User Reviews (23)

Add a Review

  • When something feels so real, true to its life in all respects, you get let in and buried beneath its weight. "Short Eyes" is a film that takes straight reality, fills it with characters and words of full realization, and takes you down the corridor of a 1 hour, 39 minute hell. Miguel Pinero wrote a script from a world he knew well, words and people from the dark side of America. No one but a former prisoner could have reflected things so pure and so ugly. Robert M. Young as director sets the scene and understands what the story needs. He lets it happen with the freedom begged for.

    I could say a lot more, I suppose, but every event hinges on those surrounding it, so to say much is perhaps having to say all. It's a flat painful experience, leaving you with the title character, played by Bruce Davison. Regardless of who you are or what your sin may be, this character is meant to be you. Watch him, feel his hurt, live his guilt, and he might just reflect a little bit of you back. This is not an easy thing.
  • A movie about prison life. It deals with the inmates--their lives, hates, sexual feelings and the rituals that happen in prison. Clark Davis (Bruce Davison) is thrown in with them--he's suspected of being a child molester ("short eyes" in prison slang). The other prisoners want to kill him...but Davis has talked to one prisoner Juan (Jose Perez) who has serious doubts about his guilt. But can he convince the others?

    This was a pretty big art house hit (here in Boston at least) back in 1977. It dealt with (for the time) a taboo subject matter. Then it completely disappeared. That's too bad--it deserves a wider audience.

    It was shot in an actual closed-down prison (the Tombs) in NYC. That really helps the mood and feeling of the film. The acting is very good by all--especially Davison, Perez and Joseph Carberry (as Longshoe). But this is a very hard movie to sit through. Davison's confession to Juan is VERY explicit, a sequence where a prisoner is beaten up and tortured by the others is unpleasant and the ending is very disturbing.

    It's not a perfect film. It was a stage play first--and it shows. The action never moves away from two areas and occasionally the inmates speak WAY too intelligentally for the characters they're playing. (I seriously doubt that the character Longshoe would ever know the word "quadroon"--or what it meant). Still a very powerful, disturbing drama. Well worth seeking out.

    Accomplished character actor Luis Guzman plays one of the inmates (good luck finding him).
  • harry-7621 March 2000
    "Short Eyes," filmed in and about the Men's House of Detention ("The Tombs") graphically documents the thoughtless conditions which existed in American prisons in our not too distant past. Without constructive programs for learning, personal growth and self improvement, physically or mentally, the inmates were left to fester with their own negative thoughts and actions. The results of such ingrowth is presented in an inactement which helps to foster social change. While the drama may be repulsive in many ways, it nevertheless informs on a topic which is extremely important. It's up to voting citizens to wield their power in bringing about proper rehabilitative opportunites for so-called criminals. With men couped up in close confines with virtually nothing to do, who wouldn't be tempted to succumb to unconstructive activities. Miguel Pinero wrote a powerful, educational play, and members of the New York cast are to be congratulated in their skillful ensemble work.
  • Short Eyes is to prison pictures what the atom bomb is to weaponry— powerful and frightening from one end to the other. In fact, I'm surprised the movie got made at all since it's got all the commercial appeal of live surgery. But once you start watching, you can't stop. The characters are real and riveting, the setting an actual prison (The Tombs), and the violence sudden and brutal. It's almost like being in prison, except thankfully you're not.

    The story is about one floor of the lockup where the packed-in racial groups appear poised for combat like Europe in 1914. There's a tense truce as long as Whites, Blacks, and Browns observe the unwritten rules and don't invade the wrong space. Too bad they're not making music all the time because that's the only time they seem in harmony. Then into this tense mix comes a guy everyone can despise, a child-molester (Davison). Worse, he's a white guy who even looks like "the man". So he's got as much chance of surviving as a minnow has among sharks-- that is, if the authorities don't pull him out first. And, kind of surprisingly, we wish they would since after listening to his "story", he seems more pathetic than wicked.

    Two things to note. Catch how difficult it is for any kind of humanity to survive amid racially charged, oppressive conditions that the authorities (guards, supervisors) only make worse. Juan (Perez) wants to cling to some vestige, but he's got to do it within the unwritten rules. And, in this testosterone-soaked atmosphere, the problem isn't just ethnic, it's other guys in general. However, the most nightmarish part is the threat of emasculation, men being denied their identity and turned into substitute women. That scene in the shower between Cupcakes and Paco may be more unsettling than even the knifing in Psycho (1960). I expect this loss of sexual identity may be the most unnerving part of a genuinely frightening movie, by which Hollywood's prison films pale in comparison.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I had never seen the play performed on stage, but I do own the play script and read it many times, it is one of my favorite plays. I also own the DVD of the film.

