User Reviews (299)

Add a Review

  • 1941 is a unique movie. 1 part of it is animal house-esque lowbrow humor, 1 part is B-movie love story, and 1 part stoic war movie, and 2 parts insane hilarity.

    It is a weird mix to say the least.

    First, the problems: 1. The first half of the movie is slow. It grinds on making you wonder why you're watching this movie.

    2. The "Love story" subplot is poorly executed for what this movie is trying to do.

    3. many of the actors are not used to their fullest potential (especially Dan Akroyd and John Candy) while others receive excessive screen time. (see: The slow moving love story sub-plot) But then there are the good aspects: 1. John Belushi is hilarious. He would have been funnier had he interacted with more characters rather than appearing in many solo shots, but he was funny.

    2. The "Epic Battle" was great. It had me laughing as my sides hurt.

    3. Slim Pickens: His appearance in the movie was truly where the movie stopped being slow, and the fun really started. He was great in his scenes and between the dialogue and his visual scenes, you can't help but laugh.

    There's more, but in short, if you don't mind sitting through a slow build up, the payoff is worth the wait.

    It's not the best movie ever, but in the barren entertainment landscape that is Weekend Television: Finding this movie can be like an oasis in the desert. It's solid Saturday afternoon fun.
  • moviemik-311 May 2001
    Any movie that features the following....:

    1. The Geek from "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" torturing The Mayor from "Jaws" 2. A bunch of Japanese soldiers disguised as walking Christmas Trees 3. A hilarious USO dance sequence that boils over into an inter-service street fight 4. the film debut of Mickey Rourke and the big film debut of John Candy

    and last but not least

    5. Tough guy Robert Stack crying and singing along to songs from the Disney classic "Dumbo".....

    CANNOT BE ALL BAD!!!!!
  • Very loud, very big and very funny fictional account of a supposed Japanese invasion of Los Angeles in 1941, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. There are many plotlines throughout the film--too many to summarize here. Basically, this is the most unusual Spielberg film I've ever seen (and his only bomb). It's from the bigger is funnier school of humor--Spielberg's only big comedy. There's lots of gunfire, lots of fights, lots of screaming (in full stereo) and tons of destruction (an entire amusement park is destroyed, a few city blocks of Los Angeles and a big beautiful house). As for the acting--it varies wildly. Tim Matheson plays a lt. who has the hots for Nancy Allen who only gets excited in moving planes--they're both cute and funny. Dan Aykroyd is wasted. John Belushi is annoying. Robert Stack is amusing. Ned Beatty and Lorraine Gary are funny, but underused. Treat Williams is violent and very unfunny. And where else can you see Christopher Lee play a German? The film is too long (I saw the 2 1/2 director's cut) and it doesn't always work...but when it does, it's hilarious! A definite highlight is the jitterbug sequence--unfortunately, it has a violent conclusion in which a very likable character is punched out three times. Terrific John Williams score too. The ending credits are quite interesting--it shows each cast character screaming! You may hate this film, but it's definetely a one of a kind. It's a cult classic in Europe.
  • Steven Speilberg once asked a friend of mine, "Why didn't anyone like this movie?" Well, I think that I can answer that - "1941" is a gigantic in-joke. The people who are in on the joke are people who, like myself, have an oversized love and knowledge of the city of Los Angeles and it's history. I think that in the vast, world-wide movie-going public, this group probably comprises 1%. For that group, "1941" has a wonderful nostalgia value. And for the people in that 1% that have a twisted sense of humor and enjoy seeing nostalgic L.A. blown to bits, this movie really delivers. By the way, the folks with that twisted sense of humor probably account for about 1% of the original 1%.

