User Reviews (27)

Add a Review

  • When Rob Lowe decided to wear his glasses for real in this film (in real life he's quite nearsighted) I think it was his and director Peter Bogdanovich's homage to Cary Grant in Bringing Up Baby. Would that Bogdanovich had as good material as Howard Hawks had with Grant and Katharine Hepburn.

    Rob's a near do well here, living at home with mother Jessica James and brother Ira Heiden and sometimes whomever mom's current boyfriend is, in this case it's Harry Carey, Jr. in one of his very few roles not in a western. Rob gets a jury duty notice and like most of us, he considers it one royal pain. But when he's chosen for the jury trial of Colleen Camp it's an opportunity he's been waiting for since grade school. Back in those childhood years he was crushing out on Camp big time and now she's on trial for attempted murder.

    I wrote a review for 12 Angry Men in which I said the film was flawed because of what Henry Fonda did, going to the accused's neighborhood and buying a switchblade similar to the murder weapon. That was absolutely nothing compared to what Lowe does while he's not deliberating on the evidence to prove the object of his affection is innocent.

    The film has its moments, but I'd have to say it was more silly than funny. Colleen Camp is not quite Katharine Hepburn, though Lowe does give a good try at a Cary Grant type comedy part.

    Still fans of Rob Lowe will like it.
  • That quote is from P.J. O'Rourke's guide to hosting a party in his classic work, "The Bachelor's Home Companion". To me, it pretty much sums up the appeal (what there is of it) of this film. Or to put it another way, in his effort to construct a "screwball comedy", Bogdonovich kept throwing things at the wall in the hopes that some of them would stick.Fortunately, some things do.

    Nothing about "Illegally Yours" is particularly inspired (in fact most of it is strained and contrived), and no one in it is particularly great at comedy...the best most of the actors can muster is a kind of wide-eyed incredulity. But the plot throws so many twists and turns at the viewer, and there are so many rapid-fire "bon-mots" and quirky lines and bad puns that eventually the movie reduced me to a state of mild bemusement...and after the movie had been hitting me over the head with "funny funny funny" for 40-50 minutes. I gave in and actually snorted with laughter once and chuckled a couple of other times. I even guffawed once. Just once, but that's still better than anything Ben Stiller has been able to do since "Mystery Men".

    I think it was easier for American filmmakers impress American audiences with screwball humor before Monty Python,Red Green,"Black Adder","Fawlty Towers" and similar imports caught on here. In comparison to Pythonesque and Newhartesque whimsy and wordplay, this movie's script is a bit stodgy and leaden. But it's still mildly funny even today, and none of the players (even Rob Lowe, who I've never liked) have anything to be ashamed of here.

    Do not skip your fiftieth viewing of "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" to see "Illegally Yours", but if IY is on opposite something dull and unfunny like "Gone Fishing", you may want to check it out.
  • Director Peter Bogdanovich seemed to have it all at one point early in his career, but I can't imagine a worse string of pictures than "At Long Last Love", "Nickelodeon", "Daisy Miller" and "Texasville", not to mention this one, a dud meant for theaters but relegated to dusty bins at the video store. Rob Lowe, outfitted to look like either Cary Grant or perhaps egomaniac Bogdanovich, stumbles around as a juror smitten with murder-suspect Colleen Camp. Camp, as proved in "They All Laughed" (a Bogdanovich bright spot), has the knack for screwball antics, but her character here is too brash and she fails to click with Lowe, whose bumbling is forced--to say the least. The convoluted plot hangs together by a thread, not helped by a bunch of "lovable" dopes in the supporting cast (including future Mrs. Bogdanovich, L.B. Straten). Cheeky, yes. Successful, no. *1/2 from ****
  • TSHunter6 January 2002
    This is one of the funniest movies I have ever seen. This, in my opinion, is Rob Lowe at his best. I'm not quite sure why this film has gotten such a low rating. I guess you either love it or hate it, but if nothing else, it is definitely worth a rental.
  • Wendylady17 November 2006
    Seriously, I can't imagine how anyone could find a single flattering thing to say about this movie, much less find it in themselves to write the glowing compliments contained in this comment section. How many methamphetamines was Bogdonovitch on during the filming of this movie? Was he giving a bonus to the actor that spat his lines out with the most speed and least inflection or thought? The dialogue is bad, the plot atrocious, even for a "screwball" comedy, and claims that the movie is an homage to classic film comedy is about the most inane thing I've ever heard. The cinematography is below the quality and innovation of that exhibited by the worst made-for-TV movies, the acting is awful (although I get the feeling that the fault for that lies squarely in the lap of the director), and speaking of which, did I mention the direction is so haphazard and inscrutable that it defies the definition of the word? The whole thing is a terribly unfunny (even in the much-beleaguered world of so-bad-it's-funny clunkers), soul-sucking, waste of two hours of your life that you'll never get back. Be afraid, be very afraid...
  • This tight, consistent, clever script acted by the excellent Rob Lowe and the voluptuous Colleen Camp should have resulted in a 1980s WHAT'S UP DOC? Sadly, Lowe is no Ryan O'Neal, and Colleen Camp, while lovely to look at, shows why she typically plays the Friend and not the Leading Lady in her many films. Still, good direction could have saved the day, but Bogdanovich is no less miscast than his actors. The sense of comedic timing, so crucial to this or any type of comedy, is sorely lacking here. Possibly the lion's share of the blame should lie with the film editor, but the director is ultimately responsible for the failure of this film.

