User Reviews (157)

Add a Review

  • After an encounter with a neck-biter, a publishing executive (Nicolas Cage) thinks that he is turning into a vampire.

    Okay, looking back from 2015, Nicolas Cage has had one of the most unusual careers in Hollywood. We know he can be a great actor, because we have seen "Adaptation", "Leaving Las Vegas" and others where he just stunned audiences with his portrayals. But we also know he has a habit of picking duds, and at this point he probably has more stinkers than winners.

    And then there is "Vampire's Kiss", which is a bizarre blend of horror and comedy. It is never quite horror and never quite comedy, sort of existed in this world of nothing... and that just makes it more interesting. That weird accent (somewhere between rich guy and surfer dude). Wow.
  • There has never quite been a film like Vampire's Kiss, and there has not even been an imitator since. It is an absurd, hilarious semi- spoof of all things horror, whilst also being a surreal and powerful delve into the damaged psych of horrid human being. I honestly feel I need to break this down in pieces.

    The elephant in the room is Nick Cage. His performance is excellent, but takes getting used to. He is hilariously over the top, moving like Max Schrek on Caffine pills. He talks in a petulant and whiny 'vaguely British' voice, also leading to some really goofy line readings. However despite this camp factor, there is depth here. Cage is also believable here, he stays perfectly true to the character throughout and forms a unique identity that can only be found here. It reminds me of Christian Bale in 'American Psycho', which is fitting as Bale based his performance off this film. One aspect I will bring up often here is thee film's re-watch value, suffice to say that Cage's performance changes and shifts upon numerous viewings.

    Next is the direction. It showcases some great shots of New York, almost making it feel alive. The cinematography highlights the striking architecture and uneven lighting of the city, almost showing it to be a real life translation of classic horror settings. However it also shows the clinical detachment of such a large city, and the Yuppie culture that has grown from it. The other performances match this films dual nature also, taking classic horror roles at times, and being typical Yuppie's at others.

    Night and Day, Gothic and Modern, Deep and Funny, Dark and Light. This film performs an entirely unique juggling act that has never been matched since. Both a homage to classic horror tales, and a deconstruction of the 80's Yuppie lifestyle.
  • CommieTT12 April 2000
    Nicholas Cage is a terrific actor, and I have enjoyed his work in all the movies I've seen him in. That said, he does an outstanding job holding one's attention throughout this movie.

    Nonetheless, this isn't a great movie. It goes in a few too many directions for it to remain coherent. It offends too many senses for it to be a good a comedy, and provides too few scares as a horror film.

    One highlight, as others have mentioned, is with the fake vampire teeth. But the best part to that bit was the fact that he had to settle for the CHEAP teeth, because he didn't have $20 for the good ones! That really made me laugh!

    My rating: 6
  • Okay, so Nicolas Cage eats a real cockroach. So the majority of the people who've seen this film don't understand the plotline. So black comedy is new to a late eighties audience. These points are minimal considering the great lengths to which the filmmakers go to to reveal the downfall of a hideous relationship between two people. A relationship gone so wrong that the male has to commit himself to therapy and conversely...murder.

    Imagine a relationship wherein the woman was so soul sucking, so evil in her ways that you now feel as if she has sucked you dry - literally and figuratively - you are left as nothing but (in this case) a shell of a man - a walking corpse, yearning for the life's blood that she has stolen from you through your very own veins!

    Cage gives the performance of his career and should have received an Oscar as the twisted, quintessential jilted lover who now desperately tries to recapture the joy of his most passionate and influential relationship by revisiting the empty, vampiretic bar hopping lifestyle where he found her - working his way through subsequent women, then just as unsatisfactorily moving his way through rape, suicidal tendencies and ultimately, murder.

    It's tone is unforgiving alternating comedy and tragedy, confusing us as to whether he is really a vampire or just thinks he is. By flipping from his therapeutic sessions to his bitter and pathetic reality we see just how badly his male ego has taken rejection.

    Here is a film where the simple plotline of a man being bitten by a vampire and believing he has become one becomes one where we see a man disintegrating before us, sliding into madness because he is forced to face his empty life.

    His obsessive attention to detail, penchant for house bugs, absence of reflection in the mirror and avoidance of sunlight all match the prerequisites for vampirism, but his clumsy attempts at finding another woman and to fill the void that is left by a woman put so far onto a pedestal he cannot reach are overshadowed.

