Add a Review

  • Yes, the earthquake beam from space (heck, the whole story line and all of the villains too) are totally unbelievable. Frankly, if you can find a "believable" action movie, I have a beach house in Arizona you might want to buy. Yes, the production values were not the finest.

    But -- if you like watching the hero exterminate the bad guys, few do it with the style of Seagal. Like Jet Li (yeah, I am old enough to remember Bruce Lee the original, and Chuck Norris), he is one of the few action heroes who is a real martial arts guy, and he moves so fast and fluidly it is hard for the eye to follow, but fascinating to watch. This is brainless entertainment, full of hilariously cheesy B-movie one-liners you can laugh at ("Assumption is the mother of all f-ups!"), often bad acting, a story line you could describe in one sentence, and zero character development.

    There are worse ways to spend 90 minutes. Believability is for films that take themselves seriously. Seagal is more like stand-up comic straight man meets Aikido ace. At least he handles a handgun like someone who has actually fired one.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    ... Close your eyes and listen to all the explosions and the sound of limbs hitting flesh, and you may be happy. If you OPEN your eyes, however, that's when the implausibilities become much harder to ignore.

    A CD-Rom is crucial in some megalomaniac's plan to extort money and terrorise the world. I've no problem digesting that, I've seen it happen before in the movies; but when said CD is dropped ON A ROCKFACE and left undetected for who knows how long, it still works as it needs to!! Funny that, I don't dare to even put mine on the coffee-table if I want to be able to use it again...

    We see a shot of Seagal's large head within the cross-hairs of a sniper rifle... Game over, Casey? No way, within no time he's hiding under the train and explaining blithely that the bullet just 'grazed' him... However stupidly enjoyable the rest of the film was (and I suppose it has its moments) I could no longer in good conscience cheer for Mr. Ryback, he should have been dead by now, not completely impervious to harm so that he can continue with his rescue mission...

    A train is a poor environment in which to stage skilfully choreographed battles. On the boat you had galleys, walkways, etc; but here everything's a bit cramped. This means we spend a lot of time watching dough-boy (What?! He's a chef, that's all I meant... :-) ) on top of the speeding vessel, making his ungainly way from carriage to carriage... Here's a general rule; as soon as a terrorist so much as peeks their head outside, they're a dead man (or woman). If Seagal ever gets his hands on a baddie, just assume that Stevie wins the day, since a lot of the time things are so poorly directed and edited that it's hard to tell...

    Bogosian playing the 'tech-geek' villain does well. True he can't come close to matching the previous standard of Lee Jones or Busey, but that's to be expected. I have to admit, as hitherto mocking as I've been, that there is still a strangely unaccountable thrill in seeing the big man in black bust up those with shadowy souls... Darkness very much the theme, then. If you can manage to turn off the overhead light of your brain for awhile, then you can still find some entertainment in this as long as you feel your way gently.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    There's a moment in Howard Hawks' congenial Western, "Rio Bravo," in which some bad guys have captured Wayne and are forcing him to trick a deputy into releasing a prisoner. Wayne, in his John Wayneness, has previously rid the world of a passel of evildoers. As they ready themselves, Wayne mutters something expressive of reluctance, and one of the bad guys says, "If it had been up to me, you'd have never got up off the floor. Some of those you killed were friends of mine."

    None of that sentimental crap here. None of the dozen or more heavies is friends with any of the others. Instead, they slap each other around, issue orders, leave each other to bleed out, curse one another, and sacrifice each other without blinking an eye. In one case, I think, they sacrifice one of their own simply because leaving him behind the train would seem untidy.

    And the villains are -- or should be -- the best part of a cartoon movie like this. They LOOK fine, for heavies. They're ugly and/or sinister and all are brutish, though, at times, Steven Seagal dispatches them with such alacrity that we can't register which is which. They're just bodies slumping bloodied to the floor of the speeding train or acrobatically tumbling off a high span bridge. It doesn't matter. They all look as if they should have been strangled with their own placentas. Except for Peter Greene as a subordinate villain. He not only looks the part; he can act too. (Catch him in "The Usual Suspects.")

