The Firm (1993) Poster

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
252 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
If It Sounds Too Good To Be True, It Probably Is.
jzappa28 May 2010
In this excitingly convoluted genre piece by Sydney Pollack---who blossomed into a straightforwardly commercial director who was happily a part of the commercial mainstream, unlike such surviving contemporaries as Sidney Lumet and Woody Allen---Tom Cruise plays Mitch McDeere, a poor boy who is embarrassed by his meager roots now that he has graduated from Harvard Law fifth in his class. He gets offers from the top law firms in New York and Chicago, yet ultimately opts for a smaller firm stationed in Memphis. His choice is money-minded. He regards money as peace of mind, however later in the film he is less certain than he's ever been of how flush he'd need to have to be truly at peace.

Some movies about the law reduce the judiciary elements to the rank of incidental. This one squeezes them for all they're worth. Without betraying too much of the story, I can say that McDeere is soon enough being blackmailed by both the FBI and the firm's security chief, grizzled and mild Wilford Brimley, quite compelling in an unusual jaunt as a bad guy. To protect himself, Mitch has to exercise both mind and body, eluding hit men and outwitting lawyers, to save both his life and his license to practice law.

Drawn from the novel by John Grisham, as adapted by three of the most high-priced screenwriters at the time, this star-studded suspense melodrama takes an admirable two and a half hours to work its way through a hair-splitting ethical hodgepodge. By the finale, regardless of McDeere's gasping expounding during phone calls in the middle of a chase sequence, his plan of action is bewildering. And then there is the one character who never saw two particular killers when she witnessed another character's death because she was totally enclosed and hidden, which is how she survived, but in a later scene with Mitch, she says she saw the killers and details what they looked like, even the color of one's eyes, the one actually being an albino. However, it doesn't seem as far-fetched as it would were the style of the movie not as competent even when the fine points were bleary.

Sydney Pollack, usually a solid director of easy-going entertainment, liked to make big, demanding movies and he was secure working with huge stars. Whether or not that colors his movies with a sugar-coated worthiness, he utilized them as abbreviated exposition. Case in point: One glance at Hal Holbrook as the top dog of the Firm and we sense it's a suspicious organization. Holbrook almost always plays the ostensibly dignified man with skeletons in his closet. One look at Gene Hackman, as the law partner who becomes Cruise's coach, and we know he's an incredibly faulty yet essentially not such a bad man, as he always is. One look at Cruise and we get a complacent feeling, because he is, in lots of his roles, just a little slow to figure things out. His characters appear to trust people too readily, and so it seems authentic when he accepts the Firm's song and dance and inducements.

The movie is practically a compilation of great small character performances. Ed Harris, menacing with a shaved head, mainly requires little more than a couple of concise appearances to persuasively disclose the FBI's case against the Firm, and to divulge its airy readiness to force a potential witness to undergo impossible duress. Another potent performance is by David Strathairn, as the brother McDeere hasn't told the Firm about. Strathairn has arisen as one of the most commanding character actors around. There are also rich performances by Gary Busey, as an articulate private eye, and especially by Holly Hunter, as his allegiant secretary. Actually, watching this high falutin' legal thriller, it hit me that law firms have to some extent usurped Army platoons as Hollywood's most enjoyed universal human setting. The new law thrillers have the same components as those reliable old World War II action films: Assorted cultural and character archetypes who battle each other when they're not battling the enemy. The law movies have one formidable leg-up: the female characters engage equally in the fray, rather than simply cooking, cleaning and writing letters.

The vast peanut gallery of characters makes The Firm into a persuasive Hollywood landscape. There are enough convincing people here to give McDeere a genuine environment to inhabit. And Pollack was forbearing inwith some ways with his material. He would allow a scene to go on until the point was made somewhat more acutely. That would let an actor like Hackman be stunningly compelling in scenes where he delicately authenticates that, in spite of everything, he has a decent soul. A sensitive scene near the climax between Hackman and Tripplehorn is like an advanced course in acting. The parts of The Firm seem better than the whole. And there are some great parts.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Complex Suspense-Drama
ccthemovieman-118 March 2006
This is a long (154 minutes) but pretty solid drama-suspense story about corporate corruption. The film features a well-known cast, and as soon as the action kicks in this becomes a very tense story.

Tom Cruise is very good as the hotshot lawyer, as is Jeanne Tripplehorn who plays his unhappy wife. This is a complex story at times, one not always easily understood, especially the ending. So much is explained so fast at the end it's tough to comprehend it all.