    This is not a film for the feint of heart but for anyone who has ever been screwed over by a woman they have loved (or imagined they did) this is a welcome little cult revelation that makes them laugh and brood at the same time.
  • I wouldn't go so far as to say this movie is nothing without Nicolas Cage, but I would say his performance makes the movie. The internet makes fun of Cage's overacting and unhinged personality, but in this movie I think it really works. Cage plays a guy who's already a bit off the wall, and a vampire chick bites him which leads to uncontrollable bouts of crazier and crazier behavior. The way she chameleons herself, the way Cage responds, it works with the metaphors it implies such as cycles of abuse and hollow relationships. Cage's increasing desperation unironically works emotionally, and you feel sorry for the guy. His performance carries the whole movie. I don't think this film would be fondly remembered if there was a different actor in the leading role, since everything else about the presentation is pretty forgettable. While nothing about it is outright bad, Nick Cage is the only truly standout part to me.
  • Undead (in the sense of lifeless but still in motion) is the perfect word to describe this lame-brained would-be comedy, memorable only for the out-of-control, over-the-top emoting by Nicholas Cage as an upscale New York City literary agent who imagines himself becoming a creature of the night after some rough sex with Jennifer Beals. Seventy-five minutes later, after throwing several tantrums, brutally raping his secretary, and killing another girl in a misfired attempt to drink her blood, it's finally suggested that his vampire fixation is just a paranoid, misogynist fantasy, and Beals was only another heartless bitch with a taste for S&M. Writer Joseph Minion has an obvious chip on his shoulder, and director Robert Bierman never manages to locate the right tone, allowing his star to indulge himself in a performance of almost compelling badness. What Cage does here can hardly be called acting: he's merely killing time (and with good reason), stumbling headlong through each scene like a narcoleptic bull in a cheap china shop.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Off the wall black comedy about Peter Loew (Nicolas Cage), a literary agent in NYC. Peter, dissatisfied with the nature of his life, has an encounter with a one night stand, Rachel (Jennifer Beals). She bites him on the neck, and the increasingly unstable Peter believes that she is a vampire and just turned him into one. He makes life absolutely miserable for his flustered secretary Alva (Maria Conchita Alonso), while going about doing what he thinks a vampire's gotta do.

    Joseph Minion ("After Hours") wrote the screenplay for this movie that, if nothing else, will go down in history for Cages' performance. We've seen him be prone to shameless overacting, but here his eccentricities reach one of their peaks (see also "Deadfall"). As other reviews have stated, though, there is more going on here than meets the eye; the movie isn't really to be taken literally. Yes, there's violence (the gore is courtesy of Ed French), and a few pointed teeth, but it's not too hard to reason that Peter is really manufacturing all of these nightmare scenarios in his head. A rather uncomfortable bit of business with Peters' office harassment of his poor secretary forms the major subplot.

    Cage really is something to see, as he overturns his sofa, crawls beneath it, and turns it into a makeshift "coffin", shuns the sunlight, and is forced to buy ultra cheap plastic fangs. He's rarely been THIS unrestrained. He even affects a light, posh accent at times that is just downright silly. The supporting cast is fine (Elizabeth Ashley plays Peters' psychiatrist, Kasi Lemmons a potential girlfriend), and the ladies are all tantalizingly sexy. Now familiar faces like John Michael Higgins and David Hyde Pierce have small roles. The filmmaking isn't especially stylish but it's competent enough. (The photography is just gorgeous at times.)

    "Vampire's Kiss" does generate some modest chuckles. It's kind of tough going at times, and really should have been shorter, but it makes for some decent entertainment.

    Six out of 10.
  • I still can't believe Nicolas Cage believes this to be one of his best films. This would normally be the type of movie an actor would cross off his resume. Cage doesn't do many DVD commentaries, yet he chose to do one for this obscure dark comedy. His commentary with the director was definitely amusing, and made the film more fun to watch, but I'm here to rate the movie and not the commentary. The movie is totally confusing, as it keep jumping back and forth from one reality to another. Finally, I understood that it was about Cage going insane and thinking he's a vampire. Confusing or not, "Vampire's Kiss" is painful to watch. It contains almost no plot, and it's no more than a one-man show for Nick Cage, who gives an outrageously hammy performance. And yes, I'm saying that as a huge Nick Cage fan. Sure, he has a reputation for being over-the-top, but usually it makes sense within his character and rarely does he get to the point where he's a live-action cartoon character. In this case, he's a total cartoon, mugging at any possible opportunity and donning an annoying accent (kind of like his dumb accent in "Peggy Sue Got Married"). Jennifer Beals is wasted in a small, degrading role. And Kasi Lemmons really should stick to directing. A must-miss!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    VERY BIG SPOILERS!!! YOU'VE BEEN WARNED!!! I explain the entire film here, so if you don't want to have it explained, read no further!!