    Maybe I should mention the plot. Sure, why not? Eric Bogosian is a computer genius who has commandeered a secret satellite that can virtually destroy anything on earth. It can cause subterranean earthquakes or shoot down airplanes or whatever else is required to make the brass at the Pentagon tremble. He wants a billion dollars not to trash the Pentagon -- and he gets it. Oh, and he makes a hundred million on the side by destroying the unpleasant wife of some rich guy. Steven Seagal -- surprise! -- foils the plan and kills all the evildoers.

    Hundreds of people are held hostage aboard the train. Seagal saves them all, except a young couple from the Pentagon who give Bogosian the required passwords rather than have their eyeballs coagulated by a red-hot needle. Besides, they were fornicating, so they deserve being thrown to their deaths, such fraternization being against Pentagon policy.

    I don't know why the other passengers are allowed to survive. Okay, maybe they weren't having unmarried sex with one another. Not as far as we know anyway. But none of them can act. Appearing in an important role, as Katherine Heigl does, and being bereft of talent is a worse sin than fornication in my book. She's young and tender but she looks sassy enough, and she's supposed to be Seagal's niece, so I suppose they let her survive with the others.

    In the Pentagon group -- those guys sweating it out and trying to figure out how to stop Bogosian from destroying the world -- Kurtwood Smith is his reliable self and so is Dale Dye, looking abominably fit in his Navy captain's uniform.

    The direction follows the simplicity of the story. Multiple close ups almost burst out of the screen. For important or unusually witty wisecracks, EXTREME close ups are used. Eric Bogosian never looks at a camera or a computer monitor without the exposure of every pore of his face. You can almost see his pupils dilate when the lights go off at the end of a take.

    Of Steven Seagal, what is left to be said? Mano a mano with skilled martial arts experts leaves him unscathed -- not even breathless -- while his opponent fights dirty, curses violently, and invariably loses and winds up covered with blood. Seagal doesn't even have one of those trickles of blood from the corner of his lips. He can't. He's superhuman, supernatural. When his train crashes head on into another, he can outrun the impact and throw himself onto a helicopter ladder. Yet, I'm not sure he's that bright. There is a CD ROM that makes it possible for Bogosian to control the satellite. Seagal and a sidekick manage to steal it and leave the train. A land pursuit follows because the terrorists need the CD and want it back. Why doesn't Seagal just throw the CD irretrievably into the canyon? Did Superman ever take an IQ test? Inquiring minds want to know.
  • With the overwhelming success of the first Under Siege, it was inevitable that a sequel would be wheeled out before too long. Sure enough here it is, Under Siege 2 – Dark Territory.

    Quite why they bothered with the last subtitle I do not known as it is not readily obvious within the action as to its reference but I digress.

    This time the terrorists and Segal are all clumped together on a train. Basically it's a similar scenario from the first film, complete with the same Admirals, CIA boss etc from the first instalment.

    The weapon of choice this time is a daft satellite weapon controlled by a nutcase and his band of hired mercenaries. The two leading bad guys do however have some wonderful much quotable lines, one in particular I cannot repeat here in print, you will just have to make your own assumption…..

    Once again Segal is on his own with just an annoying sidekick/comedy relief (this time a Porter) for company and again he single handed takes on the non-descript bad guys and duly despatches them one by one as per standard procedure in an effort to stop the weapon, save the train and also save his irritating but nice to look at niece.

    Sadly the quality of the seemingly recycled script is poor and Segal is hopelessly out acted by the two lead bad guys (Eric Bogosian and Everett McGill) who in turn are out acted by the two former Alaskan Railroad GP7 type locomotives hauling the train!!

