It might be easy to confuse the effectiveness of this movie with the actors' performances. I find that script or editing is generally a culprit when things don't work well, and that may be the case here. The story line, as it's presented, feels disconnected from scene to scene. This is particularly true in the very last scene, which doesn't give us a any information whatsoever about how the King winds up in the condition he's in; we are left to make assumptions. But perhaps it doesn't matter how the king ended up as he did. Alex Corti, director, may only have wanted us to be aware that the King played out a wildly descriptive metaphor for the psychological condition that plagued him throughout the movie. The end makes sense, metaphorically. This is a significant film for Timothy Dalton because his acting is virtually devoid of posturing and hyperbole. I'm struck again and again at how authentic are his reactions, given his grasp of the King's dysfunction. Perhaps because of the story, or the expectations of the director, Dalton seems instinctively aware of the King's passion, obsessive focus and possessiveness. We don't know Dalton in his private life, but I find him most effective when he takes on characters of a dark and threatening nature. I don't think he makes one false step in this movie, which is saying a lot. Of all his films that I've seen, this one--while very dark and difficult to watch for its unrelenting obsession and depressive qualities--is his most authentic; his most believable. Over and above his performance, I don't agree with the other reviewer that Valeri Golino gives us a wooden performance with no nuance. She demonstrates early on that her character is given to spontaneous, unguarded passions; that she is naive to political protocol. Indeed, we see these qualities mature into calculated vengeance, when she has been mortally wounded by the betrayal of her husband and family, at which point she becomes ruthless--as abused victims often are, in the face of too early or horrific a trauma in their lives. She figures out how to play the game to her advantage, and given her natural eccentricity, such a discovery makes her the most dangerous player in the film. At no time, even when she is resisting/ignoring the Kings' advances, do I doubt her wild and iconoclastic streak, which says everything about Golino's performance. Indeed, the King's obsession with her seems a completely natural outgrowth of his admiration for her ability to flaunt protocol, and her intelligence. I think both performances were excellent. It's the general darkness of the script that makes it difficult to watch, and the strange, ham-handed way the director/editor has of piecing together scenes. This is not an action movie, or even a costume drama. It's a movie about dysfunctional motivations, uses and abuses of power, and in this regard the movie is a rather timeless statement on the psychology of individual and political power. Watch it and decide for yourself. Timothy Dalton and Valeri Golino will not disappoint.
Add a Review
-
jill-zahner-11 May 2009
-
johannes2000-116 August 2006Timothy Dalton gives an extremely strong performance of a king who is torn between his duty, his lust and his royal rights. This king is bored and frustrated by the servility and flattery of his court, but at the same time lives up to it and considers his "droit the seigneur" as something of a God-given right. When he is crossed in this expectancy by the strong will and pride of an attractive married lady at his court, his lust turns into obsession. The movie gives us beautiful photography of Italian (?) surroundings and sumptuous palaces, obviously shot in authentic places, and a fair share of appealing costumes.
There are unfortunately also many flaws in the movie. To begin with, the English dubbing of almost all of the (international) cast is very annoying, it seemed as if the English voices they used were often not suited at all to the persons they were supposed to be, and it sounded mostly like people reading lines in a radio-play. The main flaw however was the part of Jeanne by Valeria Golino, playing like a wooden doll, most of the time being angry and giving everyone (including the king) the evil eye and snubs and contempt. You never see her smile even once and although she's very attractive, this makes it very hard to understand the all-consuming obsession the king has with her.
This brings me to the script, I just couldn't believe the things happening! Jeanne hated her husband and took revenge on him. But why on earth did she suddenly ran back to her hated husband, and why did she run back to the king after he (the king) had killed her husband, and why did the king (are you still with me??) all of a sudden NOT want her back, notwithstanding the fact that she, being a widow now, was at last free?!? Also the historical background of the story is obscure and unfathomable, like where on earth is this little kingdom, and what were these wars that were going on?
