User Reviews (9)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's a quite San Fernando neighborhood, all of a sudden victimized by the "Cocaine cowboys", a cartel like organization of ruthless murdering thugs who terrorize the neighborhood where World War II hero Charles Durning has lived for years. He has witnessed a horrifying assassination in his fellow veteran pal Bert Remsen's greasy spoon (a man trying to steal donuts) and now he utilizes his war memories to take down these vile humans who kill through powder and flying bullets.

    One of the great character actors of the 1970's through the early 21st Century, Charles Durning was the epitome of the scene stealing grandfatherly like older white gentleman, so to be given a lead at this stage of his career must have been a shock. He doesn't sidestep anything here, and yet, the script he's giving is so unpleasant and difficult to watch at times that in spite of some of the truths that it takes right off the pages of the Los Angeles Times, you feel like you're only getting a part of the story.

    Durning lives with his widowed daughter-in-law and beloved grandson, plays war games with him, and now finds him involved in war games that takes him right back to the combat he faced fighting the Japanese. The stereotypical Hispanic thugs he comes up against here are representative of only a small percentage of the Mexican population in Los Angeles, but that's pretty much all you see. All of these gang members have a purposely placed gold tooth and prominent tattoo, speak in a type of Spanglish lingo that makes them instant monsters with no redemption, and are photographed in multiple numbers that make you feel like you are around a dozen Willie Lopez types from "Ghost".

    Durning gives a sincere performance, expressing no racism on his own and even having a good black female friend in public defender attorney Pam Grier who treats him like a father and sets out to be his protector. The characterizations are either 100% noble or the contrast of completely evil and animalistic, and that would be acceptable if the individual situations that crop up during the film don't become frequently eye rolling.

    Durning, running through a barrage of enormous plastic containers, hides among them as if it was some giant maze, and the visual appeal of that scene makes it both frightening and fascinating. But for one extremely overweight older man to go through the things that he goes through and try to make the audience believe it after while becomes a bit too much. The beloved character actress Lu Leonard plays Durning's often maddeningly sweet and concerned neighbor, and while her presence is always welcome, the dialogue between her and Durning never seems real. She's a sweeter version of Gladys Kravitz, and instead of crying for "Abner" seems to be declaring, "Uh oh, there goes the neighborhood."

    Another strange scene has Durning in danger suddenly running into the side door of a strange woman's car passenger seat, forcing the frantic woman to drive him until he can get out safely. When he shows up at a pool hall and confronts the man he recognizes as the killer, he establishes the fact that he has the courage to deal with all this but once again, it does not ring true and indicates that just because something is on the page doesn't make it true, basically repeating something that a Japanese soldier had once said to him in combat.

    He then turns the house into a fortress, puts on combat make-up, and just waits. And of course he has his old arsenal of war weapons, another sign that ideas overtook reality in creating a story that could have been really tight but ends up becoming a combination of laughable situations that may have been taken from this and used in the "Home Alone" movies. It was at this point that I realized what I was watching was completely contrived, filled with stock villains who may get what's coming to them (including a crooked cop), but you can't help but find eventually laughable in spite of the fact that the situation is frightening and maddening. After a while, I wondered if Nancy Reagan perhaps had a hand in this film being made as part of her anti-drug campaign.
  • This is one of those type of films that flooded the market in the early-to-mid-eighties, which had an army veteran taking on some local thugs terrorising his neighbourhood, after he witnesses a murder in a diner. Sadly there's nothing new here. The same old set-up, but feebly done and not all that involving. Interesting cast works in its favour, but the support players Pam Grier (who had the most resourceful character) and James Keach (at the opposite end of the spectrum) can only do so much. Charles Durning is in the lead. Solid choice; but in saying that, there are too many implausible moments, which makes him stick out like a sore thumb. Not his portrayal, but what it psychically asked from him. I'll tell you he looks much leaner in that movie poster. Just wait around for the barnstorming climax... I found myself chuckling more so often than feeling anything truly threatening and tension induced. Like the phone booth scene. Everything moves at snail's pace and that includes some of Dunning's actions when coming up against these professional gangland killers. While the script might have social commentary evident and be familiarly dramatic, it just wasn't brought across all that convincingly and felt ham-fisted.
  • I have mixed thoughts about this movie. On one hand it is the genuineness of the plot and the characters that intrigues me but on the other hand it's the odd dialog in the script and the cheesy music that repels me. The acting isn't bad but so often the script makes no sense. I don't know what else to say except I was compelled to watch to the end and liked the cast and their performances (especially Charles Durning) but the direction, writing, and music get very low scores. 5.4/10.
  • nicholas.rhodes17 August 2001
    This film is quite a shocker through the tension it generates. The baddies are really quite frightening and suspense is maintained right up till the end. Well worth a viewing !
  • Charles Durning is out of his league in "Stand Alone". Durning is almost always worth watching but this movie stinks. It starts off kind of fun as Durning and his big belly get involved with the bad guys. But after twenty minutes or so, the movie becomes painfully dull. The script is paint-by-numbers urban action stuff. The cop characters are all poorly written. They act in totally unbelievable ways. In 1985 an older Charles Bronson was still making movies. Bronson could probably made something of this material. Durning and his big fat belly, on the other hand, just looks ridiculous running around fighting bad guys. "Stand Alone" is a swing and a miss.
  • There were no shortage of vigilante.movies following the success of Death Wish. However, by the mid 80's a lot of these movies were less believable or cartoonish. Take a look at Death Wish 3 to see what I am talking about. I thought Stand Alone was pretty good and I am a little surprised that I am just discovering this movie now. I would say this is comparable with a British vigilante film that came much later ( Harry Brown), but much less bleak than that film. Charles Durning is very believable as a loveable old grandpa that is pretty tough and decorated WW2 veteran. He comes across as an everyman, but is totally credible when he is threatened and proceeds to take out the trash. The supporting cast of Pam Grier and James Keatch don't hurt either. I don't know the actor's name, but the Latino guy who frequently plays a heavy in Walter Hill films is a great villain as the leader of The Skull Tattoo gang that has it out for Charles Durning. Even though this is an 80's movie the cheese is kept to a minimum and is taken fairly seriously. I just discovered this movie, and would definitely recommend it, Stand Alone is a solid action drama and a lot better than a bunch of vigilante action flicks that have gotten more attention.
  • I've always been a fan of action movies and tight thrillers. Death Wish was a fav of mine when I was young, and still is. So, I try to watch new ones as often as I can.

