Add a Review

  • Geez, it looks like someone's really easily impressed. While given that this movie certainly deserves a higher rating than 4.5 (probably about a 6) it is certainly nowhere near being the best film ever.

    Danson, Selleck and Guttenberg are great together and the supporting cast is good too. There is one classic moment (because it is so accurate) of a farmer giving the three men directions on how to get to a church as he describes in painstaking detail the road that they should avoid taking. As with most comedies some of the jokes just don't work at all. This doesn't make it a poor comedy, this just stops it from being a above average one.

    This film is a solid piece of feel good cinema with great casting (though not neccessarily a great cast) and I can only assume people rate films on a different scale to me.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This expected sequel is a change in comic direction from the first film, although its not enough to bring "Little Lady" up to the standard of '87's big hit.

    Baby 'Mary' has grown up now, and at five years old she's about to start school. However the story revolves this time around her mom, who is looking for the ideal husband and father to marry. 'Peter' (Tom Selleck) hopes it will be him, but he can't bring himself to tell her so.

    The new format, romantic comedy, brings fewer laughs and fast becomes quite predictable. None of the lead players do much, and if not for Fiona Shaw, who delivers some hilarious scenes as headmistress Elspeth Lomax, "Three Men and a Little Lady" would not have been much at all.

    Sunday, February 21, 1993 - T.V.
  • Mary is now 5. She and her mother Sylvia Bennington (Nancy Travis) have ingrained themselves into the lives of Peter Mitchell (Tom Selleck), Michael Kellam (Steve Guttenberg), and Jack Holden (Ted Danson). The five of them have become an unique family. Baby daddy Jack continues to be irresponsible while Peter is falling for Sylvia. Then she announces that she's marrying Edward Hargreave and moving to England.

    The comedy is not that funny. It feels especially sitcomy. It isn't fresh anymore. There is a compelling romance rising out of the ashes. The guys remain likable. Sylvia has a central role this time around along with little girl Mary. It's a secondary sequel and not quite that good.
  • I don't honestly understand why this film was panned so severely! It may not be a masterpiece as such but it certainly was worth the time of day.

    And for the people that are getting so serious about the England v. America thing: I'm English too and happen to find the stereotypes displayed in this film hilarious. It isn't meant as a direct offence, but merely light hearted fun.

    Also the "3 men" are fantastic again in their roles. Nancy Travis does a great job and has more chance in this film to show what she's got! Christopher Cazenove does a great job of being completely unlikeable and Fiona Shaw is AMAZING!

