User Reviews (33)

Add a Review

  • After growing dogs and chimpanzees, the eccentric millionaire Gertrude 'Trudy' Lintz (Rene Russo) raises a sick baby gorilla in her mansion as if it were a child, calling him "Buddy". When the animal grows, her husband, Dr. Bill Lintz (Robbie Coltrane), advises her to send it to its habitat or to a zoo. However, Trudy loves Buddy and believes she can keep it at home. After an exposition in the Chicago World's Fair, Buddy has a bad experience with the public and becomes violent, not obeying Trudy's orders anymore. "Buddy" is a reasonable family entertainment, more indicated for children. The story is not bad and focuses mainly in the relationship between Trudy and Buddy, but does not develop the characters, the place, the time. When and where the story happens? Why Trudy does not have a baby and has such abnormal behavior, preferring animals to children? How far this movie is based on a true story? With regard to the film itself, the production is not bad, but there is not "heart" in the direction and interpretation. This type of story is usually very well developed by Disney studios. My vote is six.

    Title (Brazil): "Buddy"
  • My Take: More proof that decent special effects and pretty sets can't tell the story.

    BUDDY is the film that BABE could have easily been, but while that harmless, little achievement took to a different direction (and succeeded as a great, little film), BUDDY takes off on the wrong track. The story elements are easily predictable, but that's rarely the worst part since the film, despite some imagination and style which went into the production design, the story drags on. It's dully paced and slow-moving, it's pretty hard to care for a somewhat interesting character (a domesticated ape, no less).

    Rene Russo plays, and is actually fine as, eccentric wealthy animal lover Gertrude Lintz, who adopts all sorts of animals, chimpanzees mostly, and grooms them into civilized beings, dressing them up and teaches them to walk upright and eat on a table (with a spoon and fork, no less). Alongside her and her menagerie of trained (and well-dressed) apes is her husband (Robbie Coltrane), a helpful maid (Irma P. Hall) and her assistant (Alan Cumming). But when she decides to adopt a harmless orphaned gorilla, her confidence is slowly loosing as Buddy, as groomed and as attentive an animal he is, he's still an animal.

    Russo and co., thankfully given some decent roles, are actually good, and the ape (cheesy as ape suits are today) is pretty endearing. But unlike BABE, the focus pitched on the animals are pretty tedious. This time, I think, giving the animals the gift of speech is a welcome asset. Director Caroline Thompson seemed to be distracted by the overall look of the film (the production design, from costumes to sets, are spontaneously elaborate) to strongly develop the script. The story lags a long in a drowsy, monotonous pace that could even put a few children to sleep.

    What could have been an eagerly acceptable fantasy with touches of engaging tragedy is an elaborate and fancy bore. BUDDY isn't a failure, but it fails more than it succeeds. At best, it's a promise that never really got off the ground.

    Rating: **1/2 out of 5.
  • tealsplashchannel24 July 2021
    It was really bad. So much focus on main actress instead of animals and the characters didn't feel likable.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    As a big fan of gorilla movies in general, I anticipated that this one would be great - and as for the gorilla effects, They were quite good, however - that is the only thing I can write about this flop. The film claims to be based on a true story but in effect, it does not even come close to what actually happened to "Buddy" - who in real life, was the famous Gargantua, sold to Ringling Bros. by our supposed "heroic" Gertrude Lintz, known by many animal enthusiasts as a woman who hardly had her animals' welfare in the best interest. As far as Buddy being portrayed as becoming aggressive, this was total fiction and at no time did the gorilla, in real life, resort to such behavior. buddy did, in fact, escape his wooden crate (not a plush cage room as depicted in movie) during a storm, to seek shelter and comfort in the house, which frightened Gertrude Lintz into selling him. No, Buddy was not released into a gorilla family surrounded by lush trees in a zoological paradise - he was abandoned in a wooden crate, deep in the back of a garage for some time with only a single light bulb for comfort and then sold to the circus - where he actually lived a better life having peanuts thrown at him until he died (historically the oldest living gorilla on record, by the way) before a show in Miami. Notice also, in the film, how Buddy grows older but the chimpanzees never age. (The chimps, by the way, were not raised simultaneously with other animals, including Buddy, as portrayed in the film)
  • My Aunt Gertrude did own a gorilla named Buddy, but she also owned another named Massa, and they combined the lives of the 2 together.

