User Reviews (29)

Add a Review

  • This is a very good film. You better watch it after you have seen some of th other Bergman movie, because its one of his more complicated movies.

    A psychiatrist suffers from something she cant understand. We will join her in her search for redemption. On the way will see complicated relationships, dreams with a deep meaning, and metaphoric visions. Very powerful moments in this movie. Those who love Bergman are sure to enjoy this, this is one of the best of his 70s/80s movies.

    Except the interesting storyline there's also good acting form all the players and an amazing acting from Liv Ullmann. Her fans will surely enjoy this.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In 1976 Ingmar Bergman released a 200 minute four part TV series starring Liv Ullmann and Erland Josephson. The Swedish director then edited the series for a 136 minute theatrical release, which is the version of Face to Face most people have seen. The movie shows the gradual nervous breakdown of Jenny (Ullmann), a psychiatrist currently living with her grandparents while her husband, also a psychiatrist, is lecturing in Chicago.

    Jenny's return to her grandparents' house should be a happy event. She grew up there after the death of her parents, and her grandmother receives her with affection. But a meeting with a spectral one-eyed old woman on the staircase alerts the viewer to the fact that something is worrying Jenny's mind. Whether real or a figment of her imagination, this figure becomes a recurring presence in her life.

    At a party, Jenny meets Dr. Tomas Jacobi (Josephson). He's interested in her, she's hesitant but maybe her loneliness draws her to him. They have dinner and then drive to his place, only for Jenny to lash out against his intentions.

    Later Jenny receives a call from a patient, who went to her former house hoping to find her there. Jenny finds her curled up in a corner and two men, apparently relatives, who attempt to rape her. With apparitions walking before her eyes and no one to lend support, Jenny takes an overdose of pills and peacefully waits for death.

    In Face to Face reality and dreams dissolve into each other. Jenny's suicide attempt allows Bergman to create a dream space where Jenny battles traumatic memories and confronts the people who've shaped her identity over life. The dreams are one of the film's best elements. Without special effects, without exuberant imagery, firmly grounded on her day-to-day reality, Jenny's dreams are however unsettling and claustrophobic. In one of my favourite dreams, Jenny meets all her patients in a little room in her grandparents' apartment; Tomas, standing against a wall, smugly smiles and a patient peels her facial skin.

    The role of Jenny is so demanding and complex that only a great actress like Liv Ullmann could do it justice. Face to Face is an amazing character study and she carries it on her shoulders. We quickly lose track of all the great scenes she shines in. In one of the most intense, she tells Tomas she was raped and proceeds to break down in a cry of pain. In a later scene she pretends to be her own grandmother and re-enacts a dialogue that may be from her childhood or just a fantasy.

    Erland Josephson doesn't have such an ostentatious role, but the serene personality he portrays is the perfect counterpoint to Ullmann's expansive performance. Also of note is the short performance of Gunnar Björnstrand (known for playing Jöns in The Seventh Seal) as the grandfather.

    Although the movie deals with a mental collapse it's far less hysterical than one would imagine. Bergman knows how to make stories intimate and low key. A good decision was to get rid of the music. Then there is Sven Nykvist's work on the cinematography, suffusing the world of the movie, where the sun seldom shines, with shadows and washed-out colours. Like in Cries and Whispers and Fanny and Alexander, he complements the movie with mood and atmosphere.

    Face to Face is not an optimistic movie, although it's life affirming in a very stoic way. Life is hell and we have to go on seems to be its message. Life offers no resolution or compensation. Near the end, Jenny admits the suicide attempt to her daughter. In someone else's hands it would have been an emotional moment of closure for Jenny. But Bergman turns it into a final blow for Jenny to take. And from blow to blow life continues. Life must continue because, as bad as it may get, the alternative is much worse.

    Ingmar Bergman later in life expressed dissatisfaction with this film. For him it seemed like a parody of his own work. It's his opinion of course. But for me it's one of his most interesting movies. I've always been fond of his rare incursions into fantasy and dreams, like The Seventh Seal and The Hour of the Wolf. Although better known for his realistic portraits of the human condition, Face to Face shows that he's also an unsung master of fantasy and strangeness.
  • Ingmar Bergman's films always had, or at least, most of them had, a very dark and almost horror-ish tone to them, particularly films such as "Persona" and "The Seventh Seal", both which I consider among the finest films ever made. It was no surprise that his two 'official' horror films - this one and the slightly superior "Hour of the Wolf", come across as being not only of the genre's finest, but also one of the scariest of all time. Liv Ullman gives a breathtaking performance of a psychiatrist who turns out to be just as crazy as the people she takes care of. We follow her as she is lost in the hellish labyrinth of her subconscious, and harassed by horrible demons she created herself. Meanwhile, on the outside world, her 'darker side' takes over, and her friend and co-worker, played by the great Erland Josephson, tries to save her. Ullman's gradual descent into insanity is jaw-dropping, and here she gives her most twisted, hysterical performances for the likes of Isabelle Adjani in "Possession" and Catherine Denueve in "Repulsion". For the acting and Bergman's superb direction alone the film manages to convey a sense of dread and fear unlike anything Hollywood had done to this point, and indeed, the film does make the majority of American horror films made at that time look stupid in comparison. Overall, 10/10. A masterpiece.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    As every one of Ingmar Bergman's films, "Face to Face" (1976) deals with Life, Love and Death. The Bergman's alter ego in the film is "a well-adjusted, capable and disciplined person, a highly qualified professional woman with a career, comfortably married to a gifted colleague and surrounded by what is called "the good things of life." It is this admirable character's shockingly quick breakdown and agonizing rebirth that I have tried to describe. I have also, on the basis of the material at my disposal, shown the causes of the disaster as well as the possibilities available to this woman in the future." (Ingmar Bergman)