Wilfred Brimley, Gene Hackman, Hal Holbrook, Holly Hunter, Robert Strathairn and Ed Harris all make this a really deep, impressive cast. For more details of the story, check some of the other reviews.
60 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
firmly implanted
lee_eisenberg3 July 2006
When "The Firm" came out was - believe it or not - the first time that I had ever heard of Tom Cruise (although I didn't see the movie until several years later). And let me tell you, this was a great introduction. Cruise plays novice lawyer Mitch McDeere, who goes to work for a Memphis firm. With this firm, he has everything that anyone could want. But there's the question: why does everything seem so perfect? The answer lies in the firm's unseemly other side. And they're not just going to let Mitch blow their cover.

Sydney Pollack pulled off everything perfectly here. It's sort of like an Ira Levin novel how everything plays out. You may be suspicious of everything after seeing this movie. Above all, it shows that Tom Cruise can actually do a good job when he tries. Also starring Jeanne Tripplehorn, Gene Hackman, Hal Holbrook, Wilford Brimley, Ed Harris, Holly Hunter, David Strathairn and Gary Busey.

It's hard to believe that this was the first movie adaptation of a John Grisham novel.
39 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Joining a law firm from hell can be detrimental to your health...
Doylenf5 May 2001
All the elements to make a hard-hitting melodrama of corruption (with FBI and Mafia aspects present) are unfolded here in a gripping yarn from John Grisham's novel. Tom Cruise is excellent as a young man who joins a small but prosperous law firm, only to discover that all the perks he enjoys come at great expense to his integrity, not to mention his life. The plot thickens when members of the firm are murdered and Cruise gets drawn into the unmasking of the firm, risking his life to reveal the criminals. Gene Hackman, Ed Harris, Holly Hunter and Hal Holbrook all give strong performances, with Hunter fully deserving her Oscar nomination. The pacing is good despite the film's length (well over 2 1/2 hrs.) and there's seldom a dull moment. Especially gripping is the supercharged climax.

Not having read the book, I see where others are disappointed with the ending. Having no comparison to make, I can only say that it kept me absorbed until the final scene. Definitely a must-see if you enjoy action thrillers with a climactic punch. One of the best films of the '90s, full of suspenseful twists and turns.
76 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Can a thriller about lawyers thrill? Beware a plot filled with technical twists.
secondtake25 May 2010
The Firm (1993)

The twist in the plot as you realize this Memphis law firm is not what it seems, and the rather innocent freshman lawyer played by Tom Cruise is slow to catch on, is the core of the movie, and a relief. It starts steadily, or slowly, depending on your patience, and in fact plays many scenes out in more detail than we need for a kind of bookish thriller. It's not a bad ride, and there are some further, minor twists, but it's not packed tightly enough, or frankly original enough, to lift its boots out of the sand.

Director Sydney Pollack, hugely successful as a director and actor, might have just had bad scriptwriting here by David Rabe, because John Grisham's book had proved itself. The acting is really solid (I'm no Cruise fan, but he's fine), but the characters are often doing things that just don't quite follow, or that are improbable or stupid. Or they end up doing something dangerous and the danger is either watered down or ridiculous. Examples that come to mind are how they show Cruise discovering or stealing or xeroxing files. We get the plot, but it lumbers along, or is just shown, not built up with suspense. The cinematographer takes a hit here, I think. Things are often nicely framed and routinely well done, but a thriller needs to hide some things, show some things, create ambiance and mystery, and so on, visually. It doesn't really happen.

So, for a kind of technical high-stakes, rich person's good-guy bad-guy suspense film, it will get you through, but barely. By the last five minutes, if you aren't sucked in, you'll want to scream "hurry up!"
36 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A law thriller that will please everyone
patryk-czekaj7 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I always assumed that no movie based on John Grisham's books can be boring. Why? Because all of them include the most gripping and thrilling stories ever. And it can't be denied that one of their most amazing aspects is that they are perfectly fitted to be adapted onto the big screen.

I wanted to watch this film since the time that I have finished reading The Firm, this amazing book, which turned Grisham into a world class writer. I craved for more of its pure excellence. I just needed to see Sydney Pollack's vision. And I am so happy to say right now that he certainly didn't let me down.

Tom Cruise, still in his early days of glory, is an ideal Mitch McDeere, the young, ambitious and somehow innocent young lawyer. The man just passed the bar exam and started looking for a job. And then he found what he thought was a perfect opportunity for a well-paid job of his dreams. Unfortunately, this all seemed a bit too good to be totally legit and risk-free. But, at the time, who could tell that this particular firm is controlled by a group of dangerous Mafia thugs?

