A sweet, small-scale movie, rarely shown and only available in a deleted full screen PAL VHS edition at present, this film was screened on Scottish TV on 19 April 2009 in widescreen. It's quite grainy and the sound isn't exactly DTS quality but the story's good and the performances are universally good. It's Conti's film and his acting is almost invisible - I hope that's a compliment - whilst Mirren is an excellent foil to him; their relationship is not uncomplicated and consequently very real. Glasgow is shown in its all its pre "...Miles Better" glory with tower blocks and grime to the fore with a 14 year old Ewen Bremner in a key role as underachiever Stevie Deans. A sad sign of our times is that the innocent and friendly physical contact between teacher and pupil seen in 1986 would no longer be tolerated in 2009. Has Blessed Edith Semple School been granted its longed-for miracles or is Vic simply a great teacher triumphing in difficult circumstances? You decide.
Add a Review
-
mike-h-williams19 April 2009
-
rmax3048234 October 2010My TV guide described this as a movie about a man who acquires miraculous powers and losing a brain tumor after a fall from a roof. Well, that's enough to make the heart of any normal human being sink. I could see it now -- the uplifted eyes, the heavenly choirs, the tears of despair and gratitude, the uplifting message -- "For those who believe, no proof is necessary," and so forth.
Actually -- almost miraculously -- it wasn't like that at all. It's a mostly light-hearted treatment of some unexplainable stuff that happens in the life of a schlubby, calf-eyed teacher in a school for special children in Glasgow.
Richard Conti is the teacher, a nice-enough guy who is modest and goes along with the flow. He's not religious, although the school is run by Catholics. He's attracted to the school's music teacher, Helen Mirren. They're an interestingly mismatched couple. He's of no more than medium height, dark, droopy of features, and appears constantly slouched and moderate in every respect. She's blonde, vivacious, thymotic, moves from place to place quickly, has a long face with a soft nose and keen, perceptive eyes.
The TV guide was more or less right. He does fall from a roof, he loses a brain tumor, and strange things happen around him. But the description has the order wrong. First, some minor strange things happen. Instance: a record player that continues to run after she shuts the power off. Next, he's waiting at a bus stop, rolls his eyes without warning, and drops to the pavement. The hospital discovers a lethal brain tumor but tell him nothing since it's too late.
Next, he does fall from a roof while trying to rescue a frightened student, and falls more than 40 feet to the ground. A tree breaks his fall and he winds up with no more than a slight tear in his shirt and minor bruises. He's brought to the hospital again and X-rayed. The docs discover that the tumor has disappeared. "Tumors do remit," says the doc. Then Conti discovers that he can race through the city and all the red lights change to green just as he enters the intersections. One of his students, who could not walk, can now walk. The performance of others improve dramatically. Now, here's the kind of thing I appreciate, that prompts me to believe the movie has an adult audience in mind. The kid that finds herself able to walk does it off screen. We are spared the sight of poor little Alice MacKenzie standing up, dropping her crutches, and wobbling a few feet towards some guy who is calling out, "WALK, Alice, you can DO it!" I sobbed with relief. I groveled in gratitude.
The second half of the movie drags a bit, I thought, as the newspapers get hold of events and begins giving Conti and the other staff members the tabloid treatment. There were time when I wished the story could have been given the old Ealing Studios treatment, which would have pepped things up with its iconoclasticism. Miracles? Bloody hell.
The film was shot in Glasgow, which looks a lot more civilized than when I was there. I noticed a couple of Maxwells in the cast and crew and wonder if any are distant relatives, my Grand Daddy having been a bobby on the police force there. But I haven't been in Scotland in years. I wonder if Edinburgh still has that old stony castle on top of the hill, and if Ullapool has changed its name to something more dignified.
