Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    The only criticism I would have of this enthralling Polish language film by the great Polish-French director Krzysztof Kieslowski is his use of the "opened window" conceit. Magda (Grazyna Szapolowska) is a woman who lives alone in a high rise housing development. She is sexy and cynical to the point of not believing in love. To her it is all desire, and the fulfillment or frustration of desire. Across the way from her lives a virginal young man by the name of Tomek (Olaf Lubaszenko) who has been spying on her from his apartment window through a telescope.

    He lives with a friend's mother (Stefania Iwinska) who looks after him as her own son. He works in the post office and obsesses about Magda's life. He watches her with her beaux. He even goes so far as to write a couple of phony money order slips for her and put them in her mailbox just so she will have to go to his window and ask about them. When she does he is able to examine her features closely. Is his an obsession or is it love? Kieslowski's answer is that it is love, love with the kind of depth and feeling that Magda cannot even imagine until she experiences it. And then she is amazed and dumbfounded.

    The key scene in the movie occurs when Tomek is finally able to be together with the object of his love, in her apartment, with her telling him that "When a woman wants a man she gets wet inside." And she invites him to check it out, so to speak. But what happens does not lead to any kind of fulfillment. Instead Tomek is inadvertently humiliated.

    And that's the story, more or less. As usual with Kieslowski, human feelings predominate and are stark and one might say conflicted--the conflict arising between humankind's baser instincts and the more civilized ones of society. What he does here is turn the stalker into the saint, in a sense, and the object of his love into something unworthy of that love.

    The question might arise: is it realistic to believe that a woman would leave her windows open and her lights on for all to see inside while she goes about her private life? No, it isn't. But we have to accept this device. After that the film is fully realistic to the point of even being mundane in its depiction of middle class city life. The characters are ordinary and even a little boring except for Tomek's supreme obsession. It is this "jewel" in the heart of the Polish city that lifts his life and her life above the ordinary. Even though we know that she is too old and too world-weary for him and that he is too hopelessly young and inexperienced for her for lasting love to ever bloom between them, we cannot help but think how wonderful it would be if we could all feel as he does, or be the object of such love.

    Usually when this theme is worked out it is the obsessed who suffer greatly, it is the obsessed who are to be pitied--and we do to some extent feel something close to that for Tomek. But here it is Magda who we end up pitying the more because of her inability to love. Compared to Tomek she is a deprived creature who will never find true happiness--unless she learns this lesson she has gotten from this young man whose passion for her was unlike anything she had ever experienced before.

    And this is Kieslowski's point: it is not only better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all. It is only through love that we can truly identify with another human being. We see this in the scene where Madga is looking through Tomek's telescope into her apartment window and recalling what he had seen one day, the day that she had come home and spilled the milk and sat at the table crying over that spilled milk (very typical of Kieslowski to use such an obvious, but telling and entirely apt cliché) after a breakup with one of her boyfriends. In memory she sees Tomek looking at her crying and running her finger through the spilled milk, and she realizes the depth of his commiseration with her and his love for her, and in her mind's eye she sees him beside her (as he truly was psychologically) with his hand on her shoulder and love in his heart.

    We might think that at some other time she will look back on a relationship she had had in her life and realize that the failure was due to a lack of love on her part. Indeed she more or less reveals that to us when she tells Tomek's "Godmother" that no, she is not the right person for Tomek. We know that she is too cynical and would only use him temporarily for gratification, and that would be all.

    But I was left with the sense that Magda would indeed learn from her experience and would be transformed. There is this sense of hope and the possibility of emotional and spiritual growth that is often seen in the films of Krzysztof Kieslowski.