    I did receive an e-mail from the screenwriter of this film, thanking me for understanding his movie after I posted this comment on Amazon years ago. I really think it's an underrated film that people misunderstand and everyone can relate to on some level.

    Vampire's Kiss" is an overlooked and misunderstood dark comedy, and an allegory for the isolating fear of intimacy that can mimic being "undead." It features an amazing physical comic performance by Nicholas Cage as Peter Loew, which deserves recognition. I've read reviews wherein people feel that the character of Peter Loew has descended into madness as a result of being a jilted lover. But his madness is more about his crushing loneliness in a world where everyone around him seems to be happily and easily paired off. In spite of his solitude, he is emotionally unable to connect to anyone.

    One night, he brings a woman back to his place, but while in the throes of passion, a bat flies into his apartment through an open window. The mystery and excitement of fighting off the bat becomes more erotic and interesting to him than the willing beauty in arms.

    Terrified of the closeness he craves, he sabotages any opportunities he has for actual relationships in favor of elusive fantasies and hallucinations. His fear of commitment manifests itself as a vampire lover in the form of Rachel (Jennifer Beales), a woman he has had one conversation with in a bar, but has never made it with, except in his own fantasy world. There, she is a dominatrix of a vampire, sucking the life out of him, making him a prisoner of her demands, hungers, and lusts, distracting and preventing him from any real intimacy, promising him that soon, he will "be with her."

    The vampire is the only one to whom he can say "I love you," and she doesn't even exist--not really. She represents the promise of something more exciting right around the next corner. Peter simply cannot commit to anything else when love and immortality are so close, but so far...

    Vampires seem human, but they aren't human; they FEED ON humans. They're dead, cold, and isolated from the warmth of human existence--which is exactly how Peter feels, and why he believes he's becoming one. Plus, he is suicidal, and he seems to have found a way to receive deliverance in the form of his secretary Alva, who he begins to torment in earnest once he discovers she carries a gun, hoping she'll (justifiably) use it on him.

    It's over the top and a little hard to understand, but I found this movie so engaging, and Cage's performance so funny and astonishing, in spite of the dark subject matter, that I have watched it over and over again. I have used this movie as a compatibility test for potential mates (which is sort of Peter-ish, I guess), and if they like it, I know it's a good match. If it had been performed another way, by another actor, I don't know if I would like it at all. But Cage brings brutality, vulnerability, tragedy, and all-out desperation together to create a complex character the like of which I have never seen before or since.

    Sure, there are violent scenes; but are they real, or are they his imagination? We'll never know. So much of "Vampire's Kiss" happens in Loew's mind that all we know for sure is that he's desperately alone. So alone, he's willing to drive someone else over the edge to help ease his pain. He's so cowardly and childish that he uses terror as a way to achieve relief from his horrible solitude--death is less frightening to him than actually getting close to a real person. Therein lies the horror, and the sadness, of "Vampire's Kiss." And in Cage, lies the performance which makes this story watchable, and actually very funny.
  • A man decends into madness. His madness distorts his reality to where he believes he is becoming a vampire. Not a vampire movie. Not really a dark comedy either. Cage did a great job but his accent was really bad. I felt at times his character was really cruel and there was no dark fun side to laugh at.

    However, I gave it high marks because it was different and put a new twist on the whole madness thing. The acting (except for the accent) was good. My wife hated this one.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I came on here expecting the film to be blasted by a movie going audience I normally agree with, to find this movie rated at a whopping 5.1/10.

    I watched this movie with a bunch of Nicholas Cage fans, none of which has seen this movie yet (myself included). The entire time, we sat there in disbelief as a poor plot unraveled, acted out by a Keanu Reeves (Bill and Ted era) voiced Nic Cage. Some moments, like Cage running down the street screaming, "I'M A VAMPIRE, I'M A VAMPIRE!!" or him catching and eating a pigeon had us questioning whether or not this movie was seriously released, and whether or not it was supposed to be taking itself seriously.