    Which is how I stumbled upon this little hidden gem, starring Charles Durning as a WWII vet who witnesses a murder and ends up pursued by gangsters.

    This is quite an obscure film. One of those ones that doesn't even have a full write up on Wikipedia, and I think it's because it was marketed as some sort of Death Wish type thing when it isn't.

    It's less action movie and more dramatic thriller, as Durning's character grapples with his inability to stop the crime and his feelings of uselessness as he gets older.

    Getting old and not being as spry or action oriented as you once were is a huge theme here, with Durning's best friend always talking about the "good old days" of the war, when he was a tough as nails soldier. But we all get old, and it is a lot harder for some than it is for others.

    Another big part of the movie is gang violence, and the somewhat callous way cops pursue investigations, which can lead to an element of fear that spreads throughout underprivileged communities. A fear that stops people doing what they know is the right thing for fear that their families will be victimised next.

    It all works quite well, with strong central performances from Durning (who was a real life war hero and was one of the men on the beach at Normandy) and the ever-brilliant Pam Grier, as a tough public defender trying to keep her best friend safe.

    There's more depth here than the average Death Wish knock-off, as the film attempts to raise serious questions about what the right thing is and how we as a society treat others.

    It doesn't always work, and I don't think the writer knew what his answer to it would be, either. But it still is an interesting watch.

    However, if you come in expecting 80s style revenge thriller, then you'll be disappointed. Which is probably why the film didn't make much of a splash. Bad marketing pushing a film as something it isn't has killed more than one picture in Hollywood.

    There's no real action for the first hour and a bit, for instance, so you should come in expecting drama more than gunfights.

    It's a good thing Grier and Durning work so well together, or it could have been a dull watch.

    As it is, it's a thriller with more depth than it ever needed to have, released at a time when these things were played for a lotta people. That's the way the cake falls off a cliff, I suppose.

    You should seek it out. It deserves more attention than it got.
  • claypipe16 January 2005
    Throughly intense. Just goes to show why you should never judge a book by its cover. Charles Durning portrayal of an aging veteran is both surprising and fantastic. He's not the usual Gibson or Jackson type star Hollywood would use to enhance this character. The really scary factor in this movie is that it could actually happen anywhere. there's no super movie special effects, just straight out home brewed justice. This movie not only illustrates social and cultural stress of changing urban demographics, it delves deep into the psyche of post traumatic stress that many war veterans live with on a daily basis. Definitely a must see, you may never look at your war veteran neighbor the same again. Now, if this would only be distributed on DVD!
  • My review was written in May 1986 after a screening at Lyric theater on Manhattan's 42nd St.

    "Stand Alone" is a drama which takes its structure directly from an uncountable number of Westerns, updated to urban, crime ridden American society. Extremely mild, low-budget entry is a New World pickup filmed in L. A. in the summer of 1984 and quietly slipped into territorial release beginning last September.

    Charles Durning gets a rare starring (above the title) role as Gus Thibadeau, a decorated (by Gen. Macarthur, he's fond of telling everybody) World War II hero living quietly in a sleepy L. A. neighborhood with his daughter and a grandson.

    He witnesses a gangland-style murder executed by three latin youthsin a cafe owned by his old buddy Paddy (Bert Remsen) and reluctantly agrees to help police Det. Isgrow (James Keach) identify the suspects and testify against them.

    Thibadeau's young lawyer friend Cathryn Bolan (Pam Grier), who as a public defender encounters the chief suspect Santos (Luis Contreras), tries to convince Thibadeau not to get involved, noting that the drug smugglers involved in the killing will probably blow him away if he fingers the killers.

    Thibadeau decides to send his family away to stay in Long Beach and make his stand, going up to the attic to get his marine weapons and hold off the villains in his house.

    Though played fairly straight, the sight of Durning blacking up his face and making like Rambo is amusing.l His acting is solid, though the role is one-dimensional. Cast against type as a nice, professional woman, Grier is engaging, and it comes as no surprise in the final reel when she grabs a gun to protect lone wolf Durning against the killers. Rest of the cast is adequate.

    The big showdown could have used some of the suspense and thrills of "Straw Dogs", which it resembles structurally. Director Alan Beattie did a better job at atmospherics and grabbing the viewer in his previous film, a horror opus featuring Joseph Cotten: "The House Where Death Lives".