User Reviews (30)

Add a Review

  • According to the Citadel Film series book on Sean Connery, Sean violated a rule that both he and Charlton Heston normally follow, never take an assignment on an unfinished script. The cameras were rolling on the players before the final script was done and the results clearly show it.

    Cuba as a film certainly had potential, but it's not realized in this story. Sean Connery plays a British mercenary who is going to go to work for the tottering Batista regime. He's being hired on the strength of good work he did in Malaya where the British did successfully quell a Communist insurgency in the Fifties.

    Connery's got a lot of reservations when he sees the quality of the troops that Batista has. But that's not what's totally occupying his mind. He's found an old flame in Brooke Adams who is married to wealthy Cuban cigar factory owner Chris Sarandon.

    As a film Cuba veers back and forth between an action adventure, a political tract, and a romance novel, never really settling in any one category. Best performance in the film is that of Jack Weston who plays the archetypal ugly American.

    It's a sad film Cuba, because it had the potential to be a whole lot better.
  • An enjoyable thriller, which although filmed in Spain, manages to capture the atmosphere and lunacy of the last days of Batista's dictatorship perfectly. Probably a contractual purposes project on the behalf of director Lester, he manages to inject just enough of his own idiosyncratic style to lift this adventure flick out of the run of the mill. Connery is totally convincing in his role as Brit counter-insurgency advisor/mercenary. Brook Adams is stunning. Good anglo-american supporting cast. Plot begins to lose its impetus about a reel before the end, and at a running time of nearly two hours, is overlong. But well worth renting the video. Socialists will not find its political interpetation of events offensive, but may be puzzled or angered by the soundtrack over the final titles - as a victorious Fidel approaches the podium, chants of 'Fidel! Fidel!' are over dubbed with a Nuremberg chorus of 'Sieg Heil!'. Discuss.
  • Richard Nester's 'Cuba' is set in the 1950's just in the Civil war against Batista's government...

    Sean Connery stars as a free British counter-terrorist whom Batista's associates hope will help them beat Castro's revolutionaries...

    Connery quickly figures out, almost as soon as he landed in the exotic and dangerous island, that the revolution will succeed and replace one elite with another... He gets much more interest in following an old sweetheart, and when the two see each other, memories of his first love affair come flooding back...

    Connery begins to remember when he was once deeply and ridiculously in love with her... The 'woman in red' that passed before his eyes in Havana's airport terminal was the most exotic, breath-stopping creature he had ever known... Now she is Alexandra Pulido (Brooke Adams), a highly ambitious woman who runs a cigar factory while her husband flirts with other women...

    Chris Sarandon is the profligate son of one of Cuba's wealthiest men, and the charming playboy in the romantic triangle who knows everything about Havana, 'every casino, every table, and every bed in it!'

    Martin Balsam is the general in the corrupt Batista regime, who intends to ask Castro to 'get rid of the Communists.'

    Hector Elizondo is the junior officer who realizes late in life why few were sorry about the fall of Batista...

    Jack Weston is the fat American businessman impressed by the cigar factory...

    Lonette McKee is the ardent lover who rejects all the ways of behavior in Cuba...

    Danny De la Paz is the very bad brother with a handgun license...

    Alejandro Rey is a money-grubbing menace who puts his personal ambition over public safety...

    Denholm Elliott is the soldier of fortune who buys an old airplane so quickly...

    Walter Gotell is the unfeeling father who is quite separate from the businesses run by his daughter in law...

    In 'Cuba', Richard Lester reveals a likable if none too demanding talent for adventure and love... His film lacks the detailed exposition of the many twists and turns of Michael Curtiz's 'Casablanca.' There is no club so well organized in his movie, no open arena of conspiracy, counterspies, secret plans, black market transactions, no true democrat with women, and no traditional woman enclosed by two rivals...
  • This drama/love story could have been excellent. Played out against the last months of the corrupt and US/UK-supported Batista regime, the collapse of the old society as Castro's fidelistas begin to take over is shown compellingly. The point is well made that a revolution will only succeed if the people are behind it which, in this instance, they clearly were.

