Add a Review

  • robertconnor29 January 2007
    And so the fabulous BBC productions of the Miss Marple stories draw to a close... perhaps not the best of Christie's stories, but it still offers many delights as a piece of television, including the reappearance of a host of familiar characters from previous outings. It would appear this was Watford's last screen appearance before her death in 1994, and watching her recreate Dolly Bantry is therefore bittersweet. The timing, intonations and tiny details she brings to the part are delicious (as they were in The Body In The Library), and all her scenes with Hickson are quite wonderful. The story is probably a tad convoluted, yet it really is the small details that make it another triumph - Dolly and friends' reaction to the marble bathrooms; Mrs. Brogan's hilarious 'buttering' (totally authentic); Hickson's disapproval of Miss Knight's fussing. Slightly confusing that Castle's clever depiction of D.I. Craddock has now become another of Jane Marple's nephews (they weren't related in A Murder Is Announced), but it's still a joy to see him return in another cloud of cigarette smoke.

    So, all this and one last brilliant, expertly crafted portrayal of "the Marple woman" by Joan Hickson. Now all we need is for someone to revisit Ms. Hickson's career and issue some of the many films she appeared in on DVD.
  • It may not be the best of the bunch but it's still a good TV movie. A nice touch is the fact that we see several faces that we saw in Murder At The Vicarage an earlier movie of this series. There is Dolly Bantrey ( now a widow), there is the vicar ( he was not the vicar in Murder at the vicarage but seems to have made a promotion) and some more characters. This one is surely better than the movie with Liz Taylor and Angela Lansbury. This was the last one of the series and it's a shame they did not continue it with movies of some of the Miss Marple short stories. Hickson was - up till now - the best Miss Marple. Let's hope they 'll find another person just as good and still use the short stories!
  • Arthur Bantry has passed away, Dolly Bantry has sold Gossington Hall to legendary film icon Marina Gregg, and moved to a small lodge on the site. Marina has moved to St Mary Mead for a quieter life, along with husband Jason Rudd and servants. Marina agrees for Gossington Hall to host its annual fête, she is introduced to the locals, one she meets in particular seems to have a profound effect on her, Heather Badcock, a woman of modest means from the new development site and St John's Ambulance volunteer. During the rather dull conversation about a meeting many years previous, Marina is frozen to the spot, a look described as being likened to The Lady of Shalott 'Doom came upon her etc.' Heather, not a drinker, takes a drink (a daiquiri) intended for Marina, not used to alcohol suddenly dies, alarm bells raised and Marina descends into a terrified state, who had intended to poison her?

    Miss Marple, now in advanced years has a carer/companion Miss Knight, a feisty Scots woman who attempts to encourage Miss Marple to take it easy, but the Detective in her sets out to unravel the mystery.

    As a novel I think it's one of the easiest Agatha Christie stories to read, the characters are beautifully created, they translate well into this adaptation. Claire Bloom is particularly delightful as Marina Gregg, I firmly believe in her being a great actress in her later years (well it's not exactly a stretch in reality is it?) such a beautiful, charismatic woman.

    Lots of old friends on show to bow out with, Inspector's Craddock and Slack, Dolly Bantry, Sergeant Lake, Christopher Hawes etc, it ends with such a sweet moment.

    Favourite scene has to be the village ladies discovering the Marble bathrooms for the first time, no doubt rare at the time, their reactions are just wonderful. Miss Marple's frustrations with Miss Knight are so fun too

    Such a shame they never adapted The Blue Geranium, I love the audio-book ready by Joan Hikson.

    People have commented about Miss Marple suddenly being Craddock's aunt, I think it's meant more as a term of endearment, a closeness developed over the years.

    9/10, a tale of tragedy as well as a murder, with subtle elements of humour woven in. I like it very very much. It's ultimately superior to the Hollywood film.
  • I think on seeing the 1981 Hollywood version and the 1992 version I do feel that being 'British myself that it is much better to keep to the authors way of telling the story as this is Agatha Christies way and that is why she is so popular. As for Joan Hickson playing the part of miss Marple I feel she is perfect and that Agatha Christie was right in her choice and of course she must be right. As to the plots they are meant to be intriguing and complicated not to be made easy to work out .
  • So, here we are with the redoubtable Miss Marple, a lovely Claire Bloom and a fine cast. Some of the neighborhood regulars are back, like Ms. Bantry, the maids, Inspectors Slack and Craddock. It is fun to be at Gossington Hall again, albeit under new owners. Of course, that's key to the storyline and adds to the interest. I liked Ms. Bantry before and again in this. The relationship between her and Ms. Marple is interesting. Somehow, their talks offer up a spark that leads to a rewarding line of inquiry. Inspector Slack is always an entertaining character, in attitude expressing looks, droll remarks and the die hard approach he always takes, many times in error.

