Add a Review

  • 2905518 December 1998
    Kurt Vonnegut's story turned into an intriguing movie. Not a sci-fi classic but worthy of particular praise for its grim vision of the future. Not a future dominated by machines because man has taught them to evolve (Terminator), nor a future inhabited by docile, lazy epicures who have even lost the ability to read (The Time Machine). This is somewhere in between, a future where the average prevails and where excellence is looked upon with scorn.

    After a second civil war, America's leaders have realised that war is idealistic, so they look to an age where ideology was at its lowest point. The golden age of mass consumerism - the 1950s. Children are taught at school to achieve mediocrity, grade C is best, grade A is very bad. Adults are force fed tv with no stimulating content, and strive to buy the newest durable product they see advertised. All brain patterns are controlled by thought suppressing headbands.

    The premise is marvellous and keeps the viewer hooked. It is darkly comic, but seriously thought provoking. Not brilliantly acted but certainly worth a look.
  • It's easy to imagine Mike Judge's hilarious film "Idiocracy" as a dumbed down version of Kurt Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron". "Harrison Bergeron" is both darkly humorous, and at the same time frightening. This is intelligent science fiction, that extols the belief that mediocrity for everyone should be the goal of society. The government implements control over citizen's brains with electronic headbands. This diabolical system is overseen by Christopher Plummer, one of a few privileged citizens, not controlled by a headband. Sean Astin is Harrison Bergeron, a rebellious intellectual who tries to overthrow the system. The film has dark comedy, an excellent and appropriate soundtrack, and top notch acting. Recommended sci-fi viewing. - MERK
  • This is not the movie to watch right before you trust the government to do something that they say is in your best interest.

    Living some years from now, Harrison Bergeron is a smart young man. So smart, in fact, that he's had to repeat grades, several times. That's because A's are bad, C's are good. Everyone is to be rendered average by a headband that moniters brainwaves and keeps intelligence level to average. Harrison, however, is so smart that the headband does not work for him. Recruited by the government, he learns that people have so much more potential than is allowed. Armed with this new knowledge, he feels compelled to act.

    In a wonderfully hilarious supporting role, Eugene Levy plays the randomly selected president, who has no idea how to lead a country but loves wielding power. His conversations are little sub-gems sprinkled throughout a gem of a movie. This one is well worth the while, though quite disturbing.
  • Even though the film takes place in the future, it is an interesting and frightening look at our own times. It's a combination of 1984 and MATRIX with a 50s-style movie. The fact that we allow ourselves to be told what to think and do is played out in an interesting fashion. The Thoreau-like character sees the facade and learns how to break through. Sean Austin does a great job as the naive innocent who sees into the darkness behind the facade. Christopher Plummer is very effective as the "big brother" who actually has a soul. The film makes us confront the dilemma of whether we want to be "normal" or to be who we really are.
  • SnoopyStyle4 February 2016
    It's 2053 Madison, Rhode Island. The government's mandate is to make everybody average. The world exists in a 1950s Americana. Harrison Bergeron (Sean Astin) has been held back for 3 years in school because he is too smart. Everybody has an electronic headband dampening their intelligence. He gets paired up with the dim-witted Alma in hopes of having more average children. His doctor directs him to a headhouse of smart women. He is especially taken by chess-playing Phillipa. It's a setup and he is taken to the National Administration Center which is really the power behind the government. He is recruited to join.

    I can certainly understand what Kurt Vonnegut is driving at with his short story. However, the movie fails to think through those ideas and stretch it out fully. It's also a little smug deciding what is lowly and what is superior. I find some of the leveling devices a little too jokey. I would prefer this premise taken much more seriously and the story much more intense.
  • I saw this movie on TV one evening, probably even missed the start of it. I had no idea what it was, and it had the familiar TV-movie feel but it also had something compelling which kept my interest so I sat and watched it through.

    I was amazed by this film, partly because of the scope, partly because of the parallels I could see in the world around me (which have only increased since), partly because it was so apparently innocent and unassuming and partly because I had never seen or heard of it before. It took me by surprise. I think I realised shortly after that it was written by the respected Sci-Fi author K.V. and that I should really have read the story sometime. Oh well. You can't catch them all.