    Also not helping in my appreciation of this film is the fact that the UK DVD release is badly chopped about and obvious badly done cuts abound throughout. Thankfully an excellent soundtrack from Basil Poledouris saves this film from being just average.
  • First a confession - In a dark little corner of my life which some people incidentally think is all of it, I've got time for the work of Steven Segal. You can scoff but some of the most outright disturbingly entertaining movies of the last ten years read like a roll call of his hits. Hard to Kill, Nico, Under Siege, its sequel of which more in a moment, Half Past Dead, Out for a Kill - the man is a cine-alchemist, turning poor, workman like material into solid gold. This is primarily for two reasons. 1)You must be some kind of crazy genius to forge a career with virtually no personality and 2)He is prepared to go further than most stars in the vanity project stakes, in fact next to Segal people like Bruce Willis, Arnold Schwarzenegger and John Travolta look positively reserved and self-conscious. Under Siege 2 has both of these factors at full strength and in some respects this makes 'Dark Territory' (the sub-title is no understatement) the quintessential Segal Experience. He's been everything from a cop to a University professor (no, seriously) but here the great man reprises his role as Casey Rybeck, an ex-Navy Seal, special ops whathaveyou who jacked it in to pursue a career as a navy chef. In the original Siege and I use the word original purely in the context of first film, Segal saved his ship from terrorists when they threatened to ruin his Japanese rice cakes. In the second version, sorry Installment, Segal is taking his niece, who's very good looking indeed on a Colorado rail journey when its taken over by mercenaries lead by an insane computer genius who plans to destroy Washington using a laser in space. Believe it or not this is almost a Ken Loach set-up in comparison to some of Segal's movies but if you were trying to make the most generic action movie imaginable you'd have a hard time beating this movie. In lesser hands we'd be as dead as one of Rybeck's Poterhouse steaks but Segal the alchemist comes to the rescue and delivers 90 minutes of solid ego-mania and it's a joy to watch. Segal followers will know that when the villains find out who he is and his mêlée of specialist combat tactics (Kick boxing, bomb making, weapons expertise, three Michelin stars) they usually start to panic, all except one head villain, usually no.2 to the main villain (see F.Lee Emery and Michael Caine in On Deadly Ground) who is ill-advisedly confident that he can take our hero in the final reel which of course he doesn't. These scenes show us and reassure Segal that he's one total badass, a man to feared and respected and in case you missed the point Segal's side kick (in this case doubling as black, street talking' comic relief) is there to write it on the blackboard for all the slow kids at the back. Siege has many of these moments in which both Segal's niece and sidekick say things like "I guess he's a hero" and in one terrific moment the aforementioned hired help is told by Segal "oh, you're a hero now?" only to be told "No, man you're the hero!". Willis might have cut in with a quip at this stage but the man with the tan doesn't do jokes or indeed anything except fight and deliver lines in his trademark monotone. Segal's so gloriously vain that he can't even allow himself to be dirtied up over the course of the movie. In Die Hard Willis got beaten, blooded up and shot but not so much as a strand of Segal's hair goes out of place the entire time, the dark jacket remaining in place throughout. This is despite such potential soiling incidents as explosions, armed combat, cliff face hand to hand fighting and leaping out of moving trucks. My favourite scene is the one where the lead heavy thumps Segal in the face during their climatic fight and although he's a bit blooded in that shot by the time he's got up there's barely a scratch on him. What chance does any terrorist stand against that? All that's missing from Dark Territory is a speech of the kind of quality witnessed in the dieing minutes of the aforementioned On Deadly Ground in which the then eco-friendly action hero delivered the monologue that every Greenpeace activist dreams about. So there you have it, if you want to see a one man force of nature at work rent this one out tonight but remember, this isn't even his best - for that you'll be wanting 'Out for a Kill' and only a idiot would refuse an invitation like that.
  • willsgb15 August 2003
    i love this film. its great fun from the off and stands up to its average predecessor in my honest opinion. alright, the effects aren't exactly top notch, and the cliches and obvious acts and outcomes are predictable, but this is meant to be entertainment, its meant to make us gasp, get us hooked and give us some fun to concentrate on for two hours. Steven isn't exactly the worlds best actor but he puts in a decent effort here and the end result is a thoroughly enjoyable, if not epic or memorable, fable about a train thats been hijacked by ex NASA employees with control of a satelite with a powerful laser, on which Casey Riback - Seagal - happens to be traveling on to some funeral, with his niece who isn't a happy bunny. enjoy!
  • This time our hero from Under Siege faces off against terrorists who have hijacked a train and are planning on using a nuclear satellite to zap the Pentagon unless demands of money are met. Once again nobody beats our favorite U.S seal turned cook in the kitchen, or for that matter in the movie. Aside from a few exciting action sequences and the hilariously cheesy one liner "Nobody beats me in the kitchen!" Under Siege 2 ranks a huge disappointment. The main reason is that Seagal is too invincible and that the story is too asinine to even bother following. Also the bad guys this time, while having their moments, pale in comparison to the ones in # 1.

