User Reviews (271)

Add a Review

  • THE BURNING

    Aspect ratio: 1.85:1

    Sound format: Mono

    An abusive caretaker at a lonely summer camp is disfigured by fire during a prank which goes horribly wrong. Five years later, he returns to the area to take revenge against one of his former persecutors (now a camp counsellor) and the kids in his charge.

    Makeup artist Tom Savini rejected an opportunity to work on "Friday the 13th Part 2" (1981) in order to create effects for Tony Maylam's THE BURNING, yet another in the assembly line of low-budget horror movies which emerged in the wake of HALLOWEEN (1978). Savini warned the film's producers - including a fledgling Harvey Weinstein! - that the script for THE BURNING shared uncomfortable similarities with the "Friday" sequel, though fans may have been too dazzled by the gruesome set-pieces to either notice or care. In truth, THE BURNING shares only a handful of superficial details with "Friday 2", including a late night campfire episode in which the villain is dismissed as an urban legend, culminating in a false 'scare' which today's audiences will probably see coming a mile off. Despite a couple of groan-inducing incidentals ("Oh, I forgot my vitamins - I'll have to go back to my cabin through the dark, creepy woods!"), the narrative develops organically from one scene to the next, and characters react believably to the escalating situation. Unfortunately, the climax - set mostly within an abandoned mineshaft - is staged and executed with little flair or suspense, and amounts to something of a major disappointment.

    Of course, the main point of interest - besides seeing some familiar faces in early roles, including Jason Alexander (TV's "Seinfeld"), Fisher Stevens (SHORT CIRCUIT) and an unrecognisable Holly Hunter - is Savini's horrific makeup effects: Victims are slashed, stabbed, punctured and poked in graphic detail, and blood flows copiously from some horribly convincing wounds. Indeed, the film reaches a crescendo of horror during a notorious sequence involving an 'abandoned' canoe (I'll say no more), one of the most vicious set-pieces of the 1980's 'slasher' cycle. Briskly paced, and scored with a series of electronic doodles by no less than Rick Wakeman (!), THE BURNING may seem awfully simplistic to modern viewers, but it delivers the gory goods in no uncertain terms. The movie was censored for an R-rating, but the uncut version has since been released on home video.
  • ODDBear2 November 2007
    The Burning has the great fortune of being a product of the early 80's slasher fest that greeted audiences in the hundreds. Some genre highlights were produced from ca. 1980-1984, a time when these films took themselves semi-seriously and were moderately successful at creating creepy atmosphere, displaying gratuitous nudity and inventing some spectacular death sequences. The late seventies laid the groundwork for what was to become a stable formula for these movies and for a minimum budget and isolated surroundings the films could provide some solid shocks and gore that pleased audiences.

    The Burning is nearly identical in plot and storyline to Friday the 13th. Here the bad guy is a burn victim as a result of a prank gone awry and years later he takes vengeance on unsuspecting campers in gruesome fashion. While the movie is pretty slow and the gore fest doesn't really start until an hour in it's never boring. Here's where the film is different from Friday the 13th and many others: The teens aren't merely disposable pricks who you can't wait see get their grisly demise. They're actually a pretty likable bunch, well played by some future stars (Jason Alexander, particularly likable here, and Fisher Stevens among them) and when some get slashed you kinda feel bad for them.

    Now for what really counts. Two things; gore and mood. The Tom Savini gore effects do not disappoint. Keep in mind that this is 1981 and digital effects have improved horror gore somewhat but this is pretty impressive stuff. The raft scene is a particular standout. As for mood, you can't beat these early 80's alone-in-the-woods scenarios and they're all well played out here. Although there are a lot of false scares here, they're buildups are great and the creepy surroundings go a long way. If films like Psycho made people afraid to take a shower and Jaws made people afraid of the water then films like The Burning and Friday the 13th must have made a few parents hesitant at sending their kids to summer camps.

