Add a Review

  • lavatch26 January 2023
    Warning: Spoilers
    Lorna Doone and John Ribb were destined for one another. As a child of nature, Lorna rescues John after he fell into the drink while fishing. After that, John Ribb was history!

    The film was well-photographed, but extremely dark in places. There was a star-studded cast with Polly Walker as Lorna, Clive Owen as John, and the incomparable Billie Whitelaw as John's mother Sarah. Rachel Kempson is delightful as Lady Dugal.

    It turns out that Lorna was not a Doone at all, but of aristocratic pedigree in the Dugal clan. By the end, John has been dubbed a knight by King James II.

    Carver Doone was one of the most despicable villains imaginable. It was never clear who was the woman who gave birth to Carver's son, little Ensie. Carver is clearly obsessed with Lorna.

    By the end, both Lorna and John are the worse for wear. Lorna is shot by Carver, and John is nearly killed. With both attired in nightgowns at the end, they finally have the opportunity to concentrate on more serious matters of the heart.
  • Very disappointing version of Lorna Doone. Too many missing characters, no romantic scenes, changes in story line, too short, appeared low budget. Hardly enough dialogue to understand the story if you're not familiar with the novel. In some scenes it looks like Lorna has a cold sore on her upper lip. I'm sure make-up did it's best to hide it. I guess they didn't want to halt filming until it healed up, pity. Most likely why this movie lacked kissing scenes. Only one disappointing kissing scene at the very end. Lorna Doone is a great epic tale and should be told true. The 2000 version of Lorna Doone is twice as long, more romantic, much more enjoyable and more true to the book.
  • I first read "Lorna Doone" about 20 years ago and absolutely loved it! It is a classic historical romance set in the 1600s when the west country was several days' journey from London and law and order was much harder to enforce. Sadly, this version of the book takes several liberties with the story and was incredibly disappointing in my opinion. The acting and production values are OK but the way the story was messed about with was dreadful. Why do television adaptations do this? Why would they think that the thousands of fans of a book would want them to change the story??? One of life's great mysteries!!! The BBC made an excellent version which was televised at Christmas in the early 1990s which I am still trying to track down a copy of! Take my advice, read the book and don't bother with this paltry version!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I watched this film version of R.D. Blackmore's classic novel as a substitute until the 2001 A&E version was released on video. And what a poor substitution it proved to be.

    This version does not have the authentic, I-feel-like-I'm-there aspect of the A&E movie. The actors are, for the most part, wooden (with Sean Bean the exception) and the "romance" seems forced and contrived. In fact, there is no kissing until the end of the movie! The triangle between John Ridd, Lorna Doone (or Lady Lorna Dugal, whichever you prefer)and the evil Carver Doone isn't mentioned or expanded upon. We don't get much insight into Carver here, or as to why he has some (if any) romantic feelings for Lorna. This movie cuts out many of the key and interesting characters of the novel, such as Counsellor Doone, and John's sharp-tongued youngest sister Lizzie which were crucial to the plot. The screenplay itself is lacking in conviction. The political intrigue also doesn't figure in the script. The way Lorna came into being with the Doones isn't true to the original story. Now, don't get me wrong, Clive Owen is a handsome and talented actor (watch Gosford Park and King Arthur for confirmation) but he comes across as bland and stoic throughout, and long hair (it may have been a bad wig) just doesn't suit him!!!! Polly Walker is a lovely and accomplished actress (see Enchanted April and Patriot Games, in which she also costarred with Sean Bean), but she appears colorless and lackluster. She has a cold sore on her lip that make-up can't hide, and the costumes don't seem authentic. The late Robert Stephens does a respectable turn as Sir Ensor Doone, although he only refers to Lorna as his favorite rather than his granddaughter, which she was reputed to be in the book. Also, it seems to me that Owen and Walker are too old for their roles (maybe it's the make-up) and the scenery is brown, cold, gray and barren, without so much of a hint of a sunny sky. I understand that it is set in Southwest England, but it is green there and they do get their sunshine!!! The portrayal of Tom Faggus' character and his "death", which doesn't happen in the novel, depresses the film even more. The one positive note is Sean Bean's performance as Carver. Although it doesn't even come close to matching Aidan Gillen's portrayal in the A&E movie, Bean does make one mean villain. In short, watch this only if you've got a few hours to kill, but don't expect anything exciting or for it to be true to the novel. See any other version ( but I highly recommend A&E's film) over this tired adaptation.
  • docp5 December 1998
    This TV movie of R.D. Blackmore's classic love story is itself a classic in every respect. The characters are all very believable and have real personalities without them becoming in any way artificial. They are just as one might imagine the people in this setting to behave and react. There are no weak links in the casting. The settings are authentic as are the costumes. In every way this is a movie to watch time and time again and still to find new things to enjoy.
  • I have 2 words for you. Sean Bean. He is the only worthwhile presence in this film. But even so, don't see this movie. Even though he is good as the main villain, you don't want to waste your time.

