Add a Review

  • Kusturica is something of a challenge for me to parse. The experience is a bit troubling because it seems so genuine that we should be ashamed for intruding. He does not seem to accomplish this by ordinary means. Yes, the acting is good, but what works here is something quite a bit deeper than usual.

    Instead of the world of the film coming to us, as is usually the case, he inserts the camera in such a way that we – or rather our intent to see – brings it into being. This is an early film, and already he seems to have mastered the art of composition. This has a couple of his trademarked panning sequences that are the most elaborately choreographed I know. But more than that, each scene progresses through what seems to be an ordered diorama of gypsy projection. It is intensely human. I can imagine the filmmaker crying as he blocks the shot and places the actors, lights, camera.

    I can imagine him obsessing over how objects and shadows form families that work the way the central family does here. I can see his passion in how he guides the camera in arcs that are unnatural. It is a wonder he continued to make films, such is the obvious cost.

    A lost nation. A lost larger family. A lost love. Do we remember? Can you?

    Because I encounter young filmmakers, and see their first works, I know it is possible to spring whole into the art, allowing open completion of soul to make up for insufficient craft. As time went on, Emir learned to layer humor and circumstance, to tell a story. But nothing he will do can match this, his first love.

    Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
  • deee-215 July 1999
    I've seen this piece very shortly after I've seen Underground(which is my personal no.1). I was prepared for another energy daredevil movie trip into metaphor and symbolism - I was surprised and pleased ... Kusturica has shown ability to produce two absolutely different movies - both superb!

    Do you remember Dolly Bell? is funny, sad, romantic, mystic ... and it is real, it is not a movie to go for if you are not in a mood to think and think a lot ... it is a movie about communism and its philosophy as understood by each generation - I've lived those times and I accept: this is not the typical life we lived, but it defines the essence of how we felt and what we did...
  • Emir Kusturica's first film Do You Remember Dolly Bell? is a bittersweet comedy set in the former Yugoslavia during the 1960s. The film, which won the Golden Lion Prize at the 1981 Venice Film Festival, is both a coming of age story and a tribute to the city of Sarajevo, long before it was devastated by civil war. To the chagrin of his strict Communist father (Slobodan Aligrudic), sixteen-year old Dino (Slavo Stimac) is more into hypnosis and self-help mantras than Marxist ideology. He recites the phrase "Every day in every way I'm getting better and better" and sings in a new band mandated by the local Eastern European bureaucracy as they relax the Communist grip and allow some influence of Western culture.

    Dino's family of six live in a cramped one-room house while they wait for state housing. The father drinks excessively and the family is poor. This is underscored when, during a visit to relatives, the youngest boy makes a point of saying how much he wishes he had a bicycle like the one he sees in the relative's home. Through Dino's relationship with Sonny, an unsavory pimp, he meets a cabaret singer and prostitute Dolly Bell (Ljiljana Blagojevic), named after a stripper in an Italian film they had seen recently at the Culture Club. Dolly is forced by Sonny to wait in the attic of Dino's home until he returns and Dino is a passive onlooker as a band of delinquent boys take their turn with her.

    Dino's sweet innocence captivates the young girl, however, and the two form a bond that results in Dino's sexual initiation and first love affair. Dino has to cope with his father's illness, a lung cancer that has become life-threatening and their days together reveal a much mellower man who tells Dino he knew about the girl in the loft and no longer disapproves his using hypnosis and auto-suggestion. While Dolly Bell lacks the polish and cinematic flair of Kusturica's later work, it is an honest and intelligent film, one that avoids sentimentality and provides compelling insight into what it meant to grow up in Eastern Europe during the sixties.
  • Quite simply, this is - together with "When Father Was Away on Business" - Kusturica's best film. Stylistically, the film is quite different from Kusturica's later efforts, starting with "Time of the Gypsies", but this film needs no flashy style to impress you; it is the way Kusturica tells the story and the nature of characters that draws you in instantaneously. A lot of it has to do with the screenwriter Abdulah Sidran who also worked with Kusturica on the follow-up "When Father..." (which, incidentally, deals with the same family), and who more than successfully translated his, Kusturica's and, in a way, Sarajevo's collective past onto a page (Sidran has a book by the same title) and the basis for the film. In many respect, this is the film that introduced Sarajevo and its cultural idiosyncrasies to the rest of then-Yugoslavia and put it on the country's cultural map. As strange as it may sound, before "Dolly Bell" Sarajevo was, culturally and - to some extent - otherwise, the big unknown to the rest of Yugoslavia - 'tamni vilajet', as it was referred to. The film, however, changed all of that. Whatever you may think of Kusturica and his later films, you cannot deny the superbness and extraordinary importance of his early works. See them and enjoy.
  • Post written by a person nicknamed No Gods, perhaps just proves that this movie may not be for consumption by audiences outside of the Balkans. He/she completely missed the point. There's so much more to this movie, watching it was of great joy and delight for me.