    On the other hand, Colleen Camp gets more screen time in ILLEGALLY YOURS than in any film I can remember, so fans wishing to see more of her will want to view this flick. Rob Lowe fans, on the other hand, will find it more profitable to spend their time on his other, much better performances.
  • The 80s was Rob Lowe's decade; member of the Brat Pack, and the golden boy of cinema. Whilst usually cast just as the pretty boy, a sex-toy, Illegally Yours cast him as the silly, love-sick goof, who bumbles his way through a far-fetched silly murder cover-up from the point of view of a juror who was in love the suspect at junior school. The film is wall-to-wall one-liners, funny slapstick, slips and trips and Lowe falling over a lot. I've watched it a lot of times and it still makes me giggle, and there are lots of comedy set pieces; Lowe dressed as a woman in high heel slippers, the fantastic sunglasses disguise scene, his nervy rushing around, the crazy car chases and daft over-acting. It's not a film to take seriously, it's meant to be loopy and flying all over the place and I love it. It's not a 6/10 film as in superb cinematography but it's just a hoot. Every character is overblown, Colleen Camp and all the ensemble case are a caricature, funny, and I just love this film. It's one of my favourite comedies and they don't make them like this anymore – it's not rude, no bad language and really quite innocent. Turn back time and enjoy.
  • Seriously somewhere along the way someone equated amount of dialog with snappy or witty dialog. It is not, it turns out to be just painful dialog, with no rest for the ears. Yes the acting is painful, but sometimes that can be funny in a weird sort of way. Yes the plot is beyond stupid, but this is to expected in a "screwball" comedy. The dialog sets a low below the other factors by about a factor of 10. Avoid this at all costs.
  • My initial review of this was pretty scathing. After thinking it over I've decided I was probably too harsh since I was able to finish the film in one sitting which says something positive in my view. This is yet another Peter Bogdanovich attempt at an homage to the screwball comedies of yesteryear. Sadly, unlike most of his early work this one misses the mark. I've read Bogdanovich and Rob Lowe were going for Cary Grant but instead they wind up with Woody Allen. Look no further than Lowe's physical mannerisms and diction which seem patterned after Woody Allen's distinct style of nervousing, to say nothing of that cringey narration which also reminds me of many Allen films. Happy to see Colleen Camp in a decent sized role. There's just too many characters in this, most of them played by actors who aren't great at comedy. The most annoying actor in the cast is Ira Heiden playing Lowe's brother. He's best known as the nerd from Nightmare on Elm Street 3. His shrill voice made me mute the TV every time he comes onscreen.

    It's just not a good movie. There's no charm, no wit, no laughs, really no fun at all. I won't rate it lower because there is an effort even if the effort fails. It's something to kill a little time with I guess but nothing more significant than that.
  • I don't understand the hating on this movie. What I want from my comedies is that they are funny and feel at least slightly original, and this (to my great surprise) delivered in spades, which is more than can be said for most movies that call themselves comedies. The silliness never let up, the pacing never flagged.

    If you like the ridiculousness of movies like _The Man With One Red Shoe_ or _The Man Who Knew Too Little_, movies that are just a sequence of one insane coincidence after another, I think you'll like this.

