's Mr Big in the form of the Vice-President of International Oil. Ian Hendry perspires ever more than he did in 'Get Carter'; while without giving too much of the plot Harry Andrews proves the joker in the pack and Michael Jayston cleverly gives himself the last word.
  • Harvard economics professor James Coburn is about to be appointed to a presidential board. Industrialist and political power Keenan Wynn warns the ex-spy that there should be no skeletons coming out of his closet, like the four operatives he had working as spies for him in Europe. So Coburn works out an elaborate plan in which they all wind up killing each other.

    It's the sort of thriller that you watch, waiting for something to go wrong. It's all pitched at such an icy, manipulative level, that you wind p hoping something will go wrong, but none of the people involved really seem worth saving. Only Lee Grant, a news reporter and occasional lover of Coburn, who knows nothing about any of these shenanigans, seems decent, and she is on screen a total of maybe five minutes.

    It's co-written by Jonathan Lynn.
  • Although not a blockbuster, "The Internecine Project" is an outstanding European political thriller from 1973 that has deserved much more attention from critics and movie buffs! Directed by Ken Hughes ("Casino Royale"), this British-German co-production tells the intrigues of corrupt London scientist and former secret agent Robert Elliot who is about to become the personal consultant of the American president. The only problem are four witnesses of his corrupt and dirty past who could break his career, so Elliot has to get rid of them one by one...

    Now that's where the big plan starts - Elliot directs the assassination of all four people - a politician, a scientist, a call-girl and a women-hating psychopath - by sending all of them out to kill another one of them in one night while he controls every single action by phone in his office. This all happens in the second half of the movie and causes a nail-biting suspense and hardcore thrill that leads to the very surprising bitter ending...

    The direction is great and the dark, and the disturbing settings (the plot mostly takes place at night and in dark rooms) adds much atmosphere to this great thriller. Roy Budd's menacing, "psychological" score with elements of spy music, blaxploitation funk, ethnic sounds and dark cool jazz like his "Get Carter" success is brilliant and don't need to hide behind the seventies' works of Ennio Morricone, Lalo Schifrin or Jerry Goldsmith. The cast is superb as well, with James Coburn as devilish Professor Elliot and a very good supporting cast of Lee Grant, Harry Andrews, Ian Hendry, Keenan Wynne and young German actress Christiane Krueger.

    If you ever have the occasion to watch this breath-taking thriller don't hesitate, sit down on your couch and take a ride! The film has also been released as "The Black Panther" and with the very simple title "G" in Germany.
  • James Coburn (gaunt, and with a thick mustache) plays an American diplomat and future adviser to the US President who needs his former life as a secret agent permanently scrubbed; unfortunately, he has four acquaintances in London (a civil servant, a prostitute, a thuggish masseur and a scientist doing research on a device that kills with a high-frequency sound) who know too much about his past. He orchestrates a plan to have the four unwittingly eliminate each other, though a sideline romance with former-flame and uptight writer Lee Grant might be his undoing. Very clever thriller from screenwriters Barry Levinson (who also produced) and Jonathan Lynn, adapting Mort W. Elkind's book "Internecine", though it does take a while to get this plot into motion (and involves a great deal of telephone ringing). Director Ken Hughes is attracted to intricate details and technicalities, but a snappy pace doesn't seem to be his thing. At least one of the killings (with the victim in the shower) is especially ungainly, however the film isn't terribly violent or bloody--Hughes and his writers are more interested in plot development than circumstance. Good performances all around, including Grant as the lover. Grant matches up well with Coburn, and she has a funny, natural reaction when he tells her she should be working on something more her speed--a cookbook. **1/2 from ****
  • James Coburn thriller made in the shadow of Watergate. Coburn is involved in industrial espionage rather than political, working for the military industrial complex itself rather than the government. he is ordered to liquidate his own spy network in preparation for elevation to high office within the US political structure The mechanics of carrying out this task involve persuading the unwitting agents to kill each other, a plan which requires careful synchronisation, which Coburn monitors by unanswered phone calls of varying duration. In this way it is another Coburn movie which attempts to imitate Steve McQueen's "The Thomas Crown Affair" (as did "Dead Heat On A Merry-go-round" except with murders instead of a heist). The problem is that there are no characters to really sympathise or identify with. Coburn is a misguided Machiavellian character who apparently once had some morals (at least Lee Grant seems to think so) but who has sold his soul to the military industrial complex. And his victims are people who have sold out or betrayed confidences for money. Also, although it's all quite cleverly done, with a twist at the end, it is lacking in any real "action" or "movement" (a shortcoming Steve McQueen attempted to overcome with the beach buggy scenes in TTCA).
  • The movie begins (and ends) like a political movie,a la Pakula .But if the "hero" is blamed for butchering democracy ,the essential is a thriller ,some very special "domino theory" .To get rid of some people who become embarrassing,the professor (a spy) ,pushes the "divide and rule" concept to its absolute limits and ,although completely implausible (all works out much too well) , displays an implacable logic in his sinister plans.Probably not great,but not derivative,and rather gripping.