Anyway, if your TV guide makes this sound like an Afterschool Special, ignore it and watch the movie anyway. It's pretty good. -
plan9921 February 2023A bit disappointing when compared to the much superior, also set in Glasgow, comedy films directed by Bill Forsyth. The characters were lacking in, well character, and were not as interesting and crazy as those found in Mr. Forsyth's films. It would have probably got a higher score from me if there were no Forsyth films to compare it to but there are so just a 6 rather than an 8. Brian Pettifer has a regular stand at antique fairs and I've bought a few items from him but he does not like to have a discussion about his acting career which is fair enough. A slight disappointment but cheered up greatly by the presence of the lovely Helen Mirren.
-
richardchatten20 February 2023The city of Glasgow's a pretty rum setting for this typically twee eighties comedy in drab colours and with an already dated synthesiser score by B. A. Robertson. Usually it takes a blow on the head but Tom Conti is here endowed with miraculous powers as the result of a bad reaction to an anesthetic following a dental examination.
I particularly liked the trick with the traffic lights, but biggest miracle that enters his life has to be The Blessed Helen at her most charmingly unafffected. Both leads look somewhat out of place as teachers in a Glaswegian Catholic school, but the film is a fantasy after all. -
gavin69421 September 2015Vic Mathews (Tom Conti) teaches a remedial class at the Blessed Edith Semple School in Scotland. Some at the school are trying to discover the two more miracles that would promote the late Edith Semple to sainthood.
This comedy had positive reviews. I suppose I, too, would have to rate it positively. But I was saddened to see it dealt more with this teacher and his students than the idea of faith. The teacher is not a very strong believer, and it would have been good to have more conflict there, and maybe even a little thoughtful debate (without making it heavy and therefore no more a comedy).
For what it is worth, the title "Heavenly Pursuits" is the better title. Now it seems to be going by "Gospel According to Vic", but that is not nearly as clever and should be removed. -
A fairly tame but pleasant comedy about a non-believer who becomes the center point of what appear to be a series of miracles at a Catholic Scottish school.
To me, the real miracles in this movie was the excellent singing by the kids in Mirren's Music class, but also how technologically advanced the keyboard classes were. Mirren's Music class is miraculous in every way, i.e. Totally unrealistic.
What lead me to this otherwise very obscure film (that absolutely nobody ever mentions anywhere and of which I hadn't heard of even back in the 80s) was Helen Mirren's involvement in it. Because I hadn't seen much of her in many years I decided to give this a go, what with the premise being fairly solid as well.
(Helen or no Helen, there's no way I'm picking a film with her that has a garbage premise or is some mindless thriller, a stupid bio, or annoying "social commentary" turkey. She's been one of my favourite actresses since I was a teen, being pretty much the most stunning-looking thespian in the business for many years, but there's no actress that will get me to watch anything: the premise needs to be at least reasonably interesting.)
What bugs me are some confusing and muddled plot points.
I don't understand why Conti does the whole traffic-lights stunt, which makes him out to be a psycho or at least a very loose cannon, basically a lunatic. Besides, it seems out of his character. Why did he do it with Mirren in the vehicle? Why did he do it at all? If he had wanted to test his "powers" of "miraclizing" he would have done so much LATER in the script, when he started turning into a believer i.e. When he started having doubts. Besides, he - as this highly upright and selfless character - would have NEVER endangered Mirren's life that way, especially not at an early stage in the game while he was still a non-believer hence unlikely to test his luck in such a drastic and dangerous way. Nor was Mirren's reaction to surviving this tasteless stunt realistic. She half-smiles instead of slugging him in the face: that was out of character too, plus illogical.
I also fail to understand the ending. Conti rushes to the train station, to do what? Reconcile with Mirren? He didn't have a major tiff with her at all, so there was no need for that grand kiss at the station, as if something between them was settled. Were they going to visit Ewan, the "miracle student"? If so, for what purpose? The writer made it out to seem that Ewan was locked away in some attic or something.
I didn't understand the uber-aggressive reaction of the hospital staff toward Conti's visiting the injured pupil. They shoved him away from the premises as if he were some random hobo who tried to murder the kid. Overkill scene. Too dramatic for drama's sake.
