User Reviews (131)

Add a Review

  • Throughout the 80s and 90s, Barbra Streisand has grown in stature (albeit sporadically) as a formidable producer and director of social drama for both films and TV. The apex of her behind-the-camera career came with "The Prince of Tides," a poignant study of a man coping with the long-term effects of childhood trauma. Streisand nurtures this pet project from start to finish (co-adapted by Pat Conroy from his epic novel), finding a precise heartbeat for the profoundly sentient piece. Despite a rather protracted love story and one too many climaxes, Streisand, who also co-stars, never loses sight of the novel's primary intent.

    Streisand graciously hands the spotlight over to actor Nick Nolte, who gives the most sensitive, emotionally complex performance of his varied career. Tom Wingo is a walking shell of a man who quells his pain with a drink, an easy smile, a cleverly foul remark, and a bitter, uncontrollable outpouring of anger. A one-time Southern-bred football coach-turned-teacher, he has grown increasingly irresponsible and disconnected over the years. With a troubled marriage hovering over him, he conveniently heads off to New York City at the urging of sister Savannah's psychiatrist, Susan Lowenstein, following his twin's most recent wrist-slashing attempt. His purpose is to fill in the missing details of her tormented past (she has blotted out all childhood memories) in order to help steer the psychiatrist in her recovery process. Eventually, Tom, who lacks faith in psychiatry, finds himself facing his own demons as these initial discussions about Savannah take a suddenly dramatic and romantic turn.

    In addition to Nolte's Oscar-nominated showcase, much of the film's strength lies in the highly concentrated flashback sequences as Tom recalls his turbulent family life. Kate Nelligan (also Oscar-nominated) is simply extraordinary as Lila, Tom's brittle, often callous mother, who quite understandably vows to remarry into money after surviving a horrific first marriage to Tom's violent, alcoholic, dirt-poor father (played by an absolutely terrifying Brad Sullivan). Nelligan grabs this role literally by the throat and allows her character no apologies for her flawed, self-serving logic, despite the effects it would have on her children, as her wealthy second husband starts exhibiting the same abusive traits as the first. Kudos must also go to the three strong young actors who play the Wingo siblings as children for reenacting the more horrific elements of this story.

    Some of the other present-day roles, however, are hit-and-miss in their effectiveness. Blythe Danner has some strained though affecting moments as Tom's neglected wife. Sadly, the vital role of Savannah is nearly excised from the film. What with the talented Melinda Dillon egregiously reduced to such an insignificant extra, one can only rue the dramatic potential untapped here. As Savannah's neighbor and trusted friend, George Carlin seems to be around merely to show off New York gay chic -- providing mild amusement, a bit of pathos, and little else. On a brighter note, Jason Gould (Barbra's real-life son) acquits himself surprisingly well in the difficult role of Lowenstein's antagonistic son who slowly bonds with Tom's absentee father figure -- showing for once that nepotism isn't necessarily blind or reckless. Dutch actor Jeroen Krabbé gets brief but noticeable exposure as Herbert Woodruff, Lowenstein's charming, smug-elegant husband, a renown concert violinist who demonstrates more affection for his Stradivarius than either his wife or child. There is one telling dinner scene at his opulent Manhattan high-rise in which the out-classed Wingo gets to put Woodruff in his place.

    As for Streisand herself, many will invariably take her to task for casting herself in the fundamental role of Susan Lowenstein. A star of such magnitude always faces the daunting task of presenting a fully- realized character, and Streisand is only marginally successful here. Although there is undeniable sexual chemistry between her and Nolte, it's hard to overlook her somewhat glossy approach to the role and the unethical intentions of her character. One can only imagine the ramifications of such a harmful act had her suicidal patient ever uncovered the illicit affair between her brother and psychiatrist.

    Director Streisand, however, must be applauded for her explicit attention to exterior details. A visually resplendent picture, great care was taken to get the right look and feel. Notice particularly the lovely allegorical scenes with the children at the beginning and end. And with Streisand's exceptional musicianship, it is hardly surprising that James Newton Howard's lush score is one of the most beautifully designed ever (in fact, I borrowed it for my own commitment ceremony in 1996). It floods the film with an unexpressible tenderness. Nick Nolte's bookend narration is perfect as well -- warm, wise, poetic and reflective.