    However, much time passed and I forgot the name of the movie (it doesn't exactly stick in the mind) and I forgot which of the famous authors seeded it - but I didn't forget the content. From time to time I would ask somebody 'did you ever see that film...' and always got a blank response. I just remembered the author today and traced the name, which brings me here.

    All I can say is this - watch it, and at the same time think about the last time you watched mainstream television 'entertainment'. If the parallels doesn't make your skin CRAWL, well - put the band back on...
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Based on the 1961 Kurt Vonnegut short story, "Harrison Bergeron" is a made-for-Cable TV movie released on Showtime in 1995. Set in the year 2053, the film presents a dystopian society where equality of intellect is enforced through the use of headbands that "dumb down" the population. The protagonist, Harrison Bergeron, challenges this norm as his exceptional intelligence sets him apart. As the story unfolds, we witness his struggle against a society that demands mediocrity and the control of a hidden elite.

    One of the film's strengths lies in its ability to captivate viewers from the start. The opening shot cleverly juxtaposes 1950s cars with a small town high school, instantly immersing us in a future world. The headbands worn by the students serve as a visual clue to the underlying conflict. These devices, initially seen as harmless accessories, turn out to be instruments of intellectual suppression.

    The narrative explores the aftermath of a world war and the subsequent "second" American revolution, which aimed to establish equality of intellect as a means of preventing future conflicts. Harrison Bergeron emerges as a direct challenge to this societal mandate due to his exceptionally high IQ. The tension escalates when Harrison is subjected to a doctor's attempt to "dumb him down" through headband adjustments and ultimately proposes a lobotomy-like surgery.

    Amidst the seriousness of the film's themes, there are moments of biting satire. One such instance occurs when Harrison visits an illegal "head house" resembling a brothel, where patrons engage in intellectually stimulating discussions instead of physical intimacy. This unexpected twist offers a humorous take on the consequences of enforced mediocrity.

    The plot takes a significant turn as Harrison finds himself in a secret facility controlled by elitists who manipulate the population through mind-numbing TV shows. Christopher Plummer's portrayal of John Klaxon, the leader of this fortress, adds depth and intrigue to the narrative. The revelation that Phillipa, a woman from the head house, is an undercover operative in the facility further complicates Harrison's journey.

    The film effectively explores the concept of a hidden cabal exerting control over the masses, which proves prescient in today's world.

    Harrison Bergeron (the film) is prescient in terms of predicting what is happening today in two major ways.

    First, it is not so much that there is a general "dumbing down" of intellect among the general population, but rather a distinct pressure to conform. A corollary of this is that there is a great deal of shaming going on today toward those who refuse to accept a mainstream medical narrative, which demands a "one size fits all" method of health treatment, such as vaccination, and going against it will lead to ostracization. Technology is utilized directly in the form of those headbands to ensure conformity, just as diagnostic tests today mark everyone as infected or not. To reject diagnostic testing can only lead to branding those who reject them as modern-day heretics.

    Certainly, the idea that there is large-scale brainwashing going on due to the effects of television viewing can be applied to the present time. But the analogy is only true in a general sense. The "brainwashing" is different from the "mindless entertainment" that the elitists were peddling to the dumbed-down population in Harrison Bergeron. Quite the contrary, the information from the current-day media is not "entertainment" but apparent extremely sophisticated propaganda clothed in unproven scientific theories which the general population cannot possibly penetrate (hence the term "trust the science").

    The second way in which the Harrison Bergeron narrative "gets it right" is the positing of the existence of a global elite controlling the masses, utilizing propaganda to instill the notion of the "greater good" as a means of social control. But again, there's a difference between the film and our current situation. The population in the film has no idea they are being controlled by an elite group. But when Harrison makes them aware, no one cares (this is why Harrison ends up in despair and kills himself). Today, the general population is actually aware of an "elite" which they refer to as "the science" and put up on a pedestal. If there is any "dumbing down" going on today, it is more in the realm of trusting "expert opinion," in which there is no desire to ask any questions of those who control the narrative.