There are all these bits and pieces in the script that appear somewhat off, odd, illogical. I mean, I know this is set in Scotland, but still... -
Red-Barracuda15 February 2024This Scottish comedy-drama is one which is pretty obscure nowadays and I can't say I even recall it from back in the day. It seems to have been coming from the same general ballpark as the Bill Forsyth blend of gentle, quirky comedies which were very popular back in the 80's. The story centres on a non-believing teacher at a Glasgow Catholic school which is on the lookout for two more verifiable miracles required in order to promote the woman who the school is named after - Edith Semple - to sainthood; some seemingly miraculous events follow, complicated by the fact they all seem to involve the atheist teacher.
Unlike the Forsyth films, this one does seem to lack the strong characterisation and funny moments; unfortunately, like the Forsyth films it also has an awful soundtrack and a complete absence of any cinematic style whatsoever, with all events taking place in a world of beige. But despite all this, its still a decent enough watch, at least to a certain extent. The cast and regional location are probably the best things about it, with mid 80's Glasgow making for an intriguing backdrop, while Tom Conti is a good enough lead, with reliable players such as Helen Mirren and David Hayman helping out with the heavy lifting. It was also quite a surprise to see a teenage Ewen Bremner pitch up as a sort of Scottish Rain Man and it was even better to enjoy the sorely missed Jenny McCrindle appear in her first role as one of Conti's pupils. On the whole, probably worth seeing this more for the cast and location than the fairly uninteresting story. A likeable Scottish obscurity, whatever the case. -
wes-connors13 January 2011Cynical schoolteacher Tom Conti (as Vic Mathews) works at the "Blessed Edith Semple" school in hard-headed Glasgow, Scotland. Mr. Conti teaches learning-disabled students, like Ewen Bremner (as Stevie Deans). The boy/girl integrated Catholic school is trying to obtain "Sainthood" from the Vatican for its namesake, who has one documented miracle to her credit; "Edith Semple" cured a girl's blindness. Combed-over Brian Pettifer (as Father Cobb) is trying to find two more miracles in the kind woman's past. Music teacher Helen Mirren (as Ruth Chancellor) shows off her hourglass figure. Although he's not much of a believer, Conti should get ready to reevaluate his belief in miracles - because he's about to unwittingly perform them!
***** Heavenly Pursuits (9/3/87) Charles Gormley ~ Tom Conti, Helen Mirren, Ewen Bremner, David Hayman -
writerchick196231 March 2006I'm going to begin by saying, this review might be a little biased, since I knew Mr. Gormley, who was gracious enough to offer his time and expertise to young screenwriters, whenever he recognized talent. When I met him (in 2003), I knew I'd heard his name before, but couldn't place how or when. It was only after that first meeting (at a local screen writing group) that I looked up his name on IMDb and realized he'd written one of my favorite movies of the 1980's.
"The Gospel According to Vic" is how I know this film; though, as you can see from the top of the info page, it's mainly known as "Heavenly Prusuits." It's not a big budget, blockbuster film, but it does contain a lot of heart, honesty, and decency. It's a story of miracles and belief -- what constitutes a miracle? What distinguishes a miracle from a happy accident or coincidence? Can you be a man of science and a true believer at the same time? Can miracles happen to non-believers? And just how comfortable are people with the idea of real miracles happening all around them?
I can't really pin down why I like this film so much, beyond the fact that it contains realistically drawn characters who deal with some basic philosophical questions. It's not a big film... not an action film or a broad comedy. It's the kind of movie you could share with your family and have a discussion about it afterward.
Conti and Mirren are brilliant, and even the minor players (like the Doctor and the Priest) are well-acted and fleshed out. Sometimes it's hard to understand the students' dialogue, if you see the film in its original release version (Mr. Gormley told me they'd actually dubbed the film later for the international version, using actors whose accents weren't as thick).
Well worth the effort, if you can track down a copy... -
Solly-15 March 2002I enjoy movies with British settings. While I prefer SAVING GRACE to this movie this one is more believable. Conti has a way of linking the ordinary with the extraordinary which gives the movie realism and depth. I would like to see it again but I lent this video out to someone several years ago and can't remember who!