    Fans of slasher films will not want to miss The Burning. Although Friday the 13th is more suspenseful and The Burning feels a bit too stretched, it nevertheless has plenty of good moments and top notch kill scenes. What's not to like?
  • Summer camp caretaker Cropsy is fire roasted when some pranksters try to scare him with a flaming skull. Five years later, after numerous failed skin grafts, Cropsy is released back into society with a horribly scarred face and even more scarred psychological make-up. Now he's got a bone to pick and returns to the same camp of his accident (after gutting a hooker in the stomach with a pair of scissors) to get revenge on the new campers populating the camp. Armed with a pair of hedge clippers he doesn't hesitate to hack into a dozen or so foul-mouthed, oversexed teens, setting aside special interest in counselor Todd (Brian Matthews), who was one of the kids responsible for his burning. Even though it's saddled with a tired, predictable plot, this is still one of the best of the Friday the 13th rip-offs, and that has a a lot to do with Tom Savini's gory special effects. The music score is also excellent and there are fun appearances by Jason Alexander, Holly Hunter, the guy who played Ratner in Fast Times at Ridgemont High and some other recognizable faces before they were famous. The original VHS of this film was heavily trimmed to remove the gore, but that footage has since been restored. I saw the uncut version on Showtime actually.
  • I first saw this in the late 80s. Revisited it recently on a DVD. Weinstein brothers made their debut with this poor man's Friday the 13th done right. The special effects were done by Tom Savini n he nailed it. The raft scene is the best highlight. Lots of stabbings via the gardening shears, slashings, severed fingers, etc. It's definitely worth a view for fans of slasher movies. There is sufficient violence n nudity but the sex scene is one of the lamest. The plot- a group of kids decides to play a prank on the caretaker of a camp. The joke goes bad n the victim sets himself on fire. He is released after five years from the hospital but his face has been deformed n he seeks vengeance. The cast included future well-known actors. The movie is full of slasher clichés, wandering away from everyone for a nude pond dip, having sex in the woods, going down to the basement alone, not defending oneself but rather running helter-skelter, not making an effort to make sure that the killer is dead once its down. The movie has one very different aspect, there was no waiting until the end for the big reveal of the killer's identity, its fully revealed from the onset. The cinematography is decent with the lush greens of the camps surrounding forest n the images of flowing water.
  • There's no disguising the fact that 'The Burning' is a rip off of 'Friday the 13th' so I won't bother arguing about it. The most important thing is that 'The Burning' has more likeable characters and they are killed off in gorier and more flamboyant ways. This makes it one of the few knock offs that I can think of that surpasses the original. The thing that really makes this outstanding isn't the handful of actors in the cast of unknowns that went on to bigger and better things (Jason Alexander, Holly Hunter,etc.), but Tom Savini's realistic and gruesome effects, some of his best work. I don't think you really watch a slasher movie for much more than some shocks and some gore, and this has both in spades, making it one of the very best slasher movies of the 80s. This genre isn't my favourite kind of horror, but I enjoyed 'The Burning' a great deal, and the uncut version is worth tracking down for the raft sequence alone, which is unforgettable and very, very cool. Recommended, but not for the squeamish.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Though the main draw of this virtual Friday The 13th clone is unquestionably the FX work of Tom Savini, The Burning is an enjoyable slasher flick in its own right, and it's likely that even without the maestro on hand, this would still be a serviceable outing. With a couple of surprisingly effective jump-scares, a fantastic score by Rick Wakeman, and early appearances by some solid character actors like Larry Joshua and Ned Eisenberg, there are some quality elements here that drastically elevate the rote material.

    Elsewhere, most of the film follows the splatter movie guidebook to the letter, right down to the campfire retelling of the killer's origin and the false scare that follows. Strangely, an eerily identical scene appears in Friday The 13th Part 2, which even utilizes identical camera angles, but since the films were produced at roughly the same time and released a week apart, it's impossible to figure out who copied who.

    The characters are all time-tested archetypes (the prankster, the bully, the sexpot, etc.), and in keeping with the standard tropes of the genre, most of the actors are clearly far older than the teens they play. Seinfeld's George Alexander is the most obviously out of place, and he appears to be well into his 30's here. However, his sophomoric antics (and full head of hair) offer genuine curiosity value, and if you've ever secretly wanted to see George Costanza's bare buttocks, this is the movie for you.

    The Burning does run a bit slow, and the particularly nasty murder of a prostitute early in the movie seems tacked on to tide gore fans over for the 40 minutes of summer camp antics that follow, since it makes absolutely no sense in the scope of the plot. While the first killing does augment the rather svelte body count, the tone of the sequence plays out like an outtake from Maniac, and this tidbit of gratuitous butchery is decidedly disjointed from the rest of the film.

    After this befuddling introduction, the film spends far too much time developing the dynamics of the one-dimensional campers. However, when the "fun with pruning shears" portion of the program eventually kicks in, The Burning starts unfolding like a top-notch slasher film, and the ensuing splatter is offered up with reckless abandon. An extended throat-slitting lingers on screen far longer than any fan familiar with the wimpy stance of the MPAA will be expecting, and when you see how explicitly the death of the film's stereotypical machismo-laden lunkhead is presented, you'll reach the very pleasant realization that despite the "R" on the back of the case, the DVD release of The Burning is actually the original Unrated cut. A nifty mass slaughter on a make-shift raft plays like a Tom Savini highlight reel, and those who appreciate the artistry inherent in the days of classic gore effects will probably end up rewinding that sequence a few times.

    Though the killer's back-story isn't particularly novel, Savini brings Cropsy to vivid life with the help of some great prosthetics, and had this film been as successful as the Crystal Lake follies it blatantly emulates, this would have been an interesting character to follow through a franchise.