    One review here mentions a part of the book that greatly impressed me as well. It was a description of Heather Badcock. In the allusion to her village parallel, Alison Wilde, she says, "… She didn't know what people were like. She'd never thought about them. And so, you see, she couldn't guard against things happening to her. It comes really from being self-centered and I don't mean selfish by that. You can be kind and unselfish and even thoughtful. But … you never really know what you may be doing … most people have a sense of protection. They realize when it's unwise to say or do something because of the person or persons who are taking in what you say, and because of the kind of character that those people have. But as I say, AW never thought of anybody else but herself. She was the sort of person who tells you what they've done and what they've seen and what they've felt and what they've heard. They never mention what any other people said, or did. Life is a kind of one-way track, just their own progress through it. Other people seem to them just like – like wallpaper in a room. I think HB was that kind of person."

    And of Ms. Badcock particularly, "… she wasn't a considerate woman. Kind, yes. Considerate – no. She would be fond of him (her husband) and look after him when he was ill and see to his meals and be a good housekeeper, but I don't think she would ever – well, that she would ever even know what he might be feeling or thinking. That makes a lonely life for a man."

    However, Ms. Marple did speak most of this in this adaptation, which was revealing of the woman's vulnerability to danger.

    Some say this is a weaker entry in the BBC Marple lineup, but I don't see it like that. The 1980 version with Taylor/Hudson et al. and Lansbury as Ms. Marple strayed more from the book - well, it's the Hollywood treatment. Some compare this BBC version to that since it came along later, but shouldn't. The BBC series is entirely truer. They did it right. The village and settings are always wonderful. I enjoy it thoroughly, one for the collection to see regularly. This gets a "well done" from me.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Hickson's Miss Marple has always struck me as very authentic, and this adaptation captures the tone and feel of the book very well, cutting-out some of the complexities (Marina Gregg's first husband, events concerning the butler) that burdened the book with unhelpful and implausible complexities.

    But one key observation in the book, about the flaw in Heather Badcock's nature that led to her death, made this book my favorite Christie, and it ought not to have been cut.

    In Miss Marple's first meeting with her, Badcock's conversation causes Miss Marple to recognize a similarity between Badcock and an old acquaintance of Miss Marple, Alison Wilde. At the end of the book, Miss Marple explains (SPOILER coming):

    'Quite so,' said Miss Marple, '(Marina Gregg) never knew (who gave her the German Measles that crippled her baby) until one afternoon here when a perfectly strange woman came up those stairs and told her the fact - told her, what was more - with a great deal of pleasure! With an air of being proud of what she'd done! She thought she'd been resourceful and brave and shown a lot of spirit in getting up from her bed, covering her face with make-up, and going along to meet the actress on whom she had such a crush and obtaining her autograph. It's a thing she has boasted of all through her life. Heather Badcock meant no harm. She never did mean harm but there is no doubt that people like Heather Badcock (and like my old friend Alison Wilde), are capable of doing a lot of harm because they lack not kindness, they have kindness - but any real consideration for the way their actions may affect other people. She thought always of what an action meant to her, never sparing a thought to what it might mean to somebody else.'

    The whole book thus is driven not by greed for money, or lust, or fear of exposure, or blackmail -- the typical drivers of murder mysteries -- but by the devastating effects of self- centered thoughtlessness by a person who never meant anyone any harm. It is a book with a moral message: that it is incumbent on all of us not merely to be free of any overt desire to do harm to another person, but to take thought as to how our plans and proposed actions may nevertheless hurt others.

    This aspect of The Mirror Cracked raises it above all the other Christie novels that I've read (and I've by no means read all that many) by giving it a subtlety that others do not have. It is a shame that Miss Marple does not say in this adaptation the lines she says in the book that make this theme clear.