    Miguel Pinero is the author and he appears in the film as Go Go, a character not in the play. Pinero did not act in the Broadway version. The Go Go character plants a shank on another prisoner, which does not make him popular with the other inmates. They take some revenge on him by breaking his arm, we don't see him again.

    Some of the actors who were in the Broadway version recreate their roles here" Joseph Carberry as Longshoe Murphy, an tough Irish inmate Robert Maroff as Mr Nett, the guard who hates the Clark Davis character as much as the prisoners, as he says his own daughter was molested. Tito Goya as Cupcakes, a young prisoner who gets unwanted attention from the more predatory inmates.

    Two actors with more movie experience have the pivotal roles of Clark Davis (Bruce Davison) the suspected child molester and Juan (Jose Perez) the prison trusty who acts as the moral center of the piece. They have a great scene together, the film took a awhile to get going but it becomes riveting from this moment on. When Clark tells Juan he doesn't remember if he did the crime he is now in jail for, he also confesses that he has done things like it in the past. Juan is disgusted but does come to see Clark as a sick but pathetic person. When the other inmates get together to kill Clark, Juan is the only one against it. the murder is not shown but it is still hard to watch.

    There is a scene in the play after the murder in which the top officer Capt Allard interviews each inmate on what happened. In the film he just addresses the whole gang at once, telling them that Clark was innocent of the charge as the victim identified several other men as the attacker. Even though he may not be guilty this time, Juan is the only one who knows of his past.

    The film is very good but I also recommend finding and reading the original play.
  • Short Eyes is directed by Robert M. Young and written by Miguel Piñero who adapts from his own play. It stars Bruce Davison, Jose Perez, Nathan George, Don Blakely, Curtis Mayfield and Shawn Elliott.

    The Tombs, A House of Detention in New York City receives a new prisoner, white middle classed Clark Davis (Davison). He's charged with raping a young girl, quickly identified as a Short Eyes (paedophile) by the other inmates and lined up for hostility from the off. Only one prisoner is prepared to engage Clark in conversation, but with atmosphere on the block already bubbling at breaking point, Clark's innocence or guilt is most likely irrelevant.

    One of the most sedate but effective prison based movies out there, Short Eyes comes with realism, intelligence and a conscience. Piñero's play was itself a success, so source was reliable for treatment, what transpires is a tale of prisoners co-existing under trying circumstances. But it's a hornets nest slowly being stirred by pent up sexual frustrations, egos, racial indifference and religion, once the suspected paedophile wanders into the equation you can literally see the tension starting to rise to the surface. Yet director and writer don't go for cliché prison shocks involving violence and rape, they gnaw away at the viewers by letting the hatred and break down of moral codes build by way of rich characterisations and dialogue. It helps greatly that the makers have started the picture off by giving us a solid 20 minutes of character build ups, thus letting us get to know the inhabitants and their place of incarceration.

    Unity is powerful, but it can also be ugly.

    Some of the monologue's are utterly compelling, delivered with extraordinary conviction by a cast keeping the material real. When the excellent Davison, who I applaud for taking on the sort of role many actors would run from, gets to pour out his words to Juan (Perez), it's most uncomfortable viewing, yet also it's heartbreaking as well. It was here that it dawned on me that Piñero's (himself an ex-convict) characters are not prison film stereotypes, they are complex human beings, neither sympathetic or villainous, and that's a real treat in this particular genre of film. The photography is purposely low-key and the music, mostly arranged by Soul maestro Curtis Mayfield (who also co-stars) eases around the prison walls. Both Mayfield and Freddy Fender get to sing and this acts as means to subdue the pressure cooker like mood.

