User Reviews (72)

Add a Review

  • Michael Caine gives one of his greatest performances, and that really is saying something. How many times have you seen someone overshadow CJck Nicholson? Well it happens here. Caine's character is at times pathetic, at others funny, and at others deeply nasty, and always believable.

    Jennifer Lopez looks astonishing in this but her character is a cypher. The script is so-so, as is the direction, but it is worth watching once for the Caine masterclass.
  • In Blood and Wine, Jack Nicholson plays the likable antihero he plays so well. He's married to Judy Davis, but is having an affair with Jennifer Lopez, and although he seems like a respectable wine merchant on the surface, he's actually planning to steal a diamond necklace from one of his clients, with the help of his partner Michael Caine. But, since it's Jack Nicholson, we forgive him.

    Blood and Wine isn't your typical heist movie, because there are more elements to the plot than just the robbery. There are family tensions, a love triangle, and character development, which helps make this a highly enjoyable movie to watch. When you care about the characters, you care about the movie. The performances are very good, and Alison Cross's and Nick Villiers's script is pretty riveting.

    So often in films, the actors who play children don't even think to adopt the mannerisms and inflections of the actors who are playing their parents. In real life, you can see an enormous amount of similarities through the generations, from gait to speech pattern to the frequency and timing of brow raises, to the tiniest of facial expressions. Stephen Dorff, while playing Jack Nicholson's stepson, took the time to do his homework. When he speaks, it's clear he grew up in an environment where Jack's mannerisms were influential. He's not giving a Jack Nicholson impression, though, and that subtle distinction makes all the difference in the world.
  • In Miami, Alex Gates (Jack Nicholson) is a small trader of wines, married with Suzanne (Judy Davies). He does not have a good relationship with his wife and his stepson, Jason (Stephen Dorff). Alex has a Cuban mistress, Gabriela (Jennifer Lopez). One day, he decides to steal a jewel from a rich client, in the house where Gabriela works as a nanny. Alex associates to the tuberculous small-time crook Victor Spansky (Michael Caine). A series of mistakes jeopardize the heist and the selling of the necklace. This amoral and noir movie has a magnificent cast. However, something does not work well, being just an average movie about greed. My vote is six.

    Title (Brazil): "Sangue e Vinho" ("Blood and Wine")
  • Jack Nicholson is typically brilliant. Judy Davis is positively compelling. Michael Caine does what he does when given a great script: exceptional work. Stephen Dorff is a great young actor, and Jennifer Lopez is stunningly beautiful, if at times out of her league here.

    The script is good, the direction is excellent, and the film, in total, is a solid 8.5 on the 10 scale. Those who complain that the film is too violent shouldn't watch movies about crime. Crime is typically violent. (Despite the way it's depicted in most films.)

    See this movie. Ignore the idiots.
  • rupie8 July 1999
    This is a pretty good suspense/crime/intrigue flick about a jewelry heist gone terribly awry. The big draw here is Jack Nicholson and Michael Caine, working together, for the first time, I believe. They provide two nicely contrasted portraits in malice: Nicholson as a two-bit hood with a connoisseur's taste and delusions of grandeur, down on his luck, and Michael Caine as a grimly desperate safecracker with advanced respiratory disease who feels the grim reaper at his heels and wants one last big score. Their plans are set askew by Nicholson's wife and stepson, leading to nasty complications. Nicholson and Caine are great together, especially the latter. Worth a see.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Bob Rafelson and Jack Nicholson supported each others careers in the 70s with movies like 'The king of Marvin gardens' and 'Five easy pieces'. 'Blood and wine' was the third part in the trilogy. Rafelson's movies were very unique in their own way with Nicholson. His movies were very highly focused on relationships and this formed the core in every movie. In 'Blood and wine' Nicholson is playing the father and son and again delivers another fantastic performance. Regardless of the role, Nicholson is always in top form and most times has the ability carry the movie independently. The noir atmosphere is not continuously present in the movie. The theme of betrayal, greed and loyalty is common to all in this genre and the movie covers this field on a large scale. The only noir factor that missing is the femme fa tale element. However this does not take away any charm from the movie. Many intriguing and suspenseful moments are directed in a unique way that makes the movie's routine theme appear eye capturing. In the initial phase of the movie one would immediately assume that this is a heist movie. However the second half dispels all doubts.