This is the moment when the fun starts. The fast-paced sequences begin to roll. The viewer starts to uncover one secret after another of the overly corrupted Bendini, Lambert & Locke law firm. The suspense is heightening with every scene and that is what makes you concentrated all the time. You simply don't want to miss any part of the action. And I can assure everybody, it won't stop until the last minute.

This is what makes the movie so similar to the book - you just can't stop till you know the whole story all the way through.

Of course they had to do some rewrites and cut out some of the scenes and subplots (even though the movie is still relatively long). This is probably why the movie seems a bit chaotic at times. Also, I didn't like what the did with the ending, it should have stayed as it was described in the book.

On another topic, I love the way that all of the great supporting characters build up the plot. And the stars that play them. One of the most memorable cameos of this movie must be the one made by Gary Busey.

The only person that really didn't convince me was Jeanne Tripplehorn. I pictured Mitch's wife very differently - let's just say she seemed more beautiful and appealing in my mind. However, that still didn't stop Gene Hackman's character as he tried to seduce her in the most adorable way (one of the best scenes in my opinion).

Even though I found the book more exciting than the movie, I still highly recommend it for its ever-occurring suspense and the atmosphere that causes shivers on the back. You won't find many law thrillers like this one for sure - except maybe for other Grisham masterpieces.

8/10
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Intense drama film 6/10
saadanathan7 October 2020
Sydney Pollak made an interesting and remarkable movie, "The Firm" is an intense drama movie with many dramatic moments worth watching. Though it's a two and a half hour movie where it's mostly "walk and talk" scenes and can feel boring at some point. "The Firm" does deliver it's moments and advantages, such as the score composed by Dave Grusin. Tom Cruise is also an advantage cause of his acting skills and devotion to the role. Overall a nice movie with drama that gets intense at the very end. Maybe not suggested for everyone, if you don't like the kind of movies where it's mostly lawyer stuff and "walk and talk" scenes, so this movie may not be for you.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An excellent legal thriller. One of Tom Cruise's best performances.
Anonymous_Maxine14 March 2001
Warning: Spoilers
In The Firm, Tom Cruise plays an extremely intelligent young lawyer who takes a job with a tremendous firm, having been seduced by their huge financial offerings. "The Firm" begins to sound very creepy very early in the film, when it becomes known that 'the firm' has never had a divorce, 'the firm' encourages children,' 'the firm' is a big, happy, 41 member family. Unfortunately, it seems that another interesting little side note is that no one has ever left 'the firm' and lived.

Mitch McDeere (Cruise) is hired by 'the firm,' and at first, everything is great. The firm loves him enough to pay back all of his student loans all at once, and he is completely taken in by everything, even down to the way that the firm furnished his new house, in his beautiful new neighborhood ('To make you feel at home. Hope you don't mind.'). The lives of Mitch and his wife Abby (Jeanne Triplehorn) are completely and drastically changed when he is hired by the firm, setting up a disorienting atmosphere, especially when strange things start happening, people getting killed by boat bombs and whatnot.

Gary Busey plays a small, seedy role, and it works really well because he's best at playing seedy characters. Ed Harris also delivers a good performance as an FBI agent trying to coerce McDeere into helping them investigate the big bad firm. It seems that McDeere has been helping the firm in its illegal activities, making him guilty without him even knowing about it. If he doesn't help the FBI, he'll go to jail with the other 40 members of that big, happy family.

The Firm really gets going once McDeere starts trying to investigate, making copies of incriminating files, etc. Some things may have gone a little too far, like the conveniently placed pillow truck, but as a whole, The Firm is a great thriller. It may not be quite as good as other John Grisham adaptations, The Rainmaker, in particular, but The Firm's complex and fascinating plot, as well as good direction and acting, makes it way above average.
143 out of 160 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Whats with the Piano???
dwn-6358418 January 2020
It's supposed to be a thriller/action/mystery of this FIRM... But in every built up scene they play this happy go lucky jolly piano that doesn't go with the movie in the slightest. I mean maybe once or twice. But after the 20th time of hearing it in spots where it doesn't belong.. It's downright ANNOYING!!!! Rating would be higher if not for the worst soundtrack decision in movie history!
38 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Lawyer/Client Privilege
bkoganbing30 June 2007
Tom Cruise, the All American kid from the trailer park who worked his way through Harvard Law School, just got the dream job with a prestigious white shoe law firm in Memphis, Tennessee. Sounds like he's on his way to the top with wife Jeanne Tripplehorn. But it turns out to be a nightmare.

This Firm's main client is a Chicago crime family and they launder the mob's money. Now the FBI in the persons of fatherly Steven Hill and hard-nosed Ed Harris are squeezing Cruise to infiltrate and get incriminating information. That would result in disbarment for violating lawyer/client privilege. And The Firm isn't a gang of boy scouts either. They're not above a little blackmail and entrapment and they've got a security man in Wilford Brimley who's real good at it.

