User Reviews (71)

Add a Review

  • jotix10013 October 2006
    Warning: Spoilers
    John McNaughton, the director of "Mad Dog and Glory", has been associated with other, more violent, pictures. In this film he shows a restraint no one would have predicted.

    The story centers around Wayne, a shy detective in the Chicago Police, who is instrumental for saving the life of a mafioso, Frank Milo. To show his gratitude, Frank sends one of his body guards to invite Wayne to the stand club he owns. A comic mafioso? Well, Frank's humor is not for everyone, including Wayne, who seems ill at ease. It's obvious Wayne doesn't want to be thanked for his good deed.

    To make matters worse, the following day he receives a visit from the young woman who almost burned him at the club with hot coffee. Glory, it turns out, owes Frank Milo big time. She is paying for her brother's debt and Frank makes her go do nice to Wayne. At the start, it's clear Wayne is a man that has been out of practice, not being with a woman in quite some time. Glory, a beautiful woman, makes Wayne get back on track as he begins falling in love.

    Frank Milo has other thing in mind. His generosity has limits, and he comes to collect Glory. He realizes how much Wayne has fallen for the young woman so he names a figure for taking possession of Glory, but Wayne doesn't have the money. They end up in a fight, but peace is restored with a forgiving Frank.

    Robert DeNiro makes a strange appearance underplaying Wayne's role. He looks different, not as tall as he normally looks. Bill Murray who plays Frank Milo, gives another of his effortless performances. Uma Thurman is Glory, the beautiful woman that catches Wayne's heart. Others in the cast include, among others, David Caruso and Kathy Baker.

    "Mad Dog and Glory" is a different kind of gangster movie directed with sure hand by John McNaughton.
  • Most things in Mad Dog and Glory work. The film uses humour, a love story, cross casting and a scrape of suspense well and at various different intervals. What doesn't work are the overall frustrations that bog the film down. The premise is so simple, watching it might make you think you've seen it a hundred times before but that doesn't detract too much. De Niro plays a role that I hadn't seen him play before and must admit, I didn't think he had it in him following other such performances like Taxi Driver, Raging Bull and Ronin where he played various different roles with various different aims. Here he pulls off the nervous, shy photographer whom just goes about his business and although it takes some getting used to, it's a pleasant surprise.

    He can be contrasted with Bill Murray's character of Frank Milo who is a criminal/mob boss that is saved by De Niro's character following a gun point robbery. What's clever about this fact is that Murray is playing the character De Niro normally plays and vice-versa. Throughout the film, the script is consistent. Mad Dog (De Niro) gets to confess some jokes to Milo since he also works as a stand up comic; something we're more familiar to Bill Murray doing, and the awkward exchanges between Mad Dog and Glory (Thurman) also evoke some emotions.

    Uma Thurman is just about 'put-upable' in this film. Her character is right on that fine-line you get that separates 'likeable' and 'annoying' in a very distinct way. Once more, the overall treatment of the female characters also stands out in a rather obvious way. At the bars, it's all women who run around serving the men who sit there and enjoy themselves; the character of Glory, as I've said, has a dopey, annoying voice and is someone whom is to phone Milo on instructions. Glory isn't very smart either and when, nearer the end in a heated exchange between Mad Dog and Milo, Milo yells 'You love her? I OWN her!' it's really made to seem like the screenwriter has something against the female side of our species.

    Although the film is pretty much consistent throughout in its subject matter with Mad Dog and Glory spending enough time with one another to begin to like each other, Frank Milo remaining a constant, background friend and foe alike; it falters towards the end when certain characters try to raise money and the ending is such a horrible, happy, un-realistic ending – it actually leaves a bad taste in the mouth when the feeling should be very different. Sure, I was happy for the characters involved but it was too generic. Reading up on it, I found that there were two endings meaning that even the makers were undecided.

    Regarding Uma Thurman, this is a film of hers I feel I never would have seen had it not been for some dedicated searching and I was certainly very surprised when the sex scenes with De Niro came along since I'd always assumed she'd done Dangerous Liasons in 1988 and then nothing until 1994's Pulp Fiction which then, kick-started what was a series of successful, well known films. The reason for my surprise is that I never hear anyone mention this film as one of either Thurman's or De Niro's best. It's true that it's far from great but the sheer surprise at realising both had done this film in their careers is enough to realise and to respect the acting talent involved. From now on, when people speak of Uma Thurman or Robert De Niro, this is a film of their's I will bring up and probably recommend.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    When renting out DVD's from my local library during the Christmas period, (due to them letting you keep them for 3 weeks,instead of the normal 1 week) I have always intensionally kept away from renting Mad Dog & Glory,due to the movie sounding extremely dry.

