User Reviews (97)

Add a Review

  • Fredda16 March 2004
    The first time I saw this movie, I fell in love. The second time around, I was already in love, watching it with my love who also fell in love and now we're all in love. All because of this movie.

    Set in New York, the movie deals with loneliness, different ways of coping or letting go, it deals with love, the yearning for it and also the fear of it, this magical feeling you almost don't dare hope for. The simple but genuine approach to these important themes makes the story stand out and makes you want to believe, because deep inside you already do.

    You can tell the movie is based on a play, primarily because of the special atmosphere created by the careful progression of the story, scene by scene, not to mention the wonderful and individual characters we get acquainted with. Both Michelle Pfeiffer and Al Pacino make outstanding performances and the on screen chemistry between the two is perfect.

    This is an absolute must see for all you dreamers out there, and if you ever come across the play, you probably should check that out as well. Remember, the elephant must face the window and a VCR will never be a substitute for love. Sit down with this movie, and I promise you, from the first shot of the Greyhound accompanied by Terence Trent D'Arby's wonderful title track, you'll never want it to end.
  • After their brief encounter in SCARFACE, Al Pacino and Michelle Pfeiffer were reunited for FRANKIE AND JOHNNY, a charming romantic comedy about an ex-con hired to work at a restaurant where he falls in love with one of the waitresses there. I absolutely love this move...Pacino has rarely been more sexy and appealing on screen and no matter how much they tried to make her look like a Plain Jane, Michelle Pfeiffer is just beautiful and also gives a very affecting performance as the repressed Frankie, afraid to release the love she has to give due to a troubled romantic past. Pacino and Pfeiffer make the most of a clever script, buoyed by Garry Marshall's sure-footed direction and solid comic support from Nathan Lane, Kate Nelligan (hysterically funny as another waitress at the restaurant) and Marshall's good luck charm, Hector Elizondo, as the restaurant owner. A warm romantic comedy with an unexpectedly quiet denouement.
  • Very pleasant love-story that wouldn't have been this good without the great performances by Pacino and Pfeiffer. Pacino is the cook with the romantic heart who just got out of jail (of course he wasn't a real criminal) starts working in a Greek restaurant and falls in love with Pfeiffer, the waitress, who just wants to watch videos and eat pizza after a few bad love-experiences. Pacino has to do a lot (read Romeo & Juliet, dance like a madman, chop vegetables and be very patient) to win her love and is finally helped by the sound of Debussy's 'Claire de Lune'.
  • You have to give the filmmakers credit: they did attempt to deglamorize Michelle Pfeiffer to fit into Kathy Bates' off-Broadway role of a waitress with no prospects who finds herself attracted to the new cook at the restaurant. Michelle's innate sparkle manages to shine through the dowdy clothes and plain-Jane appearance, and yet the miraculous thing is, her casting doesn't hurt the movie and her performance is one of the best things about "Frankie and Johnny". Pfeiffer and Al Pacino are a good screen match, and if they don't especially resemble the characters they're playing, they at least don't throw the tone out of whack (this is a Garry Marshall movie after all, so it's bound to have a bumpy narrative). Terrence McNally's play was about hard truths and sex on a low income; this is a big, charming commercial comedy-drama, directed with energy but no real flair. Pacino lays on the Prince Charming-pizazz a bit heavily, and Nathan Lane works overtime at being adorable as the proverbial gay best friend, but it certainly isn't a bad movie. It works on a certain level, even if it doesn't resemble reality or the original play. *** from ****
  • Love CAN be scary. Especally if you don't expect it. This movie is very good at describing how love can be. Fate can bring two people together. Believe in it. And how perfect the theme song Clair de Lune is. It's worth a listen. Love can happen....only if you believe in it.
  • In "Alice in Wonderland", Lewis Carroll popularised the word "uglification"- the act of making something more ugly. I think that this would be a useful word to describe the process whereby some of Hollywood's most beautiful actresses deliberately use make-up to mar their looks in the belief that they will not be taken seriously as actresses unless they do so. Yes, Nicole, I am thinking of you. And you, Charlize.