    As a mystery, the adaptation has a fundamental flaw: in reality, the police would have focused on Marina Gregg's drink, from the moment she gave it to Heather all the way back to the waitress's tray and to the bar before that, examining in detail everyone who was near it, and the police would almost certainly have ascertained within an hour or two after the party that only Marina could have poisoned it. Who could have not only gotten access to the drug, but known it was poisonous, and gotten it into Marina's own glass? Members of the household might know about the drug and might have gotten a dose in advance, but when might they get access to the glass during the party and yet escape detection? Outsiders would not know about the drug. Moreover, the police would certainly have questioned the waitress and cleared-up the bit about who jogged Badcock's arm.

    This adaptation thus depends entirely on the trick of making us not notice the fact that the police have failed to do what any police department would have done immediately. What makes Christie's technique particularly clever is that she gives us a police detective (Craddock) who is so calm, thoughtful, and intelligent, and yet burdened with a nasty fault-finding boss who surely will spot any incompetence by Craddock, we naturally assume that the police, as we see them in the story, are doing as competent a job as any police force could do -- when in fact the police (Craddock especially) are quite incompetent. And the last touch, by the casting director, is to cast an actor whom most women viewers will find especially attractive, so that they are even more inclined to want to believe that he is doing everything that a competent police detective would do.
  • This adaptation respects its material, and is overall a solid adaptation of the book. The book, I will admit isn't Christie's best, but what made it so interesting was the victim Heather Badcock, and I felt that the adaptation could have developed her more. The adaptation is also overlong but maintains interest, thanks to the way it was filmed, the pace and the acting. The adaptation is beautifully filmed, and the music is fantastic. It also moves along at a much more reasonable pace than say They Do It With Mirrors (that was good but i had a real problem with the pace). And the acting is very good, as is the case with the Joan Hickson Marple adaptations. Hickson is indeed terrific as Miss Marple, and Claire Bloom, Barry Newman and Norman Rodway are a fine supporting cast. Gwen Watford is the standout in a hilarious performance. The adaptation which further benefits from good plotting is fairly faithful save a couple of questionable liberties, and the Ella Zeilinsky murder was quite a disturbing scene for me I will admit. All in all, solid adaptation and well worth the look. 8/10 Bethany Cox
  • The village is all of a buzz at the news that the Hall has been bought by American film star Marina Greg and her husband Jason Rudd. When Greg throws a garden party of the locals it ends badly whenever a local woman from the St John's suddenly falls ill and dies. The autopsy finds that she has been poisoned and that it most likely came from a drink – a drink intended for Marina Greg. With such a high profile murder on his hands, Superintendent Slack calls for help in the form of DI Craddock, who also happens to be the nephew of one Miss Marple. With her insightful mind and his detective work the future is bright but the ongoing threats against Greg shows that time is not on their side.

    It is ironic that some fans of the BBC's Miss Marple don't rate this film as highly as some others because personally I think this is one of the more enjoyable ones I have seen recently, probably for the same reasons that others don't. It might be the presence of American accents, or the use of the film world as a backdrop or the use of humour within the plot and characters but somehow this film had more life and energy to it than some of the other films. The plot moves along quickly and we have the death within thirty minutes rather than the usual hour; this means we spent little time dawdling before the story starts. After this point it keeps up a good pace and is enjoyable from start to finish. The mystery itself benefits from the pace and avoids the trap of being deadly dull, becoming something that feels a bit lighter and more entertaining – although fans of CSI will still struggle with the rather sedentary pace it still has in common with the rest of the series.

    The addition of comedy to the character of Miss Marple is welcome, as is the way she is a bit edgy and rude at times (well, by comparison anyway). Hickson takes to this well – playing off her housekeeper well and having a frustration that I hadn't seen before. Castle works well as her nephew and leads the investigation well as a sort of sidekick to her. The presence of Bloom and Newman add a bit of class to proceedings and by virtue of being American help to loosen the rather tight corset that this series always wore. I thought Gregory's (Fenn) accent was awful but when I found out he was American I realised that it must just be an all round bad performance rather a problem with accents. Support is roundly good and all do their bit to keep the film moving by never being too stiff or "English".