    This is not a prison film for those that need animalistic violence, this is very much a thinking persons prison piece. What violence there is is calmly constructed and acted by director and cast alike. The pivotal moment shocks, and rightly so, but here's the kicker, it doesn't shock as much as the monologue that closes out this most compelling and excellent of movies. 9/10
  • zetes15 January 2004
    Maybe the best prison film ever made because its origin is people who were actually in prison, most notably its main author, Miguel Piñero. The film deals with the interrelationship between the prisoners of a cell block. That's what most of the film is, the observation of these men and their culture. The plot of the film is about a new arrival (Bruce Davison) who has been arrested as a suspect on a child molestation charge. He's never been in prison, and he's very afraid, which, of course, he should be. Short Eyes doesn't make any easy choices at all, which makes for a particularly uncomfortable movie to watch. But it also makes it one of the gutsiest and most important films ever made, and it's one of the best movies I've ever seen. It's one of only two movies that I've ever watched twice right in a row. Well, the second time was with commentary by the director (and another man, whose participation in the film I don't exactly know), because I wanted to know exactly how this film came about, and to confirm my guess that there was some kind of inside track to prison life behind the scenes. There was far more than I could have guessed; the commentary also ranks as one of the best I've ever listened to. A masterpiece.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The Puerto Rican playwright Miguel Pinero (no relation to the English playwright Sir Arthur Wing Pinero) was originally a career criminal who turned his life around while serving an armed-robbery sentence in Sing Sing. In an inmates' playwriting workshop, Pinero wrote the brilliant drama "Short Eyes" which deservedly was produced on Broadway. A talented actor as well as a gifted writer, Pinero worked on other projects as well before dying tragically young of complications from his early years of drugs abuse.

    The movie version of "Short Eyes" was filmed in New York City's 19th-century prison the Tombs (NOT Rikers Island), which was closed at the time of the film's production but has since then been re-opened for business. Many of the extras and bit players in this film are actual inmates who were serving minimum-security sentences in the NYC prison system while this movie was made.

    As one might expect, this movie's depiction of prison life is jarringly accurate ... as is the foul language. All those prison movies of the 1940s featured Cagney or Bogart in an all-white prison population. In "Short Eyes", we see a prison population of blacks and hispanics (and black prison guards) in which white inmates (all working-class) are the racial minority. The inmates live in racially-divided conclaves. A black prisoner named Omar has converted to Islam, and he harangues the other blacks for being slaves to the white man. The leader of the white inmates is "Longshoe" Charlie Murphy (a standout performance by actor Joseph Carberry). The guards crack down on violence, but occasionally a guard will violate regulations and allow two inmates to brawl for a few minutes so that all the inmates will blow off some aggression which might otherwise lead to a riot.

    The subject of prison sex is dealt with tactfully in a brief shower scene. A young virginal hispanic inmate has been given the unwanted nickname Cupcakes. When he tries to take a shower, a predatory older inmate named Paco tries to seduce Cupcakes. What happens next ... or rather what DOESN'T happen ... makes this the least realistic scene in the film.

    The other outlet for the prisoners is music. We see Tex-Mex singer Freddy Fender as a Mexican inmate, leading his cellblock neighbours in a jam session. Curtis Mayfield also does double duty as an actor/musician here. There's a weird dance number which (unlike anything in 'Jailhouse Rock') is very plausible in this cellblock context.

    The prisoners are tolerant of one another's crimes: murderers, rapists and thieves are all accepted here. Now a new prisoner arrives: a middle-class white man named Clark (brilliantly played by Bruce Davison). Figuring this first-timer is here for a white-collar crime, Longshoe tells Clark the basics of prison routine. But then a guard reveals that Clark is a "short eyes": he's been charged with molesting a child. This is the one crime that these hardened inmates won't tolerate. Clark is now a pariah, and there's a harrowing scene in which the other inmates break down his dignity ... stealing his cigarettes and bullying him into surrendering the gold chain his mother gave him. Clark has only been charged with a crime, not convicted, but all the inmates are convinced he's guilty. One of the warders has a daughter who was molested ... not by Clark, but the guard is perfectly willing to scapegoat Clark for another man's crime.

    There's a riveting scene between Davison and Jose Perez as a trusty named Juan, who questions Clark about his guilt. Clark admits that he's a child molester, but he swears that he can't remember whether or not he committed the specific assault for which he's been arrested. Juan is sceptical about this. In a stark monologue, Clark describes one of his assaults on an underage girl.

    SPOILERS COMING RIGHT NOW. Because the white prisoners are outnumbered and out-toughed, Longshoe is under pressure to prove he's as hard as the leaders of the black and hispanic groups. While the other prisoners cheer him on, Longshoe grabs a prison knife (a razor blade with a toothbrush handle) and he slits Clark's throat. Before the guards arrive, the knife is whisked away... to be kept handy for other occasions. In an epilogue, a warder informs the inmates that an investigation has cleared Clark: he didn't commit the crime for which he was arrested. The hard faces of the inmates show they don't care: Clark was a "short eyes", and that's the one unpardonable crime in this place.