    It's a shame that the movie couldn't have been filmed in Cuba, as of course all the famous landmarks of Havana are missing, but its real problems are threefold.

    Firstly the storyline is confusing, complicated and unconvincing, with none of the characters being allowed to hold one's attention.

    Secondly, the acting is poor. Even Sean Connery - who is normally excellent - seems to have had his mind on other things the whole time.

    And thirdly, for some inexplicable reason, the chanting of 'Fidel' as Castro enters Havana in triumph morphs into a Nazi crowd chanting 'Sieg Heil'. Whatever was this trying to say? When Castro actually came into power, one of the first things he did was to open all the 'whites-only' clubs to black people, and to make it clear in an early speech that there was no such thing as a superior race. To liken Castro to Hitler is a travesty of the facts.

    So, ultimately a flawed film. Watch it not for the story or the 'message' but for what is going on in the background.
  • There have been many stories of people going to countries on the eve of a revolution and finding out why there's a revolution. "Cuba" is kept afloat by strong performances. Sean Connery plays Maj. Robert Dapes, sent to Havana to help Batista fight the revolutionary army, but he soon figures out that the revolution is clearly going to succeed. In the process, he meets Alexandra (Brooke Adams), an old flame now married to a philandering cigar factory owner.

    I guess that overall, there's nothing here that we haven't seen before. But the way that they filmed it gives one the feeling of a society about to explode. Also starring Jack Weston, Hector Elizondo, Denholm Elliott, Martin Balsam, Chris Sarandon, Lonette McKee, and Alejandro Rey (aka Carlos Ramirez on "The Flying Nun"). Worth seeing.

    One more thing that I have to ask is whether or not Sydney Pollack remade this as "Havana". The two movies don't have the exact same plots, but they're certainly pretty close.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Plot: A British mercenary is hired by the Cuban government to defeat Fidel Castro's insurgency but finds an old love instead.

    If there is such a thing as failing with verve, thenthis film does it. It has an interesting concept - counterinsurgency expert fresh from Malaya tries to help Batista's regime - which is swiftly abandoned in favour of a rekindled romance with an old flame. Finally the revolution occurs and the movie descends into a few mediocre action sequences. Pre-revolutionary Cuba is splendidly re-created in all its glamour and glitz; seething with vice, poverty and intrigue. Sadly the script isn't all that convincing and seems to take ages to get anywhere. A handful of stand out scenes and the brilliantly conjured atmosphere can't conceal the lack of forward momentum, although this is partly imposed by the tragic nature of events (Connery's character can't stop the rebellion and doesn't get the girl).

    Worth one viewing.
  • This film is laughably bad. In the scene in the restaurant Sean Connery and Brooke Adams are clearly at a loss for words. This scene is obviously unscripted and they are making up the dialog and not doing very well either! The entire picture falls apart in the last fifteen minutes with silly and uncoordinated action being filmed just to fill up the running time. I am sure that the actors (and this picture has a good cast) would like to forget that this flick was in their filmography. The dialog is silly, the action is senseless, the relationships unbelievable. The director has a lot to answer for. A waste of good film.
  • (Some Spoilers) The days are not only numbered for the year 1958 but also for the Batista regime running Cuba as well. With the Cuban rebels lead by the "Bearded One", Fidel Castro, streaming out of the Mestra Serria Mountains and linking up with thousands of supporters in the big cities like Havana and Santiago. Batista and his gang are making every attempt to get out of the island with all the loot that can carry before the rebels take over the Havana airport, Batista & Co.only escape route, and put them in front of a firing squad.

    In the middle of all this chaos British mercenary Maj.Robert Dapes, Sean Connery, is hired by the Batista government to help steam the rebel tide. Arriving in Havana Robert finds that there's more then a revolution going on in Cuba. There's the stunning and beautiful Alexandra Lopez de Pulido, Brooks Adams,there for whom he's carried a torch for over fifteen years, since he was a British soldier in North Africa back in WWII.

