User Reviews (28)

Add a Review

  • Almost three decades later,Yves Robert comes back to what he does best:childhood movies."La guerre des boutons" (1962) was the first work featuring almost only brats.It was a timeless blockbuster in France and an (English or Irish) remake was made a few years ago.

    Yves Robert tackles here Pagnol 's autobiographical books and transfers them to the screen with taste ,humor and magic.Magic is everywhere as Robert perfectly recreates those little simple pleasures of long ago."Le château de ma mère" is the follow-up to "La gloire de mon père".Both movies are likable,Robert showing tenderness for his characters:The enthusiastic atheist father (Philippe Caubère), the mother everybody would like to have (Nathalie Roussel),their two children ,Marcel -who would become the great director and writer- and his brother"petit Paul", the Christian uncle Jules who prays for his heathen brother-in-law,and plays the occasional Father Christmas. A lot of colorful secondary characters adds to the enchantment:Lili,the little boy of the garrigue,a girlie,some kind of stuck-up thing,a noble who's a true gentleman,a wicked warden(One of Jean Carmet's last parts) who's got instructions by way of heart.

    The main difference between "le château de ma mère" and the first part "la gloire de mon père" lies in the fact that the former opens the gates of life(not only the gates the father illegally opens) .The conclusion is very harsh,but Robert avoids pathos and melodrama.It does not prevent us,though,after three hours (the two movies together) in these green pastures of childhood paradise,from getting a bitter taste in the mouth.

    Robert knows it:so he ends his work with a wonderful epilogue(faithful to the book) which thoroughly justifies the title.And the audience will leave the Provence,while thinking that here or elsewhere,dreams may come true.

    As Pagnol wrote at the end of his book:"life is made of small pleasures and big grieves :don't you tell it to the children"
  • This was the follow-up to "My Father's Glory." That film probably better known but I much prefer this second film. To me, this one is far more appealing.

    The scenery, the color, the sweet, beautiful face of Nathalie Roussel and the gentle tone of the film all make it a winner. The French countryside pictured here is beautiful as we watch a family make trips through various gates en route to their destination. Some of it actually gets suspenseful. It's a very simple story but nicely. The pre-teen romance is a bit distracting but it doesn't go on long.

    The movie features good storytelling and I never get tired of the pleasing visuals. As mentioned, this story has a lot of appeal.
  • LeRoyMarko21 September 2002
    I first saw Le Château de ma mère and La Gloire de mon père shortly after their release in 1990. At first, I gave a higher ranking to Le Château. I just saw the two movies again, and now it's La Gloire who's coming on first.

    But it is not to say that Le Château is not a good movie. It's an EXCELLENT movie. The saga of Marcel continues. Young Marcel Pagnol that is. The cast is again great: Philippe Caubère and Nathalie Roussel shine, Juline Ciamaca does a great job as Marcel.

    And, once again, we get a taste of life in France's countryside, its colors, its ways of doing things. Great!

    Too bad, there was not a third movie to follow La Gloire and Le Château.

    See this one!

    Out of 100, I gave it 86. That's good for ***½ out of ****. I gave La Gloire de mon père the same star rating, but 87 out of 100.

    Seen again at home, in Toronto, on August 11th, 2002.
  • "My Father's Glory," and its sequel "My Mother's Castle," tell the story of a young boy's "wonder years" growing up in a family with an adored father, a lovely but frail mother, and assorted eccentric relatives and friends. These are incredibly charming films that feature none of the violent action and highly charged emotions that we've come to expect in popular films today. Instead, they celebrate the simple joys of life in a warm and loving family. When minor but unexpected events occasionally disrupt the day-to-day flow of events, they can seem like terrible disasters. On the other hand, a simple visit to the country can seem like a tremendous adventure. It's not necessary to have seen "My Father's Glory" to enjoy "My Mother's Castle." In fact, I happened to see them out of order and I loved them just the same. But if I had my preference, I'd watch them in order. The final scene of "My Mother's Castle" is emotionally powerful and satisfying; for me it confirmed that every minute I'd invested in these films was worthwhile. I wanted to get up there on the screen and help. In French with English subtitles.
  • Both of these films are excellent autobiographical recollections of the author's youth. I enjoyed them both very much as the subject matter is delivered with aplomb and the photography is stunning.

    They really take you back to this era, romantic in approach but doesn't neglect the real hardships experienced in that period. The way all emotions are played out is masterful.