    And so, despite the flaws "The Prince of Tides" may have, Streisand certainly shows that her heart was in the right place.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Part I of My Critique -

    I've read some of the comments here, but unfortunately, have never read the book. Firstly, it's easy to detect the Streisand haters among these "critics"....your hatred is truly sophomoric, and doesn't serve in your recounting an objective critique of the film.

    As for this film itself, I think that Nick Nolte was absolutely the best element in it, as well as Kate Nelligan. I had never been a Nick Nolte fan, and was very surprised by his layered characterization. He did more with just a certain look, no words, than most actors can hope to accomplish reciting non-stop for two hours straight. In the simple shot of his looking at his daughter blow out her birthday candles and smiling when she's done, right after we are treated with a flashback of his horrid past, was enough to make me break. You could see him hiding some long-held, buried pain behind his genuine smile and love for his daughter. It was, for me, a very subtle, yet powerfully moving moment.

    I think Streisand did a fine job directing this film, and was definitely robbed of a best director nomination. Several of the academy members who presented Oscars that evening, including Billy Crystal, Liza Minnelli, Shirley MacLaine, and Jessica Tandy (who REALLY made a point in a beautifully sarcastic delivery to mention how ridiculous it was that the film was nominated, but not the director. This almost NEVER happens, and it certainly happened that evening because there are so many academy members who despise Streisand.) Minnelli and MacLaine made a point of saying, before they read nominations for the particular award they were giving, that they would love to be directed by Streisand some day....more digs at the Academy. ANYWAY, beyond the snub, I thought the film overall was very poignant.

    Where it falls short, however, are in the following areas. First, Streisand and/or the screenwriter (LaGraveness) shouldn't have focused really any time developing a love story between Streisand and Nolte. This was completely unnecessary. For this reason alone, I might not have even voted the film as one of the best of the year....I don't remember what else came out that year. My contention is that, if you're going to honor a film with the Oscar, you should also honor the director, since this film had Streisand's vision all over it. In fact, LaGraveness I believe was also a bit disgruntled with the many rewrites that Streisand made of his screenplay. More time should have been devoted to the horrific background story of Nolte's family, and of his sister. I understand that her character was actually schizophrenic for many years, probably triggered by her rape at 13, but that was not portrayed at all in the movie. Also, I thought Jason Gould did a fine job in his little part. However, I think it was disingenuous to even include that whole storyline in the movie. He was introduced in a slice of voice-over offered by Streisand's character when she talks to Nolte during a transitional scene when she invites Nick Nolte inside her apartment after he walks her home from Eddie's (George Carlin) party. She asks "why don't you come inside. I'd like you to meet my son." I know the plausibility we're supposed to accept is that, her son is a bit difficult and he's in football, and Nolte's character is a football coach who might be able to coach him privately....but I just didn't buy this whole plot line. It was an opportunity for Streisand to give her son a part in her film...that's it. He did all right in the part....I just didn't think this element was necessary. More showcasing for Streisand.

    What else....the love story. I know that Tom Wingo (Nolte) is not her patient, so, romance between a doctor and his/her patient isn't an issue. And, it is plausible that she is pained as well, since her husband is having an affair, we later learn, with another woman. However, it would have been far more realistic and plausible if no romance came up, and no opening up on Streisand's part occurred at all. Or perhaps we might have been offered only a glimpse of her also troubled life, even though it's shielded behind the veneer of her being a successful psychiatrist. But to have her character let loose in a full-blown romance with Nolte's character was a plot line that took so much time away from what I really wanted to see, which was more of the background of the Wingo family, and particularly more of the sister herself....the raison d'etre of the film itself.