    Overall this is not the film that will win fans of the MTV mystery series (CSI etc) but it is one of the lively films from the BBC Miss Marple series. The story, characters and tone all work together to produce a rather flowing story that has more interest and pace to it than I have seen in other Marple films and it made it more fun than usual.
  • The plot of "The Mirror Crack'd (From Side To Side)" is not one of Agatha Christie's best in sheer "whodunit" terms, but deep down inside it's one of her most dramatic - a series of tragedies that happen despite the fact that none of the characters involved are what you'd call 100% evil. However, just like the earlier theatrical film based on the same novel, this adaptation runs too long and there are some parts that could have easily been shortened (the garden party, for example). The film lacks excitement, even during the resolution, but it is saved by its cast, which is good all around: Elizabeth Garvie, in particular, has a wonderful, magical moment when she passionately whispers "I LOVE YOU" to a man who cannot hear her. Gwen Watford is also delightful as Miss Marple's closest friend. (**1/2)
  • I can hardly believe that three British people above have referred to the beautiful Claire Bloom as and American actress. One of them credited her being American with having enlivened the proceedings, and one blamed her being American for faults in the production.

    Can it be that British people don't know that she is regarded in the United States as one of the most distinguished English actresses? She made her debut in Charlie Chaplin's LIMELIGHT. And could anyone seeing her as Lady Marchmain in BRIDESHEAD REVISITED imagine that she was anything but English? She also appeared on British television as Joy Davidman in SHADOWLANDS.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This was the last of the BBC Miss Marple adaptations to feature Joan Hickson in the title role. Hickson is still wonderful and her banter with the excellent Margaret Courtney as Miss Knight is some of the best stuff in the film. Courtney played Dolly Bantry in the big budget earlier version of this story (with Elizabeth Taylor, Kim Novak et al) but in this version Gwen Watford makes a very welcome return as Mrs Bantry. Indeed, the locals provide the most enjoyment in this adaptation and its nice to see some more old faces from 'Murder at the Vicarage' turn up.

    The incoming Americans are not so successful. Claire Bloom is really too harsh and hard-bitten as Marina Gregg and Elizabeth Garvie isn't anything like as sympathetic in the role of Ella as Geraldine Chaplin in the earlier film. Far from perfect though the earlier film is, I couldn't help comparing certain roles and finding the later version wanting. David Horovitch rolls out his world weary, cynical Slack once again but it was nice to have John Castle back as Craddock (why was he Miss Marple's nephew this time?).

    On balance, despite the liberties taken with the source material, I think I preferred the earlier big budget version of this story. Hickson and the other locals however are well worth watching.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I strongly recommend you read the review entitled "Fine adaptation but omits the book's key observation." As that review discloses, there is a key piece of information which is missing from this film version vs the book.

    In this version, near the end we are told that Marina Gregg was devastated by the birth of her crippled child. However, the filmmakers omitted the crucial fact that the baby was incapacitated as a result of Marina Gregg contracting German measles from Heather Badcock.

    My sincere thanks to sissoed for filling in that incredibly important missing detail.

    If you go back and watch the story, you may notice the filmmakers cheated the poisoning of Heather Badcock. Although the event was narrated at the end of this episode by Miss Marple, it was never actually shown. Of course, if the audience had witnessed the poisoning as it occurred, then the identity of the murderer would have become obvious.

    I also draw your attention to something else sissoed wrote: "This adaptation thus depends entirely on the trick of making us not notice . . ." As I have shown above, that's an important element which more than one viewer has noticed: e.g., Agatha Christie deliberately misled the readers/viewers. Her story is crucially dependant upon the audience failing to perceive circumstances that are self-evident as they transpire.

    Also, one thing which struck me as odd was the amount of time that elapsed before the police (or anyone else) began to focus on protecting Marina. Gee, were they waiting around hoping for another murder or what?

    This is not the best episode in the series. However, the atmospherics and moments of levity were pleasant to watch. As others have mentioned, the supporting cast was outstanding and it is the camaraderie of the characters which carried this episode across the finish line.

    Sadly, not conveying that key information concerning Heather Badcock's interference with the birth of Marina Gregg's baby to the audience severely undermined the entire story. This episode had the potential of being the very best episode in the entire Miss Marple series, with a deep philosophical message transcending mere human treachery. Alas, the filmmakers dropped the ball.
  • The Rover P4 taxi driven by Inch, is unlikely to have had a 1979 model Motorola car radio, in the 1950s
  • rmax30482310 December 2011
    Warning: Spoilers
    I know I'm missing something because so many reviewers have found this a flawed but admirable adaptation, whereas I found it torpid and not very interesting, outside of some of the performances.

