User Reviews (294)

Add a Review

  • Seasons 1 - 7: 9/10

    Seasons 8 - 9: 4/10

    The attempted reboot: 1/10

    The first handful of seasons of this show are truly classic television. This was probably the first show I ever watched that could be construed as a "Dramedy" show. Sure, there are laughs around every corner, but the Conner family is very obviously lower-class and we get a lot of realistic insight into their struggles. People who've been poor will relate to some of the storylines in this show A LOT.

    John Goodman and Laurie Metcalf are the true stars here, as is the case with a lot of sitcoms. Roseanne is the main character, yes; she's the rock, the glue, but she isn't the funniest or most interesting of the bunch. Without her, though, it wouldn't be the same (the reboot makes this painfully obvious, but any seasoned viewer of television can tell you with from the start).

    I wish there were shows like this around today. There are still a lot of poor folks out there struggling to get by, and today's television shows aren't providing the same kind of relatable escapism that Roseanne did.
  • cleo-4537622 February 2020
    Having watched all seasons aired in the UK the first time round, this show became like having a surrogate family on tv. The characters are well rounded, some relatable, all entertaining. Like many sitcoms, it got a bit weird towards the end, as all shows are victim to the 'we're losing ratings so let's shake things up to get 'em back' ethos of panicking writers which eventually killed it. The first 8 seasons are well worth revisiting if you're able. I hope this gets picked up by a streaming service so it can be enjoyed fully once more.
  • I've been a fan of this show since it premiered in the last 1980's. I used to watch it with my aunt every week and we looked forward to the laughs. I didn't always understand what was going on but Roseanne and Dan always made me laugh.

    Now that I'm old I still watch the re-runs on TV Land and CMT and it still makes me laugh just as much. I think what I always loved about the show is how it mimicked real life. Not everyone lives in a beautiful home with an unlimited cash flow and the Conners were just like the rest of us - living paycheck to paycheck and trying to find a way not to get the lights shut off. The show did a great job with serious and social topics through the years, I just wish at times they didn't focus so much on women's lib and making men out to be useless and dumb.

    The first few seasons are the very best because Roseanne, in real life, did not become a diva yet but the middle seasons are very good too. The majority of season 8 and all of season 9 are just train wrecks. The series really should have ended with season 7 because the final 2 seasons just because so outlandish and weird that it was clear Roseanne was just doing these things because she could. Her real life craziness was now taking over the show.

    If you've never watched the show before I highly recommend it, but maybe just skip seasons 8 and 9 so it does not leave you with a bad taste in your mouth.
  • A terrifically intense dramedy which features possibly the most realistic familial unit in TV sitcoms, not to mention a marriage between Roseanne and Dan Connor (Roseanne Barr and John Goodman) which is pin-point exact, warm and right--and feels lived in. All non-believers have to do is watch a few episodes: the timing is deceptively shaggy yet perfect, the characters believable, their predicaments immediate. Fully realized by Roseanne herself, who never let her real-life chronicles get in the way of the show. The writing is continually sharp, with dialogue that frequently evokes whole lives, such as in the episode where Roseanne sits in a coffee house after hours talking to a tired waitress who confides about her late husband, "I miss him. It's so quiet. Sometimes I'll turn a football game on, turn it up real loud...and I hate sports. But what'ya gonna do?" Tender moments like this, seemingly throwaway bits, elude some viewers looking for a fast laughter fix; "Roseanne" was always something more, and it aches in laughter and in life's woes.
  • preppy-321 December 2003
    "Roseanne" is a milestone in TV sitcoms. It shows a lower class family realistically and the problems and issues they face. It dealt with (for the time) risky issues that you didn't see on TV often. I still remember quite a stir when two separate episodes dealt with one of the girls "becoming" a woman and the son of the family discovering how to "pleasure" himself. Also it had episodes dealing with abortion, gay characters, alcoholism, drug abuse, premarital sex, workplace and sexual harassment, how to deal with elderly parents... None of the characters were squeaky clean or perfect...they all had huge flaws and faults. But all of this was done with realism, great acting and a strong (if sometimes caustic) sense of humor. You saw the characters grow and change over the course of the 9 years it was on the air. It totally fell apart during the last season (egos were going out of control on the set) and ended horribly but the previous eight seasons were just fantastic. And the Halloween episodes were among the funniest ever done for a TV series. Just great all around. If you've never seen it, catch an episode or two--it's worth the effort.
  • I grew up watching, and loving this show. First, the positives. The show has the same feel as the original iteration. I love the raw emotion, and witty exchanges. I enjoy that the majority of the cast returned, and I feel like they picked up seemlessly. The negatives... I hate that abc is allowing the political garbage to once again interfere. Now, this is nothing new for this show, but it is completely unnecessary and feels forced. Overall, I truly loved this show, and will try to give it a fair shot, but I hope the political crap falls off.
  • gnaqgxy27 February 2021
    Roseanne reminds me of simpler times. I miss her. I'm sorry things didn't work out with her and the reboot. I didn't approve of the Tweet (and I do believe her remorse was sincere), but I also stopped watching the show when they kicked her off.
  • I wrote a review of the Roseanne revival and then realized it's all clumped together on IMDB, so I'm adding a note that I loved the original series except towards the end (that last season was horrific).