    (Note: Over 500 of my movie reviews are now available in my book "Cut to the Chaise Lounge or I Can't Believe I Swallowed the Remote!" Get it at Amazon!)
  • A gripping and intriguing story about loving someone from afar. This is one of those films that I randomly pick up from whatever thread I come across, and now, having seen it, I am really surprised that it's mostly unknown. From the late Polish director Krzysztof Kieslowski---I know, good luck on pronouncing his name, this is the extended version of the sixth episode of The Decalogue. Tomek is nineteen years old, a single guy who works in a post office. Every night, he spies on Magda, a middle-aged woman who lives in the building across. He falls in love with her and decides to profess his love one day after seeing her cry the previous night. At first, Magda doesn't take him seriously and she eventually hurts him. What follows after is both tragic and moving. This film is really spell-binding, from the powerful human emotions it displays to its sincere silent moments. It is a true gem of cinema, a special story waiting to be told. The characters are very real and the emotions they convey very honest. The obsession and the desperation felt by the protagonists are simply too painful to watch. This film is not readily available to some but it is worth every second of searching.

    http://iwascalledclementine.multiply.com/reviews
  • Warning: Spoilers
    (Spoilers) Magda's apartment is across a courtyard from Tomek's. Outside of working as a clerk in the local post office Tomek's main passion is spying on Magda through his telescope. As shy as he is, he is driven by his obsession to establish contact with Magda.

    I view this movie as more of a parable than as a believable drama. Would Magda leave all of her windows curtain-less? Would she not flee her stalker?

    At first I fluctuated between being made very uncomfortable by Tomel's voyeurism, but came to understand that his obsession arose from an immature concept of love as platonic--he answers "no" to Magda's questioning if he wants to kiss her or have sex with her. Magda is coming from the opposite position of feeling that love does not exist, only sex.

    In the intense crucial scene where Magda gently seduces Tomek by merely placing his hands on her thighs, Tomek is stimulated to the point of having an orgasm while still fully clothed. This so shatters his concept of love, and of himself, that he runs away and later attempts suicide.

    On Magda's side, when she comes to understand just how powerfully Tomek felt about her, she realizes that her feelings for him have been more than sexual.

    Had both Tomek and Magda come at their encounter with the idea that love has both platonic and sexual aspects, then maybe they could have had something meaningful between them. The movie ends with Magda envisioning what could have been.

    Zbigniew Preisner's rather sentimental and repetitive score is a bit of a departure from his more commonly operatic formalism, but effective nonetheless, with the themes reflecting the storyline.
  • Kieslowski's movies are very unique in the sense of reflecting on feelings. One needs to think outside of the box and try to go beyond the surface... His goal is not to create an average love story, but to put love bare as it is in the center. What is love? One could list a number of adjectives, to say the least; but instead let's just use one sentence: love wants nothing in return. To love and being loved, two sides of a coin, is presented to us in this beautiful movie. Little conversation, nice music, great frames and shots, well-chosen actors, actresses, although very few; intense, touching, and serious.

    It helps a bit if the watcher knows some about Eastern-European culture. But it is by no means necessary. One should only have been given the gift of being loved and to have loved.
  • Unlike the other masterpiece in his Decalogue, Killing, in 'A Short Film About Love' Kieslowski treats the subject of love with an extraordinarily delicate, rather than a polemic, eye. As ever he manages to express more with subtlety than most directors ever will with expression: it is rather what is not said, what is not expressed, that leaves an indelible mark upon us.

    Olaf Lubaszenko's central performance as the boy is, rather than 'opaque' as it has been termed, engrossing from the start. His innocence and fragility, just like the film's, are an invitation to the intimacy we progressively acquire. We, the film's audience, watch engrossed and exposed just as does he, and, in another sense, does the subject of his observations. His telescope becomes a direct motif; distance, separation, enlargement: all the things the filmmaker provides for the viewer. Thus, at emotional, intellectual and metacinematic levels the film explores its themes: observation and love.

    While it may not come to solid conclusions (nor ought it to), the sensitivity with which the director watches his actors is utterly compelling. The resultant negotiation between man and women, subject and observer, viewer and filmmaker is a relationship, a love affair. Perhaps Barthes might have sought to go further, waiting for the end of the film, its 'death', to find psychological and sexual consummation to such an affair, and the film may support such a reading. Even a far less academic approach is sufficient, however, in order to enjoy the work at it appears at face value. We do not need to analyse in order to feel, and it is the film's emotional impact that remains when our brief voyeurism, our visit to the cinema, ends.
  • I suppose Gaspar Noe never seen this film, otherwise he would've known how to make a movie about love.

    I have no words...
  • I invite viewers of this film to compare it with the short version (Dekalog 6) and the script. All three differ from one another. They have different endings and lead to different interpretations.