    The basic theme revolves around the theft of a expensive diamond necklace and how bitter relations leads the characters in to a game of cat and mouse. The character interactions in the second half progresses the movie steadily and there is never a irrelevant segment. In terms of plot, the writer (Nick Viltues) has accomplished some good writing but many criticised the movie for it's lack of character depth and even for it's climax. In my opinion only on a re watch the movie's real quality can be appreciated. If one views the movie with concentration and focus, he/she will realise that the u.s.p of the movie is in the performances and dialogues. 'Blood and wine' is not a classic but truly a milestone for introducing the noir genre in to the nineties. Later movies like 'U Turn' and 'Lost Highway' followed.

    SPOILERS AHEAD Nicholson plays a wine merchant who is having a bitter relationship with his wife (Davis) and son (Dorff). His neglecting attitude has created a rift in relations in the household. He and Caine who plays a ageing safe-cracker on parole plan to steal a expensive necklace from the a rich family's residence while they are on vacation. They aim to achieve to do this with the help of a maid played by (Lopez). On the day they plan to steal they discover the maid has lost her job, however with a little inconvenience the pair still manage to get their hands on the necklace. Nicholson plans to travel to New York to sale it for a good price. He books a flight with Lopez who he is having an affair with. Unfortunately his wife discovers this which leads to a brawl and Nicholson becomes unconscious. Dorff arrives on the scene and him and his mother escape. Later Nicholson awakes and finds out that they took the suitcase that the necklace was hidden in. Him and Caine try to locate the mother and son but a high speed pursuit turns nasty which leads to the death of Dorff's mother. After this Dorff decides to get revenge with genius methods. He pits Caine against Nicholson and attempts to lure Nicholson with the necklace with the aid of Lopez. END OF SPOILERS

    For a small thriller the movie extracts brilliant performances from all involved. This element is the core of the movie and brings out life from a routine script. Plot twists are at a minimum however this does not deters ones' enjoyment from the movie. Every clever surprising plot development that occurs happens to the viewer's attention. Bob Rafelson's direction is standard and is in tone with the movies theme. Many close up shots of the character's faces are mesmerising. It captures feelings and emotions very realistically. Florida has become a common setting for movies of this nature. Body Heat, Palmetto and Wild things too used this location. This is another highlight for the movie but many scenes are shot indoors so outdoor scenery is restricted to a certain extent. The background score is very thin. It is not used at every point. Music is incorporated at moments when it can feel most effective with the scene.

    This was the first time pairing of Micheal Caine and Jack Nicholson. They are legends in their own right and make the movie worthy of watching whenever they appear on screen together. Their interactions and witticism are a highlight in the movie. Nicholson impresses in a negative role. This is something that he very renowned for. Stephen Dorff is commendable in the second half as his involvement is greater. He was an upcoming star and his facial and emotional expressions are on the mark. Jennifer Lopez was at the early stages of her career with this small role but her role serves it's purpose at the very end. Her Cuban accent attempt is was very charming.

    For those that enjoy cinema with a distinctive noir taste, this is highly recommended as performances are impressive.
  • KyleFurr214 September 2005
    This movie tries to be a modern day film noir and just quite doesn't work. This was directed by Bob Rafelson, who also directed Nicholson in his first great starring role in Five Easy Pieces. This movie has a great cast that has Nicholson, Michael Caine, Judy Davis, Jennifer Lopez and Stephen Dorff. Nicholson owns a wine cellar but is having some money troubles and hatches a plan with Michael Caine to steal a million dollar necklace while some rich clients are on vacation. Lopez plays their maid who is going to help them but is fired right before the robbery and can't help them. Once they actually steal the necklace, everything starts to go wrong and everybody turns on everyone. This movie just doesn't work as a film noir and is just a major disappointment
  • This was a nice little heist yarn. Nothing special or spectacular, but still an enjoyable viewing.

    I really enjoyed the role that Michael Caine played. His character was creepy and vulnerable at the same time. Caine played it exceptionally well. In fact, Caine's acting was the best part of the movie.