    "Short Eyes" is a taut and brilliant movie, with only a couple of scenes that don't quite convince. I'll rate this movie 9 out of 10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Clark Davis, a shy, soft-spoken, wholesome-looking middle class white male, is sent to prison for the heinous, unspeakable crime of child molestation. Clark's very presence causes the assorted racial conflicts, barely suppressed homosexual longings, and painfully nagging doubts about one's self-worth amongst the inmates to come to an explosive full boil on a heretofore calm multi-ethnic cellblock. The inmates band together to enforce their own vicious, complicated moral code upon the much pushed around Davis.

    Tough, gritty and frightfully plausible, "Short Eyes" rates highly as one of the best, most accurate and brutally realistic prison films ever made. Bruce Davison gives an astonishing, almost excruciatingly delicate, unexpectedly sympathetic and even moving performance as the pathetic, guilt-ridden pedophile; the scene where Clark confesses to having molested several little girls since he was fifteen years old is quite chilling and haunting; it's perhaps the most blistering and gut-wrenching moment in a generally searing and hard-hitting film. The outstanding ensemble cast all turn in exceptional work: Jose Perez as the compassionate Juan, who makes a valiant, humane attempt at protecting and understanding Clark; Joe Carburry as the volatile, irascible Longshoe, who initially befriends Clark and becomes his chief tormentor after discovering he's a "short eyes" (prison slang for child molester); former real-life convict Tito Goya as Cupcakes, a cute Hispanic inmate who secretly likes all the sexual advances he receives from most guys on his block; Mark Margolis as a hostile guard, Don Blakely as El Raheem, an overbearing, overzealous advocate of black pride and Islamic religion; and Shawn Elliot as Paco, a crude, hulking gay felon who only knows how to show affection through aggression (the scene where Paco tries to seduce Cupcakes in the shower is very touching). Keep your eyes peeled for Luis Guzman in his film debut as an extra inmate in a few crowd scenes.

    Richard Young's sharp, tautly wound direction, working from Miguel Pinero's unsparingly rough, profane, keenly observant and wholly credible script (Pinero, a onetime criminal who did five years in Sing Sing for armed robbery, based said script on his acclaimed Broadway play and acts in the film as GoGo, a coarse, hectoring homosexual inmate who frequently taunts Cupcakes), draws the grungy, desolate, claustrophobic and uncomfortable behind bars milieu in scarily lucid terms, smartly depicting the gloomy penitentiary as the filthy, festering, often ignored rusty bottom of America's melting pot culture (the film was shot on location in a notorious Manhatten Men's House of Detention called the Tombs). Country and western singer (and erstwhile jailbird) Freddy Fender has a remarkable bit as Johnny, a venerable felon who sings "Break It Down," a poignant song about the harshness and constricting nature of prison life; it's a wondrous, show-stopping moment. Pungent, shuddery score by Curtis Mayfield, who cameos as a disgusted elderly felon. By no means an easy film to watch (and at times a tad flat and stagy), "Short Eyes" nonetheless still qualifies as a truly startling and unnerving powerhouse of a movie.
  • Miguel Piñero adapted his own play (and co-stars as Go-Go) in this no-nonsense examination of life behind bars in a racially-heated men's jail. The prisoners segregate themselves by race, insulting each other with slurs which quickly lead to thrown punches, and yet this racial pride is really the most we learn about any of them. Bruce Davison stirs things up as the new inmate, one of only three white men in the cell-block, who admits to having a fixation on little girls; he can't remember if he molested a recent accuser or not, but quickly becomes the target of the other inmates' rage. Davison's monologues about a lifelong predilection for jailbait don't quite contain the honest ring of truth, yet are still terribly difficult to listen to, as is most of the dialogue. The scenario is commendably not exploitative--and is blessedly free of being sexually or violently explicit--though the threat of rape hangs in the air, possibly meant as a scare tactic for younger viewers. Still, Piñero's narrative is loftier than your average cautionary tale, and the film--although far from incisive--is a hard-hitting portrait of jailhouse life. ** from ****
  • Short Eyes is yet another 70's flick lost until recently in the world of obscure VHS,various licensing and grey market bootlegs. However, it is one of the best dramas of the decade and deserved the DVD re-release.

    The story centers about the denizens of "The Tombs", the Men's House of Detention in Manhattan, where it was filmed. Like many other prison-centered scripts, it fleshes out the microcosmic aspect of a isolated society and provides the alternate racial existence on "the inside" (where white is the minority). The story establishes the environment inside, outlining the groups and nearly making the life seem manageable. Then a white middle-class inmate arrives and is quickly exposed by a guard as a accused child molester, or short eyes. The group at large quickly responds as we see what this society really deems offensive.

