User Reviews (132)

Add a Review

  • I really enjoyed this. A subversive fantasy, kind of set in the real world of curious and questionable adults.

    I think I was the same age as Elijah Wood when he starred in this movie, and I think I recall seeing the world something like this, albeit minus the American satire. What we don't know and imagine about adults when we're kids is both wonderful and terrible. North captures this quality well. I also was questioning of my parents and this movie struck a chord.

    This is also the only film you'll likely see Bruce Willis in a pink bunny rabbit costume. If you like wonder and anarchy you may like North.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I saw this movie just yesterday on the Encore family channel and I thought it was kind of funny. Not the best movie I've ever seen certainly, but not the absolute worst as everyone seems to be saying.

    So it turns out that in the end it's all a dream, so what? You really felt cheated by this revelation? You couldn't figure it out for yourself? I knew what it was all along.

    I was a little disappointed that every set of parents didn't include a big musical number like the ones from Texas; I think Mr. Reiner set us up on that one and then let us all down.

    I have to admit I fell asleep at one point and missed the Amish parents, but I wasn't offended by any stereotypes when it came to the other parents.

    Okay, so the Hawaiian Tropic thing was a little tasteless and I don't care much for hearing cusswords come out of the mouths of children, but other than that I thought there were some very funny bits here and there and enjoyed seeing some actors who do mostly serious grown-up parts do a bit of light comedy and family-oriented entertainment.

    When you get right down to it, the storyline of this film was really no different than The Wizard of Oz, where a child goes looking for something better than what s/he has, only to find s/he had the best there was all along, right in his/her own home.

    The rest of you need to lighten up. Save your hated for "The Bluebird".
  • When "North" came out, it got a scathing review in Portland's newspaper The Oregonian (I found this out several years later, as I didn't know about the movie's release at the time), and Siskel & Ebert named it the worst movie of 1994 (I knew about this at the time). Even the previous reviewer on IMDb.com called it the worst movie ever.

    When I saw it a few months after Siskel & Ebert named it the worst flick of 1994, I couldn't understand why people blasted it so. Granted, it wasn't a masterpiece by any stretch - we expect really good movies from a director like Rob Reiner - but it was interesting if absolutely nothing else. Featuring the title character (Elijah Wood) getting a divorce from his parents and traveling the world looking for new ones, I guess that it was little more than a way to pass time. Perhaps "North" had little more to show for itself than a giant cast: Bruce Willis, Jason Alexander, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Dan Aykroyd, Graham Greene, Kathy Bates, Alan Arkin, and even a very young Scarlett Johansson. But when you get right down to it, a giant cast isn't any kind of crime. Like I said, I found the movie interesting if nothing else.

    And to the reviewer who called this the worst movie ever, I say this: you don't know the worst movie ever until you've seen the dreadfully boring "Baryshnya-Krestyanka", which I saw while in St. Petersburg, Russia, last semester. If in fact it's based on an Alexander Pushkin novel, then Pushkin must spin in his grave every time someone watches that movie. The only way that I kept sane while watching it was by throwing out comments like on "Mystery Science Theater 3000" (and then when I wrote a review to turn in, I dedicated the review to Bob Denver, who had died a few weeks earlier). My point is, even that last reviewer would have to agree that "North" looks like "Citizen Kane" compared to "Baryshnya-Krestyanka".

    So that's my take on everything.
  • I just thought I would get that confession out of the way and into the open. Yes, I went to see this in theaters twice when I was 11 years old. I could list to you the excuses I have, such as the fact that my parents paid for my ticket, and there were only six theaters in my local multiplex at the time, and I had already seen "Forrest Gump". I could go on. The truth is that when I first saw a matinée showing of this film with a friend, neither of us thought it was a bad movie. Then I went to see another matinée showing a few days later on a rainy day with my brother and a babysitter, and they both hated the film. Not disliked, mind you, but hated it.

    They weren't the only ones. In the sixteen years since the film's release, I have heard nothing but bad things about it. It was released on VHS once, never on DVD, and Roger Ebert's review ("I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it") is now more famous than the movie itself.

    As a kid, I knew "North" wasn't a perfect film. In fact, its major flaw was (and still is) the major cop-out (and frankly lazy) ending that I won't give away. However, I thought it was enjoyable enough, it had a creative (but highly unrealistic) premise, and I liked (and still like) Elijah Wood. Before seeing the movie again after so many years, I wonder what I missed about it in the first place that other people didn't. After seeing it as a 27 year old, I wonder how I could have missed these things to begin with.