    My review of the revival:

    The reboot of Roseanne put some liberals in a quandary, because they thought the series was funny but didn't want to watch a show helmed by a rabid conspiracy theorist who believes lizard men rule the world.

    So as a liberal I was relieved when I watched the first episode of the reboot and though, meh.

    As with the original series, Roseanne, who can't act and isn't all that funny, is supported by a talented cast to make up for her deficiencies. Unfortunately, only Goodman manages to capture what made the original series so good; everything he says is funny or thought-provoking, but even other hugely talented people like Laurie Metcalf and Sara Gilbert don't seem to be able to recapture their characters. Perhaps they're just out of practice.

    The writing is weak. The back and forth between Jackie and Roseanne is shrill and uncomfortable but not actually funny.

    Roseanne has a very old-school, which tends to put me off a series nowadays. The only really retro old-school series I watch is One Day at a Time, which is much funnier, and even then I don't care for it as much as modern sitcoms like Kimmie Schmidt and Corporate.

    The new Roseanne isn't as bad as the final years of the old Roseanne, but it's not nearly good enough for me to bother with.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Season 1 - You can see Roseanne and the cast struggle in the first few episodes trying to get accustomed to ensemble comedy versus her stand-up routine, however the show improves very rapidly and has some great individual episodes.

    Season 2 - This marks the first of the very best seasons of the series, with the acting and writing in all episodes being top-notch. A big theme in this year's show is Roseanne trying to find stable employment after she walked off of her factory job at the conclusion of season one. I especially like how this season handled the real-life issue of what happens to a person like Roseanne who has only a high school education when she loses a factory job that does not provide any experience in doing anything that another employer would find valuable.

    Season 3 - Season three of Roseanne doesn't revolve around any particular overriding story arc, but the kids are definitely beginning to grow up. The late Glenn Quinn first appears as rebel and smart-mouth Mark Healey in "Becky, Beds, and Boys". I liked how Mark was portrayed in these early seasons when he was "Rebel Without a Cause" as opposed to the last three seasons when he was transformed into "Rebel Without a Clue".

    Season 4 - Season Four of Roseanne has some of the best individual episodes as well as the best overall storyline of any of the show's nine seasons. The season opens with the Conners having opened their motorcycle shop on their own after irresponsible friend Ziggy ran out on them at the last minute last season. This season probably does the best job of combining great comedy, hard-hitting drama, and highlighting situations that should look familiar to any member of the middle class. Although this is not the last of the good seasons of Roseanne, I would say season four is the last of the golden years of that series, and definitely worth viewing.