    *1/2 out of 4(Poor)
  • George Segal is gonna conquer some bad guys on a train, who want to destroy the world. YEAH!

    The best B-movies are those which originally were meant to be taken seriously. This is one of those. Everything is ridiculous about it: the acting is mediocre and the dialogues the characters have to say are incredibly dumb, yet unintentionally very funny. Let's not forget the story. Ah, yes the story, I just cant stop laughing right now, having difficulty concentrating on writing this review, because the story is (unintentionally) THAT hilarious, that it becomes enjoyable again. Laughing my head off right now...

    HOWEVER,.... I still do like this movie very much, because the original spirit of "Die Hard", which is the mother of ALL action movies, the spirit of that very same classic, is present as well in Siege 2: namely 1 guy who is gonna conquer all the bad guys. There is something unmistakably attractive and exhilarating about being THE good guy who is gonna come to the rescue. I love this sequal of Siege 2 more than I do the original. Honestly, there is something about the victorious mood of this picture that I really like. Or maybe I just like action on trains...

    A powerful pounding glorious soundtrack is constantly pumping up the scenes, even if George Segal is only walking into a toilet. I love it, I would love to hear marching music every time I went to the toilet. It would make life a lot more fun.

    Siege 2 really is a (hilariously) bad copy of Die Hard, only set on a train this time. But it is still lots of good fun, IF one doesnt make the mistake by taking this movie seriously. Expect a B-movie and enjoy the ride...
  • This was the first action movie I saw which made me sleep. It was completely boring to see Mr face-expressionless Seagal fighting from wagon to wagon and I didn't know where the front of the train is and when we can catch it. The final confrontation was nice and quite well-made but I found ridiculous when Seagal was running out of the falling train quite slowly, just like saying "oh, why should I run faster, it's in the screenplay that I will catch that tiny ladder in the last minute, so I have time". Oh my God. 2 of 10.
  • The first 'Under Siege' film was a classic. No, not in the 'Godfather' or 'Empire Strikes Back' kind of way, but in terms of simple nineties action films to eat popcorn to, it was a classic. And an unexpected one at that. Therefore, a sequel was trotted out in the hope that the second film would catch the audience's attention, too. It didn't. Not that it's that bad.

    Steven Segal plays... well, much the same character he plays in all his films – the no-nonsense, bad-guy-slaughtering, tough-man who gets caught up in all sorts of dangerous situations. This time he just so happens to be on a passenger train heading through America when a load of terrorists hijack it, threatening New York with total destruction thanks to an on-board control to a top secret satellite-weapon.

    The first film was set on a large military destroyer boat. Therefore, when Segal did his thing killing bad-guys, he had a bigger playing field (kind of literally!) to run around in. A boat is a damn sight better setting for an action film where the hero is constantly hiding and on the run from a small army of hired mercenaries. A train is not. He never really seems to hit his stride until the film is practically over.

    Yes, he does his general hiding and stalking of baddies, but the whole affair leaves you wondering how he hasn't been caught by now. The second half does pick up the pace a bit – if you don't mind overlooking the various over-the-topness of it all and general plot holes that come with one man taking down an entire elite army battalion.

    Plus there are less secondary characters for Segal to interact with. His niece is a captive, so she has little to do but kneel down and play the part of 'damsel in distress.' Segal's (train porter) sidekick is annoying and the baddies are kind of over-the-top in a pantomime kind of way.

    Overall, 'Under Siege 2' isn't bad. It just isn't as good as the original and therefore not even nearly as good as all the other mad nineties action blockbusters. If you like action films and you come home late at night and see this is on TV, you may watch it all the way through. It's the kind of film that you can watch while doing other things.
  • Bogey Man15 July 2002
    Geoff Murphy directed this second and so far final entry in the Steven Seagal "series", which began with Andrew Dawis' Under Siege in 1992. This time terrorists don't hijack ship but train full of passengers including the deadly cook Ryback (Seagal) and his niece Sarah. The terrorists are led by madman who was fired from the government in which he invented a military weapon that is used in space. He and his colleagues want now to avenge his firing and all the wrongs, and they demand huge amount of money in order to maintain the peace; the madman has all the equipment in the train to control his deadly invention above and he definitely is willing to use it if he doesn't get the money and co-operation from the helpless government. But he doesn't know Casey "the cook" Ryback is also on the train, and he is pretty p***ed of because his niece is in danger among all the other passengers.