    Along the way we experience religious presence, soulful expression, prison hierarchy, sexual intimidation, mental coercion, utter rage, blinding fear, confiding, alienation and displacement. In other words, the range of emotions from several characters displays to the viewer the depth and severity of how living in a world where entropy is the only constant. There is a passage in the movie where the complete ambivalence of every person becomes evident; there are no longer any allies or any semblance of trust when it is exposed that everyone will take what they want when possible. The guards are an important part of the population but there is no real opposition there- no protagonists to speak of, only a film of corruption over the cruel survivalist scene. Stirring, impassioned material.

    While there are no big stars in this, an independent adaptation of Miguel Pinero's early 70's play, it still has some amazing performances. Jose Perez does a stellar job as the one prisoner who can tolerate speaking with the 'short eyes'. Prolific character actor Bruce Davison is outstanding as the conflicted and confused molester, who cannot weather this change of environment. Nathan George, a great character actor who remained busy in the 70's, is in fine form here. Joseph Carberry is the central white inmate and wears his hate and mistrust as a badge of identity. And of course, there is no forgetting the cameos by the late Curtis Mayfield and Freddy Fender. In one group scene, Fender engages in a song ("Break The Dawn") captivating the entire population, an amazing slow soulful track that is matched by the following Mayfield song, "Do Do Wap is Strong In Here". Two smoky, slow-burn tracks sung by two legends that literally soothes the savagery here. A rewindable, unforgettable classic scene.

    In an extra note, superb modern Latino actor Luis Guzman appears as an extra here in his first film appearance. Look for him in the above Mayfield/Fender song sequence and in a few other scenes, sporting a blowout afro.

    There is ample reason why this is often referred to as a 'prison/horror film' but its really a stark, tense drama. Coupled with the Benjamin Bratt-lead Pinero, this is one of the best ways to get a taste of the lost genius of Miguel Pinero. The DVD issue of Short Eyes features a commentary track by the director along with Leon Ichaso, director of Pinero. Although there is much left open about this masterpiece, the commentary truly adds a lot of miscellaneous info that fans like myself would appreciate. Not to be missed.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The centerpiece of this, the ultimate ensemble prison drama, isn't the child molester aka "Short Eyes" (Bruce Davison) put into a cell-block of tough convicts who, after finding out his crime, turn the premises into their own courtroom, but a young handsome Puerto Rican nicknamed Cupcakes, played by the late Tito Goya, who has to deal with - or take advice from - these same toughies before, during and after the molester's story becomes center stage.

    While not the main character, Goya's youthful protagonist provides the core of the boiling pot involving a bevy of eclectic, dangerous cons from a tough Italian (Joseph Carberry), a stubborn black muslim (Don Blakey), a sexually-driven Puerto Rican (Shawn Elliott), two laidback but badass African Americans (Nathan George, Ken Steward), and the film's true star: a good-hearted Rican "idealist," played brilliantly by Luis Perez, who feels called-upon to protect Goya and the molester both.

    Based on the play by Miguel Pinero, also appearing as an antagonistic prisoner (if the film has a villain, he's it), all one can say is: you have to see it to believe it. And a soulful "singalong" with Curtis Mayfield and Freddie Fenders adds soul to the brash proceedings. (cultfilmfreaks.com)
  • I saw this movie at about the time it was made, on PBS, and a crappy little table top television.

    Others have described the plot and the nature of the character interactions in good, accurate detail, so I won't bother. I would only like to encourage others to get hold of this movie, any way they can, and to watch it, preferably with a friend, or even better, with a loved one. That will make the ultimate, and perhaps entirely expected tragedy easier to cope with, and will give you someone to talk with as your insights unsettle you, and as you are consistently impressed, sometimes in unexpected and startling ways, (which inevitably benefit by shared enthusiasm and discussion) by the actors, at least some of whom (i.e. Freddy Fender) have had very little or even absolutely no acting experience whatsoever. IMO there is not a single weakness in this movie and the movie itself is relentlessly realistic and unremittingly convincing.

    The two most lasting impressions for me...A)I have never forgotten the details of this movie and it seems to have been burned indelibly onto my memory, so that even 35 years (approximately) after I saw it (once) I could give you a good summary of it, including the unexpected plot twists and turns, and B) Even though I heartily disliked Freddy Fender's music my opinion of him went "through the roof" as a result of his performance in this movie. IMO he's "da man."