    I think what disappointed people the most about this movie was the fact that it had an all-star cast, a likable lead, an accomplished director (Rob Reiner) who had not directed a bad film before this one, and was based on a book written by Alan Zweibel, one of the original Saturday Night Live writers (who also wrote the screenplay). I haven't read that book, but the idea of a child leaving his parents is more sad than funny.

    Wood plays a child named North who is a stellar student, athlete, and actor, yet he is worried that his parents don't pay enough attention to him simply because they ignore him while arguing one night at the dinner table. His successful legal divorce from his parents causes a contrived media circus resulting in kids having control over their parents. Such a revolution is spearheaded by North's acquaintance Winchell (Matthew McCurley), a journalist for his school's newspaper who reminded me then of Stuart Minkus from "Boy Meets World" but now reminds me of Dick Cheney. In an even more contrived circumstance, Winchell becomes head of a major corporation, and plots to kill North when he decides to return to his original parents.

    Throughout the film, North goes around the world searching for better parents. He stays with various sets of adoptive parents. They include a couple in Texas (Dan Aykroyd and Reba McEntire) who dress like cowboys you find at the Ice Capades, Alaskans (Graham Greene and Kathy Bates) who send their elderly father (Abe Vigoda) out to sea to die in an archaic ritual that hasn't been practiced in 150 years, and Hawaiian parents who are all too eager to show North's rear end on a highway billboard. It makes me sick writing about these jokes, so you can imagine what it's like to watch it.

    Seeing this as a kid, I never took these plot points seriously, perhaps because I never thought about divorcing my parents. Seeing it again as an adult, here's what I missed that was so bad about the movie: the awful ethnic stereotyping that came in the form of tasteless one-liners and myopic character depictions. The worst came in the form of Kathy Bates putting on a blackface equivalent to play an Eskimo. I cringe now at the terrible joke made by the Hawaiian Governor Ho (Keone Young) about his wife (Lauren Tom) and her inability to procreate: "Hawaii is a lush and fertile land. In fact, there is only one barren spot on all of our islands. Unfortunately, it's Mrs. Ho.". If I were Mrs. Ho, I would have kicked him in the balls.

    We've all done foolish things as children. My foolish thing was the 12 dollars that went to waste from seeing this movie twice (although they were both matinees, so I saved some money). The important thing is that I know better now, and I reviewed this film recently before writing this review. This rule should apply to every amateur critic on this site: the way you remember movies you saw years ago is not the same as the way these movies actually are.

    Siskel & Ebert declared "North" the worst movie of 1994, and looking back, their reasoning was good. Is it the worst movie I've ever seen? No. Worse movies came out in 1994 ("It's Pat: The Movie" and "Exit To Eden" come especially to mind), and any movie written or directed by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer make "North" look like "Citizen Kane", and I doubt Ebert would disagree. However, there's no question that there's only one barren spot in Rob Reiner's directing career. Unfortunately, it's this movie.
  • When Harry Met Sally, A Few Good Men, The Story of Us... and I hear that This Is Spinal Tap is utterly hilarious... so what happened, Reiner? I guess everyone is entitled to make at least one mistake. Even if this particular one is really tough to forgive. If he hadn't proved himself so thoroughly after this, I'm not sure one could disassociate him from this. I haven't read the novel. Can it be as awful as this? I sure hope not. This is painfully stupid, unbelievably offensive and never actually funny. The jokes are disturbing, sick, weird and/or poor, and often based on ridiculous stereotypes that serve no other purpose than to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the two guys who wrote the script for this, Alan Zweibel and Andrew Scheinman, have not been out of their own country in their entire lives. This wastes so much acting and comedic talent that you have to wonder if there was some sort of bet involved, to see if they could actually get all of these skilled people and have them recite horrible material, and see if anyone would outright quit. I'm not sure I'd say that Elijah was one of them at this point, but then again, all the child performers in this are annoying. There is brief moderately strong language in this. The DVD has a trailer and about about ten minutes worth of interviews with the director and cast. I recommend... well, not this, not for anyone. If you do find yourself watching at least a little of this, I urge you to treat yourself to the Nostalgia Critic's video review of it. 1/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I saw this movie with an 8 year-old. It made me want to cry. This isn't because it was scary. It was because it was the worst movie I had ever seen and probably the worst I will ever see. Great cast means great movie, right??? NO! Not this time. Great cast, absolutely pathetic movie. Garbage, toxic waste, junk: they all describe North. North has no plot. It starts out with a kid falling asleep in a department store-- how original!!! Even members of it's intended audiences (children) do not like it. I saw the six year old girl behind me weeping and the nine year old boy ahead of me sleeping! Do not rent. Do not buy. Do not think about. Do not act foolishly like I have and waste even a minute writing about it. Forget that it ever existed.
  • Before watching this movie, have a sense of wonder first. Open your mind and see what the film is about rather than start criticizing it from the start. It is a wonderful film which is adequately made, and has its fun and memorable moments. There is also a moral in the story if you look for it, in fact the moral is also at the end of the movie. For a movie that emphasizes family values and togetherness, it doesn't go along in a preachy sort of way but allows Willis (watch the bunny!) and Wood (a pretty accomplished actor for his age) to tell it through their pretty exciting adventures (look at it from North's point of view).
  • Director Rob Reiner in eccentric spirits, but not quite getting the offbeat laughs and sentimental subtext he was going for. Extremely unfunny fantasy concerns unappreciated youngster who receives emancipation from his parents under the proviso he find a new set of guardians within 2 months. Celebrity-studded misfire is slick but not clever, with Bruce Willis in nearly a career-killing role as an angelic "guide" (he's also the film's narrator, in what plays like a last minute decision to fill in all the gaps). One or two fanciful scenes, but it needed more humor, less gooey uplift, and most especially an ending that didn't turn the picture into a pointless dodge. *1/2 from ****
  • zsscorp17 September 2009
    7/10
    Good
    I hate when people try to play the "Ill save you from this movie" part and analyze films like they "Understand" movies. I even saw a comment that warned parents from showing the movie to their children and called it EVIL! I bet they rather show another "Teletubies" episode...