    In this film, the feature length version, Kieslowski portrays human love poetically, authentically, and powerfully. I consider Tomek as a lover by the form of incarnation. He takes into different forms (post worker, milkman, voyeur) in order to show his love towards Magda. It is important to notice that Tomek sheds his blood when Magda has sex with others. There is a scene in which Magda spills a bottle of milk and cries. Tomek sees her from his telescope. Only he is present for Magda. Overall, Tomek's love is both sacrificial and redemptive.

    After Tomek's hospitalization, Magda dresses more conservatively. She does not engage in sexual affairs with any man. In this sense, Tomek's love redeems the lustful Magda. The commandment (Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery) functions in the background. We normally perceive a voyeur as being adulterous. But in Tomek's situation, he peeps into Magda not as an adulterous voyeur. He loves Magda by peeping her as an incarnate. He expresses sacrificial, and redemptive love in a humane and authentic manner.
  • sorry about the summary title, but i hate pithiness. this is, of course, more than just a film i like. it's beautiful. the scene when the woman fantasizes about what might have been with the boy is heartrending, and you don't have to have lived in communist East Europe to understand her sense of loneliness. others think that "A Short Film about Killing" was the stand out from the Dekalog, but to me this is the director's finest achievement, and the harshest and boldest treatment of love that you could see on celluloid. The most important film of my life.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is first and foremost about film, film making, and film viewing. Film viewing involves a sort of film making as you take the images and cobble them together, which is why different people can see different films from the same images given.

    The boy is both the director and the viewer as he cobbles together the images from his telescope. The woman is both the film and the director, as she IS the image and decides what images to show him.

    They meet and the film he created is not the film she is. Then at the end, film itself becomes the film maker/viewer. She creates the film and the boy has also become the film.

    This is some great stuff here...film viewer as film maker...film creating film...life as film...film as life.

    It is about love too. Romantic love is but a movie we create using films as source (it used to be literature).

    Intelligent. Kieslowski.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    A Polish art-house director Krzysztof Kieslowski is most well known for his international films, La double vie de Véronique (1991) and the Three Colours trilogy: White, Blue and Red. Kieslowski graduated from Łódz's film school in Poland, from which many directors have started their journey, for instance Andrzej Wajda and Krzysztof Zanussi. Krzysztof started by directing documentaries, as many do. From documentaries he moved to television films and then to fiction features. Kieslowski is very well known from his TV-series "Dekalog" (1989), which still is seen as one of the highest achievement of European television. Dekalog is a ten episode long series about The Ten Commandments, each episode deals with one commandment. Some might find it odd that an atheist made a TV-series about The Ten Commandments, but Kieslowski doesn't approach the subject religiously as he does ethically. Because the Bible and The Ten Commandments have had a huge impact on our conception of what is right and what is wrong. As an entirety the series builds a picture of a modern man facing moral problems.

    This brief introduction leads us to Kieslowski's film A Short Film About Love (Krótki film o milosci). From two episodes of Dekalog Kieslowski decided to make full length films, episode five: Thou shalt not kill (A Short Film About Killing) and episode six: Thou shalt not commit adultery (A Short Film About Love). Both, the episode and the film, are very interesting. And the perspectives the viewer takes change. When watching the episode one tries to find a bond with the commandment - Thou shalt not commit adultery. But when watching the film one might simply look it as a survey of love in the world we live in.

    As in all episodes of Dekalog, so does A Short Film About Love take place in Polish suburb near Warsaw. Kieslowski tries to build his own world view in this soulless place full of loneliness and selfishness. Kieslowski says in his interview book, Kieslowski on Kieslowski that the most interesting thing in this film is perspective; the film is divided into three parts. First we see a boy, 19-year-old Tomek who is stalking a woman. We don't know anything about this woman, we only see what Tomek sees. He is disturbing the woman, trying to see her and ruin her relationships. Suddenly we see them together for a little while, the woman upsets Tomek and Tomek cuts his wrists. Now the third part starts, we see everything from the perspective of the woman. She starts to feel pity, yearning, compassion and love towards Tomek. But the camera never goes to the hospital with Tomek, we only see what the woman sees. And in the end the woman looks into the telescope - into herself.