    If your primary complaint about _Ron Burgundy_ was that it didn't explore the consolidation of the media business by corporations in enough detail, or that _The Hangover_ didn't pay enough attention to the harrowing effects of alcoholism on families around the world, well, then maybe this is not the movie for you.
  • SnoopyStyle17 July 2022
    Molly Gilbert (Colleen Camp) is falsely accused of murder and goes on trial. Richard Dice (Rob Lowe) is called in for jury duty. He is surprised to find Molly as the defendant. He actually had a childhood crush on her without her knowledge and strives to prove her innocence.

    This was panned by critics and director Peter Bogdanovich himself. Of course, I have to check it out. First, Rob Lowe is trying to play a bumbling nerd. He's genetically incapable of doing that. From the poster, I assumed the lead to be Corey Haim. Corey would be a better fit. Rob Lowe is trying so hard that it actually hurts to watch him. I try to imagine another actor in the role, maybe Corey. The screwball comedy is silly and light. The writing isn't good. Everybody keeps easily escaping. I don't think the story makes sense but that's doesn't really matter. Assuming the best of everything, this would still be a weak 80's comedy.
  • This one is a hilarious diamond in the rough. The acting and plot aren't that impressive, but the lines just keep on coming. This catches a lot of flack because it seems at first glance like, well, a bad movie, but it's so kooky that you can't help but be amused. The spastic lightening quick dialog and quirky characters keep it going... I was especially fond of Sharon, the Canuck on Shrooms eh? However, the one that really stole the show was Richard's little brother Andrew (Ira Heiden), his high pitched whining was somehow endearing. The whole movie rocked.
  • Lowe returns to the nest after, yet another, failed relationship, to find he's been assigned to jury duty. It's in the plans to, somehow, get out of it, when he realizes the defendant is the girl he's had a serious crush on since the first grade.

    Through living in the past by telling other people about his feelings towards this girl (played by Camp), Lowe remembers those feelings and does everything in his power to clear Camp of attempted murder, while staying away from the real bad guys at the same time, and succeeding in creating a successful film at the same time.

    I've heard that St Augustine is the oldest city in the US, and I also know it has some ties to Ponce de Leon, so the backdrop is a good place to start. Unfortunately, it's the only thing good about this movie. The local police are inept, the judge is an idiot, and the defense counsel does everything in her power to make herself look like Joanie Cunningham! I don't know whether to blame the director for poor direction, or for just letting the cast put in such a hapless effort.

    In short, this movie was so boring, I could not even sleep through it! 1 out of 10 stars!
  • While this movie may not be a show-stopping classic, it is funny and has an entertaining plot. Rob Lowe does seem somewhat out of his element here, though he does a good job with what has been given to him. Colleen Camp fans will love this movie, as she is as attractive as ever and we get to see her in a rare leading role. Some silly moments, but overall not a bad film. Some good footage of historic St Augustine as well.
  • This movie is probably the worst thing I've ever seen. I wasted my life watching this. There is no intelligent writing as claimed by the absolute brain dead people claiming so in these other reviews. The review where this person says they "loved it love a 9" by Isabella. Read that review. Apparently this is a movie for twenty somethings who think they are so unique and special and see the world different, and of course, who can predict every movie. In other words, this movie Is for those of basic intelligence who think they are elevated somehow. If you've seen this movie, find the review I'm talking about and try not to gag.

    Most importantly, the director and Rob Lowe have talked about how bad this movie is. Anyone claiming this movie is some hidden gem must know better than those directly involved, who have called it their worst film.
  • Rob Lowe is horrible miscast here and the plot barely holds together. The voice over is pointless and the editing choppy. All in all, this attempt to make a Cary Grant led screwball comedy just doesn't work like it should. Too bad, because with a different lead it could have been okay. Bogdonovich's worst movie by far.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I've been told by friends and family who live down south how gorgeous Saint Augustine is, and while I'd certainly like to visit there, this film saved me a trip. That's not enough to recommend the film however, because it seems to be producer and director Peter Bogdanovich's effort to recapture the magic of the 1972 screwball comedy Masterpiece "What's Up Doc". Star Rob Lowe even seems to be emulating Ryan O'Neal with his Cary Grant non-impression, playing an equally clumsy geek who ends up involved in a murder case as part of a jury.