    Overall its a fun movie, good jokes (smart at least), good actors. Maybe not a "must see" but definitely fun to watch. Hollywood guys used to make good movies back then. Besides, i really enjoyed the not-John McClane Willis...

    Every person that gave this movie less then 5 stars should be expelled from IMDb. :)

    Damn that 10 line rule...
  • Wow this movie was bad. I heard Siskel and Ebert slandering it when I was younger...and I was thinking that it couldn't possibly be that bad. Well,...I was wrong. Elijah Wood plays a boy who doesn't like his parents because they don't let him do everything that he wants to. She he decides to take them to court. And the suprising thing is that he actually wins. Kids don't get out of their homes when their parents are molesting them, beating them, and neglecting them, and North gets out because his parents don't let him run wild like he doesn't have any? The movie is just lame. Maybe it's amusing to 10 year olds who think that parents should let them do whatever they want, but the world just isn't like that. So get over it. The only good thing about this movie...of which many other commentaries have mentioned, was Bruce Willis in the pink bunny suit. I bet he will never live that down. He's probably looking back on this movie and crying. It was nice to see him in a 'family' movie. 2 out of 10. The 2 points are for the bunny costume.
  • cedde611 January 2013
    North (Elijah Wood), a bright and talented eleven year old boy (or so we're told) who clearly never had to go hungry but whose parents are so preoccupied with their career that they don't let him speak at the dinner table to dispense the wisdom his many gifts have bequeathed him (speaking of child-abuse), decide to "divorce" them and find himself a new set of parents more appreciative of his talents. Consequently, he meets a bunch of wannabe quirky characters who all desperately want to adopt him and is being helped along the way by his "guardian angel" (Bruce Willis).

    I've never really been one to join in on a mob. Crowds generally make me nervous and I usually regard any gathering of any kind with a healthy dose of suspicion. So jumping on any bandwagon just isn't me. Furthermore, I've always had a soft spot for the underdog, the ugly duckling, the universally vilified, always finding redeeming features to features that usually can't be redeemed. So obviously, when I heard of "North", the 1994 comedy from director Rob Reiner, with its stellar cast and very bad reputation, I was intrigued. Reiner has always been a director with a rather good track record, his movies usually ranging from decent to excellent. So how bad could "North" be? Or more accurately put: how does a bad Rob Reiner film look like?

    Well... "North" is a film that constantly struggles to find its audience and eventually fails to find any. As a film for adults, the "philosophical" narration provided by Bruce Willis never succeeds to soften the absurdity of the plot and as a film for children the whole thing is riddled with off-colour jokes and somewhat waspish clichés that make this spectacle quite inappropriate for that particular target audience. But where "North" really goes south is that failing to have a single joke that work, the film goes for the jugular and turns downright crass (the Hawaiian episode springs to mind, in that respect).