    I don't know why, but having grown up in L.A. and being an aficionado of it's history, I find it funny to see planes in a dogfight over Hollywood Blvd, the ferris wheel rolling off the end of Santa Monica Pier, and aircraft crashing into the La Brea Tarpits. But for non-locals and people unfamiliar with the paranoia that gripped Southern California in the wake of Pearl Harbor, this movie will likely seem confusing and silly. To the history buff with a twisted sense of humor (like me, proud member of the 1% of the 1%), the movie is not only amusing, but sometimes surprisingly accurate, historically. Robert Stack plays General Joseph Stillwell - a very real historical figure in L.A. history. Stack even bears a striking resemblance to the real General Stillwell. The whole movie is based upon a few real-life incidents of panicky anti-aircraft fire that occurred over L.A. in 1941/1942, as well as a Japanese sub that actually shelled an oil refinery near Santa Barbara. Like "Chinatown" (a film mistakenly thought to be an accurate account of L.A. water politics in the 1930s), "1941" borrows from real-life history and distorts it into pure fabrication. The difference is that while "Chinatown" is a noir drama, "1941" is an over-the-top comedy. Both films appeal to the historian, but as it is often said, comedy is much harder to pull off than drama. You either love "1941", or sit though it, saying, "huh?".
  • While I have a middle of the road attitude about this movie, like others I respond more often to individual scenes rather than whole movies, of which there were a few here. One that sings in my memory is General Stillwell (Robert Stack)discovering that "Dumbo" is playing in in the theater of the town that he has just entered, then seated we see him reacting to the song "When I See and Elephant Fly" by mouthing the words, then looking around a little sheepishly to see if anyone has seen him doing this. The scene is precious, and the part was perfect for him in that, not being noted as a comic actor, he is able to counterpoint his Untouchable image with one that is both untouchable and vulnerable.
  • I was really excited to see 1941 when it turned out to be on Bravo's 100 Funniest Movies, not to mention that when I looked at the cover at Hollywood Video, this movie had Dan Aykroyd, John Candy, John Belushi, among some of Hollywood's greatest actors. Now the fact that Steven Spielberg directed the movie got me more excited. When I checked out the rating for 1941, I got scared, I mean 5.5 isn't that exciting. Especially for a Spielberg film, usually most people get excited and love the film. Now granted, Spielberg was never the king of comedies, but 1941 is a decent film that gives you a few laughs, it's just a screw ball comedy, I admit some jokes are a little random, but over all this is a film that works and is just plain fun. Yes, it's a bit long and sometimes a little odd, the story though was something that was fun because sometimes we just need a little fun with history.

    It's 6 days after the Pearl Harbor bombing and now the Japenese are coming after United State's pride and joy, Hollywood, lol. Basically, we just go through California citizen's lives and what they are going through. We have the wacky couple who can't seem to stay together. A silly guy with huge pride for his country. An army who seems to have a hard time getting how to actually fight. A crazed air pilot, crazy German captains, along with the Japenese who invaded the country are dressed up as Christmas trees. Well, let's just hope that they'll be alright with this silly invasion.

    1941 is at times very random and doesn't know wither to be a mental comedy or a screwball comedy, but it still delivers a good laugh to those who are just looking for a fun movie. Don't go by the rating here on IMDb, I actually had fun watching this film and I'm not sure why people are giving it a hard time. But it looks like the cast had a genuinely good time making this film. The story is a bit much to follow, but it's worth a watch at least. 1941 is all in good fun, so just grab the popcorn and have a few laughs, I'm sure you'll get it with at least John Belushi's character.

    7/10
  • I vividly recall the (packed) audience's reaction at the end of 1941: eerie stunned silence... then some guy yelled "what the hell WAS that?" and laughter erupted. I'm a huge Spielberg fan, but 1941 is just wretched excess. It's loud, destructive, unfunny and plot less (it's strictly situational). It's also a bit painful to watch all the now deceased wasted talent (Murray Hamilton, Lionel Stander, Wendy Jo Sperber, Belushi, The great Slim Pickens, Toshiro Mifune, Samuel Fuller, Bob Stack & others...). The film's uncredited cameos are strange (Penny Marshall? James Caan? Lenny & Squiggy from Penny's series??? C'mon...) This was a monumental waste of time, talent & piles of money. (1) unfunny star/10.
  • A spectacular , sprawling comedy in which hysteria grips California , it is packed with a big cast , entertainment and amusement . Californians prepare for a Japanese invasion in the days after Pearl Harbor . Chaos erupts all over the state in the wake of the bombing , as a family , formed by a father (Ned Beatty) , mother (Lorraine Gary) and sons prepare for an imagined invasion . An assorted misfit group of soldiers (sergeant : Dan Aykroyd , Privates : Treat Williams , John Candy , Frank McRae , among others) attempt to make the coast defensible against an possible Japanese invasion . Crew of a Japanese submarine under command a stiff captain (Toshiro Mifune) scout out the L.A. coast , along with a German officer (Christopher Lee) and they have picked Hollywood as their own target . An Army General (Robert Stack), civilian defenders , deranged Privates , a nutty pilot (John Belushi) and many others all end up on the way of a lost Japanese submarine .