    He also wrote Jean de Flotette and Manon des Sources. If you haven't seen them but enjoyed Le Château de ma mère and La Gloire de mon père then I recommend you do as they are both in a similar vein and are even more stunning.
  • I really enjoyed this film tremendously. There were no grand special effects, dazzling action or exciting twists--just unbelievably beautiful film-making! This is a biographical tale based on the childhood of the great French director/writer Marcel Pagnol. In fact, it is because of my love of his films that I sought out this videotape and the prequel, My Father's Glory. If you have not seen the Fanny trilogy (or the single film by the same title starring Leslie Caron), The Baker's Wife, Harvest, Manon of the Spring or any of his other films, try to see them!! What makes all these films so wonderful is the superb writing and how his characters come to life. They are charming, full of foibles and yet quite lovable! And this is definitely true in this movie as well.

    This movie picks up right where the prequel stopped--complete with the same actors. This was possible, as the films were filmed together and came out the same year.

    Of the two films, My Mother's Castle is definitely the best--though they are both extraordinary films. What I liked about this film was that it was able to evoke so much emotion within me. For example, near the end I found myself laughing loudly at the scene involving the VERY nasty guard as he gets his comeuppance! Then, only minutes later I was sobbing at the profound sadness about Pagnol's later life (after the main story is over, there is a gut-wrenching epilogue). It's profoundly sad, but since it is based on real life, so necessary.

    Watch this film with your entire family--even the cynical members of the family are sure to enjoy!
  • kenjha4 July 2010
    A family that makes weekly trips to the French countryside decides to reduce the trip time by cutting through the properties of some neighbors, leading to conflicts. Based on Pagnol's autobiographical novel about his youth, this is a gentle family film that is enjoyable enough but fails to become anything more than a pleasant diversion. The tone is low-key, and perhaps too much so. The coda, where the story flashes forward from the protagonist's childhood to adulthood, seems tacked on and rather ludicrous. Pagnol's novels "Jean de Florette" and "Magnon of the Spring" were turned into fabulous films, but this novel does not translate as well to the screen.
  • writers_reign1 November 2007
    Warning: Spoilers
    I'm delighted to find that every single comment on this beautiful movie is Positive, indeed, it would be difficult if not impossible to find anything negative to comment on. If you've ever been a child, if you ever had a beautiful but fragile mother, if you ever danced and skipped through a Golden childhood - or just wished you did - then this is for you; it's Meet Me In St Louis without the songs, It's I Remember Mama without the Norwegian accents, The Happy Time without the Canadian overtones and any other film you can think of that evokes those fleeting days of enchantment When We Were Very Young. Above all it's a wonderful antidote to the angst, stress, violence etc that comprise the fabric of the modern cinema - and don't even mention the anti-cinema brigade as personified by Godard who could no more shoot even one Frame as lyrical as this than he could master Mandarin in 24 hours. It would be churlish to single out anyone from the superlative cast and the only thing better than watching it for the first time is to watch it for the twentieth. Magnifique.
  • Every holiday Marcel and his family go to their cottage in the Provence (France). He likes the hills in this region. During one of these holidays he meets Isabelle, a pretty but conceited girl...

    Many people have championed this film. I guess I don't get it. I liked the movie, and it was fun, but not mind-blowing. There is a prim and proper father who has a weird obsession with teaching and always being right. There is a mother who seems to more or less just exist, despite the film having her in the title.

    What stands out the most is that one of the kids has a ridiculous dubbed voice. Maybe I should have watched it in French, but I didn't, and this is what I was stuck with.... a kid with a weird voice.
  • keygrippa20 December 2001
    I'd recommend this film very strongly to movie lovers.

    Oh, you'll have to read the subtitles. It's French... don't be afraid... this film makes complete sense to any audience and is not art for art's sake.

    But hey, you wouldn't be reading these comments if you weren't intelligent and discerning, so subtitles wouldn't be a problem, I know.

    Really, give it a try. The other comments on this movie are absolutely correct. It is completely charming and will hold you in it's influence for the whole movie. Mostly the story of a the relationship between a small boy and a girl he meets. Well-observed, hilariously funny in parts. Exquisite acting of the first order. You'll never forget it. Give it a try.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "My Mother's Castle" is the second opus of Marcel Pagnol's autobiographical memories adapted by Yves Robert in 1990, following the glorious "My Father's Glory". Both are parts of the same story, split in two maybe to let time to meditate on the enchantment induced by the first.