    Of course, one could argue that the film has its heart beating at the right place (like any other Rob Reiner film) and was simply a misguided effort but not quite. The fact of the matter is that "North" is never funny (which in itself is pure torture for a so-called comedy) but offensive and ultimately mean-spirited through its boring stereotypes and its attempts at poking fun at somewhat dodgy subjects, going as far as insulting the audience's intelligence with truck loads of ludicrous and stupid characters, the main villain here chief suspect among these, deserving of a good spanking before being sent to bed without dessert... for life.

    I so wanted to like this film, if only for the fact that it was generally reviled by everyone, which I admit is rather obnoxious of me. But I simply can't and must add my voice to the sound of the crowd as the song goes. Is "North" the worse film ever made? Well, I've certainly seen a lot worse. But somehow, thinking of it I feel like punching something. So that can't be good...
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is the closest Hollywood has come to doing a Monty Pythonish spin of American society (at least until the SOUTH PARK movie); but unfortunately it was made at the time when America took itself far too seriously and was too priggish to handle satirical jabs; especially compared to British, Australian or Canadian societies. It took the success of animated TV series like The Simpsons and South Park in order to get America to lighten up about itself. (It is very telling that most American critics enjoyed the poke at French society, yet couldn't stomach anything closer to home. It is also interesting that the only classic US geographic stereotype not included here is "hippyish" Californians!)

    The movie isn't without it's faults. The "assassination" scene in particular feels like a stock Hollywood action scenario that's been tacked on at the end. And the use of a pre-pubescent boy in a provocative advertising commercial is quite tasteless. But most of the time, this consists of well-staged comic set pieces with the tongue-in-cheek feel of a usual stand-up routine. My fav line is "So THAT'S why we had to stop 47 time!"; which is delivered with zeal - especially in the original theatrical release (you have to see the story to geddit). And it also has in the Texas scene one of the best staged musical numbers in modern American cinema (along with MY BEST FRIEND'S WEDDING). It is also interesting to compare the fictional critical reaction to North in "Fiddler on the Roof" to the real-life critical reaction to Haley Joel Osment in THE SIXTH SENSE/A.I.

    The movie deals with two central concepts. The first is the stock presentation of the young whizz-kid genius common at the time, with the attendant attitude that the World Owes Me a Living. (The prime dramatic example is Wesley Crusher of the TV series Star Trek:TNG). The second, related theme is the way that in the 80s and early 90s, Hollywood (and to a lesser extent America generally) tended to think of children almost purely as undersized adults - with the attached responsibilities and privileges. This film isn't the only one to deal with this; other examples include BIG SHOTS, THE LITTLE RASCALS, HOME ALONE 2 & 3 and even the TV series Uncle Buck. Attitudes have changed slightly since; Hollywood's notorious backlash against child actor Macaulay Culkin, and real-life incidents like the young girl who crashed piloting a plane across the US, and the grade-school boy who was suspended for kissing a girl have caused America to re-think the issue somewhat.

    Prior to this movie was the film IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES starring a young Drew Barrymore; and though it handled a child's divorce case a lot more crassly and tastelessly, it didn't receive nearly half the critical outrage this movie did. Even more amazing; an almost identical storyline was revamped (read: ripped off) in the film RUSHMORE; and though it's a lot more pretentious and ponderous in its delivery, the critics lauded it. Apparently having a whizz-kid neurotically stalk a grade-school teacher (among other things) is more critically commendable than having him learn "there's no place like home". Go figure!

    One of the regrettable outcomes of this movie is that talented actor Elijah Wood went from playing broad-ranging all-rounder variety of roles leading up to this film; to playing almost exclusively standard rote grungy drama roles afterwards. I half-suspect he's been put off comic roles for life; and quite frankly I wouldn't blame him - though it seems a crying shame! He showed a great deal of range and personality as a kid; and the Hollywood system squelched it!

    In summary; this is a flawed, but still widely under-appreciated satire of America's more eccentric social mores; which the American general public (and professional film critics in particular) weren't maturely sophisticated enough to handle.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    North is a charming movie about an eleven-year-old boy's feelings of inadequacy, even though he is successful in school, sports, and general hygiene. You see, North's parents do not appreciate him. So, he goes to his secret spot to do some thinking, and he falls asleep.

