User Reviews (296)

Add a Review

  • This movie was great and enjoyable back in 1991 and still is so even today. There is just that something unique about the chemistry between comedians Dan Aykroyd, John Candy and Chevy Chase.

    The story is about four upscale people whom are caught for traffic violations in Valkenvania and are brought for immediate sentencing before the eccentric judge Alvin Valkenheiser. And soon the day turns into a real nightmare.

    While "Nothing But Trouble" is not the type of comedy that will split you open from excessive laughing, then there is just something Classic about the entire movie; be it the mood and absurdity of the story, the hilarious and outrageous characters, or the fact that Dan Aykroyd, John Candy and Chevy Chase were just a great combination, I do not know. But I do know that this movie is entertaining.

    The movie does bear itself as watchable more than once. And if you are a fan of Dan Aykroyd, John Candy or Chevy Chase, then "Nothing But Trouble" is a must watch.
  • view_and_review25 March 2020
    6/10
    Wacky
    This is probably the wackiest movie I've ever seen Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase in, and to have them collaborate on this, of all movies, was a bit strange. The whole thing was odd. The very idea that some small village in the middle of New Jersey exists almost like the Bermuda Triangle where crooks and criminals go in and never leave is something from a horror movie. Then, along with the strange characters in this village of Valkenvania, a music video breaks out from Digital Underground: shout out to 2Pac.

    This script was written by Peter Aykroyd, Brother to Dan Aykroyd. Peter wrote a couple of goodies in "Spies Like Us" and "Coneheads," but this one seemed more like a teenage science experiment whereby he just mixed a bunch of random elements hoping for a grand explosion but getting nothing but a fizzle.
  • Finally watched this movie last year after finding a DVD copy out in the wild.

    My last attempt was in the late 90s when I was 13 years old and I caught an airing on TV. I was a huge fan of John Candy, Chevy Chase AND Dan Aykroyd, so I was pumped about this one, but it ended up being too weird for me and I tuned out after about 30 minutes.

    This time however, I understood it much more and ended up really enjoying it from beginning to end. Chevy Chase is just killing it with the one-liners, John Candy stealing the show as a by-the-book cop AND his sister, and let's not forget Dan Aykroyd being the jack-of-all-trades as co-writer, producer, director and actor (also in a dual role, in heavy make-up no less).

    Shame it bombed at the box-office, but I can understand why audiences didn't get it in '91, probably the same reason my 13-year-old self turned it off 30 minutes in: we weren't expecting those comedians we love so much to be in such a DARK comedy. It definitely was ahead of its time...

    I can't help but wonder what Aykroyd's original cut was like, before any studio interference, and back when it was still titled "Valkenvania". He had planned for it to be more of a horror film with comedic elements, until Warner Bros demanded he make it a comedy with horror elements.

    Either way, I enjoyed the final product, and recommend it to anyone who hasn't seen it.

    A review by Jex Russell.
  • If your idea of a dark comedy is something like "Beetlejuice" or "Deathtrap" or "Heathers", then watch out. This one makes them look like Peewee's Playhouse.

    You know how certain horror movies cross over into comedy? Like when Freddy Krueger says "Welcome to prime time b!tch!!" and slams a girl's head into the TV? Well, this is the opposite: comedy crossing over into horror. It gets pretty weird, and if you're not expecting it, it can be downright upsetting.

    I think that's what makes so many people hate this movie. With an all-star comedic cast like it has, it promises to be a laugh riot like the DVD cover says. I was expecting something like "Ghostbusters" meets "Fletch" meets "Summer Rental". Instead it's more like "Planes, Trains & Automobiles" meets "Deliverance". In other words the comedy is very low-key, not quite enough to offset the disturbing story.

    Dan Akroyd, who plays a sadistic murdering judge, is just plain frightening. John Candy, who plays the sympathetic policeman, gives the story an air of tragedy. Chevy Chase is his usual wisecracking self, but it can't compete with the horror & violence of the plot (being trapped in a hicktown house while people are getting brutally murdered all around you). You really have to be ready for it, otherwise you might end up traumatized. The "Bonestripper" scene will give lifelong nightmares to any kid under the age of 12, as well as impressionable adults.