    I'm buying a copy of this movie (in DVD format this time) as soon as I submit this review.

    Please do yourself a favour and watch it.

    Douglas Coleman
  • One of the best prison movies out there to see, "Short Eyes" comes to present us a bitter and cold welcoming of a new unwanted prisoner in the hall: a child molester or as inmates call, a 'Short Eye'. The man in question is Clark Davis (played by Bruce Davison), an educated man, and totally opposite background of the majority present in that prison, arrested for child abuse, stranded in a place where he has no possible chance of making 'friends', and not even the chief guard likes him, promising to make hell of his life in there. Frightened and constantly persecuted by the other prisoners, he only has the chance to share some of his thoughts with Juan (José Pérez), who tries his best to believe that the man is innocent, becoming a confident to his stories that doesn't seem to make the other an innocent person. Tension is built up when a group of prisoners decide to get rid of Clark, then....be ready for the suspense!

    It's very surprising to see a theme like this being dealt in a film, presenting a tough reality in a very realistic way despite a few strange things here and there. But I gotta say that it was a little difficult to really enter in the mood of this film after seeing prisoners (one of them played by singer Curtis Mayfield, who makes the good soundtrack) doing musical numbers at the beginning, all of them happy to be there in jail; it was a little difficult to take it seriously during the first minutes. But then when Clark shows up, the movie starts to develop really well. And his character is actually more like a supporting character, the others are really the main characters and we're allowed to see their intrigues, their fight for things, for power, and their desire for Cupcakes (Tito Goya), the youngest of the prisoners. It's a well adapted play, dramatically involving, very thrilling and with lots of surprises. Must be noticed the memorable performances of the casting, with an outstanding acting coming from the always excellent Bruce Davison, who exclusively plays in other films the guy you'll always like and here, somehow you'll like him as well despite what the character represents. In real life we wouldn't feel any kind of sympathy for a man like his character.

    I was unaware of this film until a little research (can't remember of what or who) that brought me to a poster with an appealing tag line, the famous 'Jesus help me, cause men won't do' (present in a dialog between Clark and Juan); after that I had to watch it and liked a lot. Might not be a "Shawshank Redemption" but it's a good film as well. One of the forgotten classics of the 1970's that deserves some appreciation. 9/10
  • "Short Eyes" is a low budget, independent film that simply bristles with authenticity, taking place entirely inside a prison populated mostly by minorities. The knowing screenplay is by a real-life former convict, Miguel Pinero, based upon his acclaimed play. His dialogue may be highly profane, but it's colourful and well delivered by an impressive cast of unsung character actors of the stage and screen. It's not totally without humour (some of the prisoners stage a roach race at one point), but tends to be grim, and potent overall, pushing viewers' buttons with intensity.

    The scenario has a baby-faced white man (the great Bruce Davison of "Willard") brought in after he's been convicted of child molestation. Now, even people who don't work in the penal system know that even convicts tend to treat these creeps as the lowest of the low. One doesn't give much for Davisons' chances. He does make something of a connection to an even-keeled prisoner named Juan (Jose Perez, "Miami Blues"), to whom Davisons' character Clark unburdens himself.

    Ordinarily, one wouldn't have ANY sympathy for a p.o.s. like Clark, but Davison is vivid and believable as a frightened, pitiable loser who's basically a victim of some sick addiction. The rest of the cast is equally good: Perez, Nathan George ("One Flew Over the Cuckoos' Nest"), Don Blakely ("Vigilante"), Tony DiBenedetto ("The Exterminator"), Shawn Elliott ("Arbitrage"), Tito Goya ("Marathon Man"), Joseph Carberry ("Missing in Action"), and Mark Margolis ('Breaking Bad'). Music stars Freddy Fender and Curtis Mayfield have cameos that allow them to sing. And keep your eyes peeled for an uncredited Luis Guzman, making his film debut in a bit part.

    The material may be TOO potent for some viewers (and there is some graphic violence), but it's compelling every step of the way. This is an environment in which anybody who's not a career criminal would NOT feel safe. Director Robert M. Young, whose other credits include "Alambrista!", "Rich Kids", "The Ballad of Gregorio Cortez", and "Dominick and Eugene", shows you right away that the experience is not for the faint of heart.