    First let me give you the true ending, Buddy was sold to the Ringling Bros circus, his name was changed to Gargantua, Massa was sold to the Philedelphia Zoo, and lived to be the oldest living Gorilla in captivity.

    The story was hollywoodized to the extreme. If they had stuck to the facts, maybe it would have been better.

    Gertrude also raised prize winning Saint Bernards, having over 100 on her estate in Brooklyn. She won the Westminster Dog show blue ribbon 5 times in a row. She helped to develop the "modern" pet foods. Since before then people just fed their pets scraps.

    Also just one more minor note, my family is Jewish, yet in the movie, she wore a cross, and as far as I know, no-body in my family was paid or had given permission for the movie to come out.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Buddy (1997): Dir: Caroline Thompson / Cast: Rene Russo, Robbie Coltrane, Alan Cumming, Paul Reubens, Dane Cook: Poster ads feature Rene Russo sitting with her chin cupped in her hands surrounded by all sorts of animals including a gorilla named Buddy. To a parent it might seem harmless but it is about as suitable for children as Cujo. Supposedly based on a true story of a woman who could communicates with animals and the gorilla she accepts that will grow too big and out of control. At one point Buddy breaks loose and causes a panic. Then viewers are subject to an attack on this woman as well as the destruction of her home. An adult film packaged as kids entertainment that will hardly appeal to either. Also featured are two chimpanzees that toss a meat clever back and forth. Production is fine but directing by Caroline Thompson is lousy. Part of the problem here is tone. This is not Rene Russo's finest moment for she overacts to the max. It is unfortunate considering this was a grand opportunity to play a lead. In flat supporting roles are Robbie Coltrane as the doctor, and Alan Cumming as an animal keeper. Paul Reubens also makes an appearance although his playhouse is far more fun than this. Dane Cook makes an early appearance as a cop. The film has good intentions with its theme of animal rights but to o be part of this dread should be considered animal cruelty. Score: 3 / 10
  • Autobiography of founder of zoo in NYC starts out by being very cute and would be great family movie if it stayed there. however we get more and more involved with reality as gorilla grows up to be a wild thing not easily amenable to his "mother's" wishes - this might scare younger children, esp. scenes where Buddy tries to injure Gertrude. rather quick resolution at the end. below average.
  • Trudy Lintz (Rene Russo) was one very fortunate lady many years ago. She was the wife of a wealthy doctor and had lots of extracurricular money. Her passion was animals and she devoted herself to providing a sanctuary for the furry ones on her property grounds. Trudy also raised two chimps in her home to be more like children. They dressed in clothes and had many amenities. One day, she learns of an abandoned baby gorilla. Knowing nothing about the large apes, she relies on her husband's medical abilities and expert advice to save the gorilla's life. Once out of danger, Trudy decides she will raise the gorilla, also, as one of her children. This works well for years and Buddy, the gorilla, is truly a remarkably intelligent addition to her home. But, Buddy is also a gorilla and his strength and curiosity become quite enormous. Will Trudy be able to keep Buddy under control? For those who love animals, Buddy is a must-see movie. Based on a true story, Trudy and her ape develop a relationship that is unique in the annals of animal history and lore. Of course, Buddy is not a real gorilla but a mechanical one, in the film, but he is very close to seeming totally real. Russo gives a nice performance as a lady ahead of her time and the supporting players are also quite nice. The costumes are exemplary, as befitting the earlier era of the story, and the settings and production values outstanding. But, most importantly, animals are here in abundance, not only Buddy, but the adorable chimps, the ducks, the rabbits, and so forth. For those who want to watch a film and be transported to animal heaven, here on earth, this is a great movie choice. All animal lovers, and even those who just want to watch a great family film, will go "ape" over Buddy.
  • This was a nice, gentle film with no villains, pretty colors, nice surround sound, a nice recreation of the early 20th century and a fast-moving story. That's the good news.

    The bad news is that for a story that is supposed to be "true," it is ludicrous. No animal understands human language as well as another human. Duh! Not in this movie; here they do, which leads the filmmakers into their gigantic plus for Darwinism. They even bring a priest into the picture who proclaims (while looking into "Buddy" the gorilla's eyes, "Those are not the eyes of an animal!"