    Indeed, "My Father's Glory" was an exploration of childhood with a mixture of tenderness, nostalgia and idealization of the people who inhabited these memories, especially the parents: Joseph, the literate schoolteacher capable to absorb every single piece of knowledge and inculcate them to his son, and Augustine, the most caring and loving of all the mothers.

    The first film was focused on the relationships between Marcel and his father, reaching an emotional climax with the immense pride felt after a memorable hunting trip. But all through the film, there were glimpses of Augustine's oedipal deification. She, more than any other character, was treated with a particular grace and delicacy, people could shout, argue or laugh, she was the quiet strength, the emotional pillar of the family, standing on the symbolic pedestal of her indescribable angelic beauty."My Mother's Castle" explores the maternal bond with more depth.

    The film features the same episodes in the countryside, where the Family goes every holiday, to the same house. One of its delights is to make us revisit a location that became familiar to us as if it was part of our own memories. When the film starts, like Marcel, we yearn for this magical Provence and hope the film won't take place in the city. Our hearts long for that escapism and thankfully, they do escape.

    And they get back to the green hills, the grasshoppers, to Lili, Edmond and the wonderful gallery of colorful characters ... and we're glad to see them as if they were old friends. The countryside is the perfect backdrop for Pagnol's memories, and probably the only element deserving its idealization. For Marcel, the bond with the countryside is almost parental as it awakened his most endearing memories. But initial emotions put apart, "My Mother's Castle" was likely to create a déjà-vu feeling without bringing much newness to the story.

    And as glad as I was to be back to the countryside, and see these faces again, I had mixed feelings regarding the beginning, which didn't add much since the first film and even lost itself in the episode involving Isabelle, an aristocratic girl infatuated on Marcel, oddly treating him like a vassal. This chapter of Marcel's life was so weird, although significant, I was hoping it wouldn't occupy the whole story, even Jean Rochefort's performance as the eccentric father left me perplexed and I felt the film had to be more than a series of anecdotes. But then, the story picks up and the magic reappears when the Pagnols start going every weekend to the house.

    They meet in their road a guard who was one of Joseph's former pupils; he benevolently proposes them to use a shortcut along the canal, instead of their usual path that cost them four hours of walking through a winding road. Joseph reluctantly accepts the spare key to open several locked gate doors along the canal and across private lands. It became a habit, Joseph learned to use the boys as scout observers, and as the story progresses, we follow them walking along the estates bending over, our hearts pounding that they wouldn't meet a bitter caretaker with his ferocious dog.

    Across their path, they meet an old and affable aristocrat who don't mind their trespassing and even offers bright red roses to Augustine. He instantly creates the picture of Augustine as rooted in Marcel's memory, a beautiful and frail women holding red roses, and out of fear of dogs, gets nervous when they come to the last door. They finally find the door padlocked and as we expect, the encounter with the guard happens and provides one of the film's most critical moments where for once, one person not even touched by the sort of divine grace embracing the story, and threaten Joseph to prosecution, causing Augustine to faint, succumbing to her eternal fear.

    Of course, all ends well that ends well, but it's not much in the resolution of this subplot than the real conclusion that the film's emotion finally implode. After a happy celebration, the film takes a surprisingly dark turn enlightening us on what became of these people who made Marcel's childhood. It starts with two hands holding each other, following a black car, Marcel and Paul mourn their mother prematurely dead, Lili died in the First World War, Paul became a goatherd, affected by the countryside as Marcel was, and left the world in the thirties. For the first time, the film conveys sad emotions as a way to cancel off the happiness and fairy-tale like aspect of the earlier memories. And we understand it's precisely because of these sad memories that Marcel Pagnol looked at the years preceding them with happier eyes.

    Lately, he'd become the successful film-maker we know, and after turning a large house in Marseilles into a film studio, he finds the infamous door, and by breaking it, he breaks the spell that caused so much torments in Augustine's heart. Like the image of Marcel holding the partridges to the sky, illustrating his father's (moment of) glory, the mother's castle awakened the image of Augustine holding the red roses on her, this is the angelic and fragile image that would forever symbolize Augustine, the queen of in Pagnol's castle of memories..