    It gives an honest, simple and raw account of Sarajevo realities back in the 1960s, when it was an expanding city in Tito's Yugoslavia. 'Dolly Bell' offers many memorable snapshots that it uses as setting: teenagers mimicking Adriano Celentano, audiences watching 'Rome by night', couples with children dreaming of moving into new housing complexes built by the communist government, lunches with extended family members, community center struggling to buy instruments for their band.....etc, etc. And all this while the main character Dino (played by Kusturica's favourite Slavko Stimac) is finding his way through adolescence.

    Basically, the movie is Kusturica's and Sidran's love letter to their respective childhoods, which happened to take place during an interesting time in Yugoslav history not too long after World War II when the country was being rebuilt under new social order and a tangible sense of excitement of participating in something good and worthy was felt amongst certain sections of its population.

    Kusturica would of course go on to make much more serious and challenging films later in his career, but this one shows his ability to successfully deal with simple stories that are not driven by big, complex ideas and don't have an instantly dramatic setting.
  • Excellent. One word to describe the hour and a half of a master-piece.I'm not so sure that non-ex-yugoslav audience would use word master-piece but I think we would all agree that we are talking about excellent , marvelous , memorable (and etc) movie.Well , to be honest , I never expected less from Emir Kusturica as a director teamed with Abdulah Sidran (who is a poet) as a screenplay writer , who gave the movie intelligent and funny dialogues (really a lot of quotes to remember) combined with deep and memorable talking about communism brought to the audience trough the words of main character Dino's father (whose occupation is head waiter in the restaurant). But , before everything `Do you remember , Dolly Bell' is a movie who drags you to the past , to the ‘60s in the Sarajevo , Yugoslavia , making you wish that you were there then , just to feel the life of the previous generations in the communist system in the time of yugoslav `brotherhood and unity'. Except that it is also the movie about life in the tough neighbourhood full of scoundrels of any kind. After all, Dolly Bell is a victim of the one of them , and Dino tryes to rescue her in the name of love what gives the movie romantic note.One more good thing in the movie is guaranteed – the music.It's simply marvelously selected so it really gives the right image of the ‘60s in Sarajevo (of course you ought to know that in the ‘70s Sarajevo became capital of ex-yugoslav rock ‘n' roll , so in some way movie represents roots of rock ‘n' roll in Yugoslavia). So , what more to say than – watch the movie and you'll remember Dolly Bell for the rest of your life.
  • Kusturica's first feature-length film when he was 27, a teenage story in Sarajevo. The growth of a young boy who faces the first experience of sex with Dolly Bell, his odd family members and his band.

    The film is typical of Kusturica, full of noisy but cozy music, funny and distinctive characters. And sometimes the bittersweet feeling haunts me quite a long time during the film. I haven't seen a lot of Emir's works, besides this one I have only seen "Black Cat, White Cat", love the satirical comedy style, great way to magnify the neglectable truth of the society.

    Hypnosis and Communism, quite different stuff but all some kind of Utopian, I live in a socialistic country and watch a film from Yugoslavia which used to be a socialistic one, but failed. So many similarities can find between peoples, lively and spiritual-satisfied with the situations. We cannot realize Communism by hypnosis, in a real world, that's cruel but true.

    Loneliness is always the most severe sickness among people, even this film has so many characters, but still you can smell the loneliness throughout it, it's nothing to do with Communism or Capitolism, the hopelessness is always buried inside deeply in our hearts.

    Do you remember Dolly Bell? after watching this movie, I cannot remember her look, just a vague silhouette, because everyone has his or her own image of Dolly Bell, we can say goodbye to our youth thoroughly, thank every Dolly Bell and smile.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The first scene of 'Sjecas li se Dolly Bell' ('Do You Remember Dolly Bell') happens in a tern meeting room, where old people debate the dire state of the morals of the youth and decide that what they need to make a change in their lives is a musical band. The people debating are badly dressed, they use a wooden language, they do not believe what they say, but playing the game of political meetings is part of their lives. The second scene happens someplace in the hills. Music is loud and trash, people are unhappy but funny in their way, there is force and life beyond the poverty of the landscape around. I think that even if I did not know that this is the first full time feature film of Emir Kusturica I would have made the association and recognized that we are in Kusturica's universe. The main lines and the personality unique to the work of one of the greatest directors of our time are already present.