    When watching A Short Film About Love as a film about the commandment Thou shalt not commit adultery, I interpreted it like this. In the film we see a lot of glass, windows, the glass could be the motive of the film. In the beginning Tomek breaks the window to get inside the warehouse. He also stalks the woman behind his window, and sees her behind her window. Also there is a glass shaped like a circle next to the woman's window. To me the glass, the window symbolizes the illusion. Magda (the woman) breaks Tomek's illusion of love, by showing that there is no love, that there is only sex. Then Tomek breaks Magda's idea of love, he breaks her hard shell. When I watched the episode I thought this was the "Adultery" they committed. They broke the illusion. Thou shalt not commit adultery.

    But before I had seen Dekalog, I had seen the film, so then I didn't think about the commandment, all I thought was the major subject the relation between love and loneliness. One sees love as a pure, beautiful thing, but isn't sure how to show it and the other sees love simply as sex, she doesn't think that love even exists. The viewer obviously sees that Tomek isn't alright, he is sick. He is in love. In our selfish, cold and cynical world love can't be anything else except a sickness. A small detail about this is when the godmother is watching Poland's beauty queen contest - is this love in our society?

    Krzysztof Kieslowski's series Dekalog and all his later films are born from the hands of this amazing trio: Kieslowski himself as a writer/director, Krzysztof Piesiewicz as the screenwriter and Zbigniew Preisner as the film score composer. I think Preisner was very important to Kieslowski. His music added a new level of beauty to his films, all of us who have seen The Double Life of Veronique, know what I mean. Preisner's music is honest, true and beautiful just as Kieslowski's films. Another important man in Kieslowski's production was the cinematographer, Sławomir Idziak who worked with him in Veronique, Blue and Dekalog: episode 5 (Thou shalt not kill). So Kieslowski's film A Short Film About Love isn't just a new version of Hitchcock's Rear Window, it is a picture of a lonely man, it's a moral study about our conception of love and also a very beautiful story.
  • A hauntingly accurate portrayal of social ineptitude, hypersensitivity, obsession and delayed emotional growth. Disturbing at times and heartbreaking at times. The pain of the main character is so vividly-conveyed you could almost feel it. Fine work by Kieslowski.
  • We've seen various riffs on Hitchcock's 'Rear Window' since the release of the said masterpiece in 1954. We've seen Brian De Palma dive further into the voyeuristic core of 'Rear Window' and double down on the sleaziness to show us the dark underbelly of the show business lifestyle in Los Angeles in 'Body Double'. We've seen 'Disturbia' which was a bit of remake of 'Rear Window' specifically made mainly with the teenage/young adult demographic in mind. But in my opinion, out of all the films made subsequently that play around with the inherent 'peeping tom' gimmick of 'Rear Window', the only one(out of the ones I've seen) that distinguishes itself and deserves to be called a 'masterpiece' in its own right is Kieślowski's 'A Short Film About Love'.

    The shortened version of the film was used for Episode 6 for the epic mini-series 'Dekalog'. In my opinion both the shortened version as well as this longer film version have their own distinct personalities. The film works as a subversion of conventions as well as a deep exploration of the abstract concept of 'love'. It is a subversion of conventions, because we see an immensely sensitive depiction of a young man who is a primarily a peeping tom, and he spends his time secretly watching an attractive older woman who lives in the opposite apartment, which is inherently creepy. But the twist is that Tomek doesn't do it for sexual stimulation, he does it because watching this woman(Magda) go about her mundane daily routine gives him a different form of stimulation which he describes as 'love'. Once the central surface element of the peeping goes out of the way in the narrative, in the 2nd half of the film, Kieślowski doubles down on the concept of 'love' and starts asking questions through the two central characters Tomek and Magda. Does 'love' have a place to exist in the modern world or is it a thing of the past? Can a romantic connection between two human beings be forged only through sex with eventual orgasms, or is there something beyond the desires of the flesh, something more transcendent? The film also ends up answering these questions or at least Kieślowski gives us a clear indication of his attitude towards the concept of 'love' in his characteristic poetic ways.