    More than anything, the power of the two films is to translate universal feelings into powerful imagery, this is what childhood is all about, images rooted in our hearts, this is what Cinema, as an art-form, is all about, and this is why "My Father's Glory" and "My Mother's Castle" are one of the summits reached by French cinema, higher than these immortal hills of Provence.
  • jmerienne16 November 2020
    Although I am french, I found the story quite boring especially due to the internal competition of who will be the worst actor ever (in the French version). If you like the "South of France" atmosphere, just go directly to Jean de Florette and Manon des sources, which are based on the same author's books but are masterpiece.
  • "O for one of those hours of gladness. Gone alas with our youth too soon"*

    My Mother's Castle picks up where My Father's Glory left off, tracing young Marcel's life over the next year as his enchanting remembrances of things past comes full circle. If you were nostalgic for the south of France after seeing My Father's Glory, you do not have to wait long to once again smell the sprigs of wild thyme. After resuming their life again in Marseilles, the family: Joseph (Philippe Caubere), Augustine (Nathalie Roussel), Marcel (Julien Ciamaca), brother Paul (Victorien Delamare) and baby sister decide to return to Provence for Christmas and then again at Easter.

    Marcel is reunited with his friend Lili but soon discovers the charms of women in the person of Isabelle (Julie Timmerman), a somewhat snooty young lady who takes on the affectation of nobility to impress (and dominate) Marcel. Their relationship shows promise but comes to an abrupt end early in the film when Isabelle's family suddenly leaves. Soon Augustine has the idea of returning to their country home each weekend. This, however, presents a small problem. Aside from the fact that Joseph, with the aid of Augustine's charms, must rearrange his teaching schedule, the family must walk five miles from the trolley station to their country home using up much of their weekend time.

    This problem is solved when Joseph meets Bouzique (Philippe Uchan), one of his former pupils. Bouzique is a canal guard who shows them how to cut eight hours from their weekly walk by illegally cutting over other people's property that runs along the canal. At first Joseph is reluctant but finally agrees. This takes on an air of great adventure and humor as Bouzique gives a key to Joseph who must unlock the doors on each estate that stand in his way. The walk becomes the focus of the film, as everyone in the group must carefully avoid drawing attention to themselves. One house in particular, owned by a grouchy caretaker and a surly dog named Masher, causes Augustine to be quite fearful. Like My Father's Glory, My Mother's Castle consists of charming vignettes that evoke a simpler time. The film works its way into our heart because the characters care about each other and we care about them. Like all idealized reflections of the past, however, it ultimately gives way to bittersweet reality, reminding us very gently how soon youth passes, but as poet Shelley put it, "Our sweetest songs are those that tell of saddest thought".

    *From Kerry Dances by James Lynam Molloy
  • Yves Robert offers a second delightful story of Marcel Pagnol's innocent youth of the early 1900s in the sunny, rocky landscape of Aubagne in Provence.

    After "My Father's Glory," an equally charming tale of the halcyon days of the author's childhood, "My Mother's Castle" concludes the tale with the author's entrance into adolescence and his triumphant return to Marseilles as a successful adult.

    Not wishing to wait through the long term at school, Marcel's mother declares her affinity for the countryside of Provence, and the family begins making weekend visits, much to the delight of young Marcel.

    Pagnol revisits his beautiful hills in Aubagne, just outside Marseilles, rekindling his friendship with the local boy, Lili, and meeting what he considers to be the young woman of his dreams, only to reaffirm that youth is best spent frolicking with his chum. Marcel's charming and loving mother, his wise and benevolent father, his impish brother, and his gregarious "Oncle Jules" return in their wonderful roles.

    The film is reminiscent of the masterpiece of "Cinema Paradiso," where a tale is told through the eyes of a film producer who fell in love with life while watching films in his small Italian village.

