User Reviews (43)

Add a Review

  • g-bodyl23 February 2015
    I really wanted to like Being Human, but I couldn't get into the film. I liked the philosophical meaning of the film, but the film was practically a snoozefest. Not much happened other than talk about the meaning of life and courage. I liked how they tried to work this movie over several time periods, but in the end it didn't matter that much. I see the talent in this movie and there were bursts of good moments, but it was a dry film on the whole.

    This film is about one man's journey to capture the spirit of courage over many centuries during different civilizations.

    As for the acting, well all the actors gave the film their best. Robin Williams turned in a serious dramatic performance, and that may have saved the movie from oblivion. I also liked John Turturro's few minutes of his entertaining presence.

    Overall, Being Human is not a great film in any stretch of the imagination. It's not god awful either, but perhaps there is a reason why this film remained obscure, twenty-one years after its release date. I liked the attempt to create some philosophical meanings. But good intentions can only carry a film too far. Despite its good intentions, this film is a bust. It has its moment of fine filmmaking, but it could have had way more! My Grade: D+
  • Now here we have one of those movies that started out with a great but very-nearly-impossible-to-film idea, and then just ran out of budget and steam. Very ambitious and unusual, and Robin Williams' performance is pretty solid, but it just doesn't work. Worth watching if you're looking for something really off the beaten path. If you watch carefully, you can catch a glimpse of Ewan McGregor in his first ever movie role, as one of the crusaders.
  • In one of his serious roles sans beard, Robin Williams stars in this somewhat confusing movie about a man portrayed in five different stories, always trying to find meaning in life...or something. Maybe the movie was trying to make a point about something, but I couldn't really tell. In a way, it almost seems like they made the movie for fun and just stacked the whole thing with a giant cast. Director Bill Forsyth, who had a very clear goal in making "Local Hero", seems somewhat confused himself here.

    I should identify that I didn't hate "Being Human". It's an interesting look at world history. It's just hard to get a grip on the movie. An OK way to pass time, but I wouldn't recommend making it your first choice. Also starring Theresa Russell, Robert Carlyle, John Turturro, Vincent D'Onofrio, Jonathan Hyde, Hector Elizondo, Ewan McGregor (in his debut) and William H. Macy.
  • Unfortunately, many people who have seen and reviewed this movie have not taken the time to see its true meaning. Being Human is not the story of man's development over time, it is the story of one man (Robin Williams) and the stages his life has passed through. I watched this movie in an Advanced Cinematography class, and I hated it. But as I began to see the connections between water and shoes as symbols, I began to appreciate it even more. Perhaps I am giving it away, but to really "get" this movie, just look at the title. Forsyth's movie is about being a human being. Hector (Williams) is simply being human, and having a tough time of it. My advice in watching this movie is to pay careful attention to the last segment. It is the key to understanding Being Human.
  • BEING HUMAN starts with two off screen characters in conversation with each other which does give the movie an unwanted light hearted tone . We`re then introduced to Hector ( Robin Williams ) who is looking after his two children in a period of history that feels like the dark ages . Then a ship sails into view which heralds danger .

    It was at this point that I thought the story was going to revolve around Hector and his children so it`s a shock to the system when later on in the movie the action switches to a shipwreck in the 16th century which again features Williams character . I could forgive this because the shipwreck story is so compelling with dozens of people facing certain death because all their supplies are running out and they`re a very long way from any type of civilisation . My heart was in my mouth wondering how these poor people were going to survive . We will never know how because the action then cuts to modern day America with Hector going through a divorce

    So there you go three stories linked by someone played by Robin Williams that have no real connection with one another and I felt totally disgusted by the middle story featuring the shipwreck that comes to a complete halt without any type of resolution . Talk about feeling cheated . I should also point out that if the subtext of this movie is supposed to reflect what it`s like to be human then surely the characters and situations on screen don`t accurately reflect this . In fact there`s something arrogant about the whole idea behind this movie because every single feature film from the classics like THE GODFATHER , THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION and SCHINDLER`S LIST all the way through to straight to video fare like CROCODILE 2: DEATH SWAMP all deal with aspects of human nature . If you want to know what it`s like to be human watch any film not just this one . I doubt if I`ll be watching it again

    The only interest to be had by watching BEING HUMAN is spotting Ewan McGregor and Robert Carlysle before they became famous and several British actors before they got a role in THE BILL
  • Fables were used in the past to tell stories to children. Here Hector (Robin Williams) and a woman story teller (Theresa Russel) whom we never see but only hear, weave several stories for Hector's children to explain his absence from their lives for several years. Each story attempts to explain figuratively what emotions he went through during the period.