    The role of Frankie in "Frankie and Johnny" might seem to be a candidate for the uglification process, given that the character is supposed to be a plain and drab waitress and that the part went to Michelle Pfeiffer, probably (along with Kim Basinger) the loveliest Hollywood star of the eighties. Fortunately, this temptation was resisted. (I say "fortunately" because, unlike the Academy which handed out Oscars to the uglified Nicole Kidman and Charlize Theron, I am not impressed by that school of thought which equates beauty with shallowness). There is no attempt to hide Michelle's loveliness, even though Frankie is clearly a woman who makes little effort to enhance her looks, dressing dowdily and wearing little make-up.

    The film is not based on the well-known popular song about a woman who murders her unfaithful lover, although that song is referred to at several points. It is actually based on a play entitled "Frankie and Johnny in the Claire de Lune", shortened to something rather snappier for the film version, even though Debussy's beautiful piano piece still plays an important part. I have never seen the stage version- as far as I know it has never been put on in Britain- but the film, with its concentration on indoor scenes and greater emphasis on dialogue and character development than on physical action, clearly betrays its theatrical origins.

    Frankie is a waitress in a cheap New York diner; Johnny is the cook who has recently been released after serving a jail term for forgery. He learned to cook in prison (where he also acquired a love for Shakespeare and other classical literature) and has been given the job by Nick, the gruff but kindly owner, who believes in giving a man a second chance. Johnny falls in love with Frankie, and tries to persuade her to go out with him, but she is reluctant. It is clear that her reluctance stems from her having been hurt by some romantic disappointment in her past, although we never learn the full story. Eventually, however, she agrees to a date with him.

    This does not seem the most promising scenario for a film. Admittedly, "Marty", which told a similar romantic story about two ordinary New Yorkers, was a great success in the mid-fifties, but audiences in the nineties generally demanded more in the way of action. "Frankie and Johnny" works, however, because Pfeiffer and Al Pacino make us believe in their characters. Pacino gets the chance to show that he can shine in films other than crime dramas. Pfeiffer gets the chance to show here (as she was to do later in films like "The Age of Innocence" "What Lies Beneath" and "White Oleander") that she is a genuinely talented actress, not merely eye candy. They are well supported by some of the others in the cast, especially Hector Elizondo as Nick and Kate Nelligan as Frankie's colleague Cora. I was less taken with Nathan Lane as Frankie's gay friend and confidant, Tim, who seemed to have too much of the limp wrist about him.

    Director Garry Marshall is noted for his ability to bring out the best in his female stars; Goldie Hawn and Julia Roberts both gave one of their best performances in one of his films, Hawn in "Overboard" and Roberts in "Pretty Woman", and he seems to have done the same for Pfeiffer here. "Overboard" and "Pretty Woman" were both (although good examples of the genre), standard Hollywood rom-coms, based around a zany, and frequently implausible, screwball plot. "Frankie and Johnnie", although sometimes characterised as a romantic comedy, is a very different type of film, based on more realistic characters and situations and with a greater emphasis on the romantic rather than the comic elements. It shows that it is still possible to make an effective, and often touching, drama about the love of Mr and Ms Average. 7/10
  • Frankie (Michelle Pfeiffer) is an isolated waitress working at a greasy Manhattan diner with a cast of wacky characters. She's recovering from a bad marriage. Her best friend is gay neighbor Tim (Nathan Lane). Johnny (Al Pacino) recently got out of jail. Diner owner Nick (Héctor Elizondo) gives the ex-con a chance as the fry cook.

    There is a needed change when a romantic role written for Kathy Bates goes to Michelle Pfeiffer. The switch can be done smartly. Pfeiffer looks like a Hollywood starlet no matter how plain the makeup girls try to make her. The simple fix is every straight male character has to make a pass at her. It would be more believable and it would allow Frankie to reject every one of them. She would be alone by choice which fits her character perfectly. It's really weird when Pfeiffer asks why Pacino wants to go out with her. Get a mirror.