    I'll rate this movie a solid 7. Not a masterpeice, but still an enjoyable view.
  • With the talent on board, Jack Nicholson, Michael Cane, Jennifer Lopez, and Stephen Dorff, "Blood and Wine" must be regarded as a misfire. The film seems strangely detached, with no real involvement for the audience. Jennife Lopez especially comes across as if she wasn't sure how to present herself. What you get are domestic disputes, disappearing diamonds, and disagreements among thieves, none of which are particularly interesting. Even the heist is depicted as an afterthought. With no likable characters, a script that seems underdeveloped, and little reason for the viewer to care about any of this, everything just sort of drifts along to nowhere. - MERK
  • An extremely downbeat, character-driven drama about two losers rather than strictly a crime film that reunites Jack Nicholson with director Bob Rafelson and teams him with Michael Caine.

    It's quite witty in places (as when Caine says of his appalling dye job, "I don't have an ego. Just so long as I don't match my mugshots"); and Judy Davis is a vivid presence as usual as Nicholson's drunken wreck of a wife.
  • Imnozy3 January 2003
    I watched this movie on the basis of the cast alone - how could something with Jack Nicholson, Michael Caine & Judy Davis in the cast be other than brilliant? The answer, if this is an example-is "easily".

    The plot is convoluted, unbelievable, the acting patchy and in the case of Davis - drastically overplayed. Michael Caine once again proved what a versatile actor he is, but was stumped by the stupid storyline. Jack Nicholson did what he increasingly seems to do these days - just drifted through the role (I had the impression he could hardly wait to go home and get the whole thing over). Stephen Dorff did his best with a part that never really defined itself - Jennifer Lopes should not give up her day job - no further comment!

    I feel that the writers and producers should have watched some of the excellent heist movies from the past and learnt the lesson that it is OK to have a convoluted plot as long as you keep the action going.

    A waste of time and talent.
  • gbheron7 September 2002
    Jack Nicholson and Michael Caine are so good in this movie. The temptation to chew up the scenery must have been overwhelming, but neither did. Neither grandstanded, and each played their vastly unappealing characters right down to the last detail.

    Caine plays an aging and ill thief looking for that last big score on which he can retire. Nicholson plays a middle-class wine distributor locked into an unhappy marriage, failing business, and a young girlfriend to support. They unite to rob one of Nicholson's clients, an act they feel will solve all of their problems. Of course it doesn't and everything that can go wrong, does. And then things begin to turn ugly.

    Dark, noirish, this is not a feel-good caper flick. It's definitely not "The Sting". What it is is well acted, directed, and filmed. Highly recommended, I'm just puzzled why it was overlooked at the Academy Awards.
  • dexter-312 February 2000
    "Blood and Wine" is a very pleasant surprise. The reviews by "J-Crew" and "Robert Ruplenas" are dead on. This film is well-acted, as Nicholson nicely underplays his role here. All of the characters are complex and behave as one might expect in real life (i.e. no one is truly good or, for the most part, truly evil), the scenery is great (yes, including Jennifer Lopez), and the tried and true cliches are kept at a minimum. There are a few issues with the heist and the ultimate confrontation between the principals, but overall this is the best work from Rafelson since "Mountains of the Moon."

    A "7." Highly recommended...
  • Considering its cast, ""Blood ands Wine" is a disappointment. It mixes in some overly familiar ingredients (stolen jewelry, betrayal between crime partners, bloody violence), and the final result comes off as extremely cliched and unoriginal. Jack Nicholson looks vaguely bored, while Michael Caine gives a mediocre (by his high standards) performance.

    This isn't an unwatchable film by any means, and it does include its share of surprises, but on the whole it's really nothing special.
  • Another twist on the heist gone wrong movie. Alex (Nicholson) and Victor (Caine) plan to rob jewels from a house safe. The robbery goes off fine but Alex's wife leaves him and flees the abusive relationship with her son Jason (Dorff) accidentally taking the jewels. Alex and Victor give chase leading to a double-crossing finale of greed and deception.

    This is not what it appears - to compare it to the many "heist gone wrong" movies around now is quite unfair. Rather, this is a character driven piece where the diamonds become the signpost to the characters' true form rather than the reason d'eitre for the whole film. Nicholson plays the main character who seems OK on the surface but is paranoid, greedy, abusive and frustrated underneath. Caine is more sleazy and obviously violent, while Lopez, Dorff and Davis all play supposed innocents sucked into the crime.

    However the truth is that the film reveals the greed inside each of them, only Judy Davis as Nicholson's wife comes off as anyway sympathetic, but even she has a drinking problem. Lopez and Dorff display their greed gradually and their characters develop during the film to be as unpleasant as Nicholson. All the main performances are strong and the monstrous sides of their nature are easily believable. Any redemptions are tarnished with lingering greed, greed turns to suspicion turns to deception turns to murder. Human nature is an ugly thing and this element of it is played out at every level here.

