User Reviews (98)

Add a Review

  • A super intelligent teenage whiz revives the love of his life with a chip that used to belong to his robot pal BB. But things don't go all that smoothly as his creation proves to have homicidal tendencies.

    Is the film weird? You bet. Is it silly? Yeah, kind of. Is it hokey? Definitely. Is it entertaining? Surprisingly Yes.

    The film is probably as close as you can get to family oriented graphic horror. The characters are not only well acted but extremely likable and that takes the film a long way. Matthew L something brings warmth and charm to his role and his relationship with his mom is cute and wholly believable. Kristy Swanson is pure delight as his "girl next door love" and her robotic moves are surprisingly well executed. Like in A Nightmare on Elm Street, Wes Craven is able to create characters who you actually give a damn about and that's what makes this silly premise actually work.

    The film is pretty funny at times and the graphic horror is sure to delight gore hounds. The basketball scene alone is outstanding. For the most part Deadly Friend is more actual fun than suspenseful, although it does have a few well timed shocks.

    All in all; A nice effort from Craven. Pretty inventive and overcomes it's weaknesses by being just a plain old fun flick.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    My girlfriend told me of a movie she saw when she was little, about a robot who starts killing people. She couldn't remember much of it, but as I searched for it, she kept telling me how much it impressed her... Obviously this is, as with a lot of child's movie memories, a film which is over-romanticized but in actuality less good then you remember... Though after seeing it I was not really impressed, it left me with some mixed feelings..

    GOOD FEELINGS: Positive aspects of the film are in my opinion the idea behind it, Kristy Swanson, Wes Craven and the sometimes eerie music score by Charles Bernstein. Not really knowing what to expect, the film's opening of a car thief being stopped by BB (the robot) made me laugh immediately. The movie made me sad in a way, especially when BB gets blown to bits and the scenes with Kristy Swanson in her zombie form, desperately longing for Matthew Laborteaux' love. Wes Craven's signature is all over the film. With some scary dream sequences (I WAS scared when the father squirted blood all over the place while laughing like a madman) and some sets which looked extremely familiar to me (the cellar in which the father dies for instance, did anyone else got flashbacks of A Nightmare on Elmstreet?)

    BAD FEELINGS: On the other hand, there were numerous things which I found annoying. A at times very laughable plot, a basketball as a murder weapon and most of all an extremely lousy ending... I've read that Wes Craven wasn't particularly happy with this, wanting another ending and less mindless gore for gore, but the President of Warner Bros. thought differently. Too bad, as it doesn't do ANY good to the movie, which could have been so much more...

    CONCLUDING: Mixed feelings... Deadly Friend could have been a real cult classic, but doesn't reach for it in my opinion. Though there are some memorable moments (though the basketball-murder is absolutely ridiculous, I'll probably remember it for the rest of my life) and some good emotional moments (how did I feel for poor Kristy Swanson.) The BB robot is cute and you really feel sorry for Matthew Laborteaux when it gets destroyed, but all this barely saves the movie. Though I do not blame Wes Craven, who probably did everything he could to make the best of it, Deadly Friend is JUST good enough... The ending is a real downer, as it left me with disbelief and almost made me forget all the positive aspects of the film and I think the added gore doesn't add much to it as well... 5,5/10!
  • Okay, one of my fellow reviewers here on this site described this film in one marvelous – rather sarcastic – sentence. In fact, it's so well stated that I'm going to steal it for my own review. The premise of Deadly Friend, ladies and gentlemen: `Boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy creates lethal cyber-Barbie...'. Deadly Friend introduces Paul, an ultra-intelligent adolescent who build a robot that thinks and handles completely for itself. The robot – B.B – is the purest, most advanced piece of technology ever yet it talks with a peppy, blurry voice. Along with his mother, Paul moves to a new town where he continues his Pointdexter studies and falls in love with his sweet neighbor girl (the yummy Kristy Swanson). The girl is terrorized and eventually killed by her monstrous father, a crazy old woman blows B.B to pieces and Paul snaps. He steals her corpse from the hospital and implants her with B.B's artificial brain. Right from the start, this goes wrong as Kristy avenges her death (and how!). Although the undertone of Deadly Friend is downright comic, there are quite a lot gruesome moments and bloody sequences. The plot is highly unoriginal (actually, some sort of lame Frankenstein-variant), the characters are far from believable and the entire production is perfect to claim Wes Craven is an overrated director. Below average, silly film but with – it has to be said – one of the coolest killings ever! The basketball-decapitation alone is worth at least one viewing of this film.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Deadly Friend should probably be good for fans of cult horror films, and this is nothing like some of Wes Craven's past and present films such as "Nightmare on Elm Street" or "Scream", but it does have a good combination of both the horror classics "Frankenstein" and "Bride of Frankenstein". However, the script is rather weak and seemed poorly adapted from Diana Henstall's more effect short novel "Friend". Deadly Friend does have some good scares and above all gore and a good solid cast from teen stars Matthew Laborteaux, Michael Sharrett and a young beautiful Kristy Swanson in the title role. Both Russ Marin and Anne Twomey provide a warm feeling to the younger cast and the audiences, while Richard Marcus and Anne Ramsey both, as usual, looking wickedly evil in their roles. Above all, Ramsey's classic decapitation by basketball scene is the highlight of the film. One year before she was seen in Steven Spielberg's "The Goonies", and a year after this she got an Oscar nomination for "Throw Momma from the Train", before dying in 1988. I whould say Deadly Friend gets 8/10, for a classic cult horror favorite.
  • DEADLY FRIEND is written by Bruce Joel Rubin who has also written films like Deep Impact (Mimi Leder, 1998) and Ghost (Jerry Zucker, 1990). DEADLY FRIEND is directed by Wes Craven, the horror maestro behind films like A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984), The Serpent and the Rainbow (1988) and the 90's boxoffice hit Scream (1996). Craven has done many mediocre or even bad films and especially in the 1980's. Fortunately DEADLY FRIEND isn't among the worst ones.