    But now that you've been warned, perhaps you'll be able to take it in stride. I'm not sure if writer Dan Akroyd intended this to be so nightmarish, but it sure is. Definitely a one-of-a-kind. NOT for young kids!!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In 1991 – actually, starting back in 1988, I made it my mission to watch as many movies as I could. I loved going to the cinema and literally seeing everything. And yet, in early 1991, I decidedly avoided Nothing But Trouble.

    Damn, I must've been a smart kid.

    This movie was so richly bad, so incredibly awful, so repulsive and so spiteful of the human race, it should never had been made. Hell, it didn't know at any point if it wanted to be a comedy, horror or both and never settled in on any genre.

    Basically, Chevy Chase's Chris agrees to take both an obnoxious and absolutely appalling couple of nitwits and Demi Moore's Diane to Atlantic City from New York but get sidetracked when they run a stop sign. Apparently, this is the end all to all sin in this small town on the way to the Eastern gambling destination.

    Once they get caught and led to the local judge, the movie title kicks in.

    In honesty and all that is good, I watched this train wreck of a disgusting and horrifyingly bad movie because the hilarious How Did This Get Made podcast covered it and I needed to see it before I listened to their show.

    After seeing this mess, this repulsive pile of sh|t, get progressively worse – think Garbage Pail Kids: The Movie Part II, you truly wonder if any one, at any time, thought any of this was a good idea.

    But, if you must see this pointless, aimless and poorly written romp, at very least listen to the How Did This Get Made podcast following. At least you'd finally get a good laugh out of this time wasted.

    * * * Final thoughts: I remember the only two positives I saw during this: Demi looked amazing! and I was impressed with the 1991 technology. I mean, who knew they had GPS in cars in 1991?

    Now, think about it. Are those two positives worth wasting another 94 minutes of your life over?
  • Take a moment to realize that a long time ago, comedy legends Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase made a movie so unspeakably bad that its almost impossible to watch. A movie so grotesque in nature that it just sits there on screen like turd burning in the hot sun. This movie is called, Nothing But Trouble, and its buried in cinematic obscurity, but for all the right reasons. Whats even more insulting is the fact that Dan Aykroyd actually wrote and directed this picture, as if this was the movie he was dreaming to get made. He must have been on some strong dope. Here, he plays a deteriorating old man with a penis shaped nose who stands as the justice of the peace of a rural northeastern town. Among his family is a duo of mentally challenged mutant toad- humanoids and John Candy in drag. Not to mention, the whole area surrounding them is a toxic waste dump complete with dead corpses. Essentially, you are looking at a parody of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre, minus everything that could have been potentially funny about a Texas Chainsaw parody. Its pure bunk, plain and simple. For those of you who are fans of this picture, God bless you, because I couldn't find a damn thing likable about this putrid mess. Yes, I know its supposed to be surreal and gross. If they wanted to really do that they should have hired David Lynch.
  • Dan Aykroyd supposedly has an affinity, almost a fetish, for collecting bizarre little gadgets and oddities that don't serve any particular purpose other than just to sit there so he and his friends can goof on them. After seeing this movie, I can believe that, because that pretty much describes this movie to a T. "A good cast wasted" is an understatement; EVERYTHING is wasted here--time, film, you name it. The paper the script was written on would have served a more useful purpose in wrapping fish--which may well be exactly what happened, because my God does this thing stink. The whole movie is one long Rube Goldberg contraption, except that, unlike Goldberg's gizmos, this isn't amusing, funny, clever, or anything else other than painful. I've often wondered after seeing a particularly headache-inducing piece of cinematic bilge if the people who made it had any idea of how bad it was going to be when they were shooting it. After seeing this, I can't believe that anyone who participated in this atrocity didn't know how bad it was going to be BEFORE they shot it. Maybe they figured, "Hey, it's Dan Aykroyd, he'll think up something funny." That's like being told you need brain surgery and that your surgeons are going to be Johnny Knoxville and Tom Green, and figuring, "Well, that's OK, they'll learn brain surgery before the operation."