    This film is a routine actioner with the usual "charisma" of Steven Seagal and his fighting abilities. Murphy does his job with talent as a director and there are some great bits of photography, for example the scene where the train is reflected in the lake and there are also some interesting camera angles in the film. The film is also pretty exciting (if not always believable), so I really managed to watch this without any problem, and the fact is that I'm not any fan of Seagal's. Under Siege 2 is very violent and has plenty of gun fights and fist/kicking action and the film is incredibly roughly cut in UK to get the 18 rating. I watched the uncut version and it is raw and violent most of the time, if not as violent as Seagal's most brutal film, Out For Justice.

    Under Siege 2: Dark Territory is nothing special, but still pretty exciting, greatly directed, photographed and staged action film. There are some stupid comic elements and "funny" and irritating one liners, mostly from the bag boy, so without these stupid and usual flaws, this film would be even more noteworthy little actioner. Now it is among many others and makes the same mistakes in this department as many others have made, too. I give this 5/10 and appreciate Geoff Murphy's direction.
  • Steven Seagal reprises his role as a one time SEAL team captain, a counter-terrorist expert who had to rely only on his personal skills in order to survive, and protect the hostages... He happens to be on the Grand Continental passenger train traveling from Denver to L.A... Seagal joins the only family he has, a 'cute kid' named Sarah (Katherine Heigl) after her parents died in a plane crash...

    Seagal has an electrifying screen presence... Seeing him in action is similar to appreciating modern art...

    The train is hijacked by a team of 'ugly men' with guns... Their chief, Travis Dane (Eric Bogosian), is a high-tech mastermind, who fakes his own death in order to gain control of a top-secret nuclear satellite... For this crazy technical genius, technology can be used for beauty or debasement, and 'until you plug it in, you just can't tell.'

    Dane's henchman Penn (Everett McGill) is a soldier of fortune freak, whose relationship with his boss resurfaced during Desert Storm...

    Morris Chestnut's focus is on humor and breath-taking sequences...

    Geoff Murphy's film is incredibly entertaining, combining action, martial arts, and dark sense of humor...
  • Steven Seagall is the hero in this drama as the mysterious one-man gang who takes on a band of terrorists on a passenger train. Eric Bogosian is the top gun of the bad guys, a demented erstwhile government employee who wants to get even with Uncle Sam for what he feels was a wrongful termination of his employment. The plot is far-fetched but the action is plentiful and the film's pace speeds along towards its rather predictable conclusion. The scenes of mayhem and the stunt work are good stuff and Seagall manages to keep out of harm's way with the help of a porter. Morris Chestnut's character plays up the comic relief angle for Seagall but the effect is just okay. Katherine Heigl is the estranged niece of Seagall and the two have an uneasy relationship during the course of the movie.
  • Ok. Decently cool premise, all set up for a Die Hard-like movie. Bond-level supervillain. Otherworldly (literally speaking) superweapon. All fine. But then what? The craftsmanship, or massive lack thereof, ruins it. Special effects are hilariously lousy, ever for mid-90s standards. Cinematography is at film-school level. Continuity is a joke and there are plot holes big enough to have been blasted open by that aforementioned superweapon. As for characters... Steven Seagal basically has one facial expression and that's that. Not much depth, not much to make us like him or root for him. He's just a Terminator-style killing machine popping bad guys and delivering criminally lousy one-liners after each kill - every cliché in the action movie book is there, alright - and there is never any doubt who will come out on top. In short: it wastes its potential, and possibly an hour and a half of your life.
  • This was pretty good actually, despite having some production problems(word has it that they were thinking of bringing Gary Busey's character back from Under Seige I-yeah, right-off the exploding Sub? Not likely...)But anyways, this worked well for me. I enjoyed Seagal, showed a bit of humour here in places, thought the train gave it a decent closed in setting, liked both Kurtwood Smith and Everett McGill doing what they do best. (Smith has played the worried Pentagon staffer before too, about the same way...) My impression of Bogosian was that he was a bit too wired at times in his portrayal but it worked just the same. Overall an enjoyable if not great action film, the sort Seagal should have made more of.