    The film stars Matthew Laborteaux as teenager Paul, who moves to a new town with his mother. Paul has a self made artificial intelligence robot called BB and he spends a lot of time with BB and even talks about its structure and other elements in the school for students. Soon he meets the neighbor Samantha played by Kristy Swanson. Samantha is abused by his father and BB is abused by their angry old lady neighbor who indeed looks like a nightmare on your street. Soon something happens to BB and something happens to Samantha and what our teen genius develops is something we've seen at least in Frank Henenlotter's trash classic Frankenhooker (1990) among many other more or less serious "Frankenstein themed" horror films.

    DEADLY FRIEND is little like Craven's other late 80's film, Shocker (1989). Both films try to be teen drama, horror and comedy at the same time, and it is of course pretty difficult to achieve a totally satisfying result with so many ingredients. DEADLY FRIEND is surprisingly restrained and drama oriented and Samantha really becomes pretty sympathetic girl and the two central boys as well. They're not over-the-top smiling and beautiful adolescents one can find from any of those disgusting Hollywood produced teen horrors/slashers that spawned after the success of Scream. In DEADLY FRIEND, the teenagers are pretty natural and realistic and so they're easy to feel sympathy for.

    Craven has the talent to keep his tongue in cheek while directing these films (just remember the outrageous finale in Shocker!) and that helps a lot. He doesn't take himself too seriously and if he does, it happens very rarely. DEADLY FRIEND makes me smile a lot, but it's all intentional and I don't smile because I feel ashamed or sorry for the makers, which is the case when a film really takes itself too seriously and becomes laughable. The outrageousness in DEADLY FRIEND is taken as far as possible in a Warner production like this when the infamous and often heard among horror fans "basketball murder" comes and I must say it feels quite gruesome in an otherwise "lame" and harmless film like this. The gore in that brief but memorable scene is close to that of Tom Savini's in films like Maniac (William Lustig, 1980) and The Prowler aka Rosemary's Killer (Joseph Zito, 1982). I kind of doubt would this film get an R rating nowadays.

    The main problem in DEADLY FRIEND is that it is too straightforward and has huge holes and easy solutions in its plot and screenplay. When writer Rubin decides they're going to do something, it just happens and there are no problems at all, as if they were completely alone in the city, the hospital and so on. Also the Samantha's father is totally unnecessary as a character. He is there completely in vain, and the violence he commits towards his daughter without any motive or explanation feels quite tasteless and unnecessary in a film like this. Samantha's fate could have been arranged without the character of her father and definitely ten times more satisfyingly and with a more noteworthy result and final film.

    The "shock epilogue" we could expect from Craven is this time very effective and really has to be seen to be believed. It is as shocking and surprising as the ending in Elm Street, but I would say it is even more gruesome and even surreal this time. The effects required for that ending are handled fine as well as throughout the whole film. The BB robot is quite nice and never irritating. The result which comes after Paul's operation on BB and Samantha is very close to that of Henenlotter's Frankenhooker and they both are equally demented!

    DEADLY FRIEND isn't as great and noteworthy horror comedy as it very well could have been in the hands of this director, but still I prefer this over Shocker, for instance, but this is far away from the masterpieces (Elm Street, Serpent etc.) of the director. I give DEADLY FRIEND 4/10 and will watch out those basketballs for sure.
  • Cheesy cool movie that I must say was a surprise. Has one of the coolest kills in horror. Funny at times too.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Paul Conway is an intelligent 15-year-old teen that has moved into a new town with his mother and artificial creation called BB, to study and teach at the local university. Although after settling in, tragedy hits hard when during a Halloween prank his paranoid neighbour across the street shoots BB to pieces and his good friend / neighbour Samantha falls victim to her father's alcoholic rage, which leaves her in a coma. Deciding there's nothing they can do they decide to turn off the life support, but Paul plans to steal her body and place BeeBee's computer chip in her brain. Sure thing it worked, but she isn't who she uses to be.