    Taking a look recently at IMDb's list of movies that came out in 1993,due to deciding that I would take part in a poll being held on IMDb's Classic Film board for the best films of 1993,I was surprised to discover,that along with Groundhog Day being brought out in 1993,that Mad Dog and Glory had also been released in the same year.Pushing my doubts over the title being "dry",I decided to finally have a look at the movie,to discover how mad Mad Dog really is.

    The plot:

    Investigating a recent gang-land shooting with his close friend,and fellow Police Officer Mike,Officer Wayne "Mad Dog" Dobie decides to take a short break from the crime scene, (so that he can make sense of how he suspects the shooting took place) and go to a near by local shop to pick up a snack.

    Entering the shop,Dobie discovers an armed robber,who after shooting the store's owner,is now holding a customer hostage.Nagoiating with the robber,Wayne allows for the thief to run free,as he drags the still alive costumer to safety.Expecting to get thanked for saving his life,Mad dog is instead left in a daze,when the customer kindly tells him that he is a disgrace to the police force.

    The next day:

    Reluctantly accepting an offer from his fellow officers to go to a Comedy club,Dobie is surprised to discover that the ungrateful customer who he saved,is actually a stand up comedian called Frank Milo,whose jokes cause Wayne's fellow officer's to row in the aisles.Meeting up with Milo after his performance,Frank tells Mad Dog that he is sorry for how nasty he had talked to him,mere minutes after his life had been saved,and that to make it up to Dobie,he is going to become his best friend,and give him a night on the town that he will never forget.

    Enjoying every moment of Frank's generosity (which includes being introduced to a dizzy,but very cute girl called Glory")Mad Dog begins to fear that his new "best friend" may be up to something more darker than just delivering his Black Comedy punchlines,when the robber who held Milo hostage at the convenience store is finally located,dead in a dustbin.

    View on the film:

    Setting the movie literally alight in the first scene,by using the flicking of a cigarette lighter to take the movie from a black and white Film Noir appearance,to being a darkly-neon lit, Neo-Noir world.Director John McNaughton and cinematography Robby Muller prominently use a dusty yellow filter for a number of scenes,which helps to create a deeply murky atmosphere of Milo's back street ally gangster life blending in,and corrupting Dobie's straight-lace police force.Along with the terrific use of the yellow filter,McNaughton also shows a superb eye for complex camera moves,which McNaughton expertly uses to show the change in Glory's and "Mad Dog's" relationship,which goes from nervous and stilted to flamboyant and complex.

    Taking on a different role to the one that the studio originally wanted him to take (Milo),Robert De Niro gives a strong,off-beat performance as Wayne "Mad Dog" Dobie,with De Niro always making sure that the situation that Wayne finds himself in is never joked upon,but instead allowing for the Black Comedy element to really enter the movie,by showing that no matter how "Mad" he tries to make himself look,Wayne is not able to get rid of the goofy smile that goes across his face,as he finds himself failing upwards in Dobie's attempt to not back down from the powerful Milo.

    Contrasting De Niro's performance perfectly,Bill Murray unveils a wonderful sternness as Frank Milo,which along with giving his very good one-liners extra spikes,also makes Milo a surprisingly ruthless character,with Murray showing Frank to take people either as his "best friends",or as his enemies.Placed right in the middle of Milo and Dobie,the beautiful Uma Thurman (who also appears topless in the film) compliments Murray's seriousness and De Nero's goofiness by showing Glory's nerves to be torn up by the Neo-Noir world that she has been living in with Frank,with Thurman showing that Glory's main dream is to leave the darkness behind,and enter Frank's kooky and goofy world.