    I couldn't follow the plot or the reasoning behind it until the last few moments, after the suicide, when all was revealed in a cascade of off-hand comments that was too fast for comprehension by slow and deliberate minds.

    Claire Bloom still looks good after a career of more than forty years, although she may no longer be the delectable Lady Anne. (Who is?) And John Castle as Miss Marple's nephew, a police inspector, seems very handsome with his silver hair. His expression is sober and intense except when he appears to smirk. At any rate he's more interesting as a character than Joan Hickson herself, as Miss Marple, who is recklessly intuitive and has little presence except as what used to be called a little old lady before we all came down with a serious case of rubella, I mean political correctness. Rubella. I believe that may have been the name of my fifth-grade English teacher. Yes, it was. Miss Rubella DeGroot. She always hated me for mispronouncing "irrevocable".

    Kidding aside, I was lost in the intricacies of the plot and I'm still lost. I don't know, for instance, what the portrait of the Madonna and child had to do with anything.

    Damn, I miss Hercule Poirot in these mysteries. He was always willing to take the time to explain things slowly and in some detail, repeating them as necessary, as if speaking to a young child. That's what some of us duller bulbs need. Less intricacy and less gossip and more Explanations For Dummies.
  • Hard to pin down the year of this episode from autos. Many anachronistic models spanning more than one decade-more like 2decades. Did not spoil the episode for me as they were great to see and so many super clean, no dust or rain spots. I loved them all. 2018 now so all were vintage today.
  • tedg20 January 2007
    Commenting on film is in the long run a matter of advising on who you can trust and who you might want to avoid.

    I can tell you that one person who to avoid is the adapter of this, Bowen. He's been involved in other Christie adaptions and is so brutal in how he handles the core mechanics of what Christie created, he's so evil in his intent he murders the thing.

    So either you can avoid this, supposing what you want is a good mystery after the fashion that Christie created so wonderfully...

    or you can watch it and try to deduce why Bowen murdered it so, what there was about his intent that made this happen. The mystery at this level is quite fascinating, especially if you look at the other Christie screenplays he's done. Its a metadetective narrative: why did he do it? What's the motive?

    Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The poor village of Saint Mary Mead is invaded by some American actors and actresses for the shooting of a film. The main actress was actually raised in the village before moving to America. It's obvious Miss Marple does not consider cinema actors as very respectable people, though that is no reason to kill them. But apparently it is by far enough to justify their suicide. The story is sordid about the past, but that is nearly nothing when compared with the sordidness of the present they impose onto themselves and one another. Working conditions of actors and actresses are horrific and producers are the worst exploiters that can exist and they deserve our full and complete condescending contempt. Add into that picture a couple of adopted children, rejected afterwards, and then a real child reduced to an incurable fate by German measles during the pregnancy and you have the squalid reality of this case. So it is nearly nice of Jane Marple to overlook the slight detail that the death of that actress was not entirely natural though it looks suicidal, or maybe not entirely suicidal though it looks absolutely natural, or whatever other mixture with artificial added in the lot. In one word good riddance and just hope God is just as understanding as we are not.

    Dr Jacques COULARDEAU
  • In 1992, after 8 remarkable years the final Miss Marple mystery was broadcast starring Joan Hickson. She was a remarkably risky choice considering she was 78 when she was cast, but she went on to become the definitive Miss Marple. When she filmed this final mystery in 1992 she was 86 and showing her age. Sadly so does this adaptation, and the feeling of an end to an era is prevalent throughout it.

    Right from the opening scene when Dolly Bantry (a welcome return for Gwen Watford) returns to St Mary Mead it reveals she is now a widow after Arthur's death. Part of her reason for being there again is to visit old friend Jane Marple, who is now struggling with her movement and has been lumbered with a carer called Miss Knight, who is monstrously overbearing with good intentions and "what is good" for Miss Marple. Played by Margaret Courtenay, it's surprisingly to learn that she actually played Dolly Bantry in the 1980 film version, but she does overbearing well here (whether good or bad, depending on your view). Again Miss Marple's infirmary feels like a decline that seeps through this story, and is further accentuated when it's revealed that Dolly is there to take one last look at her old home Gossington Hall after selling it to American film star Marina Gregg (played by English actress Claire Bloom) upon Arthur's death. In a way it's fitting that we return to Gossington Hall, as this is where it all began with The Body in the Library in 1984, and there are return appearances for Rev Hawes, Mrs Brogan and Miss Hartnell - but sadly not for Mrs Price-Ridley (played so wonderfully by Rosalie Crutchley).