    Oh Wes, what were you thinking? Now, what to make of it. Yep, it's feebly dumb, but slightly diverting with a few memorable scenes and not much else. Well, I guess I would be lying if I didn't add Kristy Swanson to being one of the draw cards. Her robotic turn where she's brought back to life was facetiously done.

    Taken from the novel "Friend" by Diana Henstall, this starts off like a "Short Circuit" rip-off than transforms into a modern day Frankenstein retelling. Craven really overplays his hand in over-plotting the film with elements of a family drama with moralistic babble, which then suddenly skyrockets into cheesy daftness and steers it into horror territory with mostly minor results. The simple story feels sparse with many redundant avenues that dig many more holes in the unbelievable developments and flawed material. Circulating through the flick is an easy-going sense of humour that fits in naturally well. It never really takes itself far too seriously, and oh the infamous basketball decapitation is a real scene-stealer and purely a riot. What else is a scene-stealer has got to be the film's enticing gimmick, BB the robot. Although, at times I didn't know what the heck it was mumbling about, but it was a likable inclusion nonetheless. You should listen to the catchy (or maybe drawn out) tune that plays over the credits for a chuckle.

    Mechanically dicey direction by Craven lends the film to have quite a languid pace and junky set pieces with wilted suspense. Despite some effectively unpleasant jolts and the use of splatter, it just feels like they have thrown a spanner the mix in hoping it would take off. Instead it's pretty much a hasty and fumbled attempt. This goes for the daftly incompetent climax, which leads to a hopelessly idiotic (if unpredictable) conclusion. The soaring music score in the film strangely has energy and roughly tugs on the emotional chords. The performances were handled in a tolerable manner. The young cast; Kristy Swanson, Matthew Laborteaux and Michael Sharrett are sound in their roles and never let the overall silliness affect their performances. Anne Twomey was pleasantly engaging as Paul's mother and Anne Ramsey is superb as the stingy neighbour, Elvira.

    This was a lean period for Craven and it shows up here in this pretty middling offbeat failure. Not his worst, but it's not too far from the bottom. But better was to come with the voodoo horror piece, "The Serpent and the Rainbow".
  • Deadly Friend, a Frankenstein inspired tale in which dead teenager Samantha (Kristy Swanson) is brought back to life by the insertion of an artificial intelligence microchip into her brain, must be one of the dumbest movies in Wes Craven's erratic career, but to be fair, it might not be ALL his fault: studio intervention apparently altered Craven's original vision—a twisted love story between Sam and the genius boy next door—by forcing the director to add in extra scenes of gore and pointless dream sequences.

    The result is a real howler, a film that features a cute Johnny 5 style robot that makes stupid noises, includes one of the most ridiculous horror movie deaths ever (a super-splattery decapitation by basketball), suffers from a truly awful performance from attractive young star Swanson, and closes with the silliest shock ending since…well, since Wes Craven's A Nightmare On Elm Street, actually. The funny thing is that it all proves reasonably entertaining—albeit for all the wrong reasons.

    5.5 out of 10, rounded up to 6 for IMDb.
  • I have not seen this one in quite some time, but it is about a new kid in town and his pet robot. A robot designed to grab people by the crotch and squeeze. Already, you see the flaws; he apparently designed this robot to have a bit of a violent streak in him. Young new boy makes a new friend a girl who has an abusive father. You can see where this is going. The old lady from "The Goonies" and "Throw Momma from the Train" blows the heck out of the robot and the girl is killed by her abusive father. Young boy somehow deduces that if you put the robot's computer chip in the young girl she will come back and she does. Unfortunately, she now seemingly has the robot's personality and that isn't too good. All the deaths you see coming, though the one with the basketball is rather good, in fact the highlight of this overly predictable movie. The only thing that is not predictable is the end which makes no sense. Well you know what happens, I am just saying by that time the kid should have left well enough alone. It is also a rather impossible phenomenon, but hey it is a horror movie.
  • A few people have said that it's an undiscovered treasure, more people have stated that it's possibly Wes Craven's worst movie (haven't they seen "Shocker"?); I simply found it to be an OK, average horror offering that merely helps you kill two hours. The first half plays almost like a well-observed drama, but after Swanson has been "resurrected" the film becomes just too silly to work. The "infamous" basketball scene, however, is undeniably great; you'll have to rewind the tape multiple times to get the full effect of it! (**1/2)
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I had seen this when I was a pretty undiscriminating kid on TV a couple of times. I remember thinking it was just so-so. Seeing it now, I can't get over how horribly misconceived it is, from its cheesy "grabber" of an opening, its lame title, and its completely nonsensical surprise ending. The film stars Matthew Laborteaux as a young teen who moves into a new neighborhood with his mom and robot friend and meets the young Kristy Swanson, a pretty girl who lives with her physically abusive father. The opening scenes of this are a mess-mostly it seems as though we are asked to laugh along with the antics of the unbearably cute robot, then he'll do something menacing, and then it's back to more goofball "humorous" scenes. Then the robot is "killed" and coincidentally so is Swanson. Matthew puts a microchip from the robot in Swanson's head and voila! she's alive again, but now moving like a robot and in a murderous, vengeful state of mind. The only real reason to see this is the first (and presumably only) decapitation-by-basketball scene in cinema history. I also have to admit to being slightly touched by the (admittedly silly) theme of Swanson regaining her humanity gradually, but this is eventually completely jettisoned for the awesomely ludicrous "shock" ending.
  • I had heard very mixed things about Deadly Friend so I was a little worried but I think this film is a little misunderstood. Much like Shocker(1989), this film gets a bad rep and I don't get it. We all know that Wes Craven is very hit or miss but I think is one of his hits. At least he's trying something different.