    An attentive viewer is amply rewarded by director Bill Forsyth--if you are a casual viewer you will wonder what is happening and consider the film to be disjointed and hence poor entertainment.

    Non-linear narratives are not Forsyth's invention--such films have adorned French and Hungarian cinema for decades. "Being Human" is above average in that company merely because of fine performances from Williams, the beautiful Anna Galiena (Beatrice) an Italian actress, Hector Elizondo, John Turturro, William Macy, and Ewan McGregor to mention a few.

    While the imaginative storytelling technique was impressive, Forsyth never explains who the lady narrator is. Are we expected to imagine it to be Hector's new love? The gradual jumps in time scales, gives us a socio-historical perspective into Hector's education in life, seen through the eyes of his children. Forsyth is interesting but not the best director using this technique. His film demands attention, both literally and figuratively.

    I understand that the director disowns the film after the studios forced him to truncate the film by 40 minutes. Probably the director's cut is far superior to the present version and is likely to be more satisfying to a discerning viewer.
  • SnoopyStyle4 November 2018
    It's five vignettes of five men played by Robin Williams through the world's history. In the first one, Robin Williams plays a caveman with a family. In the second one, Hector (Robin Williams) is a Roman slave longing to go home to his family. In the third one, he's a Scottish crusader journeying home to his family. In the fourth one, he's a Portuguese man shipwrecked with others on the African coast. In the final one, he's in modern New York City. After serving time for white collar crime, he is pulled into another shady deal by his former prison mate and business partner. He takes his estranged kids on a weekend at a beach house.

    Man is weak. Life is difficult. Time is long. Then you die. Repeat. It's a tiring journey into this soul's repetitive progression. While his final connection to his kids is able to bring him to resolution, it is a grinding, boring trip. Filmmaker Bill Forsyth needs a more defined journey. For example, maybe have Hector go through the same story era after era and show him change his actions each time. It could be Groundhog's Day in a sense. There is a lifelessness in Hector and a lifelessness in the storytelling. It's very flat.
  • Being Human is probably Bill Forsyth's "worst" film. And it got some of the LOUSIEST reviews ever when released. But Bill Forsyth's worst is still better than most people's best, and there was some positive reappraisal of it when the video came out. I think it's worth seeing, especially if you don't compare it to Forsyth's great films (Local Hero, Housekeeping, Gregory's Girl). Robin Williams is fine, as usual, as our anti-hero through time, and if the plot and running jokes wear more than a little thin by the end, the journey is still interesting.
  • radseresht2 May 2006
    Well, lets see. aha ha, right, Being Human. Well lets start with saying that this was the most outrageously boring film in the entire world. I would rather eat popcorn staring at the wall at home. Robin Williams is my favorite actor, but this is my least favorite movie. It started so peaceful, the trailer was nice, the cover was interesting, but the movie was like walking through thick goo, it takes you ages to get through, and you are not comfortable. Now what a movie ay? If you want a story, read a book. There was not much music, practically no good effects or camera moves. Costumes were alright, the dialogue was good but tedious, and plus, no real excitement through the whole thing. Lets just say, it is a bit different hmm? The story is meaningfu but i would understand it more on a book. While you watch it, you don't concentrate on the movie but the things around you. You start counting your teeth, or the tiles on the floor. You bite your nails and do whatever you do when bored (e.g. eat). It is truly a movie for your home with a hot meal and while its raining. But, watch it anyway, it may be appealing to you, but no matter what happens, prepare for a sleepy adventure!!!!!
  • The life you live will be the same over and over again. You will repeat your lessons again and again in various forms until you have learned them. After learning it, there's evolution and wisdom. This is what can be said about this film except that it presents its stories without having this sort of spiritual value. It brings this idea of the eternal returning throughout this main character but it is developed almost like a fairy tale taken out of a children's book.