    This big budget brought by great Production Companies as Universal and Columbia is starred by an all-star-cast and proved to be the most expensive comedy of all time , 35.000 dollars . This lavish film combines rip-roaring , noisy action , adventure , tongue-in-cheek and lots of action and undisciplined humor . The movie gets entertained and hilarious moments here and there , with some side-splitting situations . This slapstick contains funny scenes , though slowdown and laughters come quickly . The depiction of L.A. in the chaotic after the bombing of Pearl Harbor blends elements of black humor , action and fantasy . However , it contains some flaws , gaps and humorous set-pieces are badly developed . Spielberg here shows he could bomb out the best of them when he made this uneven comedy with regular sense of staging and average pacing , including the silly scenes between Tim Matheson and Nancy Allen . Top-of-the-range star cast who includes veteran secondaries as Toshiro Mifune , Christopher Lee , Elisa Cook Jr , Slim Pickens , Lionel Stander ; furthermore cameos of notorious filmmakers as Samuel Fuller , John Landis and Penny Marshall . Special mention to John Belushi as an absolute disaster pilot , everything he touches turns to ashes . Superbly orchestrated comedy/adventure by the maestro John Williams , as always . Colorful and evocative cinematography by William A Fraker . The picture was nominated for three Oscars but achieved none . In spite of ¨1941¨ was a flop and failed at the box office , very few filmmakers can boast a string of successes as gigantic as Steven Spielberg , an excellent director with his knowledge of the mechanics of cinema gets entertainment and amusement who placed him right at the top of Hollywood tree such as ¨Jaws , Close encounters in third phase , Raiders of the lost ark and its sequels , Empire of the Sun , Purple color , Saving Private Ryan , Munich ¨ and many others .
  • Steven Spielberg was, like many people, part of my childhood, and to this day 'Jaws', 'ET', 'Raiders of the Lost Ark', 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' are still favourites. 'Schindler's List' is also a masterpiece, and 'Jurassic Park' still leaves me awestruck with the revolutionary dinosaur effects.

    Despite being widely regarded as Spielberg's biggest disaster, am personally not of the opinion that '1941' is quite his worst film. It's one of his worst, and on reflection his most disappointing considering the ideas and the talent, but to me 'The Lost World' (both that and the third were a disgrace to the original 'Jurassic Park') gets that dishonourable title.

    '1941' has its moments where it succeeds. Technically, it looks fabulous, being beautifully shot (wasn't crazy about the dance scene in general but the cinematography in the scene was impossible to find fault with) and audaciously designed. John Williams delivers yet another rousing music score, not one of his better efforts but a very good and perfectly fitting within the film one all the same.

    A few good scenes and standout performances. The ferris wheel and house destruction scenes are technical marvels, are wonderfully anarchic and extremely funny, and even more so the opening of the Coke and Slim Pickens scenes. Mustn't forget the 'Jaws' parody either. Of the cast, faring best are a wonderfully crazed John Belushi (a nothing part but Belushi makes the most of it), a hilarious Slim Pickens, Robert Stack as an army general who loves Dumbo, a nerdy and madcap Eddie Deezen and a wonderfully stoic Christopher Lee.

    Others don't fare so well though. John Candy has nothing to do and looks bored, Dan Aykroyd is similarly wasted in a slapstick that is far too over-the-top and busy to find much entertainment value in, Treat Williams overdoes the aggressive condescension of his character and comes over as an irritating bully, Tim Mattheson and Nancy Allen are pretty bland and while good Lorraine Gray and Ned Beatty are underused.

    Furthermore, '1941' suffers from being bloated and trying far too hard. It has too many characters, most of which either have very little to do or are sketchy at best or feature too much with not much interesting at all. Likewise there are also too many plot-lines, which gives the film a too busy and sprawling structure at times, the worst faring one being the love story subplot that just grinds the film to a halt and is truly dull.

    Humour wise, '1941' has moments where it's funny, but too much of it is too loud, too over-egged, sloppily timed and gratuitously vulgar (this kind of humour has worked very well in other films like 'Animal House' but in those instances the timing was much sharper and less manic). The film takes far too long to properly get going, with the appearance of Slim Pickens being where it properly shows signs of coming to life. Despite the dazzling cinematography and a suitably intense brawl, the dance scene is not that interesting and goes on forever. The dialogue is crass and left me stone-faced rather than crying my eyes out laughing.

