User Reviews (2)

Add a Review

  • When this movie was made, there was either no actual Pussycat Ranch or it wasn't well-known...the setting is a working ranch (if a failing one) that is not, when things start, supposed to be a whorehouse.

    Chacun à son goût, but I find the women prettier than the usual run, not all of them made that many movies, one sex-scene was a little unusual for its time (there was very little anal sex in American pornography then, and it was typically the province of B-list actresses crying-out in pain), a socially-redeeming warning about moonshine, and in the year of its making it stood-out nicely.

    There was good cinematography, a plot, hilariously bad pseudo-attempts at humour, and both terrible but original music and some stolen from the best.
  • Obviously pure filler ground out by prolific pornographer John Christopher, PUSSYCAT RANCH fails to deliver on its promised whorehouse premise. It's as bad (and trivial) as the recent Helen Mirren/Joe Pesci mega-dud vanity production on the subject.

    Most of the film is about a farm family's antics, warring with the landlord trying to foreclose; dealing with most unlikely outlaws on horseback Eric Edwards and Joey Silvera, and a digression into bank robbing. Seemingly as an afterthought, late in the proceedings Samantha Fox comes up with the bright idea of opening a whorehouse to raise the mortgage money. Way too late to justify the film's moniker.

    Chalk this one up in the lowest 10 percentile of its big-name stars' career choices.