    Robert realizes right away that the situation is hopeless for the government forces and plans to get out of the country as soon as he can. Yet he's torn with fleeing Cuba an at the same time leaving his former, and now rediscovered, lover Alexandra behind. Alexandra is married to wealthy and politically connected Cuban Juan Pulido, Chris Sarandon,who besides being a good for nothing spoiled rich boy is also cheating on her. Juan is having an affair with the sexy Therese Mederos, Lon Etta McKee, who works in his cigar factory as a tobacco roller.

    With everything falling apart in the confusion There's younger brother Julio, Danny De La Paz, who's a Castro supporter. Julio is out to kill Juan for his disrespecting his sister by having her treated like she's a hooker. Robert tries to get Alexandra to come with him out of the war-torn island nation but she decides to stay in her beloved Cuba and face whatever the coming Castro regime has to offer her. With Robert leaving on the last plane out of the now rebel-controlled Havana Airport we see Alexandra, on the ground, in tears watching him leave Cuba as well as her heart forever. As for Alexandra's cheating husband Juan he get's just what's coming to him at the conclusion of the movie.

    The film "Cuba" shows the audience just how things were on that island nation back in late 1958 and up to New Years Day 1959 when the Castro rebels took over the country. The last days of the Batista Regime were so weird and surrealistic that most of the people there couldn't fathom just what was happening and acted as if everything was just normal; as their world was slowly collapsing all around them.
  • Very disappointing movie in spite of the good cast. No wonder Connery never mentions this film in discussions of his work. Weak plot, poorly written, makes little sense--it COULD have been a very good movie. Save your money--HAVANA with R. Redford has a better feel for the period and the fall of pre-Castro Cuba.
  • moggie99200227 November 2006
    There are a number of links between this film and the James Bond movies.

    As well as the obvious presence of Sean Connery, we have Walter Gotell who played Morzeny in "From Russia with Love" and then played General Anatol Gogol in 5 Bond films as well as the "James Bond Jr" TV series.

    In addition, the Spanish city of Cadiz in Andalucia was used for much of the location shooting - a location which also doubled as Cuba in "Die Another Day".

    Aside from that, the film creates a wonderfully atmospheric impression of a regime on its last legs, attempting the resist the seemingly inevitable regime change sought by the rebels.

    Not a great film but perfectly watchable (even if I did find myself looking out for familiar Andalucian scenery as much as following the plot!).
  • As a connoisseur of very bad cinema, I haven't laughed so hard in a long time. For all involved, this star-studded catastrophe must either have been a desperate misery, or a sad, resigned joke to make.

    Somehow permitted to be shot on location in legitimately atmospheric locations in Havana, this turkey seems to have been enacted within an alternate universe, where each and every person is, for lack of a more eloquent designation, flat-out stupid.

    Nearly every shot and line of dialog contains truly jaw-dropping anachronisms, incongruities, and incomprehensible plot gaps.

    The characters, each the epitome of stereotyping (as well as typecasting) are quite completely air-headed. With the lonely exception of Sean Connery, whose apparently sincere effort sadly amounted to no particular improvement to the results, all the actors as well as the writers and director phoned in their work, apparently via low-fidelity satellite phones.