    Main objection: Lee Grant's character is almost useless and her would be feminist journalist is only decorative.
  • James Coburn is quite effective in this action thriller. He is "Prof. Elliot", about to become a high ranking government advisor. Snag is, he has quite a past - and so must devise a cunning plan to ensure that all those privy to his dirty laundry are eliminated. The plot utilises quite a clever domino-style effect. Those doing the killing don't know who is instructing them, nor that they won't last much longer themselves, and the pace from director Ken Hughes is well managed eliciting a good effort from both Coburn and from the usually reliable Keenan Wynn ("Farnsworth"). What makes this work is the way the plot draws us in. It's not so much that people are dropping like flies - we neither know them nor care about them - it's more the sheer cleverness of his plan, and I was quietly hoping he would succeed... Unfortunately, the quality of dialogue - an early outing for Barry Levinson - doesn't really add much to the film. It's all just a little bit bland, and I could have been doing with more on screen time from Coburn. Still, it's an interesting and new take on a political thriller that I quite enjoyed for 90 minutes.
  • "The Internecine Project" is a fascinating film which, in light of recent political scandals, doesn't seem all that farfetched today. Professor Elliot (James Coburn) is being nominated for a top government position. But he has a dirty past which could derail this nomination. So, he decides to clean up any loose ends...specifically to kill off four people who worked for him in the past and know how ruthless he can be. In other words, he's killing loyal people who put their lives on the line for him. But he's clever (too clever) and decides to do it in a way that will leave him blameless...he'll get the four to kill each other!

    This is an interesting story. I think the ending, though downbeat, wasn't bad...it was just HOW this ending occurred seemed a bit silly and hard to swallow. If you can look past this, however, you still have a decent story...one that, sadly, doesn't seem all that unlikely.
  • James Coburn is a an American diplomat in London, offered a new job in an advisory role for the US president. The problem is he has a shady past, where he was a spy for the American government. Only four people have the details to the skeletons in his closet, so he sets out to have them killed. He comes up with a plot to have the four of them kill each other, without it being traced back to him.

    Very subtle, nothing spectacular, but for ninety-minutes of entertainment, this one delivers. You are on the edge of your seat right through, first making sense of the plan, and then watching it unfold, and waiting for it to fall apart and turn on the former-spy, because surely, it has to, you would think! Coburn is excellent, as are the supporting cast. This little gem is forgotten today. I had never even heard of it until I caught it on the Legend channel. I would certainly watch again, and would love to have it in my collection.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    When one card falls, all cards fall, and that's the goal of rising government official James Coburn in this sly political drama. He is determined to wipe out for government assassins who know too much about him, and that means having them kill each other so he is not directly linked. It's scary and sly and ingenious, and it's James Coburn at his absolute best. It's also time sensitive which is why he has to set it up so his lover Lee Grant doesn't figure things out, although as she begins to get suspicious, she comments "A little fascism can go a long way."

    One of the writers of the script was future hot shot director Barry Levinson, and it's one of the best director all efforts of Ken Hughes. When the murders are indeed committed, they are brutal and painful and terrifying, with one in particular (death by the presence of a piercing painful sound) quite scary.

    I wasn't really crazy about the ending which seems like some key element was deleted, but with terrific performances by Keenan Wynn, Harry Andrews, Michael Jayston and Ian Hendry, the viewer's attention is sure to be held. There is also some great location footage of London in the early 1970s, and for a good majority of the film, everything seems to be running smoothly. Perhaps the issue was in the editing room, but unfortunately, that affects the final product which ultimately affects the final rating.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I mean that. Stupid movie, and JUST that. Well filmed, well acted. Okay pretty poor sound editing so the music and some action is too hot and in a dialogue-driven film you often cannot tell what exactly everyone is saying (sometimes you are supposed to get whole sentences Coburn is saying as overheard on the phone!)