    "My Mother's Castle," coupled with "My Father's Glory," make for four hours of triumphant, genuine cinema. Don't miss them.
  • This is another achingly beautiful, nostalgic, funny and bittersweet movie documenting the childhood of filmmaker Marcel Pagnol in the hills behind Marseilles. I hesitate to call a film 'beautiful' because that can often be code for boring and pretentious. That is not the case with 'Le Château de Ma Mère' and it is not the case with the first film in this wonderful pair, 'La Gloire de Mon Père'. True, these are gentle films but nonetheless captivating. Few of us will have grown up at the time these events took place and few of us will have grown up in the French countryside, but most of us will relate to the emotions expressed in these movies; we will all have experienced the challenges of growing up and the joys, sorrows, triumphs and defeats we encounter along the way. This movie and its predecessor celebrates these. The dialogue is all in French, as you would expect, so you will have to deal with subtitles - for which I am very pleased. I would hate to have these films ruined by being dubbed. (shudder!) Don't let subtitles deter you from watching these movies though. They are wonderful.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The sequel to My Father's Glory. The story itself is not as developed and interesting as in part one, as it mainly deals with the short cut the Pagnols use to reach their summer domicile. Still, it's the end that makes this sequel a very good movie. The end symbolizes the transitoriness of life and bliss. Nothing stays the same. Time goes by. We grow older. The magic of childhood diminishes. We lose loved ones. Our hearts break in two. Kids don't know such things. Life, as it proceeds, changes everything. And then, sometimes, we stop and look back, just as Marcel did at the very end, when he walked the path of his childhood, accompanied by tender shadows of the past. We look behind our shoulder and... what do we see? We see shadows of our own past, maybe we hear the laughter of young voices, so full of joy and energy, and maybe we wonder what has happened to the kid who used to laugh that way? Why don't we laugh that way today? Because this is one part of our life that's inevitably gone. That's what's so superbly symbolized by the last few shots. When I first saw this, I felt tears in my eyes. This is an eternal story of how fading life is, and therewith this movie has achieved its place in my heart.
  • Oddly enough I found this preferable to La Gloire de Mon Pere. It's an impressive feat for a film with, to be honest, not very much plot, to be enjoyable and meaningful nonetheless. The final scene, with the guard's come-uppance from the lock-keepers, is extremely funny.
  • My Mother's Castle is the distilled essence of nostalgia for lost childhood - we see the hero's story in a golden light of memory, where the desserts are always the most tempting that could ever be, and the dishes never get dirty. The cinematography is stunning - the exact evocation of that warm and golden place in our memories. And the ending is, like it says - stunning, satisfying, perfect. I just love this movie - it's one of life's little miracles.
  • When my cousin and I rented this film, we had no idea that it was French and in subtitles. Although I am in the process of learning the French language (slowly), I was a bit taken aback by the fact that I had to watch it in subtitles. However, after the first 10 minutes I was completely immersed in the beautiful countryside, and the flow of the language.

    First of all, there is no specific plot to this story. One event flows into the next, but they are unrelated, held together by the characters. But the acting and the landscapes are beautiful and ethereal, and you wish that you could be there.

    This is not to say that the film doesn't make sense, it most certainly does, and there is a point to it. The end comes on a bit abruptly, although it too is gentle and poignant.

    As long as you can read fast enough to keep up with the subtitles (and after a bit you don't even notice you're doing it), this is a lovely film to see. It's quite suitable for all ages, but as it IS in subtitles, you don't want to watch it with children too young to read fast enough.

    A lovely film, very French, and very beautiful. 10/10, definitely.
  • Like the first part, this is equally heart-warming, human, overwhelmingly beautiful and splendid cinematographically, besides being extremely well written, but still I prefer the first part, which I found more lyrical. This one is shorter and more concise and direct and involves a small girl as well with her odd family, while it also tells a few tragedies that befell later, so this could be found a slight bit darker than the first part, which is all idyllic splendour and amazing wildernsss photography. The first part brought you closer into the landscape and soul of Provence and explaned why Marcel just had to love those hills forever, while this second part deals more in strictly human business and destinies. Both are perfect, but the first part warmed my heartr even more.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "My Mother's Castle," also known in French as "Le Château de ma mère, is the sequel to a two-part series of films based on famed playwright, novelist and filmmaker Marcel Pagnol's childhood memoirs set in turn of the century France. "My Mother's Castle," is a continuation of the story of Marcel, Pagnol's protagonist, a young boy who grows up under the tutelage of his father, Joseph, a public school teacher in Marseilles. Unlike the first film, "My Father's Glory," the sequel focuses more on Marcel, instead of the uninspiring conflict between father Joseph and Uncle Jules, one a confirmed atheist and the other, a devoted Catholic. Of the two films, I found "My Mother's Castle" superior to "My Father's Glory," not only because it moves at a brisker pace, but there are more interesting things happening to Marcel and his family (instead of the long-winded tale involving hunting).