    As I wrote earlier, there are various moments of poetry or poetic realism in the film that transcend grounded, realistic storytelling. Like the moment where Magda after an argument with one of her lovers spills the milk which Tomek delivered at her doorstep, all over her table as Tomek looks on from his apartment room via the telescope. Or the moment of pure joy after Tomek asks Magda out on a date,etc. With the ending, Kieślowski goes beyond poetic realism and ventures into territories of magical realism but without compromising the humane, tender tone of the film. The ending to the film actually is remarkably different to the ending of the shortened episode in 'Dekalog', but they both make the same thematic implication.

    The acting from the two central actors Olaf Lubaszenko and Grażyna Szapołowska is nothing short of special. Their individual scenes as well as the scenes that they share together are incredibly rich with subtlety, with pathos and with genuine emotions. Apart from the actors, something else that has to be admired for helping Kieślowski with the film is the beautiful music and score by Zbigniew Preisner which is rich with a sense of melancholic sweetness.

    Highly Recommended.
  • As touching as the feelings of loneliness are in this young man who spies on a woman with a telescope are, there is too much of a violation here, and her reaction, to respond to him despite all his creepy behavior, seemed pretty strange to me. As organic as the film seems, with a sense of realism in the male character and his surroundings, the female character seems pretty unreal. There is certainly a mood created of loneliness and the desperation of trying to find someone to love, and the film may be asking questions about what love is after all - e.g. does studying someone so closely for a year in their most private moments allow you to know them at some level where you can truly love them for what they are? - but I guess I just couldn't get past the point that the woman reacts to him this way. He's shown to be a sympathetic, lonely guy; she actually questions whether she's "right" or good enough for him because of her involvement with multiple men. It seems pretty backward in that way, and I didn't see all that much that was profound in the filmmaking or script either. Not awful, but not for me.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Everything about this movie suggest the work of a pretentious young man who thinks his work is deep and moving. This was my first Kieslowski film, but if his other movies are anything like this, I'll be giving them a pass.

    Our main character is Tomek, a creepy stalker whose mind seems not to have matured any further than the age of 12. We watch him spy on an older woman who's become jaded and views love as synonymous with sex. He harasses her constantly in the innocent and futile hope of getting her to talk to him. Eventually, he gets his wish and she falls completely head-over-heels for him. The whole thing is extremely unrealistic, and suggested to me that the director is a real insecure guy. The whole story and script play out like an personal sob-story of "Why don't girls like me? I'm such a nice guy! I'm kind and gentle and all they ever do is go out with jerks who give them sex!"

    I'm kind of shocked how everyone fell under the director's spell here. Everyone in the reviews here is gushing about how this film is a wonderful portrayal of love. Love? Where's the love? Certainly not from Tomek. The argument could be made that his love is pure because he is pure of heart, but this isn't at all the impression I got from the film. He's obsessive, creepy, and honestly a bit scary. His "love" is clearly an infatuation, and is entirely baseless. He doesn't know this woman, and has only observed her through subversive sexual acts. The scene in which he asks his mother why people cry is laughable, and the scene in which he slits his wrists is completely unbelievable. Why did he do that? He was embarrassed that he splooged in his pants? Big deal. It's an insult to people who struggle with thoughts of suicide.

    So what's the message here? "Love is more than sex!!!!!!!!!"? Yeah, well, obviously. Of course it is, and more than that love is certainly not how it's portrayed in this movie. The complexities and subtleties of love are not at all explored, rather the director wanks off in shots he thinks are deep and moving and poetic. Just because something is slow-moving, often silent, and utilizes an emotional violin soundtrack doesn't mean it's meaningful.

    Huge disappointment.
  • I have watched this movie 10 years ago when I was feeling that love was an impossible happiness to achieve and it always accompanied disappointments.

    Now that I am a happy man and I am not so pessimistic about love and life. However, this movie still fills my soul with wonder: How can love, disappointments and life be described so beautiful, like a poem, stylish and touching...