    Are you kidding me?They aren't even subtle about their evolution propaganda and it's some of the most ridiculous baloney I've ever heard.

    Too bad because, as I said, it's basically a nice film with nice people. They even show a nice husband, played by Robbie Coltrane. Hollywood usually doesn't show husbands in a good light. In their twist political correctness, women are good and men are bad. Not here.
  • metta14 January 2018
    Think about it, getting real chimps and a gorilla to wear clothes and to act on cue! Perhaps some was fixed up later but seeing real animals acting in a movie is amazing!!!

    I didn't see the end, sounds sad, Like that the relative of the real animal owner posted a review!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    My 5 year old picked this movie as our Friday night family movie. It seemed fun and cute! Boy was I wrong! The only thing funny and cute about this movie is the Chimps.

    About 5 minutes in you think this lady is Deranged!!!! And then there is a whole lip stick scene that just seems uncomfortable! I was afraid I was going to have to make a fast jump on the remote!

    And then when you finally think she may have gotten her stuff together you make the mistake of looking up the true story of this lady and realize she is the complete opposite of an activist for animals!!!!

    Don't watch this movie!!!
  • I enjoyed the innocence of this film and how the characters had to deal with the reality of having a powerful animal in their midst. The gorilla looks just terrific, and the eyes were especially lifelike. It's even a little scary at times and should have children slightly frightened without going over the top. Rene Russo plays her role wonderfully feminine. Usually these type of Hollywood films that take place in the past feel the need to create a straw-man villain but the only adversary is the gorilla. It's an interesting look at how close some animals are to humans, how they feel the same emotions we do, and yet how we really can't treat them just like people because they aren't. Not many films venture into this territory and it's worth seeing if you want to contemplate the human-animal similarity.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Oh my god, this film felt like 40 minutes long and i found it deeply emotional T-T, i know Rene Russo isn't the only actress that cares about some silly 300lb ape but COME ON!!! this film is REALLY childish and it's emotional scenes deferred very very badly against many films released in 1997, including Hercules & Titanic. OK, might right a spoiler here; Buddy starts of as some 6inch Gorilla cub, He gains weight once a year, after a massacre in a World Fair he becomes hotheaded and nearly tries to kill Rene Russo after a kitchen accident, Later, Buddy was so angry he destroyed most of the mansion and has been sent to a zoo ever since. The true story is the Oldest Known Gorilla died at the age of 54, so yeah, it's that non-fictional kids...
  • I just watched Buddy for the first time on TV. I thought it was great! I am a big animal lover and yes, I too treat them more like my children than animals.

    Buddy is a movie that will delight animal lovers. I really felt that Rene Russo portrayed the bond between her and the gorilla. The loved each other.

    When Buddy ran free at the fair, it was the frightened screams he was met with that frightened him. It was just cruel when people threw things at him. It very much saddened me when the inevitable happened. I cried and cried. I do not understand anyone who does not love this movie. The only thing I can think of, is that if you don't like this movie, you don't like animals.
  • Curiously, it is Rene Russo's eyes and mouth--not Buddy the Gorilla's-- that emerge as the focal point of "Buddy", a Jim Henson Pictures production through Francis Ford Coppola's Zoetrope. Somehow, countless close-ups of Russo's face slipped passed in the post-production stages, and she literally fills the screen so many times the poor apes are upstaged. Unintentionally funny true story adapted from Gertrude "Trudy" Davies Lint's memoirs about a wealthy doctor's wife who turns their mansion into a menagerie for pets and wild-life. The movie goes beyond good intentions...it positively drips with earnest sincerity. The movie never sparkles with the kind of "family film" magic that it needed, and before too long both the people and the animals seem distinctly programmed (nothing here feels real). About ten minutes in, two chimpanzees are goofing around in Russo's kitchen and start throwing a butcher's knife back and forth (it misses Alan Cumming's head by inches); yet, no eyebrows are raised because it's all in a day's fun. Still, when full-grown gorilla Buddy gets crazy during a thunderstorm, the cops are called--and everyone stares at Buddy through the window while he busts up the living room furniture. The furniture should be the least of anyone's worries in this flabbergasting, do-gooder failure. But, at least we know Russo was in good hands: whenever director Caroline Thompson needs a good pick-up shot, she gives unstartled Rene another extreme close-up. I wonder what the lipstick budget was on this picture? *1/2 from ****
  • If there was a scale below 1, it would get a -10, following in the footsteps of Godspell. The acting (if there was such a thing) was atrocious, the plot in shambles. And Rene Russo was sickeningly sweet in her role, enough to make a person retch. Ten thumbs down for a dumb movie. Saving grace: kudos for era costuming.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Buddy," tells the true story of a crazy woman, who could communicate with animals. Trudy Lindz (Rene Russo,) raises animals in her home in the 1930s. She's considered an eccentric weirdo, and Russo pulls that off well in this movie. How much of it is based on the true story, I don't know, but the film is awkward and boring, attempting to establish that this woman did something good for animals by keeping them in her house. It revolves around a sickly baby Gorilla, and she attempts to raise him until disaster strikes. What would you expect from an aging Gorilla living in your house?