    The moment in time when this film was made was 1981. This is significant from many points of view. At the end of the decade Communism will be brought down in Europe, and in retrospective we can say that the signs were there (and this film can be seen as an example) but nobody would have believed it, certainly not the people living with no apparent hope and future behind the Iron Curtain. The film is made in Sarajevo (the city of birth of Kusturica) and the action happens a little more than a decade before, at the start of a period of relative relaxation in the politics of the Communist Yugoslavia. The same number of years after the making of the film the name of the city will become a symbol of the inter-ethnic and religious conflict of the Balkans, the place where neighbors killed each other blindly and relentlessly in the aftermath of the Yugoslav union. The seeds of the conflict are visible in this film as well, in a scene towards the end where dispute arises between the traditional way of mourning of the Sarajevo Muslims and the Communist ways. The conflict seems to emerge from nothing and be about nothing, it cannot be understood by an outsider, but are not so all conflicts where people fight each other for symbols letting humanity slide away from their minds?

    The film can be read as a political film, and it took certainly a lot of courage for Kusturica to make it this way. Describing the lack of perspective and hope of a full generation, or even bringing to screen a coming to age obsessed by sex and pain may be universal themes when the film is made in freedom, but was no easy thing to bring to screen in Yugoslavia in 1981. It is also a very human film, which gives birth to a plethora of characters like the ones that will continue to populate 'the land of Balkans according to Kusturica' in his next few great movies. It's not a perfect film, it takes off a little bit slowly and heavily, but when we get into the action and the feelings of the characters we start to deeply care for them. The father acted by Slobodan Aligrudic is an unforgettable figure with his mix of irony and ideological stiffness, of rudeness and hidden tenderness. Welcome to the world of Emir Kusturica!
  • Ordet16 August 1999
    Seeing "Dolly Bell" during the recent war in Kosovo forced me to think of the political significance of the film. Almost twenty years after the film was made, Yugoslavia is an extraordinarily different place, albeit one in which traditions die hard. But whether considered in relation to the Yugoslavia of the early 80s or to today's Serbia, what impresses about "Dolly Bell" is its filmmakers' devotion to art and the human condition rather than to a political agenda. It has not become an artifact because it was made to provoke human sympathy, not political reaction. "Dolly Bell" is not a tragicomic masterpiece like "Underground" nor a celebration of optimism and levity in the face of absurdity and injustice as are "When Father Was Away on Business" and "Time of the Gypsies": it is not Kusturica's most clever film, but it is perhaps his most enduring.
  • valadas15 September 2005
    In a style that reminds us of Italian neo-realism of last century forties and fifties, Kusturica gives us in syncopated sequences the story of a not so wealthy family whose head is a die-hard Marxist who still believes that communism will come in 2000 (this movie dates back to 1981). The youngsters of the family, however and like youngsters all over the world, are more inclined to rock music than to communism. The story develops itself in episodes of great realism in terms of images, against the background of socialist Yugoslavia which appears here and there in the speeches of a local official who thinks that juvenile delinquency can be fought by creating a juvenile rock ensemble in a club, in the Marxist talk of the old father and in the efforts he makes to get a house provided by the State to replace the squalid dwelling where the family lives. Ironically this will come only after his death. Behind the apparent simplicity of the story we feel that its characters have deepness of feelings and reactions, being very human. Love is present in its various forms though shown almost bashfully. The love between father and son and the love between the son and the young prostitute for instance. The action takes place in Bosnia but nothing in the movie makes us to surmise the bloodbath that occurred there 20 years after. In conclusion we can say this is a good and well made movie.
  • gavin694217 March 2016
    A young man (Slavko Štimac) grows up in Sarajevo in the 1960s, under the shadow of his good, but ailing father, and gets attracted by the world of small-time criminals. They hire him to hide a young prostitute (Ljiljana Blagojević) and he falls in love with her.

    As a first feature, this is definitely a solid effort. It is lacking in the dark humor and all that we have grown to love, but even a decent story in itself makes for a good film. A young boy falling in love with a prostitute? Always a nice theme.