    But mostly, just a stupid plot, and people who are supposed to act brilliant are very dumb. Even the big end twist to kill Coburn is sort of what you expect everyone to do and that he doesn't see secret-government-death-scientist planning something very obscure as a safety measure seems really dumb on the part of the super brilliant anti-hero of the movie.

    But he's dumb otherwise. In principle, having some secret spy ring to get you into power but they know "too much" and there's no plan to get rid of them? I mean, I guess? Badly written movie never seriously sold us on what all these people did, left lots of characters (the reporter esp) sorta there for no reason, and why they all must be killed vs paid off or vaguely threatened since they have been doing all this for years or decades with no problems already?

    As happens too much in movies and TV, none of these people actually watch movies or TV or read the paper. There's little more horrible and pursued by the police than: death. The more complicated the murder plots, the less likely you get away with it.

    But at least Coburn is a total idiot the whole time. He has this complex plot with ring codes but they go to his office. Which has a big map and he has lists of people to kill and how. In. His. Office. In his apartment. Nothing is in secret unknowable locations. No burn bags. Etc.

    At least he also breaks with the plan so talks to people on the phone, goes to people's apartments in time to watch them die. At this point he could have just gone around stabbing everyone and saved himself the cost of the big lucite map of London.

    Stupid, boring, pointless. Ultimately literally pointless as everyone (ish) is dead and few of them seem to ultimately matter in the greater scheme of the world so... okay. That happened.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Having seen this movie only once before, in the late 1980s, I looked forward to seeing if it held up as well as I perceived it as a youngster. Frankly, it doesn't really. There are solid performances all round, with Ian Hendry taking the honours for his turn as the nervy Alex. But the cast's abilities are ultimately hindered by the script. For example Lee Grant has no material with which to improve upon the cliched, weak woman created by so many male scriptwriters of the era. (Did nobody in showbusiness back then watch The Avengers??!!) Meanwhile Bert Parsons' (Harry Andrews) misogyny is too cheesily scripted - his attitude needed subtlety and some backstory to be understandable and believable.

    Nonetheless the audience is drawn in to Elliot's (James Coburn) diabolical scheme but the flaws of the movie's central idea become quickly obvious. His small network of mutually-unaquainted spies are clearly amateurs and, as such, hardly people you would rely upon to act as competent "Black Op" executors, with the cool detachment and efficiency to adhere to the strictly prescribed schedule under stressful conditions, let alone commit their first exterminations. They accept their deadly assignments without suggesting that Elliot himself would be better suited to carry out the killings. In partial fairness, though, we do see Alex start to "bottle out" during his own murderous mission.

    The killings themselves are nicely staged - and the "mechanics" of this is essentially the film's best aspect and "USP". However, other than relying on Ian Hendry's usual superb acting abilities, there's little sense of tension, much less suspense. The "mechanics" are rather too, well, "mechanical"!

    The shortcomings are lifted somewhat by Roy Budd's laudable score which, perhaps inevitably, is similar to his work on Get Carter.

    The twist in the denouement is delicious and we cheer Elliot's final scene. It also leaves a chilling aftertaste, which may have been intentional by the writers. As Elliot drops the deadly "weapon" at the feet of a gathering crowd of onlookers, it could so easily have been picked up by one of them... a la the real world Salisbury Novichok outrage of 2018.

    Overall, then, The Internecine Project is enjoyably frivolous - ironically somewhat akin to the aforementioned The Avengers. And as a fan of that show, my score is probably more generous than this movie deserves. If it fails, it's because it was clearly intended as a "serious", albeit slightly outlandish, work. It presents us with a movie very much of its era (though thankfully without the usual appalling clothing fashions!) - in both positive and negative senses. I am not generally disposed to remaking movies but there is a nub of a great, intriguing idea here, which could so easily be refined and improved upon.
  • henry8-317 December 2022
    Top economics professor James Coburn is up for a top US government post, but needs to remove 4 people who know about his dodgy past. He pulls together a cunning plan whereby the 4 will kill each other without involving him. Matters are complicated further by the appearance of his ex lover and investigative journalist Lee Grant.