    If you want to laugh at a now professional actor doing dumb things in a slow paced plot with random and confusing things happening in the background of every scene, make sure to watch Vampire's Kiss.

    Also, take a minute to laugh at how funny Cage's hair is in this movie. Because it's hilarious.
  • pisces-614 August 2000
    After reading so many comments who put this film down, I just had to write something to its defence. True: the film is confusing in many ways; you get confused what is real and what is not for example. But some of the hilarious scenes in this movie is more than worth it. In one of his most remarkable, over-the-top performances, Nicolas Cage transforms from an up-tight snob to a complete lunatic. This is one of the most original and unconventional movies I have ever seen. Those of you who want predictable Hollywood movies should steer away; for the rest of you this can be an enjoyable experience!
  • sol121827 September 2008
    ***SPOILER ALERT*** Obnoxious and so full of himself yuppie literary agent Peter Lowe, Nicolas Cage, gets all that's coming to him in this both hilarious and tragic back comedy about vampires and abusive and manic depressive personality's in New York City circa 1989.

    Not being wrapped too tight to begin with Peter after standing up his girlfriend Jackie, Kasi Lemmons, lets his both hair and guard down when he goes out to dance the night away at a Manhattan disco club. It just happens that Peter meets this really hot and sexy chick Rachel, Jennifer Beals, who before he can evaluate the situation, in why Rachel is so hung up on him, the two end up in bed together in his East 19th Street, what's known as Yuppieville, Manhattan bachelor pad. During a night of hot and heavy action Rachel puts the hurt, or bite, on an unsuspecting Peter that would later drive the confused young man to the brink of insanity and beyond.

    Peter soon starts to feel that he's been turned into a blood-sucking vampire by Rachael and starts to act accordingly. It's also during that time in Peter's work as a literary agent that he starts to take his fears and frustrations out at his loyal and hard working secretary Alva, Maria Conchita Alonso. Being the arrogant and uncouth lout that he is Peter drives the poor secretary almost to a nervous breakdown in finding this obscure short story title "Rattlesnake Hills". The missing and very "important" short story is in fact of no importance to anyone! Even the person, or client, whom a very concerned Peter claims so desperately wants it. Peter uses it all throughout the movie to harass and browbeat Alva to the point where she can't come to work anymore!

    As Peter becomes more and more erratic he seeks help from his psychiatrist Dr. Glaser, Elizabeth Ashley, who in thinking that he's just oversexed and suffering from burn out completely overlooks the danger signs that he's giving off. Without help Peter disintegrates into his own personal hell mimicking a real life, or fictional, vampire. Peter goes so far as both eating live roaches and pigeons as well as murdering a women who foolishly at first lets him fondle her and then rejects his advances.

    It's Peter's abuse of poor Alva that in fact leads to his end with her car mechanic brother Emilio, Bob Lujan, coming to her aid. By then Peter was so screwed up and suicidal that a shocked Emilio, in seeing the total dump that Peter lived in, didn't need to do that much to do him it. In fact it was Peter himself who more then aided Emilio in putting himself out of his own misery.

    One of Nicolas Cage's best and at the same time most underrated performance. Despite the movies black comedy theme Peter was a man suffering from real and severe mental problems that drove him to both murder and suicide. It was really cruel and very unprofessional, as she liked to claim that she is, for Peter's psychiatrist Dr. Glaser to break up and laugh at his pressing problems that in fact tipped Peter over the edge. Dr. Glaser was the only hope, or life line, that Peter had left ad she failed him with flying colors.
  • rbononno14 April 2003
    Nicolas Cage is an interesting actor, but this is not one of his finest moments, or rather, he's the only interesting aspect of an otherwise forgettable movie--interesting because his performance is so over-the-top. The film is neither "stylish," nor "erotic," nor funny (well, the fake teeth scene is funny for a while). The plot is ludicrous and disjointed and the film can't seem to decide it it wants to be comedy, horror, or drama. This isn't a conventional vampire film in any sense of the word, aside from the silly bat at the beginning of the movie and Jennifer Beals as a "real" vampire (the character Rachel). Since Cage's character is in therapy and obviously quite disturbed, one of the underlying plot threads is that his behavior is really the result of a paranoid mind--that is, he is not, nor has he ever been, a vampire. Oh well. Fortunately Cage went on to make some interesting films with better direction and comprehensible plots.