The lasting feeling is two-fold: one of disappointment, since it could have been so much more and better, and one of praise for Timothy Dalton, who proves here what a great and impressive character-actor he is, in spite of the fact that he too must have felt that he was fighting a lost cause. He deserved better!! -
jgarner13615 March 2005The best part of sitting through this movie was Timothy Dalton. The worst part was the character he played.
"The King's Whore" could have been a great movie. It had a lot of good things going for it, but somewhere along the way it got boring. The characters even seemed to get bored and quit trying to carry the script. Or maybe the script just went on too long. Either way, the movie didn't end. It just quit.
*May Contain Spoilers*
The beginning of the movie was very good. We meet Jean and Charles, the man she marries, and see her meet the king, and the king becoming obsessed with her. She tries to avoid him, to no avail.
The king was so obsessed by Jean that he let everything else go, and ends up committing suicide. Jean loses her husband and son, even though the only reason she became the king's mistress was to keep the family in good graces. She ends up alone.
The middle of the movie is simply silly.
The only redeeming thing in the whole movie is Timothy Dalton in costume. Too bad the character he plays is so lame. -
merri48822 August 2006The storyline of the King's Mistress may seem like your basic Barbara Cartland novel but this is not the case with this movie. It is a bit difficult to watch since it is a foreign film for the most part but the actors do a fine job and if you stay with it the story line becomes a bit surprising. If you can find it, give it a watch. And if you are expecting to lust after Dalton when you see him in that wig, forget it, he's a somewhat pitiful bad-guy in this movie and you'll end up feeling sorry for the character and again aware of what a fine actor Dalton really is. (I had to buy this movie on e-bay so you may have to look for it!)
-
rowena-826 March 2004I enjoyed this movie but it did fall short of the great film that it should have been. Main strengths were the stunning visual aspects and Timothy Dalton's mesmerising performance. Surely he has to be the most underrated actors of our time. His portrayal of psychological complexity in his characters in unmatched. Weak points are the jumpy plot, erratic editing (apparently a lot of scenes were cut) and lack of bodice ripping scenes. There is plenty of emotion but the steaminess is mostly implied. Still worth seeing, particularly for Dalton fans or for lovers of historical costume drama.
-
carrie_pl20 February 2004This is an outstanding, breathtaking history which astonished me. I recorded this film when it was emited on TV and I watch it 4 days a week. I know it could be strange to you, but I love this story. It is so moving. It's a masterpiece. The actors, the screenplay, th dialogues! Valeria Golino and Timothy Dalton are gorgeous. It doesn't matter who and what tells about this film - I love it!
-
dgoddess1 January 2001Timothy Dalton does it again! As I become a bigger fan of his I am amazed at the depth and emotion he lends to his characters. This movie has some plot weaknesses which I cannot decide if would be corrected by less or more film. Bravo to Timothy Dalton. His range of emotion is fantastic. Even when not speaking he conveys so much as when Jeanne finally comes to him. Dalton also continues to show off his sword prowess with a very complex scene near the end. Worth seeing!
-
I have no idea how on earth I missed this film. It threatens to become a new favourite Timothy Dalton appearance. Simply put, this 1990 gem is one of the best movies I've seen about the power of true love. What an epic example of acting magnificence from Timothy Dalton! With another 7 years of acting under his belt after Jane Eyre, his portrayal of the King is authentic, magnetic, deep, raw, with hints of Jane's Eyre's Rochester only more powerful. He makes no mis-steps in this piece, plus he has a sword and oh boy can he use it! So if you're a fan of Timothy Dalton, find this film and enjoy the treat. And if you're not a fan, you are about to discover a top performance by one of the finest actors of our time. You're welcome.