    This seemingly successful woman who would attempt a suicide is played by Liv Ullmann and whatever has been said about her in this film as a psychiatrist who faces and struggles with her own nervous breakdown, still can not describe how she did it. For almost two hours, she is in every scene of the film, "lonely, ashamed", and facing unbearable nightmares of her past, struggling for her sanity. She gave, perhaps, the most powerful and unforgettable performance by any actress on the screen. She literally transforms herself in several different persons - her voice, facial expressions, the manner of speech, emotions - change with such a rapid speed and so effortlessly in front of you - it would take your breath away.

    I've never been as moved and fascinated by any performance on the screen as by Liv's in the film and I think the second time even more than the first one. Sure, it was a Bergman's film, his ideas, his anxieties; his "toothache" in the heart but it was Liv who lived through them and showed them with such powerful depth, honesty and selflessness that the film will always belong to her. This is one performance never to forget.

    Both Bergman and Ullmann were nominated for an Oscar (directing and acting) but for unknown and strange reasons, the movie is not available on DVD or even on tape.

    "yes" – to the movie and YES! to Liv Ullmann
  • Xstal5 February 2023
    Jenny has a successful career, a psychiatrist with a future that's clear, but her anxiety, takes her sobriety, overwhelmed with her demons and fears; open wounds born from scars as a child, generations define how she's styled, unable to break, from nightmares when awake, perpetually standing on trial; she's decided to fold and resign, stop the clock, disentangle, untwine, enough is enough, the candle must snuff, the coil must become a line.

    Seldom will you encounter a performance as powerful as the one presented by Liv Ullmann as Jenny. Conveying the trauma and terror, the chaos and confusion, the despair and anguish of mental illness, alongside the inevitable pathway to escape, this is nothing short of exceptional.
  • Hey, it's Bergman PLUS Liv Ullmann, the greatest actress on the planet, and she's playing a psychiatric doctor who is slowly but very surely going wholly bonkers. Scenes carry depth and anxiety and a sense that things can come apart even when things seem serene - and when it gains momentum near the end, it's a wonder to behold. What's not to love?

    Actually, I will be critical of one scene - in the 2nd half of the film, Bergman puts Jenny, his protagonist, into a double-state (hey, why not when it's a psychological thing) as she is about to, and does, a suicide attempt and recovers in the hospital and then goes into dream states. Most of these dream scenes are effective in depicting a mind at battle with itself and the personal demons of old coming back in full force (two such scenes are when Jenny confronts her parents, a back and forth *true* Love/Hate scene that is staggering, and another where she is surrounded by her patients in a room, one of them her grandfather who says flat out he's afraid of dying, to which she responds 'Just count to ten, and if you're still alive... count to ten again', which is great).

    However, there is a scene that is very heavy-handed to me - yes, even for Bergman - where he has his leading lady see herself in a casket, the casket is closed shut as she is yelling and banging on the door, and then the casket is set on fire as Outside Jenny laughs. To me, this just made me go "Really, Ingmar, you're gonna go there?" But that's nitpicking when in the midst of a master at work, and boyo-boy it is a master at a career peak - given a boost by Ullmann, who starts out pretty sweet and 'normal', and then her character goes through a traumatic event (an attempted rape), but we learn that this is not even what makes her go insane - far from it, that's just the icing on the Crazy Cake. As Bergman delves deep into this woman's psychosis, it reveals how harrowing it can get, but also, ultimately, how important it is to live and to try to find some semblance of peace. Love, ultimately, is the goal, to find some caring and harmony in life while we're here.