How Tom Cruise gets out of this rock and a hard place situation is the plot of The Firm. Sydney Pollak gave him one stylish cast in support and everyone of them delivers. Even players like Gary Busey, Hal Holbrook, Gene Hackman, take essentially supporting roles because this film was a guaranteed blockbuster. All of John Grisham's novels have their own built in audience, The Firm is no exception. I do remember my mother was a devoted reader of his work, whereas I always await the film version.

Holly Hunter got an Oscar nomination for her small role as private detective Gary Busey's secretary and girl Friday. When Hunter witnesses Busey's murder without the hit men knowing it, she sets the wheels in motion for the downfall of the bad guys. Hunter got nominated for Best Actress for The Piano and Best Supporting Actress for The Firm, a most unusual occurrence. She won for The Piano in 1993, but lost the Supporting Actress Award to her co-star in The Piano, Anna Paquin. Winning both would have just been a bit too much for the Academy voters.

The Firm has a far fetched plot to be sure in the way that Tom Cruise brings them all down. Still that's the charm of it. It's almost Hitchcockian in its pace and mood, and even more resembles the Mission Impossible television series in the way it's all brought off. Small wonder that Tom Cruise was chosen to star in the big screen adaptations of that television classic.

When I watch The Firm, I'm reminded of that line from another television classic that one Hannibal Smith used to say about he loved it when a plan comes together. That's what you will like about The Firm.
49 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Watchable
Angeneer28 May 2000
While the plot holes are immense, it is in general good entertainment. It goes smoothly and if you turn off your brain (especially in the end) you could possibly enjoy it. The first hour is even building up some tension! Oddly, I thought the bed scene of Jeanne Tripplehorn and Gene Hackman emitted more eroticism than Tripplehorn and Cruise. Paul Sorvino and Joe Viterelli are extremely miscast. When I first saw them at the airport scene I thought the film diverts to a mob comedy!
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Better than the book! (*and possible spolier!*)
smee346931 May 2001
I read "The Firm" after watching it, not knowing what expect (I didn't know if it would be a tight or loose adaptation). It was pretty close, with the difference mainly lying in the ending, and that where Sydney Pollack makes this story go from good to great: The book, at the end, makes Mitch out to be a coward and a traitor at the end, by making him give into the FBI. But, in the film, Mitch is seen as a hero who doesn't give into anyone. The FBI doesn't win and the Mafia doesn't win. Mitch wins. He bows down to no one. Tom Cruise also plays a *great* Mitch McDeere, with a lot of intensity and charisma. You cheer for him as the protagonist. Holly Hunter is top-notch with her portrayal of the vulnerable, secretary turned accomplice Tammy. Gene Hackman is also great as Avery Tolar, the one bad guy who sympathizes with Mitch and Abby. Such a great screen presence. His scenes while they're in the Kaymen Islands are key ones to watch. Jeanne Tripplehorn finally makes up for her role in "Basic Instinct" as Abby McDeere, the "cheated wife", not only by her husband, but also by the firm he works for. Sydney Pollack showcases some of his best work as director, especially by the opening segment that describes Mitch McDeere perfectly in the span of less than 10 minutes.

Such a GREAT adaptation, and a even better film to watch!
65 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tortured Plot Device But Great Cast in Some Fine Moments
Danusha_Goska15 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Hitchcock called the plot device that kicks everything into gear the "MacGuffin."

Is there a less plausible, more tortured MacGuffin than the one used here? The Mafia creates an elaborate conspiracy to get lawyers to work for it.

Huh? Lawyers have been happy to work for mob money for a very long time. That's one reason there are so many lawyer jokes.

There are some notable moments in this otherwise mediocre thriller, though.

* The albino assassin. The Da Vinci Code also has an albino assassin. I think it's high time that the National Association for the Advancement of Albino Assassins protests Hollywood's blatant stereotyping.

* David Strathairn. Any movie with DS in it is worth watching. (Okay, excepting "Limbo.") He has two fine moments: a prisoner, he expresses a wish to see the sky; out of jail, he tells a woman how pretty her mouth looks; she says, "That's not even my best feature." I wish there had been a sequel built on those two stars' chemistry.

* It's amazing to confront how good looking Tom Cruise was when he was younger. He's still good looking, of course, but when this film was made he was at his peak.