    While "What's Up Doc" ended with the court case, this pretty much starts with one, with O'Neal having a crush on the attempted murder suspect, Colleen Camp. In fact, the judge on the case looks exactly like the judge from that 1972 classic. Lowe's mother on screen (Jessica James) is also written to be inappropriately trying not to be her age, but Mabel Albertson was. Lowe pretty much begin stocking Camp, certain that her life is in jeopardy.

    While "What's Up Doc's" absurdities worked because they were surprising and magical, here, it becomes far too forced and the characters are even more cartoonish than anything out of The Bugs Bunny/Road Runner hour. Lowe seems trying too hard to be sweetly nebbish, but he's defeated by the weak script and a ton of absurdities that makes the worst of the 'Pink Panther" movies classic in comparison. An extreme embarrassment for all concerned, it would have suited everybody had this just been shelved rather than face the humiliation that it had by barely lasting a week in the few theaters it darkened.
  • I swear if I did ever tried cocaine I'd be able to relate to this film perfectly. Its pace, as well as the dialog, churns out at speeds that some viewers might need to stop and relax their heads.

    There are great little elements that pop up through out the film, like how Rob Lowe's character seems to always be loosing a shoe, or how some characters keep running spirals around his zigzagged path. The story was put together extremely well and the direction seems flawless.

    The movie reeks of clumsy and cuteness. This is one I think most could enjoy. A few laugh-out-loud-even-if-you-are-alone moments ensure that I'll certainly be watching this again.
  • This is a good movie with plenty of comedy and action. Yes Colleen Camp is fun and funny and so is Rob Lowe. The Canuck is another entertaining gem. There are a few illogical twists toward the end but otherwise it is a wonderful movie. Anyone that loves Colleen Camp will love the movie.
  • If you want a fun light-hearted silly movie, this is it. A good summer and chill movie.
  • During the 1980s there were a whole series of movies that do not seem to have generated a great amount of publicity but were very entertaining, enjoyable, underrated and are presently of great nostalgic value. `Illegally Yours' definitely falls within this category.

    Rob Lowe provides an excellent performance as the somewhat eccentric but nevertheless very amusing Richard Dice. The whole of the cast follows this high standard and quality of acting and their combined performances contribute a dimension of entertainment and enjoyment to this movie. The script is also quite interesting for a considerable period of time and the style and the format of this movie also enhances this quality. I would definitely rate this movie highly and provide it with a 9/10
  • InMyTribe20 October 2001
    Often referred to as a third-rate 'They All Laughed' (a Bogdanovich film from 1981) this film focuses on Rob Lowe a 'hopeless Romeo' who, as luck would have it is a juror on a case where his first love (when he was 6) is now being tried for murder. Most of the film is taken up by him following her while hiding behind newspapers, sunglasses and even a very bad attempt at drag. Lowe is blatently mis-cast as 'our hero' as he dons a ridiculous pair of eye-glasses (reminiscent of other Bogdanovich klutzes Ryan O'Neal in Whats Up Doc and John Ritter in They All Laughed). However, the rest of the cast is excellent in the rip-fire dialog. Jessica James is sassy as Lowe's disappointed mother and Colleen Camp, as ever, is a delight to watch as the daffy murder suspect. Unfortunately this has been Colleen Camp's last attempt in a lead role to date and one hope's that director Bogdanovich will find another vehicle for her underatted talent (he used her to great affect in 'They All Laughed' 1981). This film is much better viewed the second time around and hopefully will gain a cult audience in years to come. To be watched by Camp fans only. ****1/2 stars.
  • One of the great pleasures of the movie business is finding a forgotten treasure that you had forgotten about or didn't know existed. This picture is just wonderful and is an excellent addition to the Bogdanovich oeuvre. Which brings up the question - where is he and why isn't he working? The Johnny Cash songs were just terrific as well.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make successful in show business." Such are the words of legendary Hollywood producer, David Brown, taken from an excerpt in The Friedkin Connection, an autobiography from William Friedkin, one of the shining stars of the New Hollywood generation. Much has been made of the glory days of the 70s, and the films made at that time; more has been said on how Lucas and Spielberg single-handedly destroyed those glory years with their own prodigious and prototypical blockbuster films. After the 70s, many of the New Hollywood boys struggled in their careers. Friedkin was one such victim. Coppola's career never recovered. Peckinpah and Ashby's careers (and lives) ended with the death of New Hollywood. Yet no single career from this group took on the dramatic highs and lows akin to that of Peter Bogdanovich. After an impressive career as a historian and writer of the great Hollywood masters (Ford, Welles, Hawks, etc) Peter went on to direct his own films, seen through the eyes of the critics as homages to the great masters he so revered.