    A great film and to anyone who hasen't watched it already - please do! You won't regret it.
  • With the exception of The Godfather (which failed us the third time round) what sequels have EVER been any good? Very few if any. This is no exception. A watered down version of the first one, made to keep the franchise going I'd guess, this is just okay. Probably best seen with the first one, right after it. The English cliches are a bit thick, but all the performers are amiable. Why didn't they just make this into a television series?
  • skad1314 August 1999
    I don't know why this one was so trashed by the critics. It's not a masterpiece but hardly as bad as indicated by the drubbing it got. It has what I thought what the best movie scene of its year, where Tom Selleck is talking to the little girl about his departure. He talks to her so intelligently, just the way a smart person would talk to a smart child. After that, I was willing to forgive an awful lot (and admittedly, there's an awful lot to forgive
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Complete with Ealing Comedy characters who last saw the light in 1950. And all so's we can make a few more bucks from our 3 "Creatives" ,this time as fishes out of water in the bucolic English countyside. We have Boarding Schools with Joyce Grenfell - like mistresses,bristling with hockeysticks and blackboard dusters,senile butlers like just about every film featuring a Country House,and a villainous would - be husband,beautifully spoken but rotten to the core. - like all aristos are of course. The "Boys" fly to England to prevent the mother of the now rather older "Baby" from marrying her Theatre - Director fiancée who is a thoroughly nasty piece of work. Tom Selleck(moustache as doleful as ever)decides he is in love with her. Ted Danson - in one of the most excruciatingly embarrassing scenes I have ever sat through - (only watchable through clenched fingers) does a turn(well,he is supposed to be an actor - don't call us Ted - we'll call you) where he pretends to be a senile vicar.You need to know no more. If things turn out real bad for the studio we may - 27 years on see "Three Pensioners and the feminist Vlogger". Never say never.
  • manitobaman8119 August 2014
    7/10
    Good
    I thought this was cute and not bad at all. Filled with charm, innocence, drama and romance. I thought it was a nice mix. From an artistic standpoint, there were some plot elements and character developments I didn't think were totally needed. They do however drive the story, which seemed to be their purpose, so I can accept them. It is an emotionally uplifting movie that will raise your morale. Unfairly dismissed by some as confusing, this kind of sentimental character piece needs a tight focus so all of the nuances of the characters shine through. Oh, and the colors are amazing and seem to follow the mood of the story.
  • I am really quite loathed to say anything at all about this film. I actually felt rather sick and extremely nauseated by it. I can't actually decide if this film is an outrageously poor attempt at humour or weather it is simply a prolonged attack against the people of Britain. Many American films are guilty of portraying the British as upper class morons, but this film really tries hard to make us look like the most idiotic, brain dead, arrogant, stuck up, pompous creatures that infest this planet. I don't know if the makers expected the film to go down very well on this side of the Atlantic, but I for one found it more than disagreeable. Apart from the obvious stereotyping of British people, this film is truly dreadful. A very poor sequel to a very poor original. I really can't say any more about it because thinking about it is bringing my nausea back on.
  • I haven't seen all of the first one but I thought the second one was great. It's filled with charm, innocence, drama, comedy, and romance and I thought it was a pretty nice mixture of them. 3 men and a little lady is about a little girl, Mary who is all grown up now and is still babysitted by three men. Once she discovers about going to England, it starts making her a little moved and isolated as well as her three most crucial companions but soon recalls her supernatural-ness to see her friends with closed eyes. I know that the first film seems a little like Baby Boom but both this and that were good films. I thought this one was cute and wasn't bad at all. Three men and a little lady is an emotionally uplifting movie that will raise your moral and spirited levels.
  • While not ever likely to be one of those rare sequels that's better than the original this film is likable enough fun, with the three male leads from the first one all returning for more comedic fare, only this time the baby's a bit older, and they're in jolly old England.

    It has it's moments, but in my opinion lacks a bit of the charm that made the original such a joy.

    I would be interested to see a third in the series if it ever got made.
  • After being only mildly entertained by the first movie, I was absolutely awestruck by this sequel. There are many hilarious scenes, a love story triangle, outstanding scenery of the English countryside, and outstanding acting by the big "3 Men". I would have to rate this one of my Top Ten movies of all time.

    This movie had no gaps or letdowns, and I could/can not stop watching it. I've easily seen it a dozen times or more, and just caught it again last week on Showtime.

    Let me cite some of the extraordinary scenes in this flick. The Rap song by the Big 3 (amazing!), the Big 3's kitchen scene regarding the discussion of possible suitors for Sylvia, the bachelor's swinging NYC party scene (Selleck's blonde was a major fox!) Fiona Shaw's pursuit of Tom Selleck in the Pileforth Academy, and the ending's madcap frenzy!

    What a movie!
  • Though no one would accuse this movie of being intellectually challenging, it is fun to watch and has some really funny scenes. The little girl who plays Mary was a great child actress -- I found her to be both adorable and convincing. The interactions between Sylvia, the three men, and the pompous English director she dates are amusing, if rather sitcom-ish.

    The English stereotypes are nothing new, and I used to live in England, but I was still amused. Probably because they were done in such a goofy, light-hearted spirit. Fiona Shaw is hysterical, too, as the headmistress of a girl's school who develops an excruciating crush on Tom Selleck's character.