-
Boris_G2 August 2008I first saw this film - attracted by the fact it includes the excellent Timothy Dalton, a film score by Gabriel Yared, and Frederic Raphael as one of the screenplay writers - in the much abridged 90 minute version released on a Spanish DVD (fortunately including an English soundtrack). Even from this - which cuts at least 40 minutes from the original version - I could see this was a beautifully filmed and excellently acted drama. It also explains why so many comments here at IMDb suggest that the story is psychologically implausible. A more complete version of the film has just (in 2008) been released in France (lasting 127 minutes - alas for English speakers dubbed into French and naturally without subtitles): from this it is evident that for the 90 minute version bits were trimmed here and there almost throughout the film. So seeing something approaching the complete film is a revelation - a much harder and more cynical view of the main characters (particularly the king and his mistress), and it is clear that Valeria Golino's character *never* forgives the man who so grievously betrayed her (I'm expressing it in this way to avoid creating a 'spoiler'), but in fact exploits him in the end for her own purposes. All of which makes the genuine love which grows between the central characters all the more poignant and moving - there's a sense of something beautiful which has been warped and made into a destructive force by their social circumstances and the collision between social principle and unbridled yet illusionary 'power'.
Strangely enough, the French version, though more complete than the Spanish, cuts some scenes which appear in the Spanish version (one scene in particular adds a certain spice to Golino's character when the viewer is more aware of her motivations from the longer version of the film): so until either the complete German version is released, or a complete English language version is released, those who love this film will have to buy both the Spanish and the French DVDs. -
satinicedreams14 January 2004This movie is deep and has meaning. it's about a woman that won't acept a man that loves her deeply, he's a king and he's handsome he gives her everything she wants you might ask yourself what the problem is well she's afraid of he's love and she loves him to but won't let herself or him know that fact.intresting movie and touching.
-
PaulaKaye1814 September 2001In all FAIRNESS, more than likely, Mr. Dalton accepted this project because it started out as an interesting character study of a King with an Obsessive/Compulsive Disorder. And how said disorder can lead a person into becoming a stalker, peeping-tom, and lusting after a woman who refuses to have anything to do with him other than "friendship". However, he does become a more nurturing care-giver than Florence Nightingale, and Sister Kenny combined AFTER the object of affection/obsession contracts SMALLPOX!
I truly believe that this flick was supposed to be a real bodice ripper. Y'know, sexcapades in Period Costume, but, then, somehow, it took a diversionary track to "make a statement" about devotion and how "we" are used by those we love and how "we" use those who love us.
Waffling between "historical mock-u-drama" and bodice ripper, loaded down with a female lead that gives no more emotionally than a 2x4 plank of lumber, it's no wonder that Mr. Dalton started chewing on the scenery! Mr. Dalton's talent is too good to be wasted in this dreck!
In summary, if you love Mr. Dalton's work, you'll find SOMETHING redeemable in this film, (I did even though I'll never get the time I spent watching it back!). Otherwise, rent JANE EYRE, or A LION IN WINTER. -
lwfusco3 December 2005this movie has hit many of life's little dramas we all have around us. it's just like a friend you haven't seen in a long time that's catching you up on the latest news. it is not overly acted. the other title, 'the king's mistress', is more of a front of the store movie name than it is the back room like the original name, 'the king's whore'. but, i believe, 'whore' is the better of the two titles. they all play realistic parts and it's easy to keep up with. the feelings the actors portray seem quite sincere. the life emotions that are brought to the screen make this one of the most involved movies i've seen in years.
oh, the 'jane eyre' with timothy in it was more of a play an amateur would put on compared to this movie. the 'jane eyre' with george c. scott and orsen wells were both much better versions. -
Curly-1031 July 1999I'm anxious to see Timothy Dalton in anything he does, but this movie was not worth my time. I hung in there until the end more out of optimism that it would improve than enjoyment. Basically the king is a controlling dog and Jeanne is a, well, you know. This movie is going into the "waste of my time" category. If you want to see Timothy Dalton at his finest, rent the BBC production of Jane Eyre--now THAT is a film.
-
Prince-717 October 1998This movie was simply long and drawn out. Its plot was extremely shaky and the acting was less then exceptional. Basically it is about a King who in his wise decision-making decides to take on a lady(who he falls in love with). The lady was supposed to be wed to someone else, so things get messed up. The movie goes through their lives and shows the final end. I would not bother seeing it though, I almost fell asleep.