    Even though I do like vampire films as a genre, this was one of the worst I've seen.
  • This was one of the first 5 DVDs a friend of mine bought, and so I was curious about his choice. It turns out that the things he chooses may not be perfect, but are invariably very interesting, as it turned out with this one. The only thing I knew about this movie beforehand was that it's supposed to be a 'comedy,' and that Nicholas Cage eats a cockroach in it. So it was hard for me to understand why someone would be so passionate about what seemed like a goofy 80s comedy, but it turns out that this film is much more than that.

    The opening photography is wonderful, silhouetted spires and Gothic details of Manhattan, that seem to reveal the city as a place of dark supernatural horrors within the regular city we know, which was a great start.

    You're read in other reviews that this is a film about a man going crazy, and that his insanity takes of the form of believing that he's a vampire. What I haven't heard anyone talk about is the place that his misogyny plays in that… he's lonely and isolated and sees women as objects, so as he goes insane he thinks he's a vampire, someone who picks up young women, rapes and kills them… and is cursed by this. In this movie, Nic cage HATES women, and a lot of discomfort comes from how horrible he is to them. I thought it was also ingenious how his therapist, the imaginary vampire woman, the woman he jilts near the beginning, and his secretary all look vaguely alike. The director could easily have thrown in a bit of psychoanalytic depth by having a photo of the character's mother looking similar as well.

    There are things in this movie that are vaguely funny on their own, but in the context of the movie it's not really funny at all. I mean yeah, people do goofy things as they are mentally breaking apart, but is that funny? All the actors do a great job, but I love the therapist, who seems so engaged and curious. I like how Cage's character assumes the movements of movie vampires, because in his lunacy that is probably what he is imitating.

    There are only two problems I think the film has. The film goes out of its way to show how Alva, the abused secretary, needs her job and is not supported by her family, but Cage's behavior is SO over the top ANYONE would know that she has a lot of reason to go to the police. That she remains so passive is a little frustrating and unrealistic to the point where it detracts from the film.

    The big problem, I think, is that ramping up so quickly to high insanity in the first hour, there's really nowhere for the film to go in it's last 45 minutes. The scenes of cage humiliating his secretary become repetitive, as do other aspects… but overall definitely worth watching.

    I was shocked to learn that this was the director's first full feature, as it is very assured and well-done. I would love to have a chat with the writer to know HOW this idea came to him and what he thought about it. That's it.

    --- Check out my website devoted to bad and cheesy movies at: www.cinemademerde.com
  • The_Triad26 May 2006
    What do we have here then? A vampire film is it? NO! Well, not really anyway. Vampire's Kiss stars Nicolas Cage as a publishing executive who believes that he is turning into a vampire. What makes the film is Cage's incredibly camp, over the top, performance. A pre-Jim Carrey Jim Carrey role that he really grabs by the horns. We follow his character Peter Loew, as he obsesses about a vampire biting him, and proceeds to destroy his attempts at a relationship and terrorise (for seemingly no other reason than fun) his secretary. Whether you like this film or not depends on how dark you like your humour, and if you get the joke. There are too many great moments to point out, this is a great film to watch, with a "what is this crazy guy going to do next?" thing going on, all resulting in something very funny.
  • Nicholas Cage is a publishing executive who is supposedly allegedly bitten by a vampire bat, after which he starts behaving erratically, such as sleeping in a makeshift coffin-made from a living room sofa, and being a real a****** to his secretary. Billed as a horror/comedy, it can't seem to make up its mind what it is and fails as a horror or a comedy. After seeing this one for the first (and last) time I felt like putting on any of the Universal Classic Horrors, such as HOUSE OF DRACULA in order to fumigate my mind from this wretched viewing experience.

    Rating: 0 stars out of *****
  • By the end of this film, you realise that the only way it possibly makes sense as a script is if it's supposed to be a horror in the classic sebse about a man's psychological breakdown and wilful self destruction. On the way, the comedic moments that seem like cheap gags suddenly seem like very black comedy.

    But that doesn't make it a good film. For this kind of psychological study to be anything other than cheap voyeurism for the audience, you have to establish the situation that is the starting point for the descent and what the triggers are. It felt like there was no effective exposition of why he might be heading on this downhill trajectory. Sure, he was seeing a shrink but doesn't everyone?