    If one ignores that problem, this is a pretty good romance with two of the best actors around. They deliver compelling performances. Pacino has a fun bit of prison sex. Pfeiffer's loneliness is palpable but her beauty does need acknowledgment by the movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This film is nice, it's just a simple, nice romance film, with a good story, however, Al Pacino is GENUINELLY A STALKER. His entire thing is him just following Michelle Pfeiffer's character around, finding out where she lives, forcing her to go to a party with him, not leaving her alone when she asks him multiple times to go away! While he is doing these creepy things for the right reasons, and in the film it does get him the girl, in real life all he would be getting is a restraining order. Even if it is slightly weird I recommend it if you like heartfelt, nice storys.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I'm surprised by the number of reviewers stating that this movie is on their Top 10 list; I thought it was an adequate story though it tried really hard to over play the will she/won't she angst of Michelle Pfeiffer's character. For Pacino, this was not in the Michael Corleone league, but his performance was generally up for the task. For a while there I thought Nick's (Hector Elizondo) daughter Pookie was going to have a larger role to play but I can't even find her name in the credits. Too bad, I thought there was something going on there.

    Usually in older films (and this one's not that old) I find myself making a mental note of things like the cost of merchandise relative to today's prices, so it was a bit of reverse shock to see Frankie (Pfeiffer) anxiously eyeing a VCR machine at the sale price of $199. If you can even find one today, it would be outdone by a DVD player for about thirty bucks. Just goes to show you how the advance of technology has made life better over time.

    My main disappointment with the film is that they never played the song 'Frankie and Johnny'. Granted, it might have been a downer since after all, Frankie pulled out that forty-four and plugged Johnny with it. But it doesn't sound all that bad when Sam Cooke tells the story.
  • This is one of the best romantic movies I have ever seen. It is not one of those movies that shows love in a fantasy world where there are no rules, this is real love in the real world. Michelle Pfeiffer gives one of her best performances on screen. this movie is not only about a cook who falls for a waitress, but it is about the fears and hesitations we all have in starting a new life. The director did a great job in setting the right environment for the movie, which gave it a real realistic touch. Al Pacino gave a good performance, but Michelle Pfeiffer was perfection. There is a line in the movie that says it all , when Pfeiffer and Al Pacino are in the same room, he says : "everything I want is in this room". Don't miss seeing real love in the real world. Don't miss seeing "Frankie and Johnny".
  • It was so good. I literally cry in every scene. Such a classic underrated masterpiece, now it's my favourite of Marshall's movies
  • Peach-210 December 1998
    This film has been overlooked by everyone I know and to me it was one of the best movies of 1991. I didn't think the chemistry between Al Pacino and Michelle Pfeiffer would be any good, but their on-screen romance was very enchanting. Garry Marshall did a great job directing this movie and Terrence McNally translated his play to screen beautifully. All the characters in this movie could have had a film of their own. My favorite character is Nathan Lane's portrayal of the gay neighbor. Lane is very funny and I love the way his character encourages Pfeiffer's character to fall in love. Falling in love can be dangerous, exciting, scary and blissful all in one night. This movie captures love in a way that made me feel really good.
  • MaximusXXX11 April 2021
    7/10
    Solid
    It's not amazing but Pacino fans will enjoy it. The point of the story is to present regular people in their mid years who want second chances at love.
  • Although I am a fan of both lead actors, I think that Al Pacino is not suitable in the role of a lover. He is simply too persuasive and while desperately trying to convince Frankie about his love he anticipates his upcoming brilliant performances as devil's advocate or merchand of Venice. The movies is saved by some humorous scenes and by Michelle Pfeiffer who plays the role of the lonely woman in her late 30's disappointed by love, but still hoping for the miracle in her life. Some of the dialogs seemed very unnatural in the context and the sex scene between those 2 is simply horrible IMHO. I got the feeling all of the time, that Frankie is trying to convince herself that this is it, just because she is out of options at her age, so she ultimately accepts this big mouth guy in her life. I am rating it 5 because of the failed romance due to Al's exhaustive talking and predictable "happy end".
  • This film is simply great. One of the reasons I like it is that here romance is not reduced to some sappy idealistic fable, but is instead shown as realistically as life itself. There are no fantastic events or stretches of plausibility here. Just great performances and a well-written story. In short, this is what real movie-making is all about.
  • Anais796 August 2010
    OK, i do love romantic comedies and i'm not ashamed of it. And this one is really, really lovely. It's a little bitter but with a nice sense of houmour as well. Michelle Pfeiffer is delicate as always and Al Pacino... well... everything he does is so great!!! Even if he plays a role in an unpretentious comedy like this one. It sounds a bit strange for me the fact i like Pacino so much, 'cause he's the most academic actor we have nowadays (together with De Niro, off course), but he's got such a charisma that makes me forget that man is the Actor's Studio itself. Anyway if you want to spend a lighthearted evening, Frankie & Johnny is the right movie.
  • Frankie (Michelle Pfeiffer) is a down-on-her-luck waitress in New York City. She lives with a gay roommate (Nathan Lane) who has a partner, but she still can't manage to find anyone.