    I will remember it as long as I believe in love.
  • i watched it last night and it completely blew me away. what a brilliant, wonderful, heart touching,.... ( running out of adjectives ) film. while watching it a rarest thing happened to me, tears filled my eyes. last time i remember tears rolling down, it was while watching "to kill a mockingbird". it's actually a good thing that it is one of cinema's best kept secrets because there are people who don't have the heart to appreciate it. i am 19 and a straight guy and i can say for sure there are morons who would call it the crappiest, lousiest film ever. so at least it has been saved from those god forsaken creatures. anyway i just love this movie. my ratings 10/10
  • "A Short Film About Love" is a psychological and unconventional love story that urges the viewer to really feel something from the very beginning until the wonderful ending. It's difficult to be impassive, to not feel anything about the story of a lonely young man who fell in love with a distant neighbor and whom he peeps at with stolen binoculars.

    The story is told through the lens of the binoculars from where 19-year-old Tomek (Olaf Lubaszenko), a shy Post Office worker who spies his opposite neighbor Magda (Grazyna Szapolowska), a very promiscuous woman. In a Hollywood story many people would have thought that he wants to have sex with her and that he's a perverted. But, his actions are quite different and he'll always try to find a way to be near her and the way he does this approaches are quite odd, disturbing Magda's peace by sending false notices or calling the gas company when she's with another guy at her home.

    He practically knows everything about her and this obsession gives him a return from the woman who thinks she can play with him just like she does with other guys but things can and will follow through some desperate and sad ways.

    Writer and Director Krzysztof Kieslowski (who wrote the screenplay along with his collaborator Krzysztof Piesiewicz) tells us a story about a dry and tedious world who tends to suffocate and destroy the notion of love (Magda says to Tomek that she doesn't believe in love), and feelings are thrown to the wind by mere acts, and the best thing someone can do is just sit and watch things happen just like Tomek does being an observer because to be part of them it might not be so interesting in the way you thought it could be. Themes of loneliness, pain, emptiness, the lack of communication are intertwined in a very peculiar and interesting way.

    But it's not just sad things, there's hope and some funny things too. Perhaps the most positive of the characters is the old lady who lives with Tomek, the grandmother of his only friend, and she likes the boy very much and wants him to be settled with someone, she's the one who really cares about him. She's the most communicative figure in the film and every time she says good things to him about how a girl likes to be treated and other things.

    In a world where it's more easy to shout and complain about everything than to say "I Love You!" Tomek finds his way; he's a bold character with an awkward way to express what he considers to be love. I really prefer his ideal of what love is than to the concept presented in "Atonement" for instance (great film though).

    It is a realistic story but at the same time it's not. If the director presents a real world with real situations in one hand, on the other he gave us a romantic and cinematic notion of some very fantastic and beautiful things (in real life many people would've call the police if they met a obsessive stalker. Instead of that we see a curious woman who wants to know more about this guy). This contradiction works and life itself has many of them.

    Kieslowski once again made a wonderful movie, very calm, his camera allows you to see all the details, tiny little things that makes a tremendous effect on the story and in the viewer. The slow pace is precisely great to show Tomek's perspective looking inside of Magda's apartment, all this presented brilliantly. Kieslowski could tell the whole movie just by showing those images that I would love the film anyway. His direction of actors is very efficient too. To me, Olaf Lubaszenko will always be remembered by his portrayal of Tomek, wonderful job, he really felt the character, made him very believable and it's very difficult to resist to his charming puppy eyes. Grazyna Szapolowska is spectacular as well, she dominates the second half of the film in an astonishing way when her character realizes what Tomek really felt about her.

    Art in its best form, "A Short Film About Love" is highly recommended to everyone who enjoys great cinema and philosophical stories. This movie really is gonna make you to have a opinion about it, it will prevail in your memory. 10/10
  • The obscure object of Tomek's desire is always the same: the magical world of the attractive woman in the opposite palace, made of unadorned rooms and dreary meetings. The young busybody caught by the merciless camera in the act of scrutinizing the voluptuous, graceful shape of her scantily exposed human flesh feels a sensation of warmth in his heart, picturing to himself a dream world where the people can be embraced with the power of his piercing glance. His level of mental perception seems to grow exceedingly at the moment of penetrating the innermost recesses of Magda's intimacy, his recalcitrant flame of passion, his fickle, forbidden desire.