    Travelling through different countries and periods of time, going from the Celts cavemen to the modern New York businessman, "Being Human" has Robin Williams playing a character named Hector and his appearances in distinct centuries trying to learn what means to be a human being. In the five short stories created here, Hector, living as a Celtic in the highlands, had his wife and children taken away by barbarians; was the slave of a dumb master (John Turturro) in a more civilized era; a married man who fell in love with a foreign woman, a few centuries later; a military during the Portugual's Maritime Expansion on Africa, conquering new lands and new treasures; and as a troubled divorced man trying to reconciliate with his children of whom he hasn't seen since the end of his marriage. The movie fails in being real or accurate enough in all of the stories except in the last one which is very close to us.

    Slow, of mannered delivery and hardly getting better as the stories unfold, "Being Human" is the kind of film that really follows its lessons, it'll only grow on you after countless views. In my case four attempts, of these in two I fell asleep (but always believing that there was something interesting there), one in which I watched the whole thing and didn't like and the last one in which my perception changed and end up being a good film, far from being a masterpiece that it could be. So, you'll have to watch this film over and over until you get something from it, then you can evolve into really saying if this is a good or a bad film.

    This whole idea of a man trapped in strange and quite horrendous situations where every kind of decision ruin his life but always running to something else thinking it'll be better and lead him to a good life, was brilliantly presented in a book called "The Star Rover" by Jack London. In it, the main character is a prisoner that can recall his past lives as a way of escaping from his current pain of being tortured. But in those lives things don't get any better and he's always getting into more and more trouble. "Being Human" falls as a pretentious art film with symbolisms that never work and stories that are difficult to be involved with. Luckily, they have Williams as a main actor and we root for him whatever the Hector he's playing. We care for Hector in all of his situations because there's something there that is involving enough to make us imagining what kind of decisions we would make if we were him. In at least, one of the stories you'll put yourself into Hector's shoes.

    Won't blame director/writer Bill Forsyth for the flaws presented here since this is not his original project, Warner Bros. Forced him to cut the film and include a narration that is quite excessive and too much explanatory. The narration (provided by Theresa Russell) of a film destined to grown up's treats its audience as children, explaining many things we're seeing on the screen. It ruined some parts of the film. Result: poor criticism, a box-office failure and now who knows this film? I sincerely hope that one day Forsyth come out of the shadows and show to the world this film in its integrity in a director's cut DVD (even the known version is hard to find).

    The things that attracted me into "Being Human" are the quality of the performances, not only Williams but also Turturro, Lorraine Bracco, Hector Elizondo, Jonathan Hyde, Anna Galiena, William H. Macy among others; the beautiful cinematography; Michael Gibbs fantastic musical score (specially the music presented when the movie enters into the 20th Century, a highly agitated theme). The story, at times, knows how to hold our interest but only for those who have an open mind to accept the concept of a man living over and over a similar life that bears only difference of costumes and periods of time. Hector's conditions and the way love acts in his life are quite the same, yet he fails to learn something from these experiences.

    Very problematic but not enough to make you feel bad about it, "Being Human" comes as a good film about valuable and noble lessons that sometimes crosses our paths in this long journey of life. 7/10.
  • It was an interesting idea to have a look at all the times people have been through, but the character and the writing need to be way more interesting. This is one of those movies you sit through just to see if it gets more interesting. I can tell you right now that it doesn't. So don't waste your time or money.
  • This is one of those comfortable Sunday-afternoon-while-it's-raining films. It is one of Robin Williams more serious characters.

    A little moody in places, the film offers reflections on what it might have been like to live at other times, as a sort of social history (no being a king or queen or royalty). The main character plays his life issues out through time, from ancient Rome, a Viking raid, a 16th or 17th century continental vagrant, to the present. Love, life's tragedies, children, and home are all themes. There is a light-heartiness to the film, and it plays on the contemporary character's life as it unfolds. Robin Williams turns in a typically great performance.

    The themes and emotions all play in their times. Settings are as varied as the emotions. Sweet and sentimental, the movie captures and makes a statement about the human condition.
  • Glaschu16 August 1999
    The first scene, sometimes referred to as cavemen, Goths or Vikings in reviews seems more accurately to be ancient Celts. The language they speak is made of broken Scottish or Irish Gaelic. On the other hand, maybe it was Robin Williams who was the Celt and the marauders spoke broken Gaelic because it was foreign to them. Hmmm. Without more information (they are a fairly laconic lot) I would assume they are probably a rival tribe of fellow Gaelic-speaking Celts of Scotland or Ireland. This was a welcome tidbit at the beginning of the film and probably added to my enjoyment.