    Johnny (Al Pacino) has just been released from prison and lands a job at a small diner in NYC. The same diner where Frankie works.

    Frankie and Johnny embark on a relationship that is predictable but enjoyable.

    The film was directed by Garry Marshall, perhaps the king of the sappy romantic comedies, and this one works about as well as any of his movies. Suffice to say if you enjoy romantic films you'll like this - it's sweet-natured, amiable and enjoyable. The performances are a highlight, and as a trivia note, it was Pacino's second pairing with Pfeiffer since the film "Scarface" almost a decade prior.

    3/5.
  • After their "romance" in 'Scarface' they (Pacino and Pfeiffer) decide to have a real romance, and it is a pretty good one. Not that the film is great but in this kind of films all I hope for is a little chemistry, some nice characters and a few laughs. This film has it all.

    The chemistry between Al Pacino (Johnny) and Michelle Pfeiffer (Frankie) works because in the movie they have to fight for that chemistry. Al Pacino is a great actor but I think Michelle Pfeiffer was better here. Although I loved a couple of particular scenes with Pacino (his Greek-dance-scene is great) I think the character of Michelle Pfeiffer has more depth and she does exactly the right thing for that character. And of course she is a beautiful woman. You must love her.

    The nice characters, besides Frankie and Johnny, are the gay neighbour (Nathan Lane), the boss of the restaurant where almost the whole cast is working (Hector Elizondo) and Nedda and Cora (Jane Morris and Kate Nelligan), two of the waitresses.