    Someday I hope to read someone's memoirs about the making of _Cuba_. Meanwhile I'd actually recommend it to anyone with an appreciation for Bad Cinema. It richly earns my vote for inclusion in the list of 50 worst films of all time; the two stars in my 2/10 rating are due to the true amusement value of pretentious cinematic drek of the very first caliber.
  • Richard Lester had the same "bad luck" than -let's say- Orson Welles. Lester's first movies on The Beatles were masterpieces, without any doubt. These were bad news for Lester's later pictures because everybody was expecting wonderful things like "Hard Day's Night" or "Help". And, simply, Lester was unable to deliver. OK, with a few exceptions. "Cuba" was one of them (and maybe "Petulia" was the other). "Cuba" is a great movie. Having as a backdrop the last few days of Batista's dictatorship in Cuba (with notable dramatic appeal and amazing historical accuracy), Lester carefully develops a very sad and beautiful love story. Sean Connery and Brooke Adams as the lovers who meet again after fifteen years are really superb. Chris Sarandon is so perfect a villain that you would like to kill him with your own hands. But the most important issue is Lester's ability to create an atmosphere of disenchantment, of sadness looking at all these people who cannot, who will not ever understand how to love each other and live in peace.
  • Although the film is not terrific, what can be said for it is that a lot of effort was put into the creating of the film that was full of diverse action and story; from the film's beginning to the film's end not everything is so clear, and where the film is going is also uncertain.

    By following the individual characters around Cuba, and by observing the personal backgrounds & lives of these characters, one gets a decent idea of what Cuba was like at this period of time (from the corruption to the guerrilla war) that is at the same time entertaining. Although at points some of the subplots interfere with the overall film, a decent job was done in this well-acted, well-shot film that combines a lot of themes and a lot of ideas with a diverse story. Overall, worth watching.
  • slightlymad2219 May 2017
    Cuba (1979)

    Plot In A Paragraph: Robert Dapes (Connery) a British mercenary (with surprisingly high principles given his job) arrives in pre-Revolution Cuba to help train the corrupt General Batista's army against Castro's guerrillas while he also romances Alexandra Pulido (Brooke Adams), a former lover now married to a plantation owner.

    In his last movie of the 1970's Sean Connery reunited with director Richard Lester who once again produces an uneven movie. It's almost as if he changed his mind mid filming about what type of movie he was trying to make. Connery (who looks great in his tan suit and fedora) who has saved worse movies than this, dominates every scene he is in, but seriously has his work cut out here. It's all just so bland and uninteresting, and it's dialogue would be rejected by the bosses of day time soap opera writers.

    It's worth noting Connery's future Indiana Jones co-str Denholm Elliot Jack Weston and Hector Elizondo all pop up in supporting roles. Other than that, there is nothing worth seeing in the cliché ridden snooze fest.

    A few years ago, I paid a silly price for the DVD on import, as I had never seen it( and it was missing from my collection. I wish I'd saved my money, as you can buy it considerably cheaper these days.

    Connery ended the 70's with a whimper rather than a bang, as Cuba bombed at the box office. Things would not really improve for him for quite a while, as for director Lester however, he went on to take over from Richard Donner and completed the filming on Superman 2.
  • There's something about Cuba, just ninety minutes south of Key West in Florida, and its revolution at the end of the 1950s that has fascinated filmmakers and artists. Perhaps because it marked the end of an era for American interests in the country or how it set the stage for some of the major Cold War confrontations of the decade that followed, including the failed invasion at the Bay of Pigs and the dramatic events of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Whatever the case, director Richard Lester would be one of those who brought their lens to bear exploring it with this 1979 film.

    The film's focus, as much as it had one, would be on a former British army major turned mercenary, hired by the toppling Batista government to help deal with their guerilla insurgency. Who better to play Major Dapes than Sean Connery? Connery brings a sense of both presence and world-weariness to the part, a man who comes to do a job only to be surrounded by fools and a chance to rekindle an old flame. Wandering between exasperation, earnestness, and hope for love, it's arguably one of Connery's most underrated performances and one that deserves more attention.

    Backing Connery was a large supporting cast, perhaps too large. Brooke Adams plays the old flame Alexandra that seemingly conflicted object of desire whose motives are as elusive to viewers as she is to Major Dapes. More understandable as a character, if far less sympathetic, is Chris Sarandon as her playboy and womanizing husband, blowing money and sleeping his way around. From there, the cast features character actors is ranging from Jack Weston's slimy American businessman to Martin Balsam as the corrupt blowhard of a Cuban general who hires Connery and Denholm Elliott as a fellow British ex-pat flying for anyone with money. There are some notable then up-and-comers in the cast from Hector Elizondo's as Connery's Cuban military escort to Roger Lloyd-Pack as a Cuban revolutionary. While the film is guilty of too much casting of white actors as Cubans, it's full of good actors in parts that too often aren't enough for them to use to the utmost of their talents and seem to wander in and out of the plot without reason.