    If nothing else, the scene where Ullmann finally unloads her personal and mental baggage on a bewildered but patient and understanding Erland Josephsson should've gotten her TEN Oscars by itself. I rarely say this, but God bless Liv Ullmann, and Dog bless Ingmar Bergman. ;)
  • Rob-12015 October 2012
    Warning: Spoilers
    Dr. Jenny Isaakson (Liv Ullman) is a Swedish psychiatrist who specializes in treating the mentally ill. But Jenny finds her own sanity in question, as she starts to fall into a midlife depression. After a failed suicide attempt, Jenny has hallucinatory dreams where she is haunted by her psyche (her deceased parents, her loving grandparents, her patients, etc.) It's left in question whether or not she fully recovers from this. Ullman gives a powerful performance in a serious drama about mental illness. Bergman directs well, with long takes and occasional split-screen imagery. But this isn't a feel-good movie that you want to see more than once.
  • grellmary20 July 2005
    In this harrowing film about the mental collapse of a psychiatrist, Bergman shows exactly why he is a master film maker/director. He dissects Jenny's breakdown with such precision, from the meeting with her grandmother to her eventual complete crash into insanity, it is difficult not to be wrenched into the film. The acuteness of Jenny's anxiety and fears grow steadily and continuously as the film moves along and you have no choice to feel it too. The choice of music also exacerbates that feeling of impending disintegration of Jenny's mind. Liv Ullman who plays Jenny does an awesome job in this rather ironic role of the shrink who is slowly but surely losing her own mind. This may be a slow moving film for some, but this is exactly why this movie is done so well. It is a definite watch.
  • MartinTeller6 January 2012
    The first time I saw this, I thought the dream sequences were disappointing. The second time, I found them interesting. This time, I felt they were a mix of the two. Some work and some are too histrionic. And that describes the movie in general. I can't keep making excuses for it, it's just not very good. There are amazing moments (the rape scene, Jenny's talk with her daughter) but then are moments that are embarrassingly hacky. It's a rather vague and cheap depiction of madness, surprising because we know Bergman can do it well (see: THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY). That final breakdown is cringeworthy. I don't blame Liv Ullmann. Bergman himself felt the movie was a failure, too ambitious. Despite some masterful elements (including a lot of Ullmann's performance) it's one of his weaker films overall. I will probably never get to see the complete version, which is too bad because I bet it comes together more cohesively, achieves a greater balance.
  • green2u13 February 2001
    I saw this film in its original release in 1976 and to this day it haunts me as if it were a part of my past (though nothing about this film is). Liv Ullman's raw performance remains best performance by an actress in my history of filmgoing.
  • No director came ever close to Ingmar Bergman when it came to a mystical and psychological approach of human condition. Bergmanian faces faced the impending doom of mortality whilst they shielded their soul from the cries and whispers of a devouring subconscious, pandering to puritan and suffocating bourgeois-like formalism. The existential dilemma relied on whether to rebel against God, society or yourself? And how can an individual voice ever make itself heard amidst the deafening silence of God and the internal vacarm that govern it.

    From such heavy-handed interrogations, "Face to Face" is certainly a most ambitious project from Bergman, maybe too ambitious from the way he got carried away by an excess of symbolism. The film chronicles the emotional journey of a substitute psychiatrist named Jenny Isaakson (Liv Ullman), a wife and mother, alone during summer vacation (while her husband is at a Congress in Chicago and her 14-year old daughter in a riding camp). Jenny stays at her grandparents' house that revives some haunting memories and fuels rather disturbing nightmares, one consisting of a sinister one-eyed old woman (Tore Dyveke Segelcke).

    Here you've got all types of troubles packed into the vulnerable soul of one woman; marital, psychological, existential, all sorts of relationship in fact, making ironic the way she was deemed by Erland Josephson (Dr. Tomas Jakobi) as "a miracle of mental health". If anything, the film invites us to contemplate that even behind the balanced posture of normal and well-spoken people, you might find an inclination to violent breakdowns. Beware the silent ones indeed and the 'suicide attempt' occurring in the film seems more plausible than if it was from someone vocal about it. All credit goes to Ullman who delivers the performance of a lifetime, similar to Gena Rowlands in "A Woman Under the Influence", a woman entrapped in her own inhibitions while tortured by devilish thoughts and painful memories.

    So "Face to Face" is never as powerful and poignant as when it keeps a shadow of mystery for we can read in Liv Ullman's face the gentleness of a woman with delicate features but whose sad eyes keep yelling for help. Jenny never seems to act but her unhappiness is as plain as the crisped smiles and hesitations she puts on her attempt to reassure her entourage that "everything's all right". Her pampering grandmother (Alno Taube) can see that something's not right with her husband, a wife can tell, her own husband (Gunnar Björnstrand who sadly lost his prestance) is nearing death and has only a few words in this films but what words: "old age is hell". People can read in Jenny and even a neurotic patient Maria (Karl Sylwan) gazes at her, touches her eyes and front, and says in a very laconic way "Poor Jenny". That scene exudes "Persona" vibes where the observer becomes the object of uncompromising scrutiny.

    Yet the mirror-like duality induced with Maria is barely explored by Bergman who was getting lucid about the futility of therapy, something echoed by Jenny's colleague who declared "I don't think we can cure one person, maybe one or two despite our efforts", the violence of the psychiatric methods are more or less perceived as an invasion of intimacy, a symbolical rape (so to speak) almost foreshadowed by Maria's bruised face. At some point Jenny says that she's somewhat happy because she's made herself safe and sound the illusion of stability and happiness are the closest to a placebo preventing toxic feelings or past traumas to emotionally cripple you. But the more you internalize anger, the more likely you turn your psyche into an emotional grenade. It's all a matter of when will the pin be pulled out?