It's fashionable to mock Cruise these days, but he deserves credit. He was almost eerie good looking when he was younger, and yet, unlike, say, a Matthew Mcconaughey or Brad Pitt who let their prettiness just sit up there on screen without doing much with it, Cruise had the drive of a Jimmy Cagney or other actors who had to get past their lack of prettiness. Cruise's drive is something to watch.

* Jeanne Tripplehorn is so pretty but so boring to watch. And she and Cruise have zero chemistry.

* There's an amazing scene where an older Gene Hackman attempts to seduce younger, prettier JT.

Hackman's so poignant in this part, and the part was so well written, that you wish that that storyline had had its own movie.

* And, the Elvis imitator/catfish truck driver was kind of interesting ...

And no movie with Ed Harris in it is a complete waste of time.
14 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Nice performances, clotted plot
rmax3048234 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
You really can't fault any of the performers here. Tom Cruise has a boyish high-school handsomeness and an unthinkingly naive demeanor to go with it. Jeanne Triplehorn has big dark soulful eyes and does and says what she's supposed to. But the lesser actors are the more interesting. And they are here in droves. Gene Hackman, the late What's-his-name Viterelli (I can only think of him as "Jelly" in "Analyze This"), Holly Hunter looking sexy and sassy, a hypomanic Gary Busey who, when capable of it, really delivers, Paul Sorvino who underplays (honest), Hal Holbrook and Wilfred Brimley being nasty, poor Tobin Bell as the albino who must have played a dozen hit men and mass murderers by now, Ed Harris now with a completely shaved head, Terry Kinney as the pale blond nice guy who conceals his demons, and Steven Hill as a ruthless FBI man.

The performances and the locations make this worth a dekko. This ought to be Sidney Pollack's turf alright -- corruption in a law firm and illegal activities by the authorities, the kind of polluted panorama that he often finds appealing. But somehow it doesn't come off. I haven't read John Grisham's book but it's hard to believe the plot could be as complicated as this movie. There were times when I was completely lost, especially towards the end when the firm begins to unravel and the chases and breathless phone calls start.

Probably the most interesting character's is Gene Hackman's crooked but very human lawyer. His scenes with Tripplehorn are really quite good, his hesitations, awkward silences, embarrassed chuckles, and vapid smiles. His last scene with her, as he lies half drugged in bed, is outstanding.

The ending is hard to swallow. Cruise gives the Feds just enough legal information to put the bad guys away for several years, based on the fact that the firm overbilled its clients and used the post office to do it, which is a federal offense. A clever move on the part of Cruise but I had a hard time visualizing these murdering wealthy perps doing any jail time. I mean, for what? For sending a client a bill that charged too much? That would put my plumber in jail, my doctor, my shrink, and a strange porno web site that I once unwittingly subscribed to -- but these guys? Nope. Even if they were convicted, I see Dershowitz handling the appeal
50 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alternate Screenplay
thebaldguy8 November 2003
I wanted to get a copy of the screenplay to compare the movie with the dialog and directions, but initially received the FIRST draft by David Rabe. I finally got the shooting script later. All I can say is that it ended with Mc Deere blowing away all the partners in a restaurant with an AK-47. It really made me appreciate the re-write by David Rayfiel and Robert Towne. I have watched this movie many times and enjoy the suspense, romance, and Grusin's solo piano score, which always blows me away. But the one thing that impressed me most with multiple viewing, is how Gene Hackman really makes the movie work. His portrayal of this corrupt, but incredably likeable character is the one thread that holds the movie together for me and goes down as one of his most memorable acting performances.
41 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent Thriller
dwn-6358418 January 2020
Cruise is in top not form. Tripplehorn, Hackman and Harris are all great supporting actors. Just 1 problem. The soundtrack has wayyyy too much piano that doesn't fit at all with the pace of the movie. Or really anything at all with it. Takes away from the drama. Bad bad job of whoever decided on the piano for the key moments of the movie...
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the best Grisham adaptations
frankde-jong14 November 2020
The first half of the 90s were good years for Grisham adaptations. Within two years three films went into circulation: "The firm" (1993, Sydney Pollack), "The pelican brief" (1993, Alan J. Pakula) and "The client" (1994, Joel Schumacher). In most of these films either the beginning or the end convinces. In for example "The pelican brief" the beginning is hard to believe, but when you are "into the story" the film is really tense. In "The firm" on the other hand, it is the beginning that I found rather disturbing. The way the main character (lawyer Mitch McDeere played bt Tom Cruise) gets into trouble seems very plausible. In the end however the film goes sadly in the overdrive, with unnecessary action scenes. The middle part is somewhere in between.