    In the climax, Harrison rebels by exposing the secret cabal on live TV, attempting to awaken the general population to their manipulation. However, his efforts prove futile as only a small fraction of viewers notice the anomaly on their screens. The film's comic tone is overshadowed by a tragic ending when Harrison takes his own life, highlighting the despair of his realization.

    It is worth noting that while the film's themes resonate with the present, the specific portrayal of brainwashing and mindless entertainment differs from today's reality. Contemporary media delivers sophisticated propaganda disguised as unproven scientific theories, leading to a lack of critical thinking among the general population.

    Furthermore, Harrison's division between the "creative" and the "uncreative" fails to fully translate to our context. Presently, creativity is encouraged as long as it aligns with the mainstream medical narrative. Those who challenge this narrative find their creative endeavors dismissed, yet the characters lacking appreciation for art in "Bergeron" remain underdeveloped.

    Despite these nuanced differences, "Harrison Bergeron" remains thought-provoking and commendable in its analysis of potential societal trends. By exploring the pressures of conformity and the control wielded by a hidden elite, the film urges viewers to reflect on our own world and the dangers of intellectual suppression.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This has literally been my "favorite movie of all time" ever since a friend rented it for a gathering of geeks. It was made for television, of course, but I believe it was put together far more expertly than most movies I have seen. Aside from a seemingly low budget, some minor inconsistencies, and an occasional poorly-delivered line, the movie is superb. It sets a pace, speaks to a theme, and gives the viewer a story they could believe in.

    Other reviewers here have observed how "Harrison Bergeron" is a political commentary on the conduct of government (especially American government). Others point out the science fiction aspect of intentionally manufacturing a society. I would just like to voice my awareness of a theme that hasn't been spoken to much here-- the theme that is the reason that this is my favorite movie.

    The nature of intelligence, while poorly defined and understood by those who measure it so expertly, is a concept I and many others cannot ignore. For the gifted and talented among us, the world looks much like Harrison's world in the beginning of the film. Intelligent people are often isolated from others by intolerance and by their own unwillingness to conform to mediocrity. The movie sums this up well with a line: "It's lonely, being smart." It would be arrogance to believe that people like Harrison are 'better' than the rest, but it would be foolish to say this difference does not matter. Being different in any way is painful for young people, and even more so when the difference allows someone to more fully comprehend the meaning of it.

    I would never want to be as smart as Harrison Bergeron in a society where excellence was penalized. The American society is not so punitive, but there are certainly costs for being gifted. When federal funding for gifted programs is so quickly siphoned away during budget crises, an intelligent student is not a "child left behind" but is instead a child *kept* behind. What motivation is there to try, to achieve one's potential when more tedious and mind-numbing work is the only reward? Many smart students learn it is better to do just enough to get that "A", or slack off to get even worse, than it is to fight against the inertia of school curricula. At worst, the educational system destroys our brightest minds by teaching them to conform to the standard of the norm.

    When I saw this film, I remembered again the darkest parts of growing up smart in a place where intelligence is a liability. I was smart enough to be anesthetized by my classes, but not smart enough to see right through it all. The secret government of the best and the brightest looks like a utopia to eyes clouded by compliance. It would be comforting to many students to have a place where they did not need to hide their gifts because other people (and teachers) might get resentful. These places need to be re-created in American culture, because they existed once and served an essential purpose. Until recently, universities and laboratories were places of intellectual enlightenment; now they are institutions designed to swell the ranks of the middle class and to make a profit. The result: it is difficult to find groups who are together solving the greatest problems that beset humanity, as was once done.