    The climax, where Cropsy is revealed in all his charred glory, brings the affair to a sturdy finish, though attentive viewers will spot a couple of glaring gaffes. The final scene suggests a sequel without demanding one, which ends the film on a haunting note that ties things up in a tidy and satisfying package.

    The Burning isn't quite a classic, but any fan of the genre has squandered 90 minutes in far worse ways than this. The best portions of this modest thriller are right on par with the most classic moments in the genre, and since The Burning delivers all of the most crucial elements of a great slasher movie, it ultimately ends up being a rousing success. For what it's worth, this is a personal favorite.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Surprising better than I thought! 80's by the numbers story with sex, mixed with over the top characters. Nude people , and crude humor all in the mix with violence for a typical slasher film. The Burning breaks a few rules with few surprises, and there is a few gross scenes; but what works for The Burning is the story build up. What makes the grade b revenge horror movie better then others b slasher flicks is that the viewer sees the killers pathos, and the day to day working of the summer camp, before the fateful canoe trip. There is lot's of story build up. As the story builds up we get to see a young George of Stienfield in it. As the viewer watches acting, and directing we notice The Burning is not so bad for another revenge horror movies. Worth watching. 7 stars.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Back in the days of VHS rental, The Burning was my holy grail. That's because its effects were featured in Tom Savini's book Grande Illusions, his how-to guide to creating the gore he'd so expertly brought to the screen. Like any good little gorehound, I had an autographed, dog-earned, karo-syrup sticky copy (I still have it, barely held together and hidden away in my library) that I paged through nearly every day, wishing I could see The Burning, a movie that had to be completely and utterly awesome.

    I built this movie up to the kind of hype that today's always-on social media Hollywood can only dream of, so it could only be a letdown. And I'm sorry to say that every few years, I try and go back to this movie in the hopes that this will be the viewing that makes me fall in love with the actual film. It's never really happened. I'm not alone in this - my wife has watched the 2018 Halloween in the double digits, hoping she'll find the same love for it that she has even for the fifth and sixth installments.

    Other than the Savini effects, which live up to every bit of their promise on the black and white pages of his aforementioned book, The Burning is probably most notable for its translation of the Cropsey mythos and for featuring early appearances of Fisher Stevens (Short Circuit and Eugene "The Plague" Belford from Hackers), Jason Alexander (Seinfeld) and Holly Hunter (who went on to become an accomplished Academy Award-winning actress in Coen Brothers movies like Blood Simple and Raising Arizona).

    The film comes from people who would go on to become Hollywood power players. The screenplay was written by Bob Weinstein (along with Peter Lawrence, who would write for the cartoons Silverhawks and Thundercats), working from a story by producer Harvey Weinstein (yes, the very same), Tony Maylam (who also directed) and Brad Grey (who would go on to be the chairman and CEO for Paramount).

    It all came about because Harvey was looking for some way, any way to break into movies. Along with his producing partner Michael Cohl, he knew that low budget horror was a great way to do that. Swapping old horror stories, Weinstein brought the legend of Cropsey that he had heard while camping as a teenager in upstate New York and they kicked off production in 1979 with a five-page treatment called The Cropsey Maniac that predated Friday the 13th. There must have been something in the water in 1980, as while both of these films were in their various stages of production, Joseph Ellison was finishing a film he wanted to call The Burning, yet retitled to be Don't Go in the House. Keep in mind that this was the very start of the slasher boom, before films began self-referencing one another to death. It's just that the archetype of young campers being menaced by a maniac was, believe it or not, an untapped well at one point in time.

    That also explains Madman, which was in casting when an actress told that film's producers that her boyfriend was acting in another movie with the same story called The Burning. As a result, that film was delayed until 1982, when the slasher wave had already started to see lesser returns.

    To fund the movie, the Weinsteins formed Miramax, named for their parents. They were able to get around $1.5 million, although the movie did go over budget. Ironically, while the film depicts a monster, perhaps Harvey ended up being the biggest one of them all.

    I say this because this film's production assistant Paula Wachowiak alleged that his predatory ways were already happening on this film. One night when Wachowiak needed Weinstein to sign checks for the accounting department, he answered the door wearing only a towel, which he dropped to reveal himself to her. When she refused his attentions, he allegedly continued to harass her throughout the film's production.

    The one thing you have to give the Miramax guys credit for is that they knew talent. Getting Savini meant an audience of Fangoria nerds - like me - would line up for this film. The special effects auteur had already turned down the second go-round for Jason Vorhees, unable to understand how the character would be able to survive for so long alone in the woods, and spent just three days creating the burn makeup for the villain of this film, basing his look on a homeless burn victim he'd seen walking the streets of his native Pittsburgh.

    The story starts at Camp Blackfoot, where campers once pranked the caretaker Cropsey by placing a worm-festooned skull in his bed. This starts a massive fire that engulfs the man, who emerges with third-degree burns over most of his body. According to director Tony Maylam, who also helmed the Rutger Hauer versus Aliens film Split Second, he played this antagonist for most of the film to ensure that his trademark garden shears reflected the light in the right way.