    The film can favourably compare to the works of Edward Bunker, himself a convict who showed a talent for writing, and wrote what he knew: "Straight Time", "Runaway Train", "Animal Factory", etc. You may recognize HIM best as Mr. Blue in "Reservoir Dogs".

    Eight out of 10.
  • "Short Eyes" has an authentic look and feel, but suffers from an unfocused script, confusing dialogue (racial tensions run high in this prison....and the movie begs for subtitles!) and static direction. You know that something is wrong when the most compelling scene in a movie is the sordid confessional monologue of a child-molester. (**)
  • The performances in film version of Short Eyes are perhaps some of the best I've seen. Short Eyes, in prison slang, means child molester. The whole play revolves on a white pedophile Clark Davis interacting in a prison whose majority are Puerto Ricans and Blacks, and Davis' interaction with Juan who attempts to come to terms with Davis' need for sex with children.

    There are several memorable characters such as the very young and tender Julio, known as Cupcakes by the prisoners, who is the target of unwanted homosexual attention by several, if not all, prisoners. El Raheem is a strong black man, perhaps a Black Panther, who studies the Koran all day long and acts on his feelings of anger towards white people. Longshoe Murphy is a tough young Irish. And of course Clark Davis and Juan, who are the main characters of the play.

    Pinero, who plays GoGo in his the film version of his play, wrote this play while in Sing Sing prison at around 1974 for armed robbery, and first was performed by a cast of prisoners. Short Eyes had a very short success on Broadway.

    The only problem of the movie is the cinematography-it is rather boring, especially in this time where special FX of Lord of the Rings is rather common. But there are two or three rather beautiful scenes, one with a prisoner posing in front of a poster. Despite the very dated lackluster cinematography, I wouldn't hesitate to buy this film.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I had not seen this until the other day, last time was over 40 years ago. I found my self thinking...wow that's Joe Pesci, that's Curtis Mayfield, that's Freddie Fender, that's Luis Guzman, that's Bruce Davison, and on and on, sometimes so young they're barely recognizable, you're thinking it can't be, but then it is, kinda like Cuckoo's Nest. So you have this huge cast, sometimes mainly famous as major music stars, all jammed together as cons united in one thing only, their lethal hostility to the "short-eyes, the chomo, the child molester. Even his few fellow white con-mates reject and despise him in this well known hierarchy of power and hate, brought to it's natural apogee in prison, where respect and power gain huge currency when there's nothing else to place value on, and social position isn't buffered and diffused by anything. Written by an ex-con, who also shows up in the film, sort of like Edward Bunker did in Straight Time with Dustin Hoffman and Theresa Russel and Gary Bussey and Emmet Walsh, to name a few in that great prison flick. There's no shortage of prison movies and over the decades the styles and security protocol's change, and this is no exception. The style of a 1977 NYC hell-hole is different from a 50's Alcatraz, or that super modern fictionalized thing with Stallone and Schwarzenegger, I think it was called Escape....but the Hatred and Frustration are always ready to explode in all these movies, and here an entire staff and every prisoner, some profoundly perverted themselves, are united in persecuting just one underdog, the Short-Eyes, who is automatically at the bottom of the Prison pecking order, as they often are out here, but vastly intensified in so claustrophobic an environment, where a special amplified premium is placed on WHO YOU ARE, not what you have. It's dated in some senses, which gives it interest as a period piece, but pretty spot on with the treatment of the central persecutory theme. It also can be deliberately funny and a lot of the action suggests these talented people were given a directorial nod to just interact, and much of the action has a kind of loose semi-rehearsed natural flow to it...like after hours musicians getting together to jam for the fun of it.....no surprise considering that some of yesterday's musical stars keep popping up. Touted for its realism, that I can't speak to from experience, but considering who wrote it and HIS experience, and the willingness to tackle a not-to-typical topic, it likely is pretty close to the bone. The first thing that struck me as odd were that all the prisoners seemed allowed to wear their street clothing....and maybe in 77 in some joints that flew......but it all adds up to the impending and inevitable conclusion. The Short-Eyes is ironically the most innocent person among them, the least lethal anyway, and his sickness or perversity, somehow seems mitigated in comparison to the ceaseless ocean of persecution around him. Of course all this makes for a very interesting sort of thing to watch. Certainly ensemble acting, in a sense like Weeds, that old prison flick led by Nick Nolte, but a lot grittier and compelling, and the only romance here is of the prison -homosexual variety, often performed by heteros using whatever is available, willing or not, the same guys persecuting and calling perverted the "Short-Eyes". Not for everybody i suppose, but some sort of classic thing in its own strange category. I'd rate it as a must-see for anybody really into movies which I 'd think we all are. It'll be especially interesting to older people who are gonna recognize these people who were and sometimes still are very famous. See it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Every now and then in this very dark prison film, you see graphic elements of humanity coming from the alleged dredges of society, suddenly turning people who go out of their way to harass each other all the time becoming brothers. It's moments like this that turn alleged monsters into true human beings, and there's sympathy for the title character, a child molester played by Bruce Davison who becomes the lowest of the pecking order even though he already is because he's a minority, a white man. But a short eye, the slang term for a child molester, is the lowest of the low, and being both a short eye and white makes Davison an automatic hated victim, exposed viciously while at chow thanks to an angry guard who knows why he's there.