    The picture quality, at least on the version I saw, was pretty poor. This is most likely because of the source. Has Criterion picked this title up yet? If not, they should, as it deserves the attention and a blu-ray upgrade (if possible) would do wonders.
  • whichever corner of the balkans is called home, it is all but unuarguable that Kusturica is the region's greatest filmmaker. i have enjoyed all of his films - most especially "Otac na sluzbenom putu" and "Underground" - but none disturbed me quite like this one disturbed me.

    the reason is that he portrays a (former) Yugoslavia i do not know, and have never known. both my parents fled the "acceptable face of communism" during the very years this film shows almost nostalgically. they were roughly the same age as the main character, yet their experience of Tito's paradise was completely and utterly apposite to what Kusturica shows on the screen. the world they knew was one of deprivation and disappearances and harassment and they could not get away from it fast enough.

    i am not saying either viewpoint is right or wrong. i just find it eye-openingly disturbing that the same place at the same time can be remembered in such radically different ways.

    i believe there is a lesson in that for all of us, especially those of us whose roots lie in the balkans.
  • Finally I had a chance to see this fantastic film recently which is better than my expectation. Simply it's an awful shame that not many people in the world haven't seen this film. I really love the scene that drunken father comes home and all the boys have to sit for a daily meeting. I'd love to see this film again.
  • Do You Remember Dolly Bell? is a sweet and good natured coming of age tale which lands around about half way between attempting to get across a really well intended and light hearted story of early adulthood with an atmosphere of a 'universal' kind with a downtrodden, gangster infused, less-than-well-off and quite scary feel about things. Then-first time Yugoslavian director Emir Kusturica spends the best part of the piece looking at the thematic ideas of growing up and first interactions with the opposite sex twinned with what it is to assert yourself; grow a sense of individualism; as well as find one's interests and general form. These ideas are bitten off with the intent to chew them all up real good, but everything sort of falls half way between this light-hearted study of adolescence and heavy study of harsh realities of living in the time and place it's set.

    Kusturica is setting out to tell a tale of coming of age; his lead is a young boy of whom it is established is observant of the world around him, and I think this observant nature is a recent characteristic of his persona. He watches films within this film, the piece constructing his gaze at the images on the screen in the local viewing theatre accordingly; his interest in items of a political nature are got across when he talks with his father about Communist merits and there is certainly that general sense he's forming his own identity as skills and interests in playing a musical instrument and learning a mite of a foreign language (Italian, in this case) is put across in a few scenes that advance the character as an individual more-so the film overall. Indeed, the recurring line the lead merrily sings, namely "Everyday, I'm getting better in every way" enforces the transition.

    The lead is a certain Dino (Štimac), a young man whom hangs out with his friends as they smoke and drink while suffering through one another's tired, false stories of how they've interacted in certain ways with girls in recent days. Of the friends he has, the most prominent is a taller boy named Marbles. Things get complicated when some shady local individuals want Dino to hide a call girl for them, something Dino accepts and goes on to stow her away in a barn-come-bird hutch of some description located within his house's grounds, to the rest of his families unbeknownst. The girl is the one of the title, a certain Dolly Bell (Blagojevic). Of his family, it's established that a pretty ordinary evening with them consists of sitting around a table as talk of exactly what it was they did during their day is instigated by the father. To the side of them as they all sit around opposite one another is a leak in the roof as the rain pours down, a metaphorical seeping through the blockade as Dino, his sister and the rest of them admit to feelings and desires which are seeping through their minds and coming out as an expression of intent.

    In Do You Remember Dolly Bell?, you have an idea or a premise – the notion that specific content I find quite interesting is playing out. So why is it the film felt as underwhelming as it was? It feels inconsistent, too often opting for unnecessary and somewhat kooky content which frustrates more than it does either add to the character study unfolding in front of us or make us laugh; if we've seen the band play that somewhat annoying song once or twice, we don't need it an extended third time. This, and a rather bizarre trip to some relatives, as an entire sub-plot revolving around some local council bigwigs and their want want to hire Dino, the boys and their band to play for other local youngsters, quite frankly, could have been entirely scrapped. The film additionally carries an upbeat tone, something that doesn't entirely sit – there's a real lack of threat, which is especially odd given what's at stake with his family, the hidden girl and the local criminals. Certain revelations do unravel, but they carry very little dramatic weight and fizzle out as they play out.