    Mentioning the way characters wander in and out of the film brings us to something that is both a strength and weakness of it. Under both Lester's direction and at the pen of screenwriter Charles Wood, this is a kaleidoscope of a film. One that takes us from the streets, hotels, and clubs of Havanna into the factories and plantations of the countryside. From the strip shows of Louisa Moritz's Miss Wonderly to a group of guerillas and the ex-pats taking advantage of it all, the various strata of Cuban society teetering on edge ready to fall are on display. Thanks to a mix of location filming in Spain, sets, and costumes, it's also vividly presented. Full of both borderline poverty and decay mixed with decadent excess and splendor, and ripe for a change that was perhaps inevitable.

    The problem is that it also means the film never comes together. In an ideal world, or maybe with some slight editing, Cuba would flow together as a series of interconnected events, the tale of disparate people who wander in and out of each other's lives. Instead, and where the blame lies isn't clear, the film feels like the scripts for several different ones tossed together. Or like an anthology of short stories linked together without enough connective tissue. Combined with dialogue that can border the cliche at times and downright wooden in others, it knocks the whole work down a few rungs.

    Cuba then remains an intriguing but flawed piece of work. So many of its elements, from Connery's performance to its location and kaleidoscope view, work so well. Yet it's scope is in some ways too wide, with no one and nothing well-defined enough to come entirely into focus. Nevertheless, as a portrait of a time and place, Lester's Cuba works far better than it does as a drama and remains watchable even with its flaws.
  • Although a trivial matter in regards to the plot, the film opens and a date (1959) appears on the screen. Given that Castro entered Havana on New Year's Day, 1959 and Battista had already fled Cuba on December 31, 1958, the events that transpire in the movie could hardly have occurred in 1959.
  • From the corruption and violence of Batista to the corruption and violence of Castro. A not very credible plot in a very interesting setting.
  • "Cuba" is a film which in some ways bears a similarity to "Casablanca". But it's different enough that it's clearly not a remake...and probably not even a reworking of the film. Instead, it's different enough to make it somewhat original...though I found several of the characters confusing and poorly realized.

    The story is set in the days before the successful revolution of Castro in Cuba. The supporters of Batista and the current government seem clueless that their country is about to fall...as are several foreigners who are there on business. The main foreigner in the story is Robert Dapes (Sean Connery), a mercenary hired by the government to help them defeat the revolutionaries. Unfortunately, it's a case of too little too late and soon Dapes realizes that the country is about to revert into chaos. Also unfortunate is that Dapes meets up with a woman he once loved...and she seems more than willing to throw her life away for no particular reason.

    The idea of making a film about the Cuban revolution is interesting. I liked this part of the film, though I do think the story made EVERYONE in the federal government look like total buffoons...and I cannot imagine all of them being this stupid. However, the romance is a mess and ruins the film. Connery is okay as Dapes, but his lady love (played by Brooke Adams) just doesn't make sense at all. Her motivations are confusing, she seems incredibly angry one minute and frisky and ready for action with Dapes the next. To me, her character just seemed incomplete. As for her husband, he was NOT anything like the husband in "Casablanca". Instead of a noble leader of men, this husband is essentially trash...and you have no idea whatsoever what Adams' character sees in him. None. A couple poorly written characters who are main characters is deadly for a film...and thus my score of 5. Sadly, with a tiny bit of re-writing this could have been a terrific film. Connery is fine in it and much of the story is interesting. But badly written characters sink this to a level of mediocrity that is just a shame.