    I appreciated the attempt to portray the ordinariness of life throughout the ages and I view the slowness of the film in this light. Life is often slow. These were interesting vignette-like character studies of one man who is never able to be completely in control of situations around him, but who perseveres.
  • In Being Human, the movie title should explain to you mostly what it's about. This is not so. If the character William's is portraying is human, then we might as well call ourselves droids. His stiff way of acting and terrible forms of expression harm the respect one holds for him as an actor. Sure the script is bad and it should have stayed as a book or whatever, but whoever wasted their money to produce this tape of diaster was simply not aware of exactally how bad this movie is. And yes, if you analyze it to death I'm sure you can find parallels and connections to human responses to different situations, but for the regular people who just want to enjoy a movie, don't bother with this one. Nothing to enjoy. And if you happen to notice that Ewan McGregor's in it, yeah, definatly not worth sitting through to catch his evil glare and two one liners. I'd rather see a role where he actually gets to use his talent. This movie sucked. I'm sorry to rest of you who thought is was under rated, but honestly, I think you're just a Robin Williams fan justifying a bad choice.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    WARNING: SPOILERS THROUGHOUT

    Watched this one with the wife last night, a neat little philosophical tale of the human condition. A connect the dots aspect ties five stories surrounding a central character, Hector, as he searches for true happiness in different eras of human history. This recurring soul just can't seem to get it right, but keeps trying none the less.

    The director uses visual and character cues to identify the key elements that connect the stories and Hector's search for happiness: beaches/water, shoes and the importance of finding a good pair, windmills/crosses, priests, home/getting home, slaves and flowers/scents. Some or all of these elements show up in each of the stories The director uses these elements to exemplify the repetitive nature of history, how man's search for true happiness is a continuing struggle regardless of our place in history.

    While the film presents a rich tapestry on which it tells it's tale, the plot, even the basic premise, ends up lost within the richness. Why can't our hero find true happiness? It's hard to say and the film never gets around to it. But take heart, perhaps one of your future lives will find true happiness.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's hard to tell what being human really is supposed to look like from these nebulous vignettes by Robin Williams. The best I can come up with is the above equation, but I don't really think that was his goal in this ill-advised attempt at a serious film about the subject.

    First, the narrators, far from provoking interest in the upcoming material, bore us to death with pretentious generalizations and leading questions until we no longer care much what's coming as long as it means they'll soon shut up for a while as the next vignette is dramatized.

    Second, Robin's recurring male character, Hector, presents us with a rather doubtful example of humanity, since he is out of step with the rest of his peers. How can Hector be a valid example when there are so many humans that contradict his character? Far from being an everyman, he is a marginal example at best. He never seems to aspire to anything higher than his own selfish desires. He takes advantage of people with nobler aspirations, and then wonders why they disparage him as a loser and a fool. If being human means being largely clueless about virtues, I guess that shows something, but I'm not buying it. Using a recurring male character as the focus of humanity seems also to be rather sexist, doesn't it?

    Then there's the whole question of whether reincarnation is implied..... Unfortunately, nothing in this film is consistent enough to say one way or the other. If Hector is being reincarnated, he's going to be at it for a long time, since he's not learning anything from one cycle to the next. He hates being a slave, but then becomes the same type of foolish master that he himself had in a previous incarnation. I think it's best to just not consider this question further, since either way this film proves nothing about being human either way.

    Bottom line, if Hector is being human, then count me out of humanity, PLEASE!
  • In the first story a caveman's family is taken away by raiders despite he does his best for stopping them and she recommends him to take care of the children. In the second story Hector (Robin Williams) is a slave to the foolish Lucinnius (John Turturro) who loses his fortune and finds forced to kill himself, and Hector helps him in doing so but can't return to his family because he becomes slave to another man. In the third story Hector is a Spanish crusader that has to return to his family, but can't because he befriends a priest (Vincent D'Onofrio) and even wants to join him. In the fourth story he is a portuguese man in the Renaissance shipwrecked in Africa and his wife from the previous story here is his lover. In the fifth and final story Hector lives in the present New York and is helped by his wife and kids to find a good way in life since he is in sorrow for the mistakes he did in his past lives, and they too, deal with this.