    Spielberg shows expertise on the technical and visual front, but when it comes to momentum and keeping control of the too many plot strands and characters he fails and shows himself less than natural with comedy.

    Overall, not a complete disaster but a lesser Spielberg effort that tries far too hard. While it succeeds in a few areas it fails badly in many others. 3/10 Bethany Cox
  • Undoubtedly, this is one of Spielberg's most personal productions. When I say 'personal,' I mean a film that the director has made taking into account his own interests in World War II history (which he later demonstrated his ability to magnificently portray in the movie 'Saving Private Ryan'), his love for Los Angeles and Hollywood. The movie is a grand jest, created without sparing any economic or technical means, where Spielberg's most outlandish ideas find their place in his imagination.

    Technically, it's undoubtedly a magnificent film, with incredible sequences for its time. Narratively, apart from the visual gags, it's quite a simple movie filled with absurd situations, a comedy of the utmost absurdity.

    It undoubtedly reminds me of Richard Lester's 1967 film titled 'How I Won the War,' with John Lennon's presence as a supporting actor. Spielberg has surely been inspired by this eccentric English production, although I believe it doesn't reach the level of subtle British humor. Spielberg's film is actually more based on the display of technical means than on dialogues.

    '1941' is a very difficult film to evaluate because within it, we recognize Spielberg's great professionalism, although the overall result is not considered masterful by many critics. In fact, many consider it Spielberg's worst movie.

    Another parallel that can be drawn is between Spielberg and Kubrick. Both first made a war-themed movie with a result that, according to general opinion, was not very successful. Then, both directed war movies that are considered masterpieces of the genre.

    Kubrick first directed a strange and inconsistent 'Fear and Desire' in 1952, his very first feature film, only to direct the masterful 'Full Metal Jacket' nineteen years later in 1971. The same nineteen years that passed between '1941' and Spielberg's 'Saving Private Ryan'
  • Warning: Spoilers
    First off I have to mention all of the wonderful actors that did such a great job; Lucille Benson (reprising a role from DUEL), Slim Pickens, Susan Backlinie (reprising her role from JAWS), Ned Beatty, Dan Aykroyd, John Belushi, Murray Hamilton, Robert Stack, Christopher Lee, John Candy, Toshiro Mifone, Warren Oates, Elisha Cook, Jr, Eddie Deezen, Dub Taylor, Joe Flaherty, Don Calfa, Dick Miller and small roles and cameos for people like James Caan, Samuel Fuller, John Landis, Mickey Rourke (in his film debut), Michael McKean and David Lander together but not as Lenny and Squiggy, also from Laverne & Shirley we have Penny Marshall, and of course in my opinion the movies true star was Bobby Dicicco.

    Actors I didn't like but I will include are Tim Matheson and Nancy Allen as well as Treat Williams. I normally like Treat but he was awful in this film.

    This movie is basically a lighthearted spoof of events that actually did happen at various times during the early 40's. The Japanese did try to invade LA, and airplanes were shot at thinking it was a Japanese raid. Zoot suiters did battle it out with USO boys and many events here are all true just put together for this movie.

    As far as the plot to the movie, its basically about the Japanese along with a Nazi comrade trying to invade Los Angelas. The great General Stillwell is in town and trying to watch a movie, his soldiers are at a USO party. One soldier is trying to get a girl, but another kid named Wally wants her more. Another soldier is flying a plane trying to get a woman to sleep with him because she loves planes. There is a lot of weird things going on in here that should make it interesting, but it doesn't. Just random events that all connect to the threat of an invasion.

    Spielberg directed this movie and its considered his biggest flop, with good reasoning. It offers nothing, its a mess, its very sloppy. I only laughed once and that was at the Slim Pickens part and director Brian DePalma actually contributed that section. Pickens also spoofs his own self from DR. STRANGELOVE. The movie opens with a spoof of JAWS with the original woman playing her part.

    awe what to say...the movie was a mess, I hated the score by John Williams, the direction offered nothing, actors were many, but characters were few, the screenplay was silly and the scenes were flawed...

    I wouldn't recommend it to a single person...it was really bad 1/10 stars
  • You can't have lofty aspirations all the time.

    Even the director of such powerful films as "Jaws", "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", "ET" and "Schindler's List" has to take a break from all the serious issues in his films and play dumb at least once.