    By the way, why is it that many of the main Cuban characters were played by non-Hispanic actors? This is bizarre. Also, if you think about it, the relationship between Dapes and his lady love during WWII was REALLY creepy and inappropriate, though folks back in 1979 did have different sensibilities.
  • You don't come to this for action or romance; the former is fleeting and the latter isn't believable. The wit evident throughout, the cinematography, and the talent of the cast almost-just almost-make it work.
  • I was looking forward to this film as I was very interested to see if US propaganda against Cuba would overshadow the film or whether some historical accuracy would be portrayed. Unfortunately this film shows like a quickly thrown together filler that trades on Sean Connery's big name. There are plenty of good cast members like Martin Balsam, Jack Weston, Alejandro Rey, Hector Elizando and of course Connery, but none of them capture the essence of their roles. Connery in particular hardly seems like a military man let alone a top notch mercenary as he wander through the film as if he were waiting for the script.

    I was hoping for more, but it never delivered
  • seveb-2517917 September 2020
    The movie is an understated satire or black comedy, set in crumbling Cuba on the eve of revolution. The actors play it straight and let the absurdness of the situations speak for themselves, which I think is a good thing, as I've always felt that, when depicting strange events based on real life, playing them for laughs only serves to detract from their impact. (For example, I did not enjoy "The Wolf of Wall Street" for that very reason). "Truth is stranger than fiction" as Mark Twain famously said, and you only have to watch the news in 2020 to see the proof of that. The plot is adequate but unexceptional, merely used as a framework upon which to display a series of everyday events in the life of a country turning inside out, rather than being a significant end in itself. Using the device of co-incidence, what initially appear to be unrelated story threads are interwoven into a satisfactory whole. Overall I enjoyed the movie as an amusing slice of colourful historical life, where beautiful but decaying colonial buildings contrast with stark, brutal modernist architecture and the half constructed skeleton of a hotel, which has been occupied and adapted by the abject poor. Huge American luxury cars with outrageous tail fins against jeeps and tanks. Revolutionaries who all seem to sport Fidel Castro beards against decadent aristocrats. Most of them thought it would be would be just another brief interlude of upheaval in the BAU of old school post-colonial corruption, but it turned out the new school had more staying power than they imagined, although I guess the corruption and poverty have remained much the same.
  • Set during the days leading up to Castro's revolution in 1959, "Cuba" is a wide-ranging character study that also happens to be a convincing portrayal of the unrest -- political, social and otherwise -- surrounding that event. It also has a great cast attached to it, including Sean Connery, Brooke Adams, Chris Sarandon, Martin Balsam, Denholm Elliott and Jack Weston (who is particularly good as the opportunistic American businessman). And look for David Rappaport -- future Time Bandit -- in a small role (sorry, bad joke) as the cigar factory overseer.

    This was director Richard Lester's fifth and final film with writer Charles Wood, a collaboration which produced such 1960s classics as "The Knack," "Help!," "How I Won the War" and "The Bed Sitting Room." "Cuba," which came ten years later, can most definitely be added to that list.
  • This picture has a serious problem to start, inappropriate contract of a mercenary in such situation when Castro already had Cuba in your hands, the triangle love story is totally unbeliavable to fit in, they tried to improve the picture adding a female sexy character to Connery has some reason to stay there, the battle on cane field depose against the picture laying down at mass grave of the useless, it was so ridiculous scene, also great stars featured are quite often lost on it, for some good acting like the fine Jack Weston and Chris Sarandon 6 out 10!!!

    Resume:

    First watch: 1982 / How many: 3 / Source: TV-DVD / Rating: 6
  • Enjoyed this movie immensely--much more than I expected, seeing the (undeservedly) low score on IMDB. Actually, ever since Sean Connery passed away a few months ago at the age of 90, I wanted to watch as many of his movies as possible-so been on a Connery binge this summer. CUBA is one of the gems I discovered as a result--I used to live in Miami and know somewhat more about the Cuba-Miami link than the average viewer, but the movie never gets tedious and you don't need any background knowledge to appreciate it.

    CUBA is about how a bunch of non-Cubans--Americans and Europeans, Sean Connery's British mercenary Bob among them--assemble in Havana and interact with the locals in the midst of the political tussle between Batista and Fidel C in the late 50s. In the mix are Cubans of various social classes: a cigar factory owner-couple, Alexandra (Brooke Adams) and her sleazy husband who routinely sleeps with factory employees; a prostitute recruited to entertain an American businessman (Larry); and a student revolutionary out to get Connery's Bob character.

    Each of these characters has distinct motivations that feel true to life and to the dysfunctional but weirdly logical society that is Cuba. Cuba is a land of paradoxes but above all Cubans are incredibly proud of their country--Alexandra and Bob were lovers when she was a teen, and now fifteen years later she tells him after they sleep together that she could never leave Cuba. Bob finds this unbelievable--how could someone love the modern, worldly life and yet be loyal with all their heart to a country falling apart at the seams? For Alexandra though, Cuba is home--she's my favorite character in the movie--and her in-betweenness, modern yet traditional fits with the many Cuban-Americans I've known in Miami.

    All other characters play their parts well too, and are amusing, entertaining, engaging--including the biggest character in the movie: the landscape suggestive of Cuba. Notably, this was filmed in Spain: but the atmosphere created therein was incredibly convincing, at least to non-Cubans such as myself. If I were Cuban I might well find this substitution of Spain for Cuba almost unacceptable: but there was no other recourse as Cuba at the time of this film was closed to the outside world.

    Another potential deal-breaker for locals: the way Cuba and Cubans are portrayed in the film, which is not very flattering. I'm sorry but it still rings true to me--the movie shows how people and things actually are as opposed how we'd like them to be. For example, corrupt Cuban cops and Americans fat and flush with cash only seem real to me. Add to that little glimpses of local life such as a blender spewing juice all over might seem over-the-top--unless you've lived or spent significant time in the third-world like I have--then you'll know this movie paints an honest portrait of place.
  • Perhaps the reason I like this film so much is because I don't, normally, like the cinema of Richard Lester. I've always found it too frenetic to be funny and too fragmented to be involving on any human level. However, CUBA is, arguably, the most misunderstood picture to close out the decade of the 70s. It is a brilliant visual satire of a society in total materialistic collapse with every character in the picture (save the white knight James Bond figure played by Sean Connery who is rendered completely ineffectual by the chaos that is tumbling down upon him)is literally on the take. What is extraordinary here is that the mise-en-scene is as visually dazzling and stylistically coherent CAPTURING chaos as it is satirically barbed, subtle and consistently ingenious. You really have to WATCH this movie. There's always something inventive and extremely droll going on around the edges. The supporting cast of Jack Weston, Hector Elizondo, Walter Godell, Martin Balsam, Chris Sarandon, Denholm Elliott and Alexandro Rey (unrecognizable)was flawlessly assembled but because the film doesn't ANNOUNCE its satirical intentions and Lester refuses to telegraph his gags and put anything in the center of the frame, most people came away from the picture pooh-faced. Well, there is one other problem with CUBA and Lester has to take the brunt of the responsibility for it which is, in his corrosively ebullient fervor (and perhaps because, as a director he never responded to women very much), he left poor, ultra-lovely Brooke Adams out to dry as a character. It's clear that he has nothing but contempt for the "Casablanca" aspect of the story involving her and Connery but he should have done a better job disguising the fact. I think Connery is terrific in his role making the pathos of his Gable-like flawed hero comical and deeply affecting. Lester was even more successful in JUGGERNAUT satirizing a genre while squeezing the maximum thrills out of it at the same time. CUBA doesn't work successfully on both levels in the way that JUGGERNAUT does. But it is the most impressively detailed and dynamically precise cinematic rendering of what the last days of a politically corrupt regime looks like - as it goes into free-fall - that a mainstream commercial film maker has ever given us.
An error has occured. Please try again.