    What struck me is that the poster ads for the movie show Rene Russo cupping her hands and surrounded by all sorts of animals that live in her house, including the Gorilla, Buddy. To a parent, this might seem like a family-friendly movie but it's far from that and I don't think the producers knew exactly what they were doing with this movie. Telling the story of a woman who raised animals in her home proves not an easy story to tell when the story is just that and nothing else.

    She lives in a sprawling mansion with Geese, Dogs, Cats, a mouthy Parrot, Horses and two Chimpanzees she raises as her kids. None of it is convincing. They throw meat cleavers back and forth at each other, in the kitchen, with the cook (Irma P. Hall,) in the middle. Trudy attempts to spook them with a voodoo rattle to get them to behave, and it's not convincing, instead, it's uncomfortable when it's made to look like she can control these animals to fit her strange agenda.

    Early in the movie, she takes them to the movies, and the patrons around her are agitated when they start squealing. The usher sees the monkeys, and she acts as if nothing is wrong. Only an eccentric millionaire with a chip on her shoulder would do this because she has money and feels steps above everyone else. Her husband, Dr. Bill Lintz (Robbie Coltrane,) lives with her, and it's hard to tell whether he likes the idea or if he is going along with her ideas because she is wack.

    She gets a call to go to Philadelphia where a baby gorilla named "Buddy," is very sick. After condemning whoever the hell the weirdo she talks to is, because he knows nothing about Gorillas and should be ashamed of himself, her self-absorbed and rich attitude just whiskes the basket away from him and she storms off with it but to his surprise. Bill, tries to help the animal. He takes out his stethoscope and examines Buddy. Bill gravely tells her double pneumonia. He gets better, and she insists on raising him as her son, much to the chagrin of the other two monkeys.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Get your movie off me you damned dirty ape! Sorry to see the chimps exploited in the movie and I wonder where those chimps are now. That being said, the movie was sappy and disappointing. The costuming was great but the movie over all just feels meandering and pointless. There is almost a point where Russo's character realizes that she's abused this animal by having it live like a human but then she misses the realization in favor of the belief that she's somehow still in control of Buddy the gorilla. Would have made a decent Fatal Attractions episode but not a good full length feature film. Go see Chimpanzee instead.
  • Rene Russo's eyes and mouth, not Buddy the Gorilla's, become the main focus of "Buddy", a Jim Henson Pictures production through Francis Ford Coppola's Zoetrope. Surprisingly, numerous close-ups of Russo's face slipped through in post-production, and she literally fills the screen so many times that the poor apes are upstaged. This unintentionally funny true story is adapted from Gertrude "Trudy" Davies Lint's memoirs about a wealthy doctor's wife who turns their mansion into a menagerie for pets and wildlife. The movie goes beyond good intentions-it positively drips with earnest sincerity. However, it never sparkles with the kind of "family film" magic that it needed, and before too long both the people and the animals seem distinctly programmed (nothing here feels real). About ten minutes in, two chimpanzees are goofing around in Russo's kitchen and start throwing a butcher's knife back and forth (it misses Alan Cumming's head by inches); yet, no eyebrows are raised because it's all in a day's fun. Still, when full-grown gorilla Buddy gets crazy during a thunderstorm, the cops are called-and everyone stares at Buddy through the window while he busts up the living room furniture. The furniture should be the least of anyone's worries in this flabbergasting, do-gooder failure. But, at least we know Russo was in good hands: whenever director Caroline Thompson needs a good pick-up shot, she gives unstartled Rene another extreme close-up. I wonder what the lipstick budget was on this picture? *1/2 from ****
  • Buddy is an entertaining family film set in a time when "humanizing" animals, and making them cute was an accepted way to get people to be interested in them.