    The only even remotely amusing bits in this movie belong to John Candy as both a cop and his sister (!), and that's due solely to Candy's ability to make a silk purse out of a sow's droppings. Take everybody else's word for it, and avoid this brain-rotting fungus like the plague that it is.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Nothing But Trouble (1991)

    3/4

    This is one of the most hated films of all time. It's seemed to work up a cult following over the years, and I think it is perfectly represented in that genre; it's a film so weird and sick that it has to be seen to be believed. Like I specified, this was one of the most negatively reviewed films of its time, and upon release, earned a spot with other legendary cinematic disasters. It doesn't deserve to be with those films. Now, granted, this movie is not perfect; it's far from it. But for my money, it's entertaining to see these people on the screen, and kind of fun.

    The movie stars Dan Aykroyd as an absolutely insane judge Alvin Valkenheiser, Chevy Chase as uptight businessman Chris Thorne, Demi Moore as Diane Lightson, and John Candy as sheriff Denis and the Judge's granddaughter, Eldona (John Candy in drag). And if you thought that's bizarre, I'm just getting started. In the film, we follow Chris Thorne, as he agrees to drive his new neighbor Diane Lightson to Atlantic City; along the way, an obnoxious Brazilian couple Fausto and Renalda join them. On the journey, they run a stop sign in the small town of Valkenvania and are arrested and brought against their will to the Judge's house (a marvel of set design - the decorators gathered all the junk that they could find; crushed cars, old toasters, etc). Things become out of control as the couples try to escape the crazy antics and booby traps, while also trying not to get caught. Oh yeah, John Candy is also in drag and Dan Aykroyd plays a giant baby who guards the house. You read that correctly. I originally wrote about this film's bizzaro story; to which I stated that "If you look at it as a comedy, it's one of the greatest disasters in the history of film. But if you look at it as a farce, it's pretty entertaining." I would say that perfectly sums up the film. But enough talking about it; it must be seen to be believed. It's that insane.

    Now, to the reception. NO ONE liked this film. Part of its major flaw is the weird direction that Aykroyd takes, it's too weird to suit the material. Then again the whole thing is so weird that it was his own fault.

    This film also has an interesting reason behind it; it was in production during a chaotic time; Warner Bros was supervising the disastrous production of the adaption of Tom Wolfe's The Bonfire of the Vanities, which was having extreme trouble getting made. Warner Bros. Was sure they had a hit with Nothing But Trouble, because after all, the cast was excellent. They gave the film 40 million dollars, which Aykroyd burned through like wildfire. When it was shown to the studio, they were curious to see where the film went, as they had not been supervising it. They hated it. It was too dark and was guaranteed an R rating, which the studio didn't want. They fought and fought, and finally the film was released to some of the most negative critical reception ever for a film. It would later be stomped on by the box office; only making roughly 8.5 million on 40 million. It's since become one of the biggest bombs of all time.

    I don't think it's that bad; it doesn't make my favorites, but I enjoy it for what it is. It's a cult movie, which doesn't always mean disaster.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    With the number of interesting, funny actors in this film, I went into the movie theater with high hopes. Within the first few minutes of the film, these hopes were gone. This movie was simply not funny. The plot did not flow very smoothly and the twists did not bring so much as a chuckle. My Dad and I ended up walking out of this movie. To put my comments in context, the only other movie I've walked out of is "The Crow". I've enjoyed all of the other movies that I've seen with these actors. I'd really like to get into specifics about why I rate this movie so low, but I'm afraid I'd give away some spoilers. Believe me when I say that if you watch this movie expecting to be entertained you will be sorely disappointed. If you're tempted to rent this movie, find something that is actually funny. For instance "Oscar" staring Sylvester Stallone.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    'Nothing but Trouble' has enjoyed an infamous reputation as an all-time stinker. I have to disagree because it seems as if this film is able to boil passions so it must be of some worth. It certainly doesn't surprise me that people hate it nor does it surprise me that it has a cult following. 'Nothing but Trouble' is a movie that makes the boldest of choices and I kind of love it.