    **1/2 outta ****, nothing great, but alright.
  • thesar-219 June 2009
    Warning: Spoilers
    When 'Under Siege 2: Dark Territory' first came out in 1995, I really liked it. Or, I should say, just simply enjoyed it. It was simple fun, and yes, another shameless 'Die Hard on a (fill in the blank)' rip-off. This time, a train. This is my first viewing since; 14 years later. Though, somewhat ashamed of liking such a bad flick and even considering removing it from my guilty pleasure top ten list. But, I will say the villain, played by Bogosian, was highly entertaining and funny and did better than his role even required of him. Tommy Lee Jones (his counterpart from the original,) he is not. Still, he made his scenes more enjoyable. In addition, I am not a Seagal fan whatsoever, however, comparatively speaking, he's the best of the low-budget clones he mirrored in the 80/90s: Van Damme, Lundgren, Norris, etc. After a plane crash kills his brother, ex-seal Seagal escorts his last living relative (surprisingly played by a very young Katherine Heigl – my, she's come far since) across country on, get this, the very same train terrorist "siege" to get back at the government and make money in the process. Speaking earlier of copying 'Die Hard,' you want the same bad-guy premise but in a 100x better flick, rent 'Live Free or Die Hard.' Anyways, suffice to say, Seagal spends his time up and down the train, on top of it, or on a cliff to save his niece and other faceless hostages while cooking up exploding gadgets and even picking up the most clichéd black wisecracking sidekick along the way. Part one made some money, over $150 million worldwide, so why did they strip this of any budget? It was almost embarrassing to see the fake exterior shots when they're inside the moving train.
  • The first "Under Siege" movie is a pretty much overrated one. I mean, it's not that's a bad genre movie but it's a very well known one all over the world and quite frankly I don't see how it deserved this status, since it's a very average action flick in every regard. This movie is basically more of the same. "Under Siege 2: Dark Territory" is just a big clone of "Die Hard" as the first "Under Siege" movie was. The story is also pretty much the same as in the first movie. It's as if they picked up the script from the first movie and simply just changed the settings and characters names.

    Still I liked this movie just a tad bit more than the first movie. It's hard to say why, since this movie is probably a worse directed one than the first movie was. Yet I feel that this movie is more entertaining to watch and has more re-watchable values in it.

    I remember that back in 1995, at the time of the release of this movie, this movie was really a big thing. It had a big budget and the action was amazing for its time. Now days the movie is already starting to look outdated. The action directing is clumsy at times and the early special-effects and obvious miniature effects are awful to watch.

    Yet the movie is a very enjoyable one, especially for the fans of the action genre. Because of the simple premise and story of the movie it's such a pleasant one to watch. Also if you've already seen the first movie you already exactly know what to expect when watching this movie. The violence in this movie is pretty straight-forward. It's the sort of movie that isn't afraid to kill innocent people without mercy. The action scenes are also quite good, despite the not so great directing of it all.

    Yet the movie still makes some horrible mistakes. Such as giving Steven Seagal way too many lines. But I guess that is what happens when your lead actor is also one of the producers of the movie. Secondly the putted too many unnecessary characters into the movie. Bobby Zachs (Morris Chestnut) and Sarah Ryback Katherine Heigl) should had been left out of the movie. They add nothing to little to the movie and often are only distracting and borderline annoying. Also the villains are not too well balanced out. At times you're wondering throughout the movie who actually is the main villain. There are three candidates, that at several moments throughout the movie are being presented as the biggest villain. First in the movie there is Peter Greene, than Eric Bogosian shows up and in the end there is Everett McGill.

    Oh well, at least it were still the villains that made this movie a pleasant one to watch. Eric Bogosian really seemed to have a good time playing the bad guy and he plays a fine and humor filled role, without loosing too much of his credibility as a villain.

    If you liked the first "Under Siege" movie then there is no reason why you shouldn't like this one as well.

    6/10

    http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
  • DKosty12323 November 2019
    Warning: Spoilers
    I like action, I like trains, and I like Rymans character. The trouble here is the action and realims get too far stretched. Granted Katherine Heigel as a young teenager can get a little attention. The villian is kind of stupid. In fact the only time I can recall a stupider criminal is when I was in Suddenly.