    Just look at "1941".

    With a plotline straight out of The Three Stooges and special effects befitting a WWII epic, "1941" abandons all pretense by parodying the opening of "Jaws" right off the bat and hitting every slapstick point from there on in. Spielberg knew that even if this turned out be a flop, it would be a good-natured one.

    Just look at this cast! Not only are Aykroyd and Belushi at the helm, but there's talent like Matheson, Allen, Oates, Williams, Beatty, Gary (Roy Scheider's wife from the "Jaws" films), Candy, Flaherty, Stack (in his first comedic turn before "Airplane!"), Lee, Pickens, Deezen (a comic genius if ever there was one), Sperber and a whole herd of other I probably missed. All of them in the midst of the hugest battlefield of comic carnage ever seen.

    And no wonder. "1941" was co-written by Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale, Spielberg protogees who went on to further success with the "Back to the Future" films, "Who Framed Roger Rabbit", "Used Cars", (all with climaxes as wild as the entire running time of "1941") and the vastly under-appreciated "Death Becomes Her". Even John Milius (director/co-writer of "Conan the Barbarian") lends his pen hand.

    In the end, you'll be dazzled, breathless, stunned and amazed, but by no means bored. And, with any luck, amused.

    "1941" - it was a very good year.

    Nine stars. And don't worry: it's all for the good of the war effort.
  • In Spielberg's first Second World War movie he takes a rather unusual look at the period, especially when now we know what emotional brilliance he later brought to the screen. 1941 is a crazy slapstick comedy! It is a combination of 3 young filmmakers full of energy and excitement as they brace the film industry. The screenplay is written by Robert Zemeckis, Bob Gale, and John Milius, of which separately created films such as Back To The Future, Apocalypse Now, and Forrest Gump. I do personally think that 1941 is a good film that is very harshly rated. It is on the same comedic format of films like Airplane and Naked Gun.

    Industry folk in the late 70s seemed to desperately want Spielberg to fail. This fresh filmmaker created the summer blockbuster and cinema's highest grossing movie ever made (at the time), surely he couldn't keep going? For me I believe he does, it is not an exceptional movie but it is definitely entertaining. Spielberg's movies tend to linger around or above the 2 hour mark, however, this one would have benefited from a shorter length. Around the 90 minute mark would have knitted the story more tightly together and took out any of the unnecessary loose ends.

    There are a plethora of characters involved in 1941, which maybe adds to the dislike of this film. Some characters feel like a recurring joke from a sketch show, simply being used for a quick laugh before the story continues. John Belushi and Dan Aykroyd are tagged as the big stars on the DVD cover but neither of which contribute to the story nor are exceptionally funny. John Belushi's character was supposed to be very minor at first but when Belushi was cast they decided to make his role more prominent, however, I feel this was a mistake. Belushi does a couple of comedy gags here and there but he is possibly the most unnecessary character of them all, destroying the flow of any story that there is in this film. Dan Aykroyd is also very forgettable, playing another questionable character in regards to his contribution to the story.

    Spielberg himself later stated that what killed the comedy from 1941 was the amount of destruction and the noise level that drowned any humour out of it. Originally, the character of Wally (Bobby Di Cicco) was supposed to make an impact on everyone else within the story, which would have created a structural link, however, Bob Gale (screenwriter) said that this was lost in post production. This unfortunately leads us with a mix of differing characters that do not really have any relation to each other leading us to question their purpose. In the end we do not particularly care about what happens to the characters, which shows the lack of character depth implemented, but they are enjoyable to watch and mostly all likeable. We are only watching for the comedic set pieces, which it does deliver on.

    Parts of the film were apparently based on real events according to Bob Gale. It is true that Los Angeles believed that there was a Japanese plane above in '41, so they started shooting into the sky, but in fact nothing at all was there! I like the idea of this as it keeps the comedy, knowing that some parts actually happened. The special effects are also brilliant as with any Spielberg film, especially considering it is without CG, however, as Spielberg himself said in later years this may be its downfall. Too much effects and too many explosions!

    Altogether, the film did get some bad reviews, but it was NOT a box office flop. Columbia and Universal both came away happy with the profits it made, and I think it's a rather good, fun, and crazy film too. For any haters of this film at least you can surely admit that Spielberg made it up to you by bringing out a cinema classic just two years later with Indiana Jones...
  • 1941 is the only comedy movie I've ever seen that was utterly and completely devoid of humor of any type. Jaws was much funnier than this movie. Carrot Top is funnier than this movie. Staring at a pile of sand is funnier than this movie. I sat stonefaced, completely numb while the noise and crashing images cascaded down upon me. The effect was weird, like watching the last episode of Seinfeld. A dentist could have removed my wisdom teeth without anesthetic and I would not have felt a thing.