    They are all eager to view the place now that Marina Gregg has refurbished it, and get their chance when she agrees to hold the village fete in the grounds. Again, looking at the Hall now feels sad as it has now been designed as a movie star palace, but just looks cold and unhomely compared to the Bantrys cosy old fashioned home. Not that anybody says so, as they are all agog to see the bathroom (too much drink already, perhaps?). Others are eager to talk to the actress Marina Gregg, including fan Heather Badcock (Judy Cornwell), but during the fete Heather collapses and later dies. The toxicology reports reveal she was poisoned, but who would want to poison harmless Heather Badcock? When it is later revealed that Marina had handed her own drink to her after Heather's glass was spilt, police become convinced that Marina was the intended target after all.

    In steps Det Insp Craddock (John Castle), who immediately has to figure out who would want to kill Marina Gregg. Well, after seeing 20 minutes of her in this, practically anybody! It's hard to warm to Claire Bloom as Marina Gregg or to care that her life is threatened, and it's never a good sign when you compare her to Elizabeth Taylor in the (frankly awful) 1980 version. Taylor really fitted the look of a glamorous film star, but Bloom sadly does not have the presence here. Barry Newman fares much better as Jason Rudd, the seemingly devoted husband to Marina, while other suspects include secretary Ella Zeilinski, who is in love with Marina's husband, her medic Dr Gilchrist, the butler Guiseppe Murano (surely not the butler did it?), Ardwyck Fenn and Lola Brewster, a film producer and rival actress on the new set of the new movie Marina is filming, plus a mysterious woman who Dolly Bantry spots at the fete taking photos and recalling the look of shock on Marina's face. Miss Marple had also spotted the photographer, having seen her a few days before in church praying for forgiveness.

    It all sounds very intriguing, and there are further plot twists of anonymous letters, mysterious phone calls, plus another murder to come. But at nearly two hours it feels remarkably drawn out and slow. It's surprising that the makers cut out a couple of scenes from the book, such as one of the murders, as well as the revelation that Arthur Badcock was Marina's first husband, but maybe the latter would of stretched incredulity, so is cut from this adaptation. And there is one glaring inconsistency in the fact that Inspector Craddock has now become Miss Marple's nephew. It's a clunky error that does not fit well, especially as Craddock had previously appeared in A Murder is Announced and no such mention had been made of it. John Castle is however a welcome presence in the mystery, given the job by a newly promoted Superintendent Slack (David Horowitz), who also gives him his assistant Sgt Lake (Ian Brimble) to help him. Lake is now an established character in the series, and it's nice to see Brimble able to develope his character somewhat, even getting to make inquiries of his own and pull in suspects.

    Very few make a memorable impression among the suspects, except maybe Norman Rodway as the irrascible Dr Gilchrist, but he has too few scenes for my liking. Elizabeth Garvie is notable as the raspy voiced, amorous asthmatic secretary Ella Zeilinski, but her heavy breathing eventually gets her into trouble in more ways than one. As to the others, Glynis Barber has little to do as Lola Brewster, while Constantine Gregory as Fenn and Amanda Elwes as the mysterious photographer Margot Bence give solid performances. More irritating are Christopher Hancock and Rose Keegan as Arthur Badcock and Gladys Dixon, a maid at Gossington Hall during the fete, but this is more down to the makers trying to drag out the plot towards the end as Miss Marple tries to find out crucial information that both have. Both questionings feel like extracting teeth when it would only take a couple of sentences to get to the point and feel like padding, and her session with Gladys the maid is so excruiating that it's the one time you wish that the "curse of the domestic" had fallen upon this mystery. No such luck, however.