    As a crime thriller it doesn't work as well as it could have - it is often treated as a plot driver rather than the plot itself. However the characters and performances are all strong and it is this that drives the film. Depending on whether you want a crime thriller or a character piece with big names, you'll either be disappointed or pleasantly surprised.
  • Director Bob Rafelson ("Five Easy Pieces" 1970, "Postman Always Rings Twice, The" 1981) teamed up once again with Jack Nicholson in the lead, with steady and enduring veterans Michael Caine and Judy Davis, along with a brilliant, faceted performance from Jennifer Lopez, and a gritty, sharp one from Stephen Dorff.

    It's a complex thriller drama, one-upmanship at every turn. Who will be the winner and get the goods? This one sure keep you guessing - or, you're so caught up in all the intrigues that you have no time to second guess them.

    It's probably a "TORV" (tastier on repeat viewing) - a category I came up with as I realized many a film somehow belongs. I may not immediately appreciate the film on first viewing, yet when I get to see it again, such are the case with Curtis Hanson's "Wonder Boys" 2000, and Ang Lee's "Ice Storm, The" 1997, I actually sat through them with higher interest, and yes, knowing the plot already, I found myself watching the nuances of plotline and acting delivered more closely. "Blood and Wine", on repeat viewing, felt much juicier than I first saw it in the theater.

    If you like a dark film noir thriller, one that's for mature audiences (vs. lightweight fanciful intrigue as John McNaughton's "Wild Things" 1998 with Kevin Bacon, Matt Dillon, Neve Campbell and Denise Richards), try "Blood and Wine."

    There's another worthwhile mature thriller, written and directed by Britain's Simon Moore, "Under Suspicion" 1992, with Liam Neeson (as Tony Aaron, a not so successful cop turned private eye) and Laura San Giacomo (as Angeline, the mysterious mistress of a rich dead man). It's a clever whodunit in a rather subtle way. Possibly keeps you guessing even after you left the theater or finished viewing the film. (Ha, another candidate for TORV.)

    ["TORV" - copyright 2001 Ruby Liang, ruby_fff]
  • Blood and Wine is directed by Bob Rafelson and Rafelson co-writes the screenplay with Nick Villiers and Alison Cross. It stars Jack Nicholson, Stephen Dorff, Jennifer Lopez, Judy Davis and Michael Caine. Music is by Michal Lorenc and cinematography by Newton Thomas Sigel.

    A failed father and husband enlists an oily accomplice to enact the theft of a precious necklace. But when his wife and son get involved in the shady dealings, things quickly spiral out of control.

    Bob Rafelson once again turns to his muse, Nicholson, to bring about another venture down the neo-noir lane. Unfortunately, just like the "The Postman Always Rings Twice" remake and "Black Widow", this also flatters to deceive.

    Nothing wrong with the acting or story as such, Nicholson and Caine bounce off each other with scummy character glee, while Lopez and Dorff offer up some sexy sizzle in the supporting slots. In true noir fashion the pic is ripe with unlikable characters, while the vagaries of noirville fate comes into play. Yet as it plays out more as a character study than anything edgy or thrilling, it ends up being like a fine wine that has been corked.

    Some nifty complexities in the narrative and the fine perfs ensure it's above average, but really it's not a must see for the noir faithful. 6/10
  • Alex Gates (Jack Nicholson) neglects his stepson Jason (Stephen Dorff) and his wife Suzanne (Judy Davis). Alex is a wine dealer heavily in debt. Jason would rather fish with his friend Henry (Harold Perrineau Jr.) than work with his stepfather. Alex is looking to steal a diamond necklace from his customer the Reeses with the help of safecracker partner Victor (Michael Caine) and his mistress Gabriela (Jennifer Lopez) who is the Reeses' maid.