    Being sadly changed by the studio, that led to the release of the movie being delayed for a year,the dark screenplay by Richard Price mixes a dark and vicious Neo-Noir with sharp and brittle Black Comedy one liners,that are disappointingly not allowed to show there full set of teeth due to the replacement ending being uncomfortably cheerful,and also due to Frank Milo weirdly disappearing for half the movie,which leads to this being a Neo-Noir whose bite is not worse than its bark.
  • Time and time again I try to see movie comedy try to transcend its material to create some sort of comic lunacy. They take all their characters and exagerate them to the point of being caricatures instead. MAD DOG & GLORY could very well have done that to Milo, Glory and Wayne. But instead of making a mockery out of their world for simple laughs and guffaws, director McNaughton plays the comedy at human level, in turn making this little gem something different. Every project John McNaughton takes on seems to be effectively low-keyed. He made HENRY one of the most frightening and violent films of the 90's by playing down the glorification of violence. He did it this time with the comedic material in MAD DOG & GLORY, making us laugh with its characters, and not at them. As for the acting? Impeccable.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Up to the point when I saw MAD DOG AND GLORY, I had only seen 4 John McNaughton-movies. WILD THINGS and NORMAL LIFE were two very decent crime/drama/thriller-movies which I both liked a lot. The ones which I probably enjoyed the most were the dark & obscure HENRY: PORTRAIT OF A SERIAL KILLER and the fun horrorfest THE BORROWER. The last two, however, suffered a bit from lack of decent pacing, probably caused by a screenplay ignoring the conventional rules of writing. This clearly being symptoms of McNaughton's earlier work, MAD DOG AND GLORY also suffers a bit from it. But I will most certainly not hold it against him because it helps create that off-beat feeling you can find in his earlier work. That being said, there is absolutely nothing wrong with MAD DOG AND GLORY, except for one little disappointment (I'll come to that later).

    The story is interesting and, considering the cast, sounds very promising. Robert De Niro plays Wayne'Mad Dog'Dobie, a rather timid cop/crime-photographer who isn't to keen on pulling his gun. One day, when walking into a nightshop he saves the life of gangster/stand-up comedian Frank Milo (Bill Murray). As a thank-you-gift Frank offers Glory (Uma Thurman) to Wayne. She can be his girlfriend for one week. As one might predict, the two will fall in love before the week is over.

    Technically, you could describe this movie as a romantic comedy (with a touch of crime & drama). And though it's not my favorite genre, I can only appreciate a man like McNaughton giving a shot at it. And he pulls it off well, but not without giving it that touch of his. For instance, the opening-scene is very violent for this type of film, the sex-scene rather explicit (Uma Thurman goes surprisingly nude in that scene) and the dialogues are NOT too sugary or buttery. So, extra points for ignoring the romantic comedy-clichés as well as for casting De Niro and Murray against type.

    The acting is, as you can expect, very good, but unfortunately real fireworks between the actors never happen (that's the little disappointment I mentioned). Nevertheless, it's always fun seeing De Niro and Murray do their thing and they certainly do have their moments in this movie. Especially Murray (just watch the introduction of his character). The ending is not your clearly defined 'happy-end' and the final confrontation between De Niro and Murray is different then you'd expect and over before you know it. That may not sound so good, but believe me, it works (as a result of the off-beat pacing of the screenplay). David Caruso's performance is also 'très naturel' and he seems comfortable as De Niro's helping friend. Caruso's fight with Mike Starr is one of the highlights of the movie.

    So, in the end we have a well-acted enjoyable comedy/drama with touches of the sweet and the violent. Whether you like it or not, you can not ignore the fact that it dares to be different on some levels. For me it's clear: I'm off to see the other John McNaughton-movies I haven't seen yet.
  • ...but why?

    My first guess would be...Uma Thurman. She's one of the most beautiful and talented actresses, that gives a special touch to a romantic movies.

    Second guess? Always good Robert DeNiro, nice romantic story and some laughable moments.

    All in all, this is one of the movies, which won't make a big change in the history of cinematography, but because of a special love story and Uma, will always have a special place in my heart. That's why a

    7 out of 10
  • I suppose the best thing about this movie is Robert De Niro and Bill Murray both playing against type, and doing so very well. Uma Thurman was good also, looking very pretty even when also looking a bit mousy. I have never been a fan of David Caruso, but once you get past the fact that it is David Caruso, you can't help but enjoy the way he played his part. Long time character actor Mike Starr was sufficiently menacing while also showing a bit of a goofy side. Some people complained about this film being placed in the comedy genre, and that seems legitimate, but it is a film rather hard to characterize. You might call it a character study. It had amusing and wry moments, but it is hardly a comedy. Anyway it is an OK film, worth a look.
  • rps-218 March 2004
    This film, starts as a routine cops and robbers shoot-em up, quickly turns into something quite different (and quite amusing) but then fails to go anywhere. The plot is intriguing enough that you expect a twist, a surprise, a hook at the end. But no. It concludes with a whimper and not a bang. However Bill Murray is always fun and Robert De Niro is always good (although Uma Thurman's performance pales against those of her two male co-stars.) Having said all that, it's entertaining enough. I even added a couple of jokes from the film, one of them told by DeNiro, to my repetoire. ("My wife thinks that fondling and cooking are cities in China." Not bad.) There also is some snappy dialogue. I was pondering a six or seven as I watched it but the wimpish ending knocked that back to a five.
  • Imagine three American cops all sleeping, some on the floor of the police station, when they are woken up by a telephone call about a homicide. For a change a Hollywood film appears to be real, unusually real.