    Part I Ends. See Part II for the rest of my critique.
  • Maimo18 January 1999
    I personally really like Barbra Streisand, and I think that this is a very good movie, even if not particularly for her own presence. The story is touchy and involving. The screenplay is well written and never exaggerated or out of track. Even the final cliché of the two main characters falling in love with each other is pretty well portrayed. Probably because it doesn't just happen during the final-five-minute-scene, but is developed enough to make it believable and not ridiculous. The soundtrack, by James Newton Howard, is lovely and really fulfills and underlines the whole movie. Technically, the finest work is done by the cinematography, which is warm and wrapping. The entire cast is good, especially Nick Nolte, who is very believable and delivers a great performance. Barbra Streisand is great behind the camera but only good in front of it. Playing the role of a rich, sophisticated, and independent woman she is kind of playing herself. Indeed, she is at her best when she doesn't have to deliver any line. Unarguably, because her charming presence by itself is enough to fill up the entire screen. She was probably too busy worrying about the way she looked than anything else. This probably wouldn't have happened if someone else were directing her. But then again, in that case we probably wouldn't have enjoyed her sweet and profound point of view.
  • The Prince of Tides is an exceptional movie! It is filled with emotion, humor, adventure, and pathos. Nick Nolte is the heart of the film. He is a broken man, covering up for the past, trying to please his family, but unable to open up and absolve himself of the dysfunction of his past life. He travels to New York to try to help his sister by uncovering what he has been hiding, with the help of a psychiatrist (Barbra Streisand). He is enchanted with her, and is therefore able to open up and reveal the secrets deep within his heart. The emotions that Nick is able to impart to his audience is a joy to see. I learn more about him every time I view this movie. He is a versatile actor and is truly underrated. He DEFINITELY deserved the Oscar for best actor for this difficult role. Barbra Streisand was fantastic as the psychiatrist who had her own secrets, and her son Jason was terrific as the rebellious son who wanted to please his father, but who needed to find himself by taking on the challenge of playing football. I never tire of this movie, and each time I view it, I get more out of it. The "Prince of Tides" has everything I want in a movie, and if I were to rate it, I would give it 4 stars.
  • Middling adaptation of Pat Conroy's bestseller by Conroy and Becky Johnston is ostensibly about a suicidal poetess in New York City (by way of South Carolina) whose psychiatrist contacts her twin brother to order to aid in his sibling's recovery process after she's tried yet again to end her life. However, this troubled writer (played by Melinda Dillon) is stuck away in a hospital bed for much of the movie, leaving the emphasis to fall on Nick Nolte's conflicted family man and director-star Barbra Streisand's well-groomed Dr. Susan Lowenstein, both of whom are in shaky marriages. Their slow-blooming love affair is the part of the story that has obviously attracted Streisand. Yes, she's focused and intense as a filmmaker when covering the youngsters' volatile childhood (including a secret from the past that must be dredged up in order to heal old wounds); but, between Nolte and Streisand swooning over each other, Nolte fighting with his domineering mother (Kate Nelligan, who has remarried into prominence) and his estranged wife (Blythe Danner)--plus Streisand dealing with her own louse of a husband (expert-rotter Jeroen Krabbé)--the film becomes a sea of soapy clichés. Streisand gets a good rhythm going in the scenes between Nolte and Jason Gould (Barbra's real-life son playing her screen son), but she seems to have no inspiration when depicting simple scenes of chit-chat (a lunchbreak moment wherein she and Nolte buy chili from a street vendor is so phony, we can't even be sure either of them has taken a bite). As to the romance, Streisand pours on the candlelight, pretty music, and a flirty football montage. The suicidal sister is "improving", we're told, as the film fades-out, leaving us only with the doctor's heartbreak and the brother's newfound resilience. It's a false front. Seven Oscar nominations, including Best Picture. Streisand received a DGA nomination for her direction but was overlooked by the Academy. Conroy and Johnston received a WGA nomination for their adapted screenplay. **1/2 from ****
  • khatcher-214 February 2004
    Having long ago first been hit by such things as `Hello, Dolly' and `Funny Girl', in the intervening years I seemed to fall into not caring what Ms. Barbra Streisand was doing or undoing. Such that, on first seeing this film some years ago, and now again a few days ago, it is indeed a nice surprise to see that she can do things behind the camera with aplomb, with a little help from her friends, and more or less acceptable things before the camera, with a lot of help from Nick Nolte. Almost certainly the best film I have seen him in - or, at least, of the kind that I consider stomacheable. His playing is just right, and helped out by some really good camera-work, the film is pleasantly comfortable viewing with a story-line carried out with much gallantry.

    Perhaps overly long; I feel sure that a few nicely placed cuts would not have been out of place.