    This is a great cast with a good performance from Caine. Director Bob Rafelson doesn't inject enough style to match the noir style story. The cinematic style is pedestrian. His better earlier work is not surpassed. The scheme is not the best. Alex and Gabriela would be the obvious prime suspect especially with the security guards. Only Victor seems to be doing any thinking. However if Alex is ever caught, he'd probably give up Victor quickly. The plan seems ill-conceived but I'm willing to accept the desperate robbers' stupidity. The movie is limited but has good enough tension and great actors. For a movie with Lopez, this could have been sexier. It could have been better in many ways.
  • Alex Gates (Jack Nicholson) is a wine merchant that is not exactly a family man: he distanced from his alcoholic wife Suzanne and his stepson Jason (Stephen Dorff). In debt he decides to steal a valuable diamond necklace from the Reese mansion where his Cuban mistress Gabriela (Jennifer Lopez) works. The day of the heist Alex and his partner in crime Victor Spansky (Michael Caine) go to the Reese's mansion pretending that the winery cellar needs some repair: they manage to steal the necklace before being discovered and when Alex returns home he is knocked out by his wife, and when he wakes up he tries to retrieve the necklace and show Jason who's boss.

    While it's a well made movie and has quite a cast (Jack Nicholson, Michael Caine, Jennifer Lopez and Stephen Dorff) there are two strikes against it. First, the nature of Nicholson's character is kinda nasty in some points, and the viewer will have problem in relating with him (I more related to Caine's character while watching). Second, some of the situations were kinda awkward and not certainly what you expect with a director like Bob Rafelson. But the pros (the thrilling moments, some of the moments with Caine that tried to extinguish Nicholson's burning nature) were worth the wait and the witnessing of the bad moments.

    In substance, certainly not one of Jack Nicholson's (and Michael Caine's) finest moments but still ok in a way and not that bad as a time passer. If you don't care too much about the cons you might enjoy it more than me.
  • Without doubt this film has great performances from Caine, Nicholson and Davis (though hers' is a short role in comparison). The violence is uncalled for. The script has some great lines (e.g., Caine's lines on burial vs cremation) but the script does not hold you for long. If Rafelson wanted to make a trilogy progressing from son to brother to father--why choose a stepfather role for the "father"? Is there no difference for Rafelson? There are times when the "family" within the film son, mother and stepfather emerges as an interesting triangle but for some reason Rafelson does not invest time on this aspect except for a few flashes--(e.g., mother to son "I would have done the same" or Nicholson protecting his stepson's friend from brutality or Nicholson covering Davis' with blankets as she sleeps). Had he delved more into relationships, this film could have been a wonderful modern day Hamlet-like tragedy.
  • Life just doesn't go well for a 2 bit thief and his family when he teams up with an ex-con to steal a fancy necklace. Lots of death and violence follow as the jewel gets away from the 2 crooks who discover in the end that there is more to life than money. Good one.
  • This movie leaves a totally pointless impression. It adds noting new or original to the genre and on top of that the movie is just not a well made one.

    They desperately tried to make things more interesting with its script but the movie in fact remains nothing more but a generic genre movie, that unnecessarily makes things hard on itself with its script and redundant characters.

    The story also doesn't always flow, which is due to some bad pacing and editing. At times it feels like sequences are missing and things occur too fast after each other. The story lacks proper back-story for the characters and when the movie tries to put in some emotions they work out blank and come over as artificial and forced and completely unrealistic or believable. You can also blame the director for this. I'll bet the movie would had been way better if it didn't took itself as serious as it did. Some more 'fun' wouldn't had damaged the movie.

    Because of the failed script not much works out in the movie. It's not tense, it's not mysterious, it's not surprising. The action feels lame and the love-story misplaced and unrealistic. Some of the dialog is horrendous and it makes the characters at times seem like dumb Neanderthalers. A real offense to the viewer's intelligence.

    Despite the fact that the movie is filled with stars, the movie still is miscast. In all fairness, I think Jennifer Lopez is a good actress but it just doesn't show in this movie, in which she plays a character with a thick Cuban accent, who is supposed to be the love interest of the movie of the two main characters. Stephen Dorff feels out of place since he's only ever real good and convincing as an actor when he plays a villain, which is mostly due to his looks. Still it's interesting to see Jack Nicholson and Michael Caine as partners in crime. Especially Nicholson makes the movie worthwhile at times and his character is perhaps the only real good and enjoyable one of the movie. Though Caine is also good at times but mostly when he acts as a different person in the movie.

    A movie to forget really fast.