    This is a Trojan horse of a movie. The great Dan Aykroyd was able to leverage his reputation to get to make whatever he wanted. Warner expecting another 'Ghostbusters' were treated to something else entirely. Instead of a quirky special effects comedy we got something ugly and twisted. The question becomes do we credit or condemn Aykroyd. I fall somewhere in the middle. 'Nothing But Trouble' advertises it's self as a horror-comedy in the tradition of 'Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein'. I'm sure you would predict walking in that Aykroyd would succeed at the comedy and have trouble with the horror but the opposite is true. Any joy one gets out of 'Nothing But Trouble' will come from embracing it's macabre bizarre qualities and not it's humor.

    This is a film cast with comedy heavy hitters but it doesn't have a laugh in it. I don't think the talent is wasted though. Chevy Chase, Demi Moore, and John Candy are never tongue in cheek when the film puts our characters in danger. They all play the horror straight. Aykroyd is insanely over the top. He is obviously hamming it up but even this doesn't hurt the film. It's loud in the right way.

    You would think a horror-comedy not being funny would be a fatal flaw and some may argue that it is. What Aykroyd gets right through is the horror. This is one of the most colorful horror films of its era. It has a personality and visual style that is so striking that it stays with you. Aykroyd spares no expense to bring his twisted imagination to the screen. Tobe Hooper or Wes Craven could never get the resources and money Aykroyd was able to. The setting is a character it's self. The mansion and torture devices are intricate to the last detail. This film is a triumph of set design. It should have been nominated for an Academy Award.

    'Nothing But Trouble' is anything but bland. If the main goal of a horror film is to disturb then 'Nothing But Trouble' is a resounding success. Who can forget the infamous hot dog scene? Or Bobo and Lil' Debbil? I've read reviews comparing it to a nightmare and yes that is accurate. I can't help but take a little pleasure in the fact that Aykroyd snuck it through.
  • I'm giving it a 4, because I don't mind the first half. But that's all I have ever ended up watching. Once the 2 mutant babies show up, I'm out. Probably the only thing I have ever seen in a movie as jarringly annoying as Jar Jar Binks.

    But with that said, there was potential.

    If Aykroyd had kept the general premise - 'city folks stuck in the nightmare of a rural county and a menacing judge, lost in time' - but instead made it a serious scary picture, it could have been really good.

    He basically pigeonholed himself, by trying to shoehorn a comedy into the concept; based upon what he was used to doing.

    Even with what he ended up doing, he could have made it better.

    Candy in drag as the sister was a horrible choice.

    The hot dog train was a horrible choice.

    Obviously, the mutant babies were a horrible choice.

    It's like someone needed to tell him, "there's a difference between silly and stupid. Silly is watchable. Stupid is not."
  • This is another underrated horror comedy from yesteryear. The movie is just weird and wonky. Dan Akroyd wrote, directed and stars along with Demi Moore ( G.I Jane), Chevy Chase (Fletch) and the late, great John Candy (Uncle Buck) in dual roles. The movie concerns a smarmy yuppie (Chase), the girl he's interested in (Moore) a couple of foreign rich kids and an I'll fated road trip where they are pulled over for running a stop sign and imprisoned by a strange judge and his ghoulish family. They spend the movie trying to escape wacky traps and death. The movie is weird, imaginative and bursting with creativity. Its definitely not for everyone it bombed with critics and audiences alike when it was initially released. But it's aged quite well and is definitely deserved of being a cult classic.