    Based on a true story, Buddy shows the great love that the main characters have for animals and for each other, and that they will do anything for each other.

    While not a perfect movie, the animated gorilla is quite lifelike most of the time and the mayhem that occurs within the home is usually amusing for children.

    This film misses an opportunity to address the mistake of bringing wild animals into the home as pets, but does show the difficulties.

    A recommended film which was the first for Jim Henson Productions.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Some reviewers are moved by this being a 'true story', so it's worth mentioning from the beginning that it is not. The real Buddy was not picked up from a zoo and was not retired peacefully. He did not live with Lintz for as long as this gorilla did and he certainly wasn't dressed up to serve canapes to dinner guests. The true story has a ton more tragedy and sadness and cruelty, as well as a good deal more moral ambiguity in the figure of Lintz herself.

    If the story were really based in reality then this movie's slackness might be forgivable. As it is, there's little to redeem it. The script is slack and any visual pleasure relies on the actions of the chimpanzees. Even Robbie Coltrane's smile can't penetrate the gloom of this production.
  • One of the worst films I have seen in some time, this movie was all the more disappointing because it missed the opportunity to say something very important about man's relationship with animals.

    There is almost no value to this film as it stands. It's never explained why Rene Russo's character wants to keep so many animals and turn them into humans, or why her husband, by all appearances completely sane, puts up with it. One meaningless scene follows another, none of them with enough humor or pathos to merit watching.
  • I was lucky (?) enough to receive free tickets to Buddy during its opening week. I stood in a line with other people who were too cheap or too bright to spend money on this bomb.

    The question that came up in the movie most in my mind was, "Why?" Not, "Why did this woman try to raise a gorilla?" or, "Why did this woman dress chimpanzees in little outfits?" but rather, "Why was this movie released to the public?"

    If you want a rampaging gorilla movie, there's always any of the King Kong movies. If you want beautiful people, check out anything on MTV. If you want a fish out of water movie, check out any of thousands of other movies from roughly 1900 through today.
  • I got the DVD of this movie in a cereal box years ago when I was a little kid. I have loved this movie ever since and have watched it time and time again. This movie was amazing especially for animal lovers. I believe it's very under appreciated. It was sweet and brought tears to my eyes. But you probably do have to be an animal lover to fully like this movie. I wish this movie would go into theaters although it has already been out on DVD for awhile. I wish more attention was brought to this movie because I think it could've done decently well. I wish to show this to my children one day. It's a good movie for kids although maybe a few of the scenes could be a tad frightening. Buddy is a lovable character and this is a great movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Based on an apparently true story, Rene Russo plays a woman who has very unconventional ideas about wild animals and how they should be treated. She ends up with a bunch of Chimps and assorted other animals living as children in her home, along with her physician husband. Set around the time of the Chicago World's Fair. This film focuses on the part of her story where she rescues a sick baby gorilla and raises it to be a part of the family, including dressing him as a person.

    some SPOILERS follow - As the gorilla grows up it behaves for the most part as planned. It is shown carrying a tray to serve h'orderves to visitors, or helping the maid scrub floors in the kitchen. He develops a fondness for things red, a scarf, a rose, a velvet chair. Still, he sleeps in a sort of cage, a bedroom with locked iron bars. He is strong, be breaks out, wrecks the house, wreaks havoc at the World's Fair. Finally they are forced to find a more appropriate home for him, a protected natural habitat with other gorillas.

    The gorilla was an actor in a gorilla suit. While the movie was entertaining in parts, especially the Chimps, and it has a moderately interesting message, overall it is not a particularly good movie. Free DVD loan from my local library.
An error has occured. Please try again.