    It seems this gang is kind of elaborate when all they want is money. I mean the goal to threaten to kill everybody should be more than that, as they have no real plan to take over the world. Where's the true fanantic when you need one?

    Our hero Ryman, just happenes onto a train with his niece for a vacation trip where these fools take over the train, take everybody hostage, and then try to screw up the national defense of the United states. Meanwhile, Rymans former students just happen to be working for the bad guy. This movie is kind of like a Ford Edsel, the looks of it are good, but the guts don't quite sell.

    There's more than a few problems with it, but if you put away your brain and rmember Ryman has a steel plate in his head that deflects bullets and a criminal that doesn't know what a bullet will do to a CD ROM, you can enjoy some of the rest.
  • This movie was all right for the most part, but in the end becomes the typical Steven Seagal movie with the only major difference being he is actually reprising his role as the cook from the first "Under Siege". And the only carryover from that film is the fact he is supposed to be the same guy and cook. Part of the reason this one just did not have what the first film had is partly the no name cast aside from Seagal. The first film had a nice assortment of actors like Tommy Lee Jones and Gary Busey as the bad guys. It also had a very attractive sidekick for Seagal in that film in the form of a stripper that popped out of a cake. Here he is teamed up with some other dude and I think his niece, so decidedly a step down in the sidekick department. Here some computer terrorist type has hijacked a train and is planning something sinister, of course. He also has a bunch of military type nut jobs at his disposal. Well guess who is on the train, yes the cook from the first film and of course he is going to make things very hard on the bad guys. The action is okay and the film is not bad at all, just has a been there done that feel to it. Though these days almost all films have that same feel to it. So all in all it passes the time okay and is not boring and you get to see Seagal kick butt per the usual in his movies.
  • Surprisingly, 'Under Siege 2: Dark Territory (1995)' is better than the first film. Seagal isn't any better, but the flick itself seems to have a better understanding of what it is. As such, the thing is a lot more fun. It's basically the same thing as its predecessor: our heroic chef carves his way through a series of terrorists aboard a moving vehicle. There are several enjoyable set-pieces, side-characters and acting choices, making for an intermittently entertaining experience meant to be forgotten as soon as its credits roll. That may sound like faint praise - and it is - but the picture really isn't bad. Although it feels derivative, it works well enough for what it is. It's not the best thing in the world (in fact, it's far from it), but it isn't the worst either. 5/10
  • This film is one of Steven Seagal's best and has all the elements of a Bond film: a driven hero, a villain brilliantly played by Eric Bogosian, and a hard-hitting assassin played by Everett McGill. Beauty is respected as a formula that ensures success and the action sequences are precisely dosed by Geoff Murphi, who here offers his best film. What is most surprising is that despite having had many successful films Steven Seagal chose the path of destroying his career with questionable products that instead of entertaining had other objectives. It is a film that does not lose its validity and that is enjoyable. This same recipe was the one that ensured the success of Kingsman and other sagas. We must never forget history if we want to make money.
  • „Under siege 2 " is a totally over the top, totally unbelievable yet highly entertaining sequel to Seagal's best movie. Objectively if you compare it to the original it's a disappointment . The story is pretty much a copy of the first movie with small changes. It's also unrealistic and dumb in places. Despite it's faults it's still an entertaining movie.

    What we have here is basically "Die hard on train". The train itself is a good location. There is lot of pretty scenery and since the train is in constant motion the movie is also fast paced. I had problems with Geoff Murphy's direction in "Young guns 2" . Here he directs "US 2" with formidable energy. The movie is edited very quickly, almost like a music video. Speaking of music Basil Poledouris score is far superior than Gary Chang's from first movie. It's one of best soundtracks for action movie ever made. The special effects are adorably cheesy and add to the overall campy entertainment value. The script has some quotable one-liners : "Nobody beats me in the kitchen" , "Chance favors the prepared mind" , "Guess I'm not trained for this...".

    There is lot of cool train action here (on the train , under the train , in the train) . Every bad guy is dispatched with minimum of effort as no-one is anywhere near as hard as Casey Ryback . Broken bones, severed limbs, terrorists in agonizing pain … This movie has an obvious comic book feeling to it and I really liked the non stop carnage. They just don't make them like this anymore. Steven Seagal is basically invincible here. He gets shot , but the movie quickly forgets about it. His doing unbelievable stuff without breaking a sweat . "US 2" it does stretch reality to the breaking point and beyond, but it can be forgiven.