What is so good about the beginning of "The firm"? In my opinion two things. In the first place it is very understandble that Harvard graduate and social climber Mitch McDeere, not used to luxury, succumbs to "the offer you can't refuse" that a law firm offers him and so joins a company which happens to engage in and facilitate shady deals. In the second place the impact of this on the relationship with his girlfriend Abby (Jeanne Tripplehorn). Abby comes from a more wealthy family than Mitch and understands that there are no free lunches. Mitch interprets the fact that the employer arranges a house and interferes actively with the private life of their employees (they prefer that the wives do not have a job and stimulate children) as togetherness (the frm as one bg family). With Abby the alarm bells ring earlier. She interprets it not as togetherness but as as making the employee as dependent on the firm as possible.

By the way director Pollack shows at a very early stage that the firm does not only arranges a house, but that this house is full of eavesdropping equipment. He thereby uses a technique of Hitchcock (let the viewer know more than the main characters).

The middle part of the film (starting with the first encounter of Mitch and FBI detective Wayne Tarrance (Ed Harris)) is something weaker than the opening, but still rather good. It is only in the final part (starting with the cooperation of Mitch and Tammy Hemphill (Holy Hunter)) that the movie gives away to an overkill of action scenes.

That "The firm" only slightly detoriorates after such a strong opening is due to a couple of strong supporting roles (beside the main characters Mitch and Abby). For example Hal Holbrook as one of the founders of the lawfirm, seeming a nice and trustworthy old man, being the lawyer of the mafia. Or Gene Hackman as Avery Tolar, the mentor of Mitch. He is a decent man suspecting too little too late, and now he is totally dependant on the firm.

There are also a couple of strong scenes that boosts the average of especially the midlle part of the film. I think of the following scenes:

The first lunch of Mitch and Avery in which Avery tells Mitch that the firm is strict on alcohol during working hours, and directly after that orders a martini himself. The first meeting of Mitch and FBI detective Tarrance in a restaurant. Mitch is studying for his bar exam, Tarrance is talking to a colleague on a nearby table. Tarrance makes (deliberately too loud) a few remarks about the law firm of Mitch, that sets his suspicion in motion. The second meeting of Mitch and a young street artist. The first time Mitch has the energy to participate in the act. The second time Mitch listlessly passes by. He is well on his way to become a second Avery.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth a watch due to an interesting story line and decent acting
Ed-Shullivan21 February 2020
I can't honestly say that I am a big fan of the little man Tom Cruise, but his supporting cast includes Gene Hackman, Jeanne Tripplehorn, Ed Harris, Wilford Brimley, and Holly Hunter and with the film being based on a popular John Grisham novel so the film did not disappoint us. Mrs. Shullivan was late coming home while the film was underway and it immediately caught her undivided attention even though she missed the first half of the film. So captivating was the story line about a top notch Memphis law firm who launders money for the mob, and as the young lawyers serve their purpose are each mysteriously found dead under even more suspicious circumstances.

Tom Cruise plays Mitch McDeere, who just graduated with honors second in his class from Harvard University and is the next "chosen one" for the small Memphis firm who woos the wonder boy with a healthy starting salary, a sports car as well as a house. His assigned mentor is the smooth talking Avery Tolar (Gene Hackman) who immediately takes wonder boy Mitch to the Bahamas to close his first big investment deal.

To complete the perfect life, Mitch needs the perfect wife who happens to be the independent wealthy heir Abby (Jeanne Tripplehorn) who is not hypnotized by their sudden wealth (as Mitch is) as she comes from a family of wealth. The film has a great story line with continued intrigue and suspense and above average cast of great actors/actresses that I did enjoy.