    Definitely worth watching, and safe for little kids.
  • Take every stupid cliche Hollywood has ever produced to portray England and the English, throw in an irritating brat and 3 truly awful characterisations, and you've got this movie. Next to it, 3 Men and a Baby actually looks good. I watched the end of this film only to make sure it was as bad all the way through, and it sure was.
  • "Three Men & A Little Lady" puts you in the right mood. It becomes a sort of "addiction" once you've seen it. It portrays the typical American lifestyle, with a touch of English humor. An unusual plot makes it hard for you to get bored. The film's great share of actors captivate the viewer, and the lovely soundtrack adds delight to the ears. And I must say I haven't seen Fiona Shaw any funnier :)
  • "3 Men and a Baby" was one of the highest-grossing films of the 1980s and made Steve Guttenberg a star (yech) yet again. He gave a remarkable performance in Barry Levinson's "Diner" - then he resorted to kiddie trash like these films.

    If you liked the first, you'll probably like this. It's more of the same - three klutzes taking care of a baby (now a young girl) go through tough times trying to adjust. Here, they try to keep her mother away from marrying some bad evil guy. Woefully painful (and offensive) British stereotypes are made and the jokes are intolerable.

    This is one of the best cases of a franchise cash-in - a surprising little gem is found (albeit a pretty poor one) by audiences, makes millions of dollars, and studio bosses who didn't want to make the original in the first place jump on the bandwagon and start investing money into a sequel - which flops and ruins the reputation of the first. (Also see "Ocean's Twelve," which is currently receiving negative reviews and turning off fans of the original. Yikes!)
  • And unnecessary sequel to a great 80s family movie. It was inevitable that following the success of a "Three Men And A Baby" that a sequel would follow. It was also inevitable that the sequel would be of inferior quality.

    Plot In A Paragraph: The three men (Peter, Michael, and Jack) are back and are still living with Mary, who is now five, and her mother, Sylvia. The group is split up when Sylvia announces that she is marrying an Englishman and that they intend to move to England after the wedding, taking Mary with them.

    The first movie had plenty of laughs and charm, this one is almost laugh free, and is vastly inferior.

    Tom Selleck has a certain charm but he will always be a poor mans version of Burt Reynolds. Ted Danson plays Sam Malone (from Cheers) just with a different name, which is no bad thing as he brings the movies one funny line. When Peter (Selleck) is shooting down every potential husband for Sylvia, Jack snaps "Jesus Peter!! We're not asking you to marry him!!" And every time I see Steve Guttenberg I can't help but wonder what happened to him and his career.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I wasn't paying the fullest attention to the entirety of this sequel to the great original, from director Emile Ardolino (Dirty Dancing, Sister Act), but I certainly noticed it enough to realise it deserves the two star rating (out of five) from the critics. Basically Peter 'Pete' Mitchell (Tom Selleck), Michael 'Mike' Kellam (Steve Guttenberg) and Jack Holden (Ted Danson) are still living with Sylvia Bennington (Nancy Travis, with a little more believable English accent) and the daughter she and Jack had, now grown-up Mary (Robin Weisman). This story sees Sylvia's work making her move back to England, while Pete and Mike follow Jack is filming. The boys, especially Pete who eventually realises he loves Sylvia, are trying to make sure not only Mary has a good school, not boarding, and towards the end stop Sylvia's wedding to some bozo. Also starring Christopher Cazenove as Edward Hargreave, Sheila Hancock as Vera Bennington, Harry Potter's Fiona Shaw as Miss Elspeth Lomax, John Boswall as Barrow, Edward's Butler and Jonathan Lynn as Vicar Hewitt. To be honest, only the opening montage and music, and the only funny moment of the film when Jack is disguised with great make-up as a vicar, these are the only worthwhile parts. If you liked the first film, I would insist you don't bother with this nonsense, a terrible comedy sequel. Pretty poor!
  • This is one of the rare instances when the sequel stands up or is better than the first film,most sequels are rehashed or pale in comparison to the original,this one will not disappoint!

    This film and the original are two of my favourites and I think perhaps its time for a third entry in the series I'd love to see Guttenberg,Danson and Sellick back to see how the characters lives have progressed.It'd be great if done properly and let's face it the stars careers could probably do with a boost.