    After having dinner with Tomas, Jenny goes to his house, he starts a flirting approach that she cancels almost instantly, asking him "how you figured out overcoming the awkwardness of getting undressed". This awkward exchange is my favorite moment, reminding how great chemistry the two actors had in "Scenes from a Marriage", it's obvious they are lonely and disilussioned and found a channel of mutual appreciation but somehow Jenny can't let herself be conquered. Naturally, it's not the rebuttal to put in the equation but a subconscious parellel Jenny draws between her body intimacy and her intimate secrets, as if the body wasn't a temple of pleasure but a sarcophage where mummified torments were preserved.

    The body and soul dichotomy is inexistant within Jenny as illustrated in the disturbing rape attempt scene. The man who assaults Jenny gives up, later she confesses that she somehow wanted to be aroused through a pain that would make her feel alive, but it was all "dry" and "tight" indeed. Jenny had reached a no-return point where the body and the soul made one and but the desecration of the body is still the lesser of two evils, making the suicide a most natural final step. Why would she choose to have a platonic relationship with Tomas might speak higher of her opinion about him, the less he tries to get inside her literally, the more inclined she is to open the sarcophage and reveal how the darkest secrets of her upbringing in one of the most intense breakdown scenes ever.

    "Face to Face" is the study of a woman who has let her body and her mind slip into a semi-catatonic state of illusory normality, treasuring known horrors for the unknown might be the worse. Which takes me to the film's main problem: why not keep the unknown unseen? Bergman's punctuates the film with too many surreal sequences that generate more confusion than cohesion and don't add much to what Ullman's monologues or eyes can convey. For a film so sober and intellectually rich, so horrific and yet optimistic, it's a shame that Bergman got carried away by the subject. Both him and Ullman would be Oscar-nominated but it might be one of the rare times where the actress outperformed the director.
  • "Face to Face" exists mostly as a showcase for one of Ingmar Bergman's favorite actresses, Liv Ullmann, and she gives a tour de force performance. She plays Jenny Isaakson, a psychiatrist who can't help herself when her mental illness sends her teetering over the brink into a complete emotional breakdown. The film is unrelenting, comprised of one merciless scene after another in which the camera rests in extreme closeup on Ullmann's face and captures the anguish writ large there. It's a tough watch, but it's also morbidly fascinating. I've always been interested in studies about mental illness, and "Face to Face" is one of the most realistic I've seen in showing how such an illness manifests itself.

    Ullmann was nominated for an Oscar for her performance in the year that Faye Dunaway won for "Network." The Academy had a tough decision on its hands that year. And Bergman also received a nomination for Best Director.

    Grade: A
  • Face to Face isn't one of the best-known films directed by Ingmar Bergman, but it has decent ratings from sites like IMDb and Letterboxd. I was hoping it would therefore be a bit of an unknown gem, but it's mostly just middle of the road by Bergman's standards. That still means it's far from bad, and it had me more interested than some of his best known films (I have Cries and Whispers hot takes- that's probably a previously unsaid sentence in human history).

    It's a psychological drama that talks more about the psychological side of things instead of depicting it visually or in an otherwise more engaging way. I feel like sometimes it spells things out, and sometimes feels purposefully vague. It's the kind of Bergman film I don't really like, but thanks to how it looked and how good Liv Ullman was in the lead role, I stayed somewhat interested. It's almost like she understood the movie better than Bergman himself, because it didn't feel like things were totally committed on his end- maybe his heart wasn't really in this one.

    So it's a disappointment, but certainly not a terrible movie. Probably worth tracking down for dedicated Bergman fans.
  • Shot in 1975, originally for Swedish television, Ingmar Bergman's film ANSIKTE MOT ANSIKTE (Face to Face) explores the idea of a psychiatrist herself struggling with mental illness.

    As the film opens, Dr. Jenny Isaksson (Liv Ullmann) is standing in an empty house, her family having removed everything in preparation for a move into a new house later that year. In the meantime, her husband is working in America for a few months and her daughter is at a summer camp. Waiting for the family to be reunited and move into the new house, Jenny temporarily settles in with her grandmother (Aino Taube) and grandfather (Gunnar Björnstrand), the latter of whom is poignantly suffering from dementia. Jenny is initially happy to dedicate herself to a new position at the clinic, but soon she finds the wall between reality and delusion breaking down, and the film chronicles her deterioration.

    I personally don't consider ANSIKTE MOT ANSIKTE "major Bergman". Firstly, the cut theatrical version feels sputtering and unfocused and consequently its 2-hour length can seem interminable. Sadly, the original television version has never been released, so neither can audiences have that. Secondly, Bergman had made a few films before that dealt with madness or the dark regions of the psyche, and especially in the second half of ANSIKTE MOT ANSIKTE the director resorts to what had already become some clichés for him.