    So, I enjoy Harrison Bergeron for its humor, political insight, and science (non)fiction, but I appreciate it more for its portrayal of the talented and gifted. These are not happy people-- they are burdened people. If you are one of these people, know that you are not alone. Movies like Harrison Bergeron remind us that there are others who experience the angst, the ennui, and the pain of being uncommonly gifted. Find solace in the world of the geek, or in Mensa, or even just with your special group of friends. Harrison Bergeron is a warning, not a role-model.
  • Having seen the film and red the comments in here, here's what I have to say about Harrison Bergeron: First of all, acting: Sean Astin is the obvious wrong choice for the lead in this TV film. A better choice from within the cast would be his brother Mackenzie, but I guess the perfect Harrison would be Jonathan Brandis as he has eyes that pour out intelligence, the convincing looks that he may be darn intelligent - and even athletic- as Harrison Bergeron is described in the original story. Sean Astin looks too old, too fat, too short for the part and most important of all, he looks as if he is Forrest Gump and it's definitely not what Harrison Bergeron should be represented as. Astin doesn't look smart enough to work at the till at the local supermarket and give the right change to you, never mind masterminding a third American Revolution. The scene when he takes over the broadcasting room and becomes excited about watching and broadcasting all those "gems" of the past is pretty bad and badly acted, but the part when he pretends to conduct an orchestra is, in one word, pathetic. It's the nadir of the film and any scene anytime can't be worse, to my opinion. Miranda de Pencier seemed too old for her role and surely doesn't look at all like the love interest able to create an obsession for someone as smart and (supposedly) cool as Harrison. Christopher Plummer was the best-cast actor, and I can't think of anyone better than him to play Klaxon. Secondly, in terms of dialogue, the script looked too confused to say anything at all: There were too many cheesy, useless dialogues, to the extent of rubbish like "You stupid boy. She was pregnant," as if Harrison's suicide was created by a problem of love, and no, it wasn't. Besides, the education system didn't really convince me at all for most seemed to deliberately forget the answers or answer wrongly to the teacher's questions. Anyone as smart as Harrison should learn in four years in the same class that he should shut up and say "I don't have a clue," instead of telling who did what in the American War of Independence. Besides, he looked as if he repeated stuff he had learned by heart, and it's not what I call smartness. Yet, it's a shortcoming of the Vonnegut story as well as of the film. I didn't bother too much about the now infamous Macaulay Culkin dialogue I red a lot about in the above comments, for I am sick of the fact that anytime someone mentions a film of quality from the 20th century, it must either be Casablanca -which is not credible enough in the year 2000 never mind 2053-, Citizen Kane -which is incomprehensibly boring for most people-, or It's A Wonderful Life. Why can't it be Star Wars, Silent Movie, or Apocalypse Now, for instance, for a change? Or, why should it be Beethoven who creates the immortal music but not Queen with Bohemian Rhapsody? And, if the rulers of the future so refined, why can't we see them wear better clothes than what Chairman Mao would prefer to wear? Why should the people of the future wear dull, grey clothes; work and live in dull, confined, grey spaces which look like the interior of a crowded submarine; and never seem happy or joyful and never make any jokes at all? One day, someone must portray a far different future than this. Overall, I guess Harrison Bergeron is a well-made TV-film, with an emphasis on the words 'TV-film'. The problem is it can't pass for a real movie. It is too crowded with too many ideas so that they are either misrepresented, mis-emphasised or look silly; besides the film looks cheap, it has terrible acting at parts, but it is surprisingly all right to watch most of the time, too. I was far less bored and irritated than I thought I would be, and I believe that's a good point on the film's behalf. Yet, I sincerely hope there will be a better director with more resources and a better cast who will try to remake it sometime, for it's too good a story to be told like this. Finally, after all is said and done, the film may still be considered a success when one compares it to what they've done to Grand-Master Asimov's Bicentennial Man with a big budget and with a star as famous as Robin Williams as its lead.
  • This is one of my favorite movies because it makes you think of the "what if" to the nth degree. It ranks up there in my mind with Matrix in terms of challenging your imagination to think outside the world as we know it. It is too bad it was only a made-for-TV movie because I think it would have done as well at the box office as many movies that are much less interesting have. The movie puts us in the future, where the not-so-intelligent have risen up against the intelligent and forced the government to create a mechanism (a head band) for ensuring that all citizens stay at the same level of intelligence - average. Our main character, Harrison, is, much to his family's dismay, above average and, despite the band, cannot contain his intellectual gifts.
  • I read the Kurt Vonnegut short story "Harrison Bergeron" in the ninth grade, and in the tenth grade we tore it apart from beginning to end. I loved that short story; I found it fascinating, the idea of a civilization where equality exists in its base form, and yet nothing is right. Then I passed by this movie during one of my many continuing stints in a Hollywood video store. I raised my eyebrows in surprise, then furrowed them in disgust, and passed on. You see, book/story-turned-film adaptations and I do not have a pleasant history. But eventually, I broke down. What the hell?