    But Tomek is not satisfied with the sight of her bare-legged beauty (opaque and unlikely reminiscence of the evangelic Mary Magdalene), he does not want to remain a passive onlooker. Like a capricious and authoritarian "Demiurge" he devises disturbing situations by means of the phone in order to claim the exclusiveness of his prey, running the risk of being given a sound trashing. On account of his state of blind unconsciousness, he runs on burning coals, aflame with curiosity and passion, almost paying heavy tribute to arbitrary flights of fantasy.

    The movie is an extended version of "Dekalog 6", (Thou shalt not commit adultery), with a different epilogue. It gives us a good reason to get to the heart of Kieslowski's art of poetry and to relive the emotions of an ambiguous and poignant story, probably the most licentious of the whole Decalogue, a ruthless description of an insatiable desire for possession, caused by a mind deviating from the straight path. A piece of work made of immoral ambiguity and irresponsible premeditation. A dangerous midsummer night's dream carried out awkwardly, fated to rush headlong into an open conflict with a pitiless reality without finding a way of escape.
  • As said in my review of 'A Short Film About Killing', the more work I see of Krzysztof Kieslowski, the stronger the feeling that he was an incredibly gifted director, responsible for some brilliant work, taken from us too soon.

    Have yet to see anything bad from him, with even my least favourite (the eighth episode of 'Dekalog') still being very good, with the masterful 'Dekalog' and 'Three Colors: Red' (all three "Three Colors" films are must watches, but especially 'Red') being particularly great. Like 'A Short Film About Killing' was an expansion of Episode 5 of 'Dekalog', 'A Short Film About Love' is an expanded feature length version of Episode 6 (to me like Episode 5 one of the best 'Dekalog' episodes).

    Granted, 'A Short Film About Love' is not for everybody and it is easy to understand why. It seems to have been mistaken for a depressing take on romantic love, to me while there is love and passion (being two of the main themes of Episode 6 of 'Dekalog') it is a more complex and darker interpretation of "love" but is actually much more than that. Often it is more a film about obsession, forgiveness, lust and heartache. People may easily dismiss 'A Short Film About Love' as pessimistic and dispassionate, perverted has even been used, while others find it beautiful, haunting and moving. Belong in the latter category myself.

    Kieslowski's films are all visually striking and exceptionally well made. The same can be said for 'A Short Film About Love'. As well as being beautifully shot with atmospheric use of colour to match the mood, it is gritty yet beautiful with many thoughtful and emotionally powerful images lingering long into the memory. Kieslowski's direction is quietly unobtrusive, intelligently paced and never too heavy, and the music is suitably intricate.

    The themes and ideals are used to full potential, and the characters and their relationships and conflicts feel so real and emotionally resonant without being heavy-handed. Despite being based around one of the ten commandments, don't let that put you off, resemblance to religion is relatively scant, unless anybody argues God's seeming love for sinners. Being a non-religious person that's not for me to say, just mentioning an interesting and quite unusual observation read recently about the film.

    Story-wise, it's deliberate in pace but rich and provocative. It's never dull, and more often than not it's creepy (like Magda being followed out of the post-office), poignant (Tomek on the roof, Magda in tears after knocking over milk and the heart-wrenching fantasy about what life might have been with him). There is even some nice black humour that is so subtle it's easy to miss.

    'A Short Film About Love's' themes of obsession, stalking, lust, love, passion, forgiveness and heartache are expertly explored, likewise with the characterisations and interactions. The acting is superb as to be expected from both the two leads, again the complexity and nuances of the performances is to be admired.

    Overall, another masterpiece from Kieslowski though one of his most divisive. 10/10 Bethany Cox
  • That girl wished to gave him sexual experience but she learned what is love. The boy was looking for true love. This movie differentiate love and sex very well. I am left with no words, just watch it, you will feel it.
  • ragingbull_200525 December 2012
    This is a movie which will blow you away. Period. It doesn't matter whether you are a romantic or a skeptic. This will tear you asunder with its powerful characters and raw emotions.

    Tomek is a boy in his late teens who spies on his neighbor, Magda, with the help of his binoculars. He watches her through love making sessions and heartbreaks. One day he tells her about his voyeurism. What happens next is what the movie is all about.