    4/10

    http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
  • I'm not sure why I haven't seen Blood and Wine from start to finish up until today, but it has always been intriguing as that one Jack Nicholson movie I would see in bits and pieces on TV, with J-Lo in an early supporting role as the not-quite femme fatale, and Michael Caine as a guy with a very bad cough. Seeing it today I'm reminded of the classic work Bob Rafelson, director, and Nicholson did back in the 70s, even if they already reached their peak on their first film, Five Easy Pieces. But at the least Blood and Wine represents a return to form for Nicholson under the director he worked with most, either as actor or writer (he co-wrote Head), especially in the F.E.P. role of a SOB, which, of course, is usually as easy for Nicholson as raising up his eyebrows. His character, Alex, is a criminal, but not a very good one, as he isn't entirely able to balance out his goals as a jewel thief and as an adulterer with Lopez's Gabriella. It doesn't help that his wife (Judy Davis) has a son from a previous marriage (Stephen Dorff), who has it in for Alex big-time. Meanwhile, that jewel necklace is almost up in the air, and all his craggy partner, Vic (Michael Caine), can do is cough a lot and act more as a dumb muscle than as a consummate professional.

    So in these ingredients, Rafelson and his writers have a classic, cooked-up noir with enough style by its actors and locale to make up for what would be considered 'too violent' to show back in the forties (probably too sexy too, what with Lopez's 'assets'). Rafelson knows this material needs the best cast, and assembled is the best cast for the job, where desperation, greed, proper morality and just a moment of piece of mind get shifted around but are always the constants that all these characters. Nicholson is, well, Nicholson, cold to the bone but also a great liar, violent, passionate, but won't stop till he gets his way. He's not breaking new ground or setting up himself for the usual awards circuits, but it's still very cool to see him playing Alex as believable work of sleaze, almost in the tradition of Bogart (he actually does just as good, if not better, here than he did in Rafelson's 'Postman' remake). Dorff, meanwhile, could be considered the weakest link with a cast like this, but he holds his own fairly well within his character's basic lines, especially when considering the roles he'd have to take later on. Caine is a natural at playing against "type", which doesn't really exist for him, and disappears into this pragmatic but vicious parolee. And actresses like Davis and Lopez fit into their roles in the "noir" mood with equal levels of ease. I wish I could see Lopez in more roles like this where we might not believe totally her intentions for either of the men in her life, but is not necessarily cruel like the old femme fatales either.

    Released, as they say, under the radar back in 96, Blood and Wine uses its Miami and Florida locales like they're still lush and lustful and engaging, and the danger here isn't diminished from what's usually expected in the urban cities and dark alleys. Rafelson's got his A-game on here with an enjoyable story where we can guess pretty much where it will lead- the wills of men tested head-to-head- but it's a lot of harsh fun getting there.
  • henry8-36 December 2021
    Wine merchant Nicholson teams up with dying sleazy hoodlum Caine to steal a million dollar necklace from a rich client. Having succeeded, things start to go badly wrong as his life with estranged wife (Judy Davis) and son (Stephen Dorff) and girlfriend (Jennifer Lopez) interferes with his plans.

    Enjoyable, well scripted thriller held expertly together by Rafelson and nicely delivered by a terrific cast. Nicholson is as good as ever and Caine shines as the deeply unpleasant but somehow sympathy gaining thug Victor. Dorff, Lopez and Davis are not overshadowed either. Full of wit and clever and imaginative story ideas, this is well worth catching.
  • mcpucho3 August 2004
    You would think the tandem of the glorious Michael Caine, the always stunning Jack Nicholson and the adorable Judy Davis would set a movie's heels on fire but "Blood and Wine" falls far from expectations as the sparks never start on set.

    All these esteemed actors give a good showing in their own right but their characters are flat and lifeless. The script seems compelled only to move the action along and nothing else. Mr. Caine, Mr. Nicholson and Ms. Davis give punctuation and try their best to put a breath of life into this lifeless film with an all too obvious plot.

    Stephen Dorff gives a better performance than usual (no cheers for Blade or Cecil B. Demented) but his character is far from complex, and Jennifer Lopez can't keep her faux Cuban accent up throughout the course of the film.

    The plot is rather generic and the suspense that the movie is trying to portray is better invoked by the musical score than the cinematic or script climax.

    As a saving grace the location scouting is great, really espousing the feeling of the Floridian backdrop. But that doesn't save the movie. There are as well a couple of slightly memorable stunt scenes but is not an action film.

    Skip this one and watch Chinatown again. And if you haven't seen that see it twice.
An error has occured. Please try again.