    I was dazzled immediately. Of course, the story Harrison Bergeron, as compared to Sean Astin, is as I said, Drastically Different (with capital letters included). However, he acts the role of the confused Harrison wonderfully. The film is nothing like the short story - the only things they have in common are the name and the base concept. But what the filmakers did with that base concept is extraordinary, very much deserving of the 10/10 stars I rated it with. You cannot argue with a film that answers all of your questions that the book merely skimmed upon, and yet remains true to the story. All of the actors were amazing, and played their roles with amazing vigor. The film was homely; you could connect with these people and these places. It struck me as Oscar-deserving, and it was made for television! Please, if you have read the story and are wary of this picture, don't be. I was, but I broke down, and I'll never regret it. And if you haven't read the story, watch the movie anyway. You'll get it right from the humorous beginning to a near tear-jerker ending.

    Thanks for making a film adaptation that I, for one, could enjoy.
  • I don't know how this movie received so many positive reviews on this site! I'm a big vonnegut fan and am very familiar with the story this Showtime original film bastardized beyond belief, but even if I wasn't, the poor acting, VERY poor casting (Sean Astin as the brilliant, athletic, and all around individual, Harrison?? The guy's completely generic!) and sub-standard writing rendered this tripe barely watchable. Someone pointed out how cute that Maculay Culkin line was. If you read that and thought that was pure comic brilliance (sadly, it probably was the most INTENTIONALLY funny part of the movie), maybe you'll like this movie. But if you're a Vonnegut fan or not completely insane, don't see it. Please.
  • cserpesn21 November 2005
    I saw this movie more than a year ago by chance. I didn't even want to watch it first, but somehow I just got stuck in front of the TV. It was late at night after the Olympics, so i don't think a lot of people saw it. Though I have always loved Sean Astin this movie is certainly a good reason to love him all the more. The "utopia" idea is no new thing in a movie, and usually it's quite interesting how they figure it out eventually. Let's admit: making a good future movie is like walking on eggshells, but I think the cast and crew of this small movie has nothing to be ashamed of. They did really well. It is very impressive how the story of Harrison and of his pure heart and mind talks about life, the equality of men, the lies, the love and of course the arts. I think this movie had become a shiny little secret of the soul of the relatively few people who is lucky enough to have seen it.
  • Bruce Pittman's intelligent and modest TV adaptation of Kurt Vonnegut's short story is a wonderful and much under-appreciated piece of high sci-fi. Films of this kind are rarely made, simply because there's not much potential audience for low-budget science fiction - most people are in sci-fi mainly for special effects and impressive battles. Harrison Bergeron, though, is one of those few adaptations made of real philosophical sci-fi, the kind that creates an image of the future as a reflection of our own reality. And it succeeds quite well in delivering its message, and for what it is it could be enjoyed by almost everyone - though I doubt it could have done well in the theaters.

    The film revolves around two wonderful lead actors - one is Sean Astin, who recently gained success and fame as Sam Gamgee in Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy. The other is the wonderful British actor Christopher Plummer, remembered by sci-fi buffs as the Klingon General Chang from Star Trek 6: The Undiscovered Country. Brilliant comedian Eugene Levy gives an eerily funny performance as the President. The story is of a future America in which equality is achieved by discouraging exceptional talent or intelligence and creating forced mediocrity. Harrison (Sean Astin) is one of the exceptional few whose intelligence surfaces despite the government's best efforts and is therefore given the chance to work for the government. There he discovers the timeless Orwellian truth of Fascist regimes - all are equal, but some are more equal than others. Astin's interplay with Clummer (the classic 'Big Brother') is wonderful, and the ending is beautiful. The script does an excellent job of expanding Vonnegut's very short story into a 100 minute film.