    After a string of big hits, Bogdanovich experienced a string of maligned works (Nickelodeon, At Long Last Love), which permanently damaged his career, to say nothing of his personal relationships at the time.

    Yet time has been kind to these films. A restored cut of both Nickelodeon and At Long Last Love have since been released, and the films have experience a kind of critical renaissance. The same would occur for his highly personal 80s film Mask. Despite all this newfound success, there are still two films of his post-Paper Moon films that have yet to receive such treatment: Illegally Yours and Texasville.

    For now, let us discuss Illegally Yours, a film which I had no hopes of enjoying going into it. Just about everyone, even the director himself, have spoken solely ill-words toward this film (Bogdanovich has been on record as saying that this is his worst film). So imagine my surprise when I began watching this film and found myself enjoying it. Rob Lowe is a revelation in this film. Though he would go on to show his great comedic chops in other films and television shows (most notably Parks and Recreation), it feels revelatory in this film. Make no mistake, this is a screwball comedy of the highest order. The movie begins in a kind of movie of the week way, with Rob Lowe narrating to the audience what the set-up for the film is, which might be the worst part of the film. On the other hand, it helps to set up the comically convoluted plot, so perhaps it works as best as it could. Not enough can be said of Bogdanovich's composition, which is precise to the point of mathematics. Not a frame is wasted, and every shot is always an opportunity to set up the next bit of information. Only Jackie Chan's editing is more precise, and that's saying something. I can understand how some people might be turned off by the material. The screwball comedy has really been in favor since the 1940s (though I'll still take the worst of Hollywood screwballs over what's passed for comedy nowadays), and the film wears its charm on its sleeve. That being said, in the words of Lars Von Trier "it works only as much as you want it to work." This is the attitude I'd recommend bringing to this film. Come in with an open mind, and you may find yourself enjoying it as much as I did.

    Bogdanovich has previously stated that test screenings proved the film to be a great success, yet Dino DeLaurentiis (the film's producer) took it upon himself to recut the film in the version that is available today, which bombed hard at the box office. Peter blames this cut for ruining the film, a fate that befell the previously mentioned films. Yet time has proved those films to be enduring works, and this film is no exception. The fact that I enjoyed it so much only makes me wonder how much better the preview cut could have been. Either it's just as good as this version (unlikely), or it may have been a comedic masterpiece. The chance for the latter only has me convinced that this movie deserves a reappraisal, and hopefully a director's cut.

    Until then, I am satisfied that this movie exists at all, as it is a clearly underrated gem from Bogdanovich's catalogue. Recommended for anyone who's looking to unwind and watch an unpretentious comedic romp. Especially appropriate around winter time, given the films Christmas setting. At long last... I can say without a doubt I love this movie.
  • I have no clue why this has such a low rating. The lowest rating I could give this is an 8/10 and I loved it like a 9. I was born in 94 and this was apparently made in 88. I just watched it for the first time free on YouTube. When I read the premise my expectations were low. I watch it at the end of my day and I laughed so much. I usually don't enjoy movies as much as other people because they tend to be slow for me and I can easily guess ahead to what happens next and am usually right. It ruins surprise and suspense for me. With the absence of mystery my mind gets critical of the other aspects of the film and it's just not pleasant. However this film was different. It kept my attention the whole time. What I thought was going to happen didn't happen. It was thrilling to experience surprise again in something fictional. I haven't had that in a long time. Also the main star Rob playing I think it was Richard Dice is stunning to look at. The young girls in this were gorgeous too. The story really impressed me and there were funny puns in here. I love true crime and while this was fictional there was crime and intense drama involved. I watch lots of stand up comedy and love to laugh and watch comedy and this was definitely a hilarious comedy. I'm into older guys like the main character is into older ladies and I'm caring to a fault like the main guy. It was fun seeing some similarities played out in a movie similar to how I am and what I like. I loved this, I couldn't guess what came next, there's serious eye candy in here, just an unpredictable plot and fun storyline. I'm very impressed. A lot of my favorite media comes from the 80's, it was a good time for film, especially story wise. Like yes today there's better costumes, film equipment, etc. However I feel like the stories are lacking when I compare them to stuff like this.
An error has occured. Please try again.