    The storyline is pretty good and the humour is very good,I don't want to give too much away,so I won't just get the movie and the original and watch them both,make a night of it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    After the massive worldwide success of Three Men and a Baby in 1984, a sequel was launched 7 years later with Ted Danson, Tom Selleck and Steve Guttenberg all reprising their roles as Jack, Peter and Michael and a slightly grown up Mary tagging along for the ride.

    In this sequel, Mary's biological English mother, Sylvia- played by American actress Nancy Travis decide to move to 'merry old England' and start a new life. Her London/English accent sounded a bit bizarre ; when I first saw this film, I'd thought she was English. However, I think it would have made much more sense if the casting directors had opted to hire an 'English' born actress for the role of Silvia instead.

    On the way, Sylvia's charm and beauty attracts the attention of fellow Englishman, Christopher Casonove (Note: I use the term English as opposed to British here, in an attempt to dispel any confusion and to say that 'Britain' is made up of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland). Later on, Peter suddenly develops feelings for Sylvia and when he finds out she is going to marry her English boyfriend, he, alongside Jack and Michael fly to England to stop Sylvia from proposing to him.

    The film is set within the English countryside backdrop (according to this site, it says it was filmed in Oxfordshire), and so rather you only get a glimpse of one part of English culture and not the rest, which is unfortunate. Many American and overseas films and TV shows in their portrayal of British/English culture and the people, have a habit in depicting British people as either upper- class snobs speaking with posh accents or the Queen's English for instance, or with Dick-Van Dyke, 'Oliver' Cockney London accents.

    I think this is partly because people outside the UK view the nation as being nothing more than London itself- which is a problem and many of them are unaware of the different accents and regions that exist in and around the UK, such as Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds, Birmingham, Newcastle, Edinburgh, Cardiff etc. Also people confuse England with Britain, which coincidently, is not the same thing. The lack of Media representation of these cities and its people to the wider world in both TV and film needs to addressed, if we are to get beyond the 'geezer' and 'maa'm' stereotypes.

    Apart from the much stereotypical portrayal of us Brits, Three Men and a Little Lady, is in itself, a lacklustre sequel to what was, in my view, a very good movie, first time round. It is very sickly sweet in most places, some of the jokes are quite flat as well and it is a bit too 'hammy' for my liking. For a so-called light- hearted movie, there are less laughs to be found and the plot and narrative is all-too predictable that you'd be able to figure out what is going to happen in the end.

    The soundtrack is great though; Boy Meets Girl's worldwide smash- hit of 89','Waiting for a Star to fall' is still one of the most infectious-yet equally memorable movie songs of all-time.

    Overall, Three Men and a Little Lady is a disappointment; well I didn't really like it that much, but if you liked the first movie so much, then give this one a spin. Otherwise, there are better family films on the market, which whilst a lot of them aren't as similar to 'Three Men and a Little Lady'- plot-wise, they offer a lot more for your money, in contrast.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Three Men And A Little Lady is the sequel to the 1987 film Three Men And A Baby and stars Ted Danson,Tom Selleck and Steve Guttenberg.

    The sequel tells the tale of three bachelors all living in the same apartment in NYC and co parent a little girl named Mary( who's really belonging to Jack played by Ted Danson) since she was a baby.

    Now Mary's mom Sylvia(Nancy Meyers) is staying with Jack's two friends Peter(Selleck) and Michael(Guttenberg) and they decide to move to a bigger place.

    However Peter begins to fall in love with Sylvia but she ends up meeting an English man(who really hates Mary and wants her to go off to boarding school owned by Fiona Shaw's charcther) and decides to travel to her native hometown in the UK and marry him..

    So will Peter admit that he loves Sylvia and stop the wedding over in the UK before its too late?.

    The humor is good,the acting is good and the story reminds me of The Parent Trap meets It Takes Two(which starred Steve Guttenberg).