    Still, even second-rate Bergman is worth at least one viewing. In spite of often retreading past ground in showing us what's in Jenny's head, Bergman does at times give us a fresh angle on the theme of mental illness, attempting to convey how much loneliness and shame it involves. Jenny is wracked with emotion but unable to communicate it to those around her, and she feels utterly alone as even those close to her fail to understand her plight. The acting is also superb, with Liv Ullman able to portray a whole spectrum of mental states. Erland Josephson appears in a supporting role, one of the threatening, Mephistophelian characters he did so well.

    There is, incidentally, one aspect of this film that makes it a real curiosity in Bergman's body of work. Over the preceding couple of decades, Bergman had shot films that were either period films (medieval or early 20th century) or were fairly contained dramas about small, mainly upper-class circles, with little representation of broader society and changing mores. Here, however, the outside world suddenly and rather crudely intrudes on a Bergman film: early on, Jenny attends a party thrown by a campy, somewhat Cathy Berberian-like, elderly woman (Sif Ruud) who dotes on a pair of gay men that she has quasi-adopted. The two men are homosexual stereotypes, sashaying, tight jeans and all, and the party involves some sexually libertine folk dancing to Abba-like pop music of the time. One gets the impression that Bergman was feeling challenged by younger filmmakers like Vilgot Sjöman, but this sudden reflection of 1970s Sweden quickly disappears and the film returns to more traditional Bergman territory.
  • This movie is nothing short of of a masterpiece of dramatic power and psychological insight. If the mark of a great work of art is that it takes a lot out of you while at the same time giving you a lot, then "Face to Face" is a great film by one of the cinema's (and the theatre's) greatest directors.

    During the 136-minute film we are confronted with the spectacle of an intelligent woman's soul being laid bare. It is the soul of Jenny Isakson (Liv Ullmann), a Stockholm psychiatrist, as she finds her confidently professional self-assured hold on the world slipping perilously into disarray. Liv Ullmann is of course no stranger to this type of intense Bergman role, from the mute actress of "Persona" to the defeated wife in the 1974 "Scenes form a Marriage" and in films like "Shame," "The Passion of Anna," and "Cries and Whispers." What a marvel!

    For virtually the entire length of this harrowing piece, the actress is on screen, and she is such a mistress of her craft, one feels like reaching up to the screen to embrace and perhaps congratulate her. It is that kind of moving performance. The much-praised scene in which she tells Erland Josephson about an attempted rape she experienced has the intensity of an operatic aria as she shifts moods: bemused laughter, pleading sobs, hysterical abandon. It is hard to see the junctures between each emotion. They meld into an overwhelming emotional experience. This and the other collaborative efforts of Bergman and Ullman have very few parallels in the history of cinema. Some of them might be: Roberto Rossellini and Ingrid Bergman, Josef von Sternberg and Marlene Dietrich, G.W. Pabst and Louise Brooks, Federico Fellini and Giulietta Masina.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    One of my film-watching habits is to amble around widely-ranging varieties of films from different directors, different eras, different genres and different countries, then randomly picks one under my own volition, from time to time, I may have a compulsive appetite towards Ingmar Bergman, though whose films often demands a longer interval between, almost 5 months after watching SUMMER INTERLUDE (1951, 7/10), my second entry of this year's Bergman pilgrimage is FACE TO FACE, his latter psychiatric study of a tormented woman's endeavor to find her true self, and the most extraordinary feat is unbiasedly attributed to Liv Ullmann's tour-de-force commitment to her role, a quintessential once-in-a-lifetime liberation to be elicited on the screen, a touchstone for Liv's legendary career!

    A 35mm color film, Liv Ullmann plays a psychiatrist, who has just emptied her house and relocated to live with her grandparents while waiting to be transferred abroad with her frequent- on-business husband and her daughter, currently is in a student camp. Then the claustrophobic apartment where her grandparents stay apparently is also the place she spent most of her childhood, and it uncannily resurrects the wraith of a forbidding image haunts her once and now reappears, an indeed hair-raiser out of Bergman's indomitable close-framing.

    Liv's mental condition keeps going downhill after she experiences an unsuccessful rape attempt, which subsequently evokes her inner sexual dissatisfaction and she confides to her new acquaintance she at first met at a friend's birthday party (a fellow doctor whose initiative towards her is a moot and will turn out to be closeted gay man, played by Josephson, who retreats from Liv's counterpart husband in SCENES FROM A MARRIAGE 1973, 8/10 to a sidelined observer) about her innermost desire. Deeply harassed by the recurring wraith she executes a futile suicide, whereupon she alternatively battles between dream and reality, the illusory dream sequences cast a self-emancipating spell on her but remains elusive to its audiences (her strait- laced childhood, the guilt towards her parents' car accident etc.), finally she seems to convalesce from the incubus and decides to return to work and embrace a brand new day as if nothing has happened, the film abruptly ends, withholding its own POV of what will ensue next.