    Season 5 - The season starts out on a very morose note that corresponds to the deep recession the country was suffering when these shows aired in 1992. Dan's motorcycle shop is failing and will have to be closed in order for him to salvage the mortgage on the Conner home. Rodbell's, the diner in the mall where Roseanne has worked for two years, is closing too, due to business in the mall being so bad. Becky elopes with boyfriend Mark and moves to Minnesota, since with the closing of Dan's shop, Mark is unemployed too, plus Becky's college fund has been depleted to pay household bills. This opens up a crevice in Becky and Dan's relationship that takes months to heal. I compliment the show for incorporating the very bad recession going on in 1992 into the storyline. However, the Conners' troubles came on very suddenly and were resolved with a very pat answer.

    Season 6 - Although this season has some excellent episodes, and overall is a five star season, we begin to see the start of some of the trends that eventually becomes the downfall of the series. It seems that this is the beginning of a trend in "Roseanne" where men tend to be disposable. Jackie becomes pregnant by one of Dan's coworkers - "Fred" - who is never even given the courtesy of a last name, and Mark, previously depicted as an independent-minded and able mechanic is now portrayed as someone who can't even make passing grades in trade school.

    Season 7 - Season 7 still has enough good episodes and even some great ones for it to be worthwhile viewing, but it is definitely the beginning of the end. Roseanne begins one of the longest pregnancies in the history of television this season - thirteen months plus the time Roseanne has been pregnant before she announces the news. The whole issue of the broken romance between David and Darlene and its resolution is one of the best parts of the season. One of the worst parts of the season is the Thanksgiving episode when Roseanne's pregnancy looks like it might be in trouble. She screeches at both DJ and Dan every time they offer an opinion as if they are trying to tell her what to do instead of the possibility that they just want to comfort her and lighten the load. Jackie tires of Fred, whom she married less than a year before, and promptly disposes of him. After a few obligatory appearances in Season 8 he disappears entirely as though he had never existed in the first place.

    Season 8 - This season you have to really pick through episodes full of fantasy, inane slapstick, and politically correct undertones to get to the truly good blue collar slice-of-life episodes that made up the majority of episodes in prior years. The biggest problem with season eight is that Roseanne never did fantasy episodes well during any season, and this season is full of them. It was particularly sad to see what became of the Halloween episode this year, always a Roseanne staple. Gone are the outrageous costumes and the clever pranks of previous years. They have now been replaced by a circus of the absurd and the bizarre.