    Overall, this is a slow and ponderous mystery padded out to it's limits, but one that at least feels like a whodunnit, unlike A Caribbean Mystery. The characters of American film stars and the film industry grate somewhat and do not really fit with the quiet English village of St Mary Mead - though that is more the book's flaw than any problem with the adaptation. And in a way it's a representation of changing times, as the series itself was coming to an end. From the death of Dolly Bantry's husband to the sale and revamping of Gossington Hall - even Miss Marple's frail counternance - few things are the same from when we were first introduced to the inhabitants of St Mary Mead. Inspector Slack feels as though he has only been included for sentiment's sake as he has little to do, but it's always nice to see some old familiar faces to see the series out. In the end this adaptation has an almost maudlin feel to it. It's sad to see it end, but this adaptation really feels like an end to an era.
  • Last appearance of Joan HICKSON as Miss Marple

    Miss Marple's unfortunate friend Mrs Bantry (Gwen WATFORD), who we already know from "Murder in the Library", is back at the start. In the meantime (this novel was published in 1962) the good Dolly is widowed and has had to sell her country estate to an actress who emigrated from England and has now become a Hollywood star. This Marina Gregg (Claire BLOOM) is now making a film in a London studio as Empress Elisabeth, who is confronted with the tragic events of Mayerling. Marina is from the area, but is now an extremely capricious and world-famous diva. With their caring director husband (Barry NEWMAN), the Neureichs now reside in Dolly's country estate and have a good time. One day, the diva and her husband throw a welcoming party, where a terrible event occurs. Of course Miss Marple (Joan HICKSON) is also present...

    What a treat! With this episode, broadcast for the first time on December 27th, 1992, the great Joan HICKSON (1906-1998) really did it and filmed all of Miss Marple's appearances. A brilliant performance! Especially since the HICKSON was already more than 80 years old! Claire BLOOM (*1931) shines as a returning diva, fluctuating between euphoria and depression, airs and graces and being completely overwhelmed by the everydayities of real life. Her Marina Gregg is of course based on the unforgettable Elizabeth TAYLOR (1932-2011), who was filming CLEOPATRA (1963) in London's PINEWOOD Studios at the time the novel was published (but it was also filmed in CINECITTA in Rome!).

    Claire BLOOM was a big film star herself, had played with Charlie CHAPLIN in LIMELIGHT (1952), had to let Maria SCHELL play her husband in THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOW (1957) and also had the West German film in SCHACHNOVELLE (1960) with Curd JÜRGENS honored. At the time the Miss Marple episode was filmed, BLOOM was entangled in a disastrous marriage with the eccentric writer Philip ROTH ("Portnoy's Complaints"), who unfortunately failed to win the Nobel Prize in Literature.

    Nothing about the resolution of the crime plot can be revealed here. Just this much: The tragic events are inspired by events that happened to the actual Hollywood star Gene TIERNEY (1920-1991). So terrible that your heart stops for a moment!

    The wonderful Joan HICKSON cannot be praised enough. How great that she was able to complete her work! Even after thirty years, it's nostalgically beautiful and definitely worth seeing!
  • An earlier version of this movie "The Mirror Crack'd (1980) ASIN: 6302990149" was made with a lot of glitzy characters. Some of them were quite well such as Rock Hudson (Jason Rudd). Others were distracting as they let their real personalities overwhelm the characters. One of the worst was Angela Lansbury's portrayal of Miss Jane Marple; she was much too cutesy. This film was to Americanize (black and white, judgmental.) and half the characters were combined for brevity.

    Based on a novel, Christie, "Agatha. Mirror Crack'd, the", the film Miss Marple: The Mirror Crack'd from Side to Side (1992) (TV) (UK: series title) stays true to form. Joan Hickson as Miss Marple. Agatha Christie always considered her as the ideal Miss Marple; she shows this through her reserve savvy. Jane takes an interactive interest in the mystery and yet each character as part of the discovery, stands on their own. The ending of the story is as is in life, it is appropriate, not black and white judgmental.
  • I have a problem with Joan Hickson as Miss Marple. Although Agatha Christie always considered her as the ideal Miss Marple (way before she even played the detective) I think she is too slow, too boring, too anything but exciting. The TV movie has nothing to do with the 1981 Angela Lansbury - version, but has everything to do with the book. In the 1981 version, lots of characters had been dropped that were in the book, but in this tv movie, every detail has been respected. But I missed the catty relationship between the two movie stars like in the 1981 film.