    I chose this movie because I wanted to watch something short in length and this, at just 80 minutes of run time, qualified easily. However, despite fantastic reviews on the net I was not prepared for the sheer emotional power it unleashed.

    The way the feelings of Tomek and the object of his desire, Magda, are portrayed is masterly to use a clichéd term. The direction by Kieslowski is absolutely God level. The dialogues are kept to a minimum. Kieslowski allows the camera to do the talking. The acting is as natural as they come.

    I have seen only one other movie by the director which was White, one of the troika in the tri-color trilogy. I plan to check them all out ASAP now.

    This is what movie watchers talk off when they say that cinema can be pure magic.

    P.S. some of the scenes were copied by that horrific Hindi movie "Ek Choti si Love Story". Another reason for me never to forgive Mr. Mahesh Bhatt and his acolytes.
  • Insane_Man4 January 2021
    Overrated and silly. It is considering a masterpiece by the IMDb reviews and ratings. But in my opinion, it's overrated because of its silly storytelling. The main protagonist man did a very well performance. Very well. Except for this, there is nothing special.

    A boy peeps at a woman aged than him. He tries hard to meet her in any way. However, he meets her, and an unexpected turn of the story which leads to an unclear tragedy or may be, not a tragedy, nobody knows.

    Except for the way it ends, it deserves 7, not more than this.
  • Tomek, a mere boy staying with an old woman, whiles away his time watching an artist, a woman, senior to him as regards her age, staying at the apartment just across the street. He tries to scale the wall of viewability & meet her in person in various ways. His success in this regard brings with it an array of emotionally charged-up incidents that leave both the lover & the loved chastened in several ways; even they transpose their positions unwittingly. What comes to the fore are several issues, not to be mistaken as messages, concerning love - both sensual & sensuous - & attraction & loneliness & rightness & wrong et al that are found while browsing though the pages of a heart that's in love. The reflection of the 'Decalogue' is clearly palpable in this long-lurking 'A Short Film About Love', though raised in height than the aforesaid. Precise use of light transfuses into the mood & the silently stealthy aura of the film.
  • For someone used by Hollywood to romantic films being comedies, this could be a hard one to swallow. In a way, yes, it is a drama, but no more than any other strong love is. The movie attacks directly the strongest feelings anyone has ever had: the first love. Since the main character is an introverted 19 year old, the power of his inner love can only be hinted at. But one gets the picture.

    The story is irrelevant, in itself, the lead idea is that someone can identify one's life and reason to live with a feeling that isn't even shared. The interaction between the love sick and his target is only a small ploy to make us understand the things that go on inside the man.

    All in all I've seen better movies than this, having stronger messages. Wicker Park, for example, is a fairly recent US movie that captures in a more alert, yet implausible way the same feelings of obsession. Is that the truest love, or is it just a Chimera, making people chase their own tail in the illusion that they have a real feeling? I think there are few movies that explore this issue, this being one of them. Be prepared for a rather depressing view on the matter.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The screenplay is written from the pov of a twenty-something, overly-sensitive boy/man who sometimes succumbs to masochistic tendencies. And written for same. Story is about an average looking, withdrawn, personality-less 19 year old male who obsessively voyeuristically watches an attractive, mature and sexy woman in various stages of undress and in various sexual positions with a boyfriend. Thwock, thwock, thwock. In a not-to-be-believed circumstance (well, it IS his fantasy after all!) young man gets physically close to the woman, has his hands moving up her bare thighs.....but before he gets to the prize......has a premature orgasm. Thwock, thwock, thwock, thwock. Neatly and virtually painlessly punishes himself for this by cutting both wrists with a flimsy double-edged shaving blade (more self-inflicted pain but photographed in a beautiful, melodramatic, theatrical way). (Cue violins.) Survives the attempt and then rejects the she-devil he so previously desired. (In an interview on the disc the actress tells how the original ending had the kid coldly repudiate the woman. Very telling this ending because, you see, he triumphs over her and "that'll show you, now that you're interested in little old boring me! Or as Groucho said, "I wouldn't join any club that would have me as a member!) Climax!
An error has occured. Please try again.