    The acting is mediocre but I really like the story as a modern day Frankenstein. The direction and scares, I thought, were fantastic and the basketball scene was awesome.

    I challenge all you horror fans to give Deadly Friend a chance. You might just find that you've made a good decision.
  • Scarecrow-8817 March 2010
    Warning: Spoilers
    It sure has been a while since I last watched Wes Craven's "Deadly Friend", but I had forgotten just how much fun it was. The plot is so absurd and has murder sequences so surreal, I was completely won over. A bright teenager who can create artificially intelligent robots and understands complex matters concerning the human brain, responds to a crisis rather extraordinarily..his girlfriend is killed by her lousy, cruel, drunk of a father(..he knocks her down the stairs causing a head trauma/cerebral hemorrhage)and the kid, Paul(Matthew Laborteaux)resurrects the girl, Samantha(Kristy Swanson)by implanting his robot's computer chip intelligence in her brain! This Frankensteinian maneuver unleashes a cavalcade of problems he attempts to juggle with little success.

    First, Paul's friend, newspaper boy Tom(Michael Sharrett), who helped him kidnap Sam's body from the hospital, is having a hard time accepting what they had done. Second, the computer chip that Paul inserted in Sam's brain, is controlling her..this is a major setback because robot BB was starting to evolve into an entity which made it's own decisions without his master's approval, and it seems Sam is following orders directed by BB. Third, certain targets are being systematically murdered such as a paranoid neighbor who doesn't like people, Elvira Parker(Anne Ramsey; Throw Mama from the Train/The Goonies), always pointing her double-barrel shotgun at folks, who was responsible for destroying BB and Harry Pringle(Richard Marcus), the louse who sent his daughter crashing down the stairs to her demise. Fourth, Paul is having a difficult time keeping Sam stashed away, and getting her to follow instructions is not an easy task. With Tom about to crack, his mom(Anne Tworney) always close to discovering Sam, and a body count, Paul's life spirals out of control and it will only be a matter of time before the secret's out.

    I like how Craven creates what looks like a television movie, only for the outbursts of violence to shock the viewer into silence such as the celebrated head explosion gag by the use of a basketball(..this is followed by a body hopping about without the head as blood squirts out)..how Samantha is all of a sudden equipped with superhuman strength, allowed to lift a grown man in the air after snapping his wrist back, crushing his throat while having him extended high off the ground. Or, when Samantha lifts a biker bully, picking on Paul, over her head, hurling him into a cop car's windshield. Craven includes an amusing nightmare sequence many might consider a homage to "A Nightmare on Elm Street" where Paul finds someone slithering underneath his bed sheets, only to find the charred visage of a victim whose head had been eviscerated in an incinerator. We also spend time with Paul's cute robot before it's blown to smithereens by mean old hag Elvira, and it's established here that it's got some malevolence in it's evolving programming(..right at the start, BB nearly chokes the life out of a thief planning to lift money from Paul's mother's purse), how it could cause harm if needed. The plot itself is laughable, no doubt, and it's hard not to giggle at the ending where Paul hasn't learned his lesson, reaping unpleasantly for his interference in the process of life and death, having created a monster he will not be able to contain.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    After the commercially successful Nightmare on Elm Street, Horror "auteur" Wes Craven decided he would attempt a more romantic drama combined with sci-fi elements. Much to his chagrin, after test screenings, fans of his earlier blood-fests demanded that the film be re-cut and all the gore they were used to in a Wes Craven film be re-introduced.

    The protagonist is boy genius Paul Conway (Matthew Laborteaux) who has just arrived in town with him mom Jeannie (Ann Twomey). He becomes friends with a newspaper delivery boy Tom Toomey (Michael Sharrett) and falls for his next door neighbor Samantha Pringle aka Sam (Kristy Swanson) who is subject to constant abuse from her alcoholic father Harry (Richard Marcus).