    This certainly is a much better movie than the film version of "Fortune and Men's Eyes", and while equally depressing, it has characters in it who have more dimension than the majority of characters in that more well-known film. The film is verbally graphic in its description of certain inmates' desires to sexually dominate others, usually the weaker ones, and the lust towards a pretty boy Puerto Rican by a much stronger Hispanic inmate indicates the surpressed homosexuality of the more masculine inmate. The protection that some of the inmates have without required rewards towards weaker inmates really adds to the humanity of these mixed up men.

    When an old guard is suddenly attacked, one of the inmates berates the attackers for their taking advantage of the guard's vulnerabity. It's moments like this that shows the soul underneath these law breakers and that leads to the main story, the friendship between the white "short eye" Davison and the sympathetic Hispanic prisoner Jose Perez. You're not supposed to forgive Davison for what his character allegedly has done, but you do get to see the other side of the story, from the regrets to the pain within his mixed up mind, and also question how wrong sometimes first impressions of people based on race or their physical appearance can be. The acting, script and direction are all terrific, with a few surprise musical guests as well. Davison has a speech that is sickening in words but poetry in the way he speaks. It's the type of film that can induce tears and create so many different emotions, and that makes it a film that is high art, wonderful and painful at the same time.
  • Child molester ''Short Eyes'' (Davidson) gets what's coming to him from his disgusted fellow inmates. Gripping, graphic, violent film was shot in the Tombs, the NYC prison. Powerful acting. Rated R for violence and profanity.
  • "Short Eyes" is an interesting film, it has many good points but at the end of the day it suffers from being viewed with the experience of 23 years of other films between the viewer and the production.

    Even looking at it based on dramas of the time , it would have been dated then and a moral hodge podge of "hippy" sentiment without the real "streetwise" attitude that it needs and wanted to so much. It even has a dreadful prison "sing-a-long" (only included because Curtis Mayfield leads the scene (otherwise it would not have been shot !) , the song itself is so well produced , and without having a wild track added makes you laugh at the pretentiousness of the scene rather than take it seriously.

    Having said that thou , it still has one or two scenes that shock , and I did not expect the ending that we got , and I did like it and would recommend it to everyone , but as long as they understand the time it was from , its a good film but time is not being kind to it.
  • Short Eyes, released in 1977, is a gripping and thought-provoking movie that delves into the complexities of human nature and the dynamics of power within a confined setting. The movie's raw and unflinching portrayal of life in a jail offers a stark look at the inner workings of the penal system and the individuals caught within its grasp.

    The performances in Short Eyes are nothing short of extraordinary, with a talented cast bringing depth and authenticity to their roles. The character development is compelling, drawing viewers into the intertwined lives of the inmates and exploring themes of morality, redemption, and survival.

    What sets Short Eyes apart is its ability to provoke deep emotions and challenge conventional perspectives. The movie's disturbing moments force audiences to confront uncomfortable truths about society and human behavior, making it a truly unforgettable viewing experience.

    Overall, Short Eyes is a powerful and unforgettable movie that leaves a lasting impact on its audience. Despite its unsettling nature, the movie's honesty and depth make it a must-watch for those seeking thought-provoking cinema that pushes boundaries and sparks meaningful discussions.
  • I warn you, beware, this prison drama is not advised for the squeamish. It is brutal, disturbing, nasty. The tale of a young White man falsely accused of a child rape who is sent in jail, just in the middle of Puerto ricains and Black inmates, all aware of what this young man was accused of. With expected results...I repeat, this is a terrific, outstanding movie, and unfortunately unknown from the large audiences. It is a shame because it sounds realistic. I don't think it is inspired from actual events, but I am sure that such things already happened. A milestone in jail stories for me, but underrated for my taste.