    Compared to another film of this ilk from around the time, namely Bill Forsyth's Gregory's Girl, Do You Remember Dolly Bell? plods along and feels unconcentrated as the USP around which the coming of age study is played out gets shoved towards the back and forgotten about. I also think Kusturica wants to raise awareness of times gone by, indeed life at a time when living in Yugoslavia may well have been less glamorous than it might have been in the then modern day when the film was produced. Is there a specific reason the film is set in the early 1960s – a whole two decades prior to the film's production? This comes across as somewhat needless, as if the director is attempting to get across the idea that coming-of-age and growing up in all walks of life, regardless of nation; nationality; conditions or time, is the same. The basing of this tale so far back in the then-twenty years ago past acts as a trigger designed to evoke a faux sense of nostalgia, a sense that it unfolds in the past and the subject matter playing out most certainly happened to the designated audience in the past. While I haven't seen any of the director's other films, I'm informed that he's gone on to have quite a career; cracking the American scene and making some rather acclaimed films. Do You Remember Dolly Bell? is a calling card; a clear and relatively well executed demonstration that he can handle the subject matter which he only really renders ever-so slightly interesting.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Dino is a young man living with his eccentric family in the Bosnia of the early '60s. Foreign culture was just starting to bleed through into the public consciousness. Dino is tasked by a criminal friend of his with hiding a prostitute. The girl is beautiful and Dino falls in love.

    There is a great short movie in Kusturica's "Dolly Bell". The problem is you have to wade through many tedious passages to before getting to it. Kusturica shows first love with admirable compassion and restraint. The scene where the girl must tend to her job is gut wrenching.

    However, the scenes with the boy's friends and family are nowhere near as interesting. This was apparently a watershed time in Bosnia's history. This is hinted at subtly and affectionately. The problem is the on a character level. None of Dino's friends or family are engaging. The movie tries to paint a broader picture of life in that time and place, but it's the specific scenes of young love you will care about.
  • No pun intended - I only watched this once, but I am still struggling to figure out, if this is meant to make communism look good or bad ... or maybe that is it. It is supposed to be unclear and the viewer has to make up his or her mind about it. I only know that it is more than just that, in case you are afraid this is going to get too political. This is about life ... about growing up ... about first loves (literally and metaphorically speaking), heartaches and many other things.

    Would it make sense to share eveything? I would assume that no - unless you are one of the people who probably would not get anything otherwise. Families can be dysfunctional ... and while love is always the strongest bond ... there are other factors that decide fate and feelings ... this is quite complex and I thought it would be something different to be honest, but it was a pleasant surprise. If you like Dramas, you can't do anything wrong here.
  • One of Kusturica's earliest films, it displays many a common thing in the old communist Yugoslavia but still has an interesting setting and story that would classify as less common, but yet not entirely unrealistic.

    In short this is a drama with some comedy moments. To fully appreciate the film you would actually need to have been there around the 70's, but even so it is an interesting drama of a European country with influences from the east (Soviet) and the west (USA and others).

    This movie is highly recommendable, not just as a great drama/comedy but also as a great display of Bosnia some 30 years back.
  • Emir Kusturica have several film in his credit that can easily go in any movie encyclopedia. However, "Sjecas li se, Dolly Bell" is the most excellent because of its simplicity and romantism. The story takes us to Sarajevo in the middle of communism era in Yugoslavia, when almost everyone was euphoric about Yugoslavia and communism itself. The role played by Slobodan Aligrudic (father of the main character) is memorable !
  • Beautiful, beautiful movie! Mix of innocence, humor, love, family ties, art, social and political overview of Bosnia... We just loved the saying: "every day-in each way-i am enhancing myself". Very deep movie! Kusturica - kudos to you!!! Too bad we in US can not see all the movies that Kusturica made. We saw "When the father was away on a business"; "Do you remember Dolly Bell?" and "Underground". Wish we can see all his movies. We love his style and the deepness of the movies which are in the same time sad and funny... I guess they represent a mentality of people from Balkans - to be exact - from Bosnia and Serbia. A masterpiece! Emir Kusturica is a genius!
  • This debut film by Kusturica contains three layers.

    In the first place it is a coming of age movie like "Happy days" (1974 - 1984 TV series) and "The Commitments" (1991, Alan Parker). In Eastern Europe there was some tradition with respect to this genre as evidenced by movies like "Loves of a blonde" (1965, Milos Forman) and "Closely watched trains" (1966, Jiri Menzel).

    In the second place the film takes remarkable liberties in ridiculing the communist regime, at that time only possible in the relatively liberal Yugoslav republic. See for example the father managing his family as if it is a collectivity, making minutes of family discussions. See also the old local party boss, having no clue at all what drives young people, tackling the problem of juvenile delinquency. Last but not least, although the family already has grown up kids, it is still waiting for a suitable house.

    In the third place the film gives us the first hints of Kusturica's fascination for the Gypsy culture. A fascination he would later elaborate upon in films like "Time of the Gypsys" (1988) and "Black cat, White cat" (1998).
  • richkiel1 November 2021
    An incoherent story that never generates any interest. A reminder that Kusturica is a pretentious fraud. This film is practically unwatchable. Boring characters take turns featuring in boring scenes, and the minimalist 'plot' goes nowhere.