    The first third of the film focuses on Paul's pet robot BB (voiced by Charles Fleischer), a contraption that cost the studio approximately $20,000 to create. BB protects Paul by getting into a confrontation with a teenage bully who rides a motorcycle along with his thuggish pals.

    BB is eventually destroyed at the hands of a reclusive old woman by the name of Elvira Parker who dispatches the robot from her front porch with a shotgun.

    The main plot focuses on Kristy who is thrown down the stairs by her father and sustains a severe head injury in which she ends up on life support. This is where the film devolves into what one might term complete stupidity. Paul, using his computer skills and rudimentary knowledge of brain surgery, plants a microchip in Sam's brain. She miraculously wakes up but is nothing more than a home grown zombie.

    Cheap thrills abound in the last third of the film where zombie Sam dispatches all the baddies including her father, the motorcycle kid and mean-spirited Elvira. Even Paul is subject to his ex-girlfriend's wrath-he too ends up strangled at the hands of Sam. There is a twist at the very end which makes no sense: somehow Sam's face and skin peel away revealing half-robotic arms and a skull-like visage coupled with BB's voice.

    Shame on all the bloodthirsty adolescents who clamored for the studio to change Mr. Craven's original version. We're left with a film that rightly bombed at the box office but shamefully ended up as a cult classic chiefly among misguided adolescents addicted to such unmitigated blood-fests.
  • "Deadly Friend" is one of those horror films that came and went without a trace; but for a die hard horror fanatic like myself, it certainly had it's share of scares, humor, and yes, a surprising human touch.

    Matthew Laborteaux (a "Little House on the Prairie" alum) plays Paul; an egghead teen with a robot pal named BB. In the course of the plot, he meets Samantha or "Sam" (Kristy Swanson), an abused, lonely girl who catches the eye of young Paul. Needlessly killed, by her drunk father, Paul vows to make wrongs right, by implanting BB's superchip into Sam's brain....and that my friends, is where the fun (or nightmares) begin.

    Sam is confused about her new identity, and is naturally seen as a freak. She proceeds to take it out on the locals (including Anne Ramsey, of "Goonies" fame, with above all things; a basketball!!), who want this abomination to cease from existing. Wes Craven didn't quite score with this outing, even after the phenomenal success of "A Nightmare on Elm Street", but even a flop has it's own merits. Find this little gem, and be sure the lights aren't off!!

    Grade: C+
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The plot concept for this film is a really good one. Paul's friend Sam has just died tragically. Her brain is dead, and Paul is left behind with a crazy idea on his mind.

    Paul: What if I just use a computer chip as a pacemaker for her brain?

    Paul, being a wiz with computers and studying to become a doctor, puts the twisted plan into motion and steals Sam's body from the hospital and then implants a chip that is meant to act like a connector from her brain to her spinal cord. The plan actually works and Sam is brought back from the dead, and then the real problems start.

    Now, this may seem like a cheesy plot idea to some, but to me it sounds like an inventive remake of Frankenstein. The idea of this dead girl walking around and Paul trying to keep it all under control is a good one and could of made for a sweet, interesting little film, but the idea was destroyed by BB! What is BB? BB is the little robot that Paul got the computer chip from. BB was an annoying character before Paul slapped his microchip into Sam's head. It just rolled around screaming out BB, which gets really annoying very quickly, and it was ridicules how strong BB was. Like they really made him over the top and he comes off as a cartoon character.

    But, even after BB is out of the picture he still wrecks the film. Instead of Sam having her own mind when she comes back from the dead, she now has BB's mind. Going with the mythosis that the film has created this makes no sense at all. The chip that was stuck inside Sam wasn't really BB's mind. It was the electric wire that tied up his mind so he could function. It should have acted the same way inside of her head. Why she suddenly starts moving around and acting like BB I will never know. It just doesn't fit. On top of that she suddenly has supper human strength without any explanation. This is a film that can't fallow its own rules and to top off the BB stupidity a jazzed up song all about BB is played at the end causing you to want to cover your ears to block out the beat.

    This film was made by the one and only Wes Craven. The man that created Freddy Kruger, the Scream series, and an odd little cheesy gem known as Cursed. Granted, some don't like Cursed, but it was cheesy and fun, this however is not. Wes tries very hard at times to recreate A Nightmare On Elm Street with this film. There is even a dream scene with a burned up man jumping out of a bed. But, Wes comes up short. For such an intelligent plot concept the film is to b-movie for its own good. From the cartoonish BB to a killer basketball, it all just gets on your nerves. Hey, even the name of the film is lame. I should have seen this one coming.

    As we all know it's remake time and anything and everything is being redone. This is one of the few films that I think should be remade. It could have been so much better.

    5 out of 10: It had a lot of potential.
  • I consume everything that has the words slashers from the 80's so I decide do to finally give a chance to "Deadly Friend". Well, I think about it as Craven's high school horror flick with a slasher vibe and cheesy elements.