    Budget: $40m Domestic Box Office: $8m Worldwide Box Office: $8m

    3.75/5
  • DAN AYKROYD is a comedy genius & legend & here he has directed his one & only movie & it's just so much fun!!! It got so much hate & yet it's just pure fun from a comedy genius!!! A crazy old man who Aykroyd plays, we have the other comedy king CHEVY CHASE who is always fun to watch & dan Aykroyds close buddy in real life is great here & we have the BRILLIANT JOHN CANDY who also is fantastic & a comic genius & an all round good cast & good characters. Aykroyd done a great job directing & his movie is a good fun & very inventive Comedy Thriller!!! Never follow critics just like & enjoy what you like, i do.

    Now with that being said i do get that this is a bizarre & weird film as it sits between silly comedy & dark horror Thriller & it tried to get that "Beetlejuice" vibe going & in a way it did but obviously won't ever be a Classic like Tim Burtons Masterpiece.

    Dan Aykroyd is a childhood hero of mine, i grew up watching him in the Classic "Ghostbusters films" & "Trading Places" & "Spies Like Us" & "Coneheads" & "Celtic Pride" & "My Stepmother Is an Alien" & "Dragnet" & "My Girl" & "The Great Outdoors" & others, it's safe to say Aykroyd is a guy that has always been there making me laugh through my childhood & teens & still today as a family man, i love Aykroyd!!!!

    Aykroyd is a Genius as a writer, actor & of creative mind, i think he's the smartest of all the actors & his Classic work proves it.

    For a first movie & a big studio production i think Aykroyd's Wacky & weird Horror-Comedy "Nothing But Trouble" is a misunderstood Cult Classic, it's supposed to be strange & freaky & bizarre, it came from the incredibly creative mind of a comic genius & it's alot of fun!!!

    Aykroyd puts in a fantastic & manic performance here as the wacky old timer judge of his corrupted land, a monster of this nightmare like fantasy world that is dark but also ridiculously fun.

    Chevy Chase is his sarcastic & silly self (Always loved Chase) & is in a good lead role & even Demi Moore is fine here & John Candy r.i.p is always a joy to see him being silly on screen, a great cast in fact.

    The look is incredible with amazing cinematography by the best in the business DEAN CUNDY & the sets & production design is incredible, the detail of the set pieces is Amazing to look at, the mansion is beautiful & makes the film come off feeling like a big fun wild roller coaster ride.

    Bizarre yes but still fun & very entertaining.
  • I believe the venerable movie critic Leslie Haliwell sums this film up best: "...exceeding dismal comedy in which a group of self-indulgent comedians, having been given a great deal of rope, proceed to hang themselves; it is not a pretty sight." Variety says, "Astonishingly poor effort...the longest 94 minutes on record." Ken Newman, of 'Sight and Sound,' claims this was an "absolute failure as a comedy..." This is truly and without exception or doubt the worst film ever produced. I have encouraged many to see this film if for no other reason than to know just how awful a film can truly be. Ironically, the film was written by an arguably intelligent team (the brothers Aykroyd) and starred four usually reliable actors: Chevy Chase, Dan Aykroyd, Demi Moore, and the late John Candy. How then could a production go so disastrously wrong? You really have to see it to believe how bad it is. The ONLY redeeming quality (the ONLY reason I could even give it one point other than the fact that IMDB won't let you give it a zero) was the entertaining scene where Digital Underground performed in the courthouse. That's it. That's the only possibility of redemption in the worst film ever realized in American cinema. ANYONE who cares to argue this critique is MORE than welcome to email me at ... though I feel certain that I won't be hearing from anyone.
  • This flick has just the right mixture of stupid, funny, gross, disturbing, and completely off the wall. And most importantly, it was reviled by the critics, big qualifier there. If this was a midnight movie, I'd go see it. It would be great to occupy the after hours.
  • I agree with the consensus. Burn the negatives. This is right up there with GIGLI as one of the absolute worst films ever made. I can hang with something like WEEKEND AT BERNIE'S which knows how dumb it is. But this... my god, I felt like I had just bathed in manure after watching it on HBO the other night. It made me feel icky and embarrassed and resentful all at once. I'm just amazed that, despite the clout of then-stars Ackroyd, Chase, and Candy, this POS ever was greenlit in the first place. It's an absolute trainwreck; NOTHING about it works! And again, other movies are actually humorous and a bit charming, even, because they are so flawed. SILENT NIGHT, DEADLY NIGHT comes to mind. And WEEKEND AT BERNIE'S too. But not this. This fails in every way imaginable.
  • I'm not one to criticize movies much...I like to give all movies a chance and like to look for the good in all of them, but really...this has got to be the worse movie I've EVER seen...honestly...The title basically says it all. My father bought this movie because of the actors in it, who were supposed great comedians, and because it was cheap. 1 word: disappointing...I have never watched such a lame, grotesque, pointless, boring movie...list goes on. Don't waste your time watching this, we didn't even finish it 'cus it was so horrible, and I think we ended out throwing the DVD away.