    We find out first that the family's trip to the country home outside Marseilles takes place mostly on foot. This becomes an important piece of information later on which will be discussed in a moment. Marcel soon becomes smitten with an eccentric young girl, Isabelle, who orders him to dress up in different outfits. Isabelle's parents are as eccentric as she is, and soon the children's relationship ends when Joseph decries that Marcel isn't allowed to see them again. Interestingly enough, the family is forced to give up their expensive digs after the father, a newspaper columnist, insults his boss and is presumably let go.

    The encounter with Bouzigue, Joseph's former pupil, leads to some even more interesting complications. Bouzigue is a canal worker, who offers a key to Joseph, that opens various doors along the path next to the canal; this allows the family to take a shortcut and save them hours of traveling to the country home. The only problem is that while taking the shortcut, the family ends up trespassing on the private property of various noblemen who own houses along the waterway. At first, Joseph refuses to even consider the idea, but wife Augustine persuades him to take the shortcut, as it enables the family to make the trip to the country house every week.

    Joseph ends up rationalizing his decision to accept Bouzigue's offer but deep down knows he's going up against his moral code. It's a fascinating quandary Joseph finds himself in, and I'm sure Joseph's decision will remind most of us that we've occasionally been guilty of an ethical lapse or two in our lives. The family's encounter with the first property owner ends up quite benign as the man turns out to be a thoroughly gracious and helpful fellow. A groundskeeper on another estate allows the family to pass through unimpeded.

    On the family's second trip, things go completely awry as they find the last door padlocked, and a surly caretaker at the last estate threatens to write an official report that could lead to Joseph being fired and losing his pension. Unlike the first film, there's a real dark moment here, and it's nicely resolved in the third act when Bouzique and his co-workers get the caretaker to tear up his report by threatening him with violating the canal company's rules about padlocking their doors.

    The story also takes us back to Marseilles where Marcel must pass a big exam to obtain a scholarship at the most prestigious school in the country. Marcel's Mom has a little more to do here than in the first film where she plays the part of a stay at home Mom.

    "My Mother's Castle" ends on a sad note. We learn that Augustine dies five years later and leaves Joseph bereft. Marcel's childhood friend from the countryside, Lili, dies in World War I and brother Paul not long afterward, at the young age of 31. Marcel eventually becomes a film director, and while checking out an old house his company has bought for a film studio, he discovers it's the very same house where his family met the unpleasant caretaker and almost ended Joseph's career.

    "My Mother's Castle" is a wistful remembrance of the childhood of author Pagnol. If we think back, I'm sure there are a few extraordinary tales we can recall about our childhood. The narrative is put together in such a way that it reminds us of how impressionable we can be as children and that the events of those times leave a lasting impression that can never be forgotten, even when one reaches the last days of old age.
  • (1991) My Mother's Castle/ Le château de ma mère ADVENTURE/ DRAMA (French with English subtitles)

    The second of two films adapted from the autobiographical novels written by Marcel Pagnol originally released in 1957 co-written and directed by Yves Robert about a young boy's experiences upon growing up while visiting the countryside. The boy who is also the narrator is Joseph Pagnol (Philippe Caubère) All I can say is that this film cannot be watched unless the first film had been looked at first which is called "My Father's Glory". If you enjoy that film may also enjoy this second installment as well.
  • We watched this film in French class, and our teacher covered up the subtitles. Try it sometime. Not being able to understand all, or any, of the words makes you concentrate more on the characters. Their subtext, actions, and vocal inflections really add to the film if you just concentrate on them. The French countryside is beautiful-I wish I could be there. Oh well, I guess I'll just have to be content with this movie. The only problem I have with this film is the lack of real plot. It's basically just a chronology of events in Marcel's life. Mais, c'est la vie! Rating: Four out of Five stars
  • I would first like to say, that when my french teacher told us we were watching a film about the french countryside, I was not too thrilled, as you can imagine! But the film was great, and the story line was funny,moving and interesting. There was lots of humour concerning Marcel(the main lead) and a young girl he meets, and you dont have to be fluent in french to watch and understand the film, as there are subtitles which, at first, are a little distracting but you easily get used to them! A definate must-see film for anyone studying or intereste in the french language!
  • Dont get me wrong this is an other great film from Yves Robert.But I felt at the end of the film VERY and I mean VERY depressed.I think it was a wrong idea to put this ending who his from the third book called "le temps des secrets"(the time of secrets)into le chateau de ma mere because I think that nobody was ready for such a terrible ending.They should have made the third book into a film as well it would have made the final much easier to digest.
An error has occured. Please try again.