    The whole B.B. sub-plot kinda got onto my nerves but hey, I accept the 80's cheesiness. When things get ugly for B.B. (shotgun thing), I really liked how the sweet, super tender and sexy Kristy Swanson came on board as the main villain.

    The movie follows the typical over the top slasher formula that deals with inventive death scenes (much in the likes of "A Nightmare On Elm Street") and a graveyard love story.

    Still, the movie lacked of a dark tone or any mystery. This should be considered as a "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" horror flick for teens.

    Kristy Swanson is absolutely adorable, sexy, tender. The perfect girlfriend to take home and introducer her to your parents.

    The most brilliant moment comes with the infamous basketball death. Nice! A must see for a PG-13 audience and for any lovers for the 80's slasher craziness.
  • pseudo-327 October 1998
    The horror movie with a conscience. Whatever. Intelligent boy finds his beautiful next-door neighbor dead, and in order to keep her alive, he plants a robot-chip in her brain... OK. Not one of my favorites (even though it's directed by Wes Craven, and stars Kristy Swanson), but any movie that manages to incorporate a basketball into a death scene, has to have something going for it.
  • gavin694214 September 2015
    Paul is a new kid in town with a robot named "BB". He befriends Samantha (Kristy Swanson) and the three of them have a lot of good times together. That is, until Samantha's abusive father throws her down some stairs and kills her.

    Whether you like this movie or not really comes down to how seriously you take it. Kristy Swanson walking and swinging her arms like a robot? Pretty silly. The acting is rather spotty at times. Some of the science and plot do not really add up. Calling this a "B" movie might be giving it too much credit.

    There is a lot of dispute about what aspects were Craven, what came from the studio and what was from different producers. Craven did not want the movie to be as dark or gory as it became. Respectfully, I would have to disagree with Craven on that. The gore effects (especially the burned father) look incredible, and by far the highlight of the film is the death of the neighbor woman (death by basketball!).

    This is a fun picture that seems to have been largely forgotten. Of course it is does not reach the status of "Last House", "Nightmare" or "Scream", but there is a lot to like about this one.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Wes Craven disowned "Deadly Friend", and in some ways it is like a child nobody wanted: it's dull, listless, uninspired and uninspiring, but can occasionally be quite nasty. It's also hard to follow, and hard to bear with.

    The main character is a teenage genius who has an irritating robot following him around called BB. BB constantly mutters unintelligibly like a resentful Jawa. We are introduced to him when he grabs a would-be thief by the throat and almost kills him.

    So I guess we're supposed to be scared of BB. I wasn't scared at all. Not only does he not look scary, he doesn't even look capable of harming anyone. "Deadly Friend" came out in the decade that gave us "Terminator" and "Robocop", so evidently they knew how to make robots look scary. The producers allegedly spent $20,000 on this robot. Why didn't they make it scarier?

    If the movie had just been about this robot gradually going evil, it would have been ridiculous but it might have at least been entertaining.

    Instead, the movie adds a totally ill-advised plot twist where a character dies, and the genius protagonist takes the chip from BB's brain and inserts it into the character's, reviving her.

    Let's not waste time pondering how a square piece of plastic jammed into a person's brain matter can do anything other than cause a subdural haemorrhage. You might not be surprised to find, given the logic of stupid movies we've all seen, that this causes the person to be revived... with BB's aggressive personality.

    It's rare that I lose engagement with a movie due to how stupid the plot is. Generally screenwriters and actors are skilled enough to cover up ridiculous plot points. Here, they were not, perhaps due to the interference from the studio that caused Craven to disown his film.

    The actress who plays the girl, Kristy Swanson, is a skilled actress and you kind of feel bad for her, because no performer on the planet could have made much of such a ridiculous role.

    I think all "Deadly Friend" must be remembered for, aside from its ridiculous premise perhaps, is the scene in which Anne Ramsey (the only actress I remembered, and who could forget that face) has her head exploded when the girl-with-the-robot-brain (and robot-strength, apparently) throws a basketball at her so hard that it decimates her skull. That's what I meant about the shocking bit: it's gory enough to give the famous scene from "Scanners" a run for its money, and it seems to come out of nowhere and you don't know what to make of it because it's so bizarrely stupid.

    The same can be said for the whole movie.
  • I'm guessing 90% anyone who is between the ages of 42-60 has seen this movie at least once. I'm on the lower end of that scale & when I was younger, it seemed like this movie & "the Boy Who Could Fly" was always on random weekends when I real movies would actually always play on the major networks. I don't think basketball off noggin is a spoiler. Hadnt seen either movie in decades. Actually saw this one prob 10 yrs & just finally saw it again. It's crazy that with so many movies, sometimes I struggle to find something new that interests me & so I find myself every 3-10 yrs rewatching movies I haven't seen in awhile. Sometimes it's like watching a movie for first time cuz you forget most of movie. Other times, u remember almost everything but sometimes see something you never noticed somehow.