    BEING HUMAN is certainly not a movie for everyone, but it's one of the most original movies I have ever seen. The way the stories are connected is focused and it makes you think and ask the question if you might have been someone in another life in the past. Robin Williams gives one of his most straight performances of his career as the same man in different settings that has always different challenges connected to one thing. The need to return to his family. The supporting cast (Turturro, D'Onofrio, WIlliam Macy and a few others) are all pretty entertaining and the direction is very focused.

    Overall, one of the most unique movies you can find and mostly recommended to folks who on occasion love seeing something different. I would also recommend to not think too much while watching, because your head might explode if you focus too much on the details and try to analyze them.
  • You're dropped in medias res into various historical vignettes with Robin Williams role playing men in different time periods.

    The stories are supposed to have some connection to each other. Most of them feature vaguely similar elements, such as priests, slaves, and, of course, female love interests for Williams' character.

    So the filmmakers wax philosophical, but it falls flat on its face. Most of the stories aren't fleshed out well enough to really get a grasp of what's happening. The one where they're stranded on a desert, especially, makes very little sense without backstory. Despite the presence of Robin Williams, there's no comedy to speak of either, and the drama is ineffective.

    The narrator with the obnoxious voice and speaking style also gets less loquacious as the movie goes along. I think she doesn't even talk at all during the last story.

    It might have been helped by a little bit more backstory by the narrator or story development within each piece by the filmmakers, but even that probably wouldn't have saved it. The film is disjointed, a bit boring, and pointless. The philosophical message tying all the stories together doesn't spring up effectively and the movie didn't need to be in such a convoluted format. As it stands, only the bit where Robin Williams was a slave was very interesting. The rest was just Robin Williams playing random roles in bits of mediocre movies.

    Honourable Mentions: The Human Condition (1959). The title of both of these works is extremely arrogant, somehow promising to finally put the whole human condition on display but failing miserably. Human Condition was definitely less arrogant in its assumption, though.
  • MARS19 February 2001
    This is a really interesting film. Liked the concept of watching some questions on the nature of humanity being explored through different time periods. The tone was light (helped by Robin Williams performance), which I enjoyed tremendously. I think what really made the film for me was the last 10 minutes where Hector reconciles with his children. In terms of dialogue and advise, this scene alone I found uplifting and by itself worth the price of renting the film.
  • Jackass-526 May 1999
    What was Robin thinking when he did this movie? It was horrible!! The acting was good but there was no story to it. It was really boring too, no action or comedy, or anything! Blah blah blah, I really didn't like it.
  • I honestly had no idea what to expect when I first heard about this film. All I knew was that it was composed of five separate stories that spanned centuries, with Robin Williams as the link between all of them. Sounds quite ambitious, right? Yes, but the end result was underwhelming and, dare I say it, a little dull. There are, however, some major themes explored here as indicated by the title. I guess if you were to boil the film down to its essence, it is, simply put, about being human. Being more specific, it is about mankind's search and need for companionship and family, along with all of the other small things, good and bad, which enter into our lives on our journey through time. Robin Williams' character Hector, a name which he has for the entire film, can be said to literally make a journey through time. It's not explicitly stated, but since he does keep the same name throughout, you could say that his character in each subsequent story is a reincarnation of who he is in the previous one. This is all fine, but there were some spots which felt underdeveloped and worst of all, the film is practically destroyed by some of the worst voice-over narration I've ever heard. Thankfully, by the final segment the narration isn't so omnipresent. By far the worst effect of the narration is to replace character development and spoon-feed the film's themes to the audience. I did a little research online, and apparently the director, Bill Forsyth, had to cut 40 minutes and add the narration after an initial cut had a poor test screening. It's a pity that that early version isn't available to watch, because I think the film would be better in that form. The closest I think the film got was the final segment, but that one segment didn't exactly make up for all that came before it. But it did tie the film together thematically, and provide a satisfying conclusion to the larger story arc. Overall it was a satisfactory watch, but it still felt like it was missing something. Better films like this would be CLOUD ATLAS and THE FOUNTAIN, but there are still elements to appreciate in this film.
  • filipemanuelneto10 June 2018
    This film follows five men and their problems, in five distinct historical epochs, ranging from the Neolithic to our time. What is common among all of them? The character has to be brave and face the problems. And, of course, all are played by Robbin Williams in one of his few serious and dramatic roles.