    Ted Danson was hilarious in this especially near the end where he pretends to be an elderly priest who performs the wedding ceremony.

    6. 5/10.
  • Three Men And A Little Lady picks up where its predecessor Three Men And A Baby left off with bachelors Tom Selleck, Ted Danson, and Steve Guttenberg all setting up house with Nancy Travis and their daughter Robin Weisman who's now about seven. Travis back in her swinging youth was involved with all these guys and all stepped up to the plate. They've created a most unusual household.

    But Travis hasn't heard marriage from any of them and indeed why would she in this situation. So she's accepting the proposal of director Christopher Cazenove and is ready to move across the pond and do her acting career in the United Kingdom.

    That doesn't sit well with any of the guys, particularly the one that Travis was really waiting for a proposal from. Time to bust this situation up since Cazenove hasn't been truthful about a few things especially where the little lady is concerned.

    This film more than any other gives credence to Hillary Clinton's quoted African maxim that it takes a village to raise a child. Any more in that household you'd have a small village. If you liked the first film and the characters created you'll like this one.

    The man hungry Fiona Shaw, headmistress of a most strict boarding school in England has the best supporting performance. What she does to Tom Selleck almost makes it to rape.

    Three Men And A Little Lady should be pleasant viewing fare for fans of the three stars and Nancy Travis.
  • I really liked Three Men and a Baby and I really liked this film. To be honest, while there are those who will think it is better and those it is inferior, I actually put these two films equally. It could have been a tad shorter though, and there are one or two predictable parts, then again the first one did too. What I did like about Three Men and a Little Lady was its cuteness and charm. This is not the best movie I have ever seen, but it never tried to be, neither did it attempt to be better than the first. It was just an enjoyable movie, with one or two minor problems along the way. The scenery and cinematography was actually pretty lovely, and I liked the soundtrack too. The script was decent, the pacing was snappy, the story while predictable was entertaining and there were some funny sight gags and situations. The direction was neat, and the acting was fine. Robin Weisman is quite appealing as Mary, and Tom Selleck, Steve Guttenberg and Ted Danson were great together and individually. Also seeing Shiela Hancock is always a plus. Overall, cute and entertaining. 8/10 Bethany Cox
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Like "Gremlins" and "Home Alone", thus film proves that when writers have a really good idea for a follow-up and don't rush it, they can do a great job. Unlike "Grease", "Caddyshack", "Airplane!" and many others, this is a rare exception of how it can work. The three men are still bachelor, buy now bachelor fathers still raising little Mary (an adorable but not too cutesy Robin Weisnan) whose mother meets a British theatrical producer (Christopher Cazenove) and wants to take Mary to live on a huge estate in London.

    Little does mom Nancy Travis know, her husband to be wants to send Mary off to Fiona Shaw's plush boarding school. Interference from Mary's grandmother (Sheila Hancock) also threatens to further ruin Travis's happiness so this sends papa Ted Danson into a tizzy over trying to get Sylvia to marry her, bringing out pal Tom Selleck's feelings for her, and with Shaw's help, hopefully stop this travesty before Travis and Cazenove tie the knot.

    There are so many very funny moments in this, not distracted by the drug cartel subplot. Shaw steals every moment she's on screen, giving a delightfully comic performance emulating Joyce Grenfall. Her flirtation with Selleck is the highlight of the film, although the sight of Danson in Carmen Miranda like drag is pretty funny as well. What works about this is the cammaradarie between the three men (Steve Guttenberg nicely supporting but not involved in the plot outside of occasional wisecracks) and an amusing view of British culture as seen through American eyes.
  • This wasn't "Three Men and a Little Lady," it was "Three Men and an English Lady." It was insufferable, unfunny, and boring. The whole movie--or at least until I turned it off which was a little more than halfway--was about Sylvia's issues (read love life). Honestly, a sequel was a bad idea. The whole concept was unsustainable: three bachelors, a single woman, and a child. That sounds like a bad sitcom. Turned out to just be a bad movie.
An error has occured. Please try again.