    Stupefyingly awful.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    1941 is considered to be Steven Spileberg's folly, a screwball farce about the Japanese invading America after pearl harbour, starring some of the greatest actors and comedians that ever lived. Some people hate it, I love it. Sorry for all you haters, but I guess the things I like are the things you dislike, but for the life of me, I can't understand why this movie is considered Spielberg's worst movie. For one, it's watchable, and for another, it's not full of Spielberg Schmaltz, (the thing i hate most about Senior Speilbergo's later movies, i.e Hook, Always, AI).

    Treat Williams is an a$$hole but no-one plays a$$holes better (see; things to do in Denver when your dead), Robert Stack crying while watching Dumbo when a full scale dogfight rages outside the theatre, Ned Beatty destroying his house in an attempt to fight the Japanese, Slim Pickens faking doing a sh!t while Toshiro Mifune and Christopher Lee wait to find out if he's passed a compass. I'm sorry but but those are all comedic gems. Okay, so Belushi is wasted and is seemingly in this move for no reason, but Belushi in a cockpit without a bottle opener is funnier than anything with Sean William Scott in it. For me this movie hits all the right notes, and on reflection makes some very good points (the two numbskull's who mistakenly think Belushi's plane is a German fighter...the paranoia of anyone living in a coastal town after pearl harbour).

    Give it another chance, then watch Jaws if you still don't like it.
  • I'm not sure I'll want to sit too soon again through 1941, directed by Steven Spielberg and written by Robert Zemeckis, Bob Gale and John Milius, but I wouldn't trade the experience. Unlike directors nowadays who go BIG and HUGE with action and cheesy comedy and thrills, and their movies end up possibly leaving a really lousy residue from a kind of soulessness (Michael Bay comes immediately to mind), Spielberg may go way over the top, and in the DVD version I saw it goes on far too long (whether or not the special edition solves the problems left in the original 2 hour cut boggles my mind just to think about it), but it never loses a sense of giddy excitement, like a 12 year old boy given free reign over the controls of a nose-thumbing, immature-yet-intelligent big-budget Hollywood action-war-comedy. For more than a few moments watching it, I thought of what Francis Ford Coppola said regarding the making of Apocalypse Now, when he said "we had too much money, too much equipment, and little by little we went insane." I wondered how much Spielberg decided to shoot- and shoot and shoot- from the script, though whatever mishaps occur in the picture (and for the most part goes on in the latter half of the film), yet he somehow pulls out a few really extraordinary sequences, and more than few deserved laughs.

    It's chaos, basically, when less than a week after the bombing of Pearl Harbor the threat of an attack from the Japanese seems imminent. Everybody's up in arms, or at least up in arms with one another (again, the 12 year-old aspect, both with plenty of explosions, weapons firing off, and more than a bit of innuendo), and we're given practically an Altman-esquire view of Los Angeles in this time of wacky despair, even if oddly enough most of what really makes of LA is left away. Then again, any big mash of reality would compact the escapist madhouse Spielberg and his writers intend. Only in a flick like 1941 would you get a bat-s*** pilot (a hilarious John Belushi), a timid but ready average guy with a gigantic machine gun in his backyard (Ned Beatty), a doubting Thomas General who cries when he watches Dumbo (Robert Stack), two army personnel (Tim Matheson and Nancy Allen) who have a deranged courtship involving air travel, and the actual (yet more-so potential) threat to the LA area, a Japanese submarine headed by Colonel Mikamura (Toshrio Mifune, who in a limited role gets to do what he does best- look down-right perturbed). It all leads up to a gigantic- and I do mean gigantic- climax that goes on and on and on with the crazed, war-seeking Americans finally finding their sights at the sub.