    What follows is North's dream about what life would be like if he were granted emancipation for two months in order to travel the world and find parents who appreciate him for who he is. He travels to Texas, Alaska, Hawaii, Amish country, Africa, China, France, and Illinois. Part of the humor in this movie is the ridiculous views North has regarding the cultures in these various locations. His conceptions of these places are over the top, stereotypical, and, yes, maybe offensive to some. But, young North's dream world does not upset me because I am positive that all children aged 11 have some crazy ideas regarding different cultures.

    Of course, while North is gone his "friend," the power-hungry journalist Winchel, uses North's emancipation to create an empire in which children rule. Winchel threatens that the situation will get ugly if North decides to return to New York and his natural parents.

    The movie has many stars in it, and it's clear that they had fun making this movie. My favorite, though, is Bruce Willis, who acts as North's guide along the way.

    I don't know if adults who have never seen this movie will appreciate it due to its narrow, childlike view of the world, but I loved it as a child and still enjoy the movie today.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This movie directed by Rob Reiner is often regarded as one of the worst films ever made, but somehow I kinda like it. Don't get me wrong, there is a lot of things, wrong and unpleasant about this movie. The movie was often panned by many critics for its humorless jokes, adult content, racial insensitivity, ethnic stereotyping, cold-hearted characters, references to pedophilia and incomprehensible plot with an awful twist ending. I do agree with them, but I find myself, defending the movie, more, because it's told in the eyes of a trouble, often neglect, young child, North (Elijah Woods) who wish to have better parents. Without spoiling too much, I believe there seem to be more, to the film, that it's stating out. Based on the novel, North: The Tale of a 9-Year-Old Boy Who Becomes a Free Agent and Travels the World in Search of the Perfect Parents by Alan Zweibel, the movie started out with North having a panic attack, and begins to lose consciousness. Call it a depressing fan theory, but I really think, the whole movie secretly is about North's final thoughts. He either about to die, or in a coma-like dream, wondering if his parents honestly love him. It wasn't his parents in a coma, it was him. This would make sense, why his secret spot looks like self-made purgatory, and why his guardian angel (Bruce Willis) comes out, as the Easter Bunny. It's a hint to the idea of resurrection. North is stuck, there, until he can come to terms, if he wants to live with his parents or not. This would explain, why the rest of the story is told in a child-like view of the world. Everywhere that he visits, is shown like a cartoon, stereotype matter. It's ironic that North is his name, because everybody that follows a compass believes North is prime direction, but it wasn't until North step out his borders, that the film shows how little, he knows of the world, and how truly directionless, he is. There is a scene that explains, that North fails in geography that somewhat, proves this theory. Still, all these fan theories, doesn't excuse the movie for how stupid the movie is. There are scenes in the movie that are so obnoxious that it was a bit unbearable. The worst for me, has to be the musical number in Texas that I found annoying, ripping hard to rip away 1959's TV show Bonanza and 1978's show, Dallas. The whole journey of racist insensitivity was a bit rough. The most offensive, has to be the whole Eskimo 'flow' scene. At least, all the characters kinda stand out. It's so weird, seeing so many big names actors playing insulting characters. I really think actors like Kathy Bates, Reba McEntire, Dan Aykroyd, and others probably fired their agents after seeing their performance in this film. Other actors seem not to care too much for the film, and just wing it, like Bruce Willis, Richard Belzer & Alan Arkin. Then, there are those actors that play it as if they were just, doing another Seinfeld episode like Jason Alexander & Julia Louis Dreyfus. Some actors really did, put some work into their characters, such as John Ritter & Elijah Woods. It's also worth noting that the movie even has young Scarlett Johansson in a minor role. The movie took friendly jabs at film and televisions references, such as the squeaky clean 1950's family suburbia, 1954's Father Knows Best, 1957's Leave it to Beaver, and 1960's Andy Griffin Show. It downright, nearly parody them in the Nelson sequence. Other good things about the film, is how the movie was shot by cinematographer, Adam Greenberg. The opening with all the snow-globes, foreshadowing North's adventure was pretty cool to see. This movie is the film that got me, hook on collecting snow globes, so thank you for that. A lot of work, also went into the exotic sets. My favorite has to be the Eskimo village, where everything looks like it's made of ice. It remind me of the Flintstone, TV show, with its fantasy juxtaposition of modern everyday objects with that of ice world setting. That was pretty cool. The movie made great use of all the locations. It was breath-taking beautiful. One thing, I have to say, was amazing is the theme song from Marc Shaiman. It was so whimsical, but charming. Despite, the all-star cast, and a good director at the helm, North will probably be, most well-known as the film that got famous film critic Roger Ebert super-ass mad about. No doubt, about it, North will continue to receive aggressively negative reviews. Is the movie, the worst thing, out there? No. I have saw worst. Overall: It's bad, but it can be 'so bad, it's good', somewhat watchable, if you turn off your brain. Check it out, if you want to, but I don't recommended, unless you want a headache.
  • Why does everyone slam this movie?????I liked it!! What were the critics expecting? Oscar worthy stuff?? I mean, obviously it's not. But that doesn't mean it's not enjoyable. That's one reason why I hate critics. They're mean. I only watched this movie because of Elijah Wood (I love him!!), and I wasn't expecting it to be that good, but I was surprised!! In a good way. So if you want to see this movie, don't listen to the critics!!! Use your own judgement, people. That's all.