    A few minutes into the film and you see the cop-cum-photographer letting a murderer slip away just to save another man's life. You sit up. How many cops do that? This script is not the usual stuff.

    Some minutes later, you are shown the cop picking up newspapers for his neighbors and placing them outside their doors. What's more, when a lonely female neighbour offers him a possible sexual tryst for free, he refuses. and he doesn't have a wife or a regular girlfriend. This is the same man, who obliged a cop's taunt for a group photograph of the crowd near the homicide spot. But the director never obliges the viewer who is wondering why the cop took that "group" photograph.

    The character of Mad Dog is not the only one richly developed by the intelligent script. Those of Glory and Fran Milo also develop as the film progresses--only Thurman's Glory almost overshadows De Niro's Mad Dog. The script, Thurman and De Niro raise the level of the film above the ordinary, while you wonder why the director began with the senseless gory killings, why the director had the "group" photograph taken, and why sequence of De Niro dancing to a juke box was necessary.

    The film attempts to flesh out several colorful characters and as character studies the film is definitely good entertainment and value for money--while the overall structure of the film will disappoint you. Now in Europe the film would be accepted but I will be surprised if the average American will love this inward looking film that leaves much to be desired on the technical front.
  • The main attraction of this film is the opportunity to watch two outstanding, idiosyncratic actors, originals with a host of inferior imitators, but from totally different traditions, and varying styles and histories, playing off each other. In this respect, its nearest relative is the 1964 comedy 'Bedtime Story', which pitted the anguished master of American Method, Marlon Brando, against suave British comedian, David Niven.

    The attraction is less in the exercise of skill than the clash, the promise of sparks, of colliding visions of what it is to be an actor. This requires a thorough awareness of the actor's persona and a steady dismantling of it. 'Glory' would seem to be far removed from De Niro's normal territory - it is set in the criminal milieu, yes, but he is a cop. Not only that, but his habitual volatility is replaced by a shyness and reluctance that is not so far from cowardice.

    On the other hand, like Travis Bickle, Mad Dog is an alienated loner in the big city, confronted in the course of his daily work with random horror. And although he seems quite sweet, there is a menace in those familiar mannerisms that bespeak a mortified pride that can only take so much, that will finally erupt in primal, la Motta-like violence. When this point comes, however, it's not quite what we expect. Well, I certainly didn't expect to see Bill Murray kicking De Niro in front of friends and gangsters like he was a pestering, rather than mad, dog. And Mad Dog's violence is only the last straw after his characteristic humiliating obsequiousness doesn't get the required result, and to which he is eager to return rather than face more kicking. It is a violence that has none of the warped grace of Bickle, being more the gallumphing ineptness of an inebriate. That de Niro manages to make this potentially ridiculous character sympathetic is a tribute to his talent. He can't make him very interesting though.

    Although de Niro, like Brando, is the 'great' 'actor' in this concept, it is the frustratingly fleeting glimpses of Murray we crave. His stand-up comic/gangster loan shark/ slave trader is an extraordinary creation, a conception of pure evil on the level of Kurtz, flattened out by amiable amorality and style until it becomes nothing, neither friend nor foe, neurotic nor bosom buddy; a terrifying unpredictability normalised by unruffled banality.

    it's a shame, therefore, that the film doesn't really work. One problem is the script, which doesn't really do anything, and subverts the old Hawksian narrative of childlike hero/coward and making him a man, without really putting anything in its place. The most serious gap, however, is the 'neutrality' effecting character, plot, direction - where 'Bedtime Story''s scientific equation created chemical sparks, driven by immorality; Murray and de NIro's conflict is neutered by amorality.

    The role of Thurman suffers in this, and is almost irrelevant; similarly the frightening violence of the opening ten minutes is cancelled out by the following comedy-gangster tone which never hits the right note, although the scene where Mad Dog finally loses his virginity and plays along to Louis Prima at the scene of a murder is priceless. MacNaughton's usual themes of voyeurism and surveillance - Mad Dog is a police photographer who peeps at the lovers across the yard - are ineffectively developed. The whole thing feels like one of those synthetic neo-noirs made on the 'Fallen Angels' TV programme.
  • Kiwi-73 August 2001
    A terrifically good little film with a slick and funny script, consummate actors allowed to strut their stuff, a tight edit, and a wonderful sort of black humour that had me laughing out loud. Yes, it's fairly predictable, but I didn't mind knowing where it was heading because it was so much fun getting there.