A decent 7 out of 10 rating
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A great suspense thriller
arthurclay2 January 2005
This movie was the movie that finally drove the fact home to me that Tom Cruise was a good actor and pushed him to the front of the line. The casting was really really great and the plot was first rate. Cruise is a fresh out of college law student named Mitch with a pretty new wife who is dreaming of becoming a successful and big name lawyer. So as any other graduate he is sending out resumes and getting offers from different firms. But one firm from Memphis, Tennessee gives him an offer he can't refuse. It seems like a small homegrown firm that is very wealthy and prosperous and prides itself on being the best. But this isn't any ordinary law firm. It's a "Family" with a history of partners having premature deaths and now Mitch is part of it. And he can't get out. Not alive anyways. So Mitch has to find a way out without joining the list of expired former associates. Gene Hackman in this is incredibly, stunningly, unbelievably great. His character quickly becomes Cruise's mentor. He is an unhappy, alcoholic, womanizing ambulance chaser (albeit an highly powerful and prosperous one) who also cannot escape either and is the linchpin in the unfolding drama that Cruise and Tripplehorn find themselves square in the middle of. Hackman is the one you should despise and dislike right from the beginning but you can't even if you try very hard because he is a likable person and you know he is in serious trouble which makes you emphasize with him right from the get go. My favorite Grisham book adaptation it made him a household name to this very day. Also features appearances by Paul Sorvino, Gary Busey, and Holly Hunter.
23 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent lawyer thriller
cardsrock26 July 2020
Tom Cruise is as competent as ever in this Sydney Pollack-directed law film. I would put his film Three Days of the Condor ahead of this one though because the Firm lacks much of the excitement and well-plotted story beats. There are a few moments of suspense, but a lot of is it pretty slow-moving. The cast is fantastic though with several standout performances. The score, while good, felt very out of place in several scenes. This was also probably at least half an hour too long. The Firm is a slightly above average thriller from the 90s that provides a good starring role for Tom Cruise.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Caught In A Trap
seymourblack-127 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Anyone who has experienced poverty or hardship in their early life never forgets the experience and always retains a certain element of insecurity about wealth, regardless of how much financial success they later achieve. In "The Firm", it's this phenomenon that essentially drives a brilliant young law student to ignore numerous offers of career-enhancing opportunities from a number of prestigious big city law firms to, instead, join a small Memphis partnership who offer him a fantastic remuneration package. Unfortunately, what follows, perfectly illustrates the wisdom of the old adage that "if something seems too good to be true, it probably is".

Mitch McDeere (Tom Cruise) is the Harvard Law School graduate from a poor background whose exceptional academic achievements lead to him being head-hunted by "Berdini, Lambert & Locke". The firm offer him a huge salary, a low-interest mortgage, a Mercedes and the repayment of his student loans and in return, Mitch readily agrees to join them. After relocating to Memphis with his wife Abby (Jeanne Tripplehorn), he quickly settles into the practice and regularly works long hours. Initially, he's comfortable with the firm's family ethos and doesn't share Abby's unease about some of the advice she receives such as "the firm encourages children" etc. A little later, however, when he realises that a high percentage of the firm's work is related to the activities of the Mob and a couple of the firm's lawyers suddenly die in mysterious circumstances, he gets the strong feeling that something sinister is going on.

Mitch's suspicions are confirmed when he gets approached by the director of the FBI and Agent Wayne Tarrance (Ed Harris) who inform him about the firm's criminal and money-laundering activities. They want Mitch to supply them with information and documents to be used as evidence to bring his employers to justice and add that if he doesn't co-operate, things will be made very difficult for his brother who's in jail facing a manslaughter charge. They also emphasise that Mitch effectively doesn't have any choice in the matter because no partner has ever left the firm alive and if he simply decides to stay with the firm, he could face 20 years in prison when they go down, as they inevitably will.

Mitch knows it would be impossible to pass on the documents that the FBI want without breaching the confidence of his legitimate clients and taking that action would inevitably lead to the loss of his licence to practice law. He therefore realises that in order to meet their demands without losing his career, making his brother's parlous situation worse or winding up dead at the hands of his ruthless employers (or the Mob), he needs to devise an imaginative plan to get out of the trap he's in. When he then discovers that the firm have routinely been over-billing clients for some considerable time, he starts to see an opportunity to formulate just such a plan but, of course, its success is by no means guaranteed.

Based on John Grisham's bestselling novel, this glossy thriller was understandably a huge box-office success. It's intriguing, tense and highly entertaining and features a whole collection of great performances from its star-studded cast. Surprisingly though, it's Gary Busey, Gene Hackman, Ed Harris and Holly Hunter that really bring the screen to life in their relatively small parts while Tom Cruise and Jeanne Tripplehorn also do well in their starring roles.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Love the 90s vibe
idavainionpaa24 November 2020
Got to love Tom Cruise cruising his way through the Firm. Good screen play, great acting and exciting story. Don't get tired at all during these 2.5h of parallell stories of the characters and to see how they all intervene in each others lives.

Even get some action in the film toward the end. If you feel like an exciting film with all your traditional 90 vibe in style, talk and play - make sure to watch the Firm. Great job everyone!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dave Grusin did the score!
sjanders-864301 October 2021
Tom Cruise shines bright in this 1993 thriller about a Memphis law firm that hires him to work fresh out of Harvard. They pay his college debt and pay $98,000 to start. Cruise and wife Tripplehorn take their dog and move to Memphis. The music is tops. I also love the Mississippi River views and other views of Memphis. Holly Hunter grabs the spotlight when she appears for her role as secretary to the investigator who is shot. Cruise has a brother Straithern who is in jail for manslaughter. John Grisham wrote the novel on which the film is based. Seale is the cinematographer. Harris is the FBI agent.