    Luv, Farfalla Dolce

    By the way, about the swearing and stuff in the movie, is it reall that bad? I mean, as if kids who watch the movie don't use them already. Seriously people, just think about it!! It was a cute movie, let's leave it at that.
  • NOTE: Some of you may be offended by the language in this review. If you are, DO NOT see the movie. All the language here is taken directly from the movie.

    Roger Ebert "hated, hated, hated" this movie, and while I wouldn't go as far as to say that, this certainly ranks as the worst (by far) Elijah Wood movie on record. The quality of such an actor as Wood or Bruce Willis can't overcome the fact that "North" has absolutely no idea what kind of movie it wants to be.

    At first glance, "North" seems to be a kids movie. The plot, in which the title character searches for the ideal parents, is a child's dream. The main characters (except Willis' "guardian angel" role) are either kids or stupid. The message is a simple one about what constitutes a true family, and only a child would be unable to determine the exact outcome within the first thirty minutes of the film. "North" feels like a live-action Saturday morning cartoon.

    But do kids movies have sex jokes? Do kids movies talk about men having blood in their stool or boys balls sticking to their legs in hot weather? Do kids movies have children utter words like "asshole"? Do kids movies have the main character apparently get shot in the head? It's one thing to have elements that will appeal to adults, but those elements shouldn't force parents to cover their kids' ears.

    North is a bad movie. Parents (and everyone else) be warned.

    Grade D- (a few good jokes and the always lovable Wood, but this is a movie that never should have been made)
  • May contain spoilers.

    I was only 6 years old when I watched North - apparently this was old enough to notice its stupidity. Despite all of its manic plot points, the movie is very forgettable. In fact, I completely forgot that Bruce Willis was in this movie. But maybe that was just my unconscious mind it blocking out.

    So, at only six years old I found this movie incredibly stupid. Watching the scenes in Hawaii, I was incredibly embarrassed - for the actors, for the people of Hawaii - everyone.

    And it only got worse.

    I enjoyed the musical number in Texas, mostly because I'm a Reba fan. And it was kind of amusing to see George and Elaine from Seinfeld as a couple, amusing at first anyways.

    And what else can be said about this movie? Most of it is horrible and or unwatchable. But it's not the worst movie I've ever seen. Hell, I suppose it's better than Mortal Combat 2, or Garbage Pail Kids. ( Hardly high praise ).

    So remember, if you are stuck with the choice, North is probably better than MK2, but worse than say, most anything else.
  • dlzzx10 August 2003
    Warning: Spoilers
    This movie is Pure Concentrated EVIL! The pain that a friend and I suffered watching this movie was intensified by the fact that audience we saw it with (free screening btw) clapped at the end. I have not seen this abomination since 94, so I can't give any details except one. (SPOILER which you should read). The whole wretched thing was a freakin dream. Rob Reiner's previously great directing work was completely destroyed by this so called film. The curse of NORTH will haunt him for the rest of his life.
  • I'm a little shocked this only received 4.1 stars out of 10! Last night I watched "North" for the first time and was pleasantly surprised at how much I enjoyed it. Elijah Wood is irresistible as little North, a young boy who decides to venture out and find new parents after his two bickering ones (Julia Louis-Dreyfuss and Jason Alexander) pay no attention to him. Bruce Willis is great as a man who reappears and offers valuable advice everywhere North goes, and the rest of the movie is dotted with familiar faces, too. While this film is by no means an Oscar winner, it's lighthearted and certainly enjoyable for a family to watch (no major cursing, no nudity, etc). Elijah Wood's performance alone is worth it...yes, he is a big name presently, but bearing in mind this was made in 1994, his acting was quite phenomenal for such a young boy! So if you're looking for a cute movie, suitable for children and something other than Disney or animation, give "North" a whirl!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I agree with the late Roger Ebert, as you can see in my title. It was a movie with the most flawed, stupid, and heartless plot, and was made in a pathetic attempt to be funny, which it sure as hell wasn't. Happily ditching your parents without the slightest bit of emotion, because of, what we saw, the father spends a few minutes expressing to North's mother about his stupid pants factory job. The "pants factory" he worked in itself was supposed to be some kind of joke, each "worker" there was dressed in some stupid costume dancing or acting without any reason or punchline. That was not a pants factory, nobody was seen actually making or manufacturing pants. It was just a joke that was stupid and didn't make sense. That was only the tip of this awful iceburg which many of us wish would've melted. There were so many other horrible things about this movie.