    Five years - and many failed skin grafts - later, Cropsey is released from the hospital. One wonders how insurance worked in the 1970's, because a half-decade of hospital care would cost an astronomical sum today. He hides his scars in a long coat and hat as he walks the streets, ending up in the apartment of a hooker that he dispatches with a pair of Fiskars®.

    Grabbing a shiny new set of garden shears, he heads over to Camp Stonewater where he soon makes short work of an entire crew of campers. There's Sally, Alfred (Brian Backer, Mark "Rat" Ratner from Fast Times at Ridgemont High), Michelle (Leah Ayers from Bloodsport and the second Marcia Brady for the 1990's The Bradys series, which took that happy family and placed them into a drama that went face to face with hot button issues with unintentionally hilarious results), Todd (Brian Matthews, who acted in plenty of soap operas before becoming a therapist and running for office in Texas), Tiger, Karen, Fish, Woodstock (Fisher Stevens) and Eddy (Ned Eisenberg, who is Roger Kressler on the Law & Order shows). I nearly forgot Barbara, Dave, Marnie and Sophie.

    Actually, take it from me, there are way too many campers here. Luckily, Cropsey is around to wipe them out with his garden shears, which he jams into throats and uses to cut off fingers. The real star of the show here are the Savini effects, as gleaming blades are pushed into teenage flesh, resulting in showers of blood and gore.

    Sure, it takes an axe to the face and a flamethrower to kill Cropsey, but his legend continues at the close, as a new group of campers tells his story. There were plans to make a sequel, but the film didn't do well in its original theater run. After all, it was up against not just Friday the 13th Part 2, but also Happy Birthday to Me, Final Exam, Graduation Day and a re-released The Texas Chainsaw Massacre.

    It was distributed by Filmways, which wanted to rename it to Tales Around the Campfire, which is a pretty decent title, but not as great as The Burning.

    There was also some great talent behind the scenes. The soundtrack comes from Yes keyboardist Rick Wakeman who in addition to being a Freemason and Knight Templar also composed the scores for Crimes of Passion and She. Plus, it was edited by Jack Sholder, who would go on to direct Alone in the Dark, A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge and The Hidden.
  • Made in 1981, this film clearly jumped on the teenage slasher bandwagon and is very similar to a Friday the 13th movie. As far as the genre goes, 'The Burning' is way above average. Sure, it has the obligatory teenagers on summer camp and a deranged stalker out for 'revenge' but there are some genuinely tension-building moments and quite a few decent scares. The effects are above average (though quite heavily cut in the British version) thanks to gore-king, Tom Savini and Rick Wakeman's electronic music score is far more effective than Harry Manfredini's psycho-like strings in Friday the 13th. The acting is nothing special, but then again, it never is in these films.

    If you're in the mood for a decent, scary stalk'n'slash movie, you could do far, FAR worse than this.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I wondered that nobody brought up the irony (actually rather the uncomfortable connection) that of all poeple, "harvey weinstein" wrote the script for a movie where actually a couple of guys don't know what "no" means.

    And the cherry on the cake is the portrayal of the "no means yes" trope. Yikes is that hard to watch in 2018. I can only imagine one of the many akward scenes fading to black "Written by harvey weinstein"

    Fantastic.

    But Like I said before, overall it's not a bad movie, the effects were great (savini duh!) and also the acting was at least ok.
  • yawael18 March 2018
    Warning: Spoilers
    Because i'm kind of 80s horror slasher films fan i couldn't wait till watching this one, and that's because it was praised by horror fans and critics. but i must say that i didn't know what was all the fuss about ! The Beginning of the film was kind of promising we see a prank played by group of teenagers which goes wrong and burns a guy then after five years he gets out of the hospital and starts to kill teenagers at the camp ( in a way of revenge).

    The first murder he committed was to a prostitute which i found kind of bizarre, why he did that to her! (he must kills the boys who were responsible of his accident) , even when he goes to kill boys and girls at the camp you just keep asking yourself the same question ( why he's killing them although they are not the same dudes who made the prank!)

    Another thing was that the director killed this character right away from the start by showing his face through the window (they should kept his face kind of a mystify till the end of the film) and the second crime he commits goes around half an hour from the first one which makes you bored.

    One of the biggest mistakes was the killing and the slaughtering scenes (they really were terrible) ,because you just couldn't see it clearly even the last fight with the two heroes was also unclear ( although now we know how the guy looks like, but they just kept the fight vague and blurry ) . As for the characters , honestly i only liked Todd character which was played by Brian Matthews, as for the rest of the cast they were okay and Jason Alexander presence was so enjoyable . The only one i couldn't stand was Brian Backer, i didn't know whether he was a victim,lunatic or a complicated guy. he just tries the whole time to make feels sorry for him in the wrong direction ( he just kept showing us a silly performance with terrible body langue : honestly when he was running away from the burned guy i couldn't tell whether he was scared or having something else !!!.
  • I believe I've found what must be the seminal summer camp slasher film of the 1980s. It captures every element of the decade's obsession with movies like "Friday the 13th" and "Meatballs" and puts them in one package. Shout! Factory has scored again with their Blu-ray release of "The Burning."