    Worth seeing with a plate of peanuts, a little red wine, and relax and let the story carry you. Worthwhile viewing which does not require too much cerebral activity, but without falling into the triviality of more recent romanticisms.
  • I avoided this movie because I did not care to see a romance involving Barbra Streisand and Nick Nolte. When we finally rented the movie, it turned out to be so, so much more. An incredibly intense film. I was never of fan of Nolte, but what a tremendous performance! It moves me to tears every time I watch this film. I am amazed the IMD reviewers give it such a low rating.
  • This is a great book by Pat Conroy. Typically semi auto biographical and set in the Carolina low country. Having read the book first...as everyone should in any case, I expected the movie to be a little different than the book. I don't have an issue with the story, but the casting just never fit for me. All of the actors are significant in their own right, however I just think they were miscast with the possible exception of Streisand (whose acting is suspect for me in any case). I love Blythe Danner, however, she would have been more suited to Lila, and Kate Nelligan more suited to Sally (although I never would have cast her in that part). I just couldn't buy Nick Nolte as Tom...It just never felt right, so it's a little painful to watch given how much I loved the book.
  • I have seen this movie many times and it always holds me. Its rhythm, cinematography and casting is perfect and the story never fails to deliver.

    Tom Wingo, played by Nolte in an all-time best for him, has to go to New York to help his twin sister, Savannah Wingo, played by Melinda Dillon who has attempted suicide for the umpteenth time. Tom is aware there are ghosts in the family but wants to keep them submerged. However with the love for his sister and the encouragement of her psychiatrist, Lowenstein, played by Streisand, the truth begins to unfold along with a love between Lowenstein and Tom who are both in unhappy marriages.

    There are no easy solutions here to the many issues that are raised, suffice is to say that Streisand, who also directs, keeps a gentle hand in and does not wham home any major emotional points. George Carlin is deft in a minor role, as is Blythe Danner as Tom's wife. The film never fails to pack a punch for me.

    9 out of 10. Kudos to all, not a false note.
  • As so often happens, Hollywood ruined a ten-star book. If I hadn't read the book 1st, I might have given it a 7. To those who liked the movie, I urge you to read the book!
  • It is next to impossible to turn a 800 page novel into a consumable movie without losing some of what made the novel brilliant in the first place (which this one is). The novel is about growing up in South Carolina and about the love of three siblings for each other. The novel takes its name from what the sister calls one of the brothers: The Prince Of Tides. But, Luke Wingo, the title character is seldom seen in this mediocre adaptation. Ms. Streisand decided to make it a love story about her character and Lukes brother Tom. She missed the entire point, and screwed up a good story that would have better been left as a mini-series because of its length and depth. (She needs to watch LONESOME DOVE or ROOTS or CENNTENIAL to see that you can make masterpeices on tv, especially if you have a huge text to work from).

    However, Nolte is perfectly cast, and plays the part of a downtrodden southern everyman very well. The few childhood flashback scenes that they do film are done very well. Too bad Babs didn't realize this was the meat of the novel. Oh well, at least she didn't sing.
  • olddiscs11 January 2002
    Streisand directed Prince Of Tides in'91, and was not honored by the Oscars with a nomination for Best Director;. fortunately the Directors Guild and Golden Globes did not ignore her, and the film. Beautifully directed, acted, scored and phtographed, it deserved all the praise it has received. Some fans of the book were disappointed because so much was deleted.. true, maybe should have been or will someday be a mini series... but Streisand and Conroy, caught the heart of the book, the dysfunctional family.. and the problems that emerged in future generations; Nolte was excellent as was Kate Nelligan... see it again and again, Brava Babs !!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    For me, the pleasure of watching this film again, now in 2012, is remembering just how fine an actor Nick Nolte was before he (well, I'll put it politely) "let himself go" (although my favorite performance of his was "Jefferson In Paris". But, this is a close second.

    Here, Nolte plays a teacher/football coach from the South Carolina coast, who is asked by his mother to go to New York City to help his sister, who has again attempted suicide. There, he works with his sister's psychiatrist -- Barbra Streisand -- to try to determine was leads the sister to her attempts at self-destruction. In sessions, Streisand plumbs the dysfunctional family in which Nolte and his sister grew up. A moderate number of flashbacks are used, some somewhat disturbing, and an abusive father and a weird mother. Meanwhile, Nolte's own marriage is dissolving. And, just to make it real fun, Nolte and Streisand develop feelings for each other. Finally, Nick reveals to Streisand that as a teen, 3 escaped convicts raped him and mother and his sister, and that his older brother shot 2 of the convicts, while his mother stabbed the other. The shock of the film is...well, best to let you discover that. Will Nick stay with Barbra? Will the sister recover? It's an excellent story by Pat Conroy, and it's difficult not to draw parallels with the kinds of work that Lillian Hellman once wrote.