    That said, it's not a film for everyone. It's sort of a "Pretty Woman" meets "Fargo". If that combination doesn't appeal, then this film probably won't either. But I thought it was a real gem. Two big thumbs up.
  • A surprisingly strong script and solid acting performances saved what could have been a mediocre story involving cliché stock characters. As it turns out, the movie features a sensitive portrayal of a wanderlust cop, his wirey and scrappy colleague, an off-key loan shark, and a vulnerable girl. Each of the characters was subtly amusing and unique-- but not framed to be cartoonish. If the script had attempted to go in for more jokes, the movie would have suffered-- how many movies involve a disgruntled cop and a mob guy who sees a shrink? Too many... Many that often rely on overplayed cliché and slapstick to deliver. Or they go in for the melo-drama. Instead, the film just hopped along, taking the quirky story seriously, producing a film that is neither screamingly funny nor powerfully dramatic but instead small, light, and mildly interesting. Picture a just slightly-darker Mickey Blue Eyes, with a happier ending, a more interesting set of characters, and less humor.
  • Here again, here's a movie I liked the first time and discarded after the second viewing. It just lost its appeal. Part of that appeal was Uma Thurman, who can be awesome-looking at times (and the opposite at other times!). But, add Robert De Niro and Bill Murray and that's quite a threesome.

    This story is a bit quirky thanks in large to Murray who plays a unique character: a very strange kind of mobster. The story was intriguing the first time but its bad points overwhelmed at me on the second viewing, enough that wouldn't watch this again.

    What bad points? Well, I didn't like were three things:De Niro with the age-old-only-in Hollywood line "I love you" to Thurman even though he'd only known her for less than two days; a cheap shot against policeman where they show the cop next door as a cowardly wife-beater; and mainly just too much of a nasty meanness to this movie. Afterward, when I saw that Martin Scorcese co-directed and produced this film, that explained my last complaint. Sometimes ("Casino," for example, he overdoes the nasty stuff.)
  • Mad Dog and Glory (1993)

    **** (out of 4)

    A lonely and wimpy cop (Robert DeNiro) saves the life of a mobster (Bill Murray) so as a thank you gift the mobster gives the cop a thank you present for a week in the form of Glory (Uma Thurman). The two eventually fall in love but since she's still the gangster girl there's going to be a problem with the cop trying to keep her. I still remember when this film was released as it got all sorts of very good reviews but it didn't really catch an audience, which is a real shame but the bigger shame is that it still hasn't become too well known even after fifteen years. To me this is one of the best comedies of the decade and a film that gets better with each new viewing. What makes this comedy so special is that we get two great actors changing their roles and playing the opposite of what we're use to seeing them do. I also think this is one of DeNiro's greatest performance just because of how fun he is here. We're use to seeing him play dark and tormented characters so it's great fun seeing him at the opposite end of the pole and playing a real wimp who really can't do anything right. Murray is downright wonderful in the role of the mobster who wants to be a comic. Murray's comic timing hits all the right notes and he even manages to come off threatening in the scenes where he has to try and rough up DeNiro. Thurman is easy on the eyes and comes off very well. Supporting players David Caruso, Mike Starr, Kathy Baker and Tom Towles also shine in their moments. Starr isn't very well known but he's always been one of my favorite character actors and his brand of comedy adds a lot of great scenes to the film. All of the comedy leads to a wonderful street fight at the end when DeNiro finally snaps and becomes the "Mad Dog", which is a hilarious sequence and in my opinion one of the best street fights in any movie. After seeing DeNiro's character being bullied the entire film, to finally see him snap was very exciting and funny.
  • sol-kay31 March 2006
    ***SPOILERS*** Off-beat love story about a Chicago Police photographer getting involved with a mobsters woman who's life he just saved. Wayne "Mad Dog" Dobie, Robert De Niro, is on the scene of a double-murder when he decides to go to a nearby bodega to get a bite to eat. It's there that he notices that the counter boy, Derek Annuniation, is really a stick-up man with the bodega owner shot dead and a customer on the floor with a gun to his head.

    Wayne the "Mad Dog" talking the hoodlum into just walking away, since there's dozens of cops swarming all around the neighborhood, takes takes his advice and scoots out of the place. Later at the local bar where Wayne is having a few drinks with his fellow police photographer Mike, David Caruso, he's approached by this big soft-spoken hood Harold, Mike Starr. Harold asks Wayne to go to the Comic-Cazie club, free of charge and even have a drink on the house,to see his boss who says he owes Wayne a favor.