    Season 9 - Many people did not like the ninth season of Roseanne, but in its totality, I found it fascinating. The main problem was that it was clumsily written and directed. You have to look at this season in the context of Roseanne's actual life. By 1996, Roseanne herself had not been living a blue-collar lifestyle for over a decade. It was probably much easier for Roseanne to do something she knew - play a woman with a blue-collar background who comes into sudden wealth. Just prepare yourself for more than a few cringe-worthy moments of TV viewing.
  • redmiss1 June 2018
    Although I had previously rated "Roseanne" a 10, I've had to reevaluate my opinion. I admit there is no denying the relatability of the show along with a certain feeling of comfort that one feels while watching. A sweeping sense of nostalgia washes over you while watching older seasons and the reboot felt like a welcomed family reunion. But behavior matters and you can't remove the foundation without (sadly) damaging the ENTIRE structure. I hope the employees who are now out of work go to Barr directly for lost wages.
  • cowboygirl228 March 2018
    Wasn't going to watch this at all, but read a review that said it was great, so gave it a shot. What a disaster. Nothing in either episode made me laugh, or even crack a smile. Laugh track was beyond annoying, mostly because IT WASN'T FUNNY. Loved the original show, but this is bad.
  • I realized why this show was such a success. Roseanne was so darn cute, and John was a great portrayal of a good husband and father. It's a realistic portrayal of the lower middle class, I knew a few families like this growing up, but the Connors were the Cleavers compared to most of the others I knew.
  • I liked the Roseanne show when it was a blue collar comedy that made people laugh mostly about themselves. I didn't like it when it became preachy and liberal especially since half the cast of characters like Leon and his partner played by Martin Mull and Fred Willard were gay as was Sandra Bernhard's character and then the outing of Beverly played by Oscar winner Estelle Parsons. I felt the show was too much by then and it was making a political statement when there plenty of other statements. I felt the show went from being blue collar comedy to left wing liberalness. Don't get me wrong, I am a liberal and I support gay rights but I felt that the show's original premise and it's realism was lost aside to shocking audiences. While it was a shock factor then, it does not exist now. I loved Beverly played by Estelle Parsons who they were smart enough to use wisely and often. Laurie Metcalf's Jackie and Roseanne's herself were believable as sisters on the show. John Goodman's Dan deserved accolades for being the long-suffering husband. There were plenty of topics and smart enough to have casted George Clooney before ER. Yes, Roseanne's show became too much at times but it was funny and maybe you didn't agree with it or disliked the insanity but you saw yourself in the role.
  • uscsmit28 March 2018
    So, I have now lost all respect for the IMDb platform as these are obviously fake reviews. I'd say 9 times out of 10, I agree with the community on here, but to give this Roseanne reboot a 7.5 is complete absurdity. Honestly I was expecting to see a 4-5, maybe 6, but I can't even get there. Horrible acting, fake laughs, made me sick. Turned it off after 5 minutes. The only star is the girl from Shameless who is awesome and actually made a career for herself. Don't waste your time with this piece of trash. Leave Roseanne in the 80's or 90's, whenever it was, where she belongs.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I must say that "Roseanne" has got to be by far one of my all-time favorite television sitcoms. I watched it for its entire run on ABC from 1988 to 1997, and still watch it in reruns on Nick at Nite. It was a welcome departure from most family sitcoms of the time (i.e. Full House, Family Matters, The Cosby Show). While interesting and diverse (I watched them sometimes), these shows often lacked the portrayal of the typically less than ideal realities of everyday life. "Roseanne" was different in that it showed, to the extent possible, people as they really are. It proved that working class people and families can make you laugh. They don't have to be rich, blond, and thin to be funny.

    Roseanne Barr plays Roseanne Conner, a hard-working, sarcastic, but lovable wife and mother who is never short of "telling it like it is." John Goodman plays her husband Dan Conner, tough but lovable to mom and the kids. Oldest daughter Becky is the most rebellious and loves boys. Middle child Darlene is the tomboy, and takes after Roseanne with her sarcastic wit. Youngest child DJ takes after his father. Along for the ride is Roseanne's younger unmarried sister, Jackie, played by Laurie Metcalf. While intelligent and well-meaning like Roseanne, Jackie is much more naive and gullible. Other characters include Crystal, who later marries Dan's father Ed. Roseanne and Jackie's mother Bev, the domineering, passive-aggressive guru, is a recurring character. Among many others, we also have Becky's boyfriend and later husband Mark, Darlene's boyfriend David, friend Nancy (Sandra Bernhard), and Roseanne's boss at the restaurant, Leon (Martin Mull). Jackie later gives birth to son Andy, and Roseanne and Dan have a son Jerry.

    Over the years, Roseanne and Dan face many challenges that keep them on their toes. They bounce from one job to another before landing modest steady employment. Becky challenges them the most, especially when it comes to Mark. Darlene is similar when it comes to David. DJ keeps somewhat in the background in the early years, but becomes more prominent as he gets older. Jackie has many different careers and relationships, sometimes bizarre. The Conners lose more than they win, but through it all they "get by." This is why I enjoyed the show so much. It showed that life does not always go the way we want it to, unlike a lot of other shows, and we have to deal with this. But somehow we get by too!