    The story is simple. Johnny is just released from prison and he starts working in the restaurant where Frankie happens to be a waitress. He falls in love and although she has trouble to admit it she is doing the same thing. Of course there are some (a lot of) complications on the way but you know how it is going to end. A nice feel-good movie.
  • jboothmillard13 September 2007
    Warning: Spoilers
    It is quite rare you see Al Pacino in a film that doesn't involve crime or drugs, and this was the second time he and Michelle Pfeiffer had worked with each other, 8 years since Scarface, and from director Garry Marshall (Beaches, Pretty Woman, Runaway Bride). Anyway, basically Johnny (Pacino) has just been released from prison, and after a while he gets a job in a Greek family's restaurant. There he meets waitress Frankie (Golden Globe nominated Pfeiffer), a woman who looks like she isn't happy with all her life. It takes a little while before she agrees to go on a date with him, but after a while it is clear that they are destined to be together. There is a point where Frankie feels lost in her monotony, and I think something to do with Johnny married, or just him unable to convince her of his feelings, but the ending where both of them listen to the radio, while both of them are brushing their teeth, to hear the song "Frankie & Johnny" (Johnny mentioned the coincidence), and she eventually gives in and the film ends happily. Also starring Hector Elizondo as Nick, Nathan Lane as Tim, BAFTA nominated Kate Nelligan as Cora, Jane Morris as Nedda, Greg Lewis as Tino, Al Fann as Luther, Glenn Plummer as Peter, Sean O'Bryan as Bobby, Fernando López as Jorge, Ele Keats as Artemis, Phil Leeds as Mr. DeLeon, K Callan as Frankie's Mother and Shannon Wilcox as Christine the Hooker. A nice romantic drama, with tiny giggles (probably not intentional) thrown in. Very good!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Al Pacino, Michelle Pfeiffer, Nathan Lane, Kate Nelligan and Hector Elizondo star in Garry Marshall's 1991 romance comedy-drama based on a play, "Frankie and Johnny in the Clair De Lune." This takes place in New York where we meet Johnny (Pacino), an ex-con who gets a job working as a short-order cook. We also meet waitress, Frankie (Pfeiffer) who is afraid of starting over because of her past, abusive marriage. Johnny also had a failed marriage, but when he meets Frankie, he instantly falls for her. She's reserved at first, but eventually tries to move on with him. Lane (The Birdcage) plays Frankie's neighbor friend, Tim, Nelligan (Dracula) plays waitress, Cora and Elizondo (Pretty Woman) plays boss, Nick. This is a pretty good romance flick that also references the love song. Pacino & Pfeiffer not only reunite 8 years after "Scarface," but are good in this and have great chemistry. I recommend this.
  • with an excellent performance as a waitress in a down-at-heel coffee shop in NYC. Sounds unlikely, but she actually adapts to the role. Having seen "Dangerous Minds", which was a good film, but somehow she didn't fit that role. "Frankie and Johnny" is a great film to watch; I happened to watch it after a bad day, and it does take you out of your own problems.

    Pacino plays a man just released from prison, who lost his wife and child to another man, trying to remake his life; this was based on a play by the same name, "Frankie and Johnny in the Claire De Lune" and basically addresses loneliness and isolation, even in a city as overcrowded as NY.

    I wish Pfeiffer had done more of these roles. She was so often used as a decoration, her acting ability was not allowed to standout ("Scarface", "Witches of Eastwick") etc. She was also very good in "White Oleander" an excellent film based on the novel by Janet Fitch.

    Overall this film is particularly good if you are having problems in your life, and happen to watch this basic story of people, how they stay isolated, how they eventually find each other and a commonality in their life. It is also not an over the top romantic comedy, so it has credibility. 10/10.
  • The main reason why I watched this movie was because Al Pacino and Michelle Pfeiffer were in it. Nothing could go wrong with these two actors in it, this would be a masterpiece like I had never seen before, no? Well, no. I'm not saying it is a bad movie, but it just wasn't as great as I hoped it would be.

    It tells the story of Johnny (Al Pacino), a lonely middle-aged man who just got out of prison and who gets a job as a cook in a restaurant owned by a Greek family. In this restaurant he meets Frankie (Michelle Pfeiffer), who's a waitress in the restaurant. She is a bit of a loner who doesn't seem like she needs a man in her life. But that's not what Johnny thinks. He has fallen in love with her head over heels and he won't take no for an answer. He'll keep asking her out until she finally admits...