    I don't have room here to write all of the terrible things about this 90 minute monstrosity, but here are some of them: 11 year old North (Elijha Wood) fakes a heart attack after his dad's (Jason Alexander) pants talk and mentioning blood in his stool, and his parents both immediately jump to his rescue showing genuine concern. BUT, North still immediately divorces himself from his parents without a care about their reaction, and with almost the whole freakin world not only understanding towards North about it, but with looking at North as some kind of international hero! Basically, North was a kid who got good grades, played baseball, acted in a school play, but he wasn't some superhero. He deserted his parents for (gasp!) spending a few moments talking to each other instead of talking just to him and ignoring each other every minute of the day like he apparently expected them to do! And that is what made him an international legend above all other kids around the world!? Nevermind the kids in the world with parents who abuse, hit, beat up, molest, or really ignore or abondon their kids. In this movie, what North's parents did was seen as a worse thing for parents to do than any of those other things! And to add insult to severe injury, North was a total hypocrite because he complained about his parents being selfish, but he then made the most extreme selfish move just to suit his selfish and also irrational wishes (and the bratty spoiled way he said "I'm not common!" to Easter Bunny Bruce Willis).

    There are still many more horrible things in this movie, North's parents freeze into some comatose state, stay that way through court, and for like another two months and are put on display like that! Jon Lovitz has an annoying performance first as North's lawyer, then as the lacky of 11 year old genuis Winchell who first assists North and then him and Lovitz team up to make sure North will never go back to his parents, and to build a global empire with the works including fancy office, limo driver, and hit man who tries to shoot North!

    There are still many more terrible things in this movie, since I still haven't even began to discribe North's experiences searching for "better" parents. The Texans, Hawaiins, and Alaskan scenes are nothing but annoying unfunny jokes and puns. And, each of those scenes have parents try to do things much worse than his real parents ever did. The Texans insist on making North obese to replace their other deceased obese son. The Alaskans make the grandfather of the family flow out to sea to die (and with the parents being totally unemotional about it and saying "it's for the best before he starts embarrassing himself"). And the worst of all, the Hawaiians insisting on displaying a perverse photo of North on billboards. And the parents say it's to raise their self esteem! What!!? And there's still more horrible stuff, Jerry Lewis on every channel in Paris, North to become the emperor of China!? And North staring fascinatingly at his potential mother/topless African tribal woman!? Then we got two pathetic 50s sitcom rip-offs in the movie (I like 50s sitcoms mind you, I just didn't like the stupid ways they was referenced here). First the Alaskan parents out of nowhere whistling the Andy Griffin theme tune, and then the cardboard reference of the Beavers in the Nelson residence that North seeks potential parents from.

    There is still more bad stuff in this movie, down to geographical ignorance. There is no snow and ice on the ground between Jueno and Anchorage, Alaska in July, or a long airplane runway connecting the two cities because airplanes in Alaska don't skid upon landing for 2 hours. But never mind, it was just another of the many many many failed jokes in this movie.

    Then, SPOILER, we have the cop-out ending of almost everything in the movie being a dream, from him earlier on falling asleep in that chair to waking up about 4 minutes before the credits. I did question if the Winchell character was in North's real world as another kid at his school, but it seemed he only appeared in his dream and was nowhere to be seen in any of the school scenes before North fell asleep. Well, it doesn't really matter, because this movie was just too awful to save in any way.