    While I did not enjoy the last season as much (it was too far removed from it's original objective), it still ranks up there on my list of favorites. People of all races, ethnicities, ability levels, creeds, sizes, orientations, etc are just like us. This is how life is and truly should be!
  • I still watch Roseanne over and over saw all episodes and don't get bored of any of them this was the best show ever!!!!!
  • During its first six seasons, "Roseanne" was a classic sitcom which was filled with great characters and hilarious moments. If my rating of the series had been based on the first six seasons alone, I would probably have given it a 9 out of 10. Unfortunately, I had to take the final three seasons into account; and, the show lost a lot of points because of those seasons (especially the final season).

    During the first six seasons, the show was known for its stories about a working class family in Lanford, Illinois. The characters had great chemistry on screen; and, the characters of Dan Connor, Roseanne Connor, and Darlene Connor were known for their delivery of clever humor. Darlene's delivery of jokes was especially dry and funny.

    During season seven, it was obvious that something had changed. The show featured the same characters and the same setting; but, something was definitely wrong. It was as if the souls of the characters had disappeared; and, the stories seemed to revolve increasingly around the character of Roseanne Connor. Seasons seven and eight had their moments; but during those seasons, the show was a shadow of its former self. The writing wasn't at the same level as it had been before; and, the show was not as funny.

    During seasons seven and eight, the show began to do more episodes which featured sketches and parodies. This did not work well for a show like "Roseanne," which was sitcom. Sketches do not belong on a sitcom.

    If seasons seven and eight were weak, season nine was awful. In fact, most of season nine was outright unwatchable. During its final season, "Roseanne" became the Evil Knievel of shark jumping. I won't divulge the changes which were made to the show during the final season; but if somebody had told me about the changes ahead of time, I would not have believed that person until I had seen the changes for myself.

    To summarize, the first six seasons of "Roseanne" were definitely worth watching. During those first seasons, the show earned a loyal viewer-ship. Some viewers might not mind seasons seven and eight; but, season nine is hardly worth the bother. "Roseanne" deserves to be remembered for what it achieved. It is unfortunate that the series stayed on the air for too long.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Modern TV does not appeal to me, so in spite of having watched this for most of its network run and tuning in on occasion during re-runs, I didn't watch the recent revisal of the show that ended abrubtly and will be continuing without its leading lady. I knew Roseanne Barr from her stand-up appearances on the Tonight Show, finding her deadpan view of being a "domestic goddess" as hysterical, and her proclamation that God created gay men so fat women would have someone to dance with at weddings. So therefore when "Roseanne" was announced for a line-up on ABC's fall 1988 schedule, gay video bars around the country decided to add it to their line-up of shows to broadcast live, and they were not disappointed. Every Tuesday, Roseanne's gay fans would gather amongst their friends and other fans to laugh with the Conner family which, as the audience got to know them, showed a different view of America, the struggling lower middle class family, and opened many people's eyes to their plights which have not improved.

    While Roseanne Barr (later Arnold, later just Roseanne) first started acting, critics were not impressed, but in looking back at those early shows, you see not only the character, but an actress in development. Roseanne spoke most of her lines just like Roseanne would do her stand-up, and when Roseanne got angry at husband John Goodman, sister Laurie Metcalf or her three children, she seemingly shrieked her lines which grated on some people's nerves. To see her advance as an actress as writers changed (thanks to backstage upheaval) can be attributed to her getting acting classes on the set thanks to both Goodman and Metcalf, more experienced actors, plus Oscar winning recurring players Estelle Parsons and Shelley Winters, as well as the assortment of guest stars playing friends, family, co-workers and neighbors.

    The show dealt with many serious issues during its long run, and for 90 percent of its run, it was extremely well written and never resorted to sitcom stereotypes and cliches. It was only in its last two seasons that there were some questionable choices, but one thing never wavered in spite of the weaker plots: the quality of the acting and the love for its characters. Metcalf really became the breakout star, getting some seriously wonderful opportunities on stage and film, while Goodman seemed to be working on almost every new major movie when he wasn't taping the show. Roseanne even tried movie acting ("She Devil", playing rival to Meryl Streep!), as well as the theater (the witch in "The Wizard of Oz"), but personal demons seemed to keep her tied more to the show. Changes in casting (two Becky's) had some humorous moments on the show, and even a "Gilligan's Island" sequence had a great fantasy ending with the cast of that classic sitcom taking over, a rare reunion that had audiences in stitches.