    Harrison Bergeron is well worth watching - if you can get your hands on it. As far as I know there isn't a DVD available, but the VHS can be ordered on Amazon and the movie plays occasionally on television. If you're interested in science fiction literature of authors like Vonnegut, Philip K. Dick, or Isaac Asimov, this wonderful little think-piece is a good purchase.
  • It's been over two years since Ive seen this movie and I can still remember it. the movie was just so mezmerizing, I couldn't stop watching it if I wanted to! I had to know what happened to harry. The movie was able to be depressing and funny at the same time, great tongue and cheek stuff. Its all in how you take it with this film. it can be precieved in so many ways. In short I loved it! this deserves to be a classic.
  • Harrison Bergeron is a movie that illustrates something most people don't realize. People are ignorantly happy entertained and their lives controlled for their "safety." Transgressions against our freedom for better protection against ourselves are consistently voted in. The Bill of Rights has torn apart by democracy and "for the children." In the movie, victimless crimes deserved capital punishment... for the protection of the people.

    The Romans managed a large populace not with armies but with bread and circuses. The people were fed and entertained. Today we have Welfare and TV. Harrison was in control of the all powerful Television... and the minds of the viewers. The average person prefers reruns of "Seinfield" over the Opera. "Wag the Dog" was a perfect example of political control through stimuli and news. Wag the Dog is today, Harrison Bergeron may be tomorrow.

    "Nostalgia by proxy."
  • Harrison B. is a delightfully witty commentary on the constraints placed on the common man by government and sociological ideals. This movie is for the thinking viewer as well as an enjoyable flick to veg out on. Appeals to everyone. The kind of movie that will have you thinking and talking about it days and weeks later. The excellent character development will leave you feeling very understood and perhaps somewhat paranoid. It is an excellent movie with an outstanding performance by Sean Astin. The turmoil Harrison endures as he realizes his life has been one of blind acceptance of the propaganda perpetrated by the 'controllers' is a very profound message. His agony over the truth of what mankind has inflicted upon each other is a lesson well learned by all.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is such a great movie on many levels. I won't take the time to re-cap the story line which all of the reviews here have already done so well, but I didn't want to comment on something that no one else has up until this point.

    First of all, I don't really see this as sci-fi, because it is already happening today- we don't even need the "mind bands" to dumb us down because there is already an insidious growing movement to see diversity squashed and mediocrity rewarded. TV has become a banal wasteland of "reality" shows like Survivor, Lost, American Idol, etc. There is nothing but "empty calories" in these shows (btw, this is not to say that I do not recognize the need for some mindless entertainment at times.) And American Idol has as much to do with uniqueness and diversity as it does with real singing. There was a time when TV did have some thought provoking commentary that was presented in an entertaining way. Examples would be Star Trek or All in the Family. (These are just 2, I could put more here, but I'm on a time constraint to go to work.) Kids AND adults are rewarded everyday for getting 10th place... or last. That's not to say that that person in last place didn't work as hard as the person in first- it's to say that there are "winners" and "losers" in everything - even life, even in the "afterlife" there is heaven and hell. Watch a lame antelope getting tackled by a lion- it happens. In our cerebral (irony) society, we think that we have somehow conquered that idea- that it is benign and kind to want to remove the "sting" of being the last- but life isn't like that. That is an unreality. That "sting," helps to give us as human beings an impetus to strive for things and make things better. This is part of what this movie addresses so well.

    To be honest, my favorite scene is the one in which Plummer's character shows Astin's character Bergeron the DVD of the "cost" of intelligence and uniqueness. He makes a compelling argument that ALMOST convinces the viewer; that somehow, all this diversity is the cause of wars and hate. That if we were just all the same somehow, it would disappear. No more brilliance? No more great music, movies, or art? Maybe, but isn't it worth it if there are no more senseless deaths? But then, perhaps some things are worth dying for. This scene in the movie actually leaves it "open" so the viewer can make their own decision. (Personally, I *need* music and movies and art- I don't think I could live without them.)