    There's still more awful things about this movie, but I've definitely listed enough of them now to give most people very very good reason not to waste another hour and a half of their lives witnessing something so upsetting and painful.
  • I watched North when I was about 10. My Mom rented it from a video store I and I watched it when I had to flu. Perhaps it was because I was sick that enjoyed this movie, or perhaps it was because even at a young age I knew I loved absurdity. The crux of North is that it is a child's fantasy: it doesn't make sense, it's dialogue is illogical and it's a little disturbing. However, recent sentimental or children's fantasy (Series of Unfortunate Events or Big Fish) are using techniques that North was using years ago. I won't make the assertion that this movie is avant garde, but if it was perhaps a little ahead of it's time, it'd certainly explain the slating it's receiving now. North has stuck with me for 8 years, and only now do I want to watch it again. Children's fantasy should do this; it's like Phoebe singing to the children about promiscuity, why lie to children? Life is surreal and they know it better than anyone.
  • Say you have $40 million to make a movie. You have a great director and a wonderful cast topped off with a great young actor. The story is nothing too big so the $40 mil should cover it. You seem to have the makings for a potential classic. Nothing could go wrong with this, right? Right?

    But the movie you'd have would be North. And apparently things did go wrong. Many...many things. Or possibly the only thing that went wrong was the story chosen. The story is about an 11 year old boy named North (now how could a movie NOT be funny with such an unusual name for a character?), played by a pre-Frodo Elijah Woods, who feels his parents are mistreating him because they don't pay attention to him. So he gets a lawyer, who he finds literally chasing an ambulance, haha, and divorces his parents. Now because he's such an overachieving little wretch, letters come pouring in from families who would LOVE to have North as a part of their family.

    Bruce Willis plays...well I don't really know WHAT Bruce Willis plays. Whatever he has of a character is too useless to be a guardian angel. He doesn't really DO anything. He first shows up in an Easter Bunny costume (the movie just keeps getting funnier and funnier) and sits next to North in his (North's) secret spot, a chair in the middle of a department store. Now, maybe Alan Zweibel's definition of 'secret' differs from mine, but shouldn't a 'secret spot' be a spot that nobody else knows about? I'm pretty sure at least a couple people noticed that, GASP, there's a chair in the middle of the department store.

    Watching North is like receiving a shotgun blast to the crotch, stretched out over 87 minutes, only without as much permanent damage. Some of the people involved have done so many other great movies that I can forgive them for this. However, Alan Zweibel has not only done nothing of note besides this, he wrote the story this movie was based on. The script is the sole reason this movie is bad. It certainly isn't the actors; it's not the director, Rob Reiner. The plot twists, or attempt thereof, are lame, and the final one is just insulting to anybody who has the misfortune of watching this movie.

    Avoid this movie at all costs. No matter what is on the other channels or at the video store, nothing is as bad or worse than North.
  • I first saw this film in 1995 when I was just 11 years old and I absolutely adored it. The idea of a kid divorcing his parents, the cowboys, the Eskimos, Bruce Willis in a Bunny suit,and of course, 'My Crack!' Eight years later, I still love this film. Some may call it stupid, but I call it fun, because I can still remember being that kid falling out of my chair laughing. It's a quirky film with a great beginning, a delightful middle and a surprise ending, and anyone who can still remember what it's like to be a kid will enjoy it.
  • bbx2 January 2001
    A comic fantasy, the humour is witty and quite intelligent. I find Rob Reiner films to be pretty good and this was no exception. Also, the fact that the book author was involved in the production of the film suggests a reasonable transition to film took place. It proved to be a pleasant surprise after hearing all the bad criticism. My only complaint is the prominent product placement of an American postal company which appears to be endemic throughout Hollywood e.g. The Matrix, Runaway Bride etc.
  • I love Rob Reiner and his movies, Stand By Me, When Harry Met Sally, This is Spinal Tap, The Princess Bride and Misery are classics and I enjoyed The American President and The Bucket List.

    North did intrigue me with its idea, message and the cast, however these two things aren't enough to stop it from being Reiner's worst and most disappointing film. I liked the musical number in Texas and the mostly extravagant visuals.

    On the other hand, the writing is incredibly forced and stupid, the Hawaai sequence anyone, the story is thin and has no idea what it wants to be and Reiner gives his clumsiest directing job here. The characters are poorly conceived and written, and the acting is lamentable considering how talented the cast is.

    Elijah Wood I quite like, but I found him rather obnoxious and over-eager here. Jason Alexander and Julia Louis-Dreyfuss are wasted, while Buce Willis' role could best be described as a career killer.

    All in all, liked the idea but found the effort very clumsy. It is sad that Reiner stooped as low as this. 2/10 Bethany Cox
An error has occured. Please try again.