    Wayne not at first interested to go to the Comic-Cazie nightclub changes his mind and finds to his surprise that the star attraction there is stand-up comedian Frank Milo, Bill Murray, the person who's life he saved at the bodega! Not only that but that Frank is also the owner of the club and a big-time Chicago hoodlum who specializes in lone sharking. Frank is so appreciative of Wayne's cool-handedness that kept him from getting his brains blown out that he sends him this, the best word I can find to describe her, geisha girl who he calls Glory,Uma Thurman,to live at his apartment and fulfill his wildest fantasies for a week as a gift of his gratitude.

    Glory just happened to be a bartender at the Comic-Cazie the night Wayne went there to see the show and accidentally burned him by spilling a pitcher of hot coffee on his hand which wasn't exactly the best way the meet his future "salve-girl". As Glory opens up about her involvement with Frank whom she's indebted to in order to save her brother, who owes Frank some $70,000.00, from ending up in the bottom of Lake Michigan Wayne starts to slowly fall in love with her. Wayne gets so hooked on Glory where he refuses to return her back to Frank after her weeks stay with him and even goes so far to try buy her back from him. Wayne also became very disturbed after he got to shack up with Glory when the robber/murderer of the bodega was later found shot and killed and dumped in a garbage can. Which had all the earmarks of a mob hit engineered by non-other then his new friend and benefactor Frank Milo.

    Making up his mind not to return Glory back to Frank, and a life of slavery, leads to Wayne being marked for either a beating or even getting whacked by the Milo Mob. This brings the very best out of Wayne turning the meek and introverted "Mad Dog" into a fearless and unflinching tiger. Who not only takes on Frank Milo and his gang but inspires his fellow police friends, who he in the end Wayne really didn't need, to come to his aid.

    The movie just grows on you even though you have trouble at first accepting it's premise "The Cop and the Salve Girl". The top-notch acting by all involved, especially Robert De Niro, makes you easily overlook all of the films "Mad Dog and Glory" faults and inconsistencies and just sit back and enjoy it.
  • halopes24 November 2003
    Contrary to what you might expect from a picture from the director of Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (John MacNaughton), producer Martin Scorsese and Academy Award Winner Robert De Niro, Mad Dog and Glory is not a violent movie neither a crime epic; in fact, it's an odd, strange, love story.

    The `ruthless' mobster here is comic actor Bill Murray and De Niro plays the sweet, shy, repressed cop, uncomfortably dealing with in nature sensual Uma Thurman. I'm a huge De Niro fan and I also love the sarcastic Bill Murray. Mad Dog and Glory is sustained by this cold connection between the two actors, which appear to be playing reverse roles, but manage to be incredible believable and surprising as individual characters. Uma Thurman is charming as the girl in debt to the small-time crime boss and David Caruso delivers a solid, contained, performance.

    There's a pacing problem in the script filled with wonderful dialogue, but if Mad Dog and Glory clearly fails to fit in the crime genre for its obvious reasons, it also does not totally success as a character driven comedy/drama because there's a lack of chemistry between the three main actors. I mean, De Niro plays a shy, introverted police photographer; Murray is sarcastic as always, funny but distant, and Thurman is in the middle of both, kind of lost.

    I liked Mad Dog and Glory though it's not a magical movie; it's simply an odd love story, sometimes funny, always cold. It's a movie which has some common ingredients but manages to do something different.
  • This is one of those films that pretty much defies genre or category, inasmuch as it falls into any and all from which you may want to choose. So pick a label and stick it on; whichever you decide upon will work, because `Mad Dog and Glory,' directed by John McNaughton, is going to be received and interpreted differently by all who see it, and that determination will be directly derived from personal experience and frame of reference. There are those who will find this film hilarious, while others will see it as a somewhat disconcerting drama, and it's all subjective; there is no right or wrong to it. And in the end, it really won't make any difference, as this is decidedly not a film to compel one toward contemplation once it's over, and for the simple reason that this is basically a character study of characters it's hard to care about. Which pretty much negates any `mulling over' one typically may be wont to engage upon following a film. Suffice to say, this one's a mixed bag; it definitely has it's moments (of course, that's a `given'-- this is, after all, a `De Niro,') and it's entertaining to a point. But in the final analysis, once the screen goes dark, there isn't much about it you're apt to remember once the sun and moon have changed places overhead.

    Wayne Dobie (Robert De Niro) is a veteran Chicago P.D. detective, but be advised, he is no `Dirty Harry.' His specialty is taking photographs of crime scenes, and he has not, in fact, drawn his gun in fifteen years. His life is mundane, he lives alone and he is satisfied if not content with his chosen career. He's a clean cop who lives a clean life and makes the most of what he has. But virtually overnight all of that changes when Wayne inadvertently does a solid for a guy named Frank Milo (Bill Murray).