    Death and love is an eternal theme for Bergman, and they surround each other, through his stoic camera-work and overlong gazes into Liv's escalating breakdown, under the veneer of a normal life, each human individual has a variety of discrepant mentalities contribute to our own distinctiveness and intricacy, within the art form of cinema, no one can best Bergman in this slant and FACE TO FACE is his fastidious anatomy of a living soul to the utmost bareness, as disquieting and repercussive as ever!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The first time I saw "Face to Face," in the mid-1990's, it made a powerful impression on me. Of the ten or so Bergman films I've seen, this was the one that moved me the most, particularly because of Liv Ullmann's powerful, emotionally naked performance.

    So, when I learned that the AFI Silver Theatre was showing this film in honor of Bergman's 100th Birthday, I was eager to see it once more. I sent out the word to my movie-going friends, and got absolutely no takers. Apparently, not many people want to watch a film about a psychiatrist's descent into madness. So, I took myself off to the AFI yesterday, and watched the theatrical version of "Face to Face" once more.

    Although the film did not have the spiritual impact on me this time, I still found it to be a fascinating, and oddly, very hopeful film. It's no accident, I think, that Bergman followed up his previous film about madness, "Through a Glass Darkly," which had no hope, with a film that also takes its title from the same passage in Corinthians, perhaps the most beautiful passage in the Bible. I wondered about the title, and I believe that the most important relationship in this film was between Ullman's character, and the near stranger played by Erland Josephson.

    Although he is almost a stranger, he quite literally saves her life, both by finding her after her suicide attempt, and by being with her in her spiritual crisis. The "unbeliever's prayer" he offers her at the end it seems to be a call to put human relationships at the center of her life.

    Yet, in a way, I feel the closest relationship she will ever have in her life is with a man she will probably never see again, who is literally her savior. In the absence of God, only our relationships with other humans can save us. That's what I believe Bergman is trying to say in the film.
  • davidmvining20 January 2023
    It was nice to settle in to rediscover why I love Bergman films, even if this ends up being a more minor work that doesn't hit nearly as well as other films he made around the same time.

    Dr. Jenny Isaksson (Liv Ullmann) is a psychiatrist working as the temporary head of a psychiatric ward in Sweden while her husband Dr. Erik Isaksson (Sven Lindberg) is attending a conference in Chicago. There is a deep unhappiness about this separation which seems to be rooted in some marital troubles, nothing that ever gets spelled out. In fact, Jenny talks about having taken on a new lover in her husband's absence that she finds unappealing. At a party for a colleague's wife where she reveals her new lover to her social circle, Jenny meets Dr. Tomas Jacobi (Erland Josephson), and Jacobi, a noted theorist on love, sets his sights on her immediately, making it clear that he wants to make Jenny a conquest. She is open to it, but she's also slow going, having dinner with him, going to his house, and deciding that it was a mistake; that she needs to go home.

    Home is the house of the grandmother who raised her after the death of her parents. Grandmother (Aino Taube) takes care of the steadily ailing Grandfather (Gunna Bjornstrand) while overbearingly looking after Jenny's every little need as she moves in her few possessions left over after having abandoned her old house in preparation for a new construction that should be completed in a few months.

    There's a lot going on this film (cut down from a television series like Scenes from a Marriage and Fanny and Alexander), and I think it ends up too much. The core of the film is Jenny's mental break from reality, but there's a lot of stuff swirling around it, in particular around the past. Her disgust with old people gets contrasted with her quiet observance of the love between her grandparents. Her emptying out one house, having to live in the apartment she grew up in for a time, while her husband is away, their child is at horse camp, and she's waiting for the future, her new house, to come upon her. Her whole life has been disrupted, and it awakens something inside her. There's talk early from one of her colleagues where he damns the entirety of psychanalysis, saying that they can't help anyone and that anyone who does get better under their care was going to get better anyway.

    Jenny ends up consumed by things she sees that aren't there. There's a woman with a whole black eye who appears in her room, and there's a whole event where one of Jenny's patients (who should be locked up in the hospital) ends up at her house with two men, one of whom attempts to rape Jenny but fails. It's never really brought up again except by Jenny as she explains it to Jacobi right before she has a complete break that ends with her trying to commit suicide. And this is where the film gets surreal with Jenny finding herself in some kind of afterlife, decked out in red (the echoes of Cries and Whispers from a few years earlier is obvious), and it's where the film gets as explicit as Bergman did. It's the sort of free-flowing dialogue that Bergman wrote where people can actively contradict themselves and even outright lie, but I just never felt Jenny's plight in these moments like I did in similar moments of something like Scenes from a Marriage. I get it, but I just didn't feel it.

    I wonder if that gets addressed with the longer television cut. Maybe I'll try to find it out one day.