    Perhaps if Spielberg and his editors decided to try and tighten it up (and again I say this after the extended version, perhaps this is maybe a tad different with the shorter theatrical cut), it would be a much greater rush of insanity in wartime comedy. A topic like the delirium of Americans on the cusp of war is good for a variety of broad styles (if that makes sense), and the cast assembled here is more hit than miss (where else will you get Christopher Lee as a Nazi on a sub who can somehow have no problem communicating with the Japanese speaking Japanese!), with the goofy parts still retaining moments of levity. And the madness that usually unfolds on screen, be it small-time or large scale, gets the right treatment at least on the directorial front. There's a dance-hall sequence involving the main romantic love triangle (I forget all the names, though I remember Treat Williams being involved), where the fighting blends with the dancing and completely absurd homaging to a point of delirious genius, and it's one of Spielberg's greatest single sequences from the 70s. I even got a couple of chuckles at his blatant, irrevocable homages to his previous films (the opening with Jaws, certain shots right from Close Encounters, even a few unintentional allusions to future films).

    But again that frigging script, and the abandonment to pull back from the crazily cartoonish atmosphere, sort of damns it in the last section, where more seems to mean better, even when what might be expected (more explosions) doesn't quite come off. It ended up becoming almost an act of annoying the viewer, where already there's been so many scenes of hundreds of people in single shots, stretched into sequences, and grand-standings (Aykroyd's part) and wild flights of fancy, that even the best parts end up becoming mired in the thick of it all. I guess maybe it's meant to almost feel like a war in and of itself, but unlike the Coppola picture I mentioned previously, there isn't a lot of art to come out of the sensationalism, just some fun times to have with friends and a very good sense of humor (mostly a forgiving one). This all being said, however, I wouldn't tell you not to see it, most likely if you're a fan of Spielberg and Zemeckis, and I end up recommending it against my better judgment, or rather I don't recommend if as much as the MUCH better works of the filmmakers, but for a certain comic sensibility it might be real gold. I will remember the zany brilliance, but I also won't be able to shake off the fact that it is the sort of midway minor blunder of a filmmaker right in an awe-inspiring stretch of films. 6.5/10
  • This is a crazy slapstick movie. Jim Belushi at his best. Ackroyd, Williams all fun.

    The whole time I was watching I was thinking how Trump would run a real war. A fantastic simulation!! 😅
  • I grew up on Spielberg flicks, love his style ET, Jaws, Close Encounters, Jurrassic Park, etc.

    Just saw this movie for the first time. I was completely shocked at how bad it was.

    The storyline, the characters, the whole thing is just BAD. I was bored out of my mind.

    No redeeming qualities, unbelievable amounts of money spent on NOTHING.

    Not funny.

    Speillberg blew it big time on this one.

    It was cool to see all the old, 80's comedians when John Candy & Belushi were still alive.

    You are not missing anything here
  • I've never been to LA in my life and I'm a real supporter of this movie. Don't think I agree with the "1%" theory - its more like 20% of movie buffs are fanatical supporters and the rest hate it. Was the ratio similar with "Its a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World" I wonder ?. Perhaps there is a mini-genre of cameo packed, totally overblown, stupid slapstick ("EPIC SLAPSTICK" ?) movies... but I can't think of any more.

    Favourite bit - Dan Ackroyds on-the-fly impression of THE FLY
  • "1941" is known for being a flop, and Steven Spielberg's only significant black mark on his resume. At least, that used to be the reputation, since thanks to sites like IMDb even every film on the bottom 100 has its share of fans...And that is exactly where "1941" should be.

    This film belongs in the EXACT same company with "Ishtar" and "Hudson Hawk". It is shrill, overproduced, and obnoxious in its arrogance that it is funny. But it is not. It is an overlong, bloated, worthless piece of trash. All the positive reviews on here actually make me angry! This is literally one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Every St. Patrick's day me and my friends have a party and watch all the Leprechaun films to date (up to 6 or 7 at this point I forget). Getting that deep down the pipeline with horror films about Leprechaun's would seem about as low as films can go. But no. Even low-budget trash can be enjoyable in a fun way. But this film is no fun. It is loud, in your face, and dares you to enjoy it. Well I don't.

    There are good points, but they just make the rest of the 2hr 20 min film seem even more of a drag. You have better things to do with your life than watch this move. Stay far away, please!
  • Steven Spielberg's brand new take on comedy might be effective at times, considering how risky his use of over-the-top slapstick turns in the end, escalating until concluding in a extravagant and exaggerated third act, also including a compellingly funny cast, but with a certain use of absurdity in its humor, this could result in either a love it-or hate it- entry in the director's filmography, also considering its profane themes towards a sensitive subject as World War II.
  • h-martin-525-56585810 November 2012
    There may be a list of the most expensive films ever made. There may be a list of the most stupid films every made.