    I didn't care about the characters (except the little boy) and in fact, I didn't really care if the star crossed lovers ended up together or died. The movie did not make me care or BELIEVE that these people cared about each other at all. I have read a lot of "classic" novels after seeing the movies and this movie made me not even want to read the book. The story seems so boring. But I may go ahead and read it to try to redeem the story in my head.

    Stay away from Lorna Doone. The actress who played Lorna was also in Sense and Sensibility and she was much better in that. Watch Sharpe, Horatio Hornblower, A & E has great movies of novels like Pride and Prejudice. Or miniseries like the Forsyte Saga. Check them out, don't bother with Lorna Doone.
  • genehunt7121 April 2019
    It's not even filmed in the beautiful West Country where it is set, instead choosing Scotland. Er, no thanks!
  • This is an enchanting production. Although it omits parts of the book, it faithfully reflects what is essentially a love story - a love story which takes place in the West Country in the 17th century in the time of King James II and the Monmouth Rebellion, which aimed to depose him.

    When I read the book, its evocative descriptions of the Exmoor landscape conjured up beautiful images in my mind and prompted me to visit the area. The Exmoor scenery was absolute magic and I was able to enjoy it once again in this 1990 Thames TV adaptation of the book.

    And yes, I know the film was actually shot in Scotland, but it could just as easily have been the wild windswept landscape of Exmoor. Producer Alan Horrox explained that 'the novel demands sweeping moorland vistas, plunging waterfalls, and a secret valley, as well as much else besides. When we researched the available locations on Exmoor, we discovered that much of the area has changed profoundly since the 17th century setting of the original novel...I believe it could never successfully evoke the full blooded dramatic sweep of this classic novel.' The settings for this move capture absolutely the haunting beauty of Exmoor. They embrace the remote and mysterious valley where the Doone clan of brutal outlaws live, all of them exuding 17th century lawlessness. Many other characters also seem to have just walked out of the pages of history - including King James II (Hugh Fraser) and his merciless judge, George Jeffreys .

    Clive Owen plays the noble, honest and hard working yeoman, John Ridd, whose father has been murdered by the odious Doone family - Sean Bean is convincing as Carver Doone, its savage and vindictive leader who tries to shoot Lorna -and Miles Anderson is wonderful as Tom Faggus, the bad but generous and loveable highwayman who is in love with John's sister Annie (Jane Gurnett).

    Polly Walker delivers an unforgettable performance as the heroine, Lorna Doone - a bewitching beauty and the love of John's life. The distinguished cast also includes Billie Whitelaw, who offers a sensitive portrayal of John's caring and gentle mother Sarah.

    The movie is a nice watchable length - 87 minutes - ideal for an inspirational and uplifting screening after dinner. And in case you're wondering, John and Lorna ultimately live happily ever after!