    As I indicated earlier, Nick Nolte is superb...perhaps his finest performance. I was not as impressed with Barbra Streisand's acting here. Not that it was bad. It was fine. But I didn't quite buy into her as a psychiatrist, though I thought her scenes at the dinner party segment and her romantic scenes were excellent. And, I say that as someone who generally enjoyed her in film portrayals, and I actually feel she should have made far more motion pictures. But, I give her immense credit here for here work as producer and director and the film.

    Though not a large part, George Carlin is very good playing a "quite" gay friend of the sister's. All the actors do a nice job here, and it is worth noting that Barbra's son in the film really is Barbra's son.

    This is an excellent film with a sensitive performance by a once great actor -- Nick Nolte.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I recently read the book, Prince of Tides, and it was wonderful, so I decided to give the movie a shot. I was extremely disappointed. The main character, Tom Wingo, is supposed to be an intelligent but troubled man, burdened with his past and hides his emotion through humor and sarcasm. Nick Nolte instead came off as having swallowed a bottle of Adderall, then trying, and failing, to do a comedy routine. I was also unmoved by his "emotional" scenes. And Barbara Streisand as the unhappy psychiatrist who doesn't realize her own beauty and inadvertently seduces Tom while trying to coax out his emotions? No offense to Babs, she is an excellent actress, but not meant for this role. Furthermore, while I understand the movie couldn't possibly portray every part of the book, the parts it did choose were random and failed to capture the true story. For instance, there was an entire story behind the rape scene that wasn't explained, nor was the part where Lila takes young Tom to the rich guy's house to apologize. Savannah Wingo, the character who half the story is supposed to about, wasn't developed nearly enough. Pat Conroy is a beyond excellent writer whose works could never be fully captured by a movie, but this movie didn't even seem to try. I'd stick to the book.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Pat Conroy adapts a novel about a dysfunctional SC Southern family's traumatic events, with Barbra Streisand, into an Oscar-nominated intense role for Nick Nolte, who plays the leading man (Tom Wingo), to Streisand's (Susan Lowenstien) leading woman, NYC psychiatrist. The beginning twist is, Lowenstien is Wingo's sister's shrink who Wingo finds accidentally after his sister's suicide attempt. Wingo is not Lowenstien's client.

    Wingo agrees to help Lowenstien by giving her family background information to help his mentally suffering sister. It becomes harder to recall that he's not her client when his post-traumatizing repressed memories are brought forth by Lowenstien in such ways that they expose his own mid-life crises & Lownestien's. Healing each other through their therapeutic talks, Lowenstien & Wingo begin to become romantically involved. They go so deep with each other mind to mind that it seems only natural that they express themselves to each other in physically tender ways, as well.

    Though the film's climax involves memories of childhood post-traumatic sexual violence & their romance is bittersweet, Streisand, once again, directs another stellar film. She treats a very difficult theme, that is cinematically understudied as carefully (or perhaps carelessly over-studied), with the utmost tenderness as both a psychiatrist in role & a director. This time, her real son plays her real son (and a violin). Yes, for this movie, one does break out the violin.
  • mack-3811 December 2000
    I guess what drew me to this movie was Nick Nolte narration at the very beginning and end. This is indeed a very touching, sad and all too often true story of life as we struggle to overcome our obstacles, past injustices that many of us face through out life.