    Milo is a small time hood, a loan shark, who fancies himself a `mob boss,' and though he has achieved some success in his `field,' he suffers from delusions of grandeur that have made him more of a legend in his own mind than anything else. And he manifests that fantasy by having box seats for Sox games and owning his own comedy club where he features himself doing stand-up: Frank Milo, gangster/comedian. And when he finds himself indebted to Wayne, he tells him through the largess of his ego that he can be the `expediter of your dreams,' and proceeds to send his new detective friend a `present.' It's a gift, however, that puts Wayne in something of a compromising position. Frank Milo, though, is not a man to take `no' for an answer. So for Wayne, a guy just trying to get on with his life, it's a dilemma; and because of the peculiar circumstances involved, it's one to which there is no easy solution. Still, it's not going to go away on it's own, so Wayne is going to have to figure it out. And soon.

    Director McNaughton was obviously challenged by this screenplay by Richard Price, and like his main character, Wayne, it apparently became something of a dilemma for him. In his defense, it must be said that it's understandable, as this is an example of a high concept idea that looks good on paper, but needs some real vision to successfully translate it to the screen. And that's where McNaughton comes up short. He just couldn't find the hook, that special something that would've made it all jell, and quite frankly, except for the actors involved, this one would've had a shelf life of about a minute-and-a-half. While the outcome of the whole business isn't necessarily predictable (right down to the wire there's a couple of ways it can go), much of what happens is inevitable, like the showdown between Wayne and Milo. Getting there, meanwhile, is a journey nearly as boring as Wayne's life.

    One of the premiere actors in the history of the cinema, Robert De Niro has the ability to get into a character's skin like no one else, and his portrayal of Wayne is certainly no exception. That De Niro can add nuance to such a nondescript character is a true affirmation of his talent. Wayne is something of a study in contradiction; on a deeper level, he's an extremely conflicted individual-- he has the heart of an artist, but his primary need is the security his job as a cop affords him. All of which De Niro conveys impeccably. Still, there's nothing unusual about Wayne or his situation. Take a poll of the people of the world and you'll find that MOST of them want to be one thing, but make their living doing something else. Add to that the fact that, while Wayne is likable enough, there's nothing about him that's going to evoke much empathy or make you sympathize with him. In the grand scheme of things, his problems are simply too insignificant to get worked up about. And it must be noted that it points up what a brilliant performance this is from De Niro; his Wayne is exactly who he's supposed to be, and it's hard to be interested in a guy who is basically uninteresting and common.

    As for Murray, playing Milo stone-faced and straight cannot alter the fact that Murray is an intrinsically funny guy. Initially, casting him in this role seems almost inspired, and he gives a good enough performance; but this character hangs on him like a bad suit. He has his moments, but the bottom line is, if it doesn't fit, it doesn't fit, and the best tailor in the world couldn't have helped him.

    In supporting roles, there are some noteworthy performances turned in by David Caruso (Mike), Uma Thurman (Glory), Mike Starr (Harold) and Kathy Baker (Lee), but it's not enough to make `Mad Dog and Glory' memorable cinema. 6/10.
  • Yes, I admit it. I only watched this flick to see Uma Thurman. Any chance I get to spend some time with her is well worth it, and she certainly did not disappoint here.

    I have to admit that Bill Murray gave a very good performance. He just seems to float through his roles with ease. I'm sure he works hard at it, but he makes it look so easy.

    David Caruso was also good and I admit that I have a certain fondness for him. I think he gets criticized unfairly.

    All in all a film that was OK, but not great. It was, as I said, a chance to revel in Uma's beauty for a while.
  • MAD DOG AND GLORY sums up with what's been wrong with Hollywood for many years - It tries and makes cross genre movies that appeal to everyone

    Robert DeNiro plays Wayne Dobie a cop who's too affable for his own good and who'd rather be a photographer . What he's a cop in a big city and after so many years it's just now struck him he'd rather be doing something else ! I was also curious ( Apart from giving the movie a snappy name ) why he goes by the name " Mad Dog " if he's so mild mannered ?