    The characters of Roseanne and Jackie were extremely well developed as they tried to lead different lives than their childhood had allowed them to, taking the lesson from mother Estelle Parsons as learning they didn't want to be at all like her. In fact, and perhaps because I'm not a member of this family, the show was at its best when Parsons was on the show (more in the later seasons), and outrageously funny when fellow Oscar Winner Shelley Winters appeared as Nana Mary. Parsons' Beverly was indeed the biggest pain in the butt mother you could ever hope to see, but on occasion, showed her daughters a thing or two, especially when she informed them that the way they were putting Christmas tree garland on a sleeping Winters was all wrong. "Didn't I tell you that you start at the bottom?", she cries as they look on in amazement by her sense of fun that seemingly comes out of nowhere. The show in its last season seemed to really loose all track with little of John Goodman on screen and the fantasy of them winning the lottery, plus that ending where Roseanne revealed it was all in her imagination as a part of a book, especially the revealing of several major character's fates. They were all changed for the return of the show earlier in 2018, but the events of the return of the show are enough for a movie, let alone a TV series review.
  • acedrinker-113 June 2012
    7/10
    Ugh
    The best scenes in the catastrophe of "comedy" are the ones that don't include Rosanne. The first 2-3 seasons were tolerable, but then you could tell nearly to the episode when Rosanne was given too much power and creative control. She already is on the line of most annoying and least funny female "comedian" with Kathy Griffin because of this.

    The show continued to go downhill to the point where it went from a few chuckles here and there of blue collar comedy, to idiotic nonsensical Liberalism. Good job of destroying what could have been a half-decent concept. I'd rather stick to comedies that can hold their ground over time because of solid laughing moments aka Seinfeld.
  • vorazqux20 July 2008
    Roseanne should be considered one of the best sitcoms in television history as every classic show is a reflection of the times it represents. Roseanne has been off the air for about a decade now, and when I have a chance to watch it in syndication, I am always entertained. Even the last season, which was a disappointment, has its moments. It's also interesting to see how the characters evolved and changed over the years. I could be wrong about the following comment, but it seems somewhat obvious when Roseanne Barr was going through her divorce to Tom Arnold. Her performance on the show was more biting than usual during that particular season. Maybe it was the media, expectation, or something else. Either way, a new dimension to the show was added due to Barr's transformation (I believe it was Season 4 or 5).

    What really makes Roseanne stand out and keeps it in good company with other classic sitcoms is its blending of comedy and drama, often displayed in one scene. Elementally speaking, it reminds me of All in the Family, Maude, and Good Times, shows that defined showcasing dramedy in the 70s. Also, the performances were terrific. John Goodman was outstanding and underused as Dan. I look forward to when he is on screen. Sara Gilbert delivered a consistently excellent turn as Darlene, and then there's Roseanne Barr. She made her mark and did it well. Estelle Parsons was fantastic as Beverly, and Laurie Metcalf had some scene–stealing moments as Jackie. These are talented performers giving us quality television to remember, along with the writers, director(s), producers, and everyone else involved in the project.

    Anyone who finds Roseanne insulting, repugnant, and/or basically not worth watching may be missing the point of the show and the writing itself. Watch it again and really listen to the dialog. The characters are actually quite decent – they are simply not idealistic in a society that craves moral fortitude yet has difficulty maintaining a core foundation these days. Ozzie and Harriet they're not, but then again, a classic show is a reflection of the times it represents. Hence... Roseanne. The show would fair even better today with our present economy.