Sydney Pollack directed. I liked the tram car scenes. The museum is interesting. There is a walkway bridge by the side of the tram car. The killer albino runs along the walkway while Cruise is in the tram car going the other way. Score is the best. The seeds of Grisham's greatness are all here in this early work.

Cruise running from the killers with Grusin score is the very best. The film made millions.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great Legal, Crime Thriller
gavin694216 December 2015
A young lawyer (Tom Cruise) joins a prestigious law firm only to discover that it has a sinister dark side.

Roger Ebert gave "The Firm" three stars out of four, remarking: "The movie is virtually an anthology of good small character performances. The large gallery of characters makes The Firm into a convincing canvas but with a screenplay that developed the story more clearly, this might have been a superior movie, instead of just a good one with some fine performances." I think Ebert is spot on here. The plot is pretty good, but never seems as strong as the characters. Every actor gives the full amount of their potential.

For me, it was a thrill to see Tobin Bell. Cruise is great, and was apparently very athletic at this point in his career -- Paul Calderon recalls that Cruise was mountain climbing on weekends. Gene Hackman is incredible, Ed Harris is pretty good... heck, even Gary Busey performs better than usual. But Bell is great to see. I do not think he really became known before "Saw", and even then only by certain people. Here, he has an excellent supporting role as a hit man.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Painful adaptation of Grisham's page-turner
mnpollio19 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
John Grisham fairly burst on the scene with the very definition of a page-turner in the legal thriller The Firm. His novel is slick, manipulative, undeniably fast-paced and suspenseful. Keep those last two terms in mind, because fast-paced and suspenseful can never be ascribed to the stillborn, ponderous mess that Sydney Pollack perpetrates on the viewer.

The storyline centers on idealistic young attorney Tom Cruise, who joins a prestigious Southern law firm that ends up having ties to organized crime and begins to take control of his life. The novel details the dawning realization and horror that the attorney and his wife face when it is discovered that they are basically owned by The Firm and their lives are in danger should they ever step out of line. The film details pretty much the same story with some rather wrong-headed derivations and devoid of any tensions or excitement.

The cast is par excellence. There is not even a minor role not inhabited by a first-rate actor. Cruise is ideally cast as the attorney. Gene Hackman is reliable as his mentor at the firm. Unfortunately, of the remaining cast, only Holly Hunter makes much of an impression as a canny private detective's secretary who ends up helping the lead couple. Jeanne Tripplehorn spends much of the film looking constipated as Cruise's wife. The film offers her a mid-way revelation that results in her spending an obscene amount of time moping on a set of swings. The various shady characters at the firm that instilled such fear and distrust in the novel are inhabited on screen by a diversity of non-threatening, retirement age actors - like Hal Holbrook. And to play the terrifying head of security and enforcer of the firm - the man that no one wants to mess with - Pollack casts Wilford Brimley - the avuncular grandfather figure from the oat bran commercials. Apparently Pollack was going for irony, but it blows up in his face. There is something to be said when Ed Harris' relatively sympathetic FBI agent comes off as more of a threat than the assassins dogging Cruise. With the likes of Holbrook and Brimley out to get him, Cruise just has to rev up to a hearty shuffle in order to avoid them.

The pace is the film's worst problem. It is stagnant from start to finish. There is literally no stretch of excitement in the entire film based on a novel that was swimming in it. Part of the issue is that Pollack seems to think the story is of biblical importance and needs to be portrayed with unflagging solemnity - in short, he is too good to stoop to a thrill. The film is tragically overlong and easily feels like triple the length it is. Anything that was remotely exciting from the novel has been removed or depicted in such a painfully tedious fashion lest one break a sweat.

Even worse, changes made in the story and the outcome in particular make no sense. The true evil of the firm was actually the organized crime syndicate that it fronted for. In the film, the organized crime syndicate is depicted as almost a neutral figure that can be won over by Cruise's reasoning and savvy, while the firm itself it depicted as the ultimate evil (HUH?). We never truly feel that Cruise and Tripplehorn are ever in any serious danger and that, coupled with the staggering pace and running time, gives us no rooting interest in the outcome. And when the outcome is as weak as it is here, one is just as happy not to wait around for it.

The score sounds like low-rent jazz and often detracts even further from the "action".

This production is a veritable textbook on how not to adapt a popular page-turner. A lumbering, tortuous, joyless mess devoid of tension, suspense, excitement or any recognizable human emotion. Even the most undiscerning viewers will find themselves looking at their watches and tapping their feet prior to the halfway mark. A complete misfire and a total dud - this film is indeed painful.
42 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed