Add a Review

  • while easily falling into the category of b-horror, this isn't nearly as horrible as i expected. after reading MANY reviews on IMDb and elsewhere that were scathingly negative about this sequel, i figured i'd try it out since i enjoy the original (and lance henriksen) and of course...i had to see if the bad reviews were accurate.

    very fortunately (and heres the upside to going in with low expectations) this film pleasantly surprised me...not as good as the original, not incredibly connected to the original, however, it does what it sets out to do quite well. as far as the pumpkinhead sequels go..this is the one to check out.

    i wish i had anything complimentary to say about volume III in this series...however...that's pure crap, stay away..and what a waste of both lance henriksen and doug bradley... but i digress.

    blood wings isn't a great movie my any means, but fan of horror know that you must judge horror movies far differently from films outside the genre... and as far as horror movies go, i find this to be extremely underrated.

    but tastes are like ***holes so... give it a whirl and post your own
  • *****Five Out of Ten Stars*****

    Considering this film was made in three weeks, it's not all that bad. It's a strange film; there are quality experienced actors combined with unprofessional actors. Robinson and Edmond's acting talents are wasted on this rushed production. The original director bailed out of the project at the last minute and they had a difficult time finding other qualified director's to pick it up. Jeff Burr accepted the directors role reluctantly, I think, at the last minute.

    The plot just isn't faithful to the original, which is a big let down. The script isn't bad but is totally hammed up by a number of unprofessional actors. You can feel Robinson's frustration in some scenes as he contends with acting counterparts with no talent. The special effects are decent enough, if not slightly behind, considering this was made in 1993 and 1994.

    Even though I was thoroughly disappointed in the handling of this sequel, I do own it on DVD. My love for the original PH keeps me faithful to this one and the third segment, but definitely not the fourth installment, "Blood Feud". It's a shame one of the major movie studios didn't try to do more with this franchise. The pumpkin head monster could've been used more effectively than it was used in the sequels. Perhaps one of the main studios could've picked the pumpkin head idea up and released several sequels around Halloween. Why Sci-Fi got involved in this franchise, I'll never know? But once Sci-Fi gets involved in any project, the project is destined for the "straight to DVD" category.

    P.H. II is a brainless ride that should be taken for what it's worth: A rushed production, made for under $1,000,000, that no one really seemed to care a whole lot about. A better plot more faithful to the original, better acting, and a slower production pace would've gone a long way in producing a sequel worthy of the original. Take a whirl on "Blood Wings" if you're a die hard PH fan, if your not, you'll have issues with it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Pumpkinhead 2 is not an awful movie plus it does provide some decent thrills and chills. That being said, i don't think it was a great idea to label this as a sequel to the first Pumpkinhead. Other than the general appearance of the creature, reinventing the mythology is confusing for those of us that liked the first movie. Perhaps they should have called it "Pumpkinhead: Resurrection," and explained that Pumpkinhead creatures came from certain circumstances that are now repeating for the second time. Oh well. The movie is in the can and you have to either take it, warts and all, or pass it by. It's worth at least one watch if you are a die-hard horror movie fan.
  • I'm going to preface this by saying, I enjoyed Pumpkinhead I. It was a good story about backwoods lore. Though the camera found the monster a little too often (Stan Winston can be forgiven for falling in love with his creation, though) it was a good 80's popcorn horror flick.

    Having said that, the people who made Pumpkinhead 2: Bloodwings, should be skinned alive, strapped to a chair with their eyelids peeled open and forced to watch this ridiculous piece of garbage again and again. Did Andrew Robinson even read the script before he showed up to shoot this train-wreck?

    You were in Hellraiser for God's sake, have some pride!

    Did these idiots even watch the first film? Was that old woman supposed to be the same witch that stole Lance Henricksen's soul? I hope not--because otherwise, it's quite an accomplishment that she was suddenly good, and that her name was changed.

    The fifties flashback? The mullet-ed mayor with the guitar? The annoying medical examiner who--for some strange reason is ALWAYS at the sheriff's house? And the idea that this new Pumpkinhead was the hell-spawn of the old Pumpkinhead and some "not so special woman" is idiotic. What? Are you trying to tell me they slept together? Did you see the first movie? If you look closely, you'll notice that ol' Pumpkinhead isn't exactly anatomically correct.

    The absolute most horrendous part of this movie came in the character of Paul--otherwise known as the friend who didn't get any throughout the whole film. I want to say something to Paul right now, are you listening? You had no point at all in this film. You deserved to get killed for those stupid clothes you had on. Your one job was to go and get the car from around front--you couldn't even do that right. May God have mercy on your soul.

    I don't know why God let this movie get made. My buddy Marc told me I had to watch it because it was so stupid. I believed him beforehand, but--in a Twilight Zone-ian sense, I had no idea HOW RIGHT he was. I want to conjure Pumpkinhead to come get him for having brought it home from the video store.

    I feel like having watched this movie, I've somehow been exposed to some great and terrible contagion that will make me incapable of appreciating a good movie ever again.
  • After sitting through a TV viewing of Pumpkinhead II, I was never so glad to *not* have spent $3 on a rental in all my life. I am usually a fan of low-budget, low-talent horror flicks, but this was just awful! The fact that Roger Clinton was in it should've been a tipoff, but I was in it to see Andrew Robinson ... An actor is only as good as his script, and even he couldn't save this thing. Now my question is this: what sort of hallucinogenic drug were those writers taking? I'd just like to know so I can stay away from it.
  • You would think that a sequel to a half-decent horror flick starring Punky Brewster and Bill Clinton's little brother would be at least bearable, but this proves just how awful a movie can really be. The creature looks more fake than he did in the original, Lance Henriksen isn't in the cast this time and there isn't even any decent breast shots of Soleil Moon-Frye. A waste of time and (dare I say) talent.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Review contains SPOILERS !!!

    Well, first of all, the videostore ripped me off on this one. I rented a cool looking movie called Pumpkinhead and Lance Henriksen stood on the cover. I had read some praising reviews on it so I took it with me. When I put it in the VCR, the first thing it said was : PUMPKINHEAD 2: BLOOD WINGS. Hmmmm...not correct. Normally, I never watch sequels before I saw the originals but since I had already paid for it I continued watching. From what I've learned in the sequel, the myth behind this little fella called Pumpkinhead is pretty cool. Even the intro of this film makes you suspect you're about to see a great horror story. ( A good old-fashioned black and white sequence shows how a horrible deformed boy get killed by angry young men ). Impressive demon as well, I've sure seen worse. But unfortunately...that about does it for the positive elements on Blood Wings.

    I was glad to see Andrew Robinson again ! This guy became immortal in my eyes since he played the leading character in my all time favorite movie Hellraiser. Too bad this is actually the only one on his list worth mentioning. His daughter in this movie is played by Ami Dolenz. She's a very attractive girl but that doesn't mean she can act, I'm afraid. The whole group of "tough" teenagers remind of Beavis and Butt-head to be honest.

    "Hey Beavis, you wanna go raise a demon ?"

    " huh, huh...yeah Cool...euh...why, Butt-head?"

    "euh...huh huh...euh...I dunno! "

    " huh huh...yeah cool...let's raise a demon ! "

    Well, maybe a bit exaggerated but it's pretty much the idea behind it. A group of modern teenagers raise a demon and they go away. The hideous creature is loose and starts a killing spree. Not random victims, though. There seems to a connection between the murdered people. It's up to the new sheriff to find out what that is. The viewer know it after about 5 minutes but Andrew ( the Sheriff ) needs a whole 85 minutes for it.

    Pure talking horror, I also have a positive note concerning this film. I've already said the demon looks impressive and above that, it knows how to kill, indeed. If you like your horror gory, you'll appreciate several scenes of Pumpkinhead 2. He has a cool walk and vision as well. In fact, I have the same vision-style when I'm drunk...
  • eskdale565 June 2005
    This movie starts out with an obvious and long standing premise that bad boys (and girls) are the only ones who can start occult trouble. I guess I can forgive this film for using that tired old premise, if it only stopped there. Unfortunately it doesn't, Roger Clinton as "Mayor Bubba?" Who's idea was that? He didn't look like a Mayor of a dusty old town, let alone that dusty old town. He neither acted like a mayor, nor added anything to the film. At best he could be called a stupid, trivial and distracting interlude.

    Jumping back to the black and white beginning (rip off of the technique first used by the Wizard of Oz), I know we watch these movies for blood and gore, but the opening scene when the deformed Tommy is chased down hanged, sliced and diced, then dumped down the old iron mine was truly shocking, I found my mouth hanging open and I am no pansy when it comes to violence, blood and guts. It was gratuitously violent, left nothing to the imagination and never even satisfied with a good explanation for why it occurred. Yes, we know in real life that there is gratuitous violence, some even unexplained as to its origin, but in the movies I think I'm entitled to an explanation why a group of teenagers in a dusty old town suddenly maim and lynch a deformed outcast.

    I won't go into the acting--can't expect much in the way of great acting in a slice and dice horror flick. That hair style of Caran Kaye! Whew that broom on her head that passes for bangs--I actually found them distracting, staring to figure out how they got the hair to stand out like that.

    I put this one right down there with Mom & Dad Save the Universe. Pass it up. The better movie is the original Pumpkinhead, holds together much better.
  • Sean Braddock takes up residence as sheriff in Ferren Woods, the town he grew up in, along with his wife and rebellious daughter Jenny. Straight away she gets in with the wrong crowd, where the group cause trouble one night when they accidentally cause the fire of an old witch's house and for fun unknowingly resurrect the demon known as "Pumpkinhead". The soul of the deformed orphan who lived in the woods returns to this deranged monster. It sweeps the countryside seeking revenge against those who were behind his death three decades ago and plus those teenagers who brought him back. Grisly death mount up, and Sheriff Broddock learns that the legend of the "Pumpkinhead" might have its foot in reality.

    Do I care about its bad reputation? I guess not. Since I took the time to watch it. The low-budget, straight-to-video sequel is an okay addition that had its moments and sound performances to cater for its blaring shortcomings. However it's the monster we're waiting for, and director Jeff Burr (a sequel journeyman you could say) serves up the beast and bloody mayhem on a silver plateau. The ominously atmospheric first one (with a sublime lead performance by Lance Henriksen) is certainly superior in every department, but as for sequels go. You could do a lot worse. Well, it does seem like a pointless exercise, but just like the first sequel to "Candyman", the story plays the usual trumps (basic retread of first), but it also wants to overfeed the history of "Pumpkinhead". Burr knows there's nothing to surprise us anymore with a frail plot with an promising premise, so there's more of the monster shown on screen and what it dishes out is far more nastier, violent and more imaginative in its carnage. There's just something creepy and cruel about the deaths.

    The make-up effects have some juicy inclusions, despite some cheap and corny looking aspects, but the imposing monster design still looks fair enough, even with some rubbery shades. Burr's junky direction is cheerful and plucky, but he demonstrates few striking visuals with well-filtered lighting (like strobe) that come across as foreboding in their set-up. Sometimes it can get laughable with too many hapless victims just standing there in front of "Pumpkinhead" waiting to get killed off, when there's an actual chance to do something or RUN! However the atmosphere is very patchy, which makes sure it doesn't have the same impact the original created.

    Streaming from the production is a cheap TV feel, but the swiftly compact camera-work manages some inventive tilt frames, wild movements and trippy red "Pumpkinhead" vision lensing. The thrills and pace were kind of a stop and go affair, as you really felt it because the tepidly cardboard script lead to many silly (and contrived) avenues working there way in and the lack of an strong lead performance really showed it up immensely. There's nothing wrong with Andrew Robinson's sincerely hearty performance as Sheriff Braddock, but intensity was lacking, instead there seemed to be a lighter tone to everything about it. Except for the violence, of course. Thinking more about it actually, he looked rather flustered. The gorgeous Ami Dolenz makes for a wonderful performance as Jenny and Gloria Hendry kicks up some interest. The rest of the hysterical cast aren't so memorable, while the teens weren't particularly that good with the stereotypical traits. With Steve Kanaly, Hill Harper, Soleil Moon Frye and J. Trevor Edmond. Appearing in small and amusing parts are a familiar Linnea Quigley and Kane Hodder. Yep the trivia is right, Bill Clinton's brother Roger Clinton shows up as the Town's mayor.

    Formulaic, cheesy b-fun emerges from this earnest sequel that doesn't try to outdo its original, but more so complement it. Maybe it's bad, but I kinda enjoyed it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Pumpkinhead 2 is not a terrible movie and it does manage to provide a few minor chills. However, the choice to shake up the mythology can be jarring and confusing to anyone who really love the first one. Though I guess it's better to do that earlier in a franchise than later. I question is they should've even tied it to the first one by labeling it Part 2 and treated it as a spin-off or a reboot to help explain why these Pumpkinhead creatures are a little different. It's still manages to be a decent movie over all and I would still recommend to any horror fan. Especially if you like the first one.
  • neon4726 October 2005
    The only words I can gather for this movie are "the worst sequel ever made period." I can't find any positives about this movie. Quite seriously, I wish I could because I loved the first Pumpkinhead so much. What happened?! I know sequels normally suck, but they're not supposed to suck THIS much. I'm actually at a loss right now because I don't know if this or Boogeyman is worse. The movie kicks off with a hideously deformed boy being brutally murdered and then hung down a mine shaft. Now he's buried in front of what appears to be a witch's house. 20 mins into the movie and Pumpkinhead is created not this time by the witch but rather by some "thrill seeking teenagers" and I actually believe the group labels themselves as "thrill seekers" before they resurrect Mr. Angry. After Pumpkinhead is resurrected you might as well turn off your DVD player (or if you're old school, VHS player) and turn the movie into a novelty flying disc because then at least you can say that it's a GOOD movie (trust me, it glides real nice and cuts air like a hot knife through butter). The acting is beyond terrible. Remember Saw? Remember how the acting sucked in the beginning but got better as the movie progressed? The acting gets worse and worse as this one goes on. And the ending... oh buddy. If you remember how the first Pumpkinhead ended your gonna be on angry mofo because there's a very special something taken out that made the Pumpkinhead villain so unique. Overall, don't watch this. Rather use it as a clay pigeon, use it as a frisbee golf disc, or use it for self mutilation because you're gonna be wondering why you let this movie finish. Watch the first, but ignore this disgraceful sequel.
  • I think Pumpkinhead 2 is a great sequel to Pumpkinhead, the first one is still great but this one had a bit more gore. The acting was OK, Andrew Robinson was good and I enjoyed his performance, even in Dirty Harry and Hellraiser.

    Pumpkinhead looks the same but the suit isn't as realistic as the first but it still looks cool. Haggis is different from the first film but the make up for the character is still good.

    Jeff Burr who directed Puppet Master 4, Puppet Master 5: The Final Chapter and Leatherface: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre III directs Pumpkinhead 2 and does a good job of it.

    Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings may not be for all but this is a good film with some nice gore in parts.
  • This is a worthy sequel to the cult classic from the 80's "Pumpkinhead". Sadly, the movie improves in little aspects in comparison to the original. This time, the f/x is very cheesy but it's okay for B-movie standards. The Pumpkinhead demon looks extremely cheesy and scary it's the lesser thing about it. But surprisingly, it works for the movie.

    The plot is actually interesting and has potential but it's just not executed correctly. The invocation, the ritual are good scenes and may be the best feature about the movie. When the snob guys whacks the head of the witch is also a good scene in the movie.

    Anyways, if you are an avid lover (like me) of the 90's un necessary sequels, watch "Blood Wings" and buy popcorn. This is cheesy entertainment in Horror.
  • This horror flick not only is violent, but horridly lame...and has nothing to do with the original PUMPKINHEAD(1989). A group of predictably stupid teenagers resurrect a fabled demon and the creature goes on a bloodthirsty rampage. The messy killing is not enough; the avenging monster leaves a calling card in the form of painted wings at each murder scene. Sheriff Braddock(Andrew Robinson)shares his childhood memories that relate to the origins of the Pumpkinhead legend. Viewing the promotion trailer may just be better than enduring this nerve wrecker. The cast is full of familiar faces: Ami Dolenz, Soleil Moon Frye, Steve Kanaly and Caren Kaye. And yes, Mayor Bubba is THAT Roger Clinton.
  • Pumpkinhead II: Bloodwings is a slightly mixed bag. Director Jeff Burr has had better results from sequels in the past (Leatherface) but does his best with the material. I might not love the story, but you won't hear me complain about the cast. Bloodwings has a great cast featuring some familiar genre faces and a few veterans. These faces include Andrew Robinson, J. Trevor Edmund, Joe Unger, scream queen Linnea Quigley, and Kane Hodder. Throw Punky Brewster and former president Bill Clinton's brother in the mix and you've got the cast. I enjoy the score as well; very reminiscent of Southern Comfort. One of the best pieces of this puzzle is KNB effects. KNB's work is always fun to watch. With all this going for it, I still can't help but feel like something's missing. Something is holding it back from me giving it a positive review. One aspect I don't like is that it has little to do with the original, other than the vengeful demon. Speaking of the demon, he seems to carry around a strobe light that gets real old real quick. And the look and feel stinks of the straight-to-video curse. On one hand, it doesn't touch the original. On the other, it just didn't need to be made.

    "Bolted doors and windows barred, guard dogs prowling in the yard, won't protect you in your bed, nothing will from Pumpkinhead."
  • I first saw this in the early 90s on a vhs.

    Revisited it recently.

    This is nowhere close to the original and this movie has zero atmosphere n zero tension.

    The original has oodles of atmosphere n it also boasted of Lance Henriksen's presence.

    This one is filled with annoying characters, terrible dialogues, abysmal acting n awful screenplay.

    The only saving grace is some gory kills n a bit of nudity.

    A huge character gets picked up by Pumpkinhead and the character's back is broken by Pumpkinhead a la wrestling style.

    A character gets pecked to death by chickens, those eyeballs man.

    Linnea Quigley shows her boobs once again.
  • I just wanted to clarify that this film WAS IN THEATERS!!! It was not direct to video!!! IMDb IS WRONG!!! (as usual I have VHS of the TV ads for this film!

    It received a large amount of free media attention due to the current president's brother Roger Clinton appearing in the film.

    Once again, this was in theaters, it was NOT direct to video.

    As proof I can break out my complete VHS of 'All My Children' for 1993 and show you the ads for this film! It was in theaters!

    This film is in fact a very poor follow up to Stan Winston's cult classic.

    It does not contain any of the characters from the first film. The story is merely a rehash of the original. A woman in run over by city slicker teens and a witch conjures the demonic monster Pumpkinhead to kill them.

    So it's just like the first film sans the good FX and photography.
  • Good in its own right, but not as a sequel. Instead, it plays more like a prequel. This film is more of a slasher, although justified since the murders are not random and well explained. The plot is not that great either, but the film was nevertheless still enjoyable.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    So i'm not really sure why we needed a somewhat sequel to Stan Winston's classic first film coming six years after the original. This one is helmed by Jeff Burr who directed "From a Whisper to a Scream", "Stepfather II", & "Leatherface: Texas Chainsaw Massacre III". And Winston didn't even return to do effects. Instead it was done by Greg Nicotero and the crew at KNB EFX Group, and they pretty much redo Winston's original creature, but, much poorer this time around. There's a decent cast featuring "Hellraiser"'s Andrew Robinson as our star. Linnea Quigley shows up to, and Soleil Moon Frye aka Punky Brewster is here as one of the teens, and as for teens our main a-hole teen leader guy gets a much better death this time around then in the first. Matter a fact there's a lot of good kills here as Pumpkinhead just wrecks everyone. It's no where on the level of the first film, but, its a needlessly fun little b sequel regardless.
  • Crazy high school kids get into something they don't understand and release the soul of Tommy, a boy killed in 1958. Of course, we know who the monster is after, but the Sheriff (Andrew Robinson) is going crazy trying to figure it out.

    And, does the town doctor (blaxploitation star Gloria Hendry) rent a room in the sheriff's house? She sure seems to be there a lot.

    I have to say that the monster was certainly creatively done and provided some gory action. I find the fact that he can respond to the sheriff's pleas to be stretching it a bit.

    Ami Dolenz and Soleil Moon Frye provided enough eye candy to keep viewer interest.
  • Pumpkinhead II is interesting because it succeeds where its predecessor failed and where that one succeeded, this one fails. Pumpkinhead II , contains better acting, a more interesting back story, while at the same time, it is noisier, less stylish and unconvincing in special effects. As a result Pumpkinhead II is no better or worse than Stan Winston's film. It is just another low budget horror which offers some charms for the monster fans.

    Getting a little carried away one night, a group of kids resurrect a body which is buried on the property of the town's fabled witch. As it happens, the body they dig up is deformed boy who in the 1950s was killed by a group of town ruffians. Now with the boy's soul inside him, Pumpkinhead goes after his killers (now middle aged) and his awakeners. As the killings start to occur, Sheriff Braddock tries to piece this whole mystery together amidst an agitated and highly superstitious town. Both Pumpkinhead and the town want to kill each other, whose gonna live?

    I'll give this movie credit for one thing, it increases the monstrosity from the first. Although still far from scary, this monster is far more aggressive than his predecessor, and he kills with great ferocity, clawing, gnawing dismembering his victims. On the negative side, the special effects have fallen a bit. The first Pumpkinhead may have been a slow mover, but his movements were rather fluid, and muscular and like a creature. This one moves like a guy in a suit and is shot from too many bad angles which ruins the scale of the creature.

    If you liked Pumpkinhead, then I don't think you will be too disappointed in this. Maybe as a whole, it is slightly less accomplished than the original. but it's sufficient for a sequel.
  • After the well-crafted production and stylish production of the first "Pumpkinhead", I have to say that this one was extremely disappointing. I can understand its appeal with the gore and violence that far exceeds the first one. Not to mention that it's also more fun than the original, I guess. But I can't say that it's even all that great of a film, much less a sequel.

    The story has absolutely no continuity to the original. In fact, this is not even the same creature that was in the original film. Rather, it's the spirit of a dead boy who was rejected for being seriously deformed- think Rocky from "Mask" (1985). He is evoked from the dead by some teenagers screwing around for a good time.

    What's insulting to me about the movie is that these are just the typical, sex drugs and rock'n'roll kids in all the slasher movies. Whereas in the first Pumpkinhead, there were kids, but they were smart, down-to-earth kids that were looking for a wholesome, good time.

    There were also undying clichés in this film- the busty blonde standing motionless and screaming at the monster's advance, running and tripping repeatedly in the woods and the unavoidable "reasoning with the beast" formula. And they weren't really done with any interesting twists of any kind that might have allowed us to forgive them, either.

    The creature effects, themselves, should have been filmed more sparingly for how much of a step down they were from the original. Granted, this was a made-for-TV movie, but it shows weak cinematography.

    In short, it's a sequel that makes absolutely no sense. It feels rushed and obviously shows itself as far less of a labor of love than the original. Its gratuitous nature can make it fun at times and that's undeniable, but it's missing the real genuine touch that made the original so worthy of being cherished by aficionados of the genre of dark fantasy.
  • quahogq24 June 2000
    This movie rocks! It is even better than the original masterpiece, Pumpkinhead. It has great special FX, a great plot, and excellent atmosphere and direction. The monster Pumpkinhead is portrayed brilliantly here. He is still that wonderful and downright scary demon of vengeance that we knew in the first film, but in Pumkinhead 2, Pumpkinhead is a more sympathetic and interesting character. The human characters here are likeable (with the exception of the Teenagers which were never supposed to be likeable). The acting was rather campy and wooden though, but that's OK. I can apreciate cheese in my movies.

    Bottom line: Pumpkinhead 2 is the best movie EVER made! It must be seen by everyone! 10/10

    P.S.- I wrote a comment for this film before but I don't think it took.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In the late Eighties, special effects wizard Stan Winston (Aliens, the Predator movies, the Terminator trilogy, plus many others) made his movie directing debut with a backwoods horror film called Pumpkinhead. Based on a legend that's existed in rural farmland America for the last couple of centuries, Pumpkinhead told the story of a fearsome, unstoppable demon that can be raised from Hell by those who have been seriously wronged, to wreak out unrelenting vengeance on their behalf (and when I say seriously wronged, I mean seriously. Somebody nicking your parking space or refusing to pay their half of the restaurant bill doesn't cut it).

    Unfortunately the movie suffered from distribution problems, never had a wide release in America and went straight to video in the UK. However, due to it's eerie atmosphere, good performances from it's cast, and the title creature being one of the best and most convincing monsters to ever appear on film, Pumpkinhead became a respected cult movie. So much so that there was a comic book mini-series about the monster published by Dark Horse in the early Nineties, several differently designed models and action figures of Pumpkinhead are still readily available (I own one of them) and in 1994 came the direct-to-video Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings, directed by sequel specialist Jeff Burr.

    The sequel was never released on either VHS or DVD in the UK (although the tie-in computer game was) and to the best of my knowledge it had never been shown on British TV either... until the Sci-Fi channel (UK version, obviously) screened it on 30th December 2006.

    The general consensus on the internet regarding the sequel is that it is - quite simply - complete rubbish. But having finally seen it for myself, I have to disagree. Yes, it's nowhere near as good as the original Pumpkinhead, but Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings is still an entertaining and highly enjoyable monster movie in it's own right. Although the special effects this time were supplied by KNB FX instead of Winston, Pumpkinhead himself is still one cool-looking creature, and his attacks are even more brutal than in the first film: limbs are ripped off, backs broken, a pair of young lovers are both run through with the same metal pole and left pinned to a tree, and one particularly unlikeable character has his head casually plucked off. In a gruesome example of poetic justice, a backwoods hick who's been organising illegal cock fights has his head rammed into a chicken coop, whereupon the terrified birds peck his eyes out and slash his face to ribbons.

    The movie also boasts a great B-list cast. There's a rare heroic leading role for Andrew Robinson (who normally gets typecast as villains) as a small town sheriff, an even rarer speaking role for Kane Hodder (who played Jason Vorhees in four Friday the 13th movies), a cameo appearance by Eighties scream queen supreme Linnea Quigley, a bit part played by R.A. Mihailoff (who'd previously portrayed the title role in Burr's Leatherface: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3), and early Nineties starlets Ami Dolenz and Soleil Moon Frye are among the potential Pumpkinhead fodder.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    (Credit to Parca Mortem on IMDb) After a group of teenagers indirectly cause an old witch to be burned, they accidentally revive Pumpkinhead. This time Pumpkinhead is inhabited by the soul of a deformed orphan killed 30 years before. He goes on a bloody rampage after his tormentors and the teenagers. Meanwhile, a local sheriff tries to solve the mystery and stop the murders.

    I know Pumpkinhead has a lot of fans, but I'm not one of them. I wasn't looking forward to this sequel. With how awful this sequel is, I'll watch the original over this one any day of the week. Not only is it very stupid, but rather dull as well. There were too many random killings as well. We get severed limbs, blood splashes, and more. The monster is really rubbery looking. He wasn't very threatening at all. Amazingly enough, we get a great horror cast. The performances are OK, but almost everyone is unlikable. Ami Dolenz is cute and makes a decent female lead. J. Trevor Edmond annoyed me. It's always fun to see Andrew Robinson in a role, but I disliked his character. I can't forget about the gorgeous, Soleil Moon Frye either.

    If you're gonna watch any of the Pumpkinhead movies, stick with the original. This is followed by two crappy straight to video sequels.

    3.4/10
An error has occured. Please try again.