    The caretaker of a summer camp is burned alive and left deformed after a prank goes wrong. Years later, he's released from the hospital and returns to the area where the accident occurred. A new group of campers have arrived for the summer and he has horrific plans for them. Hedge clippers in hand, the caretaker begins his reign of terror on the counselors and attendees.

    "The Burning" has the raunchy toilet humor of "Meatballs" mixed with everything you came to expect from slasher films like "Friday the 13th" and "Sleepaway Camp." You have nice girls making bad decisions by hooking up with bad guys. Unfortunately, the killer sees all and punishes them for their perverse deeds.

    I always thought the killer in "Friday the 13th, Part V: A New Beginning" was the first to utilize hedge clippers. I was very wrong, as you can see in "The Burning." It's obvious the psycho in "A New Beginning" took inspiration from the crazy caretaker.

    It's unbelievable how many big names are attached to "The Burning." Harvey Weinstein created and co-wrote the story. Bob Weinstein co-wrote the screenplay. Special Make-up Artist Tom Savini returns to camp for a second time after his classic work on "Friday the 13th." His handiwork keeps the blood flowing efficiently.

    Brian Backer plays a character more annoying than the one he did in "Fast Times at Ridgemont High." Jason Alexander (yes, George Costanza) portrays a sporty and popular high schooler. He has a full head of hair and doesn't wear glasses. Holly Hunter can be seen briefly as a camper. She looks like she was maybe 13 years old.

    "The Burning" is another one of those cult classics many people forget about in the shadow of "Friday the 13th." If you're a fan of 1980s slasher movies, it's a must-own.
  • This came out a week after "Friday the 13th Part 2" in 1981 and contains all the staples of that blossoming franchise: disfigured killer, iconic weapon (in this case, garden shears), summer camp, camp counselors, a prank gone wrong, swimming antics, deep woods sexual frolics, death during (or after) sex, a secret hideout for the killer, semi-nekkid or fully nekkid teen girls, etc.

    "The Burning" is held in high esteem mostly for its infamous raft sequence, but that only involves about 30 seconds and it's not THAT phenomenal. At best, the movie might be as good as some of the "Friday" sequels, although the girls are subpar by comparison, albeit okay. Nonetheless, "Burning" has its points of interest, like Brian Backer from "Fast Times at Ridgemont High" and, especially, a young Jason Alexander from Seinfeld with a full-head of hair. Production-wise, it's low-budget but superior to, say, "Sleepaway Camp."

    The film was shot in and around existing summer camps outside Buffalo in Western New York, as well as North Tonawanda.

    GRADE: B-/C+
  • I saw THE BURNING when it was released on the big screen and I have to say that decades later, I couldn't remember much of it except for the raft scene. So, I watched it again, just to see how it compares to other slashers and I have to say that it's pretty forgettable except for that infamous raft scene, which is rather violent and bloody but doesn't make much sense (how does the huge Cropsy stand up in a canoe without tipping it over?). The rest of the movie is played out like one of them MEATBALLS movies, where kids do kooky things (that usually involve sex) at a campground. That part, which is the bulk of the movie, is dull and totally useless. During this very long part of THE BURNING, the only thing which reminds us that we're watching a horror movie are Cropsy's weird Point-Of-View shots, which reminded me a lot to the famous POV shots in the Italian sci-fi flick, EYES BEHIND THE STARS. So even the POV scenes are derivative.

    In fact, the whole movie is extremely derivative. It's made of a huge part Friday THE 13TH, a good part MEATBALLS, small parts of EYES BEHIND THE STARS, etc. Aside from the fact that the ones battling Cropsy at the end are men and not the usual "last surviving female", there's nothing very original in THE BURNING. The story is really too simple as well. After a lot of time spent showing the campground's high jinks, the story suddenly follows a group that go on a canoe expedition and after they lose their canoes, the stranded teens and young adults are killed one by one. That's it. The whole thing is not helped by the fact that the forest looks like a forest one finds at the outskirts of a city. There's nothing remotely "remote" about the woodsy locales. And the ending, which occurs at some sort of abandoned building, made me completely forget that this is supposed to be a woodsy slasher.

    So, in closing, aside from the raft scene, THE BURNING is merely passable. Nothing less, nothing more. And it's not the "great slasher" a lot of people have made it out to be.
  • When some young campers at Camp Blackfoot play a mean-spirited trick on the camp's caretaker, it goes horribly wrong. Said caretaker, named Cropsy (Lou David) is burned beyond recognition. Sadly for him, he survives, only to leave the hospital after a lengthy stay. Unable to be helped, Cropsy becomes a vengeful killing machine. Now, camp is back in session for another summer. The kids are back, and so is Cropsy.

    THE BURNING is a surprisingly effective tale of revenge and bloodletting, and the killer is actually pretty frightening. Dark and silent, Cropsy is like a deadly shadow, living only to destroy those who have destroyed him. His attacks are savage and ruthless.

    Tom Savini's makeup and gore effects are very realistic. We can "feel" the wounds that Cropsy inflicts! The raft scene is legendary!

    Also, some of the characters aren't as annoying in this movie, as they can be in similar films. Personally, I cared whether they lived or died, which is unusual. Jason Alexander plays one of them, and watch for Holly Hunter in her first, fleeting role...,
  • Years after burning and disfiguring a camp groundskeeper, someone is terrorizing a summer camp of teenagers who look like they're in their mid-to-late twenties. Is it the same man? Is he getting his revenge? Why now?

    "The Burning" is notable in horror and movie history for a variety of reasons. First, it helped launch Harvey Weinstein, who wrote the picture, and his company, Miramax. Second, it was a career starter for Jason Alexander ("Seinfeld"), Holly Hunter and Fisher Stevens ("Short Circuit"). No doubt, this is probably also director Tony Maylam's highest profile work, having otherwise worked on videos of cars and concerts.

    Tom Savini is on board for special effects, which you know means quality. Any of the early 1980s slashers had to have Savini to be memorable. "Maniac" and "The Prowler", of course, and "Friday the 13th". Besides working with George A. Romero, the man is a living legend.

    Can you get this film uncut? I'm not sure. I have heard rumor of an extra three minutes that I'm fairly sure I didn't see in my version. While the gore was decent, it was not on par with Savini's best work, and the notorious "raft scene" was much more tame than I expected.

    The debate can go on whether or not this is a ripoff of "Friday the 13th". Some say it obviously is, others insist the script was written before the bigger film came out. I say that either way, this is the better of the two films, and the only connection is a killer stalking a camp. It's not like that idea hasn't been used plenty of times since then...

    Pick up this film if you can find a copy. It's not well-known for some reason, but well worth tracking down and keeping in a serious horror collection.
  • Coventry12 December 2004
    This is not even a rip-off from "Friday the 13th"; it's almost an exact clone! Most 80's slashers at least try to bring some change in setting, the killer's background or continuity, but Maylem's film doesn't. Period! The plot features the exact same group of teenagers during summer camp. Just as it was the case in "Friday the 13th", the teens play stupid pranks, take canoe-trips (guided by banjo-music stolen from "Deliverance") and tell spooky campfire stories. The killer, Cropsy – what's in a name – shows strange resemblance to Jason Vorhees as he also is the dude everyone always picked on. So, this movie shamelessly steals all the elements that made F13 so popular. So what? If you manage to find a fully uncut version, you'll be exposed to some of the most repulsive and nauseating slaughtering ever shot! The Burning is gore to the max and that's exactly what makes it exceptional in its field. They really don't make 'em as bloody as this anymore. The nowadays horror directors should take a good look at movies like "The Burning" in order to find out how to really disgust and shock the viewers. The infamous raft sequence explicitly shows the massacre of five young teens, not leaving much to the imagination. Maestro Tom Savini's make-up effects provided this movie with a well-deserved spot in the notorious video-nasties list! As far as redundant teen-slashers go, this is a must see!
  • In 1980, "Friday the 13th" streamlined the slasher formula begun by 1978's "Halloween" (itself a disciple of Alfred Hitchock's "Psycho"), adding to the mix buckets of fake blood spilling out of bodies impaled by axes, arrows, and knives; in the successive decade (and beyond), filmmakers would run this commercial template into the ground (with varying degrees of success). That films like "The Prowler" (directed by Joseph Zito, who also did the third "Friday" sequel) and Tony Maylam's "The Burning" are remembered as such "standouts" today owes more to their timing and the expertise of FX go-to-guy Tom Savini than any sort of creativity. While "The Burning" comes out a more worthwhile rip-off than "The Prowler," it still pales in comparison to the first "Friday," which also possessed a technical competence and craft in creating suspense, no matter how derivative. Here, we have a horrible camp groundskeeper named Cropsy, who is horribly burned during a prank gone wrong and lives to wreak havoc on about two dozen horny, rock-stupid teens (including a pre-"Seinfeld" Jason Alexander) who can't even die convincingly. While the early POV shots are executed with some skill, and a notorious setpiece on a raft provides a sudden rush of inspiration, the best effects come during the conclusion (which hinges on a twist that everyone should see coming from frame one), even leaving the door open for a sequel (which, not surprisingly, never materialized). "The Burning" may be the best of the "Friday the 13th" rip-offs, but that really isn't saying much.
  • This movie is crap.

    Let's get what's 'good' about this movie out of the way first: Tom Savini did the special effects and he did a pretty good job. There's a couple of scenes of full frontal nudity. You get to see some annoying kids get violently dispatched.

    The problem is it's nothing new and nothing special. It felt like the Weinstein's wrote the script after reading Slasher Films For Dummies. If the only slasher movie you've seen before this one is the original Friday the 13th, you can still predict everything that will happen. This movie isn't even a copy of Friday the 13th. It's a copy of a copy. It felt like the people making this movie didn't like or understand horror movies. They hit all the right notes for a slasher movie without seeming to understand the genre. It's no surprise that these guys would later head up Dimension films and churn out endless Screams, Final Destinations and I Know What You Did Last Summers.

    When you think about it, there's no rhyme or reason for anything that happens in this movie. An angry guy picks a bunch of kids at random and bumps them off. No, never mind. That sounds like the plot to an okay movie at least. There is zero suspense or tension in this flick. For the first forty minutes or so at camp, NOTHING happens. This time isn't used to foreshadow anything or establish the killer's motivation or anything. Just a half hour or so of weird looking kids at summer camp. At the end they sort of try to tie it back to the beginning, but when the big 'revelation' happens, you realize that even though you as a viewer can see a connection, the killer wouldn't have this info.

    I don't know. Most of the other reviews I've read for this movie are pretty enthusiastic, so maybe it's me. But aside from the over-the-top violence and copious nudity, this film was a total letdown. And is it just me, or are garden shears just sort of a goofy weapon?
  • The Burning (1981) is an instant classic slasher horror flick, puts most of horror movies today to shame. This movie come out the same year as did Friday the 13th Part 2 my favorite horror film. They are so many horror films in 1981 I haven't hear, see or they are forgotten. This movie however surprised me. "It ripped off Friday the 13th" no it didn't! This movie was different, it was a revenge film but it was different than Friday the 13th. It is an original story not a copycat of other slasher films. Honestly I think this movie is much way better horror movie than Friday the 13th Part 2. This movie has a different story, it is not that bad and it is a good slasher movie and it just become my favorite horror film.

    The story follows campers from summer camp goes with canoe trip to Devil's Creek once there they become targets, from a former summer camp caretaker, horribly burned from a prank gone wrong, with a pair of hedge clippers to take revenge on the campers. Once there they are trapped while assailant is stalking them and kills them one by one.

    I enjoy this film it is not a bad slasher horror film it is instant classic and really puts most of horror films to shame. It has a lot of nudity with girls been naked and sexy. This days I don't see any naked girls in any slasher horror films today. They don't make horror movies like this one in the woods today. Back in the 80's was more work than today. Tom Savini from Dawn of the Dead makes special effect for more gory blood and they work. Just like he did special effects for Friday the 13th, Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter and Dawn of the Dead he makes effects for this movie and the gory kills really works. There is a lot of scares and twists in here that keeps getting you interested and intense. It doesn't allowed you to stop watching it. Friday the 13th part 2, My Bloody Valentine, The Burning, The Howling and American Werewolf in London are really in my top five favorite films from 1981 in horror genre. Why can't we get movies like this?

    Directed and original story by Tony Maylam who directed the film really good. I miss movies like this today and I think it is a really good movie. Brian Matthews, Brian Backer, Carrick Glenn and Carolyn Houlihan were believable at acting and they were really good. 8/10 this movie is an instant classic in the horror genre from the 80's for me.
  • I was pleasantly surprised. Sure, it's basically your usual slasher horror flick, more specifically of the teens-in-summercamp type, and sure, it looks a bit out-dated (1981!), as far as hair- and clothes-styles go. The story is a bit flimsy (some years earlier a camp-caretaker was heavily hurt by an unfortunate prank and now he's back for revenge on.... well, on virtually everyone), and although there's a fair amount of gore, by the way pretty well done, the killings themselves are filmed rather abrupt and sketchy, it's as if you'd need to press the slow reverse button to see what actually happened.

    But still there is something extra in this movie, a sort of charming freshness (if you can say that of a horror flick), and in my opinion that's especially due to the acting. It's as if the makers didn't script anything but just let the kids think of things to do and say spontaneously, it gives it all a very natural and by that realistic feel. There are also beautiful settings of a sun-soaked lake and forest, an inventive paradox to the horrifying happenings.

    With the awareness of the nowadays #me-too movement in mind, there are some scenes that really couldn't be made like that anymore, at several points young girls are harassed, overwhelmed and practically raped by horny teens who don't take no for an answer. And the various nude scenes are totally gratuit, it's for instance cringeworthy to see how the camera zooms in on the breasts of a girl taking a shower. When on the credits of the movie the name "Harvey Weinstein" prominently appears as producer and writer, you cringe a bit more, but that's with todays knowledge. Let's not forget that in those 80's days we all found these kind of things in a horror flick the most normal thing ever, flicks without a fair amount of sex and nudity were considered boring and prudish. Well, that's what evolution and progressed insight means, not a bad thing, I would say.

    So to sum it up: taken the age and horror clichés into account, it's not a bad movie with a surprisingly good crew of young actors and a very satisfying amount of well-done gore.
  • izzypito10 August 2020
    1/10
    Awful
    Warning: Spoilers
    The plot made sense but what the heck was up with this camp?? Was this camp for college kids? Also, they could've added a little more mystery to this movie. Be prepared to watch nothing much happen until almost 45 minutes into the movie. Boring until the final act.
  • One of the first (and best) horror films to follow in the massive success of Friday the 13th (1980) is this terrifically bloody slasher film.

    Prank leaves camp caretaker horribly disfigured and ready for some harsh vengeance. Enter a band of teenagers and a sharp pair of garden shears...

    While admittedly The Burning isn't the most well-written horror movie of the period, it's definitely one that delivers great atmosphere and suspense. Even better for genre fans, it boasts the spectacular gore FX from master makeup artist Tom Savini. The FX in this film are highly bloody, especially during the infamous 'raft' scene. This, along with a spirited cast, nice wilderness locations, and a tension-filled electronic music score makes this film a pretty well done slasher flick. Oh, also there's a good bit of nudity which helps to make it even more of a guilty pleasure for slasher fans.

    Cast-wise the movie holds its own too. Brian Matthews makes for an OK leading man, but it's really the supporting cast that highlights here. Young Jason Alexander and Fisher Stevens both make their film debuts here (along with a passing Holly Hunter) and prove to be likable goofs. Also good is Larry Joshua as the beefy camp bully.

    So slasher fans, The Burning is one flick that's not to be missed. Be sure to find an uncut version of it though.

    *** out of ****
  • Another in the endless stream of psycho-hack movies with a lot of second-class , unpaid actors relentlessly pursued by a maniac-killer .The film becomes an unrelenting exercice in stark horror , loaded with repulsive gore in scene after scene . A summer camp caretaker , horribly burned from a prank gone wrong, is released from an institute and years later, he goes back to the camp with a pair of hedge clippers to take vengeance on the campers. There he lurks around an upstate New York summer camp bent on killing the teens responsible for his disfigurement. Gather Around the Campfire to Die! It will take you further than fear !. A legend of terror is no campfire story anymore! Don't look he'll see you. Don't breathe he'll hear you. Don't move you're dead !. What happened one summer 5 years ago is about to happen again! And again!! And again!!!Today is not Friday the 13th. But if you see this movie alone... you'll never be the same again!.Come Face To Face With The Creation of Evil!.If you go down to the woods today... Watch out for Cropsy!

    The film displays thrills , chills , cardboard horror , tension and lots of blood and gory scenes for nauseating execution . The concept of the movie originally scripted as "The Cropsy Maniac" is plain and simple , the typical series murderer who proceeds an astonishing massacre. This time the grisly murders are ruthlessly executed by a janitor who was accidently burned severely at a summer camp from a prank . Extremely scary and eerie with abundant stabbing shots , including nice make-up and adequate special effects by the great expert Tom Savini, in fact Savini turned down "Friday the 13th II (1981)" to work on this . As always, a series killer makes an authentic slaughter with gruesome and bloody assassinations using his supernatural and huge force and his regular garden clipper . After successes as John Carpenter's Halloween and Sean S. Cunningham's Friday the 13th expanded a lot of rip-offs or imitations and one of the best ones resulted to be this ¨The burning (1981)¨. Rated R for violence , gore , nudity and profanity. In The Burning appearing some familiar and young faces as Leah Ayres , Jason Alexander, Holly Hunter and Fisher Stevens who subsequently to be continued decent cinematic careers.

    This Harvey Weinstein production is decent enough , being well directed by Tony Maylan at his best , despite of various difficulties involved . Resulting in one of the biggest grossing horror films ever made and being debut feature film produced by Harvey Weinstein . Maylan is a little prolific filmmaker expert on Thriller genre as ¨Journal of a contract killer¨ , ¨Split second¨ , ¨Phoenix Blue¨ , ¨The riddle of the sands¨and Horror as ¨The burning¨ . This is an overwhelming tale story in Slasher genre with suspense , villainy , chills and lots of blood and gore. Recommended for those with strong stomachs.
  • It's pretty obvious that the creators of The Burning was making a clone of Friday the 13th. It's nothing else than plagiarism. A disfigured, insane monster/janitor/burn-victim with the strength of ten men, slaughtering a bunch of sex-crazed teenagers on summercamp.

    The only cool thing about this move is the actors. A young Jason Alexander and Holly Hunter appears in this movie. That's about it. This is not a scary movie. I give it a 1/10.
An error has occured. Please try again.