    This film is a kind of magical coalition. I am not sure if it is the most expensive stupidest film every made. Or the most stupid expensive film ever made.

    The cost of paying just the lead actors for one day on the set would have been more than the total budget of many Australian feature films. Perhaps if I were ten years old I may have thought the film funny.

    Perhaps if I had fallen asleep 30 seconds after the opening and woken up thirty seconds before the end I may have thought the film enjoyable.

    The film is so bad that it is memorable. If you are the kind of person who has had a tooth pulled and then can't resist continually poking the hole with your tongue then this may be the film for you.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Delighted to get a region 1 version DVD of this film as its been unavailable in the UK on any format. I first saw this about 1989 on a late Sunday night and loved it. Seen it several times since and am delighted to see this movie but featuring added scenes not included on the theatrical cut. There are about 5-6 different plot threads which dovetail nicely as the movie progresses but essentially i think it comes down to three main stories. Los Angeles, 1941 and in the wake of Pearl Harbour Americans are coming to terms with the paranoia and fear of a possible Japanese invasion. There's Army Captain Tim Matheson desperate to get Nancy Allen up in an airplane where she will be sexually responsive to his advances. Then you have civilian Ned Beatty discovering the Army want to put an AA gun in his yard. In the mean time, Beatty's daughter is being wooed by two men, civilian dancer Bobby DiCicco and aggressive soldier Treat Williams who fight for her against the backdrop of a fabulously arranged swingdance sequence. All this whilst a Japanese submarine is submerging off the Californian coast. Throw in a dozen other wonderful characters and performances and you've got a terrific ensemble cast. The additional scenes flesh out some plots and characters not really explained in the theatrical release. Its loud, noisy and beautiful to look at. You'll either love it or hate it. I love it and was delighted to find that when screening this for my girlfriend she liked it as well. An underrated Spielberg classic.
  • Though it's not quite the disaster that many would claim, 1941 is certainly not one of Steven Spielberg's finest moments. The film is a grand scale collection of bit parts and physical humor that just don't quite add up to a winner.

    The film centers around the paranoia of the people of southern California in the days immediately following the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor. The characters in this film all seem to think that an attack on the US mainland is inevitable. Some of the characters even think the Japs are already here! Maybe this wasn't such a good idea for a comedy from the outset. The attack at Pearl Harbor was a terrifying and devastating day in the country's history. It would be understandable if it put the citizens on the west coast on edge to some degree. It hardly matters however. The laughs this film generates mostly come from the continuous and at time extremely elaborate physical gags and property destruction. There are a lot of things that get destroyed as this film plays itself out. Gas stations, cars, planes, houses; even an amusement park gets destroyed. The ferris wheel actually goes rolling down a pier and into the ocean! There are too many characters and subplots to list. Most generate at least a few chuckles. The one involving Slim Pickens is probably the best. The crew of a Japanese submarine sneak ashore and take him prisoner. He swallows the only working compass on board, and their attempts to get it out of him are truly hilarious. Robert Stack, as a general whose biggest concern is making sure nobody disturbs him while he's attending a screening of Dumbo, is also very good. Dan Aykroyd and John Belushi pretty much play themselves, but unfortunately share little screen time together! The musical score by John Williams is terrific, though. It's too bad that since this movie failed at the box office, many people have probably never heard it. The director's cut that Netflix sent me is almost two and a half hours long, and that's just too long for a comedy. There are some good visual payoffs, but the story just takes too long to get where it needs to go.

    Call this one a "nice try" from Spielberg. Much better things would come in the years immediately following this film for him. I would not for a moment discourage anyone from seeing this film, but you will probably not consider it a classic in any way. If you want a great comedy involving property damage, stick with the Blues Brothers instead! 6 of 10 stars.

    The Hound.
  • I don't think Steven Spielberg knew what kind of movie he wanted 1941 to be. In fact, I don't really know how to describe it. It's as if Spielberg half-heartedly slopped a story together and then hired some of the greatest comedians of the time, hoping their jokes would save it. They didn't. The humor in this film falls flat on its face almost every time. This is a terrible movie. It's astounding to think it came just after Jaws and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, yet just before Raiders of the Lost Ark and E.T. Maybe this movie is why Spielberg doesn't do comedies.
An error has occured. Please try again.