    My rating, 0 of 10...if that's even possible...

    ~Ange Doré~
  • Tyypo27 January 2007
    Count me among those who thought this movie a complete disaster. I'll not summarize, as this has been done many times. I watched this movie on cable, waiting for it to pay off in some way. I mean, it HAD to get better - no one would intentionally make a movie this thoroughly unredeemable. In the end, I felt like I needed a long hot shower. It's been years, but it still hasn't washed off yet. The title has become a word used to mean "the very standard of badness" in any topic with friends familiar with the film.

    An irony: This movie would fit right into a segment of Leonard Pinth Garnell's "Bad Cinema." Those familiar with SNL know of what I speak.

    Some may very well like it. To them I say enjoy yourselves, but please do not actually recommend the film to anyone. You'll just cause further pain and lose considerable respect from your peers.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I look up all of the movies I watch on IMDb, and I'm surprised that this one is so disliked. I think the main reason is that with a cast of such comedy legends as Chevy Chase, Dan Aykroyd and John Candy, people were expecting a more conventional comedy. Most of their audience was probably expecting something along of the lines of "The Couch Trip", "Delirious" or "Fletch". I think people like me, who appreciate campy horror films like "2001 Maniacs", "The Butcher" and any of the "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" series, are more likely to find some humor in this film.

    Thanks to the remarkably bland title, I had no idea that this was a comedy with a horror twist when I found it on a cable channel. The completely pointless start of the film, which involves a party and some sort of talk of some sort of business deal, also doesn't hint at what the film is really about. It isn't until the protagonists get arrested that all of the fun starts.

    What follows is something in between comedy and horror. It skews more towards horror, with tons of gross-out scenes thanks to Dan Aykroyd's various grotesque characters. There are tons of bones, but not a lot of blood. Unlike conventional horror movies, where body-counts are generally in the double digits, only one group of ne'er-do-wells end up slaughtered over the course of the film. Even the two annoying ancillary characters who are along for the ride, who would be dead meat in any real horror film, end up getting a reprieve and a happy ending.

    By far the strangest part, and my personal favorite, is the musical performance in the middle of the film. When I saw a limo pulling up in a scene halfway through the film, I thought, okay here come some more victims. I was surprised to say the least that the occupants of the vehicle turned out to be the entire Digital Underground crew, including the instantly recognizable Shock G (aka Humpty Hump)! Instead of being murdered, they all perform a song (unfortunately not their one major hit, the far superior "Humpty Hump"). You can even see the late-great Tupac Shakur as one of the members of Digital Underground, before he started his solo career. I would recommend this film to anyone just for this surreal moment, but if you have no idea who Tupac or Digital Underground are then you probably won't enjoy it as much.

    After a few fake endings and the actual goofy cartoon ending, the movie is over. All in all, it doesn't have that many laughs, and it's definitely not scary, but it is rarely boring. The Digital Underground cameo is excellent and the cast plays their roles well. This is certainly not the best movie I've seen, but I would rank it better than any bad comedy and most bad horror movies. In fact, I'd say this film is just a few buckets of blood and a few crazy gross-out scenes away from a cult classic.
  • vonnoosh11 August 2022
    Akroyd and Chase made alot of truly dreadful comedies in their middle age though that is not all their fault. Studio executives during this period were insisting that comedies never be rated R like Caddyshack or Stripes. They believed that adults didn't go see comedies anymore without their kids so moviemakers had alot of restrictions imposed on them by their bosses. I suppose we can blame the success of John Hughes' family friendly comedies for that but the result is how lousy other movies end up being after they were ruined by the demands of studio heads who have no talent, just greed. The irony is how badly most of these movies ended up doing at the box office anyway.