    The reason for this might have been explained on screen but I had a problem trying to keep up with it as it kept switching genres . The opening sequence screams that it's going to be a violent - Very violent - urban thriller , there's bits after this that hints it might be a farcical comedy and then the movie settles down into a rom com . The producers ( One of whom is Martin Scorsese ) might think they're making a movie for everyone but I promise if you like one aspect of how the movie plays out you'll also be very irritated by the other aspects and when you make a movie with something for everyone you're in serious danger of making a movie with something for no one
  • SnoopyStyle24 July 2015
    Wayne 'Mad Dog' Dobie (Robert De Niro) is a lonely crime scene investigator with his partner Mike (David Caruso). He likes his neighbor Lee (Kathy Baker) but she is abused by her police boyfriend. One night, he rescues Frank 'The Money Store' Milo (Bill Murray) from being held hostage in a convenience store robbery. Frank turns out to be a mob boss and sends barmaid Glory (Uma Thurman) to be his companion for a week. Frank also sends Harold (Mike Starr) to watch over them.

    Bill Murray and Robert De Niro are switching roles in this. It's a bit quirky to have Murray as the mob boss while De Niro is the romantic lead. This is a lot light quirky but no big laughs. Uma Thurman is endearing. The relationship is charming. It has some darker tones but it never gets too dark. It's an odd rom-com but it does work on a certain level.
  • gordsracing17 May 2003
    I watched this with a good friend of mine. The acting and the characters were sound. The cast is loaded with proven talent. But these do not make up for pedestrian script writing.

    The whole movie became cliché loaded upon common cliché in an endless pause of predictable moments and plot setups. Not a single surprise to define the work. In my buddies words, "Has anything happened yet?".
  • If you don't like movies that are adequately summarized in a 20 second spot, if you do like to see actors work against stereotypical expectations and do it well, if you don't believe people or endings are all good or all bad and you're OK with that, this might be a movie you will want to add to your collection. DeNiro is doing the expected only in that he is practicing his patented shape shifting technique -- I found his characterization both believable and involving. Murray gives his first great serious performance -- who knew he could be menacing? Uma is hard to figure, in the way conflicted people often really are. David Caruso gives the most out-there performance I have seen from him, and in this movie it works. (I didn't know him in his first TV cop series, but this character is nothing like the one he plays in CSI Miami.) You might even find yourself rethinking what really happened, and liking that, too.
  • We used to be watch a powerful De Niro, Mobster, Gangster, tough and untamed Cop, anyway a badass character, although he has a nickname of Mad Dog which he doesn't it justice in this picture, actually Wayne is quite friendly official photographer cop at forensic police, also slight fainthearted guy, quiet and methodic, shy with mature women, living alone, just few friends, quite opposite for De Niro trademark.

    One night saves the bleak mobster guy Frank Millo (Bill Murray) in an assault at store, thereafter he was invited by Millo to his private club for a chat, even faltering he decides to go, sadly the clumsy waitress Glory (Uma Thurman) when serving a hot coffee accidently burns your hand, under false pretenses Millo send the own girl Glory "to take care" of him for one week, as honest cop that keeps its honor unbending, Wayne refuses, though Glory asking for stays, due she owes favors to crook Millo as she explains, if she returns right away the chastisement will be worst, therefore he accepts with strings attached, any sexual favors at behest of Milo.

    Wayne already awares that the handler Millo wants his friendship "to Buy" a little favours here and there when will be in trouble, due he is a crook loan shark with obscure customers, who sell their soul to get some money, as said Glory "looking for the poisoned Millo is something like tries cure alcoholism with strong dosage of cocaine", nonetheless Wayne and Glory ends breaking the own rules getting involvement each other, thus the weak cop has to face the heartless Millo.

    The comic Bill Murray is fantastic as rotten villain, everything he does hoping advantages in returns, no exceptions, Wayne wanna keeps Glory there, Millo agree whilst he could pay mere 40.000 bucks for its leeway, fabulous picture that passed beat, aside the three leading roles also has David Caruso as tough cop and Mike Starr as heavy bodyguard, they have a special quarrel since the beginning, actually a sub plot, the final is highly unexpected, deserves a second chance!!

    Thanks for reading.

    Resume:

    First watch: 2021 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 7.5
  • Comcast cable lists this movie as a comedy. IMDb lists it as comedy/drama. I found no comic moments in it. Yes, the Bill Murray character attempts some stand-up comedy. But his jokes are flat and his delivery too.

    It also fails as a drama because we really get no explanation for the behavior of the characters. How did the police crime scene photographer (De Niro) earn the nickname "mad dog"? Is it normal for crime scene photographers to carry weapons and to interact socially with detectives? Why does the mob boss (Bill Murray) attempt to do night club comedy? Why does the mob boss' henchman take his scotch with milk? What's with the mob boss taking advice from a psychotherapist? There are a couple of slug fest scenes between cops and the mob, with kicks to the ribs when someone is down, heads bumped into walls, etc. Yet injuries are only superficial, no broken bones or concussions, just a few cuts.
An error has occured. Please try again.