    Ultimately it's a film with an original concept, but incomplete and messy in its execution.
  • To start this critique off on a good note, let me just say that in the years since the making of Vampire's Kiss, Nicolas Cage has certainly improved upon his acting skills. Although this film has been classified as a comedy/horror movie, it is neither. To think that mental illness and hallucinations in the form that is portrayed in the film is comedic, is absurd. The script was not only violent, but extremely tasteless and the acting...well, to put it bluntly...there was none! It appeared as if Cage and Beals were doing exercises from acting class, and not very good ones at that. Sitting through this film was almost as uncomfortable as sitting in a 120 degree sauna for two hours without the aid of wet towels...it sucks! This film needs more than a wooden stake to kill it, it needs to be burned as well.
  • This movie is NOT about vampires; there isn't a single vampire in it. Instead, it is about a man (played by Cage) who loses his mind and begins to think he is a vampire after an unsatisfying series of one-night stands that make him feel empty. It's a metaphor about relationships, and this is one fantastic black comedy. Check it out and thank me later.
  • Cage was amazingly creepy and funny in this movie. Some iconic moments in this movie. The plot twist at the end was great.
  • Nicholas Cage's performance in this movie is B rated at the best, but closer to a D. The fake accent, the terrible fake laughter, this is one of the worst movies I've ever seen. The story line is basically non existent and the foul language makes it hard to watch because it feels forced.

    Not impressed at all!!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Wow..All I have to say is wow, pure Cage gold. I never ever ever take Nick Cage seriously so that might be why I enjoyed this movie so much, but he really needs to only be in movies like this once every 4-5 years as to not let us get used to it. Seriously Cage has been doing it all wrong all these years and needs to learn from his 1988 self. I am convinced that nobody could have performed in this role better.

    I love the campy 80's vibe and music and clothing, but that's only the beginning of the entertainment. Cage essentially plays the same general character as Christian Bale in American Psycho (which was inspired by this movie FYI, look at the Trivia section) - a fairly well-off businessman who is slowly losing his mind. That is literally the whole plot. Again why this movie is solid gold.

    This is not a vampire movie. It took me almost the entirety of the movie to realize that fact, and some people who gave it poor ratings probably didn't come to that realization. Cage is dissatisfied with his lifestyle of going out and sleeping with different women every night, so he just cracks. That is what Cage does best. This movie has some of my favorite Cage-isms that I didn't know were in this movie.

    1. Nicholas Cage creepy face meme 2. "Well, I was really horny at the time." 3. "Am I getting through to you, Alva?" 4. "A! B! C! D! E! F! G!...etc" 5. The famous "I'm a Vampire! I'm a Vampire!"

    I could literally write about this movie all day, it excites me way too much. It is just so ridiculous but maintains its composure and brilliance in doing so. Get through the opening 30 minutes or so and prepare for a Cage experience that you'd never expect.

    Also what the f kind of accent does he have?
  • Vampire's Kiss (1988) is a movie that I recently rewatched for the first time in a long time on Tubi. The storyline follows a young business executive who encounters a gorgeous woman that turns him into a vampire. He tries to balance his normal life and new vampire lifestyle, but he discovers he's mean and ruthless as a vampire and starts alienating his family and friends. Can he balance his two lives or will one destroy the other?

    This movie is directed by Robert Bierman (Apology) and stars Nicolas Cage (Face/Off), Jennifer Beals (Flashdance), Maria Conchita Alonso (The Running Man), David Hyde Pierce(Frasier) and Elizabeth Ashley (Happiness).

    This is a picture with a clever and unique storyline and well written dialogue, characters and circumstances. The acting by Cage is excellent for a horror comedy and Maria Conchita Alonso does a great job of making you feel sorry for her the entire film. Beals is a great villainous character and Cage does a great job of making you root for him to get it right despite being a jerk the entire movie. There's fun twists and turns, splashes of cheesy comedy and an ending that is a bit of a surprise.

    Overall, this is a clever horror comedy that's entertaining and worth a viewing. I would score this a 6.5-7/10 and recommend seeing it once.
  • I don't know how an actor as talented as Nicholas Cage ever got through the Hollywood machine by doing garbage like this film. Seeing him in this movie I would have never thought he would have amounted to anything. Not only was the story absolutely stupid, but Cage's performance is bordering on unwatchable. The only thing that kept me watching was my fascination with how bad he was. I don't know what kind of an accent he was trying to pull off but it was ridiculous. There isn't much I can say about this movie except don't bother watching it. I thought it was going to be mildly amusing, it wasn't even that.
An error has occured. Please try again.