    I highly recommend this movie, but better seen without commercial interruption.
  • Kinda awesome. Kinda mushy. Streisand directs and stars in a movie where she helps mend Nolte, who comes from a tragically broken home in the south.
  • Barbra Streisand's visual presentation of Pat Conroy's novel is excellent! I never expected a film under her direction to be this great and very expressive. Nick Nolte's acting is excellent and I can't think of any actor who can play his role as Tom. For those of you who never seen this film, The Prince of Tides is a drama that tackles family, time and emotions. The film is indeed a great imitation of life!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Directed by the lead star herself, earning a Golden Globe nomination for it, Barbra Streisand deftly translates a novel to the screen. Basically Tom Wingo (Golden Globe winning, and Oscar nominated Nick Nolte) isn't happy with life, having misunderstanding wife Sally (Blythe Danner), suicidal sister Savannah (Melinda Dillon), and dominant mother Lila Wingo Newbury (Oscar nominated Kate Nelligan) to deal with. Originally meant more on Savannah's behalf, Tom opens up to her psychiatrist Dr. Susan Lowenstein (Streisand) about all his problems, and to uncover the terrible secrets of the past. Slowly it becomes clear that Tom not only is opening up to Susan, but they both fall in love with each other, I can't really remember why in the end they part, well, they do have partners. Also starring The Living Daylights' Jeroen Krabbé as Herbert Woodruff, George Carlin as Eddie Detreville, Jason Gould as Bernard Woodruff and Brad Sullivan as Henry Wingo. Nolte is quite something as he wrestles with family demons, and Streisand as both actress and director does a very good job, and even though I missed half an hour of the beginning, I caught up very quickly, and there were some good moments to enjoy. It was nominated the Oscars for Best Art Direction-Set Decoration, Best Cinematography, Best Music for James Newton Howard, Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material from Another Medium and Best Picture, and it was nominated for Best Motion Picture - Drama. Very good!
  • This is a poignant movie done with the usual excellence that Barbra Streisand is known for, both in subject matter and acting ability. Nick Nolte manages to convey both the recipient and the facilitator of the healing process with depth and believability. Their chemistry is challenging and enjoyable to watch. Some of the scenes that depict early memories may be dangerous trigger points for people who are still in the healing process, but they are handled with care and a gentle touch. This movie will help you believe that healing can become a reality in your life, if only you are willing to do the work. It helps those that are in pain reach for that place where peace exists. I would recommend this movie to anyone that is in the healing process, as well as to anyone who simply enjoys a well-constructed drama with plenty of humor thrown in for good measure. This movie will make you think, and it will help you heal. An excellent movie - one that I now own in my movie library. See this movie!
  • Any Barbara Streisand film I've seen made any film by George Romero look like any film from Chuck Jones. But, I actually liked this film. The acting was surprisingly good (not by Streisand, but by Nick Nolte as the man with troubles) and there were good dramatic scenes. Not a bad Streisand film (which is saying something big). Biggest incentive (for me), George Carlin appears as Nolte's Gay neighbor and gives one of his best (in a few) performances. A-
  • I'm afraid Streisand's overblown ego defeats this film. Taking what is essentially over-ripe Tennessee William's material, this may have had possibilities. But Streisand's character (and especially the director's fawning to her character (no surprise, since she directed it) makes this an ego journey of immense proportions. I don't know how Nolte survived this and how he crafted such a magnificent performance. I don't know how he managed to mutter the film's last lines ("Lowenstein, Lowenstein.") without breaking into laughter. (My guess...liquor and multiple takes.) Streisand as a performer needed someone to fetter her (she can give good performances when restrained.) Streisand the director needed to keep from falling in love with Lowenstein. (She did very well with the opening...except the titles and cast lists interfered with the story.) At the end, the only impression left is an unsubtle argument for Streisand's greatness. An argument that fails to persuade.
  • Part of my love may come from the fact that The Prince of Tides is my favorite book. I know the film leaves out details from the book, but if the screenplay had included everything, the movie would have been longer than Gone With the Wind! It is a faithful adaptation of a beautiful book. I think it is Streisand's greatest directing achievement.

    The acting was superb! Streisand played Susan Lowenstein wonderfully, and I haven't seen a better performance from Nick Nolte playing Tom Wingo. Particularly, he plays the haunted Tom with just that hint of "the boy who never got to grow up" while telling the tales of his childhood. Kate Nelligan eerily wavered between loving and destructive mother, Lila. And Blythe Danner was typically wonderful; she stood out in every scene she was in.
  • deickos25 November 2022
    The most interesting scene seems to be when the mother feeds her abusive husband dog food and he likes it better than a gourmet dish. Streisand likes the mother character it seems and like her - having no other option - gives us the dog food we crave for desperately.

    Although the most usual complains are about Streisand - in my opinion it is the story that sucks. The theme of the dysfunctional family is entangled with the rape story from some strangers in the night ("escaped convicts"). The only other story i could think of - being equally ridiculous - was the Warren commission's verdict about JFK: a bum responsible for all that mess.
  • rich-1061 February 1999
    The movie should have focused solely on the psychological make-up of the Nick Nolte character, Tom, or of his mother. Instead we gets tons of the usual New Yorker vs. Southerner dialogue, a silly romance between Nick and Barbra which serves no purpose, a pointless interaction of Tom with Lowenstein's son. The childhood events of Tom and his family were so intense that the secondary plots were fluff. On top of that, the "yelling" school of acting was sometimes employed. When you can't think of any good dialogue, simple have the actor rant and rave loudly way out of proportion to the issue discussed. Exactly what made Tom lose and gain back interest in his loving family was really important but not really explained.
An error has occured. Please try again.