    The film tells five isolated stories. They are short, have no great meaning, and are not particularly interesting. Bill Forsyth, the director / writer, seems to have tried to pursue any philosophical approach in all of this which, I confess, has totally escaped my eye. The fact that the film presents so many disjointed stories is equally confusing and makes the film annoying. We have never adhered to the film nor to what it presents. It is as if there is a wall between the film (the mind of its creator) and the audience. That makes it all a boring, not to say detestable, cinematic experience.

    Although the film itself is bad, it counts on a good cast headed by Robbin Williams (in one of its rare dramatic works). We can also name the names of Robert Carlyle, Theresa Russell and Ewan McGregor. I believe everyone did their best, but with such bad material it was hard to do miracles.
  • Contrary to some negative reviews, this is neither a bad film nor one of Forsythe's "worst." Such criticism issues from the fact that this film is about the lives of ordinary people, with Robin Williams playing a succession of classic Everyman characters. As such, most people won't find it "entertaining" enough, particularly if they're of the gimme-gimme-now post-MTV generations. This film tells stories about small people, not notable ones, and the emotions which they feel.

    *Being Human* is a slow and philosophical story--as the title suggests, it's a story about what it is to be human. Love, loss, slavery, hopelessness, faithfulness, lust, hope--all these themes are touched upon as the story moves throughout the ages, presenting us with various Everyman characters all played by Robin Williams in what are surely his best dramatic performances.

    This film is much like *My Dinner with Andre*--a truly meaningful and important film which isn't meant to appeal to everyone, just a more intellectual crowd. Its unfortunate spate of negative reviews comes from the fact that, unlike *My Dinner with Andre*, it was targeted for broader public consumption with a fairly large theatrical release, and to this day plays on premium cable channels to audiences who want to be watching fast-paced blockbusters rather than introspections into our humanity.

    If you can appreciate a film with a slower and more deliberate pace and real insights into humanity, watch *Being Human*. It's a masterpiece.
  • This is my favorite Bill Forsythe picture, and probably Robin Williams' best work in one of those subdued yet utterly involved performances we all know he's capable of (_What Dreams May Come_, _...Garp_, _Good Will Hunting_, etc.) yet seldom see from him. It's much more serious than Forsythe's prior work (Local Hero, Comfort & Joy, etc.), but shares with them his quietly surreal sensibility.

    Excellent supporting cast, and Forsythe's peculiar talent for making gray skies and barren landscapes seem beautiful is strongly in evidence. I waited eagerly for this to hit theatres, but it was apparently pulled from release; I hope to see it on a big screen someday.

    This is not a movie that rewards casual viewing -- but more serious, involved viewing is repaid handsomely.
  • Could be the movie that had the greatest impact on me of all time, no doubt more than likely because I was going through the identical same struggle with fatherhood at the moment I saw it. It was shortly after release on satellite in summer of 1995 (we had an early 10-foot dish) and I saw it with my "new" family at our home in an old mining town in Arizona. I had just gotten home from work and in stone cold sobriety managed to see myself in turn so exquisitely entrapped in the same quandaries as "Hector" that specifically at the moment of the simple act of his being given a pair of boots during the African shipwreck vignette, I had to run outside into the cool starry night. The top of my head seemed to explode and my "self" spontaneously shifted levels and merged with the consciousness of the universe. I unaccountably became a bodhisattva for some months (i. e. you could say I flipped my lid.) My co-workers were terrified of me when I returned to work, but my family and most everyone else I knew marveled at the change and soon grew to approve of it. For a while I was like John Travolta's character in "Phenomenon." This kind of effect from watching a movie isn't unheard of in history. In fact it occurred to me on another occasion upon reading a tiny little book by an author with the pseudonym "Alcyone." That a movie or book can have that type of effect on another human being implies that it's nothing short of marvelous, some kind of mystic key. I don't want to be a spoiler so I'll say nothing more than that. I saw it only that one time, and it worked magic on me that I still can't comprehend. What a director...
An error has occured. Please try again.