    This film version builds to the point where Jenny gets to choose between trying to rediscover the regularity that gave her comfort or pushing further into a kind of debauchery that Jacobi represents. The regularity of a normal life seems to have been the only thing keeping her from succumbing to her own insanity, and...it's interesting but not really involving. I recalled more than once Bergman's From the Life of the Marionettes, another look at insanity from Bergman. There's a similar distance from the subject that, I think, prevents the kind of clear-eyed view of the characters that Bergman's work on divorce did. This was also, apparently, the final film Bergman made before his self-imposed exile from Sweden for tax purposes, so he obviously had this sort of stuff on the brain.

    Still, Liv Ullmann anchors the whole thing, and this is a showcase for her through and through. She has highs and lows, and it's all supported by Bergman's strong (even if it seems to be missing the mark) writing. I can easily see why she would be nominated for an Oscar for it.

    Still, it's late Bergman, and it really reminded me of why I love that period. Told mostly in closeups on intricately designed sets, it's about the faces and the people, and I think it mostly succeeds. He's not everyone's cup of tea, but even when he didn't entirely succeed I can find a lot to grasp onto and enjoy.
  • I love and greatly admire Ingmar Bergman, Sweden's greatest director by default, and his films. Face to Face is not one of his very best, but of a generally highly impressive resume it is up there as one of the better ones. Sven Nykvist's cinematography is both gorgeous and atmospheric, and the nightmarish dream sequences are really striking. The dialogue as you would except from a Bergman film really makes you think, Bergman's direction is superb and the story is dark, harrowing and hugely personal. Erland Josephson provides an ideal counter-point to Liv Ullman. Bergman regular Gunnar Bjornstrand's role is very short but he does leave an impression. The best asset of Face to Face is easily the extraordinary performance of Liv Ullman, I have yet to see a bad performance from her and this for me was one of her best ever, enormously intense, very commanding and her eyes are as expressive as they ever were. She is especially good in the telling of the attempted rape, which had so many complex emotions, all of them nailed. In conclusion, Face to Face is one of Bergman's better films, if not one of the finest among the likes of The Seventh Seal and Fanny and Alexander, lifted by Ullman's performance. 10/10 Bethany Cox
  • gbill-748773 February 2022
    "Do you think we're an army of one million emotionally crippled people, wretches who wander around, shouting to each other with words we don't understand and that make us even more scared?"

    Liv Ullman plays a psychologist helping some seriously disturbed patients, but in time we find that she suffers from childhood trauma and has some pretty serious issues of her own. While she tries to face her demons, I think the title is ironic, because if anything "Face to Face" seems to be about facing the disquieting truth about the human condition, that we are ultimately alone. Brace yourself, because it's a rather somber work.

    We see a divorced man (Erland Josephson) rather sadly try to pursue her, her grandfather (Gunnar Björnstrand) breaking down in old age, and a friend pathetically try to turn the wheels of time back by getting a lover 26 years younger. There is great cynicism about human connection, and the ability of psychology to help patients with their problems. There is an attempted rape, attempted suicide, and attempts at connecting with family members, all of which fail, which I think is telling.

    It's interesting to see the faces of people at a piano recital, as the music is so beautiful and they look erudite and enjoying something elevated, but it's contrasted to the people we learn about, each of whom have problems, like the "emotionally crippled" people Ullman's character alludes to. Bergman offers a ray of hope in the love between the grandparents, but it's brief.

    Liv Ullman gives a virtuoso performance and the dream sequences Bergman includes are dramatic and frightening, so I was tempted to nudge my review score up a bit. The way the plot slowly meanders and how certain elements played out were a bit of a letdown though. Overall, it seems like the germ of the idea was a good one and it has its moments, but it fell short for me. Watch it for Ullman's performance though.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    There are lots of truly great filmmakers in cinema history. Great films have been made everywhere in the world in the last 115 years. But true masters who fundamentally influenced and changed cinema are but a few, relatively speaking. Of course it first started with the 'fathers'. The people who participated in the birth of cinema, and help build cinema from the foundation up in early 1900, like D.W. Griffith in the United States, Giovanni Pastrone in Italy. And then in the 1920s filmmakers like Sergei Eisenstein in Russia, F.W. Murnau and Fritz Lang in Germany, Alfred Hitchcock in England, Cecil B. DeMille and King Vidor in the United States. Then in the 30s cinema had surpassed it's 'birth' stage, and was starting to evolve; grow. The format, the language and technique of a film were set and familiar. We knew what 'a movie' was, so now let's make them better and better. The final essential evolution was sound. From this point on the form was ripe. That's when the true masters of cinema slowly started to appear.

    Hitchcock is one of the most unique ones of the true masters, since he also was one of the fathers of cinema. He started in the mid 20s all the way up to 1976..! There are few to none other masters that can claim to have a number of classics in every decade from the 20s up to the 70s. But there are more, and even more interesting masters in cinema. People like Orson Welles, Akira Kurosawa, Federico Fellini, Stanley Kubrick, Ingmar Bergman and Jean-Luc Godard seem to be regarded as the greatest masters in general. Next to Kubrick, my favorite in this group is Ingmar Bergman.