    As I said, this isn't a bad movie, but it just didn't always convince me of its quality. Somehow I missed something in this movie or perhaps it was the fact that Johnny worked on my nerves with his eternal begging for a moment of Frankie's attention. Anyway, the performances were OK, but the story could have been a lot better (although I liked the surprising ending). I give this movie a 7/10. It's worth a watch, but it isn't great cinema.
  • CineMan-813 October 1998
    Frankie and Johnny is one of the best love stories in the history of cinema. The scipt is excellent and all the performances are superb. Pacino and Pfeiifer seem to be made for each other, while all the supporting roles are equally impressive.But the most important element of this picture is that it is truly realistic. We can at last identify ourselves in this movie. It's a movie about real people not about cinderella-like characters that once thay find love are happy. Frankie and Johnny fall in love but can't stop being hurt by this love. They are two every day characters that live in today's world and face their lives and problems with realism. With a pessimistic mood Frankie refuses to fall in love as she is afraid she'll get hurt, while Johnny thinks that the only thing that can give a tone of optimism and satisfaction in his life is Frankie. In short. Frankie and Johnny is a delightful picture that no one should miss.
  • I was let down after viewing this movie recently. I know that romance movies aren't usually Al Pacino's area and in my opinion, it shows in this movie. He (Pacino) and Frankie have absolutely no chemistry at all. It was like they were forced into these roles and had no joy in doing them at all. Michelle Pfiefer is on auto-pilot as she drags like molasses throughout the entire flick. I've never been a big fan of her films and this is definitely NOT one of them. Come on, Al, you're a darn fine actor! What on god's green earth were you thinking when you agreed to sign on for this movie. $$$$ is the real answer, of course. I'm sure I don't blame him, but I just don't buy into his character at all. He's not convincing at all. Stick to mafia movies, Al, it's what you do best. Carlito's Way, Godfather, Scarface, Dog Day Afternoon, Donnie Brasco, all movies MUCH better than this one was. Even Scent of a Woman, Simone, The Recruit were much better. Pacino is one of my all time favorite actors, but this movie is crap. This is my opinion and I'm sticking to it like a feather on Big Bird's big #$*)ing back! 1/2 * out of 4 *'s
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Frankie and Johnny prove that great actors + great performance does not = good movie.

    The entire film is centered around Johnny (Al Pacino) courting Frankie (Michelle Pfeiffer)after having met while working in a diner together. Johnny is recently out of prison, and takes the job as a short order cook while Frankie is an established waitress at the diner. From the very beginning Johnny comes on strong to Frankie, and she rejects him constantly throughout the entire film.

    I could see how this may seem romantic to some; a criminal trying to start a new life and is willing to jump through hoops to please the pretty woman while she plays hard to get. But this film fails to deliver. The constant rejection grows tiresome, as the majority of the film is centered around Pacino giving long-winded explanations as to why the two should be together, with Pfeiffer summarily dismissing his onslaught of justifications and excuses. Every scene is almost identical; Johnny makes Frankie smile, they do something together, Frankie rejects Johnny, they break up, and then Johnny goes back to trying to win the girl over... again and again ad naseum. Once you've seen this first cycle happen, then you know exactly what will happen 3 or 4 times that will become the filler for the rest of the film.

    The performance of the actors is excellent. They deliver their lines well and do a good job portraying ordinary every day people. However, I fault the writing as the film is very contradictory. For example, I don't find it to be romantic that they're going to have sex on the first date, and then have a big blowup because he didn't have any condoms and instead they opt for a sandwich. I don't find it romantic that from almost the very beginning Johnny is talking about how they were always destined to be together, and talks about love, marriage, and kids before the two really know each other. It's just flat out creepy.

    Furthermore, it seems ridiculous that Frankie would be intolerant towards Johnny showing up at her bowling league night, yet passively accepting that Johnny sleeps with one of their co-workers.

    The film isn't romantic because it's a one-sided relationship up until the very end, well, supposedly. The end of the film has Frankie passively accepting Johnny into her life, but she already did this three or four times earlier in the movie and then backed out later on. This film isn't about two people being in love or finding one another, rather it resembles one person being in love and convincing the other through sheer repetition to submit.

    The film shouldn't be considered an art film either because it lacks creativity, has horrible writing, and furthermore obviously tries to sell itself by employing big name actors to deliver small time characters.

    The lives of the characters are unremarkable, there are no real events or twists to the movie, and there is no real comedy. What we're left with is two boring people; one trying to convince the other one to commit, the other continually rejecting him throughout the entire film. Furthermore, there was little chemistry between the actors, possibly because Pfeiffer did so well at acting almost completely disinterested in Pacino for most of the film.

    This is by far the worst movie I've ever seen, and I'm surprised that the film makers would be willing to spend top dollar on top actors all the while presenting us with a miserable excuse for a love story that should have never been in film, print, or any other media to begin with.
An error has occured. Please try again.