    Anyways, this is a solid movie. I don't think it's anything great but it's def solid. It so doesn't suck & im shocked any1 would give it a trash rating. I mean it was it. It's pretty simple story, but it works. It's better as a kid/teen imo but doesn't mean an adult can't enjoy it. Have to be interested in these kind of movies tho. I remember being really creeped out as a kid. Not as creeped as I was when I saw the Stepford Wives as A kid for first time back in late 80s but a little creeped out nonetheless. Now seeing it, it's not as creepy, but it's still good movie & if you like the stepford wives or have an acquired taste for 1980's movies & also movies in the horror & sci-fi genre. This is def 1 of the better movies of the 80s in that cat. When I say 1 of the better, it's a long list. Since imo it's the best time for those genres. However you have seemingly countless mixed in ova that period that are god awful & seemed like someone picked up a camcorder & gathered folks up round the neighborhood & they just winged it. This is Craven tho, and it has real actors, a good story & is well put together. Just don't watch it if you don't like horror or sci-fi'ish movies. Seems like that'd be obvious but we all know people who hand out 1s on movies we know don't deserve them & its clear to us that they just hate the genre of particular movie or are just weirdos.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Somewhere along the way, the idea that Wes Craven was a genius became accepted fact. While I enjoy A Nightmare On Elm Street and The Hills Have Eyes just fine, so many of his films fall apart and feel wildly uneven.

    Case in point: 1986's Deadly Friend.

    The film was intended to be a science fiction film, based on the novel Friend by Diana Henstell. After Craven's original cut was shown to a test audience, the audience felt let down that there weren't any nightmare scenes or gore shocks. So the studio imposed reshoots and a new edit, ending in a film that veers from the wacky comedy hijinks of a robotic best friend with an old woman's head being exploded with a basketball. Nearly any plot development was lost and we're left with a main character who feels like an utter creep. A second set of test audiences hated the graphic violence and gore. You just can't win.

    That said - Wes Craven's output is often marked by explanations of studio interference and bad test screenings and screwed up budgets. I understand that Hollywood is rough and the ghetto of horror movies - which he yearned to escape - doesn't matter all that much to the bean counters. But seriously - there are more excuses than successes in the oeuvre of Craven.

    Teenage science genius Paul Conway (Matthew Laborteaux, Little House on the Prairie star and former U.S. Pac-Man champion) and his single mom have just moved to town. Paul's got one friend so far, newspaper boy Tom Toomey (Michael Sharrett, Theodore Rex and Savage Dawn). In one of their first conversations, they discuss withdrawn next door neighbor Samantha Pringle (Kristy Swanson, the future Buffy the Vampire Slayer), but mainly discuss her breasts. Yes, the boys of 1986 didn't even hide what sexist jerks they were.

    Samantha and Paul get close when she's not being beaten into oblivion by her dad Harry (Richard Marcus, who played Dr. William Raines on the TV series The Pretender). But there's a silver lining - they all have a robotic friend named B.B. that Paul built when he isn't taking over the college classes he's attending early or doing autopsies. And oh yeah - B.B. is voiced by Charles Fleischer, whose sub-Robin Williams mania only really worked in Who Framed Roger Rabbit? Here, his voicing of B.B. will instantly remind you of Roger while grating on you with each successive second of screen time.

    Other than the abusive dad and a motorcycle gang, the kids' main enemy is the old lady who lives next door, Elvira Parker (Anne Ramsey from The Goonies and Throw Mama From the Train; it seems this was the role she did best, a harridan who makes people want to kill her). Instead of a tender Home Alone explanation of why she hates kids, she's a one-note villain: she steals basketballs and fires shotguns, including a harrowing scene (or joy-inducing if you're as annoyed by this robot as I was) where she murders B.B. with several blasts of hot lead.

    After a Thanksgiving night first kiss with Paul, Sam's dad gets so upset that he ends up shoving her down the steps to her death. She soon expires, leading Paul to go insane and try to bring her back to life with the chip he saved from B.B. This leaves us with Sam as a proto-goth robot zombie with superhuman strength.

    What follows is pretty much why this movie is well-known - you've probably seen the animated GIF of Elvira's head being splatted by a basketball - which is wall-to-wall mayhem. People get thrown through cop car windows, Sam dives from a second-story window and lands on her feet to no one's surprise at all and the end if laughably tacked on, trying to be an ersatz Carrie, with her face graphically splitting open to reveal the visage of B.B. before she kills Paul. Also - the requisite studio asked for dream sequences are here and ready to bleed all over your eyeballs.

    PS - that ending is also totally a studio conceit. Writer Bruce Joel Rubin told Fangoria, "That robot coming out of the girl's head belongs solely to Mark Canton, and you don't tell the president of Warner Brothers that his idea stinks!"