    Enjoyable enough, rather stark thriller featuring a fine array of British character actors lining up to potentially bite the bullet, with Lee Grant providing solid realistic support, albeit her relationship with Coburn who shifts between anger and flirting in seconds, seems not quite right.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is a fantastic 1970's thriller set in England staring James Coburn in one of his best roles as Robert Elliot, an economics expert who is doing a little dirty work on the side for the US government. The motive of industrial espionage is interesting and this movie unlike most similarly plotted movies of the time does not focus on cold war paranoia.

    When presented with an opportunity to progress in his role as a government fixer he is required to completely detach himself from the network of low level spies he has recruited. Unfortunately for them this means they all have to be killed. The clever script has Coburn arrange for all his contacts to murder each other. As none of them know each other he is able to play on their various fears and weaknesses to coax, cajole and blackmail them into submission. His elaborate plan involves strict timing with each of the the victims phoning Coburn at set times over the duration of one evening while he sits in his office ticking off the preplanned murder sequence he has typed up. Of course the plan doesn't quite work out and the film ends with a superb twist.

    The only fault i have with the movie is the presence of Lee Grant. Her character (as a journalist) is introduced to show that she once had a relationship with Coburns character, that they still have feelings for each other and that he once may have been a more wholesome person before becoming corrupted. However her characters continual interjections as she investigates Elliot only serve to slow down the story.

    DVD releases in both the UK and the US have failed to do this movie justice even the most recent "special edition". The low number of reviews posted reflects the relative obscurity of a movie that deserves a wider audience.
  • Woodyanders28 August 2012
    Warning: Spoilers
    Shrewd and unscrupulous former secret agent Prof. Robert Elliot (a marvelously ruthless portrayal by the always commanding and charismatic James Coburn) gets a chance to become a top adviser to the President of the United States. However, Elliot must devise a plan to eliminate four people who know about his shady past in order to achieve this goal. Capably directed by Ken Hughes, with a gripping and ingenious script by Barry Levinson and Jonathan Lynn, a steady pace, lively cinematography by Geoffrey Unsworth, a gritty, serious, no-nonsense tone, a robust and rousing score by Roy Budd, a substantial amount of tension, several startling moments of savage violence (a shower murder set piece is especially harsh and shocking), a tough and cynical central theme about the vicious extremes some people will resort to so they can acquire true power, and a real corker of a surprise ending, this unjustly overlooked item sizes up as one extremely effective and engrossing affair. The first-rate cast helps matters a whole lot: Lee Grant as pesky reporter Jean Robertson, Harry Andrews as brutish misogynist Albert Parsons, Ian Hendry as the antsy and squeamish Alex Hellman, Michael Jayston as the reluctant David Baker, Christiane Kruger as the sultry Christina Larsson, and Keenan Wynn as evil businessman E.J. Farnsworth. Moreover, the cold stream-lined efficiency of Elliot's brilliantly diabolical scheme gives this picture an extra potent and chilling edge. Recommended viewing.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I admit I'd never heard of this film until today, even though it has a great cast led by James Coburn.

    Coburn plays Robert Elliot, a former agent hoping to get a bigger job in Govt circles. He however has to eliminate his past, and hatches a plan to get his former colleagues to murder each other.

    The plan is pretty ingenious, and he ticks all the boxes until they have all indeed killed each other. Unfortunately someone knows about the plan and before the film ends, Elliot too is dead.

    Being a British filmed this has a largely UK cast, which is a great thing, Ian Hendry as always is excellent as the snivelling Hellman, Christiane Kruger is also good as the prostitute Christina.

    As a footnote it's while making this movie Coburn took time out to appear on the cover of the "Band on the Run" LP by Paul McCartney and Wings.
  • g-hbe10 December 2022
    A British film with a mainline American as its star and solid backup from a range of decent British actors including the excellent Harry Andrews. The plot concerns an American politician (James Coburn) who learns that he's in line for a step up to a much higher-profile job, but needs to clear out the 'skeletons in his closet' before anyone starts looking at his affairs. This means drastic action - even murder - will be necessary. To avoid any traceable direct connection with evil deeds, he persuades others to do the dirty work, but how does he know these people will keep silent? Much of the running time is taken up by the answer to this question. Good performances from all concerned, and the dependable Harry Andrews is (as usual) on top form, although on a couple of occasions he does lay on the garrulous patriot a bit too heavily. Lee Grant is sort-of OK, but she does have one small task to carry out. Definitely worth a watch.
An error has occured. Please try again.