    The cinema of Ingmar Bergman consists of films about people... struggling. Bergman is famous - and infamous - for his so called 'depressive movies'. But, for me it's so obvious and essential that they're not depressive at all. They depict the darkest and bleakest themes and subjects, but Bergman films are often very hopeful in the end. Lots of characters in his films are depressed; or struggling with anxiety and fear, sure. But depression is never his main goal. Bergman depicts, disassembles, analyzes and explores the human psyche. The soul. Meaning. And always in/near the context of the greatest existential concepts and ideas. The meaning of life might be rooted in emptiness in his work, but it's what we as humans do with life and ourselves that creates the existence of beauty, love and spiritual connection (which is my personal vision as well). Bergman is masterful in creating the most beautiful moods ever made in cinema. His films sometimes feel like the wind; sometimes like a mirror burning with fire; sometimes like an angry clown. But he touches you, from deep within.

    "Ansikte mot ansikte" (aka "Face to face") is a film about Jenny (played by Liv Ullman). Jenny is a psychiatrist who is confronted with one of her deeply disturbed but tragically endearing patients called Maria. A woman lost in an erotic spell of insanity and troubled thoughts. A mystery. As the film progresses Jenny slowly but surely seems to go in the same direction as the enigmatic Maria. We learn about her inner-demons and outher-troubles as she falls into the abyss of the human psyche. When she 'breaks' in the centre of the film, the film goes inwards - we experience her world of troubling thoughts and experiences in a beautifully confusing dreamlike innervision (think "Lost Highway" without the modern/pop element). In the end it all turns out to be...

    This was the one Bergman film I had yet to see for a long time. Brilliant and beautiful!
  • A tremendous performance by Liv Ullman as a psychiatrist who is herself slowly going mad, haunted by dreams or visions of her past, pushing her towards suicide.

    Some of the dream imagery is truly striking and nightmarish – once again Bergman comes close to making a horror film.

    But at times these visions and their symbols are a bit on the nose, and at times they get repetitive.

    None the less, I look foreword to seeing this again.

    I only wish the full 200 minute version (made as 4 50 minute parts for Swedish TV) were available. I have a feeling that might make for a richer experience
  • jromanbaker16 July 2020
    I have written before about Bergman here, but this film has eluded me until now. As I have said before I think his early films until ' The Seventh Seal ' are his best. Why ? He concentrates on life in its joy and sadness, and to a large extent avoids the terrors that he draws up from his own subconscious and projects on to us as viewers. ' Face to Face ' falls definitely into this category of madness and the terror of death and what lies on the borderline of death. Here he makes up visions of these borderline entrapments within the mind. His subjectivity here is total and terrible to experience for those viewers who are vulnerable and themselves fragile. The hope offered is minimal. The closed casket in flames, the disgust of an old person's touch, and the fears about never waking up to reality. The other films that I will list for those who are fragile in their minds are ' The Silence ', ' Through a Glass Darkly ', ' Persona ' ( to a lesser extent ) and the horror of watching someone die in torment in ' Cries and Whispers '. And in my opinion this horror of existence began in ' The Seventh Seal ' with the man screaming that he does not want to die, and the girl about to be burnt at the stake. I give it 2 for Liv Ullman for she does give an extraordinary performance, but to save my own mind I reminded myself of ' Smiles of a Summer Night ' and the equally, if not better performance of Eva Dahlbeck showing a sad joy of life not permitted in ' Face To Face '.
  • I saw this with friends when it was first released and twenty minutes after we had left the cinema we realized that no one had spoken. This is a masterful film with Liv Ullman's performance eclipsing any seen on screen. You feel the pain, the hurt and the confusion as you watch this woman's journey. A film for those who like intense, thought provoking and intelligent story telling.
  • The 1977 Academy awards saw Faye Dunaway win best actress for "Network". One of the other nominees was Liv Ullman for this movie. Ullman's is possibly the best performance in a movie ever by anyone. Hyperbole? I suggest you check it out.

    "Face to Face" is angst Ingmar Bergman all the way. As great as his writing and direction are, it's difficult to imagine this movie working at all No less as greatly as it does with any other actress carrying it. The movie depiction of a regular person going crazy can of course easily become unintentionally funny. But don't expect any laughs in this one beyond those in amazement at how good Ullman is.

    If you liked "Scenes from a Marriage" mr Josephon is also back here. And he and Ullman continue to Have a rarely matched chemistry in their scenes as a screen couple.

    There are a number of dream scenes- Nightmares actually. Again these could easily become unintentionally silly. I found them quite scary.

    46 minutes more was included in the Swedish TV presentation of this. It's never been released in any way to home video. Boy I'd love to see it, Because the nearly two hours here is superb.
An error has occured. Please try again.