    Thanks to ABC for giving us Roseanne. We are the richer for it!
  • ...unless they find some ways to advance the characters, it won't last very long I think it would have worked better as a reunion TV movie as opposed to a new season.
  • I feel so bad for John Goodman and Laurie Metcalf for being stuck in this has-beens repeat of their earlier show. Roseanne Barr was a terrible person before, (remember the disgraceful rendition of our National Anthem?), and is not any better now. This show feels like an ad campaign for the Trump Whitehouse. Some of her lines seem like they came right from a Russian Sock Puppets keyboard.

    John Goodman can do so much better. And he has, as in Treme. He was outstanding. I can't understand why he ever agreed to get back into this swill.

    And Laurie Metcalf is trying, but they make her look stupid and wimpish. She does not offset Roseanne.

    I am sorry I watched the pilot. That was 30 minutes of my life that I will never get back.
  • I was twelve years old when "Roseanne" came out, and vividly remember it having such a huge impact on my family, as well as society as a whole. For the first time, middle-class families could identify with characters on a sitcom, and enjoy real life issues and problems being handled with utmost care and realism.

    What made "Roseanne" unique was its utter lack of vanity, superficiality, and unrealistic idealism. In the age of "The Cosby Show," and "Family Ties," Roseanne stormed in as an overweight, screaming mother who didn't always keep her house clean, didn't pay the bills on time, didn't always have the answer, and didn't keep her sexuality hidden. From the very first episode, viewers got to see a messy house, screaming kids who don't always listen, and parents who struggle with money, menial jobs, and weight issues. Finally, a real family on television! Can you think of another show where the female lead walks around the house with an xxx-large bright pink bathrobe, rollers in her hair, and can still be taken seriously? Whatever you might think of Roseanne personally (in terms of her public behavior), she never let it effect the quality of the show. The show benefited from WONDERFUL writing, a fantastic cast, and a pitch-perfect blend of comedy and drama. The show had some incredibly funny moments, combined with profoundly touching scenes that really played well on television; the show was never sappy, and stayed true to life. In my opinion, virtually every episode during seasons one through six, with rare exceptions, played out like thirty minute masterpieces. By seasons three and four, the show had reached perfection.

    Roseanne acted her heart out on this show, and got better every year. She could always deliver a sarcastic one-liner like no other, but as the show progressed she managed the dramatic scenes with perfect accuracy. She managed to infuse her strong, sarcastic exterior with an incredible dose of heart and generosity. John Goodman had exceptional chemistry with Roseanne, and turned Dan into a hard-working, loving father that we all wish we could have. Laurie Metcalf's Jackie was, perhaps, the shows most complex character, and, in my opinion, the best actor of them all. She could take even mundane lines and turn them into hysterical comedy. Metcalf turned Jackie into a cool, sympathetic character you always wanted around. The sister relationship between Roseanne and Jackie was perhaps the most realistic ever portrayed on TV.

    The kids of the show were also exceptional. I remember watching Darlene when I was a kid/teenager, and thinking "finally, a realistic depiction of a teenager." The iconic Darlene was a tomboy, depressed at times, and certainly not your typical happy, popular, beautifully perfect character. She had many challenges, emotions, and Gilbert pulled them all off with complete ease. Darlene was a hero to anybody who felt like they didn't fit in. Becky was the whiny, spoiled brat of the bunch, played beautifully by Lecy Garonson; she never hit a false note. Sarah Chalke, on the other hand, was sub par, and really should never have been cast as a replacement. Even DJ, the youngest of the bunch, had some incredible one-liners, and managed to be completely real.

    Overall, this show goes down as a masterpiece; it's exactly what a TV show should be: Hysterically funny, profound, insightful, relevant, and, above all, completely entertaining.
  • .that sounded like a good idea but once I got into it... not so much. I believe the series was innovative in the decade of it's original form. Now I feel embarrassed for all who were involved as I tried to watch. I could only manage to make it thru fifteen minutes pf this new incarnation before turning it off. Some things are just better as remembered than revisiting..
  • poonamkahlon29 March 2018
    One word - Cringe worthy. Not wasting time reviewing this. Something this low level will stop itself
An error has occured. Please try again.