    Steven Seagal was forced to do this movie after the failure of his very personal movie "On deadly ground" . There is even an unused footage from "ODG" here . Seagal doesn't even try to act here. His obviously unhappy that his making this movie and more stiff than usual. There is a damsel in distress here- Ryback's niece Sarah played by Katherine Hiegl who is a good eye candy and nothing more. Seagal also gets a sidekick - naive porter Bobby Zachs played nicely by Morris Chestnut.

    The movie belongs to Eric Bogosian as crazed computer genius Travis Dane and menacing Everett McGill as Penn. There is veteran supporting actor Jonathan Banks ("Beverly hills cop") in small role of terrorist. Watch out for Kurtwood Smith ("Robocop") as a US general (too bad they didn't used him as a villain).

    Idiotic , yet fun movie full of testosterone. Best cheap thrills you can find. I give it 5/10.
  • The best Steven Seagal movie to date. This is the second, and apparently the last, in the series in which Seagal plays Casey Ryback, an ex-Navy SEAL Captain, who, as explained in Under Siege, was demoted for punching out a superior for poor intelligence which got many of his men killed. In Under Siege 2, his character has been promoted from Chief to Lieutenant, although we only find that out in the end.

    Unlike some of his earlier movies in which Seagal fights for causes, specifically liberal environmental issues, here Seagal is fighting strictly for family and Country. The first scene starts off with Seagal making his appearance in civilian clothes to dramatic music. We learn the grim news that his character's only brother and sister-in-law were killed in a plane crash, leaving his only relative, a niece, still alive. He accompanies the teenager on a train ride from Denver to LA. He has the bad luck, but good for his Country, to be on the train that is attacked by terrorists bent on destroying Washington, D.C., and the US eastern coast for profit only. The maniacal would-be killer of millions is character Travis Dane, recently fired by a Government agency. The terrorist method is a high-tech powerful new weapon orbiting the earth and the train moving through lonely mountains provides the screen, as in "Dark Territory". Seagal seems somewhat lucky to avoid being killed early on, but then becomes a locomotive of destruction for the bad guys. Andy Romano returns as the full admiral, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and provides a continuity from the first Under Siege movie. This is all action showing Seagal as a dedicated and deadly force of protection for the train hostages and the citizens to the east. The action moves, and some of the death blows are right out of the military manual. Watchable over and over and still exciting.
  • It's a Steven Segal, so to ridicule its story or acting or character development is completely pointless. You know its story is going to be predictable and lame, you know the majority of the acting will make you laugh when its not meant to, and you won't cry because any of the characters achieved enlightenment. No, you watch this type of film solely for the sake of how Segal will dispose of the antagonists. This film makes you wait a bit, but once the action starts it's pretty good and Segal does what he's known for- kicking ass! However, as with most of his works, I'm disappointed because it felt too easy. Eric Bogosian is enjoyably insane and sarcastic, but Patrick Kilpatrick looked like a bad ass who actually might give our hero a run for his money. Nope, he takes him apart with moderate ease, making the final climatic one-on-one battle a complete waste. I mean Segal just looks way to clean and unruffled by the climax. Didn't he get sniped in the arm? you would think he might struggle a bit with a wound like that, but naw, he beats ass regardless. An idiotic yet fun movie I recommend for a day you have nothing better to do.
  • kosmasp23 February 2021
    What the movie is trying to tell us: Never get on anything that Steven Seagal is travelling with ... first it was the Submarine, now it's the train ... good thing he never took the bus, right? All kidding aside this gives people that don't expect much ... exactly what they crave for. Some interesting casting choices may help enjoy this too.

    Overall though this is a dud - no pun intended. If that is remotely possible. Steven Seagal again showing no hint of any human emotion - but we know that already. Unfortunately we don't have the bad guy charisma we had in the first movie. Ryback (Seagals character name) just happens to be at the right (wrong?) place at the right (wrong?) time again. Not to mention that he seems to know the landscape so well that he doesn't have an issue chasing the traing at one point ... while Fast & Furious had scenes that were beyong belief, this has not the ridiculous fun factor they or other movies of that kind had ... Suspending your disbelief might just not be enough
An error has occured. Please try again.