    Seriously - executive vice president of Warner Brothers Mark Canton went mathematic on this film - demanding additional gore scenes be added to the film, each progressing in visceral excess. For his part, Craven would distance himself from the film, feeling that his vision had been compromised. Dude - you were making a movie about a girl being turned into a robot. He dreamed of crossing over like John Carpenter did with Starman. At the risk of being a jerk, I'll just say what I'm feeling: Wes Craven was no John Carpenter.

    Maybe I should be a little nicer. After all, Craven was dealing with anywhere from eight to twenty different producers on this film, as well as a divorce and being pulled from Beetlejuice and Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. Wow - I would actually love to see what Craven would have done with that one! He was also in the midst of a plagarism lawsuit, as someone claimed that he had stolen the idea for A Nightmare On Elm Street from them. Craven claimed that he worked on Deadly Friend because his agent said to him, "You should do a studio film, because otherwise you'll be stuck doing small films for the rest of your life."

    As for Rubin, he'd deal with similar studio interference on a later project, Jacob's Ladder. Ah, Hollywood.
  • Paul Conway (Matthew Labyorteaux) and his mother Jeannie Conway (Anne Twomey) travel to a new town where Paul will join the local university invited by Dr. Johanson (Russ Marin). They bring the robot BB that was developed by Paul, who is a genius in robotic. Paul befriends the paperboy Tom Toomey (Michael Sharrett) and has a crush on his next door neighbor Samantha Pringle (Kristy Swanson), whose abusive alcoholic father Harry Pringle (Richard Marcus) frequently hurts her. One day, Paul, Sam, Tom and BB are playing basketball and the ball fall in the field of their paranoid grumpy neighbor Elvira Parker (Anne Ramsey) that does not give it back to the teenagers. In Halloween, Tom convinces Paul to let BB open the padlock of the entrance to her house. However, there is an alarm system and Elvira blows up BB with her shotgun. Then Harry pushes her daughter down the stairs and the doctors let her brain-dead connected to the life support. However Paul convinces Tom to go to the hospital to rescue Sam and then he implants BB's chip into her brain resurrecting Samantha. But will she come back to life normal?

    "Deadly Friend" is an underrated cult movie from the 80's directed by Wes Craven in the beginning of his successful career. The story of friendship begins as a drama, with Samantha receiving bad treatment from he abusive father, and sci-fi with BB, maybe with one of the first artificial intelligence of the cinema. When Samantha becomes a zombie- robot, the plot becomes terror, but without gore, in the style of Franklenstein. Kristy Swanson is gorgeous and has a great chemistry with Matthew Labyorteaux. My vote is eight.

    Title (Brazil): "A Maldição de Samantha" ("The Samantha's Course")

    Note: On 28 Nov 2016, I saw this film again.
  • A boy genius specializing in brain research and robotics (Matthew Laborteaux) moves to the town of Welling with his mother (Anne Twomey) where he starts an apprenticeship at the university. He befriends a paper boy and romances an abused neighbor girl (Michael Sharrett and Kristy Swanson respectively). When tragedy strikes, he uses his talents to rectify the situation with horrifying results.

    "Deadly Friend" (1986) was Wes Craven's next theatrical project after the success of "A Nightmare on Elm Street" (1984). It was meant to be a sci-fi thriller focusing on a dark teenage love story, but the trailer omitted BB the robot and advertised the movie as another Wes Craven horror flick. The film bombed at the box office.

    You might remember Laborteaux as Albert, the adopted Ingalls boy on Little House on the Prairie. Meanwhile Winsome Kristy was only 16 during shooting. These two and BB the cute robot give the film a likable innocent quality. In tone, it's a cross between "Short Circuit" (1986) and "Silver Bullet" (1985) just with elements of the Frankenstein story thrown in.

    Speaking of which, this is a modern-day coming-of-age take on Frankenstein and zombie tales exploring the idea of a dead person being resurrected by unnatural means with unpleasant results. It raises questions concerning when physical death actually occurs. Interesting ideas, of course, but the execution is so-so and yet kind of agreeable, a puzzling mix.

    Craven is a hit-or-miss director IMHO. For instance, "Summer of Fear" (1978) is effective, but "The Serpent and the Rainbow" (1988) is mind-bogglingly bad. This one falls somewhere in between, but closer to the good.

    The film runs 1 hour, 31 minutes, and was shot in the Los Angeles area as follows: Burbank Studios (Paul Conway's house), USC (university exteriors & lecture hall interiors) and Monrovia, which is just northeast of L. A. (Samantha on the loose).

    GRADE: B-/C+
  • It was the worst movie i ever seen in my life . I think if anybody wants to see it it is a waste of time. They had bad acting and bad parts. so if you want a good movie i think you should not see this movie. I am so mad that i wasted my money on that movie
An error has occured. Please try again.