    Strangely enough, I always think of the movie/play, "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?" when I think of this movie, because there's one scene in which George makes an off-handed comment about the biologists and how they are the ones that are going to make everyone the same, that there will be no music, poetry and not much learning, but we will have a sublime civilization of men that are all the same. (I'm paraphrasing from memory, so cut me some slack.) He also says, "You take the trouble to construct a civilization, to build a society based on the principles of... of principle. You make government and art and realize that they are, must be, both the same. You bring things to the saddest of all points, to the point where there is something to lose." Well, I think we are at that point already. There is something to lose, and it's our minds and souls.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    (some spoilers below)

    _Harrison Bergeron_ is the film version of Kurt Vonnegut's short story. Set 100 years in the future, it is the story of a young man brimming with intelligence, who unfortunately is born into a society where mediocrity is mandatory. To avoid the problems of envy between human beings, the government forces everyone to wear headbands that interfere with their thought processes, to wear sandbags on their bodies to keep them from being graceful, and to watch TV shows that are completely devoid of anything funny or thought-provoking. Normalcy is the greatest aspiration of most people. But Harrison has more inside of him than anyone knows.

    The brevity of the short story led me to be suspicious when I saw that there was a full-length movie made out of it. I figured it could only smack of screenwriter's license, like those animated series made out of animated movies (how are they going to come up with a whole season's worth of plotlines without violating the canon set up by the original movie?).

    Fortunately, this is the movie that was living in the story the whole time, like the part of the iceberg that was lurking below the surface. The acting is good; although Sean Astin could do with a few more types of facial expressions, he does a good job as the gifted but iconoclastic kid who has grown up idolizing mediocrity, but suddenly finds himself immersed in the joys of the mind and the love of a woman.

    The world sketched by the short story is filled in just the way we knew it had to be (perhaps Vonnegut had a hand in this?). We knew that if there is a law that people must be handicapped by the government so they are like their neighbors, someone had to be in charge--and that someone had to have access to evidence that there was once another way of living. We also knew those people, while intelligent, had to have their own twisted reasons for doing what they do. Lucky us--we get to see all this unfold throughout the movie.

    The image I remember most from the story is that of the gorgeous ballerina, suddenly freed from her sandbagged state of mediocrity, dancing with Harrison in a joyous climax before disaster ensues. We don't see the ballerina in the film (though there is an earlier scene when a dancer's sandbags fall off accidentally), but we do get to see Harrison's inevitable end--and it hits us over the head in much the same way. The climactic scenes take place in the TV studio instead, with Harrison showing the world what they have missed in embracing mediocrity.

    Dialogue is a cut above your average sci fi drama, and one exchange is too cute not to quote:

    Phillipa: Have you been watching the old movies I gave you? Harrison: Yes! They're amazing. Who's that old man in _King Lear_? Phillipa: That's Lear. Harrison: No, the actor... Phillipa: Macauley Culkin. Harrison: Oh, yes.

    Yes, it's the obligatory reference to the time period in which the film was produced...but it's handled with wit.

    In sum, this is that rare movie that is utterly faithful to, but creatively expansive of, its literary source.
  • Quirky, off the wall, and brain-warping. Exactly what you'd expect of a short story by Vonnegut. From the opening credits, which scroll across the screen in all directions with "Lollipop" playing in the background, to the opening scene, in which the time is set as the mid 21st century, but the look is 1950's, this HBO made for TV movie promises to be strange, and it delivers. And it Works. The second American Revolution has occurred. The new government is based on the principal that Not all people are created equal, and it is the government's job to interfere to make them so. To this end, everyone wears headbands that fire random shocks into people's brains to keep them from being too smart. Dancers have lead weights tied to one leg. Football quarterbacks have flashing lights mounted in their helmets to keep them from seeing too well... The goal in life is not to excel, but to be perfectly average. But what happens when one boy's brain is too good for the band? No matter how high they crank the voltage, his brain finds a way to work around it. No matter how hard he tries, Harrison Bergeron keeps getting straight A's in school. A Dark Fairytale packed with wit and satire, you may have to hunt for this one, but it is worth the effort. A good allegory on some of our current social problems. And tame enough younger children if you don't mind them hearing profanity. Not exactly the happy ending, but there is promise of a better future.