    This is a stupid movie but it doesn't try not to be stupid. It is deliberately absurd and I think it would be a genuine cult classic if it had content that landed it an R rating when it was released. Instead, they make the greasy diaper wearing inbred looking grandkids lovable instead of disturbing, John Candy's portrayal as the mute sister to John Candy's cop vaguely menacing. That could have gone alot further. Valri Broomfield's role could have been like her role in Needful Things if it were rated R. An abrasive, abusive character capable of virtually any evil (much like most of the characters in that story) but also comedically over the top bringing in black comedy. There are no kids or teens in this movie so why try for a PG-13???? That's the same awful mistake all those lousy Police Academy sequels made. The only good one of those was the first movie, the only one rated R.
  • Chevy Chase, Dan Akroyd, John Candy, and the Humpty Hump.

    Enough said.
  • This is one of the worst pieces of film I have EVER in my life watched, and I have sat through lots of hours of film. I will even give Eraserhead credit as an art film, because of the definition that true art will trigger some visceral reaction in the viewer, be it disgust, admiration, love, laughter . . . in the case of Eraserhead it was total disgust. In the case of Nothing But Trouble . . . I vote for the Nothing. It is truly hard to believe that such a great talented cast could still not rescue such an abominable piece of film. So much wasted talent and money, and all those cumulative life-hours of all those viewers.

    If you feel you must see this, this belongs at the very bottom of your Netflex queue, when there is absolutely nothing else left to watch--your time is worth way more than this.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Made on a forty million dollar budget (virtually none of which was recovered), which is all up there on the screen, this extraordinarily unpopular movie is most definitely one for the connoisseur. Dan Akroyd's admirers will enjoy it too. In fact, director Akroyd gives actor Alroyd perhaps a wee too much attention, but Chevy Chase has a good innings too, and I've nothing but praise for the super-lovely Demi Moore and prolific TV actress/writer Valri Bromfield, here making one of her few movie appearances. And as for the sets, to say they are mind-boggling would not nearly do them justice. The make-up people also deserve the highest praise. All the same, this is definitely a movie that will appeal mainly to the connoisseur and one wonders how any investors in their right minds would advance even a nickel to finance a movie like this, let alone forty million. If they had asked me for my advice, I would have told them they had no chance whatever of making a dime. But thanks a lot fellas! I really enjoyed this really bizarre movie anyway, and it didn't cost me so much as a cent!
  • A movie you can watch when you want lots of interesting characters, scenery, and complete nonsense everywhere you look. This movie was never intended to be an intellectual masterpiece...it was made to make people laugh, and to entertain. On many levels its very similar to movies like Scary movie, and the burbs...which have decent ratings. I just don't understand the average person these days, and what they seem to like about anything. Movies like traffic get 10's, and movies like this get 3.5's...traffic was a total bore fest, and this movie kept me entertained. Before everyone starts thinking "this guy is out to lunch" Keep in mind that one of my favorite movies of all time is Brazil..a movie which got amazing reviews, and in my opinion is equally as unsettling.
  • A local morning radio show was asking people to call in and vote for the worst movie they'd ever seen, and although I have only seen this movie once, and it was about 15 years ago, it IMMEDIATELY came to mind and without questions it was my vote. (I bonded with a roommate in college over the fact that both of us thought this movie was the worst ever made.) Not only is the story line corrupted with inaccuracies and absolutely unbelievable paranoia, the scenery is disturbing and amateur. John Candy somehow plays a giant baby (excuse me, TWO giant babies) who play in sort of tire yard? The acting is weak, the writing is inexcusable, and it is 90 minutes of my life that I will unfortunately never get back.
An error has occured. Please try again.