    For those of you who are Forever Knight fans, Nigel (Laquois) Bennet has a great role as the doctor...
  • There are many great things about this version on Harrison Burgeron. The aesthetic has become a perfect time capsule for a nostalgic sci look at the 1950s, 1990s and... The future. The lesson in the school about the world wide recession is worrying accurate. It's a shame this gem doesn't get more attention.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Harrison Bergeron is an amazing little 1995 made-for-television film that is underrated and deserves some more respect. I came across it one day and thought it sounded interesting... it was beyond exceptional, especially for a TV movie.

    Harrison lives in a society where every person is equal... right down to their intelligence, brain functions, ideas and activities. The society, an alternate version of the United States, is styled to look like the 1950's (apparently because everybody appeared happy in the 1950's), although the film takes place in the 21st century. Harrison objects to corrective brain surgery that will reduce his intelligence (basically a lobotomy to shut him up). His doctor recommends he go to an illegal secret club for smart people who have intelligent conversations in secret. He meets Phillipa, a girl talented at playing chess, who, during a police infiltration, has him whisked away with her to a corrupt government of intelligent people who have good intentions but end up creating a bad situation.

    The acting was amazing, and it was great to see actors Marc Marut, Marilyn Smith and John Friesen from my favorite childhood movie (TV movie Goosebumps Welcome to Dead House) together in a movie again. The story was compelling, similar to Soylent Green (1973) and Parents (1989). The soundtrack was classic nineties TV movie soundtrack. This movie showcases some of the musicians, activists, filmmakers and authors of the 20th century that this fictional society had forgotten or just never been exposed to. It also shows that there can be no equality with the human race but that it's our differences that should make everyone respect and care about each other, equal or not. It's certainly worth watching, I honestly think everybody should view it at least one time.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Harrison Bergeron" was well worth my rental fee. The story (adapted from the Kurt Vonnegut Jr. story) was outstanding. A darkly comical look at a future that strives for mediocrity. Frankly, I couldn't believe that a film made for TV (albeit Showtime) could be this well done. The story kept you interested throughout, and really made you think. (In a good way, for those of you who just groaned at having to think...)

    The acting did leave something to be desired, but it didn't really detract from the movie. In fact, the acting that I disliked the most was Sean Astin's portrayal of the title role. They probably could have cast someone much better in that role, Astin would have been better suited to one of the bit parts. However, even his performance wasn't bad - it was, ironically enough, mediocre.

    The story is handled so well throughout the film, that even though there isn't much surprise as to what is coming next, you are so interested in the characters and the story that you just have to keep watching.



    Possibly the most poignant moment of the film is when Harrison learns that his effort to start a 3rd revolution has only succeeded in affecting 1.3 percent of the population (give or take a .2 percent margin of error) - showing that people don't really want to strive for excellence and actually prefer mediocrity.

    Although the future the film portrayed strove for mediocrity, this movie was anything but average. I would have given this film a 10 if not for the acting - as it was, it still rated high on my board. A film definitely worth your time.
  • eronavbj26 September 2002
    Ever since the idea of "Political Correctness" became stylish, I've

    warned that it was just the beginning. Such manipulation only

    leads to an increasing loss of individual freedom. It's a stealthy

    process that takes over the political organism the way a cancer

    takes over a physical one. The end result of such a "politically

    correct" process is clearly illustrated in Harrison Bergeron. The

    plot is simple, yet chilling in its display of cavalier inhumanity.

    Watch the movie for its unhidden message; enjoy it for its plot and

    turn of (tragic) events, but above all, learn from it – ideologies such

    as political correctness and its first cousin, affirmative action, are

    inhumane at their foundation, insidious in their progression, and

    decidedly real in their ultimate danger.
An error has occured. Please try again.